View Full Version : Jewish Republicans going crazy over Trump's popularity
EE_
13th September 2015, 04:27 AM
I think it bothers the Jews greatly that Trump won't take their money. They need to feel like that have control.
Jewish Republicans “Disturbed” By Trump’s Widespread Popularity
September 12, 2015 Realist Report 8 comments
The Jewish Daily Forward published a rather revealing article on September 10, 2015, once again highlighting and exposing the outrageous hypocrisy emanating from the organized Jewish community when it comes to identity politics (amongst other important issues!).
In a nutshell, influential Jewish Republicans are upset with Donald Trump because he is being supported by millions of White people, some of whom are explicitly aware of their racial identity and recognize the fact that there is an agenda (led by the organized Jewish community) to systematically demonize, demoralize, and dispossess White Americans in the very country their ancestors founded.
At a recent board meeting of the Republican Jewish Coalition, the big donors and high-powered operatives in the room went around the table to make sure they had someone supporting each potential Republican nominee.
Jeb Bush backers were easy to find. Supporters of Marco Rubio, too, were plentiful. Ted Cruz had friends there, as did Scott Walker, and even George Pataki and Lindsey Graham. The Republican Jewish elite have spread themselves wide across the GOP firmament.
Yet Donald Trump, who has topped 20% to lead all other Republicans in recent presidential primary polls, and who also leads the pack in both Iowa and New Hampshire, is a different story. An RJC member who was present at the board meeting said he could not recall if Trump had backers there. What is clear is that, despite his surge in the polls, the anti-immigration hard-liner has strikingly little support among prominent Republican Jewish donors, activists and consultants.
Many Republican Jewish leaders remain unwilling to speak about Trump. The RJC’s spokesman did not respond to a request to speak for this story; neither did former Republican National Committee chair Ken Mehlman, who is a member of the RJC’s board; former George W. Bush spokesman Ari Fleischer, also an RJC board member, or former Republican House majority leader Eric Cantor, who has been close to the group.
Jewish Republicans’ critiques of Trump, when they can be convinced to air them, fall into two categories. Most echo the concerns of the Republican establishment, deriding the real estate developer and former reality show star who is advocating selective tax increases on the wealthy as unserious. They worry that he will drive away nontraditional Republican voters. Others, however, have deeper concerns.
“There are a lot of folks who are, to be charitable, into white identity politics, and to be uncharitable are outright racists, who are supporting Trump,” said Nathan Wurtzel, a Republican political consultant and principal at The Catalyst Group, who is Jewish. “It’s very off-putting and disturbing.” […]
Reading what these professional Jewish ethnic activists have to say about Trump, you’d think there was another “Holocaust” coming.
Dr. Kevin MacDonald, editor of The Occidental Observer and author of a number of critically important books describing the Jewish assault on White Western Christian civilization, published a blog post yesterday discussing this exact same article. Dr. MacDonald’s analysis is much more thorough than what I’ve offered here, so please do read it and share it with friends and family.
Suffice it to say, the Jews are once again openly and proudly displaying their outrageous hypocrisy. Here we have members of the Republican Jewish Coalition, an avowedly ethnic network of Jewish Republicans seeking to influence and shape the democratic process and public policy, essentially condemning Trump because “folks who are into… white identity politics” and who may be “outright racists” are supporting Trump.
According to the Jews, it’s perfectly acceptable and morally necessary for Jews to organize politically in order to advance their own unique ethnic interests, which in virtually all cases are diametrically opposed to those of the nation they parasitically reside in. However, Whites doing (or attempting to do) the same thing is “off-putting” and “disturbing” and must be condemned.
http://therealistreport.com/jewish-republicans-disturbed-by-trumps-widespread-popularity/
Ares
13th September 2015, 06:10 AM
Not sure why they are so concerned. Trump is a self admitted Isreal firster. So having a presidential candidate who is all about Isreal first just isn't enough for them, they have to control his strings too.
aeondaze
13th September 2015, 06:31 AM
Here's what I think is happening. Trump is a ruse.
In the same way that Ron Paul was used to sideline all the libertarian minded republicans, Trump is being used to sideline those who see through the jewish multicultural agenda.
Just like how Ron Paul pulled out at the last minute during the republican primaries and left the nomination wide open to Mitt Romney, Trump will politic and agitate right up until the very last hurdle when he'll step aside and leave it ALL for Jeb Bush.
The aim of the game is to demoralise and neutralise that component of the Republican party faithful. They successfully marginalised and obliterated the libertarians within the Republican party, now they seek to do the same again with another perhaps more dangerous demographic; those that refuse to jettison their western cultural pride.
Trump is a ruse, he talks the talk, but will he really walk the walk, or will he just pull up stumps and simply walk away having completely drained the momentum from the anti-multicultural elements within the Republican party?
EE_
13th September 2015, 07:59 AM
Not sure why they are so concerned. Trump is a self admitted Isreal firster. So having a presidential candidate who is all about Isreal first just isn't enough for them, they have to control his strings too.
That's what I think too. It's not enough to sware your loyalty to the Jews. All they care about is money and the the power of money...taking their money is like taking a blood oath.
EE_
13th September 2015, 08:22 AM
Here's what I think is happening. Trump is a ruse.
In the same way that Ron Paul was used to sideline all the libertarian minded republicans, Trump is being used to sideline those who see through the jewish multicultural agenda.
Just like how Ron Paul pulled out at the last minute during the republican primaries and left the nomination wide open to Mitt Romney, Trump will politic and agitate right up until the very last hurdle when he'll step aside and leave it ALL for Jeb Bush.
The aim of the game is to demoralise and neutralise that component of the Republican party faithful. They successfully marginalised and obliterated the libertarians within the Republican party, now they seek to do the same again with another perhaps more dangerous demographic; those that refuse to jettison their western cultural pride.
Trump is a ruse, he talks the talk, but will he really walk the walk, or will he just pull up stumps and simply walk away having completely drained the momentum from the anti-multicultural elements within the Republican party?
Anything is possible in this fake world that's run by fake people. Time will tell.
midnight rambler
13th September 2015, 09:28 AM
Here's what I think is happening. Trump is a ruse.
In the same way that Ron Paul was used to sideline all the libertarian minded republicans, Trump is being used to sideline those who see through the jewish multicultural agenda.
Just like how Ron Paul pulled out at the last minute during the republican primaries and left the nomination wide open to Mitt Romney, Trump will politic and agitate right up until the very last hurdle when he'll step aside and leave it ALL for Jeb Bush.
The aim of the game is to demoralise and neutralise that component of the Republican party faithful. They successfully marginalised and obliterated the libertarians within the Republican party, now they seek to do the same again with another perhaps more dangerous demographic; those that refuse to jettison their western cultural pride.
Trump is a ruse, he talks the talk, but will he really walk the walk, or will he just pull up stumps and simply walk away having completely drained the momentum from the anti-multicultural elements within the Republican party?
