U.S. Soldiers ORDERED to Ignore Sick Crimes: We Can Hear Them Screaming but Can’t Do

[Cebu_4_2]

U.S. Soldiers ORDERED to Ignore Sick Crimes: We Can Hear Them Screaming but Can’t Do Anything

We have been told repeatedly over the years that one of the main reasons U.S. troops remain in Afghanistan, aside from ensuring some form of democracy takes hold, is to protect and defend the rights of oppressed women and children.

Unfortunately, that simply doesn’t apply if the child is a young boy being sexually abused by the men of the Afghan security forces.

“Generally, allegations of child sexual abuse by Afghan military or police personnel would be a matter of domestic Afghan criminal law,” said Col. Brian Tribus, spokesman for the American command in the country, noting that U.S. service members are not required to report it.

“The American policy of nonintervention is intended to maintain good relations with the Afghan police and militia units the United States has trained to fight the Taliban,” read a recent report from The New York Times.

The report continued, “It also reflects a reluctance to impose cultural values in a country where pederasty is rife, particularly among powerful men, for whom being surrounded by young teenagers can be a mark of social status.”

Sadly, the sexual abuse of children is a common practice in Afghanistan, often referred to as “bacha bazi,” loosely translated as “boy play.”

“American soldiers and Marines have been instructed not to intervene — in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases, according to interviews and court records,” the Times noted.

However, this policy of treating the sexual abuse of children as an acceptable cultural practice –rather than the disgusting evil that it clearly is — has actually served to alienate some of the villages American forces have worked hard to win over during the past decade of occupation.

Gregory Buckley Sr., father of a Marine shot and killed by a young Afghan boy during an insider attack, believes the overlooking of the abuse led to his son’s death.

“At night we can hear them screaming, but we’re not allowed to do anything about it,” Lance Cpl. Gregory Buckley Jr. reportedly told his father shortly before his death, noting that he was told by his superior officers to “look the other way because it’s their culture.”

An Army sergeant and his commanding officer were recently relieved of duty after reportedly beating an Afghan police commander accused of raping a 12-year-old boy in 2011. Their case has been picked up by combat veteran and California Rep. Duncan Hunter, who noted that other Afghan officials commended the men for their actions against the rapist.

Unfortunately, the liberal practice of tolerating and respecting every other cultural norm besides our own has taken hold in the military brass, who have instructed their personnel to tolerate all Afghan customs, even if they are clearly immoral or inhumane.

“You cannot try to impose American values and American norms onto the Afghan culture because they’re completely differen t… We can report and we can encourage them,” declared Army Col. Steve Johnson. “We do not have any power or the ability to use our hands to compel them to be what we see as morally better.”

If Col. Johnson cannot understand that there isn’t much that isn’t “morally better” than child rape, he’s a disgrace to the uniform and an embarrassment to America. Shame on him.

[mick silver]

it look as we free them to do what they want to who ever they want to do , this make you wonder how may us troops are doing the same if we let this fly by

[midnight rambler]

Guess what little boys who get raped by members of their community do when they become big enough to hold down little boys.

And of course we need to be welcoming 'refugees' from the sandbox with open arms.

[palani]

Guess what little boys who get raped by members of their community do when they become big enough to hold down little boys..

We could always ask little Johnny Gosch this question ...

https://cut2thetruth.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/is-jeff-gannon-actually-johnny-gosch-frankilin-cover-upo-lawrence-king-pedophile-scandal-white-house-press-core.jpg?w=381&h=288

https://cut2thetruth.wordpress.com/tag/johnny-gosch/

[Twisted Titan]

Any man that can turn his back on the cries of a child begin raped because he wants job seecurity or his next promotion

Will have much to account for on the last day.

[midnight rambler]

We could always ask little Johnny Gosch this question ...

https://cut2thetruth.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/is-jeff-gannon-actually-johnny-gosch-frankilin-cover-upo-lawrence-king-pedophile-scandal-white-house-press-core.jpg?w=381&h=288

https://cut2thetruth.wordpress.com/tag/johnny-gosch/

Little Johnny ended up with the big leagues, fat chance of that happening for some poor kid in a dirt-poor third world country.

http://i41.tinypic.com/dz8lcl.jpg

[cheka.]

