PDA

View Full Version : That was FAST: Yesterday it was gay marriage; Now look who wants “equal rights”



Cebu_4_2
28th June 2015, 10:43 AM
That was FAST: Yesterday it was gay marriage; Now look who wants “equal rights”Written by Ashley Edwardson on June 27, 2015
http://allenbwest.com/2015/06/that-was-fast-yesterday-it-was-gay-marriage-now-look-who-wants-equal-rights/

I am not adding much commentary to this, because I really think little is necessary. I am busy trying to find a hand hold on our slippery slope, because I fear my nation is falling into an abyss.

Excerpted from the Northern Colorado Gazette:

Using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.

Critics of the homosexual lifestyle have long claimed that once it became acceptable to identify homosexuality as simply an “alternative lifestyle” or sexual orientation, logically nothing would be off limits.

“Gay” advocates have taken offense at such a position insisting this would never happen. However, psychiatrists are now beginning to advocate redefining pedophilia in the same way homosexuality was redefined several years ago.

In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. A group of psychiatrists with B4U-Act recently held a symposium proposing a new definition of pedophilia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders of the APA.

B4U-Act calls pedophiles “minor-attracted people.” The organization’s website states its purpose is to, “help mental health professionals learn more about attraction to minors and to consider the effects of stereotyping, stigma and fear.”

In 1998 The APA issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”

Pedophilia has already been granted protected status by the Federal Government. The Matthew Shephard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act lists “sexual orientation” as a protected class; however, it does not define the term.

Republicans attempted to add an amendment specifying that “pedophilia is not covered as an orientation;” however, the amendment was defeated by Democrats. Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fl) stated that all alternative sexual lifestyles should be protected under the law. “This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans, regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these ‘philias’ and fetishes and ‘isms’ that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule.”

The White House praised the bill saying, “At root, this isn’t just about our laws; this is about who we are as a people. This is about whether we value one another – whether we embrace our differences rather than allowing them to become a source of animus.”

Earlier this year two psychologists in Canada declared that pedophilia is a sexual orientation just like homosexuality or heterosexuality.

Van Gijseghem, psychologist and retired professor of the University of Montreal, told members of Parliament, “Pedophiles are not simply people who commit a small offense from time to time but rather are grappling with what is equivalent to a sexual orientation just like another individual may be grappling with heterosexuality or even homosexuality.”

He went on to say, “True pedophiles have an exclusive preference for children, which is the same as having a sexual orientation. You cannot change this person’s sexual orientation. He may, however, remain abstinent.”

When asked if he should be comparing pedophiles to homosexuals, Van Gijseghem replied, “If, for instance, you were living in a society where heterosexuality is proscribed or prohibited and you were told that you had to get therapy to change your sexual orientation, you would probably say that that is slightly crazy. In other words, you would not accept that at all. I use this analogy to say that, yes indeed, pedophiles do not change their sexual orientation.”
Dr. Quinsey, professor emeritus of psychology at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario, agreed with Van Gijseghem. Quinsey said pedophiles’ sexual interests prefer children and, “There is no evidence that this sort of preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else.”

In July, 2010 Harvard health Publications said, “Pedophilia is a sexual orientation and unlikely to change. Treatment aims to enable someone to resist acting on his sexual urges.”
Linda Harvey, of Mission America, said the push for pedophiles to have equal rights will become more and more common as LGBT groups continue to assert themselves. “It’s all part of a plan to introduce sex to children at younger and younger ages; to convince them that normal friendship is actually a sexual attraction.”

Milton Diamond, a University of Hawaii professor and director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society, stated that child pornography could be beneficial to society because, “Potential sex offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex against children.”

Diamond is a distinguished lecturer for the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco. The IASHS openly advocated for the repeal of the Revolutionary war ban on homosexuals serving in the military.

The IASHS lists, on its website, a list of “basic sexual rights” that includes “the right to engage in sexual acts or activities of any kind whatsoever, providing they do not involve nonconsensual acts, violence, constraint, coercion or fraud.” Another right is to, “be free of persecution, condemnation, discrimination, or societal intervention in private sexual behavior” and “the freedom of any sexual thought, fantasy or desire.” The organization also says that no one should be “disadvantaged because of age.”

[Note: the website also says in its mission statement: The Institute is dedicated to the belief that sexual rights are basic human rights and it is appropriate to help students understand that many people have been hurt, falsely imprisoned, harassed and persecuted because of laws and misinformation about the role and place of sexuality and its many expressions by individuals in our society.

Sex offender laws protecting children have been challenged in several states including California, Georgia and Iowa. Sex offenders claim the laws prohibiting them from living near schools or parks are unfair because it penalizes them for life.

Please pray for our nation.

