View Full Version : Plane' was hologram
Serpo
25th July 2015, 10:33 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=17&v=ek-Q0T9wK2gproof of 911 T.V fakery https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxWwn... (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxWwnDLKYGY) --- No amount of evidence will make someone see what they cannot accept--All of the so called victims of the staged " t.v fakery'd " plane crash's were fictitious characters created out of a computer database,and the family's who had relatives die on the fake planes,well ,they were hired actors..when you begin to dig down the rabbit hole it gets uglier and darker as you go.. ..its just sickening how the mass majority is a slave to the lie fed to them,the arrogant,brainwashed and blind leading one another...ugghh,what a total turn off !!
my friends,the government counts on the masses inability to be able to put all the pieces together,the government knows the majority of duped minds couldn't fathom that our good ole USA,the land of the free & under god would want to kill us off..the media is a weapon of mass persuasion/destruction in the way it enslaves the masses inside of a staged lie that's been built w/one intention in mind,to keep us asleep,not asking any questions & thinking the way they want us to.
orbs and drones were seen at the twin towers on 9/11,and witnessed at the pentagon the day of the deliberate disaster,exotic weapons are no joke and were used for both attacks,9/11 and the pentagon.
We know that orbs can be used as transmitters and receivers because they have great, refractory and optical properties, orbs were witnessed all over on 9/11,they also are capable of transmitting digital or analog sound and video.' THIS IS WHERE THE JET ENGINE NOISE WAS GENERATED " The satellites can be programmed to track and monitor various areas, they can be disguised as birds.
This is what they were doing at the time of the attacks.
The beam entrained with the orb carries pictures in each just like the different frames in a movie. It is a particle beam weapon that is also a psyop frequency device. The satellites can project holographic pictures, sounds, and sensations to people through this technology. For instance some orbs have the ability to cloak themselves as birds.
ABOUT THE VIDEO:
Watch carefully, especially the left wing.
All I have done is slow down this video, zoom in, and freeze some frames -- I have not modified this footage in any other way.
Scientists who are experts in the holographic projection field and have viewed this footage say that there is no way that this could possibly be a real plane, but it is definitely a holographic projection, and that the mysterious disappearance of the left wing of the supposed "plane" was caused by part of the smoke plume getting in the way of the satellite-mounted holographic projector.
Bush administration officials have come up with a few lame excuses.
However, none of their excuses explain why the left wing clearly disappears before impact, while the right wing remains visible until it supposedly enters the building.
Take careful note that there is an explosion to the left of the supposed "fuselage" that occurs where the left wing would have been, but there is no left wing entering the building at all because there was no plane -- it was a US military missile, poorly disguised using holographic technology.
Top 10 reasons why no planes hit the WTC on 9/11 http://www.asiaobserver.com/forum/22-
Therapy Group for "Planehuggers"
http://www.911closeup.com/nico/FAQ_pl... (http://www.911closeup.com/nico/FAQ_planehuggers.html)
madfranks
25th July 2015, 10:39 AM
Honestly, I have no idea how that video shows the plane was a hologram. All I see is a low-resolution, low frame rate video blown up and slowed down.
Serpo
25th July 2015, 10:44 AM
The wing disappears, the plane disappears into a building , this is impossible.
Its more than low resolution, in one part the plane is completely inside the building with nothing happening , thats not possible.
Remember this is the same plane that the cockpit was briefly seen poking out the other of the building before they cut the feed.
crimethink
25th July 2015, 01:03 PM
These absurd videos are concocted by tools of the System to disseminate doubt in and scorn of "9/11 Truthers."
9/11 was an engineered event, but making shit up about "holograms," "nuclear weapons in the basement," and so on serves solely to reinforce, not discredit, the official story.
Uncle Salty
25th July 2015, 01:48 PM
Photoshop for video...mayhaps?
Hologram 9/11...yeah okay.
Fucking retarded.
Norweger
25th July 2015, 01:54 PM
It doesn't make sense how an aluminum airliner could penetrate a steel building. Seeing the obvious fakery later years in other "cataclysmic events" i have no problem believing that they faked the footage and showed witness testimonies from actors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5y8PtfKA14
Shami-Amourae
25th July 2015, 01:55 PM
Hilarious Daily Shoah Episode which "exposes" 9-11:
Download MP3 (https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/179774293/download?client_id=a3e059563d7fd3372b49b37f00a00bc f)
Cebu_4_2
25th July 2015, 04:23 PM
These absurd videos are concocted by tools of the System to disseminate doubt in and scorn of "9/11 Truthers."
