Did you know about the CANCER ACT 1939?

[Serpo]

Health Did you know about the CANCER ACT 1939?

Has anybody heard of “The Cancer Act” that was introduced in 1939? (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/2-3/13/contents)
It does appear that not many people know anything about it, yet many thousands of people have, and will continue to suffer from it’s effects.
Basically, it is a particularly restrictive and pernicious piece of legislation which prevents people from writing or speaking about the FACT that it is indeed possible to cure cancer using alternative methods.
The Cancer Act may also be the reason why many websites and blogs are now being threatened with fines of up to £1000, simply for alerting people to the very real dangers associated with conventional treatments.
http://topinfopost.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/wpid-quackery.jpeg
If you do even the most basic research, you will find that among the excuses that have been put forward for the introduction of this act, was to ‘Protect the public from Quackery and Charlatans,’ but it now appears far more likely, to ensure that all types of cancers, were only to be treated by ‘Radium-Based’ methods (Cancer Inducing Radiation).
It may have also been seen, as being necessary to introduce such an act to protect the profits of Pharmaceutical companies, as in 1938, there were people only too aware of the risks and were offering people viable alternatives. – outlawjimmy.com
http://topinfopost.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/wpid-screenshot_2014-03-22-11-21-32-1.png
SECURE LINK TO ORIGINAL DOCUMENT (https://www.dropbox.com/s/t7nbyzip4nk87s0/Cancer%20Act%201939.pdf)




http://topinfopost.com/2014/04/03/did-you-know-about-the-cancer-act-1939

[crimethink]

Capitalist "democracy" in action.

Meanwhile, in "evil Nazi" land...

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/51/German_anti-smoking_ad.jpeg/300px-German_anti-smoking_ad.jpeg

http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2013/volume_5/number_2/imgs/motherhood_smoking.gif

"Evil Nazi" Germany attacked the Capitalist tobacco industry which then, as today, continues to place profit before human beings.

"Evil Nazi" Germany attacked the industrial "food" corporations, and promoted natural food & cures, such as natural apple cider.

"Evil Nazi" Germany promoted, under the direction of Deputy Führer Rudolf Heß, Reichsminister Walther Darré, and Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler, production of Steiner's Biodynamic farming and the production of herbal remedies on a mass scale.


Aren't we so glad that the Capitalist "democracies" won World War II? Why, just think of what "evil" we would have today in the world, all the quackery that "Evil Nazis" promoted... (look at my avatar yet again - Western Civilization did, indeed, ask for this...)

[Glass]

yes I get "annoyed" with the cancer charity fund raising that goes on these days. A complete waste of time and energy. Walks against cancer, ribbons for leukemia, give $$ to pink breasts and all sorts of other stuff. The cancer fund raising industry is a massive massive money making fraudulent empire.

And meanwhile people die unnecessary agonising deaths. And everyone else thinks that they are helping by fund raising.

Have you noticed, just like 1984, every week there is a new potential medical discovery. Something that will change this or cure that. Lots of hope that in time it will do something. But then next week there is a new medical miracle discovery and the next week and the next. Pay closer attention to this and I guarantee you will begin to see it as well.

Chocolate rations have increased from 30 grams to 25 grams. Boot production is up from 300,000 pairs to 250,000 pairs. New health miracle will cure everything... in 5 or 6 years from now.

[crimethink]

yes I get "annoyed" with the cancer charity fund raising that goes on these days. A complete waste of time and energy. Walks against cancer, ribbons for leukemia, give $$ to pink breasts and all sorts of other stuff. The cancer fund raising industry is a massive massive money making fraudulent empire.

And meanwhile people die unnecessary agonising deaths. And everyone else thinks that they are helping by fund raising.

The American Cancer Society is exactly as its name implies: a society for cancer (they made an honest decision in 1944 when they changed their name to the current from the original, "American Society for the Control of Cancer"). They stomp on any "alternative" therapies as quickly as possible, funneling the non-squandered portion of donations to corporate "research." When I was "involved" in that organization years ago, the "leadership" promised huge reductions in cancer by 2015, just give more, volunteer more! You should have seen the incredibly lavish parties (they called them "team-building conferences") at upscale locales with plenty of good food and amenities. Since then I have told people to not give a single cent to any national "charity." If one feels the call to donate to a charity, I tell them to find a local one, where you can observe what happens with your money, and give directly. ACS' competitor, the Jewish "Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation," is similar. And the "United Way" is another scam - never donate "through" them.