Ron Paul was never really serious about pursuit of the office as he was about 'getting the message out'. He knows well that anyone who doesn't fall in line with the agenda will get 'neutralized'. I don't think it's fair to say that Ron Paul was willingly 'used' as you're asserting.
mick silver
14th September 2015, 06:09 PM
Ron Paul on the Evolution of Freedom in the 21st Century With Anthony Wile - June 22, 2014 $(document).ready(function(){ var defaultP = parseInt($('#article_main').css('font-size')); var count = 0; var elements = ['#article_main *', '.article_text *', '.article_text_newsletter *']; $('.plus').click(function(){ if ( count <= 1 ) { $(elements).each(function(key, val) { $(val).css('font-size', parseInt($(val).css('font-size'))+1); }); count++; }; //alert( "Currently at " + count ); }); }); 52 Introduction: A leading free-market voice and political leader of the free-market movement in the United States, former Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex) is also a medical doctor and a leading exponent of Austrian free-market economics. Dr. Paul retired from Congress in January 2013 after an unsuccessful run for Republican presidential nominee in 2012. While Dr. Ron Paul came to politics somewhat later in life, Ron has had an enormous impact on American sociopolitical culture. The impact was initiated on a broad scale during Ron Paul's run for the presidency in 2008 when he competed with other candidates on the Republican ticket and received national airtime for his views. For many Americans, this was the first time they had heard a message that was both anti-war and anti-state, yet delivered by a successful politician who had served his country in wartime and whose focus was on a strict interpretation of the Constitution. In fact, Ron Paul's insistence that Congress follow the Constitution in its legislative initiatives led to Dr. Paul receiving the moniker "Dr. No." Dr. Paul continues to refuse to accept the congressional pension to which he is entitled as a congressman, believing his acceptance of it would be "hypocritical and immoral." After losing the 2008 Republican nomination to John McCain, Congressman Ron Paul founded the advocacy group Campaign for Liberty, developed the Ron Paul Curriculum and the Ron Paul Channel and is very involved with Young Americans for Liberty. Dr. Paul has also written several widely distributed books such as End The Fed and The Revolution: A Manifesto. By virtue of Dr. Paul's education in free-market Austrian economics, his friendship with such luminaries as economist Murray Rothbard of the Ludwig von Mises Institute and his formidable grasp of the history of free markets, Ron Paul was well-positioned to become a leading figure in a conversation over the resurgence of freedom in America. Daily Bell: Thank you for speaking with us, Dr. Paul. We know your time is short today so will keep our questions succinct. Please tell us first about the efforts you have you been most focused on since leaving Congress. Ron Paul: I've done various things. A lot of people ask me if I've retired. I've retired from Congress but I'm probably busier than ever because I have a lot of projects going on. I'm busy with the Internet programming that I have with the Ron Paul Channel. I have a Ron Paul Curriculum, trying to get homeschooling moving along. I stay very involved with Young Americans for Liberty and travel to college campuses. I usually stay rather busy! Daily Bell: Of the never-ending stream of "bad news" these days, what has you most concerned right now? What do you see as the most significant problem that the US faces? Ron Paul: There's one problem I think the world faces, and the United States faces, which is a very generalized problem that I deal with all the time and I think is the source of all our troubles. That is the lack of understanding and determination to protect liberty for the people. If you do that you solve so many problems – economic, you have less war and all these other things. But most of the time when people are interested in the most important issue they're looking for something maybe more specific and right now I think it involves foreign affairs. I think what's going on in Iraq verifies my position and the position of many others that have held for a long time that us being involved there and intervention in these internal affairs and squabbles around the world and being the policeman of the world doesn't lead to many good things. And it's coming back to haunt us right now. It's very expensive, a lot of people have died and after ten years, where are we? We're worse off than ever. It's getting so silly that we're actually talking about working with the Iranians to help us out in bringing about stability. But it's not only stability in Iraq. It's regional. It has to do with oil. There are problems going on with our interventions everywhere from Libya to Egypt to the Middle East to Syria and Ukraine. It's just way too much and it contributes so much to our economic problems because it all costs a lot of money and leads to a lot of death. I think that's the greatest thing we face now. More specifically economically, I think the wave of the future the people will all of a sudden start talking about will be inflation, though I believe inflation is here because they're printing money like crazy. I think prices are going up in certain areas very significantly and it will finally get to the point where even the government statistics will have to admit that there is a lot of inflation in the system. Daily Bell: Is the US, like Rome, doomed to fall or can the pre-Civil War laissez faire republic be brought back? Ron Paul: I work on the assumption that you can save the republic and it can come back but not in a conventional way. Although I'm involved in political activity, in trying to help people get elected and stay involved, I do not believe the republic is going to be saved by electing two or three or ten more members of Congress who are very sincere about doing the right things. I think it's good. I think it's beneficial only in providing answers for the long term. So I see the republic and our liberties being much further undermined – because they are constantly being undermined. If you think of what's happened since 9/11, our liberties have been taken away constantly and I think that's going to get much, much worse and we're going to have a lot more violence, not only around the world but here at home and the economic problems are going to get much worse. And indeed, our liberties and our republic will be threatened and in many ways we don't have the fundamentals at all anymore. But on the positive side, I think there are a lot of people waking up. For once in the history of Keynesianism more and more people, and and the young people I've talked to at the college level, are realizing that there's something seriously wrong with the economic model of Keynesianism, this idea that you can print money and run up debt and it doesn't have any consequence. So we have a tremendous opportunity. The failure of Keynesianism in the 20th century shows that fascism and communism are evil monsters and they don't work and they've finally collapsed. And authoritarianism doesn't work, and telling people how to run their lives. And I think there's a growing movement. The freedom movement is alive and well. Now, how we go from here to having a much better system it's hard to tell but it's not going to be gradual and smooth. I think we're going to have things get much, much worse here, more attacks on our liberties and maybe a total breakdown of our economy, with then an opportunity if we lay the groundwork for having a generation of individuals realize what can replace the system we have. That's exactly what the left did, the Keynesians and the socialists. For years and years they controlled the thought processes and the thought leaders and they were teaching and preaching all this government intervention, the Federal Reserve System, pushing of interest rates and economic planning. I think the wave is different and I believe that if we continue the momentum we can pick up the pieces and have a much better society than we've had in a long time. Daily Bell: How much of that waking up, as you said, can be contributed to the Internet? And do you see it growing worldwide or only in the US? Ron Paul: I think the Internet is key to it and is the one reason why I have my Internet program. Fewer and fewer people depend on regular TV and you see more programs being deleted from TV. So the Internet is the wave of the future and that's one of the reasons the freedom movement is growing, because it's not dependent on the establishment. When I got interested in these ideas in the '50s and '60s it was very, very difficult to get any information but today it's so easy and it spreads like a wildfire. I think it's fantastic and hopefully, that is so, so big that no one government can close it down. I'm betting somebody who knows a lot more about computers than I do will be able to maintain some type of communication on the Internet. It is worldwide. I've said it so many times – this is not a Republican deal. We're not just trying to improve the Republicans and make it a better party. If the ideas are correct they will be pervasive, just like the interventionist foreign policy and Keynesian intervention economics. That was endorsed by the Republicans and Democrats; they just argued over who got to be the managers. And I think this is what's going on and it's worldwide and if we continue to improve on our successes, it will influence not only Republicans and Independents and Democrats; it will be worldwide. I hear from a lot of people around the world and I do travel out of the country, who are encouraged and are anxious to hear the message. Daily Bell: What do you think of drug legalization? Is it a good idea to legalize marijuana? How about other drugs? Ron Paul: I don't look at it in that narrow sense. I look at it in the broad sense of legalizing freedom, the freedom of choice, and that includes everything that you put into your body, everything that you put into your soul, your religious beliefs, everything you put into your mind, your intellectual pursuits. We don't tend to