Paul Joseph Watson: Why Are Men Frightened of Marriage?

[Shami-Amourae]

More young men than ever before are refusing to get married. The reason? "Women aren’t women anymore."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afu1Rwlggf8

[Horn]

Bug killing was always intended to be a coed experience.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijvTiDnWJLE

[Hitch]

I don't think men in general are frightened by marriage, they are just realistic about it. The explosion of the internet has waken a lot of men up, and marriage actually is a bad deal for men. Too many reasons to list.

Women, by nature, place a greater value on relationships, by that I mean their ego is attached to the idea of a relationship, not the partner they are with. Take the women in positions of power, executives, upper management. No wonder they are lonely and depressed. But, they will never realize why. The reason is, women rarely date men who make less money than them, or have a lesser positions of power. There's just not enough available doctors and lawyers to meet supply of all these lonely depressed women. Furthermore, of the available doctors and lawyers, they don't want to be with a type a personality over-achiever woman. They want to come home and relax.

The future does not look good for marriage or monogamous people.

[singular_me]

although I am very much against feminism, please describe the female gender first... if the criteria are based on centuries/millennia of patriarchy, males cannot know what they want and are as misguided as women.

Men and women are not born to reproduce like animals, a childless life should be seen as valuable... but that is all good for NWO armies.

Most people have kids to give themselves a life purpose... maybe time to rethink that to rebalance society.

shami, your japanese icons looks like dolls. ;D

[Shami-Amourae]

shami, your japanese icons looks like dolls. ;D

It's pure autism. She's my 2D Waifu.

Perhaps you need a Husbando.
http://img10.deviantart.net/b065/i/2015/148/7/e/other_side_of_my_husbando_by_okami_wolfgod-d8v40cg.jpg

http://41.media.tumblr.com/110b0e12e1b75968333283deb61ad4a9/tumblr_mvikj74Aej1s5nrxho4_1280.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/havkzib.jpg

http://pre13.deviantart.net/e81f/th/pre/i/2013/285/b/d/romantic_dinner_with_my_husband_by_nihonoaisuru-d6q5x2o.jpg

:p

[Ares]

I didn't get married for a while. I was in my 30s by the time i got married. It took me forever to find a woman who was family oriented, conservative / libertarian, and fit the profile of being a good mother. Nurturing, caring.

Another quality I looked for was also sexual in nature. I was looking for a woman who had less than 5 partners in her past. You'd be amazed at how few woman fit that profile anymore. When I was dating and we got to the history portion of the relationship and I heard the number 15-20, I would not call her again. It's not so much as ego as I didn't want someone to be my wife that had been with a large number of guys.

I think it goes for woman too, ladies on the board feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. You don't want a guy whose been with a large number of woman. Most guys I knew were male whores and screwed anything that moved.

So I avoided that for my potential life partner.

[Ponce]

To have a wife is to have a partner......but.......to have kids is to become a slave.

I know, I know.....you would not trade your kid (kid's) for nothing in the world........but.......how much more would you have without them?....now days to have a kid is to have a life sentence.

V

[Ares]

To have a wife is to have a partner......but.......to have kids is to become a slave.

I know, I know.....you would not trade your kid (kid's) for nothing in the world........but.......how much more would you have without them?....now days to have a kid is to have a life sentence.

V

Depends on how you look at it. I couldn't imagine my life now without my kids. Materialistically yeah I could have a lot more, but mentally, spiritually, and as a person I would not grow or learn.

I think they've taught me a lot more than what I've taught them so far.

[Hitch]

Good post Ares. The only reason to get married is to have kids, and raise those kids in a stable family oriented environment. Kids raised in that environment end up being responsible adults.

That being said, having kids is not part of my calling, so I won't get married. Not that I won't have a life partner at some point, maybe I'll meet the right gal...but, if she's the right gal for me, she wouldn't want to get married either. :)

[Shami-Amourae]

It's really scary how few intelligent people want to have kids anymore.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL1-340ODCM

[singular_me]

there is no model in term of relationships... only the challenge: we do want for ourselves, our lives to be about. Unfortunately propaganda is nothing new and people have little idea, then they wonder why they have dysfunctional families. Even watson says in the vid, men used to get married to have sex (and women give birth every year or two, until they refused intercourse, before the pill)... either ways, that we fix the system or nor, a painful correction/event is around the corner.

[Cebu_4_2]

Why Are Men Frightened of Marriage?

Let's see.... nevermind lol.

Most americanized chicks are gold digging cunts.

[Shami-Amourae]

Huffington Post article in question:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/melanie-hoglind/why-i-question-my-marriage-regularly_b_8363516.html

[Horn]

Huffington Post article in question:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/melanie-hoglind/why-i-question-my-marriage-regularly_b_8363516.html

Someone insert that Manipulator video that Rambler posted a couple weeks back here.

Americanized women have become master manipulators. (Probably out of loss of control fear itself)

Where that gets us, I'm not sure?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2l7ZhPRm3t0

[Hitch]

Someone insert that Manipulator video that Rambler posted a couple weeks back here.

Americanized women have become master manipulators. (Probably out of loss of control fear itself)

Where that gets us, I'm not sure?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2l7ZhPRm3t0

Horn, that is a very profound video. Where that gets us? Right to the heart of the problem.

[Horn]

X was always deeply disturbed that she might end up living some life that wasn't hers somehow.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zgAWHRJC1Y

[Hitch]

Another problem with marriage, Horn. It traps women. If they don't feel like they are living the life they want to live, then they should be free to fly elsewhere.

What I don't like, is that our system rewards them for doing so. She can make you a slave, if she wants to.

I will never have any issue with a woman leaving me. If she takes my freedom though, I have issues.

[singular_me]

Perhaps you need a Husbando.

not really, I have a 7y partner and after a 1 year break we decided to move ahead.

right now I am practicing the art of being happy with myself...

[Hitch]

right now I am practicing the art of being happy with myself...

It's all up to you to be happy. Only you, yourself, can achieve that for yourself. It can't be found from anyone else. Partners can be a fine addition in life, but only if we've found happiness within ourselves first.

[Twisted Titan]

although I am very much against feminism, please describe the female gender first... if the criteria are based on centuries/millennia of patriarchy, males cannot know what they want and are as misguided as women.
. ;D

I disagree whole heartedly

Wheather you like it or not...there is a natural order that has been established and when you run against that order you run into all manner of problems.

Except for a handful of species

The Males are the Protectors and Providors
Females are the Mothers and nuturers

That is the formula that has worked that has succesfully brought us to this moment in time.

[Twisted Titan]

Whenever there is a crisis situation...we all go back to are hardwired programs.

There have been several situations where i instructed women 2 times i did not even know them and they all follwed my instruction without question....it just happened naturally

[Dogman]

I disagree whole heartedly

Wheather you like it or not...there is a natural order that has been established and when you run against that order you run into all manner of problems.

Except for a handful of species

The Males are the Protectors and Providors
Females are the Mothers and nuturers

That is the formula that has worked that has succesfully brought us to this moment in time.Totally agree.

The problems start when the woman starts going around his back or he does the same.

Or he or she married the other with agendas.

But one major problem is ,

Which may or not but probably not is the legal system now weighs on the side of the woman and the women know it and some use it for their advantage here and other country's and give them (women) the benefit of the doubt mostly.

Totally ignoring the rare (?) male that really has worked his ass off trying to make the marriage work, but he can not change her ways. I am talking about the guys that do not wander looking for short term ass.

Women control in general 50% of the wealth and 100% of the pussy !

After they get married and for sure when kids come into the scene.

Fact ;D

[singular_me]

well I see what you mean that since I found out about the Gender Principle, all I can say is that what you describe is not entirely true. It is only true when women really want to become mothers. But my guess is half of the women are not destined to become mothers (but respond social pressure), this because of an existential dualism, that always offers a 3rd option.

I explain this in my book pretty well. This darwinian perception of man is what causes our world troubles.

Until the pill was discovered, many women were living in fear of becoming pregnant 3 weeks out of 4. Until the pill, household rape was pretty common, unless the man could find a prostitute or had a mistress.



I disagree whole heartedly

Wheather you like it or not...there is a natural order that has been established and when you run against that order you run into all manner of problems.

Except for a handful of species

The Males are the Protectors and Providors
Females are the Mothers and nuturers

That is the formula that has worked that has succesfully brought us to this moment in time.

[Hitch]

We need to be honest and truthful. The failings of marriage, as an institution, is really all women's fault.

Men are easy to keep happy. All we need is no drama, lot's of sex, and maybe a good meal. That's it. The rest, we will take care of. Just stay out of our way and let us do what we need to do.

How women can't figure that out, astounds me.

[Dogman]

well I see what you mean that since I found out about the Gender Principle, all I can say is that what you describe is not entirely true. It is only true when women really want to become mothers. But my guess is half of the women are not destined to become mothers (but succumb social pressure), this because of an existential dualism, that always offers a 3rd option.

I explain this in my book pretty well. Quote me where you get your numbers !

Most women do not feel like total woman unless they have a kid or more. And when they diliver that kid cusses all of the male species and husband/boyfrend at the time.

Very loudly and with a screaming tone. ;D

Half?

Give me a break,

Every woman I have ever known wanted kids!

Provide hard links to your statement SM..

[midnight rambler]

We need to be honest and truthful. The failings of marriage, as an institution, is really all women's fault.

Men are easy to keep happy. All we need is no drama, lot's of sex, and maybe a good meal. That's it. The rest, we will take care of. Just stay out of our way and let us do what we need to do.

How women can't figure that out, astounds me.

They've been brainwashed that they deserve it ALL.

[singular_me]

not entirely true either... social pressure is a major factor, hollywood also sells pregnancy pretty well... our society today is way too dysfunctional and prevent way too many from following their dreams. Most parents have jobs they hate to start with. So what kind of kids do they have considering that emotions are passed through the DNA? Many people want kids to escape from existential boredom or anxiety. It always has been this way. Not speaking of the few exceptions out there and on this board but an obvious phenomenon.

I have no link, also say "my guess"... and I stick to it because I am aware of too many other factors coming into play. There are so many ways to dedicate one's life to creativity, having kids is one of them but not the only one.

