View Full Version : 44 dead, over 500 injured, after blast rocks busy Chinese port
Serpo
13th August 2015, 01:04 AM
MASSIVE ,BIG, HUGE , LARGE EXPLOSION.........
http://www.rt.com/news/312292-china-tianjin-massive-blast/
Two blasts shook the northeastern Chinese city of Tianjin late on Wednesday. Some 500 people have been injured, and 44 are dead, according to the latest report by Xinhua news agency.
A total of nine firefighters have been confirmed dead, according to Chinese state television. It is unclear if that number is included in the total death toll. Authorities have reportedly lost contact with 36 other firefighters, according to Beijing News.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZDStWwx-jk
http://images.indianexpress.com/2015/08/china9.jpg
Cars and windows 2ks away destroyed
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/12/asia/china-port-explosion/index.html
Glass
13th August 2015, 01:35 AM
I think there was a big splosion in Russia somewhere as well. Wonder if someone is trying to stink up the place.
Serpo
13th August 2015, 01:42 AM
Cant see anything in Russia
http://cdn.rt.com/files/2015.08/original/55cc40e5c461880b158b45d1.jpg
vid here shows guy standing in door way , then wooofhmmmm
http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/asia/71097109/video-the-chilling-moment-of-chinese-explosion
drone footage...................http://www.rt.com/news/312322-drone-tianjin-blasts-aftermath/
(http://www.rt.com/news/312322-drone-tianjin-blasts-aftermath/)
Serpo
13th August 2015, 02:16 AM
I guess they wont be devaluing their currency anymore..........
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=20&v=MHQPX2TJPQc
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=34687
Cebu_4_2
13th August 2015, 05:52 AM
That aint no pressure cooker explosion.
Serpo
13th August 2015, 06:45 AM
That aint no pressure cooker explosion.
What makes you say that.........................
http://totallycoolpix.com/images/tcp_images/1864/pic_aftermath_tianjin_014__tcp_gallery_image.jpght tp://totallycoolpix.com/images/tcp_images/1864/pic_aftermath_tianjin_038__tcp_gallery_image.jpght tp://totallycoolpix.com/images/tcp_images/1864/pic_aftermath_tianjin_045__tcp_gallery_image.jpg
http://www.rt.com/news/312333-china-blast-dead-injured/
BrewTech
13th August 2015, 08:50 AM
Considering the population density in China, doesn't "44 dead" seem a rather low number for an explosion that size? Granted, it was 11:30pm local time, but still.
Dogman
13th August 2015, 08:59 AM
Considering the population density in China, doesn't "44 dead" seem a rather low number for an explosion that size? Granted, it was 11:30pm local time, but still.
Took a look at earth view, that area is in a heavy industrial port area, not many people live directly in the area. Plus the port is several miles from any heavy population areas.
Horn
13th August 2015, 09:54 AM
What was it that caused something so large, were they storing vast quantities of LPG on site?
Its a shipping yard, no?
mick silver
13th August 2015, 05:02 PM
satellites, which picked up thermal signatures from the twin explosions
http://www.wired.com/2015/08/chinas-huge-tianjin-explosion-looked-like-space/
Serpo
13th August 2015, 09:57 PM
I think there was a big splosion in Russia somewhere as well. Wonder if someone is trying to stink up the place.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3196504/Frightening-footage-captures-fireball-plume-black-smoke-engulfing-Moscow-River-suspected-rupture-underwater-oil-pipeline.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/13/13/2B540D9600000578-0-image-a-26_1439468036266.jpg
River of flame: Fire erupts across Russian waterway and huge column of black smoke engulfs the area after underwater oil pipeline ruptures
Large fire erupted close to the site of an oil refinery on Moscow River
Plume of thick black smoke could be seen a mile away in Red Square
Rescue workers battled flames for over an hour to control the blaze
No fatalities were reported but three bystanders were taken to hospital
expat4ever
13th August 2015, 10:04 PM
Can we get the bible referrences for the end of days please. I know somewhere in the the oceans will turn to fire or something like that.
