Shami-Amourae
25th August 2015, 01:34 AM
THE JESUITS - 10 FACTS
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.” – Yahushua in Matthew 7:15 (NKJV)
“We came in like lambs and will rule like wolves.” - Francesco Borgia, Third Jesuit Superior General.
The Society of Jesus, more commonly referred to as the Jesuits, are the armed militia of the Roman Catholic Church (https://www.worldslastchance.com/end-time-prophecy/the-beast-from-the-sea-roman-catholic-church-in-prophecy.html). They were sanctioned in 1540 by Pope Paul III with one mandate: to defeat Protestantism and regain global Papal rule. To achieve this monumental task, they employ ever-adapting methods of pseudo-education, social programs, infiltration, and all wickedness that could possibly be conceived. Needless to say, they are achieving great success in their mission, which is climaxing with the present pope, Pope Francis, i.e. the Eighth and last Pope of Revelation 17, who held some of the highest positions in Argentina, including Provincial Superior in the Society of Jesus and Archbishop of Buenos Aires. He was made a cardinal by Pope John Paul II.
Today most of the world is oblivious as to how Jesuits operate, from their inception to this very day. Now more than ever, World’s Last Chance believes it is exceedingly important to bring up the following historical facts about this evil society, to expose the wicked nature of this truly malevolent order.
https://1888.org/images/2013/05/23/11232/220px-Clemens_XIV.PNG
Fact #1
Pope Clement XIV abolished the Jesuits as a society in 1773:
It did not take long for the 18th Century Catholic nations to get tired of the meddling of the Jesuits into their national affairs. They were so infuriated against the Jesuits that they demanded the Roman Catholic Church abolish them once and for all. Sufficient political pressure was brought to bear on Pope Clement XIII. However, he passed away before he could do anything about it. The task of abolishing the Society of Jesus then fell on his successor, Clement XIV. As Clement XIV signed the decree abolishing the Jesuit Order he said, “I have signed my death warrant,…” Within nine months he was dead. [Many contemporaries considered his death a case of poisoning, and suspected the Jesuits were responsible].
Source: http://www.pickle-publishing.com/papers/triple-crown-clement-xiv.htm
Fact #2
No other entity on Earth was expelled and suppressed by Catholic and non-Catholic countries as the Jesuits:
https://1888.org/images/2013/05/23/11232/image_provider.jpg
Obviously the Jesuits were not expelled from many nations (even Catholic nations) because of their educational or charity work. They were expelled for engaging in and carrying out subversive political plots against humanity to advance their own cause.
"Between 1555 and 1931 the Society of Jesus was expelled from at least 83 countries, city states and cities, for engaging in political intrigue and subversion plots against the welfare of the State, according to the records of a Jesuit priest of repute . Practically every instance of expulsion was for political intrigue, political infiltration, political subversion, and inciting to political insurrection."
The Jesuits are known for their deception, spying, infiltration, assassination, and revolution. They worked deep into the political field and plotted through politics throughout the world countries.
[I]Source: "The Babington Plot", by J.E.C. Shepherd, p.12
When the Jesuits are expelled from a country, they simply change strategies and return to the country they were expelled from under a new disguise. The following sums up their operational strategy:
“We came in like lambs and will rule like wolves. We shall be expelled like dogs and return like eagles.”
Source: Francesco Borgia, Third Jesuit Superior General.
https://1888.org/images/2013/05/23/11232/hitler-portrait.jpg
Fact #3
Hitler modeled his dreaded SS army and party after the organizational structure of the Jesuits and the Roman Catholic Church:
"…the SS organization had been constituted according to the principles of the Jesuit Order."
Source: "The Secret History of the Jesuits," by Edmond Paris, p. 164
Walter Schellenberg, former chief of Nazi counter-espionage made this statement: "The S.S. organization had been constituted by Himmler [Heinrich Himmler, leading member of the Nazi party] according to the principles of the Jesuit Order. Their regulations and the Spiritual Exercises prescribed by Ignatius of Loyola were the model Himmler tried to copy exactly. Himmler's title as supreme chief of the S.S. was to be the equivalent of the Jesuits' 'General' and the whole structure was a close imitation of the Catholic Church's hierarchical order." "The Secret History of the Jesuits," by Edmond Paris, p. 164
Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did Lenin too, "far as I recall. The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the Catholic Church. There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the Party.
Source: Manfred Barthel, "The Jesuits: History and Legend of the Society of Jesus (New York, 1984), Adolf Hitler, p.266.