If we were living in a society that is not imprisoning psyches, most people's choices would be very different. There is no model... the model is a myth.



Quote me where you get your numbers !

Most women do not feel like total woman unless they have a kid or more. And when they diliver that kid cusses all of the male species and husband/boyfrend at the time.

Very loudly and with a screaming tone. ;D

Half?

Give me a break,

Every woman I have ever known wanted kids!

Provide hard links to your statement SM..

[Dogman]

not entirely true either... social pressure is a major factor, hollywood also sells pregnancy pretty well... our society today is way too dysfunctional and prevent way too many from following their dreams. Most parents have jobs they hate to start with. So what kind of kids do they have considering that emotions are passed through the DNA? Many people want kids to escape from existential boredom or anxiety. It always has been this way. Not speaking of the few exceptions on this board but an obvious phenomenon.

I have no link, also say "my guess"... and I stick to it because I am aware of too many other factors coming into play. There are so many ways to dedicate one's life to creativity, having kids is one of them but not the only one. Numbers woman , numbers where did you get them..

Dodge and weave all you want I want numbers to back up your original statement....

[Jerrylynnb]

I was there at the beginning and I saw it happen - I know what the hell I am talking about - no-fault divorce will ruin ANY NATION! Period!

Go back a century, these jew bastards, working with all those millions fleeced from americans by the jewish uppers here (and given carte blanche to Bronstein and Lenin), took advantage of failings in the Romanov's rule to enlist the fight of the proud and great slavic nation to bring down the Romanov dynasty. What is one of the very first unnatural laws Lenin and his crazed killers enacted (and ENFORCED)? NO FAULT DIVORCE.

Get that law translated into English and see how closely worded it is to all the no-fault laws that finally got enacted in the States back in the late 60's, early 70's, starting, of course, with California. The purpose of that law, both in Russia, in the states, and *ANYWHERE* else it is enacted (by jews, of course), is to BREAK THE PROUD SPIRIT of the resourceful caucasian man, who, for centuries, took as his birthright to serve as HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD. There is no better way to break that proud spirit than to serve him up with a no-fault divorce and jail-backed (back-breaking) child support, all the while denying him ANY SAY in the proper upbringing of his own children.

I learned about it in the early 70's here in Texas - an outstanding co-worker came to work one day white as a ghost - he had been met, the evening before, with a deputy sheriff and two policemen, a lawyer, and an eviction notice with divorce papers being served up to him when he had got home from work, all served up on behalf of his wife, with whom he had had another minor (so he thought) spat over some of the habits their teenage daughter was taking on.

He had been a dynamic leader amongst we grunt workers, but, that BROKE HIS SPIRIT.

What had been a tiny, tiny, hardly worth studying for, fraction of the legal profession (divorce proceedings), blossomed into a booming (and I mean B O O M I N G) business.

I predicted then, and I stand by it, that it would take TWO generations of hard-pricked young american males to figure out that they ought not: a) take ANY marriage vows; nor, b) impregnate ANY FEMALUS AMERICANUS.

Well, folks, here we are. It will take the total eradication of "no-fault" divorce, nay, ANY divorce for ANY reason, and then two generations where the american male can run wild having his way with the hapless and nimcompoopie american woman (unprotected by any laws of any kind except the goodwill of the MEN amongst her own bloodkin), before he comes to his senses and realizes that his MAIN PURPOSE on this earth is to find a good woman, sire children, and serve as HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD.

I've got a pretty closed mind about this - goodnight.

[Dogman]

I was there at the beginning and I saw it happen - I know what the hell I am talking about - no-fault divorce will ruin ANY NATION! Period!

Go back a century, these jew bastards, working with all those millions fleeced from americans by the jewish uppers here (and given carte blanche to Bronstein and Lenin), took advantage of failings in the Romanov's rule to enlist the fight of the proud and great slavic nation to bring down the Romanov dynasty. What is one of the very first unnatural laws Lenin and his crazed killers enacted (and ENFORCED)? NO FAULT DIVORCE.

Get that law translated into English and see how closely worded it is to all the no-fault laws that finally got enacted in the States back in the late 60's, early 70's, starting, of course, with California. The purpose of that law, both in Russia, in the states, and *ANYWHERE* else it is enacted (by jews, of course), is to BREAK THE PROUD SPIRIT of the resourceful caucasian man, who, for centuries, took as his birthright to serve as HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD. There is no better way to break that proud spirit than to serve him up with a no-fault divorce and jail-backed (back-breaking) child support, all the while denying him ANY SAY in the proper upbringing of his own children.

I learned about it in the early 70's here in Texas - an outstanding co-worker came to work one day white as a ghost - he had been met, the evening before, with a deputy sheriff and two policemen, a lawyer, and an eviction notice with divorce papers being served up to him when he had got home from work, all served up on behalf of his wife, with whom he had had another minor (so he thought) spat over some of the habits their teenage daughter was taking on.

He had been a dynamic leader amongst we grunt workers, but, that BROKE HIS SPIRIT.

What had been a tiny, tiny, hardly worth studying for, fraction of the legal profession (divorce proceedings), blossomed into a booming (and I mean B O O M I N G) business.

I predicted then, and I stand by it, that it would take TWO generations of hard-pricked young american males to figure out that they ought not: a) take ANY marriage vows; nor, b) impregnate ANY FEMALUS AMERICANUS.

Well, folks, here we are. It will take the total eradication of "no-fault" divorce, nay, ANY divorce for ANY reason, and then two generations where the american male can run wild having his way with the hapless and nimcompoopie american woman (unprotected by any laws of any kind except the goodwill of the MEN amongst her own bloodkin), before he comes to his senses and realizes that his MAIN PURPOSE on this earth is to find a good woman, sire children, and serve as HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD.

I've got a pretty closed mind about this - goodnight. The one thing I will agree with is no fault divorces are evil for some and great for others, but usually the woman will end up with the lions share and the man paying for years,

Which I do look at the kids never asked to be brought into this world but once here both parents should have a hand one way or another in helping their upbringing until at least 18.

Tho even at that age they are still semi idiots that think they know everything and have it all figured out.

[singular_me]

dogman, when one is aware of the *whole* picture, 50% of men and women alike choosing to remain childless makes sense. But wall street would hate that.

and now as a result we have homosexuals wanting to become parents.



Numbers woman , numbers where did you get them..

Dodge and weave all you want I want numbers to back up your original statement....

[Horn]

Every woman I have ever known wanted kids!

Half only until they've had kids, that doesn't turn out well for the kids.

I'm sure some just want to fulfill a role as respected caregivers/contributors within their communities and try while failing with children.

If not having children, judged by the community (or more so by other women) as not deserving respect as "just a woman" not a mother also.

Same goes for men, but not as much so.

[Hitch]

They've been brainwashed that they deserve it ALL.

You will never hear a good response from a woman, from my post.

The only explanation, is that women don't want men to be happy.

Women have is SOO easy, it's honestly that simple, to keep a man happy and content.

If it were that easy to keep women happy.....that's the question.

[Dogman]

Half only until they've had kids, that doesn't turn out well for the kids.

I imagine some want to fulfill a role as respected caregivers/contributors within their communities and try while failing with children.

If not having children, judged by the community (or more so by other women) as not deserving respect as just a woman not a mother also. Sudden life changes do that...

Especially ones that can live longer than you and carry your name or genes.

[Dogman]

You will never hear a good response from a woman, from my post.

The only explanation, is that women don't want men to be happy.

Women have is SOO easy, it's honestly that simple, to keep a man happy and content.

If it were that easy to keep women happy.....that's the question. But my friend you are thinking on the mans point of view, a woman is the one that carry s the kid , pushes them out has the hormone mind blend with them and mostly most will love them above the man from the time she gives birth.

Men are simple, women are beyond understanding by men but perfectly understandable by another woman.

At least I have or think I have finally figured out my friend..

Now one answer to your op..

Is that kids today have seen divorces of their parents or their friends parents, plus do understand that the laws are against them,

No matter how well they do and try to make things right.

Men and woman get into ruts and some look for greener pastures, and do not want to make the effort to meet half way in the road.

Mostly when trust is lost the marriage is lost. And kids see this.

Only a few that I know have had long marriages, most are working on their 2-6th one I know the state will not issue a license so they went common law.

Young kids (adults) are not stupid, and I think they totally understand the pitfalls.

Best guess and my last one on this thread, dam good question raised tho.

[Horn]

If the woman is not happy, the man will be made not, to be.

This is of course how it should be.

Keeps men creative.

[Dogman]

If the woman is not happy, the man will be made not, to be.

This is of course how it should be.

Keeps men creative.Mama is not happy, no one is happy and the husband is on the whipping end..

Agree..

Remember she controls the pussy...

Or as some Asians would say..

The Golden Gates !

;D

[Hitch]

Remember she controls the pussy...

Or as some Asians would say..

The Golden Gates !

;D

Again, why women are responsible for the failing of marriage.

Sex is a basic need for men. It's biological, you can't fight it, it's how men are. When women use that for control reasons, bad things happen.

[Dogman]

Again, why women are responsible for the failing of marriage.

Sex is a basic need for men. It's biological, you can't fight it, it's how men are. When women use that for control reasons, bad things happen.

It works both ways!

Out of this thread

No good defense that can answer to the question

Sent from my Nexus 7

[Shami-Amourae]

http://s27.postimg.org/e7gwbcs7n/1443984173003.png

(http://anonym.to?http://anonym.to/?http://postimage.org/)http://s27.postimg.org/gwbp1dxoz/1439862251791.png (http://anonym.to?http://anonym.to/?http://postimage.org/)
(http://anonym.to?http://anonym.to/?http://postimage.org/)

[vacuum]

Marriage needs society to back it up for it to work. The problem is that when a woman can get rid of the man at will, and force him to still provide for her, she has no incentive to keep him around. In fact, it is to her benefit to get rid of the man because she will get half his stuff, child support, plus she is free to find another man. This is economics.

Furthermore, men and women are programmed to seek other partners after a while. Women are hypergamic meaning they are never satisfied and would always prefer a higher status man. Men are programmed to continually seek new novel partners regardless of the attractiveness or other qualities of the current partner.