US soldier with cries of his own...after meeting some of kc's finest africans

http://www.kctv5.com/story/30122708/soldier-beaten-senseless-by-6-men-outside-plaza-restaurant

KANSAS CITY, MO (KCTV) -

An active member of the U.S. Army was viciously beaten by a group of six young men outside a Country Club Plaza area restaurant, and Kansas City police haven't made any arrests.

The investigation was hampered because the dining establishment, Zocaola Mexican restaurant, didn't have any working security cameras, according to Kansas City police.

The 37-year-old soldier suffered a significant loss of blood after he suffered numerous broken bones in his face, possible optic nerve damage to one of his eyes and a skull fracture. The man's injuries were serious, but he is expected to survive, according to a Kansas City police report.

As of Friday, the victim was still in the hospital. The man is on active duty at a nearby military facility.

Sgt. Kari Thompson of the Kansas City Police Department said Friday that the injured man accidentally bumped into another man inside the restaurant, which is at 620 W. 48th St.

The man bumped tried to start a fight, and restaurant management kicked him out.

About 12:10 a.m. Sept. 19, the soldier walked out of the restaurant and the man he bumped and a gang of his buddies were waiting for him because they were "looking for a fight," according to a Kansas City Police Department report.

A witness said the suspect sucker punched the soldier. The gang then began to punch and kick the prone man.

Friends of the soldier heard the fight and tried to rush to his aid. Two of them were kicked and punched, which required paramedics to treat them at the scene. One of the men who rushed to help his friend was punched in the face with a closed fist. A second man suffered a bloody nose and mouth.

As police were called, the hoodlums jumped in a white vehicle and raced from the scene.

One of the men with the primary aggressor had an open tab at the bar and had left his debit card behind. Police have that person's name, but that still hasn't led to any arrests.

"It should be noted that all the involved parties were heavily intoxicated," according to the police report.

The brutal attack has stirred outrage on social media because the victim and his friends are white while the attackers were young black men in their mid to late 20s.

The police report did not provide any additional details on the soldier and his friends.

[mick silver]

Pentagon-Protected Pedophiles By Philippe Gastonne - September 29, 2015 $(document).ready(function(){ var defaultP = parseInt($('#article_main').css('font-size')); var count = 0; var elements = ['#article_main *', '.article_text *', '.article_text_newsletter *']; $('.plus').click(function(){ if ( count <= 1 ) { $(elements).each(function(key, val) { $(val).css('font-size', parseInt($(val).css('font-size'))+1); }); count++; }; //alert( "Currently at " + count ); }); }); 10 Rampant sexual abuse of children has long been a problem in Afghanistan, particularly among armed commanders who dominate much of the rural landscape and can bully the population. The practice is called bacha bazi, literally "boy play," and American soldiers and Marines have been instructed not to intervene — in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases, according to interviews and court records. The policy has endured as American forces have recruited and organized Afghan militias to help hold territory against the Taliban. But soldiers and Marines have been increasingly troubled that instead of weeding out pedophiles, the American military was arming them in some cases and placing them as the commanders of villages — and doing little when they began abusing children. "The reason we were here is because we heard the terrible things the Taliban were doing to people, how they were taking away human rights," said Dan Quinn, a former Special Forces captain who beat up an American-backed militia commander for keeping a boy chained to his bed as a sex slave. "But we were putting people into power who would do things that were worse than the Taliban did — that was something village elders voiced to me." – New York Times, Sept. 20, 2015 That evil acts occur when nations go to war is no surprise. Soldiers arrive already expecting it, their leaders having described the enemy as vermin worthy of death. What some American troops found in Afghanistan is different. It was not an evil they brought with them, nor is it the evil they came to destroy. It was pre-existing evil and their leaders told them to ignore it. Some soldiers could not ignore the evil. At least one paid with his life, if the New York Times report is correct. Others lost their careers. To what end? In what meaningful sense is any American any safer or more secure because our troops defended pedophiles? The answer is obvious. Young soldiers and Marines who thought they enlisted to protect their country instead had to protect child rapists. Why? Because "we" needed the rapists to accomplish "our" mission. What was this mission? No one knows, the war long since having gone on autopilot. Even if one accepts the official 9/11 narrative, any connection that existed between that event and Afghanistan in 2001 is long gone in 2015. There is no reason for American troops to be there at all, and certainly no reason for them to protect those engaging in acts that would merit imprisonment in the country they are ostensibly serving. Now, one could respond that the Afghan culture accepted "boy play" long before Americans arrived. Our presence there might limit its extent, while it would thrive in our absence. This may be true, but we do not invade other countries whose social practices we consider abhorrent. If that is the goal, we will need a much larger military. A much larger military may be exactly the point. Unending overseas war may not make the United States any safer, but it definitely makes some Americans wealthier. If our soldiers have to stand by while Afghan boys suffer, so much the better. The boys will grow up hating Americans and become more enemies in need of eradication. Score another win for the military-industrial complex – and another loss for humanity. - See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/36558/Pentagon-Protected-Pedophiles/#sthash.IWWrsspc.dpuf

