Stonehenge Fake, built 100 years ago with cranes and concrete

[Glass]

This is by one of the guys from the FE arena. I enjoy his way of looking at things.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjmY5zak28o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjmY5zak28o

[Celtic Rogue]

Wrong... It was reconstructed from the ruins. The pictures of the cranes was from that time. LOL There are so many clues that they are still finding about the whole area.


http://youtu.be/8LGczCvCCu0

[aeondaze]

Wrong... It was reconstructed from the ruins. The pictures of the cranes was from that time. LOL There are so many clues that they are still finding about the whole area.


http://youtu.be/8LGczCvCCu0

Another thread that mysteriously pops up every now and then EVEN after being debunked on many occasions, makes one wonder sometimes about the people that consistently post this baloney time and time again. :rolleyes:

[Glass]

not having watched the video you wouldn't know that the reconstruction angle was covered. Even so, as it was "reconstructed from ruins", this means there is some amount of interpretation of what stonehenge is and how it was put together. It's incomplete and at best a guess and if it was, as we seem to agree, assembled recently, in some fashion. How long has it actually been standing? I think the logical extensions are not realistic but I think the stonehenge question is valid. How old is it really?

[aeondaze]

Its age makes PERFECT sense.

It makes perfect sense in terms of the known archaeological record for the area and period in question (late UK neolithic/early bronze age). Its makes perfect sense in terms of the dating of strata and materials associated with it. There are NO questions surrounding its specific antiquity. There may be a spread based on the different building phases but it certainly wasn't done in the 20the century!

I don't know what kind of shit you're smoking...:p

[Dogman]

Its age makes PERFECT sense.

It makes perfect sense in terms of the known archaeological record for the area and period in question (late UK neolithic/early bronze age). Its makes perfect sense in terms of the dating of strata and materials associated with it. There are NO questions surrounding its specific antiquity. There may be a spread based on the different building phases but it certainly wasn't done in the 20the century!

I don't know what kind of shit you're smoking...:pSorry I just can not resist !


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvGJvzwKqg0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvGJvzwKqg0


;)

[gunDriller]

Its age makes PERFECT sense.

It makes perfect sense in terms of the known archaeological record for the area and period in question (late UK neolithic/early bronze age). Its makes perfect sense in terms of the dating of strata and materials associated with it. There are NO questions surrounding its specific antiquity. There may be a spread based on the different building phases but it certainly wasn't done in the 20the century!

I don't know what kind of shit you're smoking...:p

In the Olde Days, it was called Skunk.

Now it's, Grape Cookies crossed with Lemon Kush, with Playdough Romulan Terpenes and a Dash of Wifi.

In other words, Skunk :)

[StreetsOfGold]

How old is it really?

If "THEY" say it's thousands of years old and even went so far as to have one of their their propaganda mouthpieces (National pornographic) do an hour and a half special to CEMENT this "fact" (in your mind) then you know one thing -

It's NOT thousands of years old!!

[BrewTech]

Bullshit. It was built "hundreds of years before the dawn of history".

Says so right here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAXzzHM8zLw

[EE_]

Bullshit. It was built "hundreds of years before the dawn of history".

Says so right here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qAXzzHM8zLw

brew, I sent you a PM to look at

[ximmy]

Stonehenge testifies that the Greeks were but children... (insert rolly eyes here)

[Ponce]

In the WWW type....Stonehenge being built......and it will take you to 1954....one step at a time, with photos.

V

[Norweger]

I like how one of the "rocks" is dissolving and revealing its inner content.

http://www.picture-newsletter.com/stonehenge/stonehenge-09.jpg

[Glass]

taking Ponces advice to google those key words you get quite a few hits including this before its news link that has the following plus more:

The author even provides some , as he calls them ” little known facts ” :