Therefore, both economically and biologically, marriages today are set up to fail. It doesn't even matter what intentions you have going in, these forces are stronger than the average individual. For men, the only logical choice is to not get involved at all, because he loses control of his own destiny regardless of any action he may take after marriage. Low value and low income men many not have anything to lose, but those men will likely not be able to get married because women's hypergamic nature. High value men on the other hand are getting more and more wise to putting themselves in that position.

[Dogman]

Marriage needs society to back it up for it to work. The problem is that when a woman can get rid of the man at will, and force him to still provide for her, she has no incentive to keep him around. In fact, it is to her benefit to get rid of the man because she will get half his stuff, child support, plus she is free to find another man. This is economics.

Furthermore, men and women are programmed to seek other partners after a while. Women are hypergamic meaning they are never satisfied and would always prefer a higher status man. Men are programmed to continually seek new novel partners regardless of the attractiveness or other qualities of the current partner.

Therefore, both economically and biologically, marriages today are set up to fail. It doesn't even matter what intentions you have going in, these forces are stronger than the average individual. For men, the only logical choice is to not get involved at all, because he loses control of his own destiny regardless of any action he may take after marriage. Low value and low income men many not have anything to lose, but those men will likely not be able to get married because women's hypergamic nature. High value men on the other hand are getting more and more wise to putting themselves in that position.

Well said!

But please don't totally blame the women,

Men share the blame also percentage wise!

Sent from my Nexus 7

[Shami-Amourae]

Marriage needs society to back it up for it to work. The problem is that when a woman can get rid of the man at will, and force him to still provide for her, she has no incentive to keep him around. In fact, it is to her benefit to get rid of the man because she will get half his stuff, child support, plus she is free to find another man. This is economics.

Furthermore, men and women are programmed to seek other partners after a while. Women are hypergamic meaning they are never satisfied and would always prefer a higher status man. Men are programmed to continually seek new novel partners regardless of the attractiveness or other qualities of the current partner.

Therefore, both economically and biologically, marriages today are set up to fail. It doesn't even matter what intentions you have going in, these forces are stronger than the average individual. For men, the only logical choice is to not get involved at all, because he loses control of his own destiny regardless of any action he may take after marriage. Low value and low income men many not have anything to lose, but those men will likely not be able to get married because women's hypergamic nature. High value men on the other hand are getting more and more wise to putting themselves in that position.

B-b-but Muh Bible!

[Hitch]

It works both ways!

No, it doesn't.

It's unfortunate, but the best thing a woman can offer a man is sexual release. Today. Today, that is.

In the past, it wasn't that way. Women brought nurturing, caring, home building, child raising, so many skills and talents that men would never, ever, be able to attain.

The toughest job out there, was to stay at home and raise a bunch of kids, and manage a household.

Nobody wants that job anymore. They'd rather sit in an office and stare at a computer.

[vacuum]

Well said!

But please don't totally blame the women,

Men share the blame also percentage wise!

Sent from my Nexus 7

Weak men, of course, are the ones who allowed society to become this way. So they are more to blame than anyone. But of course those men probably had insufficient parental care, so I don't really know who is at fault.

[Dogman]

B-b-but Muh Bible!

Ever been married?

To a woman!

I think not!

Go back to designing giants dicks!

Sent from my Nexus 7

[Dogman]

No, it doesn't.

It's unfortunate, but the best thing a woman can offer a man is sexual release. Today. Today, that is.

In the past, it wasn't that way. Women brought nurturing, caring, home building, child raising, so many skills and talents that men would never, ever, be able to attain.

The toughest job out there, was to stay at home and raise a bunch of kids, and manage a household.

Nobody wants that job anymore. They'd rather sit in an office and stare at a computer.




Weak men, of course, are the ones who allowed society to become this way. So they are more to blame than anyone. But of course those men probably had insufficient parental care, so I don't really know who is at fault.

You may be right,!

I am old school and will be till my death!

Married late in life to the most evil woman on the fucking planet so I can not help being biased, but do know a bunch of now 40 + year marriages that I knew both sides when they were single!

Plus more that are into 5 + marriages!

Tho still hold onto hope!

Guess not!

Sent from my Nexus 7

[singular_me]

thanks horn for saying that.

It amazes me that some people on here can immediately see economic issues and all the manipulations that support them, yet do not extend it to the so called family values, which are overrated just like sex.... it is my understanding that up to 70% are deeply unhappy with their sex lives and family situation, but thats the social agenda and it has been like this for centuries, sexual liberation is a myth too.

the more one understands the Purpose of Life, the more people find their passion and have the courage to live up their dreams... and kids wouldnt come as a first objective.

Mother Nature did NOT make us animals (reproduce, hunt money and die) but it is our choice to remain animals or not.

One just have to observe kids once they are full grown adults dealing with their parents, to see the regrets and bitterness binding them because of failed projections on each end. Most people make kids in the highs of passion but passion is always a double edged sword and most of the time people are setting themselves up for a rude awakening.



Half only until they've had kids, that doesn't turn out well for the kids.

I'm sure some just want to fulfill a role as respected caregivers/contributors within their communities and try while failing with children.

If not having children, judged by the community (or more so by other women) as not deserving respect as "just a woman" not a mother also.

Same goes for men, but not as much so.

[singular_me]

longevity of a relationship doesnt mean anything... one has to look at the happiness factor. That is the downside of the old days.

Nowadays the economics of sex has taken over feelings almost completely (it went from bad to worse). Instead of blaming each others, men and women should question the model instead.

Norms = myths. what works well for a minority cannot be coerced on a majority because Free Will is the paramount to achieve. The NWO knows this.


You may be right,!

I am old school and will be till my death!

Married late in life to the most evil woman on the fucking planet so I can not help being biased, but do know a bunch of now 40 + year marriages that I knew both sides when they were single!

Plus more that are into 5 + marriages!

Tho still hold onto hope!

Guess not!

Sent from my Nexus 7

[SWRichmond]

We need to be honest and truthful. The failings of marriage, as an institution, is really all women's fault.

Men are easy to keep happy. All we need is no drama, lot's of sex, and maybe a good meal. That's it. The rest, we will take care of. Just stay out of our way and let us do what we need to do.

How women can't figure that out, astounds me.

I think many HAVE figured it out, and when they want half of your stuff without you being around anymore, that is how they get rid of you.

[Hitch]

I think many HAVE figured it out, and when they want half of your stuff without you being around anymore, that is how they get rid of you.

True, like the saying, we lock our car doors to keep honest people honest. Leave the car door open, with money on the seat, and it might be too tempting to an otherwise honest person.

Marriage is like leaving your car door open and half your stuff on the seat. Staying single, keeps honest women honest.

[EE_]

This ugly bitch should have been shot dead where she stood!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUBnxqEVKlk

If you guys want to blame someone, blame the ugly liberal feminists and 'woman's Lib'...they got the ball of death rolling downhill.
The first dose of 'equality' they should have been given, should have been to sterilize them and sent their ugly wide asses into Vietnam!
Then they could have come home to work on construction sites and other dangerous jobs like their male equal's.

[Horn]

For men, the only logical choice is to not get involved at all, because he loses control of his own destiny regardless of any action he may take after marriage. Low value and low income men many not have anything to lose, but those men will likely not be able to get married because women's hypergamic nature. High value men on the other hand are getting more and more wise to putting themselves in that position.

I don't think many get married too suddenly anymore, those that do are most religious and have support systems setup to reinforce. Most often marriages come these days by way of judgement from outside of the relationship, and they take a long long time to materialize.

Sure there's still the young 20 something kids that rush in, but those are far and few between. Most often its due to a pregnancy, and marriage or some kind of civil is a requirement.

Marriage is beneficial to me, that's all I know. Sharing my stuff is beneficial to me, the stuff is useless if it can't be shared to me.

Guess I'm just a green eggs and ham kinda guy?

[singular_me]

taking one's time to get into marriage/commitment is how it should be and people shouldnt think that any model can resolve issues. It is all by the case... because marriage has been/is such an institution, now even gays can get the state approval to marry.

Divorce lawyers are patting themselves on the back. You want the gov to regulate marriage/any norm, that is what you get.



I don't think many get married too suddenly anymore, those that do are most religious and have support systems setup to reinforce. Most often marriages come these days by way of judgement from outside of the relationship, and they take a long long time to materialize.

Sure there's still the young 20 something kids that rush in, but those are far and few between. Most often its due to a pregnancy, and marriage or some kind of civil is a requirement.

Marriage is beneficial to me, that's all I know. Sharing my stuff is beneficial to me, the stuff is useless if it can't be shared to me.

Guess I'm just a green eggs and ham kinda guy?

[EE_]

This is what the loss of normal heterosexual relationships has brought society


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPNqaOwj7ko

30 faggots respond to the word 'faggot'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecUdWGCcd74

[Horn]

I think many here on forum could be upset cause they are PM hoarders and never took the time to teach their significant others the true meaning and value.

She just sees you packin away stuff like a rat for yourself then leaves you, lol!

You have to show her why you're the King :)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnPMoAb4y8U

[madfranks]

Marriage is like leaving your car door open and half your stuff on the seat. Staying single, keeps honest women honest.

I would clarify that marriage, with no-fault divorce, is like leaving the car door open. Back when divorce would only be awarded under proof of fault, such temptations didn't exist.

[singular_me]

regulate relationships between consenting adults is ludicrous... divorce laws coerce women into taking advantage of the situation and encourage separations

back in the old days, the dowry was plunging many women into despair... traded like goods, under the guise to consolidate wealth between families, genealogy. Dowry has been institutionalized for centuries and almost in every country. Most upper and middle classes women married without being in love. Let alone the poor class.

The dowry today in india prompt many women to abort as soon as they know the fetus is female. Some, if not many, will go deep into debt.

what to think of the 1 child policy in china?

No matter how we look at it, the family value system is fvcked up, has always been, not just in the west but everywhere. Because people have so little free will. This is the real cause of social dysfunctions and no man's law can fix this mess.

[Jerrylynnb]

It hasn't always been so fucked up. At least, not by the family stories I heard growing up. It wasn't until NO-FAULT that things nose-dived.

Before that, for SEVERAL GENERATIONS, white folks lived and died pretty much
as their ancestors and the children carried forward. Marriages were FOR LIFE, as divorce was considered a tragedy - divorcees were to be pitied.