watch and regulate those so why should we regulate anything we put into our bodies? I would just say legalize freedom. Let people make the choices. The biggest hurdle for people to get over is the fact that if you legalize something it doesn't mean you endorse it. Just because I legalize freedom of choice in religion, that doesn't mean I endorse violence by some religions or anything else, or some religions that make no sense. But if they're nonviolent, people get to make their choices. And the same way on personal habits. The key thing about personal habits and individual liberty is if people make bad choices, whether they make bad choices in their social behavior or bad choices in their economic behavior, they have to suffer the consequences and they can never go to the government and to their neighbor and use force to bail them out. They have to assume responsibility for it. So I'm for legalizing all freedom that does not initiate violence against another person. Daily Bell: You stated you see an overarching economic crash coming, so where do you see the Federal Reserve in that overall collapse? Ron Paul: One thing is for sure, the Federal Reserve and those who benefit – everything from the military-industrial complex to all welfarists – they will not take it easily. Although we've made great progress in the last eight years and have actually had the bill in the House passed that would audit the Federal Reserve, the people who benefit from it are very, very determined not to allow that to happen. So I think we have to keep doing it. I keep working with that to make sure everybody knows what it is, because when we repeal it we don't want another Federal Reserve System; we want constitutional money and we want commodity money and we want freedom of choices in it. And that is the important thing. But I don't think we'll legislate the Fed out of existence. Even I don't say it would be wise to take the key and lock the door and close down the Federal Reserve System tomorrow. It would be rather chaotic. But I do believe the system will self-destruct because, although we've benefited tremendously by being able to issue the reserve currency of the world, that is coming to an end. It will come to an end. It's a nonviable system. And we just have to fight bad ideas with good ideas and, as far as I'm concerned, the good ideas come from the Austrian economists and commodity money and freedom of choice. Daily Bell: What do you suggest individuals be doing now toward rebuilding now what we want to exist after the collapse? As opposed to fighting what we've got now, should we be building toward what we want next? Ron Paul: I think the most important thing is education, spreading the message, which is where we're having success, and getting people to understand free-market economics – why it's good and why it's beneficial to the largest number of people and the reason we had a large middle class at one time. And the only responsibility that each of us has is to educate ourselves. We can't just listen to the propaganda of the government or the misplaced education that most of us got from our colleges and public schools. We have to challenge that and that's the great part about the Internet – we can find those answers. After each and every one of us did that then there will always be a role we can play. It will be different. Some of us stay involved in education, others in politics, some people become writers and then others might apply it to their investment opportunities, looking at investments and things and saying this is what's coming; you ought to be prepared. Everybody has a responsibility first to understand the system and then be available and be willing to share that, not only with your friends and neighbors but anybody who asks you for the information. And hopefully, these ideas will spread. Nobody should be discouraged because you don't have to make sure 51 percent of the people understand exactly what's going on; you have to have that 7 or 8 or 9 percent of people who are intellectual leaders who reach other people and explain to the majority why you must go along with liberty versus authoritarianism because we now live in an age of authoritarianism, which has proven to be a failure through the many, many centuries of all the history we've recorded. Daily Bell: What gives you the most hope right now? Ron Paul: I think I get the biggest encouragement from talking to young people figuring this out. Their minds are more open, they're aware of the problems. And, once again, they're not the 51 percent but the ones who will come out and get involved in the many projects I have are very, very enthusiastic about learning and being involved. Some of them get involved in politics and some do other things like teaching. I think that's where I get the greatest encouragement. And, of course, the places where I go I get more support from people who are probably under 30. But then again, there are a few over 30 that know better and remember times that were different, when government was smaller and things were better and people were self-reliant. So I think nobody can measure those numbers of people out there but there are a lot of people who are very sympathetic and we just have to persist. And I think that is what's happening. We're having a lot of determined people, not only because we have the access to the Internet but because of the blatant failures. I noticed a big blip in interest in what I was talking about with the Fed when the housing bubble burst and there'll be another giant movement in our direction when the next crash comes, which I suspect is not too far off. Daily Bell: Thanks for your time! After Thoughts By Daily Bell Staff Ron Paul makes a lot of good points in this terrific interview. But two of the most important have to do with (1) young people's receptiveness to messages about freedom and (2) how the Internet is helping to spread the education that necessarily must accompany free-market thinking. When one looks at what is going on in the Western world, one can be forgiven for being baffled and even disbelieving. The "matrix" that provides justifications for authoritarianism and even spiritual death is so extensive as to be difficult to comprehend. It encompasses militarism, economics, education and socio-political issues. In each case, one finds justifications for the "leadership" of just a few. The cult of the "expert" is all encompassing because if we don't believe in experts, we cannot accept the mind-boggling totality of what we are told to believe. Against this promotional background, people like Ron Paul stand out – speaking "truth to power" – and doing their best to undo the mind control around us. Ron Paul knows it won't take 50 percent of the people to effect a change, or 10 percent. Five, six or seven percent will do. And he is busy using the Internet to reach those people, especially young people who have, as he points out, the open minds that are necessary to process and accept historical truths. Of course, that's one reason Ron Paul is for the legalization of marijuana and other controlled substances. People ought to be responsible for their own actions. The interference of the Nanny State uses such "victimless crimes" to justify far worse incursions into people's natural rights and freedoms. Here at High Alert we support the legalization of marijuana, as well. But we are also aware of the much larger issues that Ron Paul regularly confronts – and which we often write about. Ron Paul is a thought leader for the freedom community, and as such continues to educate a younger generation that will build on his legislative, philosophical and literary achievements. There's not much in this modern world that is more important. - See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/exclusive-interviews/35418/Anthony-Wile-Ron-Paul-on-the-Evolution-of-Freedom-in-the-21st-Century/#sthash.aNzDGxP9.dpuf
cheka.
14th September 2015, 08:13 PM
Ron Paul was never really serious about pursuit of the office as he was about 'getting the message out'. He knows well that anyone who doesn't fall in line with the agenda will get 'neutralized'. I don't think it's fair to say that Ron Paul was willingly 'used' as you're asserting.
doesnt matter anyway. doc woke up a sleeping monster that is the great hope to turn the thing
full disclosure - doc from my district
Horn
14th September 2015, 08:45 PM
He's workin on his Big heart side.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwIL6imI6EU
Ponce
14th September 2015, 10:52 PM
Mick?, you did say a lot with your post 7 and at the same time you said NOTHING........who the hell will read that mess.....yours truly your "friend" Pone LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL
V
aeondaze
14th September 2015, 11:36 PM
Mick?, you did say a lot with your post 7 and at the same time you said NOTHING........who the hell will read that mess.....yours truly your "friend" Pone LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL
V
Introduction: A leading free-market voice and political leader of the free-market movement in the United States, former Congressman Ron Paul (R-Tex) is also a medical doctor and a leading exponent of Austrian free-market economics. Dr. Paul retired from Congress in January 2013 after an unsuccessful run for Republican presidential nominee in 2012.
While Dr. Ron Paul came to politics somewhat later in life, Ron has had an enormous impact on American sociopolitical culture. The impact was initiated on a broad scale during Ron Paul's run for the presidency in 2008 when he competed with other candidates on the Republican ticket and received national airtime for his views.
For many Americans, this was the first time they had heard a message that was both anti-war and anti-state, yet delivered by a successful politician who had served his country in wartime and whose focus was on a strict interpretation of the Constitution. In fact, Ron Paul's insistence that Congress follow the Constitution in its legislative initiatives led to Dr. Paul receiving the moniker "Dr. No." Dr. Paul continues to refuse to accept the congressional pension to which he is entitled as a congressman, believing his acceptance of it would be "hypocritical and immoral."
