The Donald finally cites Bible verse, but it doesn't exist

[midnight rambler]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQR81t21b5Y

The Bible is a prop for The Donald -


"...because this is a group that fully understands bibles"

Classic. lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVJ0i4_hkXI

[govcheetos]

Maybe his copy is unedited.

The David Pakman Show

Trump is still a douche, at least not a politician douche, but not really much better.

[ximmy]

He's not the only one.. The greatest experts on the bible are those who have never read it.

[Santa]

He probably just confused a Bible verse for something from the Talmud a rabbi told him back in Brooklyn when he was a kid.

[Horn]

wtf is this?

http://gold-silver.us/forum/image.php?u=3546&dateline=1442881301

he's doing much better than I ever thought he could in the bible belt, its either that or I am being completely propagandaized.

[StreetsOfGold]

The Bible makes the best people in the world - Thomas (now in hell) Jefferson
The Bible is the best book in the world - John (most likely saved and now in heaven) Adams

[Jerrylynnb]

I've heard the story before about Constantine gathering a group of scholars in the 4th century AD, and charging them with the task of sifting through several pamphlets and letters, extant in that day, concerning various adherents to the growing worship of the Christ. It is claimed that his purpose was entirely political, as he was involved in a difficult military campaign, and he needed the full support of the many Christians in his realm. It seems that this group of scholars met, reviewed potential writings to include, or exclude, as per Constantine's directive, and, it was this group, formed for political purposes, who decided which writings (what we call "books") would be included in the Christian bible.

If that story, told in Roman history, is true, is doesn't speak favorably for the veracity, or even religious significance, of the bible they came up with. None of the authors of the letters, or pamphlets, were still alive, no peer reviews were to be found, and, no method for authentication of the true authorship nor contents could possibly have been available.

And if Constantin's charge was entirely political (he reportedly refused to embrace Christianity himself until his death-bed, many years later), and this group answered his charge, its a stretch to imply anything godly about the results - no? Wouldn't it be like someone, centuries later, saying that those who met and drafted the US Constitution were "inspired" by god and the resulting document is somehow "holy"? Who would believe such nonsense?

Just a thought - pretending to view things in a scholarly way.

[Spectrism]

When you are a real one, it is easy to spot a fake one.