9/11 was an engineered event, but making shit up about "holograms," "nuclear weapons in the basement," and so on serves solely to reinforce, not discredit, the official story.
original
The video was
WTF is up with this boards formatting?
The original video was uploaded just after 911 showing this but was much clearer. Showed the front of the plane protrude through the buildings other side. The nuclear weapons in the basement were confirmed as 'loud booms' by first responders and thoose videos were pretty much scrubbed. No clue if they were nuclear but were confirmed as loud booms.
Perhaps this vid is the last remaining?
Sorry about spelling formatting is jacked.
Serpo
25th July 2015, 04:25 PM
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/nZ0mhQ9NVH9oRHnDv8JkE0VWmqrYswiWqy6MCiuv697-br14HFkwUwPdqrpqC7US0x5AZliPKxf7HhRg0lKjmjsv0IR6Ui jmiMdXmsnVuRuozOYXFGa8gGY=s0-d-e1-ft#https://nsnbc.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/flight175.jpg?w=300&h=277 (https://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/flight175/)Take this picture here.............this is a hologram.......the plane is half in and half out of the building...........
.http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/false-flags/item/261-9-11-planes-no-planes-and-video-fakery
Neuro
25th July 2015, 04:29 PM
Honestly, I have no idea how that video shows the plane was a hologram. All I see is a low-resolution, low frame rate video blown up and slowed down.
The wing appeared to disappear, because it became similar in colour to the WTC, look at the smoke, large chunk black, large chunks grey all in squares, it is the limitations of the camera doing it. Clearly disinformation!
Neuro
25th July 2015, 04:36 PM
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/nZ0mhQ9NVH9oRHnDv8JkE0VWmqrYswiWqy6MCiuv697-br14HFkwUwPdqrpqC7US0x5AZliPKxf7HhRg0lKjmjsv0IR6Ui jmiMdXmsnVuRuozOYXFGa8gGY=s0-d-e1-ft#https://nsnbc.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/flight175.jpg?w=300&h=277 (https://nsnbc.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/911-planesno-planes-and-video-fakery/flight175/)Take this picture here.............this is a hologram.......the plane is half in and half out of the building...........
.http://www.veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/false-flags/item/261-9-11-planes-no-planes-and-video-fakery
Have you ever seen a hologram like this anywhere else?
Serpo
25th July 2015, 04:37 PM
So a plane can disappear into a building and its called disinformation..................?
Serpo
25th July 2015, 04:38 PM
Missile Firing Off the Roof of the Woolworth Building
"Someone had fired missiles at the World Trade Center's north tower from atop the nearby Woolworth Building."
WNBC News
(http://www.wnbc.com/news/2439367/detail.html)
(http://www.wnbc.com/news/2439367/detail.html)"...we just had a second explosion, possibly a missile from the roof of the Woolworth Building."
Port Authority Police Officer
WNBC News
(http://www.wnbc.com/news/2439367/detail.html)
(http://www.wnbc.com/news/2439367/detail.html)"They're shooting at the Trade Center from the Woolworth Building."
Radio Dispatch
NY Daily News
(http://www.nydailynews.com/news/local/story/113055p-102094c.html)
(http://www.nydailynews.com/news/local/story/113055p-102094c.html)"The first one they think was a guy shooting the missiles off the Woolworth Building."
WTC Police Channel 07
Mercury News
(http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/6648563.htm)
(http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/6648563.htm)"Woolworth Building! They're firing missiles from Woolworth Building!"
Police Channel
Portland Inymedia (http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/09/297359.shtml)
"...there was a missile launch at the Woolworth building."
Police Officer, 09:18AM
Mailgate News (http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:6H3OKHxbAGcJ:www.mailgate.org/news/news.misc/msg02423.html+missile+woolworth+building&hl=en)
"...the police had a report that a missile had been fired at the World Trade Center from the Woolworth building."
