Montana man prosecuted for “Criminal Defamation of Jews”

[PatColo]

in "Free Speech USA":


Prosecutor Justifies Charges Against Man for “Criminal Defamation of Jews” in Montana (http://libertyfight.com/2015/prosecutor_argues_criminal_defamation_of_jews.html )

Posted on October 10, 2015 (http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/prosecutor-justifies-charges-against-man-for-criminal-defamation-of-jews-in-montana/143682) by Misty (http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/author/misty)
Liberty Fight – by Martin Hill

(http://libertyfight.com/2015/prosecutor_argues_criminal_defamation_of_jews.html )



“The holocaust has been proven to be a lie beyond a reasonable doubt…”
“It’s important to note that jews hate free speech & are known bullsh-ters”
“I’m a wage slave to ink and paper dollars we print to bailout jewish mega banks as kikes go on bout #WhitePrivilege & I’m not suppose to kill?” – David Joseph Lenio – facing 10 years in prison for alleged Twitter posts ‘defaming’ Jews


The case of David Joseph Lenio (http://libertyfight.com/2015/David_Joseph_Lenio.html) has received some attention but the prosecutor’s arguments deserve a closer look – particularly since Lenio faces up to ten years in prison on the ‘criminal defemation of jews’ charge alone. As we reported last month, Lenio has been released from prison (http://libertyfight.com/2015/David_Joseph_Lenio_released_prison.html) and the awaits trial.



Article doesn't paste well; read at http://libertyfight.com/2015/prosecutor_argues_criminal_defamation_of_jews.html

[Horn]

Never heard of a "criminal defamation of jews" charge.

Has to be criminal defamation of a person.

How does that slip by an entire court, unless its an all jewish court?

[Shami-Amourae]

It will become law in the United States that if you criticize or question a Jew/The Jews you'll go to jail. If you question the holocaust narrative you'll go to jail.

This was already done in Western Europe, Canada, and Australia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_against_Holocaust_denial

(Some countries it's simply tried as "hate speech".)

It's been pushed in the United States for a long time.

First they'll do it to some random person who no one likes. Then they'll do it to popular person who people sort of don't like. Then they'll do it to everyone.

The United States has been the holdout for Jew-wise people, but that will change as the slobbering idiocy of "people" continue towards the zombie state.


The only irony is the radical Left actually hates Jews now thanks to the whole Muh Brown People slaughter of the Palestinians. That is why Obama, despite being a horrible person, is one of the first in a long time to stand up against the Jewish lobby, not since he cares for America, but because he hates Jews for degenerating Black people into Niggers.


Before Jewish influence:
http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/blogs/behold/2014/12/Gordon%20Parks/1.jpg.CROP.original-original.jpg


After Jewish influence:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YT_DnWRqjM

[Shami-Amourae]

http://s13.postimg.org/l8dkioikn/1441752727934.jpg (http://postimage.org/)

[palani]

http://libertyfight.com/2015/David_Joseph_Lenio_released_prison.html

Read the guys rantings. He is asking for the benefit of an attitude adjustment but to give him the benefit of doubt ... he might have been drunk at the time.

[Ares]

This is what happens when you subject yourself to statutes by answering criminal complaints. Pull it back into common law by filing a claim against the prosecutor and asking for the individual who was harmed by Mr. Lenio's accusations to take the stand.

[PatColo]

^ poorly advised to "wonder aloud" about shooting up a school for sure... maybe some mental hospital time would be in order. But his prosecution isn't for his school rantings... it's only about... you know... I like this tweet:




Feb 15 2015: "If my tax dollars can go to blowing up Palestine #school kids then surely I can tweet about how cool killing school kids is"

[hoarder]

Obama, despite being a horrible person, is one of the first in a long time to stand up against the Jewish lobby, not since he cares for America, but because he hates Jews for degenerating Black people into Niggers.I wouldn't fall for that act unless he abolishes the Federal Reserve.

[Ponce]

Like I keep on saying.........use the word "Zionist" instead of Jew......and you will be safe.

I am still waiting for them to come after me for having that sign in my yard for the past fourteen years...please, please do.

V

[7th trump]

This is what happens when you subject yourself to statutes by answering criminal complaints. Pull it back into common law by filing a claim against the prosecutor and asking for the individual who was harmed by Mr. Lenio's accusations to take the stand.