I come from very large families on BOTH sides, and, I got to hear, from my own grandparents, stores about THEIR grandparents and uncles and aunts - our culture was steady and self-perpetuating.

It wasn't until the enactment of no-fault divorce, that the underpinnings were kicked out from beneath the foundation, and, by now, most adults got no idea how stable life in the white man's world used to be.

Since this idea (no-fault divorce) got introduced first in 1920 by Lenin and his soviet jews (financed by rich american jews), I assume it was planned that way.

It is not just a natural evolution of marraige - no fault is DESIGNED by evil and malicious planners to have the very effect it has had - destroy the fabric of white man's culture. Such that, by now, younger pundits, even on this board, aren't sure that no-fault is a bad idea - they got no memory of how stable family life used to be - my four grandparents were married to each other for over 40 years - I could see with my own eyes, growing up, that they loved each other deeply. And that was after all the years where they fussed and fought as young couples (I heard them stories also).

It was our clever jews who brought their influence to bear so that divorce went from being akin to leprosy, to where now perfectly intelligent white men around here aren't so sure that maybe it is an OK idea, after all.

We're doomed until we come to our senses - 'till death do us part' aren't just fancy poetic words - they MEAN what they say! Damnit!

[singular_me]

I am evaluating the male-female relationships over last 1000 years (worldwide) and beyond

while you are just focusing on the last 4 or 5 generations within a specific group

Big difference.


The norm is a myth and the NWO knows this, hence will destabilize any old structures very easily. And for them it is a cake walk because they know when the tide is coming in and out, the movement of the pendulum... and therefore are always ahead of the game... so the 3 or 4 generations which seemed to have "it" was just the tide coming in.

we want power to rule our life, that is what we get.


My grand parents on my mother side were relatively steady too, 50 years of marriage... but that doesnt mean anything. My parents, although having the same steady values, didnt get along and we all left home when reaching 18y or age.

staying together for the kids is as bad as a divorce, if not worse.



It hasn't always been so fucked up. At least, not by the family stories I heard growing up. It wasn't until NO-FAULT that things nose-dived.

Before that, for SEVERAL GENERATIONS, white folks lived and died pretty much
as their ancestors and the children carried forward. Marriages were FOR LIFE, as divorce was considered a tragedy - divorcees were to be pitied.

I come from very large families on BOTH sides, and, I got to hear, from my own grandparents, stores about THEIR grandparents and uncles and aunts - our culture was steady and self-perpetuating.

It wasn't until the enactment of no-fault divorce, that the underpinnings were kicked out from beneath the foundation, and, by now, most adults got no idea how stable life in the white man's world used to be.

Since this idea (no-fault divorce) got introduced first in 1920 by Lenin and his soviet jews (financed by rich american jews), I assume it was planned that way.

It is not just a natural evolution of marraige - no fault is DESIGNED by evil and malicious planners to have the very effect it has had - destroy the fabric of white man's culture. Such that, by now, younger pundits, even on this board, aren't sure that no-fault is a bad idea - they got no memory of how stable family life used to be - my four grandparents were married to each other for over 40 years - I could see with my own eyes, growing up, that they loved each other deeply. And that was after all the years where they fussed and fought as young couples (I heard them stories also).

It was our clever jews who brought their influence to bear so that divorce went from being akin to leprosy, to where now perfectly intelligent white men around here aren't so sure that maybe it is an OK idea, after all.

We're doomed until we come to our senses - 'till death do us part' aren't just fancy poetic words - they MEAN what they say! Damnit!

[ximmy]

http://i.imgur.com/RymBLk2.gif


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8w_wlSRGeJs

[hoarder]

Social engineering makes sure women get the most in exchange for sex. They outlawed prostitution and and made normal women into whores.

A couple of my ex-girlfriends were members of "Women's Groups". I didn't think much of it back then, thought it was just women getting together spontaneously enjoying each others company. I figured out later what those groups were and who ran them. The idea is to fill White women with delusions of grandeur, rendering them impossible to satisfy or marry, also suggesting the benefits of relationships with non-White men.

One of my ex-girlfriends said "The three most important things to a man in a relationship is sex, sex and sex." Yes, she was right, we're shallow that way.

So as young men we paid for sex, not directly, but we paid dearly. It was worth it as long as we had sex. We agreed with their idiotic opinions, went along with all kinds of bad ideas, charmed them and told them what they wanted to hear....or we did not get laid.

Then we got older and sex got too expensive, especially to have sex with old women. Now old age is the only thing that gets women out of being whores. No man wants them enough to forfeit all his assets.

An older woman who has led a charmed life will have a miserable time coping with the real world.

[singular_me]

interesting and why prostitution exists in the first place?

here we go into circular thinking mode, chicken-egg dilemma.

outlawed or not, prostitution has always been around... the whole society is venal and superficial to the point that making friends is more and more difficult... and sex trafficking and porn are booming like never before.

it is going to get worse before it gets better. Sex cannot be monetized and is not tradable as it is the most powerful force in the entire universe. And money stands in the way... so venality is here to stay. Nothing is going to change but get worse until people realize that there is another world outside their own bubbles.

[Hitch]

interesting and why prostitution exists in the first place?

Because...women use sex as a tool to gain value and what they want, regardless, thus creating a market where men can just purchase it directly?

Just a thought.

Don't blame men for the worlds "oldest" profession. :rolleyes:

[singular_me]

it is a chicken egg dilemma... 50-50
many men cannot help themselves when they cant have sex at least 2-3 times a week... women arent like that, so, yes, sure... why not trade sex :D

more seriously... sexuality and money are a deadly mix and I wonder how much closer to the abyss we need to stand before making a Uturn.



Because...women use sex as a tool to gain value and what they want, regardless, thus creating a market where men can just purchase it directly?

Just a thought.

Don't blame men for the worlds "oldest" profession. :rolleyes:

[Hitch]

it is a chicken egg dilemma... 50-50
many men cannot help themselves when they cant have sex at least 2-3 times a week... women arent like that, so, yes, sure... why not trade sex :D

It's already been pointed out how easy it is to make men happy. I figure, the sex trade industry is mostly the fault of women. If more women actually cared to take care of their men, instead of taking selfies and posting them to all their friends (thanks for that post ximmy), or looking out for their completely complex inflated self egos, maybe there would be a better balance between the sexes.

But, what do I know. Society says women are victims and should be rewarded financially whenever possible. I'll try and stay single, and free of all that drama best I can.

[Jerrylynnb]

Well, Singular_me, I wondered about that myself, and, so, when I retired I read some books and studied and I got my own ideas about how and why white man's marraige (the institution) fell under assault.

It is true (if you check), Lenin and Bronstein set up no-fault first thing after their bolshevicki revolution - why? Because they needed to break the proud back of the great slavic men of Russia - if you got other ideas, lets hear them.

How on earth else could anyone think that no-fault divorce in 1920 Russia could do any good for anybody? But it WOULD start putting a lot of resourceful Russian men down - after all, who amongst us, no matter how much of a man we fancy ourselves, can stand up to the law comin' for us for some nonsensical bullshit like no-fault divorce?

So, then, since it worked so damn well in Russia, naturally these i'national jews went to work on how to get that kind of nation-wrecking crap over here where the real prize was - the good ole' USA. These jews had Hollywood, and, I suspect they used their influence, where they could get away with it, to plant seeds (of poison, of course) in the minds of the movie-going public. Check out the 1938 classic "Commrade X", starring Clark Gable and Hedy Lamaar" - these jews stuck in a line, having absolutely NOTHING to do with the continuity of the movie's story, to get americans to start thinking about divorce as not necessarily being such an all-damned-to-hell bad thing. They have her say the line, "...when marriage is over...", thus avoiding even mentioning the word DIVORCE, but, making the viewer *think* divorce anyway.

Of course, they realized they needed all these dufuss american boys (the generation before me, my many uncles) to go beat up on Uncle Adolph, so, they lightened up until that was all done and over with. But then they figured a way to nudge us even more steadily in that direction, and you can see that if you bother checking out that 1957 classic, "The Rainmaker", starring Burt Lancaster, Wendell Cory, and Kathryn Hepburn. They got the audience to see that being divorced, while it *used* to be shameful, was maybe not so shameful after all, and, by golly, it might not even matter in the end.

Just my analysis as to how these damnable jews use their options in the popular movies to plant ideas that promote their agenda. In the early 1960's, their was a comedy from Italy titled, "Divorce, Italian Style", where Marcelo Marcianno had to kill (dark humor there) his own wife to get a divorce so he could marry his teeny bopper heart throb. It was a funny movie, but it was not targeted at the american audience. However, within a year or two, they DID finally fling open the door with "Divorce American Style", starring Dick Van Dyke, Debbie Reynolds, and Jason Robards. Yessir, they dunked it all out on the floor for all to see with that one, trying to introduce it to us as a comedy.

I just can't accept that we americans, we white men, would EVER in a thousand years even give the idea of a "no-fault" divorce so much as a nightmare's thought, had it not been for the intentional, and mean-spirited, brain-washing by these international jews who were hell bent on weakening the american man, AFTER we did their dirty work for them over there in Germany.

It looks like they succeeded here, as we are not all sure about it anymore - some of the comments suggest that maybe no-fault ain't such a bad idea, in *some* cases, maybe, even. See how they can poison our minds?

When the white man comes to his senses about it, WAKES THE FUCK UP (over this no-fault bullshit), and realizes what a number they did to our minds (dammit!), I wonder about the backlash - I am thinking about Rudyard Kipling's "The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon" (AKA "When the Saxon Learns to Hate").

I think I'm just too damned old.

[monty]

Jerrylynnb, "Just my analysis as to how these damnable jews use their options in the popular movies to plant ideas that promote their agenda. In the early 1960's, their was a comedy from Italy titled, "Divorce, Italian Style", where Marcelo Marcianno had to kill (dark humor there) his own wife to get a divorce so he could marry his teeny bopper heart throb. It was a funny movie, but it was not targeted at the american audience. However, within a year or two, they DID finally fling open the door with "Divorce American Style", starring Dick Van Dyke, Debbie Reynolds, and Jason Robards. Yessir, they dunked it all out on the floor for all to see with that one, trying to introduce it to us as a comedy."