[Note: this article was written by Ashley Edwardson]

Tags: pedophillia
Guardian of the Republic

EE_
28th June 2015, 11:18 AM
Children are more wise to their sexual identity at an earlier age today. There are reports of parents getting underage children gender reassignment surgery, and it seems to be legal?
So in today's world where all the rules are thrown out, and anything goes, why not? The degenerate liberals just need to come up with a new socially acceptable name for molesting children. Maybe the newly gay married will start adopting children to spice up their perverted bedroom activities?

ximmy
29th June 2015, 09:40 AM
we knew this was coming. nothing wrong with child love.

they are promoting it well...

Look at all the views


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vjPBrBU-TM

Horn
29th June 2015, 09:50 AM
I'd have thought some polygamist in Utah or Islamic parts of Michigan would have stepped up prior to even the gays...

Serpo
30th June 2015, 12:16 AM
Legalizing Polygamy and Pedophilia


By Charles M. Phipps on June 29th, 2015
http://i1.wp.com/www.charlesmphipps.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/NOM-Cartoon.jpg?zoom=1.5&resize=576%2C408 (http://i1.wp.com/www.charlesmphipps.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/NOM-Cartoon.jpg)Now that the Supreme Court has created the constitutional right to homosexual marriage it seems prudent to offer an examination to related social issues in order to determine which perversities will be next on the left’s agenda to be normalized. One need not look very hard for the answer.
Polygamy is an obvious choice. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts noted in his dissenting opinion in the Obergefell decision that the majority of the Court seemingly opened the door for polygamy in their maneuvers to legalize that which had no constitutional basis. The majority’s opinion which legalized homosexual marriage could easily be construed as also requiring the legalization of polygamy.
“Although the majority randomly inserts the adjective “two” in various places, it offers no reason at all why the two-person element of the core definition of marriage may be preserved while the man-woman element may not. Indeed, from the standpoint of history and tradition, a leap from opposite-sex marriage to same-sex marriage is much greater than one from a two-person union to plural unions, which have deep roots in some cultures around the world. If the majority is willing to take the big leap, it is hard to see how it can say no to the shorter one. It is striking how much of the majority’s reasoning would apply with equal force to the claim of a fundamental right to plural marriage.”
“When asked about a plural marital union at oral arguments, petitioners asserted that a State “doesn’t have such an institution.” But that is exactly the point: the States at issue here do not have an institution of same-sex marriage, either.”

Should someone wish to challenge the laws against polygamy I don’t see how they would not be able to prevail, given the Court’s ruling in Obergefell and the decision written by the majority. But, as the majority seems to interpret the law based on their own leftist proclivities instead of the Constitution, anything is possible now. In 2012, the Court declared the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional because they claimed it was not the jurisdiction of the Federal government to dictate what is and isn’t marriage. And now the Court has declared all state bans on homosexual marriage unconstitutional, because the Federal government has the jurisdiction to decide what is and isn’t marriage.
http://i2.wp.com/www.charlesmphipps.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/pedophile1.jpg?zoom=1.5&resize=355%2C213 (http://i2.wp.com/www.charlesmphipps.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/pedophile1.jpg)Another perversity being mentioned of late in the same sentence as the word ‘legalize’ is pedophilia. Yes, child molesting. For several years now I have been reading of leftist psychiatrists who claim that pedophilia is not a choice or a perversion, but a lifelong sexual orientation. And as such, they claim pedophilia should be a protected class of people the same as homosexuals. Ridiculous, you say? Oh, ye of short memory. It was just eleven years ago that Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriage. In the years leading up to that it would never have occurred to anyone that we’d be where we are today because of the Obergefell decision. So don’t tell me that legalizing pedophilia will never happen.
In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. Now the APA is proposing to redefine pedophilia. In 1998 the APA issued a report that claimed the “negative potential of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that the ‘vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”
Milton Diamond, a University of Hawaii professor and director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society has said that child pornography could be very useful to society because pedophiles “use child pornography as a substitute for sex against children.” Apparently, it completely escapes him that child pornography can’t be produced without sexually abusing children.
It should not come as surprising when morally bankrupt people demand the right to have their perversions legalized. When leftist judges rubber stamp the depravity, of course the licentious people will come back time and time again seeking to have more perversity legalized. That pedophilia has even been mentioned as a protected ‘orientation’ is an indication of just how far down the rabbit hole we’ve come as a society. The Obergefell decision may have legalized homosexual marriage, but there’s a lot of perversity left to legalize and it is a certainty that there are some sick people out there working to do just that. No doubt the child molesters will have little trouble finding leftist judges who will create their constitutional rights out of thin air, just like the majority did in Obergefell.http://www.charlesmphipps.net/legalizing-polygamy-and-pedophilia/






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3KV4fLSNoU

Serpo
30th June 2015, 02:29 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=75&v=lVR4BTLDt6A


Good vid but long.....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=28&v=4UInPN8zuqQ