Hahahaha......................you've been listening to Palani again haven't you?

Show one case where that stunt actually worked.
Its never worked before and it'll never work now...its just conspiracy bullshit from the internets.
Try doing that in traffic court where you go to court for a speeding ticket where no one was injured.....................doesn't work pal and all it does is show your intelligence level to get suckered into these arm chair lawyer type who spout nothing but bullshit because they
1. Don't know how to read the law.
2. Don't understand how the law works or
3. Believe theres a conspiracy in every statute.

I'll clue you in on something................most of the statutes are common law or based on the common law.

[monty]

common law of England ​if not in conflict of the laws of this state.


http://law.justia.com/codes/nevada/2013/chapter-1/statute-1.030

NEVADA Revised Statutes

Universal Citation: NV Rev Stat § 1.030 (2013) (http://law.justia.com/citations.html)
The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to or in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the United States, or the Constitution and laws of this State, shall be the rule of decision in all the courts of this State.
[1911 CPA 532; RL 5474; NCL 9021]

Disclaimer: These codes may not be the most recent version. Nevada (http://law.justia.com/codes/states.html) may have more current or accurate information. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or the information linked to on the state site. Please check official sources.

[Shami-Amourae]

I wouldn't fall for that act unless he abolishes the Federal Reserve.

With the Fed doing zero interest rates it operates as a GibsMeDat generator so Obama can always have money in his "stash".

[Shami-Amourae]

This is what happens when you subject yourself to statutes by answering criminal complaints. Pull it back into common law by filing a claim against the prosecutor and asking for the individual who was harmed by Mr. Lenio's accusations to take the stand.

That doesn't happen IRL.

http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/c4/6c4f6f92-e43a-5f15-ac65-9eb7bf7bd16d/5171d479307ba.preview-620.jpg

[Horn]

"Jews" itself is a derogatory defamation term, if he is able to be charged so too should the prosecutor.

Its comparable to the charge stating "Criminal Defamation of Niggers"

[hoarder]

With the Fed doing zero interest rates it operates as a GibsMeDat generator so Obama can always have money in his "stash".Obama wouldn't be in the White House if he wasn't a completely controlled puppet or maybe a Jew himself. Why would they allow it? They control electronic voting.

[Ares]

I'll clue you in on something................most of the statutes are common law or based on the common law.

Un huh sure. So it shouldn't be a problem for the prosecutor to produce an injured party then right? The state cannot be an injured party prosecuting the defendant and the judge. That's a conflict of interests. Not to mention is the state going to take the stand so that the defendant can face his accuser according to the 6th Amendment? Sure show me a state that can fog a mirror and I'll be impressed.

Is the Constitution the law of the land, or isn't it? How can a statute override law?

[Ares]

That doesn't happen IRL.

http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/6/c4/6c4f6f92-e43a-5f15-ac65-9eb7bf7bd16d/5171d479307ba.preview-620.jpg

Real life is what you and I live. What the state promotes is illusion.

On a side note, check out the fat red faced pig in the center. He looks like he's going to pass out from a heat stroke.. LOL

[mick silver]

state promotes a boot to the head if you do not follow alone with there plans

[palani]

most of the statutes are common law or based on the common law.

What a moronic thing to state. Common law is Lex Non-scripta .... aka ... 'unwritten'.

Show me an unwritten statute.

[Horn]

oh for the love of Yeshua, please don't turn this into another 7th Palani debate

[gunDriller]

So far they do sound like trumped up charges.

The thing that will get the Jewish legal system (even in Montana) riled up is advocating the killing of Jews ... I think.


It would be real good to know exactly what line he crossed

and also how he's doing in terms of creating ripples. Maybe he's doing a good job
locally in MT making people question the official WHOPPER US gov. conspiracy fantasy
about 9-11.


I think it's pretty much a compliment when the Jew legal system goes after a person for telling the truth.

[midnight rambler]

I'll clue you in on something................most of the statutes are common law or based on the common law.

Surely you're the clueless one since under the common law a criminal action requires a damaged or injured party* whereas under the statutes the state actors draw up criminal charges routinely when there's not a damaged or injured party to be found anywhere.

Where's the injured party when someone does magic mushrooms, peyote buttons, or smokes a joint**?