Alan Reiss, WTC Police Desk
9-11 Commission Hearing (http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing11/reiss_statement.pdf)
"[About 50 yards from the Tower] There was a 'swooshing' sound, then an explosion, and it sounded really low. It was if someone, one or two floors above me, had launched a shoulder-fired missile."
Lance Cpl. Alan Reifenberg
Marine Corps News (http://www.lejeune.usmc.mil/unitas/Marine%20Corps%20News%20Remembering%209-11,%20A%20Survivor%27s%20Story.htm)
As we pulled ‘round the corner, we stopped the rig, and a cop walked over to us and said, `I saw them shoot a missile launcher off that [Woolworth] building, you guys better be careful up there.’
NYC Fireman
Mr.Bellers Neighborhood (http://www.mrbellersneighborhood.com/beller.pl?id=235)
Unobstructed View of the World Trade Center
from the Woolworth Building
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/satellite-woolworth-towers.jpg
The red arrow is the suspected video angle that Bush Junior had of the first plane hitting the North tower before he went inside to read the goat story to an elementary school class the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_41.htm
Neuro
25th July 2015, 04:40 PM
So a plane can disappear into a building and its called disinformation..................?
Did you ever watch a slow motion of a bullet hitting a solid object in extreme slow motion?
The plane is semi solid and so is the building, at 800 km/h I would say it is likely, that it appears to disappear, especially with a camera that is slow...
Neuro
25th July 2015, 04:58 PM
Missile Firing Off the Roof of the Woolworth Building
"Someone had fired missiles at the World Trade Center's north tower from atop the nearby Woolworth Building."
WNBC News
(http://www.wnbc.com/news/2439367/detail.html)
(http://www.wnbc.com/news/2439367/detail.html)"...we just had a second explosion, possibly a missile from the roof of the Woolworth Building."
Port Authority Police Officer
WNBC News
(http://www.wnbc.com/news/2439367/detail.html)
(http://www.wnbc.com/news/2439367/detail.html)"They're shooting at the Trade Center from the Woolworth Building."
Radio Dispatch
NY Daily News
(http://www.nydailynews.com/news/local/story/113055p-102094c.html)
(http://www.nydailynews.com/news/local/story/113055p-102094c.html)"The first one they think was a guy shooting the missiles off the Woolworth Building."
WTC Police Channel 07
Mercury News
(http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/6648563.htm)
(http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/6648563.htm)"Woolworth Building! They're firing missiles from Woolworth Building!"
Police Channel
Portland Inymedia (http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/09/297359.shtml)
"...there was a missile launch at the Woolworth building."
Police Officer, 09:18AM
Mailgate News (http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:6H3OKHxbAGcJ:www.mailgate.org/news/news.misc/msg02423.html+missile+woolworth+building&hl=en)
"...the police had a report that a missile had been fired at the World Trade Center from the Woolworth building."
Alan Reiss, WTC Police Desk
9-11 Commission Hearing (http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing11/reiss_statement.pdf)
"[About 50 yards from the Tower] There was a 'swooshing' sound, then an explosion, and it sounded really low. It was if someone, one or two floors above me, had launched a shoulder-fired missile."
Lance Cpl. Alan Reifenberg
Marine Corps News (http://www.lejeune.usmc.mil/unitas/Marine%20Corps%20News%20Remembering%209-11,%20A%20Survivor%27s%20Story.htm)
As we pulled ‘round the corner, we stopped the rig, and a cop walked over to us and said, `I saw them shoot a missile launcher off that [Woolworth] building, you guys better be careful up there.’
NYC Fireman
Mr.Bellers Neighborhood (http://www.mrbellersneighborhood.com/beller.pl?id=235)
Unobstructed View of the World Trade Center
from the Woolworth Building
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_sociopol/satellite-woolworth-towers.jpg
The red arrow is the suspected video angle that Bush Junior had of the first plane hitting the North tower before he went inside to read the goat story to an elementary school class the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_41.htm
Sure not impossible, but we still didn't see a hologram, possibly a photoshop...
madfranks
25th July 2015, 04:59 PM
It doesn't make sense how an aluminum airliner could penetrate a steel building.
Force = mass x acceleration. The plane was moving at a high enough velocity that even though its mass was little, its force was great.
Don't get me wrong, I don't believe the official story for one single second, but there are much more factual, scientific problems with the official narrative than believing a low res poor quality video is proof of the planes being holograms.