Having lived through and witnessed all that you wrote about in your post I must say your analysis on no fault divorce 100% spot on. \uu\

[Jewboo]

Until the pill, household rape was pretty common, unless the man could find a prostitute or had a mistress.



https://vintage45.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/father-knows-best-cast.jpg


Common Rapist

http://versioned.nameberry.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/tv-ozzie.jpg
Common Rapist


http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2014/news/140224/ralph-waite-2-600.jpg
Common Rapist


:rolleyes: according to Goldissima

[Horn]

many men cannot help themselves when they cant have sex at least 2-3 times a week... women arent like that, so, yes, sure...

I'm fine with once a week, just so long as the session lasts 48hours.

[Jewboo]

...after their bolshevicki revolution.....then, since it worked so damn well in Russia, naturally these i'national jews went to work on how to get that kind of nation-wrecking crap over here where the real prize was - the good ole' USA...When the white man comes to his senses about it...Rudyard Kipling's "The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon"...I think I'm just too damned old.



http://www.theworldoftruth.net/5_Bilderberg/SOS/TheRothschildHorrorPictureshow/Eng/Pics/1-10PicsSOS/SOS9Betrayed-Dateien/BolshevikSlaughter.jpg


Kipling's poem is a quaint notion but it ain't gonna happen. Just look at the cucked European white men now allowing droves of young muslim rapists into their towns and villages. It's already a done deal. Ditto here in the USA with millions of illegal mexicans and welfare niggers running loose attacking Whitey with impunity.



http://media.trb.com/media/photo/2010-12/58451434.jpg



Bolshevik Jews now own our entire system and they are systematically exterminating Whitey in broad daylight.

[singular_me]

your interpretation is a little bit too materialistic for me but I understand it.

one thing I will agree on is social engineering: since freud, relationships as a whole have taken another major hit... but freud and his followers set the tone to reinforce this notion that man can be contained when his emotions are controlled. The Century of The Self is a major 5H documentary (available on youtube) and explains the "big" picture and which I use as a framework to elaborate further. I have little interest in the consequences such as the no-fault divorce. I like to work from the root up.

Long story short this very freudian trend has also influenced the language and perception of many westerners as it has induced a pervasive social darwinism manifested by a highly detrimental level of narcissism and meritocracy (entitlement). This is exactly why shrinks have booming practices, the human psyche is sick as a whole.

We cannot fight this with the 'same thinking' that created it... and the evidence is that it is not working anyway

Psychoanalysis is a grand deception and if we really want to change what is, that's where we have to start. Back to square one...


Well, Singular_me, I wondered about that myself, and, so, when I retired I read some books and studied and I got my own ideas about how and why white man's marraige (the institution) fell under assault.

It is true (if you check), Lenin and Bronstein set up no-fault first thing after their bolshevicki revolution - why? Because they needed to break the proud back of the great slavic men of Russia - if you got other ideas, lets hear them.

How on earth else could anyone think that no-fault divorce in 1920 Russia could do any good for anybody? But it WOULD start putting a lot of resourceful Russian men down - after all, who amongst us, no matter how much of a man we fancy ourselves, can stand up to the law comin' for us for some nonsensical bullshit like no-fault divorce?

So, then, since it worked so damn well in Russia, naturally these i'national jews went to work on how to get that kind of nation-wrecking crap over here where the real prize was - the good ole' USA. These jews had Hollywood, and, I suspect they used their influence, where they could get away with it, to plant seeds (of poison, of course) in the minds of the movie-going public. Check out the 1938 classic "Commrade X", starring Clark Gable and Hedy Lamaar" - these jews stuck in a line, having absolutely NOTHING to do with the continuity of the movie's story, to get americans to start thinking about divorce as not necessarily being such an all-damned-to-hell bad thing. They have her say the line, "...when marriage is over...", thus avoiding even mentioning the word DIVORCE, but, making the viewer *think* divorce anyway.

Of course, they realized they needed all these dufuss american boys (the generation before me, my many uncles) to go beat up on Uncle Adolph, so, they lightened up until that was all done and over with. But then they figured a way to nudge us even more steadily in that direction, and you can see that if you bother checking out that 1957 classic, "The Rainmaker", starring Burt Lancaster, Wendell Cory, and Kathryn Hepburn. They got the audience to see that being divorced, while it *used* to be shameful, was maybe not so shameful after all, and, by golly, it might not even matter in the end.

Just my analysis as to how these damnable jews use their options in the popular movies to plant ideas that promote their agenda. In the early 1960's, their was a comedy from Italy titled, "Divorce, Italian Style", where Marcelo Marcianno had to kill (dark humor there) his own wife to get a divorce so he could marry his teeny bopper heart throb. It was a funny movie, but it was not targeted at the american audience. However, within a year or two, they DID finally fling open the door with "Divorce American Style", starring Dick Van Dyke, Debbie Reynolds, and Jason Robards. Yessir, they dunked it all out on the floor for all to see with that one, trying to introduce it to us as a comedy.

I just can't accept that we americans, we white men, would EVER in a thousand years even give the idea of a "no-fault" divorce so much as a nightmare's thought, had it not been for the intentional, and mean-spirited, brain-washing by these international jews who were hell bent on weakening the american man, AFTER we did their dirty work for them over there in Germany.

It looks like they succeeded here, as we are not all sure about it anymore - some of the comments suggest that maybe no-fault ain't such a bad idea, in *some* cases, maybe, even. See how they can poison our minds?

When the white man comes to his senses about it, WAKES THE FUCK UP (over this no-fault bullshit), and realizes what a number they did to our minds (dammit!), I wonder about the backlash - I am thinking about Rudyard Kipling's "The Wrath of the Awakened Saxon" (AKA "When the Saxon Learns to Hate").

I think I'm just too damned old.

[PatColo]

sorry I didn't watch the OP video, and only read about 1/2 the replies; but just to add, I believe the western joodeo-masonic "family court" systems set out, prolly starting circa ~1980, a deliberate cult-marxist campaign to "destroy men" via divorce settlements... de-balling men financially and alienating them from woman-kind, plus breaking up families & leaving any children from the marriage rudderless in their social development.

I don't have hard stats, only some anecdotals from podcasts & such, but my impression is that post-divorce men are much more likely to commit suicide, based in large part on their hopelessness for ever having a future under their impossible divorce settlements.

Separately, I just listened to this podcast hosted by a waycist and often annoying (shout-speak rants rife with gratuitous cussing!) Aussi dude, I think 40ish years old.
Two's Company, Three's Allowed (10-29-15) (http://www.renegadebroadcasting.com/twos-company-threes-allowed-10-29-15/)I don't believe he was every married but he does have a couple kids. He was complaining about AU women as sluts, and he chooses not to be in any relationship until his kids are 18+, when he plans to relocate to USA. Said reason was he's met a small handful of women who've matched his own "old fashioned values", but they've all been American.

Go figure eh? Shows that 1) feminazi/slut-ization of women is also a (perceived) issue in AU, and 2) "the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence!" :o

[singular_me]

here some interesting podcasts, which may give the beginning of an answer. The surest way to destabilize a society is either by implementing debauchery/promiscuity as norms or/and of course financial bankruptcy/wars. This has been known since ever however. That is what took down the ancient roman empire.

Sex and money are two sides of the same coin, the most powerful tools for mind control, and it is impossible to fight this mind control without the understanding of how electromagmetism influences psyches. Inner balance demands the comprehension of physics 101... any other explanations remains either weak or incomplete because there are mere subjective whereas math is objective

ps: both mention the Frankfurt School of philosophy.... psychoanalysis has also subverted philosophy.

-------------------------------------------------------------
Sexual Utopia in Power," which is based on a number of different essays he has written throughout the years. Roger begins by laying out some of the utopian ideas that were propagated by magazines like Playboy and Cosmopolitan and became the backdrop for the sexual revolution of the 1960s. We look back to the roaring 20s, when divorce became fashionable and traditional viewpoints on morals and marriage were slowly beginning to shift. Roger explains how the selling of women as a utopian vision of sexuality was done for money by some and as a conscious effort to undermine American society by other revolutionaries coming out of the Frankfurt school. http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/07/RIR-150710.php


His philosophy thesis, "Ethical Sex: Sexual Choices and their Nature and Meaning - Perspectives from Natural Law and Marriage " is being prepared for publication as a book. Anthony is with us to help make some sense of the extreme views on sex and marriage that are currently permeating academia, the mainstream media, and politics. In the first segment, we take some time to consider the traditional form of sex in relation to love and lifelong commitments aimed at procreating for future successful generations. Anthony links the political motives of the Frankfurt School of philosophy and social theory to the transformation of sexual views and destabilization of family values we are seeing today. http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2015/07/RIR-150713.php

[mick silver]

thanks Jerrylynnb , never to young are old to learn some thing

[Tumbleweed]

I came across a video a few days ago that pretty well covers the whole miserable mess that we find our selves in. The destruction of this nation, family, morals, marriages race mixing, white genocide and everything else that's wrong. They don't say Jew but they do tell how they're destroying this country and have been for a long time now and they've had a lot of success so far.

It's over an hour long and most here know what's going on but this lays it out well. I think it would be good for those who don't know what's happening to this country to watch this and if they see the bigger picture they might then be more receptive when it's pointed out to them that it's the Jews that are doing it to us.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs

[Shami-Amourae]

I came across a video a few days ago that pretty well covers the whole miserable mess that we find our selves in. The destruction of this nation, family, morals, marriages race mixing, white genocide and everything else that's wrong. They don't say Jew but they do tell how they're destroying this country and have been for a long time now and they've had a lot of success so far.


The only thing I see fixing this is a complete or partial collapse of civilization.

It's said people revolt when 40% of their income goes to food. People rebel when they are literally hungry. Until then the population will follow the status quo off the cliff.

I think the best thing to for myself is to focus on how to insulate myself, become self sufficient, and keep costs to a minimum with having a paid off house, gardening for veggies/fruit, and raising livestock/hunting/fishing for meat.

[Tumbleweed]

The only thing I see fixing this is a complete or partial collapse of civilization.

It's said people revolt when 40% of their income goes to food. People rebel when they are literally hungry. Until then the population will follow the status quo off the cliff.