1. First near Stonehenge military exercises were held in 1898.
2 . From that time until the Second World War, the Ministry of Defence bought up large tracts of land in the area
3 . Currently, the Ministry of Defence owns 390 square kilometers (!) In the vicinity of Stonehenge , some of which are closed permanently to other access is severely limited . ( By Wikimapia border nearest military base – a mile from these stones to the north, and the military airstrip – 5 kilometers to the south- east).
4 . In the past, in the vicinity of Stonehenge were carried branch railway and airport, both were subsequently removed (there are other sources that the military airfield was much closer , at a distance of one mile from Stonehenge )
5 . In 1943 the village of Imber ( 15 kilometers from Stonehenge ) and village Par Hinton were evicted . In the article about Imber says that to this day the village is under the control of military
6. In 2 kilometers north of Stonehenge located Royal Artillery School , which conducts real shooting 340 (!) Days per year
7. At 9 kilometers south -east , with the military airfield , located Defence Science and Technology Laboratory , whose work is primarily classified.
8. Another 17 kilometers to the west of Stonehenge is a military base and the Air combat helicopter airport ” Apaches “
9. In the area of Stonehenge is not conducted agricultural activities because of the danger of running into a dud , which for centuries has accumulated a lot. Because of this, green meadows around Stonehenge acquired scientific value (Site of Special Scientific Interest) as are the latest natural lawns in England , perhaps – and throughout Europe .
So, to summarize :
- Stonehenge around for over 100 years – closed area , guarded by the military patrolled by military aircraft and helicopters , with daily artelleristskimi firings.
- Local residents evicted during the Second World War, under the pretext of exercises; villages took control of the military, the situation persists to this day.
- Selkohozyaystvennaya activity over large areas of the plains , where the Stonehenge prohibited
- On the territory there was an infrastructure that enables large-scale construction (including airports, railway line ) , which was later abolished as unnecessary
Perhaps a more suitable place for the construction of Stonehenge was hard to find … “
In other words, everything is clear. On the territory protected by the British War Department , consciously and purposefully been erected this ” center of ancient civilization “, ” heritage of the great ancestors ,” ” Monument of Humanity” , which became (not by itself , clearly put ) the most important religious center at least deliberately inculcated ” spirituality ” .
There is no doubt that the most ” heritage of humanity ” and ” spirituality ” , is an important attribute of this means ” heritage ” and ” science ” that unfolded around thereof ” heritage ” colossal scale their “research” one customer .
p.s. So, what in your opinion, is shown in the photo – the restoration or construction of Stonehenge twin ?



Before its News (http://beforeitsnews.com/blogging-citizen-journalism/2013/12/shock-1954-photos-show-stonehenge-being-built-2449888.html)

Interesting question right there at the end which raises another possibility.
a) Restoration work
b) New creation
c) "making something up" from a pile of old rocks that became this monument
d) is a replica of the real monument which is secured somewhere on the military grounds inaccessible to the public.

I'm thinking most likely b. or c. however d. had not occurred to me. A doubtful option at this time IMO.

[ximmy]

Take a last look, kids...

...at one of man's most curious creations.

Built to stand the test of time
and the elements.

War. You name it.

A thing of glory
for a million future generations to see.

And we were here.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DewEKz9TzmM

[ximmy]

In Henry’s Historia Anglorum, written about 1130, Stonehenge is the second of the four wonders of England. The first is the great cave of Wookey Hole in the Mendips, the third winds issuing from caverns in the Peak, the fourth a not very clearly explained phenomenon of the atmosphere. Henry is the first to mention its not altogether soluble name, in the form of “Stanenges”. In fact, his is the earliest record of Stonehenge. Antiquaries have fancied a reference to it in Diodorus Siculus. Drawing from lost accounts by Hecataeus of Abdera and others, he had written that the fabled Hyperboreans in their island in the north, next to Gaul, were supposed to have worshipped Apollo to the music of the cythera in what the antiquaries translated as a “circular” temple. Supposing that temple were Stonehenge, here at least would be a terminus a quo, since Hecataeus wrote in the fourth century B.C. Diodorus, though, did not say that the temple was circular. It was spherical, a temple in the shape of a ball. Legend may have solidified circle into sphere, but still it is with Henry, Archdeacon of Huntingdon, in 1130, that Stonehenge enters into history indisputably - See more at: http://www.historytoday.com/geoffrey....4EpqvrG4.dpuf (http://www.historytoday.com/geoffrey-grigson/stonehenge-and-imagination#sthash.4EpqvrG4.dpuf)

[singular_me]

hey aeon when are you going to join threads that expose the moral bankruptcy of sciences and which you never blast as a scientist (because you are mind controlled)?

right take on the stonehenge instead, it is easier.

debunk the pyramids and other confirmed ancient monuments when you get a chance.