After losing the 2008 Republican nomination to John McCain, Congressman Ron Paul founded the advocacy group Campaign for Liberty, developed the Ron Paul Curriculum and the Ron Paul Channel and is very involved with Young Americans for Liberty. Dr. Paul has also written several widely distributed books such as End The Fed and The Revolution: A Manifesto.
By virtue of Dr. Paul's education in free-market Austrian economics, his friendship with such luminaries as economist Murray Rothbard of the Ludwig von Mises Institute and his formidable grasp of the history of free markets, Ron Paul was well-positioned to become a leading figure in a conversation over the resurgence of freedom in America.
Daily Bell: Thank you for speaking with us, Dr. Paul. We know your time is short today so will keep our questions succinct. Please tell us first about the efforts you have you been most focused on since leaving Congress.
Ron Paul: I've done various things. A lot of people ask me if I've retired. I've retired from Congress but I'm probably busier than ever because I have a lot of projects going on. I'm busy with the Internet programming that I have with the Ron Paul Channel. I have a Ron Paul Curriculum, trying to get homeschooling moving along. I stay very involved with Young Americans for Liberty and travel to college campuses. I usually stay rather busy!
Daily Bell: Of the never-ending stream of "bad news" these days, what has you most concerned right now? What do you see as the most significant problem that the US faces?
Ron Paul: There's one problem I think the world faces, and the United States faces, which is a very generalized problem that I deal with all the time and I think is the source of all our troubles. That is the lack of understanding and determination to protect liberty for the people. If you do that you solve so many problems – economic, you have less war and all these other things.
But most of the time when people are interested in the most important issue they're looking for something maybe more specific and right now I think it involves foreign affairs. I think what's going on in Iraq verifies my position and the position of many others that have held for a long time that us being involved there and intervention in these internal affairs and squabbles around the world and being the policeman of the world doesn't lead to many good things. And it's coming back to haunt us right now. It's very expensive, a lot of people have died and after ten years, where are we? We're worse off than ever. It's getting so silly that we're actually talking about working with the Iranians to help us out in bringing about stability.
But it's not only stability in Iraq. It's regional. It has to do with oil. There are problems going on with our interventions everywhere from Libya to Egypt to the Middle East to Syria and Ukraine. It's just way too much and it contributes so much to our economic problems because it all costs a lot of money and leads to a lot of death. I think that's the greatest thing we face now. More specifically economically, I think the wave of the future the people will all of a sudden start talking about will be inflation, though I believe inflation is here because they're printing money like crazy. I think prices are going up in certain areas very significantly and it will finally get to the point where even the government statistics will have to admit that there is a lot of inflation in the system.
Daily Bell: Is the US, like Rome, doomed to fall or can the pre-Civil War laissez faire republic be brought back?
Ron Paul: I work on the assumption that you can save the republic and it can come back but not in a conventional way. Although I'm involved in political activity, in trying to help people get elected and stay involved, I do not believe the republic is going to be saved by electing two or three or ten more members of Congress who are very sincere about doing the right things. I think it's good. I think it's beneficial only in providing answers for the long term.
So I see the republic and our liberties being much further undermined – because they are constantly being undermined. If you think of what's happened since 9/11, our liberties have been taken away constantly and I think that's going to get much, much worse and we're going to have a lot more violence, not only around the world but here at home and the economic problems are going to get much worse. And indeed, our liberties and our republic will be threatened and in many ways we don't have the fundamentals at all anymore.
But on the positive side, I think there are a lot of people waking up. For once in the history of Keynesianism more and more people, and and the young people I've talked to at the college level, are realizing that there's something seriously wrong with the economic model of Keynesianism, this idea that you can print money and run up debt and it doesn't have any consequence. So we have a tremendous opportunity. The failure of Keynesianism in the 20th century shows that fascism and communism are evil monsters and they don't work and they've finally collapsed. And authoritarianism doesn't work, and telling people how to run their lives. And I think there's a growing movement. The freedom movement is alive and well.
Now, how we go from here to having a much better system it's hard to tell but it's not going to be gradual and smooth. I think we're going to have things get much, much worse here, more attacks on our liberties and maybe a total breakdown of our economy, with then an opportunity if we lay the groundwork for having a generation of individuals realize what can replace the system we have.
That's exactly what the left did, the Keynesians and the socialists. For years and years they controlled the thought processes and the thought leaders and they were teaching and preaching all this government intervention, the Federal Reserve System, pushing of interest rates and economic planning. I think the wave is different and I believe that if we continue the momentum we can pick up the pieces and have a much better society than we've had in a long time.
Daily Bell: How much of that waking up, as you said, can be contributed to the Internet? And do you see it growing worldwide or only in the US?
Ron Paul: I think the Internet is key to it and is the one reason why I have my Internet program. Fewer and fewer people depend on regular TV and you see more programs being deleted from TV. So the Internet is the wave of the future and that's one of the reasons the freedom movement is growing, because it's not dependent on the establishment. When I got interested in these ideas in the '50s and '60s it was very, very difficult to get any information but today it's so easy and it spreads like a wildfire. I think it's fantastic and hopefully, that is so, so big that no one government can close it down. I'm betting somebody who knows a lot more about computers than I do will be able to maintain some type of communication on the Internet.
It is worldwide. I've said it so many times – this is not a Republican deal. We're not just trying to improve the Republicans and make it a better party. If the ideas are correct they will be pervasive, just like the interventionist foreign policy and Keynesian intervention economics. That was endorsed by the Republicans and Democrats; they just argued over who got to be the managers. And I think this is what's going on and it's worldwide and if we continue to improve on our successes, it will influence not only Republicans and Independents and Democrats; it will be worldwide. I hear from a lot of people around the world and I do travel out of the country, who are encouraged and are anxious to hear the message.
Daily Bell: What do you think of drug legalization? Is it a good idea to legalize marijuana? How about other drugs?
Ron Paul: I don't look at it in that narrow sense. I look at it in the broad sense of legalizing freedom, the freedom of choice, and that includes everything that you put into your body, everything that you put into your soul, your religious beliefs, everything you put into your mind, your intellectual pursuits. We don't tend to watch and regulate those so why should we regulate anything we put into our bodies? I would just say legalize freedom. Let people make the choices.
The biggest hurdle for people to get over is the fact that if you legalize something it doesn't mean you endorse it. Just because I legalize freedom of choice in religion, that doesn't mean I endorse violence by some religions or anything else, or some religions that make no sense. But if they're nonviolent, people get to make their choices. And the same way on personal habits.
The key thing about personal habits and individual liberty is if people make bad choices, whether they make bad choices in their social behavior or bad choices in their economic behavior, they have to suffer the consequences and they can never go to the government and to their neighbor and use force to bail them out. They have to assume responsibility for it.
So I'm for legalizing all freedom that does not initiate violence against another person.
Daily Bell: You stated you see an overarching economic crash coming, so where do you see the Federal Reserve in that overall collapse?
Ron Paul: One thing is for sure, the Federal Reserve and those who benefit – everything from the military-industrial complex to all welfarists – they will not take it easily. Although we've made great progress in the last eight years and have actually had the bill in the House passed that would audit the Federal Reserve, the people who benefit from it are very, very determined not to allow that to happen. So I think we have to keep doing it. I keep working with that to make sure everybody knows what it is, because when we repeal it we don't want another Federal Reserve System; we want constitutional money and we want commodity money and we want freedom of choices in it. And that is the important thing.
But I don't think we'll legislate the Fed out of existence. Even I don't say it would be wise to take the key and lock the door and close down the Federal Reserve System tomorrow. It would be rather chaotic. But I do believe the system will self-destruct because, although we've benefited tremendously by being able to issue the reserve currency of the world, that is coming to an end. It will come to an end. It's a nonviable system. And we just have to fight bad ideas with good ideas and, as far as I'm concerned, the good ideas come from the Austrian economists and commodity money and freedom of choice.