Serpo
25th July 2015, 05:09 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUoqwUVOxHE
Glass
25th July 2015, 05:15 PM
there is that footage which pans towards the building showing the sky a long way out, and there is nothing in coming. Then after it rests on the building for maybe 1 second it starts to pan back out and there is this plane visible. Not enough time for it to cover the distance from the starting point of the previous pan, to the point where is shows up on screen.
This suggests something. Not sure what. Either the footage was shopped or the aircraft was.
There are numerous sound bites of people on the ground seeing the second plane but realising it was grey in colour and without windows.
I see from the top down view of the WTC's towers that there is an all seeing eye in the building forecourt. I did not know that. A reasonable clue IMO. We should look for prominent buildings that have these types of signs as probable targets for these people. Does that make the vatican a target? Or the parliament of australia? There are more than a few others out there I'm sure.
Cebu_4_2
25th July 2015, 05:47 PM
What about the recent insurance policies taken out on the WTC buildings?
madfranks
25th July 2015, 06:00 PM
What about the recent insurance policies taken out on the WTC buildings?
Does that prove the plane was a hologram?
Jewboo
25th July 2015, 06:02 PM
Take this picture here.............this is a hologram...
http://cineymuchomas.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/king-kong-2005.jpg
Waste of time arguing "facts" and "evidence" when they have Photoshop.
We can no longer believe our own eyes...
:rolleyes:
Shami-Amourae
25th July 2015, 06:15 PM
Waste of time arguing "facts" and "evidence" when they have Photoshop.
We can no longer believe our own eyes...
:rolleyes:
Jewboo, listen to my MP3 I linked to. It's funny shit.
:)
Norweger
25th July 2015, 06:26 PM
Force = mass x acceleration. The plane was moving at a high enough velocity that even though its mass was little, its force was great.
Don't get me wrong, I don't believe the official story for one single second, but there are much more factual, scientific problems with the official narrative than believing a low res poor quality video is proof of the planes being holograms.
Imagine a skyscraper at the speed of the airplane ramming into an airplane standing still... equal and opposite reactions and all that jazz. I don't buy into all this hologram nonsense, but i believe that most of the witnesses are actors and the videos of the planes are fakes.
Serpo
25th July 2015, 07:12 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5-xcvv_fRQ
Serpo
25th July 2015, 07:16 PM
Force = mass x acceleration. The plane was moving at a high enough velocity that even though its mass was little, its force was great.
Don't get me wrong, I don't believe the official story for one single second, but there are much more factual, scientific problems with the official narrative than believing a low res poor quality video is proof of the planes being holograms.
And the wing tips are made of very fragile stuff butt they seem to cut through metal and steel.
Pilots also say planes cannot fly this fast at ground level.
crimethink
25th July 2015, 08:14 PM
It doesn't make sense how an aluminum airliner could penetrate a steel building. Seeing the obvious fakery later years in other "cataclysmic events" i have no problem believing that they faked the footage and showed witness testimonies from actors.
It's a matter of mass x velocity...doesn't matter if the airplane was made of plastic. That much energy will punch through. Further, the building was not all steel. That large aircraft, likely US Air Force or CIAirlines contract jets, actually were employed against the Towers is reasonable, and factual.
What is in question is:
1) who orchestrated it;
2) who, or what, flew the planes (e.g., remote control);
3) was anyone actually aboard the planes;
4) who placed the charges within the Towers prior to the plane impacts;
5) who planted the "impossible artifacts" like the infamous passport after the fact.
Those are key to unraveling the official conspiracy theory. Idiocy only serves to reinforce it, by leading the unconvinced to believe "Truthers" are all insane.
crimethink
25th July 2015, 08:19 PM
The nuclear weapons in the basement were confirmed as 'loud booms' by first responders and thoose videos were pretty much scrubbed. No clue if they were nuclear but were confirmed as loud booms.
Do you understand the effects of even a very low-yield nuclear weapon? It is certainty any explosions were not nuclear in nature. Were they, NUDET satellites would have went wild from the neutron burst (neutrons aren't stopped by concrete or steel or dirt), the radiation would have induced immediate radiation sickness for most (not later cancers), and the Towers would have toppled, not pancaked from placed charges.
crimethink
25th July 2015, 08:25 PM
There are numerous sound bites of people on the ground seeing the second plane but realising it was grey in colour and without windows.