I think the best thing to for myself is to focus on how to insulate myself, become self sufficient, and keep costs to a minimum with having a paid off house, gardening for veggies/fruit, and raising livestock/hunting/fishing for meat.

I think the main point of the video I posted is that the white middle class christian family is the foundation of this country and the Jews had to destroy them to destroy this nation and enslave us. What's needed is for this country to return to the christian values that made it a good place to begin with. It's well laid out in this video how the Jews have been destroying this nation. What they've done needs to be reversed. Hitler did it in Germany and Queen Isabella did it in Spain. You have to know the enemy, what they're doing and how they're doing it to fight them.

[Shami-Amourae]

I think the main point of the video I posted is that the white middle class christian family is the foundation of this country and the Jews had to destroy them to destroy this nation and enslave us. What's needed is for this country to return to the christian values that made it a good place to begin with. It's well laid out in this video how the Jews have been destroying this nation. What they've done needs to be reversed. Hitler did it in Germany and Queen Isabella did it in Spain. You have to know the enemy, what they're doing and how they're doing it to fight them.

Yeah but who are the biggest allies AND enemies of the Jews. The Christians.

The Jews seek to destroy the Christians.

The Christians seek to give all their wealth, resources, and intelligence to Jews.

It's completely insane. You can't have a Christian rival when the problem is Christianity itself. In other words the religion itself is what's pushing for the destruction of civilization. Look at all the idiot Christian Cuckservatives who run off to Africa and feed Dindus, and adopt Dindu kids so they can say "I'm not really racist!"



Here's the thing. The Jew is getting all of this power from cucked Christians. Once they wipe out the cucked Christian, all they will have left are enemies, and they will quickly lose power without their cucks bending over and taking it up the rump for them.

The new radical Left the Jew is importing into the West hates the Jew, and demands GibsMeDat from Whitey.


Most likely scenario if things continue as they are:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niicDbbSky0


I think something needs to replace religion so White people have a spine. Religion will die with the increase of technology, automation, and transhumanism. The best replacement in my opinion is 4chan/8chan POL internet culture. Basically anti-Cultural Marxism. I call it Cultural Fascism personally. Cultural Marxism is the current religion of the Left. We need an atheistic political religion like that for the Right. Call it Neo-Reactionary, Alt-Right, whatever. It's being developed on /pol/ already.

Jesus pre-/pol/
http://www.bizpacreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/jesus2.jpg

Jesus post-/pol/
https://cdn.scratch.mit.edu/static/site/projects/thumbnails/6737/7304.png



Christianity is dead. I think it's not worth saving. Christianity was created as a slave religion by Jews so they'd love licking the boots of their Jew masters. It did change to go against Jewry over time, but I think it's better we just copy what the Left did with Cultural Marxism, but just flip it.

[Tumbleweed]

Shami the church was infiltrated by Jews just as it was in Queen Isabellas time. The Jews had to be identified and thrown out. Some got their heads cut off. Christianity isn't the problem it's Jews infiltrating it and taking control. I don't have time to post more right now on this but I will later.

[Tumbleweed]

I think something needs to replace religion so White people have a spine. Religion will die with the increase of technology, automation, and transhumanism. The best replacement in my opinion is 4chan/8chan POL internet culture. Basically anti-Cultural Marxism. I call it Cultural Fascism personally. Cultural Marxism is the current religion of the Left. We need an atheistic political religion like that for the Right. Call it Neo-Reactionary, Alt-Right, whatever. It's being developed on /pol/ already.




Christianity is dead. I think it's not worth saving. Christianity was created as a slave religion by Jews so they'd love licking the boots of their Jew masters. It did change to go against Jewry over time, but I think it's better we just copy what the Left did with Cultural Marxism, but just flip it.

I think christianity will do just fine if people understand that the Jews have infiltrated it to destroy it and work to undo what the Jews have done. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are on our side. It's a mistake to turn against christianity. Jesus spoke out against the Jews and we need to know it and point that out to the christians that have been brain washed by them. Below is an article that should be helpful in doing that and there are others too that I will post.

http://www.fathersmanifesto.net/forgivethemnot.htm



Forgive them not for they know what they do
Any Greek textus receptus will prove to you beyond the shadow of any doubt that Luke 23:34 SHOULD have been translated as "father_forgive_them_not_for_they-know_what_they-do" rather than "forgive them for they know not what they do". There's no feasible reason why "not" needs to be associated with "know" versus "forgive_them".


Furthermore, as all Christians and jews know, and as Christ Himself taught, and as the Old Testament testifies, forgiveness is based upon repentence, but did these jews ever repent of their sins? Never. So why would the suggestion be made that Christ COULD even TRY to ask God to forgive them? And if Christ DID ask God to forgive them, God must have been sound asleep, because He was still inclined to destroy all of them and the Temple of Jerusalem in 72 AD, not much of an indication that HE was inclined to forgive them Himself. As the son of God, God in the flesh, son of man, king of kings, messiah, Israelite with the courage to send His Twelve Disciples only to the house of Israel, and about the only Christian in 2,000 years willing to take on the jews head on, changing the word structure of this single sentence changed His entire mission statement and made Him appear as a confused little boy.


The jews must be having quite a laugh in the backrooms of their Synagogues, but not for long. What they've done here is beyond forgiveness.
Christ spent His entire ministry preaching against, condemning, and insulting in the most ingenious way, the jews who had polluted the command of God with their traditions of the elders "Jesus replied, "And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? Matthew 15:3". He and His disciples called the jews every name in the book, including "you brood of vipers", they will be "thrown into the fire", "hypocrites!", "babbling like pagans", "wicked", "adulterous", "Ninevah will ... condemn [you]", "you break the command of God", "teachings are but rules taught by men", "will be pulled up by the roots", "blind guides", "blind man", "guard against ... the teachings of the Pharisees and Sadducees", "you yourself do not enter ... the kingdom of heaven", "blind fools", "blind men", "Blind Pharisee", "you are like whitewashed tombs", "you are the children of those who murdered the prophets", "you snakes", "condemned to hell", "Pharisees ... rejected God's purpose for themselves", "you foolish people", "you are like unmarked graves", "you build tombs for the prophets, yet it was your forefathers who killed them", "will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world", "whom you slew between the temple and the altar", "you are not of my sheep", "you are of your father the devil", "a murderer from the beginning", "liar and the father of lies", "break the command of God for the sake of your tradition", "if God were your father, you would love me".


Not only did He make it clear that He did not come for the Canaanite woman, but "He said in reply, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of thehouse of Israel." Matthew 15:24", and He willfully insulted the jews by reminding them that they were EXCLUDED from this mission "But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me, John 10:26-27". As if though this wasn't enough, He even claimed that the jews were of a different God than He "Jesus said unto them, If Godwere your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me, John 8:42" and furthermore that their God was the devil "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from thebeginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, andthe father of it, John 8:44". He also told them that they could NOT be forgiven "Ye serpents, ye race of vipers, how can ye escape thedamnation of hell?Matthew 23:33", so for what Godly reason would Christ change His mind at precisely the moment that His crucifixion caused the earth to tremble and the veil to rent?

[Tumbleweed]

http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/misc/quote_icon.png Originally Posted by Shami-Amourae http://gold-silver.us/forum/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?p=797979#post797979)


Most likely scenario if things continue as they are:





From what I"ve read I don't think God condones miscegenation. Willie Martin has another article on adultery being miscegenation and I think he's right.

http://www.thechristianidentityforum...n/Adultery.pdf (http://www.thechristianidentityforum.net/downloads/martin/Adultery.pdf)



ADULTERY Willie Martin
We know from a study of the Scriptures that the word beast means a race or people who are not Israelites. In other words the Chinese, Jews, Negroes, as well as evil men who are both Israelites and non-Israelites.
From New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois. Copyright (C) 1988).


BEAST:
Figurative. In a figurative or symbolical sense, the term frequently occurs in Scripture and generally refers to the sensual and groveling or ferocious and brutal natures properly belonging to the brute creation. The psalmist speaks of himself as being "like a beast" before God, while giving way to merely sensuous considerations <Psalm. 73:22>. THE WORD IS SOMETIMES USED FIGURATIVELY OF BRUTAL MEN. Hence the phrase "I fought with wild beasts at Ephesus" <1 Corinthians 15:32, cf. Acts 19:29> is a figurative description of a fight with strong and exasperated enemies. For a similar use of the word see <Ecclesiastes 3:18; 2 Peter 2:12; Jude 10>.



A WILE BEAST IS THE SYMBOL OF SELFISH, TYRANNICAL MONARCHIES. The four beasts in <Daniel 7:3,17,23>, represent four kingdoms <Ezekiel 34:28; Jeremiah 12:9>.
IN THE APOCALYPSE THE BEAST OBVIOUSLY MEANS A WORLDLY POWER WHOSE RISING OUT OF THE SEA INDICATES THAT IT OWES ITS ORIGIN TO THE COMMOTIONS OF THE PEOPLE <Revelation 13:1; 15:2; 17:8>.
The "four beasts" (Gk. zoa, "living creatures," not therion, "beast" in the strict sense) of the KJV of <Revelation 4:6> should be rendered "four living ones" or "four living creatures" (so NASB and NIV). See Cherub, Cherubim. (from New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois. Copyright (C) 1988.)