Daily Bell: What do you suggest individuals be doing now toward rebuilding now what we want to exist after the collapse? As opposed to fighting what we've got now, should we be building toward what we want next?
Ron Paul: I think the most important thing is education, spreading the message, which is where we're having success, and getting people to understand free-market economics – why it's good and why it's beneficial to the largest number of people and the reason we had a large middle class at one time. And the only responsibility that each of us has is to educate ourselves. We can't just listen to the propaganda of the government or the misplaced education that most of us got from our colleges and public schools. We have to challenge that and that's the great part about the Internet – we can find those answers.
After each and every one of us did that then there will always be a role we can play. It will be different. Some of us stay involved in education, others in politics, some people become writers and then others might apply it to their investment opportunities, looking at investments and things and saying this is what's coming; you ought to be prepared. Everybody has a responsibility first to understand the system and then be available and be willing to share that, not only with your friends and neighbors but anybody who asks you for the information. And hopefully, these ideas will spread.
Nobody should be discouraged because you don't have to make sure 51 percent of the people understand exactly what's going on; you have to have that 7 or 8 or 9 percent of people who are intellectual leaders who reach other people and explain to the majority why you must go along with liberty versus authoritarianism because we now live in an age of authoritarianism, which has proven to be a failure through the many, many centuries of all the history we've recorded.
Daily Bell: What gives you the most hope right now?
Ron Paul: I think I get the biggest encouragement from talking to young people figuring this out. Their minds are more open, they're aware of the problems. And, once again, they're not the 51 percent but the ones who will come out and get involved in the many projects I have are very, very enthusiastic about learning and being involved. Some of them get involved in politics and some do other things like teaching. I think that's where I get the greatest encouragement.
And, of course, the places where I go I get more support from people who are probably under 30. But then again, there are a few over 30 that know better and remember times that were different, when government was smaller and things were better and people were self-reliant. So I think nobody can measure those numbers of people out there but there are a lot of people who are very sympathetic and we just have to persist. And I think that is what's happening.
We're having a lot of determined people, not only because we have the access to the Internet but because of the blatant failures. I noticed a big blip in interest in what I was talking about with the Fed when the housing bubble burst and there'll be another giant movement in our direction when the next crash comes, which I suspect is not too far off.
Daily Bell: Thanks for your time!
After Thoughts By Daily Bell Staff
Ron Paul makes a lot of good points in this terrific interview. But two of the most important have to do with (1) young people's receptiveness to messages about freedom and (2) how the Internet is helping to spread the education that necessarily must accompany free-market thinking.
When one looks at what is going on in the Western world, one can be forgiven for being baffled and even disbelieving. The "matrix" that provides justifications for authoritarianism and even spiritual death is so extensive as to be difficult to comprehend.
It encompasses militarism, economics, education and socio-political issues. In each case, one finds justifications for the "leadership" of just a few. The cult of the "expert" is all encompassing because if we don't believe in experts, we cannot accept the mind-boggling totality of what we are told to believe.
Against this promotional background, people like Ron Paul stand out – speaking "truth to power" – and doing their best to undo the mind control around us.
Ron Paul knows it won't take 50 percent of the people to effect a change, or 10 percent. Five, six or seven percent will do. And he is busy using the Internet to reach those people, especially young people who have, as he points out, the open minds that are necessary to process and accept historical truths.
Of course, that's one reason Ron Paul is for the legalization of marijuana and other controlled substances. People ought to be responsible for their own actions. The interference of the Nanny State uses such "victimless crimes" to justify far worse incursions into people's natural rights and freedoms.
Here at High Alert we support the legalization of marijuana, as well. But we are also aware of the much larger issues that Ron Paul regularly confronts – and which we often write about.
Ron Paul is a thought leader for the freedom community, and as such continues to educate a younger generation that will build on his legislative, philosophical and literary achievements. There's not much in this modern world that is more important.
Neuro
15th September 2015, 12:50 AM
Ron Paul was never really serious about pursuit of the office as he was about 'getting the message out'. He knows well that anyone who doesn't fall in line with the agenda will get 'neutralized'. I don't think it's fair to say that Ron Paul was willingly 'used' as you're asserting.
He didn't get a message out either. He was totally silent re 9/11...
Twisted Titan
15th September 2015, 02:09 AM
Every piece of property that Drump drones on about that makes him a so called Billionaire is financed to the fricken hilt.
Every Single One Bar None.
Now here is 10,000 shekel question Lads and Ladies.
What do you think the ethnicity is of the counterparties that holds the debt on Drumps businesses?
If Drump ever gets too close to that brass ring.....he will get a call on his direct cell reminding who owns what and when it can be called due.
Drump is bread and circuses nothing more.
They just might call his loans due just because.
Now wouldnt that be funny?
EE_
15th September 2015, 03:33 AM
Whatever you might think about Trump, he's trashing a lot of people that need trashing. Last night, he completely trashed Carl Rove...who likes this idiot. The sooner Rove is gone, the better!
I think what we have with Trump, is the revolution we've all been waiting for. A revolution against the slugs in government, the establishment, the republicans, Fox News and even Wall Street.
Trump is taking a big healthy shit on all of them and he's turned public dissatisfaction into anger. Who know where this might lead?
I know one thing, if not for Trump, most of America would have already tuned out of this election, figuring we will be getting more of the same screwing by the establishment as always.
So if you wish Trump to be gone, it's like saying you want more Clinton's and Bush's...or some other clone of them.
Wall Street's latest panic: Trump could win
With Bush and Clinton taking their lumps, financial executives face populist critics in both parties.
By BEN WHITE 09/14/15, 07:34 PM EDT
NEW YORK — Wall Street is growing increasingly terrified that Donald Trump — once viewed as an amusing summertime distraction — could actually win the Republican nomination for president.
The real estate billionaire, who took another populist shot on Sunday by ripping into lavish executive pay, continues to rise in the polls. Would-be Wall Street saviors like Jeb Bush are languishing in single digits. The belief that Trump's candidacy would quickly fade is now evaporating in a wave of fear.
“I held four lunches for investors in August and at the first one everyone assumed Trump would implode,” said Byron Wien, vice chairman of Blackstone Advisory Partners and a senior figure on Wall Street. “By the fourth one everyone was taking him very seriously. He taps into frustrations that are very real and he is a master manipulator of the media.”
The CEO of one large Wall Street firm, who declined to be identified by name criticizing the GOP front-runner, said the assumption in the financial industry remains that something will eventually knock Trump off and send voters toward a more establishment candidate. But that assumption is no longer held with strong conviction. And a dozen Wall Street executives interviewed for this article could not say what might dent Trump's appeal or when it might happen.
"I don't know anyone who is a Donald Trump supporter. I don’t know anyone who knows anyone who is a Donald Trump supporter. They are like this huge mystery group,” the CEO said. "So it's a combination of shock and bewilderment. No one really knows why this is happening. But my own belief is that the laws of gravity will apply and those who are prepared to run the marathon will benefit when Trump drops out at mile 22. Right now people think Trump is pretty hilarious but the longer it goes on the more frightening it gets."
The latest frightening broadside for the Wall Street class came on Sunday when Trump said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” that executive pay in America is “a complete joke” and promised to raise taxes on “the hedge fund guys.” In a statement sent to POLITICO on Monday from his campaign, Trump relished in the attacks from Wall Street, singling out both Bush and Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton, another favorite on Wall Street.
"Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton will continue to let Wall Street and the 'hedge fund guys' rip off the people by paying no or very little in taxes," Trump said. "They have total and complete control of Hillary, Jeb and others running. My campaign is self- funded. The only people that have control of me are the people of the United States."
The comments on Wall Street were relatively tame in comparison with his fiery rhetoric about deporting 11 million undocumented immigrants within two years and building a giant border wall with Mexico. The billionaire also recently ripped former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina’s looks, saying they would make her unelectable.
But Trump’s skill at tapping into populist discontent with all major U.S. institutions — including Wall Street — has financial executives increasingly dismayed at the GOP front-runner’s staying power and long-term impact on the party even if he doesn’t get the nomination.
“I don’t think Trump is going to win, but I do worry about all the damage being done to Republicans among Hispanics and women by him being such an idiot,” said a senior executive and major GOP fundraiser at a large bank who also declined to be identified by name. “Everyone thinks he is a buffoon and a bombastic loudmouth who won’t be around at the end. But the concern is that he is still at 30 in the polls and he is going to hang around for a while and do a great deal of damage.”
So far there is no organized effort on Wall Street to mount a “stop Trump” campaign.
Mostly such efforts entail funneling even more money to Bush, whose super PAC, Right to Rise, raised more than $100 million through the first six months of the year. To a lesser extent, Wall Street money continues to flow to Rubio, Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, though Walker is largely viewed as increasingly marginalized in the race.
Supporters of Bush say they still believe that the former Florida governor’s numbers will begin to move when the campaign starts deploying some of its huge war chest to run television ads in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and other early primary and caucus states. And while they say Bush needs a strong performance at Wednesday night’s debate, they don’t expect Bush to throw haymakers Trump’s way.
“Yes I’m a little worried about how poorly Jeb is doing,” said a second Wall Street CEO who is backing the former Florida governor but would not speak on the record. “Hopefully it will get better over time. But there is no point trading insults with Trump. There is a saying that you don’t wrestle with pigs because you just get dirty and the pig loves it.”
Part of the reason Wall Street executives won’t go on the record about Trump is that they believe criticizing him will only drive his numbers higher. Americans continue to hold big banks in low regard following the financial crisis. And Trump’s momentum is built on a generalized hostility to the political and corporate establishment.
Trump can rip into executive compensation in part because he built his own empire and brand and his Trump Organization is privately held, so he can’t be accused of using shareholders' money to enrich himself, a cudgel often used to attack high executive pay at public companies. And establishment attacks would likely just make him stronger.
“Most people in the New York business community don’t really like to speak publicly about politicians and especially not Trump, because he will just jump ugly all over them,” said Kathryn Wylde, president and CEO of the New York City Partnership, a group that includes many of the city’s top business leaders. “Trump has never really been part of the New York City business community or particularly engaged with the real estate community. There’s certainly no close set of relations there. He’s really a lone wolf. And a lot of these people thought Jeb Bush was a shoo-in and they are upset now because they have already thrown in with him and he is looking a little wilted.”
Trump is not entirely without Wall Street support.
He has regularly praised Carl Icahn and said he would make the billionaire investor his first Treasury secretary. Icahn tweeted recently that he would accept the post. He did not respond to a request for comment on Trump.
The frustration on Wall Street goes beyond just Trump’s rise and staying power. The industry’s other preferred candidate, Clinton, is also suffering under the populist wave, losing ground to independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a self-described socialist and outspoken Wall Street critic.
The industry began this election cycle confident that a GOP candidate like Bush would win, and offer some reprieve from populist anger. And if that didn’t happen they would at least get Clinton, who has long and deep ties to the industry and is viewed as largely moderate on financial regulation.
Both Bush and Clinton have tacked populist with pledges to increase taxes on some wealthy investors. But they are still both establishment-friendly, with policies on trade, immigration and other issues that line up closely with elite opinion. And Wall Street does not view either candidate as likely to use the office to further stoke populist resentments.
“Neither of them are doing very well right now,” said one Wall Street Democrat of Bush and Clinton. “Both Trump and Sanders have done a pretty great job tapping into this sense of frustration not just with Wall Street but with all of the establishment.”
One person who might benefit from Trump’s rise and Bush’s current stagnation is Kasich, who worked for seven years at Lehman Brothers — though in an Ohio office — and is viewed as something of an establishment-populist hybrid given his folksy demeanor and heartland background.
“Kasich is a true businessman in contrast to Trump. He is the businessman candidate and he’s pretty compelling in part because Jeb has taken such a beating,” said Wylde. “I’ve set up a meet- and -greet with Governor Kasich and I’ve already got a sellout crowd.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/donald-trump-2016-wall-street-reaction-213614#ixzz3lnUhfg6M
Horn
15th September 2015, 12:27 PM
If Trump ever did get elected I doubt he would expose any corruption, I think he'd end up crippled from a stroke when he realized there's nothing he could achieve in working order as president of the U.S. and that he only had the power of a cheering mascot.
If he did choose to battle any single cog in the system it would be one of the weaker ones permitted by those holding him hostage.
Ares
15th September 2015, 01:14 PM
If Trump ever did get elected I doubt he would expose any corruption, I think he'd end up crippled from a stroke when he realized there's nothing he could achieve in working order as president of the U.S. and that he only had the power of a cheering mascot.
If he did choose to battle any single cog in the system it would be one of the weaker ones permitted by those holding him hostage.
Or crippled by Congress from his own party and the Democrats by the people who own both parties.
Heads they win, tails we lose.
Neuro
15th September 2015, 04:57 PM
I tried to google his position on 9/11, couldn't find much...
Cebu_4_2
15th September 2015, 08:42 PM
Let him roll, we will see how they take him out. Money still doesn't mean everything.
EE_
15th September 2015, 09:42 PM
How many gsus Veterans hate Trump?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NkkfrxbduJ4
midnight rambler
15th September 2015, 09:58 PM
And the inner party and the outer party continue to swap places, until they whipsaw everyone into complete submission.
midnight rambler
15th September 2015, 10:01 PM
Any questions?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhnUgAaea4M
Neuro
16th September 2015, 03:23 AM
Let him roll, we will see how they take him out. Money still doesn't mean everything.
A 5th bankruptcy is my bet, or maybe they let him stay on to be the helmsman of the bankruptcy of USA. Either way America will be ready to accept jewish communism with both arms...
mick silver
16th September 2015, 07:15 PM
he done bankruptcy before and I bet he good at that
Neuro
17th September 2015, 01:33 AM
he done bankruptcy before and I bet he good at that
With a little help from his friends...
mick silver
20th September 2015, 08:09 AM
with all the bankruptcy he done he would be the man to help the USA to do it maybe trump the man to lead usa into an out of a bankruptcy
Neuro
22nd September 2015, 10:31 AM
with all the bankruptcy he done he would be the man to help the USA to do it maybe trump the man to lead usa into an out of a bankruptcy
The bankruptcy of USA is forever. Look at USSR for inspiration. It's about time anyway I think!
Horn
22nd September 2015, 10:43 AM
The bankruptcy of USA is forever. Look at USSR for inspiration. It's about time anyway I think!
If the FED goes so do all other domino fiat currencies. Trump promises to bring all the dollars home.