The planes were almost certainly not United or American Airlines airliners. One was probably a remote-control-equipped US Air Force or CIAirlines contract KC-46, the military tanker version of the civilian 767, with few windows. The "757" was similar.
crimethink
25th July 2015, 08:27 PM
Pilots also say planes cannot fly this fast at ground level.
Who? Do you think they were doing Mach 1+? As air is more dense at low altitude, throttles shoved forward results in lower speed than at altitude, but nonetheless, plenty fast to smash right through the outer skin of the Towers.
Have you ever seen pieces of wood shoved all the way through trees by a hurricane?
Serpo
25th July 2015, 08:35 PM
Who? Do you think they were doing Mach 1+? As air is more dense at low altitude, throttles shoved forward results in lower speed than at altitude, but nonetheless, plenty fast to smash right through the outer skin of the Towers.
Have you ever seen pieces of wood shoved all the way through trees by a hurricane?
Dream on..............
crimethink
25th July 2015, 08:43 PM
Dream on..............
https://www.nasa.gov/images/content/116676main_plank_palm_lg.jpg http://drjudywood.com/articles/erin/spics/1992andrew6.gif
Name the pilots who claim what you allege.
PatColo
25th July 2015, 09:14 PM
These absurd videos are concocted by tools of the System to disseminate doubt in and scorn of "9/11 Truthers."
9/11 was an engineered event, but making shit up about "holograms," "nuclear weapons in the basement," and so on serves solely to reinforce, not discredit, the official story.
^ that's my take on "NP@WTC" chatter too, fleshed out in fuller detail @
Thread: Critical of JFetzer & JFriend's No Planes @ WTC campaign (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?71312-Critical-of-JFetzer-amp-JFriend-s-No-Planes-WTC-campaign)
Conspiracy hobby-ism, not conspiracy activism seeking to reach noobs and get some real momentum behind reversing the satanic agendas behind said conspiracies. "Let's all expend our energies chasing our tails in an infighting ditch over exotic "HOW 911 was done" theories, rather than expending the same energies outreaching to noobs..."
I don't know if this NP@WTC biz "reinforces" the 911 OCT, but it does serve to cause well programmed blue pill noobs, like Pavlov's dogs, to dismiss all "Truthers"... I suspect the same agenda is behind the "everything's fake" subset of truthers... flat earth, satellites are fake, nuke bombs/energy are fake, etc; epitomized by the likes of Fakeologist.com. The "flat earth movement" is especially toxic, coz "flat-earther" has been for decades, an engineered meme dismissing "conspiracy theorists"--- and may serve to turn well programmed sheeple's minds off even quicker than the "conspiracy theorist" label. And I say that, while also "allowing for the possibility" that the flat earthers are correct... it just boils down to a question of pragmatism, effectiveness, in outreaching to noobs re 911.
paraphrasing a comment made by JFetzer who attributed it to CIA, "...the goal of disinfo is not so much causing people to believe the wrong things, as much as the goal is creating a 'reality' for people, where everything is 'possible', but nothing is 'knowable'." (...thereby causing a deer in the headlights paralysis preventing people from actually doing anything in opposition to the satanic agendas in play).
madfranks
25th July 2015, 09:28 PM
Dream on..............
The twin towers featured what is known as a skeleton frame, which means the buildings had a relatively thin frame of steel columns and beams with curtain walls spanning between the "bones" of the building. Like Crimethink said, it's not a solid hunk of steel the plane went in to; by percentage most of the facade was glass, and it's entirely plausible for a plane to sink into it.
Shami-Amourae
25th July 2015, 09:30 PM
Parody of what happened on 9/11:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt_tv7t79WY
PatColo
25th July 2015, 09:50 PM
The twin towers featured what is known as a skeleton frame, which means the buildings had a relatively thin frame of steel columns and beams with curtain walls spanning between the "bones" of the building. Like Crimethink said, it's not a solid hunk of steel the plane went in to; by percentage most of the facade was glass, and it's entirely plausible for a plane to sink into it.