*the common law remedy for the accused is having a damaged or injured party who can be put on the witness stand under oath so he has to face the accused, be cross-questioned by the accused, and the burden of proof is on the accuser

*and of course all the above are a part of God's creation He obviously intended for our use, and God doesn't make mistakes

[midnight rambler]

Read an article somewhere the other day elaborating on how the tribe is infiltrating and taking over Montana.

[7th trump]

Surely you're the clueless one since under the common law a criminal action requires a damaged or injured party* whereas under the statutes the state actors draw up criminal charges routinely when there's not a damaged or injured party to be found anywhere.

Where's the injured party when someone does magic mushrooms, peyote buttons, or smokes a joint**?

*the common law remedy for the accused is having a damaged or injured party who can be put on the witness stand under oath so he has to face the accused, be cross-questioned by the accused, and the burden of proof is on the accuser

*and of course all the above are a part of God's creation He obviously intended for our use, and God doesn't make mistakes

You've got to be one of the dumbest tools out there...next to palani.


Common Law is a type of legal methodology undertaken by a specific jurisdiction; the adoption of a statutory legal structure mandated by the precepts expressed within Common Law are considered to differ from those jurisdictions undertaking a legal methodology rooted in Civil Law.
Common Law is deeply rooted in Roman Law, which a multitude of historians credit as providing the earliest incarnations of legal statues and stipulations; not only were a variety of Roman Laws absorbed by the tenets of Common Law, but many facets of Roman Law are considered to be both legally – and structurally – sound despite its development dating back to 439 BCE. Therefore, when someone asks what common law is, it must be understood that the concepts latent in this legal methodology date back to the earliest of times, in regards to the scope of law.
How does Common Law differ from other legal methodologies?
Common law (also referred to as case law or precedent) is developed by judges through the decisions rendered in a legal forum, such as a court room or tribunal. This creation process differentiates from other legal methodologies, which predominantly create their interpretative process through legislative statutes or a decision rendered by the underlying executive branch.
A common law legal system is a legal methodology that places a significant weight on precedent and on the principle that it is unfair to treat similar legal matters differently on different occasions.
In a common law setting, if the parties disagree on what the underlying law is, an idealized common law court will evaluate past precedential decisions of relevant court systems. If a similar dispute has been resolved in a previous court case, a common law system will evaluate the precedential decisions and apply it to the underlying legal issue at hand.
Basic Principles of Common Law:
In a generic common law jurisdiction several stages of analysis and research are required to determine what the underlying law is in a given situation. The court or presiding judge must ascertain the facts, then, locate any relevant laws, statutes and cases that may apply to the underlying legal issue. Following the retrieval of coordinating statutes and cases, the judge must then extract the principles and statements issued by various courts. The retrieval of this information is used to determine how the common law court is likely to rule on the facts of the case at hand.
In a common law system, later decisions and those decisions offered by a higher court will carry more weight than judgments delivered by lower courts or that took place in earlier cases. After this process has been satisfied, the judge or presiding authority, must integrate the reasons given to determine what the law is. When this is accomplished, the underlying law or legal issue will be applied to the facts offered in the particular case


You're a fool midnight liar....a fools fool....aka palani's fool!

[palani]

Common Law is a type of legal methodology
So much more than that ....


THE municipal law of England, or the rule of civil conduct prefcribed to the inhabitants of this kingdom, may with fufficient propriety be divided into two kinds; the lex non fcripta, the unwritten, or common law; and the lex fcripta, the written, or ftatute law.

THE lex non fcripta, or unwritten law, includes not only general cuftoms, or the common law properly fo called; but alfo the particular cuftoms of certain parts of the kingdom; and likewife thofe particular laws, that are by cuftom obferved only in certain courts and jurifdictions.

WHEN I call thefe parts of our law leges non fcriptae, I would not be underftood as if all thofe laws were at prefent merely oral, or communicated from the former ages to the prefent folely by word of mouth. It is true indeed that, in the profound ignorance of letters which formerly overfpread the whole weftern world, all laws were intirely traditional, for this plain reafon, that the nations among which they prevailed had but little idea of writing. Thus the Britifh as well as the Gallic druids committed all their laws as well as learning to memory a; and it is faid of the primitive Saxons here, as well as their brethren on the continent, that leges fola memoria et ufu retinebant b. But with us at prefent the monuments and evidences of our legal cuftoms are contained in the records of the feveral courts of juftice, in books of reports and judicial decifions, and in the treatifes of learned fages of the profeffion, preferved and handed down to us from the times of higheft antiquity. However I therefore ftile thefe parts of our law leges non fcripta c, becaufe their original inftitution and authority are not fet down in writing, as acts of parliament are, but they receive their binding power, and the force of laws, by long and immemorial ufage, and by their univerfal reception throughout the kingdom. In like manner as Aulus Gellius defines the jus non fcriptum to be that, which is “tacito “et illiterato hominum confenfu et moribus expreffum.”