Cebu_4_2
13th August 2015, 10:06 PM
Can we get the bible referrences for the end of days please. I know somewhere in the the oceans will turn to fire or something like that.
That was lake erie in the '70s.
Horn
14th August 2015, 01:11 AM
8/13/2015
8+1+3+2-0+1+5 = 20 = 2
2x22 = 44
is all right there if you could only see it.
Serpo
14th August 2015, 04:20 AM
8/13/2015
8+1+3+2-0+1+5 = 20 = 2
2x22 = 44
is all right there if you could only see it.
Not inhaling kitty litter are we
Serpo
17th August 2015, 06:02 AM
Jim Stone.............
In case you did not know: To shut Trump up, they called him to jury duty and the trial will probably be stretched until after the election. That is how corruption functions, there is no legitimate election process in America.
The message window has not changed since the Hillary espionage story because that was the cutoff, incoming messages have been blocked. I have tried to resolve this but know the answer already: The espionage/China blast stories are so on the mark that they have to stop the message stream because they don't want any whistleblowers getting through with worse stuff. AND NOW THEY ARE (probably) HAARPING UP A VOLCANO IN JAPAN FOR THE PUNCH LINE.
August 16 2015
DEAD MEAT REVELATION: NO WAREHOUSE AT EPICENTER OF EXPLOSION
Official story a proven (call it "error" for now).
http://82.221.129.208/officialattack2.jpgAfter carefully poring over the images, it is now obvious that the actual epicenter of the explosion was nowhere near ANY WAREHOUSE AT ALL, and in fact happened across property owned by more than one shipping company. Ruihai was supposed to be blamed for this, but it is obvious at this point that they were not responsible for the blast. Now I really think it was a kinetic weapon that did this, because the big crater happened in the middle of nowhere at all, and targeting is probably very difficult to get perfect with that type of weapon. One thing is certain, this surely was NOT a warehouse blast, the closest warehouse was approximately 100 yards away. The explosion was actually closest to their security gate and whatever other shipping companies surrounded Ruihai. The explosion was so massive that many many buildings have completely vanished, including all warehouses and storage areas owned by Ruihai and surrounding shipping companies, with only a concrete office building remaining (1 of 2). All others are completely gone without a trace. Selective deletion of buildings (based on what they are made of) is a hallmark indicator of a nuclear weapons type blast, and if this was a kinetic weapon, results are similar.
One thing is made obvious by the very up to date "before" image: there was nothing at the epicenter that could have exploded, something other than chemicals did this. And the scale of the blast proves it was definitely a multiple kiloton range blast, achievable ONLY BY A SUPER POWER NATION.
Now the only thing up to speculation is exactly why a superpower attacked China. Was it the currency devaluation? Hillary's espionage story in need of burial? You guess, at this point it is irrelevant, an attack is proven. August 15 2015
BLOCKBUSTER: LATEST IMAGES SHOW THE BLAST PRODUCED A THREE ACRE LAKE! The new lake in China proves a 5 http://82.221.129.208/rods.jpgkiloton blast, possibly nuclear or possibly from a space based "rod from God" (http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2004-06/rods-god) (pictured to the left) weapon DEPLOYED BY THE SPACE PLANE, DING DING DING DING DING!.
At first I doubted the "rod from God" because I have no explanation for how one could drop out of orbit and actually fall, but evidently this system is real and they solved that problem. That would make the rod from God the prime candidate here, because the Chinese could easily trace down a nuclear blast.
UPDATE: ANOTHER BLOCKBUSTER: Blasts were NOT RELATED, blast 1, the small blast, happened on the West side of the container lot, and was the crater everyone first saw with containers laying in it, thinking that was from the big blast. It was not. Blast 2, the lake making nuke type blast, happened on the East side of the container lot. The fire happened to the South of both blasts, approximately centered between them, and was ONLY A FIRE, there is no conceivable way it could produce blasts on both sides of a container lot, separated by over 200 yards. The materials in question simply could not do it. The warehouse that was supposedly holding whatever exploded was erased by the large (rod from God or nuclear) blast, as was everything else around that blast.