I should note, as I already did in
Thread: Critical of JFetzer & JFriend's No Planes @ WTC campaign (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?71312-Critical-of-JFetzer-amp-JFriend-s-No-Planes-WTC-campaign)
...that Fetzer, in making his NP@WTC case, long dismissed boeing planes as being "flying (aluminum...) beer cans", without mentioning their titanium frames & engines... something not found in "beer cans".
'sides, I figure what hit wtc were some sort of modified & specialized mil aircraft, not standard 767s. There is/was the apparent problems with standard aircraft flying at ~500 mph at near-sea level where the air is too thick for normal passenger jets to fly that speed. Thus, modified special mil aircraft. :)
slvrbugjim
25th July 2015, 11:09 PM
Who? Do you think they were doing Mach 1+? As air is more dense at low altitude, throttles shoved forward results in lower speed than at altitude, but nonetheless, plenty fast to smash right through the outer skin of the Towers.
Have you ever seen pieces of wood shoved all the way through trees by a hurricane?
Have you ever
seen thousands of tons of steel and concrete turned to vapor, only a nuclear event will do that and if it was a nuclear event it is not a bad thing, low yield nuclear devices are the largest programs of Israel for the last 20 years in Dimona
http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2014/06/911-nuclear-attack/
crimethink
25th July 2015, 11:31 PM
Parody of what happened on 9/11:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt_tv7t79WY
Hilarious!
But not so hilarious...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=384CCzUKHtA
crimethink
25th July 2015, 11:35 PM
Have you ever
seen thousands of tons of steel and concrete turned to vapor
Microfine dust =/= "vapor"
only a nuclear event will do that
Insisting on this bullshit only serves to make anyone seriously interested in exposing the truths of 9/11 look like lunatics. Good job, goy!
crimethink
25th July 2015, 11:49 PM
A little-known docudrama from 2012, which portrays likely happenings behind 9/11:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NzgRfN1f-M
Unfortunately, the movie is not easy to come by, but is available at https://kat.cr/operation-terror-2012-mp4-t10108666.html .
Neuro
26th July 2015, 01:57 AM
And the wing tips are made of very fragile stuff butt they seem to cut through metal and steel.
Pilots also say planes cannot fly this fast at ground level.
Water skiers at more than 35 knots says that falling is like landing on tarmac. The pilots said that about accelerating to that speed at ground level. Maintaining that speed while diving down to ground level is a different issue.
But really you are arguing the same thing, the dynamics of the material changes at high speed momentum, air that really feels like nothing when you are out for a stroll on a windless day, becomes like a wall at 500 mph. A semisolid wall becomes like butter when a plane hits it at 500 mph...
aeondaze
26th July 2015, 02:52 AM
The thing is, this whole topic could be complete disinformation used to discredit and distract, none of us really know. The point is they have left us arguing over very specific and particular points which can never really be known.
The best approach is to start with the information that we DO have and which doesn't add up or make sense. In a normal criminal matter these would be the specific points of investigation because revealing and investigating these points in an unfettered fashion WILL definitely yield results, this is what they're trying to avoid at all costs and the very reason why judge Hellenstien threw out all the civil suits brought by the aggrieved families and possibly the reason so many of the surviving families of the victims died in controversial circumstances.
When you realise you're dealing with this you know that the truth will never be known, unless there is some miraculous political change and is actually proof itself that the whole event stinks to high heaven.
We can argue about the minutia of that fateful day till hell freezes over, but the fact is there IS a coverup of grand proportions and that in and of itself is ALL the proof one needs to know that the guilty party has gotten off Scott free and still holds the reigns of power within the US political and financial establishment.
:rolleyes:
PatColo
26th July 2015, 03:47 AM
Insisting on this bullshit only serves to make anyone seriously interested in exposing the truths of 9/11 look like lunatics. Good job, goy!
The main fallacy injected by the contrived 'Nano-thermite, OR Mini-nukes, OR Seekrit energy weapons' waste of time, is the false dichotomy/binary suggested. If I were the 911 perps, I'd have multiple redundant means in place for ensuring the successful demolitions of 1, 2, & 7.
[...] very reason why judge Hellenstien threw out all the civil suits brought by the aggrieved families and possibly the reason so many of the surviving families of the victims died in controversial circumstances.