It does not surprise me to hear about any possible fake historical fact, as much as the whole story about the pyramids is not told by the mainstream, stonehenge may be totally fake.



Another thread that mysteriously pops up every now and then EVEN after being debunked on many occasions, makes one wonder sometimes about the people that consistently post this baloney time and time again. :rolleyes:

[Horn]

If they were taken down originally by earthquake or glacial ice,

it would be a hopeful sign that London itself might suffer a similar fate.

[ximmy]

If they were taken down originally by earthquake or glacial ice,

it would be a hopeful sign that London itself might suffer a similar fate.

How profound of you...

And if Stonehenge damaged
Be it how or when or where
Then isn't the conclusion
That all roads lead to...

[Horn]

Where's Merlin when you need him?


Merlin grew impatient and used his magical powers to take down the stones himself and bring them here, then erected them again in exactly the same way as they had stood in Ireland. Kings Aurelius and Uther Pendragon are both said to have been buried here at Stonehenge , and Uther Pendragon’s sonwas of course the legendary king Arthur.

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/404.aspx?aspxerrorpath=/login.aspx

[singular_me]

PS:
It does not surprise me to hear about any possible fake historical fact, as much as the whole REAL story about the pyramids (for example) is not told by the mainstream, stonehenge may be fake or a restoration. disinfo works both ways


there still is a mystery though... why, if it is fake, building it on a ley line as there are plenty authentic sites built on them?

[Glass]

some people continually make statements without any references to support what they say. That makes it a belief and nothing more.

Also some people fail in even the most basic of comprehension. Often that is down to belief projection.

If some place, on earth, ie a portion of ground was covered by a pile of rocks, a tumble of rocks, if you will. How does standing those rocks up make it something other than a representation of someones imagination. Now, that imagination may have been written down on paper or even drawn as an image or representation. It might look more impressive that way but it doesn't change the fact that it came from someones imagination.

If old, centuries old drawings or sketches showed this area, place or portion of ground with these piles of rocks or similar rocks arranged in some way that is different to the arrangement of the rocks today then it's clear that this thing called Stonehenge of today is not the real thing. It would be a creation of someones ideas that were in their head not what was originally there. I might point out that what was originally (possibly) there came from someones imagination, just not the people from 50 or 60 years ago who appear to have assembled some rocks they found laying about into some structure that is not a millennia old stone henge.

[aeondaze]

some people continually make statements without any references to support what they say. That makes it a belief and nothing more.

Also some people fail in even the most basic of comprehension. Often that is down to belief projection.

I might point out that what was originally (possibly) there came from someones imagination, just not the people from 50 or 60 years ago who appear to have assembled some rocks they found laying about into some structure that is not a millennia old stone henge.

I agree with your first point and I'm glad that you see your musings as nothing more than your imagination. Its a pity you can't comprehend the archaeological period we're talking about though and refuse to see Stonehenge in CONTEXT to other contemporaneous neolithic structures

Skara Brae:

http://www.werner-forman-archive.com/Europe/55422539.jpg

lanyon Quoit

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/35/Lanyon_Quoit_-_geograph.org.uk_-_117634.jpg

Ring of Brodgar

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Ring_of_Brodgar_-_geograph.org.uk_-_70432.jpg

Ring of Dromberg

http://www.history.com/images/media/slideshow/neolithic-structures-in-the-ireland-and-the-united-kingom/Dromberg.jpg

Carreg Samson

http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/applied-sciences/local-assets/news-and-events/events/nov/carreg.jpg

There is PLENTY of proof this style of megalithic structure was being built around the same time, what makes you think Stonehenge was ANY different?

Then you go on to talk about "imagination" I guess thats what happens when your smoking the good stuff as you seem to be...:rolleyes:

Here is drawing of Stonehenge circa 1640 - 1709

http://www.angelfire.com/realm/swordandchalice/kaibits/stones/old.jpg

Doesn't look too different, sure a few stones aren't standing, but that doesn't mean they weren't, or even that they've misinterpreted their original assembly.