The crater pictures people posted previously were from the small blast, not the big one, a new picture http://82.221.129.208/rodfromgod.jpg which clearly shows where the big blast went off just got released by China. After looking through the images of the soviet nuclear tests, the new lake in China appears to have been made by a slightly sub surface burst of at least a 5 kiloton nuclear bomb. There is no way the earthquake from this was in the 2's. Take a look at the pond made by a test of a small nuclear weapon ground burst in Russia and compare it to that new lake in China, which is many times as big as the pond made by a nuclear test in Russia!
Now we have limited options for this blast, since nothing stored there could have possibly done this. This was NOT an accident and the fracture pattern aroundhttp://82.221.129.208/nuclake.jpg the crater proves a sub ground burst. If it was a sub ground burst,then a small nuclear weapon is a possibility because once a nuke has to push dirt, the blinding flash will not happen. A slightly subsurface detonation would explain why camera sensors did not get strange artifacts. And if it was not a nuke, it was something else incredibly huge, the fracture patterns around the crater (now a lake) also support a meteor type impact, (rod from God) but not a fuel air bomb because fuel air bombs will not leave craters.
A little bit more of a detailed explanation: If the blast happened at ground level, almost all of the energy would go upwards and the blast would not have made a largehttp://82.221.129.208/chinablast.jpg deep crater, especially one large enough and deep enough to make that lake. If you look to the right hand side of the lake, you can see fracture patterns in the earth, which were caused by the earth being compressed sideways and not downwards. This would only be done with a sub surface blast. After the blast, the earth bounced back towards the center of the lake, which opened up the cracks.
Look closely at the ground around the lake. Those who claimed it was not a nuke cited the fact that if it was, everything around the crater would be vaporized and wiped clean. Now that we have the real crater pic from the big blast, YEP, it matches that perfectly. Take a look at the containers laying in the lower left corner of this picture - they have no paint or color, which means they had the surfaces incinerated by intense heat only a nuke or other super weapon would reach. If this was a carbide blast, they would be black or have their original colors to some degree, complete color change to only gray proves this explosion was FREAKING HOT. That type and size of blast crater will only happen if a massive bomb goes off a few feet underground, such as a tactical nuke in a drain pipe which leaves scant few alternative options (see Rod from God), No chemical blast did that, PERIOD. The building that is still standing in the upper right hand side of the frame is a typical example of what is left after a nuclear test, concrete buildings seldom get leveled, but they do get gutted by nuclear blasts. Just look through pictures of the soviet nuclear tests and you will see this. Bottom line? The aftermath is completely consistent with a nuclear blast.
I think a glue fire was started as an excuse for this huge blast, which came considerably later. And who knows what made the first big blast, or smaller blasts that led up to it, but I am confident it was a show and not an accident. They wanted this filmed from all angles and set up the show to make sure people would be recording when the big one went off. If there were lots of little blasts before that, why was there not a single small blast after the big one? That is when I would think the small blasts should have started if this entire scenario was not contrived from the start.
What would be the motive for this attack? I don't buy the currency devaluation, but something else very tasty was going on that a distraction was needed for, SUCH AS:...........................at link....Hildabeast
http://82.221.129.208/ab8index.html
cheka.
30th September 2015, 12:21 PM
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/09/30/444677740/series-of-parcel-explosions-reportedly-hit-guangxi-china
At Least 17 Parcel Bombs Explode In Guangxi, China
At least seven people are dead in Liucheng county in southern China after a series of powerful explosions that are being blamed on parcel bombs. As many as 17 explosions caused the damage in and around the city of Liuzhou, according to local media.
The blasts were strong enough to rip away portions of buildings and overturn cars. More than 50 people were reportedly injured.
cheka.
30th September 2015, 12:25 PM
http://www.ifreepress.com/series-of-explosions-kill-3-injure-13-in-southern-china-city/
“There were so many of them, and they were so loud, everyone in the county could hear them”, said a hotel employee who gave only his family name, Li. One photo of a building collapsed indicated that one side of entire building is now just caved inn suggesting that very massive chemical has been used for blasts.
“Initial investigation showed that explosives could be inside express delivery packages”, it added.
The Washington Post reported Chinese officials have identified a suspect, but the motive for the blasts is not yet known.