"I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits", said Hitler... "Until now, there has never been anything more grandiose, on the earth, than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church. I transferred much of this organization into my own party... I am going to let you in on a secret... I am founding an Order... In my "Burgs" of the Order, we will raise up a youth which will make the world tremble... Hitler then stopped, saying that he couldn't say any more..
https://1888.org/images/2013/05/23/11232/300px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-R24391_Konkordatsunterzeichnung_in_Rom1.jpg
Signing the concordat is Cardinal Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII). By 1933 he was the Vatican Secretary of State. Second from left is Franz von Papen, a sinister Nazi and devout Roman Catholic who was Hitler's ace diplomat and the Vatican's agent in helping to bring Hitler to power. Standing at the far right can be seen the little-known Vatican prelate, Montini, later to become Pope Paul VI.
Source: "Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: "Hitler m'a dit", (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).
"The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum
, only five years before 1933, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book . . . was written by the Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For . . . it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it."
[I]Source: Edmond Paris, The Secret History of the Jesuits, page 138
Franz von Papen, another powerful Nazi, who was instrumental in setting up the concordat between Germany and the Vatican had this to say: "The Third Reich is the first world power which not only acknowledges but also puts into practice the high principles of the papacy."
Source: http://www.chick.com/reading/books/153/153_03.asp
Fact #4https://1888.org/images/2013/05/23/11232/rev-large.jpg
Over the last 400 years the Jesuits have succeeded in establishing the largest worldwide network of schools and universities.
These prominent schools and universities (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jesuit_institutions), have produced many well known alumni (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_alumni_of_Jesuit_educational_institutions) . Thus, the Jesuits have been able to shape and mould the thinking of many famous world leaders, and produce generations of political and religious leaders who were favorable to the Roman Catholic Church, and her doctrinal agenda.
The renowned British preacher, Charles Haddon Spurgeon, once warned about the church ministers who are graduating from these universities that “… they keep back a portion of the gospel … having studied in the devil’s new Jesuitical college.”
Source: Charles H. Spurgeon “A Solemn Warning for All Churches,” Sermon No. 68
Fact #5
Agents of the Jesuits have been responsible for assassinating many heads of State over the centuries:
Heads of states were assassinated by the Jesuits (http://www.toughissues.org/the%20jesuit%20oder.htm), when they attempt to suppress the influence and meddling of the Jesuits in their national affairs. Of heads of states that are known to have been assassinated by Jesuits we mention for example: William of Orange, Kings Henry III and Henry IV of France, Czars Alexander I and Alexander II of Russia, President Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy, and Mexican President Benito Pablo Juarez.
[CENTER]https://1888.org/images/2013/05/23/11232/Abraham-Lincoln-Shooting.jpg
Abraham Lincoln was fully aware of the evil nature of the Jesuits. He stated, “... it is not against the Americans of the South, alone, I am fighting. It is more against the Pope of Rome, his perfidious Jesuits and their blind and blood-thirsty slaves that we have to defend ourselves.”
Source: Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, by Charles Chiniquy. p. 496
“It would seem that the Jesuits had had it in mind, from the beginning of the war [the American Civil War of 1861-1865], to find an occasion for the taking off of Mr. [Abraham] Lincoln.”
Source: Thomas M. Harris (U.S. Army Brigadier General; Author of the book Rome’s Responsibility for the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln)
“The favorite policy of the Jesuits that of assassination.”[I]
Source: U.S. Army Brigadier General Thomas M. Harris; “Rome’s Responsibility for the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln”; 1897; Page 19)
“It is of faith that [I]the Pope has the right of deposing heretical and rebel kings. Monarchs so deposed by the Pope are converted into notorious tyrants, and may be killed by the first who can reach them.
“If the public cause cannot meet with its defense in the death of a tyrant, it is lawful for the first who arrives, to assassinate him.”
[Defensio Didei, Jesuit Suarez, Book VI. C 4, Nos. 13, 14]
[Donald] Freed remembers what apparently passes for polite conversation when men such as [William] Colby and [Ray] Cline get together. “It was quite bizarre” Freed said, “for the subject they chose was, ‘When is it acceptable to assassinate a head of state?’ Colby presented what he said was a theological and philosophically sound approach. “The Catholic Church,” he said, “had long since wrestled with this question and had,” to Colby’s mind, emerged with a sound concept: “It is acceptable,” he said, “to assassinate a tyrant." [Donald Freed is a friend of the author, Mark Lane. He organized a conference at USC for the U.S. intelligence community and its critics to meet. In the panel were Lane, Ellsberg and John Gerassi, all critics. On the other side were William Colby, former DCI (Director of Central Intelligence (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_Central_Intelligence) from September 1973 to January 1976), David Atlee Phillips, and Ray Cline, former deputy DCI’s.]
