One Climate Prediction That Came True

[Horn]

July was Earth’s hottest month ever recorded (http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2015/08/20/july-record-warm/32045131/)

One Climate Prediction That Came True (https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/08/21/one-climate-prediction-that-came-true/)Posted on August 21, 2015 (https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/08/21/one-climate-prediction-that-came-true/)by stevengoddard (https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/author/stevengoddard/)
Two years ago, I realized that the criminals at NOAA and NASA were no longer making any attempt to generate honest temperatures, and I predicted that they were ramping up to engage in whatever fraud was necessary to declare every month to be the hottest ever. My prediction was correct, with criminals running the White House, NOAA and NASA.

July was the hottest month worldwide since records began being kept in 1880, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced Thursday.
The temperature in July, when averaged for all locations around the planet, was 61.86 degrees, topping the previous hottest months of July 1998 and July 2010.
Germany and the United Kingdom both broke all-time July heat records.
July was Earth’s hottest month ever recorded (http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2015/08/20/july-record-warm/32045131/)
The level of fraud on display here is off scale. The UK had a cold July, and globally – July of 1998 was much hotter.

https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ch_tlt_2015_07_anom_v03_3-1.png
https://i2.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ch_tlt_1998_07_anom_v03_3.png (http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ch_tlt_1998_07_anom_v03_3.png)
July was nowhere near the hottest month.
https://i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/July1936vs2015.gif

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/08/21/one-climate-prediction-that-came-true/

[Horn]

Pretty funny video at the top link...well if you think .gov read script is funny.

[Jewboo]

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/al-gore-prophet-of-doom.jpg


:rolleyes:

[Horn]

The flash freezes that I mentioned above, while relatively rare on the Atlantic side of the Pole (as far as I could see) were astonishingly common this past summer on the Pacific side, even to the point where you could call them the rule rather than the exception. Even in July, when the slush season is suppose to be at its height, temperatures were often below freezing.

Obviously this would fascinate me, especially as smarter people had told me flash freezes could not happen. I happen to believe in what I can see, more than I believe in smarter people, because smarter people are not God. God is Truth, which is something better scientists respect, better poets respect, better engineers respect, and even better Atheists respect (because better Atheists believe in Truth even if they don’t believe in God.)

American coins state, “In God We Trust,” because initially America was founded on Truth. This Truth respected the sanctity of the eyesight of even a bumpkin farmer like myself, for I was given the same one vote of the richest man, and the same one vote as the smartest genius.
Unfortunately America has fallen. It is governed by people who do not trust Truth, because Truth can make us look incorrect. When they say they will reduce unemployment, and unemployment rises, rather than trusting the Truth, they simply change the way the data is gathered, so it looks like unemployment isn’t rising.
In the same manner, when they say the Globe is warming, and it isn’t, they just change the way the data is gathered, so it looks like the world is warming. This falsification of temperature data has been done so blatantly and so crudely that I think the rest of the world is starting to catch on. The United States is not what it used to be. Rather than the rescuers of other nations, we might be in need of rescue.
In the end, the nation that saves the world will be the one that is most honest and most truthful, not the one that is most sly and deceitful. In terms of a free press, I’m ashamed to say the American Press is the latter and not the former. Americans only read their papers to learn what the Bogus News is. For the Truth they turn to the internet.

As an American, brought up to love the Truth, I am utterly appalled by my government’s dishonesty. I will do all in my tiny power to remove big-shots from office. However the United States may have past its prime, and it may be up to another nation to take the baton as we fall. Once we were “the Last Hope Of Humanity,” but maybe that honor will pass on to India. They certainly have a freer press, a greater population, and may well deserve the honor of being called “The World’s Greatest Democracy”.

As an American, it really aggravates me to watch America lose the status of being the “good guys”. But what can a bumpkin do? All I can do is speak the Truth as loud and as long as I can. All it has ever done is bring me trouble, in terms of political power and wealth, but it makes me free, and that is better than power and wealth. (Even if they lock you up, you are still free, as Paul and Peter proclaimed from Roman jails.)

What does this have to do with sea-ice? Well, a government so fallen that it would falsify unemployment figures, and temperature figures, might also be tempted to falsify sea-ice data, or at least shut down cameras that refuse to verify that water the government states is ice-free holds no ice. Or so stated my paranoia.
However the wonderful thing about the O-buoy cameras is that, even if they are denied access to satellites, they can store their information and just wait. Later, when the satellites become available, all the evidence can be down-loaded.