Mobbed-up US “justice” system delivers 9/11 injustice (http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/08/02/mobbed-up-us-justice-system-delivers-911-injustice/)
^ also the reason, I figure, for why djooz moved to all crisis actors for their more recent "tragedy" hoaxes... all the survivors who don't take the Feinberg-911 Compensation Fund bribe bait to shut up (Feinberg also administered the post BP/Gulf compensation fund); can be quite noisy & inconvenient for the perps to make go away. All crisis actors = no noisy/inconvenient lawsuits.
Shami-Amourae
26th July 2015, 07:16 AM
We can argue about the minutia of that fateful day till hell freezes over, but the fact is there IS a coverup of grand proportions and that in and of itself is ALL the proof one needs to know that the guilty party has gotten off Scott free and still holds the reigns of power within the US political and financial establishment.
:rolleyes:
Kevin Smith basically called that. He basically says, "give up", since the power structure already won on the issue:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vg7pJWD31O4
...Then he sorts of changes his mind.
Kevin seems to know whats up. He's just scared to anger his Jewish Hollywood pay-masters.
BrewTech
26th July 2015, 07:25 AM
Dream on..............
He's right, actually.
aeondaze
26th July 2015, 07:40 AM
Kevin Smith basically called that. He basically says, "give up", since the power structure already won on the issue:
...Then he sorts of changes his mind.
Kevin seems to know whats up. He's just scared to anger his Jewish Hollywood pay-masters.
I'm not advocating either giving up or not giving up. In fact, I suspect it may not be a matter of choice anyhow, things just are what they are.
The truth is the political class did everything in their power to negate any real investigation criminal or otherwise into the matter. They are the same political class that the vast majority of 'voters', 'citizens' or 'people' (call them what you like) have lost complete faith in due to a whole raft of other unrelated issues. This is where the rubber meets the road.
These same people choose not to think about ANY viable alternatives for a myriad of weak reason that are mostly based around self interests, whether you get pork from .gov with your EBT card or your bazillion dollar .gov contract or because you simply want what you think you're entitled to upon retirement.
These are the same issues that allow the criminal/political overlords to stifle western civilisation and drain every last ounce of freedom and liberty from it. We think its just a matter of figuring out whether a plane actually hit the twin towers or if it was a ballistic missile that hit the pentagram, but the truth is even if the majority knew the truth they would probably choose not to rock the boat and disrupt the status quo because collectively they're weak and cannot fathom missing out on their entitlements.
I know its sad and depressing and it sucks and I wish it weren't so, but that doesn't change the fact that this is ultimately what really drives both the low and higher level plebs.
Shami-Amourae
26th July 2015, 07:52 AM
Good points aeondaze. I was partially pointing out that Kevin Smith is paid off in the video I linked. A large percentage of the population is paid off too. It's only a fringe of people who aren't who are pulling their hair out wondering why they can provide a ton of information to family, and friends and people just don't "wake up". It builds frustration, apathy, and hopelessness.
We spend more time infighting with anonymous usernames online since of this.
aeondaze
26th July 2015, 08:20 AM
A large percentage of the population is paid off too. It's only a fringe of people who aren't who are pulling their hair out wondering why they can provide a ton of information to family, and friends and people just don't "wake up". It builds frustration, apathy, and hopelessness.
We spend more time infighting with anonymous usernames online since of this.
I've come to the conclusion that everyone is paid off in some form or other, they all think they have some kind of skin in the game and fight tooth and nail to preserve as much of the edifice we call 'civilisation' even when on principal they disagree with every last detail, it all just comes down to money and safety for them.
But we here are a different breed, we know its all just an illusion and that they can pull the rug from underneath every one of us in a nanosecond and in all likelihood eventually will, therefore we've come to the conclusion that there may as well be an honest fight even if it means sacrificing all the illusionary promises they've made to us and it takes a big leap of faith to come to that conclusion.
Most people get depressed when they even consider for a brief moment that most of everything they've been fed since childhood is a crock of shit and this is what holds them back. I see it all the time and you probably do to.
Me? I feel free of their perverse mind games and caustic imposition of supposed status signifiers, to me the absolute intellectual and personal freedom I experience is thoroughly invigorating and easily worth jettisoning all their psychobabble and their absurd intellectual demands. Fuck 'em I say, and it feels oh so good and liberating! I recommend it for everyone but I suspect a lot are just too caught up in what is expected to set themselves free.