[Plausible Denial, Mark Lane, 1991, p. 85]
https://1888.org/images/2013/05/23/11232/jfk-last-moments.jpgPresident John F. Kennedy was another victim of appalling Jesuit wickedness. Once he outwardly distanced himself from the Papal agenda and stood for more liberal ideals and human rights, he was considered, by their standards, a traitor to the Vatican and a “tyrant” worthy of death.
This is an excerpt from “Vatican Assassins” by Eric Jon Phelps:
Knowing that President Kennedy was not going to escalate the Vietnam War, the Intelligence Community began to prepare for his assassination. . . . Cardinal Spellman [Francis Spellman, Archbishop of New York from 1939-1967], through FDR, had arranged the release of “Lucky” Luciano . . . Now the Cardinal needed a favor. If refused, Spellman could use the entire intelligence community which he had helped to organize, to eliminate any mob boss. If agreed to, new gambling centers would open up, Atlantic City in particular. Clearly, if the President [JFK] was removed, everybody would acquire more power and wealth, the intelligence community would become more absolute, and the Cardinal would be even more respected by his peers in Rome.
Later, in 1964, for the first time in history, the Pope of Rome set foot in Fourteenth Amendment America. Cardinal Spellman had performed well and was rewarded by a visit from his Master, fellow Cold Warrior and Vatican Ratline handler, Cardinal Montini, who was now Pope Paul VI. There is yet another reason for the removal of President Kennedy. He wanted to arm Israel. Loftus writes:
“In September 1962 Kennedy decided to supply Israel with defensive ground-to-air missiles capable of stopping aircraft, but not the Egyptian offensive missiles. It was the first arms sale by the U.S. Government to Israel.... Kennedy promised the Israelis that as soon as the 1964 election was over, he would break the CIA ‘into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds’.... With Kennedy’s assassination in November 1963, the Israelis lost the best friend they had in the White House since Truman departed.” Source: The Secret War Against The Jews, John Loftus, 1994]
And why did the Vatican’s Jesuits not want any arms sales to Israel at this time? Why did the Jesuit-controlled President Johnson turn his back as the Egyptian army moved up through the Sinai desert to prepare its assault on Israel in 1967? Because the attack upon Israel had to be provoked. That attack was provoked by the Jesuits’ International Intelligence Community through Egypt falsely perceiving the weakness of the Israeli army and the supposed abandonment of Israel by the American Empire. The six-day war, engineered by Knight of Malta James Angleton, had one primary purpose: the taking of Jerusalem along with the Temple Mount. The apparent lack of military hardware on the part of Israel provoked the planned attack by Egypt. Therefore, Israel launched a preemptive strike and, in six days, the holy city was in the hands of Rome’s Zionist government.
Had Kennedy armed Israel, the Egyptians would never have been emboldened to maneuver for war. With no provoked war, there would have been no Israeli attack. With no Israeli attack, Jerusalem would never have been taken by the Zionists, controlled by the Jesuits’ Mossad. With Jerusalem in Arab hands, the Zionists could never rebuild Solomon’s Temple—unbeknown to them—for the Jesuits’ “infallible” Pope, “Who opposeth and exalted himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so he is God sitteth in the temple of God [Solomon’s rebuilt temple], showing himself that he is God.”
-
It is safe to say that the [I]Jesuit General, using the Pope with his most powerful Cardinal, [assassinated President Kennedy].
Source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican03.htm#THE JESUITS — 1945-1990 (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican03.htm#THE%20JESUITS%20%E2%80%94%201945-1990)
https://1888.org/images/2013/05/23/11232/pieta1.jpg
Shami-Amourae
25th August 2015, 01:41 AM
Question: What is wrong with this picture??
http://www.reformation.org/white-house-pentagon.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/en-white-house-pentagon.jpg)
The giant Pentagon standing army headquarters in Washington City!!
Answer: The United States was founded because of objections to the presence of a British standing army in Boston!!
A standing army may be OK in a monarchy or dictatorship, but the last place it belongs is in a freedom-loving REPUBLIC like the United States.