For a while Truth may be hidden, like the part if an iceberg under water. But it doesn’t cease to exist just because you can’t see it. (And it can sink a Titanic, if you ignore it.)

https://sunriseswansong.wordpress.com/2015/08/20/arctic-sea-ice-one-whale-of-a-slot/

[mick silver]

It was cool here in july with way to much rain . plow shit under this week . hope next year better if not I will not be salling vegs at the market

[mick silver]

The People → In Climate Science, Government Fraud Is Essential To Enable Academic Fraud (https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/in-climate-science-government-fraud-is-essential-to-enable-academic-fraud/)Posted on August 18, 2015 (https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/08/18/in-climate-science-government-fraud-is-essential-to-enable-academic-fraud/) by stevengoddard (https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/author/stevengoddard/)
In 1975

[Horn]

The U.S. government is at it again, hyping meaningless records in a parameter that does not exist in order to frighten us about something that doesn’t matter.
NASA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-aeronautics-and-space-administration/) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration/) (NOAA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration/)) announced this week that according to their calculations, July 2015 was the hottest month since instrumental records began in 1880. NOAA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration/) says that the record was set by eight one-hundredths of a degree Celsius over that set in July 1998. NASA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-aeronautics-and-space-administration/) calculates that July 2015 beat what they assert was the previous warmest month (July 2011) by two one-hundredths of a degree.

But government spokespeople rarely mention the inconvenient fact that these records are being set by less than the uncertainty in the statistics.NOAA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration/) claims an uncertainty of 14 one-hundredths of a degree in its temperature averages, or near twice the amount by which they say the record was set. NASA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-aeronautics-and-space-administration/) says that their data is typically accurate to one tenth of a degree, five times the amount by which their new record was set.


So, the new temperature records are meaningless. Neither agency knows whether a record was set.
Such misrepresentations are now commonplace in NOAA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration/) and NASA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-aeronautics-and-space-administration/)announcements. They are regularly proclaiming monthly and yearly records set by less than the uncertainties in the measurements. Scientists within the agencies know that this is dishonest.

They also know that calculating so-called global average temperatures to hundredths of a degree is irrational. After all, there is very little data for the 70 percent of Earth’s surface that is ocean. There is also little data for mountainous and desert regions, not to mention the Antarctic. Much of the coverage is so sparse that NASA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-aeronautics-and-space-administration/) is forced to make the ridiculous claim that regions are adequately covered if there is a temperature-sensing station within nearly 750 miles. This is the distance between Ottawa, Canada, and Myrtle Beach, S.C. cities with very different climates. Yet, according to NASA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-aeronautics-and-space-administration/), only one temperature sensing station is necessary for the two cities and the vast area between them to be adequately represented in their network.


In the final analysis, it is no more meaningful to calculate an average temperature for a whole planet than it is to calculate the average telephone number in the Washington D.C. phone book. Temperature, like viscosity and density, and of course phone numbers, is not something that can be meaningfully averaged. “Global temperature” does not exist.

In their award winning book, “Taken By Storm” (2007), Canadian researchers Christopher Essex and Ross McKitrick explain: “Temperature is not an amount of something [like height or weight]. It is a number that represents the condition of a physical system. In thermodynamics it is known as an intensive quantity, in contrast to quantities like energy, which have an additive property, which we call extensive in thermodynamics.”
Even if enough accurate surface temperature measurements existed to ensure reasonable planetary coverage (it doesn’t) and to calculate some sort of global temperature statistic, interpreting its significance would be challenging. What averaging rule would you use to handle the data from thousands of temperature-sensing stations? Mean, mode, median, root mean square? Science does not tell us. For some groups of close temperature measures (and NASA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-aeronautics-and-space-administration/) and NOAA (http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/national-oceanic-and-atmospheric-administration/) are dealing with thousands of very close temperatures), one method of calculating an average can lead to a determination of warming while another can lead to a conclusion of cooling.
Even if you could calculate some sort of meaningful global temperature statistic, the figure would be unimportant. No one and nothing would experience it directly since we all live in regions, not the globe. There is no super-sized being straddling the planet, feeling global averages in temperature. Global warming does not matter.

Future generations are bound to ask why America closed its coal-fueled generating stations, its cheapest, most plentiful source of electric power, and wasted billions of dollars trying to stop insignificant changes in imaginary phenomena.
The sad answer will be that it had nothing to do with the realities of science, technology or economics. The tragic blunder is based on satisfying political expedience for a privileged few, egged on by vested financial interests, and supported by largely uninformed activists granted the media platforms needed to sway public opinion. As Jay Lehr, science director of the Chicago-based Heartland Institute said, “It is a scam that dwarfs all others that have come before.”
• Tom Harris is executive director of the Ottawa, Canada-based International Climate Science Coalition.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/23/tom-harris-global-warming-deceptive-temperature-re/

[Horn]

This guy's always a pretty good read.

ARCTIC SEA ICE —Tundra Wonder, Methane Blunder— (https://sunriseswansong.wordpress.com/2015/08/26/arctic-sea-ice-tundra-wonder-methane-blunder/)
https://sunriseswansong.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/ice-flowers-img_1496.jpg?w=620&h=421