The Jewish CEO, the little sister of Susan Komen, was making $684,000/year as head of that "charity," and a fuss was made, rightly, about it:

http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/10/18869742-susan-komen-ceos-salary-draws-fire-as-donations-drop-races-are-canceled

[Glass]

just while we are kicking charities, can I submit my nomination for possible most corrupt charity, and yes I admit they have a lot of competiont. The Red Cross. The Rod Schield.

Australians donated $900 million AUD's to the Ache Tsunami catastrophe, which was then misappropriated by the Red Cross. On the weekend I am reading about the USA Red Cross and the money donated to Haiti. Gone. $500 millions of USD's. No one knows where.


David Meltzer, the Red Cross' general counsel and head of the international division, says the charity helped millions through trying and difficult circumstances, including a cholera outbreak and a government in disarray.

But anyway, lI digress. Back to that bastard Jack Dancer.

[crimethink]

just while we are kicking charities, can I submit my nomination for possible most corrupt charity, and yes I admit they have a lot of competiont. The Red Cross. The Rod Schield.

Australians donated $900 million AUD's to the Ache Tsunami catastrophe, which was then misappropriated by the Red Cross. On the weekend I am reading about the USA Red Cross and the money donated to Haiti. Gone. $500 millions of USD's. No one knows where.

The various Red Cross societies have embezzled money on a grand scale. The ones which haven't are the exceptions.

[palani]

So in 1939 England recognized 'cancer' as a commercial term that required protection and regulation.

The same thing happened with the organic food movement in the U.S. of A. The movement was highjacked by commercial interests.

Rather than use the commercially protected term 'cancer' I would suggest 'growth' is a phrase that has not been engaged in commerce.

Rather than use the commercially protected term 'organic' as applied to nutrition I would suggest 'less crappy' is a phrase that has not been engaged in commerce.

[Glass]

So in 1939 England recognized 'cancer' as a commercial term that required protection and regulation.

The same thing happened with the organic food movement in the U.S. of A. The movement was highjacked by commercial interests.

Rather than use the commercially protected term 'cancer' I would suggest 'growth' is a phrase that has not been engaged in commerce.

Rather than use the commercially protected term 'organic' as applied to nutrition I would suggest 'less crappy' is a phrase that has not been engaged in commerce.

but what if you had an organic garden that was fertilized by chicken scratchings and droppings? Would that be 'less crappy' or 'more crappy'? Or maybe drop the y and just call it 'best crap'. In any event what you say makes sense. They 'manage' only the things they claim domain over. Sure government management is a misnomer, but they do try.

[palani]

They 'manage' only the things they claim domain over.

Since they use words to exercise their policy and control then words are the way to avoid regulation.

Years ago when I wanted the mercury fillings removed from my teeth I approached my dentist. He asked why I wanted to change fillings. I told him to get the mercury out. He informed me that he could pull them out if my reason for doing so was 'a pretty smile' but had been instructed by his dental association (professional oversite) that removing mercury was not a reason. I told him I wanted a pretty smile.

They tell you what the requirements are. Avoid those requirements.

If you go to traffic court you are there for commercial reasons ... a trade


traffic (n.)
c. 1500, "trade, commerce," from Middle French trafique (15c.), from Italian traffico (14c.), from trafficare "carry on trade,"
traffic (v.)
1540s, "to buy and sell,"

If you get hauled in anyway and they claim 'you were on a public road' ...


Public road.— The term “public road” means any road or street under the jurisdiction of and maintained by a public authority and open to public travel.

maybe you should suggest instead that you were on a tribal transport facility (if that is where you choose to be).


Tribal transportation facility.— The term “tribal transportation facility” means a public highway, road, bridge, trail, or transit system that is located on or provides access to tribal land and appears on the national tribal transportation facility inventory described in section 202 (b)(1).