In the U.S. schools, the children are taught that the colonists separated from Great Britain because of objections to taxation without representation. That is only half the truth, and half the truth is worse that an outright lie....It was the reason for the taxes that was most objectionable to the colonists . . . namely to support a STANDING ARMY in peacetime.
This is exactly what is happening in the U.S. today with a Pentagon budget of over 500 BILLION DOLLARS paid for by the taxpayers!!
The 7 Years' War (http://www.reformation.org/jesuits-in-france.html) or French and Indian War ended in 1763.... In 1768, 2 regiments of British soldiers under general Gage landed in Boston harbor, and this was the real commencement of the War of Independence:
Within a few days after their separation, the troops arrived from Halifax. This was indeed a painful sera. The American war may be dated from the hostile parade of this day; a day which marks with infamy the councils of Britain. At this period, the inhabitants of the colonies almost universally breathed an unshaken loyalty to the king of England, and the strongest attachment to a country whence they derived their origin. Thus was the astonishment of the whole province excited, when to the grief and consternation of the town of Boston several regiments were landed, and marched sword in hand through the principal streets of their city, then in profound peace. (Warren, History of the Rise, Progress and Termination of the American Revolution, p.38). At the end of the 7 Years' War, Great Britain was the most powerful nation in the world. This excited the enmity of Spain and France, and plans were prepared to separate the New World colonies from the mother country.
http://www.reformation.org/mercy-otis-warren2.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/e-mercy-otis-warren.jpg)
Mercy Otis Warren (1728-1814), was a War of Independence historian.
To maintain a standing army in peacetime, and then expect the colonists to PAY for it, was more than any freedom-loving people could bear.
It was a sure recipe to drive the colonists to separate from the mother country.
http://www.reformation.org/general-thomas-gage2.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/e-general-gage.jpg)
General Thomas Gage (1719-1789), commanded the British standing army in Boston.
It is easy for armchair historians to write about historical events hundreds of years after they happen, but Mercy Otis Warren was THERE in Boston during these momentous times, and was personally acquainted with all the leaders of the Revolution.
http://www.reformation.org/the-boston-massacre.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/e-boston-massacre2.jpg)
The Boston massacre occurred in 1770 when a British standing army fired on colonists.
Because of the stationing of a standing army in Boston, Great Britain ignited a conflict which cost her the best land in the world.
http://www.reformation.org/boston-tea-party.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/en-boston-tea-party.jpg)
The Boston Tea Party of 1773 was a protest against British policy in her New World colonies.
Here is a quote from her eye-opening book:
A standing army thus placed in their capital, their commerce fettered, their characters traduced, their representative body prevented meeting, the united petitions of all ranks that they might be convened at this critical conjuncture rejected by the governor; and still threatened with a further augmentation of troops to enforce measures in every view repugnant to the principles of the British constitution; little hope remained of a peaceful accommodation.
The most rational arguments had been urged by the legislative assemblies, by corporate bodies, associations, and individual characters of eminence, to shake the arbitrary system that augured evils to both countries. But their addresses were disdainfully rejected; the king and the court of Great Britain appeared equally deaf to the cry of millions, who only asked a restoration of their rights. At the same time every worthless incendiary, who, taking advantage of these miserable times, crossed the Atlantic with a tale of accusation against his country, was listened to with attention, and rewarded with some token of royal favor. (Warren, History of the Rise, Progress and Termination of the American Revolution. p. 39).
Here is another quote from her eye-opening book:
The experience of all ages, and the observations both of the historian and the philosopher agree, that a standing army is the most ready engine in the hand of despotism, to debase the powers of the human mind, and eradicate the manly spirit of freedom. The people have certainly every thing to fear from a government, when the springs of its authority are fortified only by a standing military force. Wherever an army is established, it introduces a revolution in manners, corrupts the morals, propagates every species of vice, and degrades the human character. Threatened with the immediate introduction of this dread calamity, deprived by the dissolution of their legislature of all power to make any legal opposition; neglected by their sovereign, and insulted by the governor he had set over them, much the largest part of the community was convinced, that they had no resource but in the strength of their virtues, the energy of their resolutions, and the justice of their cause. (Warren, History of the Rise, Progress and Termination of the American Revolution.p. 36).
Here is a quote by a GREAT Briton, written in the year 1697, about the menace of STANDING ARMIES to the liberties of the people:
This subject is so self-evident, that I am almost ashamed to prove it: for if we look through the world, we shall find in no country, liberty and an army stand together; so that to know whether a people are free or slaves, it is necessary only to ask, whether there is an army kept amongst them? (John Trenchard (http://www.reformation.org/john-trenchard.html)).