Shuffles down income tax for tariff of 35%,
with numerous free trade agreements ink still drying there may or may not be blowback... or just a bunch of blowing...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8y2T6eH3dw
“I say in terms of global warming the biggest threat we have isnuclear global warming,” Trump continued, referring to the Iran deal.
mick silver
22nd September 2015, 12:20 PM
and then plunders our wallets to fill its own. If we don't like it, we can just vote for somebody else... who will do the same again
Ares
22nd September 2015, 12:22 PM
and then plunders our wallets to fill its own. If we don't like it, we can just vote for somebody else... who will do the same again
Isn't government great?
PatColo
12th December 2015, 09:35 PM
published Dec 3,
5 Cringeworthy Things Donald Trump Has Said About the Jews – Forward (http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/326020/5-cringeworthy-things-donald-trump-has-said-about-the-jews/)
hoarder
12th December 2015, 10:02 PM
Just like Stalins alleged "purge" of Jews, the Marranos will stage anything to distance themselves from their tribe.
mick silver
12th December 2015, 10:15 PM
http://www.blackrobereg.org/uploads/2/8/9/8/2898266/1198704_orig.jpg
ShortJohnSilver
13th December 2015, 12:49 AM
Here is my take on it:
Scenario 1 - Trump is serious about winning - every time they throw something at him, all they do is amplify his message. It drives them nuts because the regular power levers don't work any more. In desperation, they throw everything they can at him - people get redpilled about the Jewish media - Jewish media starts to lose. Trump says "let's do proper antitrust against the 6 corporations that own the media in this country". What can the media do? If they say nothing - Trump wins by default. If they attack - they have to repeat the original fact and cement it in people's minds.
Even given Trump being serious and pissing off all the right people, I still don't see him winning. But under Scenario 1, a lot of people get redpilled.
Scenario 2 - Trump is a shill put in place to help split the vote so that Hillary gets in - but he is doing too good a job of tapping into anger. Whites are starting to wake up. In trying to shave the tiger, he might have accidentally pissed it off enough that it is now angry.
The media people that fancy themselves elites, have absolutely ZERO CLUE as the actual level of anger , especially among Whites, in this country. That might be their undoing.
PatColo
13th December 2015, 01:33 AM
Scenario 2 - Trump is a shill put in place to help split the vote so that Hillary gets in -
meh, not a real PTB concern... FAKE "ELECTIONS" - Why Ron Paul THE DONALD Can't "Win" (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?53978-FAKE-quot-ELECTIONS-quot-Why-Ron-Paul-Can-t-quot-Win-quot&highlight=fake+paul+can%27t[/url)
I say, just "USE THE DONALD" as a conversation starter to raise awareness... similar to how I suggested using RP the past 2 prez "elections."
DT is getting much more joozmedia attention than RP, coz of DT's personality which ppl like and want to see. Joozmedia has a dilemma! :D
cheka.
13th December 2015, 09:10 AM
this week -- trump again calling for no cuts to social security
the rest of the repugs calling for nyc/dc to decide who gets it, who doesn't. nyc/dc stole the money, now don't want to pay it back
funny that the nyc media doesn't think this is newsworthy
midnight rambler
13th December 2015, 11:29 AM
The Donald hints that IsraHell is funding IS -
http://www.dailystormer.com/yes-donald-trump-call-out-israel-for-funding-isis/
EE_
13th December 2015, 12:05 PM
The Donald hints that IsraHell is funding IS -
http://www.dailystormer.com/yes-donald-trump-call-out-israel-for-funding-isis/
If Trump has turned on the Jews, I would have to say his campaign is over. And he just might have?
I'm seeing more and more Jews speaking angrily against him on various news outlets.
Cebu_4_2
13th December 2015, 12:10 PM
If Trump has turned on the Jews, I would have to say his campaign is over. And he just might have?
I'm seeing more and more Jews speaking angrily against him on various news outlets.
That's where the Jewish infighting is playing out.
mick silver
13th December 2015, 02:42 PM
I think people getting tired of there pay checks being given too the state of IsraHell and folks around here know that IsraHell can never make peace with the one's living around IsraHell
vacuum
13th December 2015, 09:52 PM
The Donald hints that IsraHell is funding IS -
http://www.dailystormer.com/yes-donald-trump-call-out-israel-for-funding-isis/
Geez. He just took on five or six reporters, each of whom had carefully planned trap questions. And he didn't even have the benefit of a camera. I got worn out just listening to it. That must be exhausting.
cheka.
14th December 2015, 06:12 AM
jewish media in perfect lockstep this morning - cbs, fox, abc, cbs, cnn all running the exact same anti-trump pro cruz story at the exact same time
all nyc news channels come out of a central control room
midnight rambler
14th December 2015, 06:43 AM
It's amazing how they're all perfectly timed in lock-step with each other. There's no other explanation than one central nooz distribution center.
PatColo
14th December 2015, 06:53 AM
do my eyes/ears deceive me here? I could swear the cnn bimbo is banging on joo terrorism!! :o
CNN Host Confronts Trump Shill on Zionist Terrorism (http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2015/12/cnn-host-confronts-trump-shill-on.html)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbdgiaYttAE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbdgiaYttAE
EE_
14th December 2015, 07:51 AM
She named a lot of Jewish terrorist attacks we've not been told about before. I wonder if she'll be out of work soon?
EE_
14th December 2015, 08:01 AM
jewish media in perfect lockstep this morning - cbs, fox, abc, cbs, cnn all running the exact same anti-trump pro cruz story at the exact same time
all nyc news channels come out of a central control room
I know, and Rafael Cruz is an "outsider" too...if you believe that.
Does this sound like an outsider to you?
Rafael sounds like the real plant by the "establishment" they want to be the next Commander in Chief Puppet
Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz (born December 22, 1970) is an American politician and the junior U.S. Senator from Texas. He is a candidate for President of the United States in the 2016 presidential election.
Cruz attended elementary and high school in and around Houston, graduated from Princeton University in 1992, and then from Harvard Law School in 1995. Between 1999 and 2003, Cruz was the director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, an associate deputy attorney general at the United States Department of Justice, and domestic policy advisor to President George W. Bush on the 2000 George W. Bush presidential campaign. He served as Solicitor General of Texas from 2003 to 2008, after being appointed by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott. He was the first Hispanic, and the longest-serving solicitor general in Texas history. Cruz was also an adjunct professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law in Austin, from 2004 to 2009. While there, he taught U.S. Supreme Court litigation.
hoarder
14th December 2015, 08:20 AM
do my eyes/ears deceive me here? I could swear the cnn bimbo is banging on joo terrorism!! She didn't really say much. They do this to make it appear that all topics are addressed. "An Israeli tried to bomb a Mosque" how informative is that?
Horn
14th December 2015, 08:24 AM
He shoulda stated that a jew would declare himself as Christian when asked at the border, they're smarter.
Cebu_4_2
14th December 2015, 11:48 AM
jewish media in perfect lockstep this morning - cbs, fox, abc, cbs, cnn all running the exact same anti-trump pro cruz story at the exact same time
all nyc news channels come out of a central control room
Any clips of this yet?
mick silver
14th December 2015, 11:52 AM
CNN's Ashleigh Banfield Compares ISIS to Jews 11:30AM EST 12/14/2015 Ron Cantor (http://www.charismanews.com/component/search/?searchword=Ron%20Cantor&ordering=newest&searchphrase=exact&areas[0]=authors)
there a video I could not copy http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/53814-cnn-s-ashleigh-banfield-compares-isis-to-jews
CNN host Ashleigh Banfield shockingly compares the "Jewish Terror" problem to Radical Islam, as if we are talking apples and apples—as if there is any such thing as Jewish terror in the U.S.
