PDA

View Full Version : New Federal Law Negates all State/Local GMO Labeling Laws



Shami-Amourae
29th July 2015, 10:19 AM
https://8ch.net/pol/res/2772535.html#2772535
https://seeker401.wordpress.com/2015/07/29/the-passage-of-the-dark-act-shows-the-arrogance-of-us-politicians/

On July 23, 2015, the United States House of Representatives voted upon and passed (by a 275-150 majority) H.R. 1599, the so-called “Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015,” otherwise known as the DARK Act.

The DARK Act is a more accurate description of the bill – which must now be taken up by the Senate – as the acronym “Deny Americans the Right to Know” more aptly tells us what Congress is doing here: Negating all existing and future GMO labeling laws at State and local levels so that consumers will not be able to make an informed choice as well as eliminating numerous non-Federal laws regulating genetically engineered crops.


In particular, the DARK Act – if passed by the Senate and signed into law by Obama – will:


Preempt State and local laws regarding the production and sale of GMO crops, not just the labeling of GMO foods;
Eliminate “GMO-Free” zones;
Unfairly burden traditional farmers and food producers to label their food as “GMO-free,” requiring certification from the pro-GMO USDA;
Further muddy the food definition of “Natural,” allowing companies to make “natural” claims on packaging even if the food contains GMOs; and
Allow dairy products from animals fed bioengineered foods and foods developed using bioengineered processing aids or enzymes to still be labeled as non-bioengineered.


Although touted as a means of ending a “confusing patchwork” of GMO labeling laws, the DARK Act is really nothing more than camouflage for the removal of Americans’ right to know what is in their food and drink. The Act ends the “confusing patchwork” in the same way that Attila the Hun ended the “confusing patchwork” of tribes in his sweeping path: He just annihilated them. We need real GMO labeling so that we can all make informed food choices.


The many Republicans and few Democrats who voted for this Act should be ashamed, while the many Democrats and few Republicans who voted against it are to be commended. It was the triumph of moneyed interests over the wishes of the voters. More than 90% of Americans have demanded mandatory GMO labeling, as shown by every substantial poll taken. Even Republican voters have expressed an 89% support for mandatory labeling. Yet, Congress – including my long-time friend Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), who voted for the bill – has ignored this overwhelming support for clear GMO labels. Ironically enough, many of NHF’s long-time health-freedom opponents in Congress voted on the right side of this issue. (See https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/114-2015/h462)


The U.S. Senate is the next battleground here. Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) is preparing his own GMO labeling bill, which appears to be no improvement over the House version. Still, the Senate will consider the DARK Act or Senator Hoeven’s bill, or even perhaps another, more consumer-friendly bill in the near future. It is up to us to make this happen as you can be sure that the GMO industry (Monsanto) will not be idle in peddling its influence into the darkest corners of Capitol Hill.

Ares
29th July 2015, 10:56 AM
Congress can make all the laws that it wants.. Why should the states abide by them?

monty
29th July 2015, 11:35 AM
Because groceries, meat and produce are transported interstate, the feds have jurisdiction.

7th trump
29th July 2015, 11:36 AM
Congress can make all the laws that it wants.. Why should the states abide by them?

Because the "state of XXXXXX" is a federal entity.
"The state of XXXXXX" is where all the federal "US citizens" reside. US citizens must obey the laws and regulations of Congress.

Now "Iowa", as in one of the union states, is not the same as "The state of Iowa". "Iowa" has State citizens (The People) who are not "US citizens".
Which one are you?

This what I was trying to get midnight ramble butt to come t oa conclusion to a while back....he couldnt because he doesnt know his ass from a hole in the ground. Then Palani showed up with his usual run around bullshit circle jerk speak to try and defend him because after all it was palani who filled midnights head with garbage.

Neither has a clue!

7th trump
29th July 2015, 11:38 AM
Because groceries, meat and produce are transported interstate, the feds have jurisdiction.

Not exactly true!

What makes you fall within federal jurisdiction.
A State citizen can buy groceries from the store and yet not be subject. The interstate has nothing to do with "you" falling in federal jurisdiction.

Why is that?

monty
29th July 2015, 11:47 AM
The state citizen making the purchase is not subject to the federal labeling law. The food processor is because the product may enter into interstate commerce.

Heisenberg
29th July 2015, 12:32 PM
Because groceries, meat and produce are transported interstate, the feds have jurisdiction.
In California I can get a majority of food from within the state.

monty
29th July 2015, 01:26 PM
Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_citation) (1942), was a United States Supreme Court (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States) decision that dramatically increased the power of the federal government to regulate economic activity.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn
The U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause, the Supreme Court, and Public HealthThis report is 15 pages of how the the feds have encroached using the commerce clause and the Supreme Court upholding their actions.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3151195/

Lainie Rutkow, JD, PhD, MPH and Jon S. Vernick, JD, MPH

Jewboo
29th July 2015, 01:39 PM
https://8ch.net/pol/src/1438187957441.png