OUR antient lawyers, and particularly Fortefcue c, infift with abundance of warmth, that thefe cuftoms are as old as the primitive Britons, and continued down, through the feveral mutations of government and inhabitants, to the prefent time, unchanged and unadulterated. This may be the cafe as to fome; but in general, as Mr. Selden in his notes obferves, this affertion muft be underftood with many grains of allowance; and ought only to fignify, as the truth feems to be, that there never was any formal exchange of one fyftem of laws for another: though doubtlefs by the intermixture of adventitious nations, the Romans, the Picts, the Saxons, the Danes, and the Normans, they muft have infenfibly introduced and incorporated many of their own cuftoms with thofe that were before eftablifhed: thereby in all probability improving the texture and wifdom of the whole, by the accumulated wifdom of divers particular countries. Our laws, faith lord Bacon d, are mixed as our language: and as our language is fo much the richer, the laws are the more complete.

but none of this applies to you ... Law (common law) requires SUBSTANCE and excludes BANKRUPTS. You don't want Law (common law) in your currency you are not going to get common law in your courts. This leaves you with the fantasy land of EQUITY and STATUTE jurisdictions.

[7th trump]

So much more than that ....



but none of this applies to you ... Law (common law) requires SUBSTANCE and excludes BANKRUPTS. You don't want Law (common law) in your currency you are not going to get common law in your courts. This leaves you with the fantasy land of EQUITY and STATUTE jurisdictions.

Boy are you stupid....thats in Englands jurisdiction....not the USofA.

[BrewTech]

Boy are you stupid....thats in Englands jurisdiction....not the USofA.


Another thread destroyed by a complete douche. Franks, do me a favor... Ban either him or me permanently, please!

[EE_]

Like I keep on saying.........use the word "Zionist" instead of Jew......and you will be safe.

I am still waiting for them to come after me for having that sign in my yard for the past fourteen years...please, please do.

V

WHY ORTHODOX JEWS ARE OPPOSED TO A ZIONIST STATE
First some introductions:

1) What is "The People of Israel" ?

The People of Israel have existed for thousands of years.
They have their own particular, essential nature.
The Torah is the source of their essential nature.
Without Torah and Faith there is no People of Israel.
Whoever denies the Torah and the Faith is no longer part of the People of Israel.
The purpose of the People of Israel in this world is Divine Service.
Their salvation is occupation in Divine Service.

2) What is Zionism?

Zionism is a relatively new thing.
It has only existed for a century.
Zionism redefines the true essential nature of the People of Israel, and substitutes for it a completely contradictory and opposite character - a materialistic worldly nation.
Their misfortune is lack of what other nations possess, i.e. a state and army.
Their salvation is possession of a state and army etc.
This is clearly spelled out in the circles of Zionist thought, and among the leaders of the Zionist State, that through changing the nature and character of the People of Israel and by changing their way of thinking they can set before the People of Israel "their salvation" -- a state and an army.
The People of Israel oppose the so-called "State of Israel" for four reasons:

FIRST -- The so-called "State of Israel" is diametrically opposed and completely contradictory to the true essence and foundation of the People of Israel, as is explained above. The only time that the People of Israel were permitted to have a state was two thousand years ago when the glory of the creator was upon us, and likewise in the future when the glory of the creator will once more be revealed, and the whole world will serve Him, then He Himself (without any human effort or force of arms) will grant us a kingdom founded on Divine Service. However, a worldly state, like those possessed by other peoples, is contradictory to the true essence of the People of Israel. Whoever calls this the salvation of Israel shows that he denies the essence of the People of Israel, and substitutes another nature, a worldly materialistic nature, and therefore sets before them, a worldly materialistic "salvation," and the means of achieving this "salvation" is also worldly and materialistic i.e. to organize a land and army. However, the true salvation of the People of Israel is to draw close to the Creator. This is not done by organization and force of arms. Rather it is done by occupation to Torah and good deeds.