"I'm telling you that there have been that many terrorist attacks by Jews and no one's suggesting that all Jews should be wiped out of this country for visiting. It's the same thing."
No Ashleigh, it's not the same thing at all!
First, there is no Jewish Terror problem in the U.S. She refers to the group, the Jewish Defense League (JDL) and then compares this tiny fringe group that hasn't done anything in 15 years to the present threat of Radical Islam in the U.S. But let's compare.
The JDL has no support in normative Jewish circles. Yet, ISIS and Al Qaeda enjoy support from hundreds of millions of Muslims, ranging from vocal encouragement on social media for standing against the west to actually joining them in the fight.
There are no synagogues in the U.S. aiding and abetting what's still left of the JDL to carry out acts of terror against Americans. There are hundreds of mosques in the U.S. that are sympathetic to Radical Islam's goals. And we can be sure that some are actively involved in the fight.
With the JDL, there is no threat. With Radical Islam the threat is very real and present. Wake up Ashleigh!
Secondly, if she is referring to minuscule acts of terror from a tiny fringe segment of Israelis, she is still way off.
A) When an Israeli commits a rare act of terror against an Arab, the entire Israeli/Jewish population mourns the victim and condemns the act. When Muslims commit acts of violence against Jews, they name streets after them in Ramallah and mothers hand out candy in the streets.
advertisement
B) Far less than 1% of Israelis embrace such acts. However 7-15% of Muslims are radicals or 100,000,000 to 200,000,000!!! And hundreds of millions of other Muslims cheer them on.
Let's go further. There are no countries that actively support and espouse a doctrine of Judaism that calls on Jews to commit terrorism. However, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Qatar, Afghanistan and other countries actively support terrorism or have those in positions of power who do.
I am not done!
There is no Jewish Al Qeada
There is no Jewish ISIS
There is no Jewish Hamas or Hezbollah
And Ashleigh, before you ignorantly say that Israel is the Jewish version of ISIS, let me remind you that Israel has given back to Arabs more territory (after winning them when attacked by Arabs) than the total of her present landmass. Israel, since 1948, has offered peace treaty after peace treaty to the Arab nations. From the ashes of the Holocaust, this evil world had a moment of sanity where they allowed the Jews who were not murdered by the Nazis to establish their own country on their historic homeland—which had been under British control, not Arab.
There are no Jewish schools teaching their children how to use knives and guns to kill Jews. Yet we see in social media Muslim children holding knives and guns and declaring, "I want to kill a Jew." When have you ever seen a Jewish child in school being trained to kill Muslims? Are Jewish parents putting guns and knives in the hands of their children and telling them why it is important to kill Muslims? NO!
This is why CNN should suspend or at least censure Ashleigh Banfield for her anti-Semitic and false claims of a Jewish terror threat or that even what happened between 1980-1985 with a tiny fringe group could be compared at all to the threat America now faces with Radical Islamic terror. Since 1968 the nut-jobs in the JDL have killed a total of seven Americans and none since 1985. Twice as many were murdered last week in San Bernardino. Add to that Fort Hood 13, Chattanooga 5, Boston 4, Marquette Park, IL 5, and of course 9/11 2,976.
Let CNN here your voice at http://edition.cnn.com/feedback/ or post this blog with the hashtags #CNN, #AshleighBanfield
http://cdn.charismanews.com/plugins/content/cm_endofarticlemessages/torch1.png
For a limited time, we are extending our celebration of the 40th anniversary of Charisma. As a special offer, you can get 40 issues of Charisma magazine for only $40! (https://secure.strangmagazines.com/~strangma/charisma/2015/40years/?utm_source=charismanews.com&utm_medium=article end text&utm_campaign=40th Anniversary)
NEW from CHARISMA: Do you want to encounter the Holy Spirit and hear God speak to you? Increase your faith, discover freedom, and draw near to God! Click Here (https://secure.strangmagazines.com/~strangma/LITS/devotional/?utm_source=charismanews.com&utm_medium=article end text&utm_campaign=LITS)
monty
14th December 2015, 12:21 PM
http://youtu.be/Jibi72kXriM
http://youtu.be/Jibi72kXriM
cheka.
14th December 2015, 01:22 PM
Any clips of this yet?
it would make a great compilation - have to be recording every channel at the same time though
0600 central time was when i saw it. wonder if they do that daily?
it was the lead story on every channel i listed (and certainly more that i didn't check)
Cebu_4_2
14th December 2015, 02:25 PM
it would make a great compilation - have to be recording every channel at the same time though
0600 central time was when i saw it. wonder if they do that daily?
it was the lead story on every channel i listed (and certainly more that i didn't check)
Didn't some late night host put something like this together before? Might have been John Stewart?
midnight rambler
14th December 2015, 02:36 PM
Didn't some late night host put something like this together before? Might have been John Stewart?
Nope, Conan O'Brien, and it was the local noozcasts, not the networks. Mostly 'human interest' stuff.
Cebu_4_2
14th December 2015, 02:49 PM
http://youtu.be/Hh_Kx7UKndI
https://youtu.be/Hh_Kx7UKndI
Horn
14th December 2015, 03:42 PM
I saw it on CNN this morning, could be that the Cruz campaign just did a large spot purchase to get some time in on the networks, I dunno?
But the campaigns appear to operate that way in waves these days, and they do purchase airtime from news networks to my knowledge.
PatColo
2nd July 2016, 07:07 AM
Donald Trump Defends Israel After ‘Nasty’ Zionist Question (http://www.renegadetribune.com/donald-trump-defends-israel-nasty-zionist-question/)
July 1, 2016 (http://www.renegadetribune.com/donald-trump-defends-israel-nasty-zionist-question/) renegade (http://www.renegadetribune.com/author/renegade/) 5 Comments
(http://www.renegadetribune.com/donald-trump-defends-israel-nasty-zionist-question/#comments)
Thursday, June 30, 2016: At a campaign event in Manchester, NH, Donald Trump responded to a question from a man who said he was opposed to wasting our military resources in the Middle East on behalf of ‘Zionist’ Israel.
After receiving the Algemeiner Liberty Award, Trump said he supports Israel 1,000%, but when confronted with this “nasty” question on Israel, he only said he supports Israel 100%. This downgrading of support means he is totally against the jewish power structure and on our side, guys!
< 2 mins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2UO8GwB9TE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2UO8GwB9TE
StreetsOfGold
2nd July 2016, 07:27 AM
the Jews. All they care about is money
But Gentiles don't? This is your typical JESUIT speak single out ONE particular "race" to HIDE BEHIND, point fingers at and BLAME and for what? Something IMPLIED that "gentiles" DON'T care about?!!?
Pfffffffffffffffffff
EE_
2nd July 2016, 09:19 AM
But Gentiles don't? This is your typical JESUIT speak single out ONE particular "race" to HIDE BEHIND, point fingers at and BLAME and for what? Something IMPLIED that "gentiles" DON'T care about?!!?
Pfffffffffffffffffff
Most Gentiles I know, care about friends, family, God, home and our country...and money. Jews only care about money.
Even though Jews made their home in the US, they have no loyalty to our country. Most are Atheists. Friends and family are only business associates to be used for gain, i.e. more money.
I think they are the most miserable hateful people on the planet.
Joshua01
2nd July 2016, 12:03 PM
Fuck the jews. They'll be getting a good helping of Trump Stew and it's going to be nice to see them have to shut up and eat it. Trump is placating to them because he knows he needs their support at some level to win this election. When he gets elected he'll treat the jews like Obama treated us for 8 years
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.