From Fausset's Bible Dictionary: BEAST
SYMBOLICALLY, MAN SEVERED FROM GOD AND RESTING ON HIS OWN PHYSICAL OR INTELLECTUAL STRENGTH, OR MATERIAL RESOURCES, IS BEASTLY AND BRUTISH. He is only manly when Godly, for man was made in the image of God. So ASAPH DESCRIBES HIMSELF, WHEN ENVYING THE PROSPEROUS WICKED," I WAS AS A BEAST before Thee" (<Psalm. 73:22>). "Man in honor (apart from God) abideth not, he is like the beasts that perish" (<Psalm. 49:12>). The multitude opposing Messiah are butso many "bulls" and "calves" to be stilled by His "rebuke" (<Psalm. 68:30>). Those "THAT WALK AFTER THE FLESH IN THE LUST OF UNCLEANNESS, AS NATURAL BRUTE BEASTS, ARE MADE ONLY TO BE TAKEN AND DESTROYED" (<2 Peter 2:12>). So persecutors of Christians, as Paul's opponents at Ephesus (<1 Corinthians 15:32>). The "beast" (<Revelation 13; Revelation 15; Revelation 17; Revelation 19>) is the combination of all these sensual, lawless, God opposing features. THE FOUR SUCCESSIVE WORLD EMPIRES ARE REPRESENTED AS BEASTS coming up out of the sea whereon the winds of heaven strove (<Daniel :7>). The kingdom of Messiah, on the contrary, is that of "the Son of MAN," supplanting utterly the former, and alone everlasting and world wide. In <Revelation 4; 5>, the four cherubic forms are not "beasts" (as KJV), but "living creatures" ([zoa]). The "beast" ([theerion (grk 2342)]) is literally the wild beast, untamed to the obedience of Christ and God (<Romans 8:7>). THE “HARLOT” OR APOSTATE CHURCH (compare <Revelation 12:1>, etc., with <Revelation 17:1>, etc.; <Isaiah 1:21>) SITS FIRST ON THE BEAST, which again is explained as "seven mountains upon which she sitteth"; probably seven universal God-opposed empires (contrast <Jeremiah 51:25> with <Isaiah 2:2>) of which the seven-hilled Rome is the prominent embodiment, namely, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Mede Persia, Greece, Rome (including the modern Latin kingdoms), and the Germano-Slavonic empire. The woman sitting on them is the church conformed to the world; therefore the instrument of her sin is retributively made the instrument of her punishment (<Ezekiel 23; Jeremiah 2:19; Revelation 17:16>).



"The spirit of man," even as it normally ascends to God, whose image he bore, so at death "goeth upward"; and the spirit of the beast, even as its desires tend downward to merely temporal wants, "goeth downward" (<Ecclesiastes 3:21>). God warns against cruelty to the brute (<Deuteronomy 22:6-7>). He regarded the "much cattle" of Nineveh (<Jonah 4:11>). He commanded that they should be given the sabbath rest. As to the creature's final deliverance, see <Romans 8:20-23>. (from Fausset's Bible Dictionary)
Exodus 20:3-17 1). Thou shalt have no other gods before me.



2). Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.



3). Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.



4). Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, andall that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.



5). Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.


6). Thou shalt not kill. (Should have been rendered “murder.”


7). Thou shalt not commit adultery.


8). Thou shalt not steal.


9). Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.


10). Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
(KJV)


Now the 7th commandment is to not commit adultery; the 10th commandment is to not covet ones neighbors wife; the two would be the same commandment. Therefore, it is obvious that the 7th is entirely different than the 10th which is to covet anothers wife.


Therefore, the following verses make much more sense when we realize that “Adultery” is the mixing of another race or people other than a brother or sister Israelite.
Leviticus 18:23: “NEITHER SHALT THOU LIE WITH ANY BEAST TO DEFILE THYSELF THEREWITH: NEITHER SHALL ANY WOMAN STAND BEFORE A BEAST TO LIE DOWN THERETO: it is confusion.”


Yahweh does not kill just to be killing; and to kill an animal because a woman had intercourse with it would be unfair, unjust and unreasonable because the beast would not know any better than to treat the woman as another animal. Yahweh simply would not do this.


Leviticus 20:15-16: “And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. And IF A WOMAN APPROACH UNTO ANY BEAST, and LIE DOWN THERETO, THOU SHALT KILL THE WOMAN, and THE BEAST: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”


Here again, this states that either the man or the woman that lies down with a beast would be put to death together. Again Yahweh would not kill an animal because it did not know better than to lie with the woman or man. Another thing, if anyone has ever seen an animal copulate with others they can quickly see that the animal would not lie down, as it does its copulating standing up. There are no animals that copulate in a prostrate position, lying down position.


Therefore, common sense, which we realize that few Christians have when studying the scriptures, would tell one that to commit adultery is to mix with the other races which is an abomination to Yahweh, in itself.

[Tumbleweed]

Most likely scenario if things continue as they are:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niicDbbSky0




From what I"ve read I don't think God condones miscegenation. Willie Martin has another article on adultery being miscegenation and I think he's right.

http://www.thechristianidentityforum...n/Adultery.pdf (http://www.thechristianidentityforum.net/downloads/martin/Adultery.pdf)



ADULTERY Willie Martin
We know from a study of the Scriptures that the word beast means a race or people who are not Israelites. In other words the Chinese, Jews, Negroes, as well as evil men who are both Israelites and non-Israelites.
From New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois. Copyright (C) 1988).


BEAST:
Figurative. In a figurative or symbolical sense, the term frequently occurs in Scripture and generally refers to the sensual and groveling or ferocious and brutal natures properly belonging to the brute creation. The psalmist speaks of himself as being "like a beast" before God, while giving way to merely sensuous considerations <Psalm. 73:22>. THE WORD IS SOMETIMES USED FIGURATIVELY OF BRUTAL MEN. Hence the phrase "I fought with wild beasts at Ephesus" <1 Corinthians 15:32, cf. Acts 19:29> is a figurative description of a fight with strong and exasperated enemies. For a similar use of the word see <Ecclesiastes 3:18; 2 Peter 2:12; Jude 10>.



A WILE BEAST IS THE SYMBOL OF SELFISH, TYRANNICAL MONARCHIES. The four beasts in <Daniel 7:3,17,23>, represent four kingdoms <Ezekiel 34:28; Jeremiah 12:9>.
IN THE APOCALYPSE THE BEAST OBVIOUSLY MEANS A WORLDLY POWER WHOSE RISING OUT OF THE SEA INDICATES THAT IT OWES ITS ORIGIN TO THE COMMOTIONS OF THE PEOPLE <Revelation 13:1; 15:2; 17:8>.
The "four beasts" (Gk. zoa, "living creatures," not therion, "beast" in the strict sense) of the KJV of <Revelation 4:6> should be rendered "four living ones" or "four living creatures" (so NASB and NIV). See Cherub, Cherubim. (from New Unger's Bible Dictionary) (originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois. Copyright (C) 1988.)



From Fausset's Bible Dictionary: BEAST
SYMBOLICALLY, MAN SEVERED FROM GOD AND RESTING ON HIS OWN PHYSICAL OR INTELLECTUAL STRENGTH, OR MATERIAL RESOURCES, IS BEASTLY AND BRUTISH. He is only manly when Godly, for man was made in the image of God. So ASAPH DESCRIBES HIMSELF, WHEN ENVYING THE PROSPEROUS WICKED," I WAS AS A BEAST before Thee" (<Psalm. 73:22>). "Man in honor (apart from God) abideth not, he is like the beasts that perish" (<Psalm. 49:12>). The multitude opposing Messiah are butso many "bulls" and "calves" to be stilled by His "rebuke" (<Psalm. 68:30>). Those "THAT WALK AFTER THE FLESH IN THE LUST OF UNCLEANNESS, AS NATURAL BRUTE BEASTS, ARE MADE ONLY TO BE TAKEN AND DESTROYED" (<2 Peter 2:12>). So persecutors of Christians, as Paul's opponents at Ephesus (<1 Corinthians 15:32>). The "beast" (<Revelation 13; Revelation 15; Revelation 17; Revelation 19>) is the combination of all these sensual, lawless, God opposing features. THE FOUR SUCCESSIVE WORLD EMPIRES ARE REPRESENTED AS BEASTS coming up out of the sea whereon the winds of heaven strove (<Daniel :7>). The kingdom of Messiah, on the contrary, is that of "the Son of MAN," supplanting utterly the former, and alone everlasting and world wide. In <Revelation 4; 5>, the four cherubic forms are not "beasts" (as KJV), but "living creatures" ([zoa]). The "beast" ([theerion (grk 2342)]) is literally the wild beast, untamed to the obedience of Christ and God (<Romans 8:7>). THE “HARLOT” OR APOSTATE CHURCH (compare <Revelation 12:1>, etc., with <Revelation 17:1>, etc.; <Isaiah 1:21>) SITS FIRST ON THE BEAST, which again is explained as "seven mountains upon which she sitteth"; probably seven universal God-opposed empires (contrast <Jeremiah 51:25> with <Isaiah 2:2>) of which the seven-hilled Rome is the prominent embodiment, namely, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Mede Persia, Greece, Rome (including the modern Latin kingdoms), and the Germano-Slavonic empire. The woman sitting on them is the church conformed to the world; therefore the instrument of her sin is retributively made the instrument of her punishment (<Ezekiel 23; Jeremiah 2:19; Revelation 17:16>).



"The spirit of man," even as it normally ascends to God, whose image he bore, so at death "goeth upward"; and the spirit of the beast, even as its desires tend downward to merely temporal wants, "goeth downward" (<Ecclesiastes 3:21>). God warns against cruelty to the brute (<Deuteronomy 22:6-7>). He regarded the "much cattle" of Nineveh (<Jonah 4:11>). He commanded that they should be given the sabbath rest. As to the creature's final deliverance, see <Romans 8:20-23>. (from Fausset's Bible Dictionary)
Exodus 20:3-17 1). Thou shalt have no other gods before me.



2). Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.



3). Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.



4). Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, andall that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.



5). Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.


6). Thou shalt not kill. (Should have been rendered “murder.”


7). Thou shalt not commit adultery.


8). Thou shalt not steal.


9). Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.


10). Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
(KJV)


Now the 7th commandment is to not commit adultery; the 10th commandment is to not covet ones neighbors wife; the two would be the same commandment. Therefore, it is obvious that the 7th is entirely different than the 10th which is to covet anothers wife.


Therefore, the following verses make much more sense when we realize that “Adultery” is the mixing of another race or people other than a brother or sister Israelite.
Leviticus 18:23: “NEITHER SHALT THOU LIE WITH ANY BEAST TO DEFILE THYSELF THEREWITH: NEITHER SHALL ANY WOMAN STAND BEFORE A BEAST TO LIE DOWN THERETO: it is confusion.”


Yahweh does not kill just to be killing; and to kill an animal because a woman had intercourse with it would be unfair, unjust and unreasonable because the beast would not know any better than to treat the woman as another animal. Yahweh simply would not do this.