As has been said there is record of its existence back in the twelfth century, how can it be a fabrication?

You have nothing, yet you stubbornly and outrageously claim others have no proof when its the exact opposite.

[Dogman]

You two need to get together and quaff some good brew and share several joints together !

It may help solve your inter family differences !

;)

Both of you by my perspective are both upside down !

HOOT !

[Glass]

You two need to get together and quaff some good brew and share several joints

It may help solve your inter family differences !

;)

I can't read what he(?) says unless someone else quotes. As for the other things. If I did something like that, I could assure you there'd be no passing to the left hand side.

[Dogman]

I can't read what he(?) says unless someone else quotes. As for the other things. If I did something like that, I could assure you there'd be no passing to the left hand side.


Family squabbles, it is the human way......No?

Anyway out of this one.

But I had to try...

[aeondaze]

I can't read what he(?) says unless someone else quotes.

haha, what a douche! ;D

[Horn]

You have nothing,

Here ya go, Glass.

[Glass]

Very interesting. Isn't it? A story to cover up for another story perhaps?


Stonehenge may have been first erected in Wales, 'amazing' finds suggest
Evidence of quarrying for Stonehenge’s bluestones is among the dramatic discoveries leading archeologists to theorise that England’s greatest prehistoric monument may have first been erected in Wales (http://www.theguardian.com/uk/wales).

It has long been known that the bluestones that form Stonehenge’s inner horseshoe came from the Preseli hills in Pembrokeshire, around 140 miles from Salisbury Plain.
Now archaeologists have discovered a series of recesses in the rocky outcrops of Carn Goedog and Craig Rhos-y-felin, to the north of those hills, that match Stonehenge’s bluestones in size and shape. They have also found similar stones that the prehistoric builders extracted but left behind, and “a loading bay” from where the huge stones could be dragged away.


Carbonised hazelnut shells and charcoal from the quarry workers’ campfires have been radiocarbon-dated to reveal when the stones would have been extracted.
Prof Mike Parker Pearson, director of the project and professor of British later prehistory at University College London (UCL), said the finds were “amazing”.

“We have dates of around 3400 BC for Craig Rhos-y-felin and 3200 BC for Carn Goedog, which is intriguing because the bluestones didn’t get put up at Stonehenge until around 2900 BC,” he said. “It could have taken those Neolithic stone-draggers nearly 500 years to get them to Stonehenge (http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/stonehenge), but that’s pretty improbable in my view. It’s more likely that the stones were first used in a local monument, somewhere near the quarries, that was then dismantled and dragged off to Wiltshire.”

The dating evidence suggests that Stonehenge could be older than previously thought, Parker Pearson said. “But we think it’s more likely that they were building their own monument [in Wales], that somewhere near the quarries there is the first Stonehenge and that what we’re seeing at Stonehenge is a second-hand monument.”
There is also the possibility that the stones were taken to Salisbury Plain around 3200 BC and that the giant sarsens – silicified sandstone found within 20 miles of the site – were added much later. “Normally we don’t get to make that many fantastic discoveries in our lives,” Parker Pearson said. “But this is one.”

The guardian.co.uk
(http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/dec/07/stonehenge-first-erected-in-wales-secondhand-monument)

[ximmy]

Same angle as the great pyramid if Giza.

Faced directly west in a line.

A Strange and profound ritual site for those who travel the Mother road?



http://www.pseudoprime.com/Images/HPIM0827-1.jpg

http://www.genetologisch-onderzoek.nl/wp-content/image_upload/RT80401CadillacRanch2web_01.jpg

[mick silver]

ximmy how many million of years have those been there

[JohnQPublic]

https://youtu.be/V0-6r-6BsRk

[Jewboo]

Another thread that mysteriously pops up every now and then EVEN after being debunked on many occasions, makes one wonder sometimes about the people that consistently post this baloney time and time again. :rolleyes:

http://krackersworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/The-Druids-of-Stonehedge.png

Stonehedge is a holograph and those people are Crisis Actors.





:(?? Goldissima didn't tell you?