And another quote about the menace of standing armies within the seat of government:
...and I hope I shall make it appear, that no nation ever preserved its liberty, that maintained an army otherwise constituted within the seat of their government: and let us flatter ourselves as much as we please, what happened yesterday, will come to pass again; and the same causes will produce like effects in all ages. (John Trenchard (http://www.reformation.org/john-trenchard.html)).
http://www.reformation.org/admiral-mullen2.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/en-admiral-mullen.jpg)
Admiral Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, is the head man at the Pentagon under the Jesuit general.
The Pentagon is located in Arlington, VIRGINIA. Queen Elizabeth I or VIRGINIA refused to maintain a standing army even though she was surrounded by powerful enemies.
She trusted in God to protect her, and the world witnessed a stupendous MIRACLE with the destruction of the "Invincible" Armada (http://www.reformation.org/spanish-armada.html) in 1588!!
http://www.reformation.org/adolfo-nicolas3.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/e-adolfo-nicolas3.jpg)
Jesuit general Adolfo Nicolás (http://www.reformation.org/general-adolfo-nicolas.html) runs the Vatican and the Pentagon behind the scenes.
Since the beginning of Vatican Council II or the ECUMENICAL MOVEMENT in 1962, the Jesuits have controlled the Pentagon from behind the scenes. They are waging war with weapons of MASS DESTRUCTION against the enemies of their general . . . as well as former friends and allies of the United States....This is an old Jesuit trick of using an enemy to destroy and enemy!!
This situation is all déjà vu because today's events all happened before when the Jesuits were able to create a standing army in Great Britain and use that army . . . and navy . . . to wage war on their closest ally and friend—heroic Holland!! (http://www.reformation.org/heroic-holland.html)
The ecumenical movement in Great Britain
In 1603, the gracious Queen Elizabeth I died unexpectedly of the effects of poisoning....Her reign was like walking on a tightrope or through a minefield because she was determined to return England . . . and Ireland (http://www.reformation.org/saint-patrick.html) . . . to CATHOLIC and APOSTOLIC Christianity.
Elizabeth was resolved to stop the impoverishment of the kingdoms of England and Ireland by preventing the sending of huge sums of money to Rome for "Peter's Pence, First Fruits, Pardons, Appeals, Dispensations, Palls and other such like."
Here is an excerpt of a letter from Elizabeth to the Roman bishops who DEMANDED that she recognize their religion:
"Neither is there any cause why she should grant them, seeing England embraceth no new or strange Doctrine, but the same which Christ hath commanded, the Primitive and Catholick Church hath received, and the ancient Fathers have with one voice and mind approved." (Camden, History of the Most Renowned and Victorious Princess Elizabeth, p. 36).
As well as restoring the true Gospel to England and Ireland, Elizabeth was determined to follow up on the discoveries of John Cabot (http://www.reformation.org/cabotia.html) by planting a colony in Virginia. At that time, Virginia encompassed ALL of the northern part of the New World.
Her zeal for the Truth, and her desire to colonize the New World, were the main reasons why the "Invincible" Armada was launched against her in 1588.
The peace loving Elizabeth did her utmost to keep her nation at peace and did not maintain a standing army . . . or navy . . . even though she was surrounded by powerful enemies.
Elizabeth was succeeded by James VI of Scotland and Jesuit tactics changed completely with his ascension. Invasion from the outside was abandoned in favor of the Trojan horse ecumenical strategy.
http://www.reformation.org/king-james1.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/e-king-james1.jpg)
King James I (1567-1625).
King of Great Britain from 1603 to 1625.
King James VI of Scotland became King James I (http://www.reformation.org/jesuits-great-britain.html) of England immediately after the death of Queen Elizabeth.
King James signed a peace treaty with England's deadly enemy Spain. During his reign, the Jesuits were slyly building a standing army.
http://www.reformation.org/king-charles1.jpg (http://www.reformation.org/e-king-charles2.jpg)
King Charles I (1600-1649).
King from 1625 to 1649.
Neuro
25th August 2015, 07:26 AM
Jesuits murdered JFK, because he was too nice to Israel? Hahaha
Hahahahah!
Somehow they didn't bother with every other US president after JFK, even though they were even nicer, after JFK was shot in the head!
hahaha. Zzzz
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.