SECOND -- Because of all of this and other reasons the Torah forbids us to end the exile and establish a state and army until the Holy One, blessed He, in His Glory and Essence will redeem us. This is forbidden even if the state is conducted according to the law of the Torah because arising from the exile itself is forbidden, and we are required to remain under the rule of the nations of the world, as is explained in the book VAYOEL MOSHE. If we transgress this injunction, He will bring upon us (may we be spared) terrible punishment.

THIRD -- Aside from arising from exile, all the deeds of the Zionists are diametrically opposed to the Faith and the Torah. Because the foundation of the Faith and Torah of Israel is that the Torah was revealed from heaven, and there is reward for those who obey it and punishment for those who transgress it. The entire People of Israel is required to obey the Torah, and whoever doesn't want to, ceases to be part of the congregation of Israel.

FOURTH -- Aside from the fact that they themselves do not obey the Torah they do everything they can to prevent anyone they get under their power from fulfilling the commands of the Torah, the claims to freedom of religion are lies. They fight with all of their strength to destroy the Faith of Israel.

The Zionists claim that they are the saviors of Israel, but this is refuted by twelve things:

FIRST -- If one contemplates the two thousand years of our exile, take any hundred years even the hardest, one will not find as much suffering, bloodshed, and catastrophes for the People of Israel in the period of the Zionists, and it is known that most of the suffering of this century was caused by the Zionists, as our Rabbis warned us would be the case.

SECOND -- It is openly stated in books written by the founders of Zionism that the means by which they planned to establish a state was by instigating anti-Semitism, and undermining the security of the Jews in all the lands of the world, until they would be forced to flee to their state. And thus they did - They intentionally infuriated the German people and fanned the flames of Nazi hatred, and they helped the Nazis, with trickery and deceit, to take whole Jewish communities off to the concentration camps, and the Zionists themselves admit this. (See the books Perfidy, Min Hameitzor, etc.). The Zionists continue to practice this strategy today. They incite anti-Semitism and then they present themselves as the "saviors". Here are two replies given by Leaders of the Zionists during World War II, when they were asked for money to help ransom Jews from the Nazis. Greenbaum said "One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland." (G-d forbid).
Weitzman said, "The most important part of the Jewish people is already in the land (of Israel) and those who are left, are unimportant" (May we be spared).

THIRD -- We see that most of world Jewry lives in security and under good physical conditions, and have no desire to go live in the Zionist State. Whereas many people have left the Zionist State to live under better conditions in other lands.

FOURTH -- The Zionists make a great deal of propaganda to induce people to immigrate to their state. If their state is so beneficial why do they have to make so much propaganda.

FIFTH -- Because nobody wants the Zionists to "save" them. The only way they can get immigrants is by promising poor people material benefits, and even then very few people respond.

SIXTH -- The Zionist State is always threatened by the dangers of war. Whereas the rest of world Jewry live in peace and security, (Except in a few places where the Zionists have undermined their security and fanned the flames of hatred)

SEVENTH -- The Zionist State could not continue to exist without economic support from Jews living outside of the Zionist State.

EIGHTH -- The Zionist State is on the verge of economic collapse, and their money is nearly worthless.

NINTH -- The Zionist State persecute all Jews who are loyal to their Faith.

TENTH -- They start wars that endanger the Jewish People, for the sake of their own political interests.

ELEVENTH - According to the Torah the path of safety is following ways of peace not starting fights with other nations, as the Zionists do.

TWELFTH -- Even if the Zionists could and would provide physical security it would be at the expense of our Faith and Our Torah the true People of Israel prefer death rather than life at such a cost.

It is therefore clear that Zionism is not the savior of the people of Israel. Rather it is their greatest misfortune.

Even though there are some observant Jews and rabbis, who approve of the Zionists, this is not the opinion of the Torah.

The Zionists have enough control over the American news media to make sure that only their side of the story is heard.

They make it look like all Jewry and their rabbis are Zionists, but this is false propaganda.

The most important Rabbis and the majority of religious Jewry are opposed to Zionism, but their voice is not heard because of Zionist control of American news media.

The Zionists terrorize everyone who speaks out against them.

That part of the Jewish masses which is fooled by Zionist propaganda puts pressure on their Rabbis not to speak out.