“All of us heard the blast”.
Footage of the devastation showed partly collapsed buildings and injured people receiving treatment on the street.
The Liucheng County public security bureau confirmed that the explosions occurred in 13 different places including a shopping mall, jail, supermarket, rail station, a hospital and an open air market.
StreetsOfGold
30th September 2015, 12:50 PM
satellites, which picked up thermal signatures from the twin explosions
http://www.wired.com/2015/08/chinas-huge-tianjin-explosion-looked-like-space/
anyone can make those images with very simple computer programs.
There is NO SUCH THING as "orbiting satellites" You'll only find them in places like the NASA movie studios or when in this "imaginary place" they call "outer space" they are always CGI generated (or drawings) since they have to be!
https://www.google.com/search?q=satellites&client=opera&hs=hWO&biw=1360&bih=670&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAmoVChMI1eCH-7WfyAIViRY-Ch1e3wQI
mick silver
30th September 2015, 05:24 PM
This technology is very far out--in miles and years. A pair of satellites orbiting several hundred miles above the Earth would serve as a weapons system. One functions as the targeting and communications platform while the other carries numerous tungsten rods--up to 20 feet in length and a foot in diameter--that it can drop on targets with less than 15 minutes' notice. When instructed from the ground, the targeting satellite commands its partner to drop one of its darts. The guided rods enter the atmosphere, protected by a thermal coating, traveling at 36,000 feet per second--comparable to the speed of a meteor. The result: complete devastation of the target, even if it's buried deep underground. (The two-platform configuration permits the weapon to be "reloaded" by just launching a new set of rods, rather than replacing the entire system.)
The concept of kinetic-energy weapons has been around ever since the RAND Corporation proposed placing rods on the tips of ICBMs in the 1950s; the satellite twist was popularized by sci-fi writer Jerry Pournelle. Though the Pentagon won't say how far along the research is, or even confirm that any efforts are underway, the concept persists. The "U.S. Air Force Transformation Flight Plan," published by the Air Force in November 2003, references "hypervelocity rod bundles" in its outline of future space-based weapons, and in 2002, another report from RAND, "Space Weapons, Earth Wars," dedicated entire sections to the technology's usefulness.
If so-called "Rods from God"--an informal nickname of untraceable origin--ever do materialize, it won't be for at least 15 years. Launching heavy tungsten rods into space will require substantially cheaper rocket technology than we have today. But there are numerous other obstacles to making such a system work. Pike, of GlobalSecurity.org, argues that the rods' speed would be so high that they would vaporize on impact, before the rods could penetrate the surface. Furthermore, the "absentee ratio"--the fact that orbiting satellites circle the Earth every 100 minutes and so at any given time might be far from the desired target--would be prohibitive. A better solution, Pike argues, is to pursue the original concept: Place the rods atop intercontinental ballistic missiles, which would slow down enough during the downward part of their trajectory to avoid vaporizing on impact. ICBMs would also be less expensive and, since they're stationed on Earth, would take less time to reach their targets. "The space-basing people seem to understand the downside of space weapons," Pike says--among them, high costs and the difficulty of maintaining weapon platforms in orbit. "But I'll still bet you there's a lot of classified work on this going on right now."
The Rods are just one of the world's spookiest weapons. Launch the entire gallery of terrifying weapons here (http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-space/gallery/2008-05/worlds-spookiest-weapons).
Glass
30th September 2015, 08:20 PM
I think these Rods from God are an interesting story. While it sounds all booga booga I'm not sure there is much in it.
First thing, how heavy are they? How do they get up there?
How are these things accelerating to 36,000 feet ps?
Are they rocket propelled?
Are they launching these from many miles above earth orbit?
Are they simply falling to earth and if so, again, how high up.
There is this thing called Terminal velocity. Anything that free falls will reach it's terminal velocity and that won't change for the remainder of the journey.
What would be the terminal velocity of a God Rod? It is subject to mass.
Because we don't know the mass, we can't determine the terminal velocity or the kinetic energy it would have, to transfer to the intended target.
I think Rods from God are a dubious thing.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.