[monty]

The Daily Bell - Pentagon-Protected Pedophiles


http://www.thedailybell.com/images/library/cantdeal.jpg





Rampant sexual abuse of children has long been a problem in Afghanistan, particularly among armed commanders who dominate much of the rural landscape and can bully the population. The practice is called bacha bazi, literally "boy play," and American soldiers and Marines have been instructed not to intervene — in some cases, not even when their Afghan allies have abused boys on military bases, according to interviews and court records.


The policy has endured as American forces have recruited and organized Afghan militias to help hold territory against the Taliban. But soldiers and Marines have been increasingly troubled that instead of weeding out pedophiles, the American military was arming them in some cases and placing them as the commanders of villages — and doing little when they began abusing children.


"The reason we were here is because we heard the terrible things the Taliban were doing to people, how they were taking away human rights," said Dan Quinn, a former Special Forces captain who beat up an American-backed militia commander for keeping a boy chained to his bed as a sex slave. "But we were putting people into power who would do things that were worse than the Taliban did — that was something village elders voiced to me." – New York Times (http://nyti.ms/1KrOuSM), Sept. 20, 2015


That evil acts occur when nations go to war is no surprise. Soldiers arrive already expecting it, their leaders having described the enemy as vermin worthy of death. What some American troops found in Afghanistan is different. It was not an evil they brought with them, nor is it the evil they came to destroy. It was pre-existing evil and their leaders told them to ignore it.


Some soldiers could not ignore the evil. At least one paid with his life, if the New York Times report is correct. Others lost their careers. To what end? In what meaningful sense is any American any safer or more secure because our troops defended pedophiles?


The answer is obvious. Young soldiers and Marines who thought they enlisted to protect their country instead had to protect child rapists. Why? Because "we" needed the rapists to accomplish "our" mission. What was this mission? No one knows, the war long since having gone on autopilot.
Even if one accepts the official 9/11 narrative, any connection that existed between that event and Afghanistan in 2001 is long gone in 2015. There is no reason for American troops to be there at all, and certainly no reason for them to protect those engaging in acts that would merit imprisonment in the country they are ostensibly serving.


Now, one could respond that the Afghan culture accepted "boy play" long before Americans arrived. Our presence there might limit its extent, while it would thrive in our absence. This may be true, but we do not invade other countries whose social practices we consider abhorrent. If that is the goal, we will need a much larger military.


A much larger military may be exactly the point. Unending overseas war may not make the United States any safer, but it definitely makes some Americans wealthier. If our soldiers have to stand by while Afghan boys suffer, so much the better. The boys will grow up hating Americans and become more enemies in need of eradication. Score another win for the military-industrial complex (http://gold-silver.us/forum/safari-reader://www.thedailybell.com/definitions/params/id/1864/) – and another loss for humanity.



http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/36558/Pentagon-Protected-Pedophiles/

[cheka.]

need to post the video of rep cynthia mckinney grilling people over US defense contractor dyncorp supplying kids for sexual abuse


edit...here is vid of mckinney grilling rumsfeld. man i miss her :(


https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=mr2oQExxGmU

[.41Dave]

During the Taliban's rule, sexual abuse of little boys (bacha bazi) carried the death penalty. Kind of makes you wonder whose "rights" the Fed Gov sent the military there to "protect".