Between the terror and the pressure of the masses most of the Rabbis are prevented from speaking out.

We bring three testimonies of the true opinion of the Torah.

1) In the past two thousand years of the dangers and sufferings of exile not once did any of the Sages of Israel suggest that we make a state to protect ourselves. In every generation we had thousands of Sages well versed in the Torah.

2) We have thousands of legal work of Torah law that have been handed down to us by the Sages of all generations. Not once do we see a word suggesting the establishment of a state. What we do find is warnings against it.

3) The founders of Zionism were all atheists who denied the Torah. All the Torah Sages of that time opposed them and opposed Zionism, saying that Zionism would lead only to destruction.

However the true People of Israel will never change their nature or give up their Faith because of the strength the Creator gives them.

Zionism is a foreign growth in the body of the Jewish People. The end will be that it will rid itself of this foreign growth and remain pure.

Zionism has overcome the Jewish people by force, fraud and terror, but none of this will help them because the truth will always remain with the help of the Creator.

Zionism will not replace the Jewish People. The Jewish People will remain strong in their faith and the Zionist State will cease to exist.

It is therefore, our demand that the State that calls itself ISRAEL, should cease to exist. Since this won't be done, we demand that they cease to call themselves "Israel", because their entire being is in complete opposition to the true People of Israel. The true People of Israel deny them permission to call themselves by that name. The Zionist leaders have no right to set themselves up as the representatives and spokesmen of the true People of ISRAEL.

Since we know they will not fulfill this demand either we feel that at least we cry out the truth. The truth will always remain the truth. By no means or force can the truth be changed. Even if all the world would say that one and one is three, the truth will remain that one and one is two.

Let the truth be declared. The use of the Name "ISRAEL" by that State is a complete falsification. The People of Israel have nothing to do with that State. Zionism and its State have no share and no part in the true ISRAEL.

http://www.nkusa.org/AboutUs/Zionism/opposition.cfm

[palani]

thats in Englands jurisdiction
As adopted in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty seven (MDCCLXXXVII)

[Ponce]

Very good post EE........almost no one knows where the word "Semite" comes from and who they really are......the real Jews themselves are really no angels and is not because of religious issues but rather because of monetary greed.

V

[7th trump]

Another thread destroyed by a complete douche. Franks, do me a favor... Ban either him or me permanently, please!

Ahhhh....your panty's in a bunch there brewtech?
Sorry to hear that.

[BrewTech]

Ahhhh....your panty's in a bunch there brewtech?
Sorry to hear that.


You are a useless troll. But you knew that already, didn't you?

[Ponce]

The worse thing that you can do with a troll is to engage him in a conversation, better to just ignore them (as done to me) and they will simply stop trying to be the center of attention.....ufffffffffff I just hate it when done to me hahhahhahahah.

V

[7th trump]

You are a useless troll. But you knew that already, didn't you?

Wow....you start this crap and then complain about it.
I was engaging with Palani over a relevant issue to the topic....not you.

Lol...that was funny though.....kind of like an idiot getting upset over something and threatening to throw his candy bar on the ground.
Ban him or ban me....hahaha!

How about ban yourself!

[BrewTech]

Wow....you start this crap and then complain about it.
I was engaging with Palani over a relevant issue to the topic....not you.

Lol...that was funny though.....kind of like an idiot getting upset over something and threatening to throw his candy bar on the ground.
Ban him or ban me....hahaha!

How about ban yourself!
You'll go down soon enough.

[hoarder]

The worse thing that you can do with a troll is to engage him in a conversation, better to just ignore them (as done to me) and they will simply stop trying to be the center of attention.....ufffffffffff I just hate it when done to me hahhahhahahah.

VWhat makes you think it's "they"? 7th trump and Brewtech are most likely the same person.

[BrewTech]

what makes you think it's "they"? 7th trump and brewtech are most likely the same person.

lol... I would absolutely love to hear what brings you to this conclusion.

You might consult with couple of people still on this board that have met me in person... I think they will assure you that I am me and 7th definitely is not.

[7th trump]

You'll go down soon enough.

What ever brewtech.....I wasn't off topic nor trolling the thread. I was simply responding to palani.
Better for you to just stay out of it next time over getting your panties all in a bunch.
And if you are going to complain at least act like a man about it.