;)
Jewboo
26th July 2015, 08:35 AM
http://files.tested.com/photos/2014/09/11/67603-kingkong7620.jpg
You guys see this security camera #37 footage from 9-10-2001 the night before? Entered into evidence by Larry Silverstein when he sued for damages.
:)
PatColo
26th July 2015, 10:16 AM
I've come to the conclusion that everyone is paid off in some form or other, they all think they have some kind of skin in the game and fight tooth and nail to preserve as much of the edifice we call 'civilisation' even when on principal they disagree with every last detail, it all just comes down to money and safety for them.
I could post this in several appropriate threads, but esp this allegedly "Catholic Priest" joo, "Monsignor Weiss" of Sandy Hoax, neck deep in pedo crimes, fit's ur description:
http://memoryholeblog.com/2015/07/24/st-rose-of-lima-parish-calls-911-on-wolfgang-halbig/
Jewboo
26th July 2015, 10:36 AM
We can argue about the minutia of that fateful day till hell freezes over, but the fact is there IS a coverup of grand proportions and that in and of itself is ALL the proof one needs to know that the guilty party has gotten off Scott free and still holds the reigns of power within the US political and financial establishment.
http://www.mouseplanet.info/gallery/d/136776-1/FourSeasons_groundbreaking-disney.jpg
Mickey Mouse joins (left to right) Larry Silverstein, president and CEO of Silverstein Properties, Meg Crofton, president, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Operations, U.S. and France, and Kathleen Taylor, president and CEO of Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts, at ground breaking for the new Four Seasons Resort.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02177/janymingay_2177060b.jpg
Dick Cheney recovering from heart transplant
The 71-year-old underwent the major surgery in a hospital outside Washington DC after a 20-month wait for a heart from an anonymous donor for which Mr Cheney said he would be "forever grateful".Mr Cheney has suffered five heart attacks – the first at the age of 37 - undergoing a quadruple bypass in 1988, receiving a pacemaker in 2001 and most recently in 2010 an implanted pump to keep him alive as a temporary measure.A statement released by Mr Cheney's office said he was "recovering" from the surgery which has had an increasingly high success rate in recent years, including among older patients, with 75 per cent of recipients surviving for five years."Although the former vice president and his family do not know the identity of the donor, they will be forever grateful for this lifesaving gift," the statement added.
https://ivarfjeld.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/bibi2.jpg?w=551
"I can nano-nuke your Vatican building like 9-11 too...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm5Je73bYOY
:rolleyes:
Norweger
26th July 2015, 10:54 AM
It's a matter of mass x velocity...doesn't matter if the airplane was made of plastic. That much energy will punch through. Further, the building was not all steel. That large aircraft, likely US Air Force or CIAirlines contract jets, actually were employed against the Towers is reasonable, and factual.
What is in question is:
1) who orchestrated it;
2) who, or what, flew the planes (e.g., remote control);
3) was anyone actually aboard the planes;
4) who placed the charges within the Towers prior to the plane impacts;
5) who planted the "impossible artifacts" like the infamous passport after the fact.
Those are key to unraveling the official conspiracy theory. Idiocy only serves to reinforce it, by leading the unconvinced to believe "Truthers" are all insane.
If the videos are all fakes or bad cgi then the question of who flew the planes, what planes etc are irrelevant.
Who orchestrated the event? Easy. Just look at who benefited. International Jewry and it's helpers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upvTSznpozc
crimethink
26th July 2015, 11:22 AM
If the videos are all fakes or bad cgi then the question of who flew the planes, what planes etc are irrelevant.
Please take note of my comment: " 4) who placed the charges within the Towers prior to the plane impacts"
The planes, which were real, were a distraction. Controlled demolition charges were clearly placed in the Towers prior to 9/11. The planes alone would have caused catastrophic damage to the upper floors, but would not have caused the Towers' collapse. The pancaking collapse was due to placed charges.
Who orchestrated the event? Easy. Just look at who benefited. International Jewry and it's helpers.
We know "Israel" was involved to one extent or another. Did "they" do it? That is still uncertain. Did they "help"? Almost certainly.
Goyish American corporate interests have benefited as greatly as any Jew from 9/11.
Jewboo
5th February 2016, 03:38 PM
(no planes...)
https://imgur.com/gallery/kbuuxdv
:rolleyes:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.