Leviticus 20:15-16: “And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. And IF A WOMAN APPROACH UNTO ANY BEAST, and LIE DOWN THERETO, THOU SHALT KILL THE WOMAN, and THE BEAST: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”


Here again, this states that either the man or the woman that lies down with a beast would be put to death together. Again Yahweh would not kill an animal because it did not know better than to lie with the woman or man. Another thing, if anyone has ever seen an animal copulate with others they can quickly see that the animal would not lie down, as it does its copulating standing up. There are no animals that copulate in a prostrate position, lying down position.


Therefore, common sense, which we realize that few Christians have when studying the scriptures, would tell one that to commit adultery is to mix with the other races which is an abomination to Yahweh, in itself.

[Tumbleweed]

I'm having trouble trying to edit and post again and it's pissing me off. I didn't mean to double post above but shit happens and I can't change it.

[Tumbleweed]

I think something needs to replace religion so White people have a spine. Religion will die with the increase of technology, automation, and transhumanism. The best replacement in my opinion is 4chan/8chan POL internet culture. Basically anti-Cultural Marxism. I call it Cultural Fascism personally. Cultural Marxism is the current religion of the Left. We need an atheistic political religion like that for the Right. Call it Neo-Reactionary, Alt-Right, whatever. It's being developed on /pol/ already.



AgainI think christianity is fine if people will study it and not believe what the Jews tell us to believe about it. Another article below by willie Martin on christians needing to fight evil.

http://www.fathersmanifesto.net/wm/wm0222a.html


Christians Are To Fight The Ungodly - Part 1 Many of us, Israel Christians, get so sick of hearing that Christians are not supposed to defend themselves. Than Christianity is a religion of self destruction of the White Race, and other such drivel; from otherwise intelligent men. Because of the false teachings of the Judeo-Christian traitors in America's pulpits; on television, radio; and in the movies they never learn that Christianity is not a pacifist religion as some would suppose from watching the cowardly Judeo-Christian clergy, as they kowtow to the antichrist Jews and government agents. That some of the most courageous mighty men of war of all time were White Christians.


Such teaching is not Scriptural; it is the teachings of people who have lived in countries where the ownership of guns has been condemned for many years; and those people have been taught that no one is to own a gun except someone who lives in the country or is a police officer or soldier: It is also the teaching of cowards and traitors to Almighty God and the Lord Jesus Christ. It is my firm belief that if a man/woman will not fight for family, or Jesus Christ in this world, then they will certainly not fight for Christ when He returns to rid, the Kingdom of God, of the evil ones and the results of their evil among His Chosen.


"But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel." (1 Timothy 5:8)


Reference has been many by many: "believe it is important to understand what Jesus meant because he plainly taught that His Kingdom was not to be set up by force prior to His Second Coming." But I have been unable to find Christ telling us this.


What I do find about the Kingdom and force is: "And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force." (Matt 11:12)
We further find Christ telling us: "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword." (Matt 10:34)


Christ went even further and told us: "hen said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. (In that day and time a sword was what a gun is today, a weapon for self-defense) For I say unto you, that this that is written must yet be accomplished in me, And he was reckoned among the transgressors: for the things concerning me have an end. And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. And he said unto them, it is enough." (Luke 22:36-38)


They will also come up with that old song; "Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword." (Matt 26:52) Meaning that if He, Christ, should live by the sword against these men; that He would eventually die by the sword and that was not what God wanted or intended that He should do. He had to obey and follow what had been prophesied of Him. But notice: Christ did not tell Peter to get rid of the sword because it was evil, but simply to put into his place, meaning that the sword is not an evil thing, but that His capture by the Jews and His crucifixion had to be, and that He could and would do nothing to prevent God's will.


For He said immediately after: "Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?" (Matt 26:53)


We also find the following in Luke 22:49-51: "When they which were about him saw what would follow, they said unto him, Lord, shall we smite with the sword? And one of them smote the servant of the high priest, and cut off his right ear. And Jesus answered and said, suffer ye thus far. And he touched his ear, and healed him." Now we can see clearly here that Christ did not tell His apostles and those who were following Him not to fight, but to suffer His being captured at this particular time and place.


Christ also told Peter in John 18:11: "Then said Jesus unto Peter, Put up thy sword into the sheath: The cup which my father hath given me, shall I not drink it?" Here we can see Christ telling His disciples and those who were following Him that it was God's Will that He be taken and crucified. That they should not fight to defend Him at that time. He did not tell them not to fight to deliver His Kingdom from the enemy.


Jesus told Pilate: "Jesus answered, my kingdom is not of this world (Christ is saying that His kingdom was not of that Roman and Jewish world): If my kingdom were of this world (Here again He is using the word "this" meaning that His kingdom was not of the Roman and Jewish world, but was someplace else; but if they were in His Kingdom then His Servants would fight), then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence." (John 18:36)


There is nothing in the Word of God which even suggests that His people simply lay down and let the antichrists and the evil ones walk over them. For He gave us warning that the unGodly would "Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also." (John 15:20)


Christ also related "Therefore also said the wisdom of God, I will send them prophets and apostles, and some of them they shall slay and persecute." (Luke 11:49)


Christ condemns the man who will not defend his own family: "But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. (1 Timothy 5:8)


So we must fight, not only to defend the faith, but to defend our home, our family and our country and the Kingdom of God, which is the United States of America. Which is why God would not allow the South to separate from the North as He did in ancient Israel.


If it were not for men who owned guns and willing to use them, these self-righteous men and women would not have the country and all the material goods that surrounds them. They are indeed ungrateful.


It is like those who say that God's Laws have been done away with; for if there is no law then there is no sin, and if there is no sin then Christ died in vain. For without law there is no trespass and without a trespass of the law there is no sin; for sin is the transgression of the law.


"Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law." (I John 3:4)


Now make no mistake I believe that these people sincerely believe in Christ; they believe in God, and they can do marvelous things because they can tap into God's awesome power through their faith. Just as the Canaanite woman when she asked Christ to heal her daughter and in Matthew 15:28 He said: "Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour." (And in Mark 7:28)
So you see Christ did not heal her daughter but her faith did! For Christ said; "O woman, great is thy faith; be it unto thee even as thou wilt."


Now these people mentioned above have such faith and will say to the Lord in that day: "Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?" (Matthew 7:22) So we see here that there are people who can prophesy; cast out devils; and have and will do many wonderful works, but Christ will say to them: "And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity (lawlessness, do not obey God's laws, statutes and judgments)." (Matthew 7:23)

[Shami-Amourae]

Religion will disappear eventually unless technological progress is reverted.

That's why it's important to have an atheistic "religion" to fill the void.

The Left went to Cultural Marxism.

We need Cultural Fascism.




You come from the assumption that Christianity is the "Truth" or something. To me it's not. It's just been a tool to control people.

[singular_me]

ohhh my god... cultural fascism or fundamentalism... the end of society as we know it is coming but here is something to chew on:

extremes = same = opposites always merge by mutual annihilation (world's position today)

the best position, is equilibrium, remaining centered.

You guys seem to be unaware that Holistic Sciences is gaining ground... keep an eye on that trend ;D

[madfranks]

Yeah but who are the biggest allies AND enemies of the Jews. The Christians.

The Jews seek to destroy the Christians.

The Christians seek to give all their wealth, resources, and intelligence to Jews.

It's completely insane. You can't have a Christian rival when the problem is Christianity itself. In other words the religion itself is what's pushing for the destruction of civilization. Look at all the idiot Christian Cuckservatives who run off to Africa and feed Dindus, and adopt Dindu kids so they can say "I'm not really racist!"



Here's the thing. The Jew is getting all of this power from cucked Christians...

You're right, when discussing modern 21st century Christianity. It wasn't always like it is today. The Christians of 100 years ago wouldn't put up with this shit.

[Shami-Amourae]

extremes = same = opposites always merge by mutual annihilation (world's position today)



The other extreme:
https://8ch.net/pol/src/1446206254357.jpg


Clean streets? Healthy families? Happy workers?

What a nightmare.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjs8xVaAC98

[mick silver]

I think it to late to fight them now so the house will have to burn down to win now ....
I think the main point of the video I posted is that the white middle class christian family is the foundation of this country and the Jews had to destroy them to destroy this nation and enslave us. What's needed is for this country to return to the christian values that made it a good place to begin with. It's well laid out in this video how the Jews have been destroying this nation. What they've done needs to be reversed. Hitler did it in Germany and Queen Isabella did it in Spain. You have to know the enemy, what they're doing and how they're doing it to fight them.

[Cebu_4_2]

I think it to late to fight them now so the house will have to burn down to win now ....


Since most jews in the USi and Israehel appear to also be white there is going to be quite a disturbance in the jews leadership. They will be like cockroaches and scurry away from problems. This is the only time in hystory that other civilizations failed to call them out and boot them from the countries they rule.

They do in fact RULE the west, anyone thinking they do not and it is just antisemitism needs a blunt force kick in the temple. If our white race accepts this and cowers because of the medical and pharmaceutical empires, let them. I don't fit in that catagory. FUCK THEM and I will fight for that. If I am the last white man standing then so be it. The rest of you bicker amongst yourselves like you are enemies but in fact you are on the same side. Jewery works in many ways... fucking idiots.

[Horn]

Religion will disappear eventually unless technological progress is reverted.

Science and Technology are being reverted.

Gaia and climate change Earth worship is the new religion setup to replace Science and Philosophy

you will be made to tithe to by State Empowered Inquisitors because you (man) are inherently evil.

Science and technology are relegated to Sony Bono copyright laws, CERN communal type loser experiences and SAMSUCK robot experiments.

http://www.crystalinks.com/gaia.html

[vacuum]

Forget marriage. You don't even want to date a woman who is past a certain age. Look at what happened to this guy. Got a felony for nothing.

Forgive me if this incoherent, I am weeping as I write this. I am a 24 year old man. I fell into dating an older single mother earlier this year. She cheated on me and when I tried to break up with her she called the cops and said I abused her. The cops arrested me without even asking me if it was true. I was bailed out and given a 60 day protective order to stay away from her. I ignored her countless text, emails, voicemails, handwritten letters left on my trucks windshield for 2 weeks. She told me if I met her she would tell the cops the truth that she made it up. I came over and she gave me to falsely dated letters of confession. We were driving down the road later that night almost to her house in a suburban neighborhood when she, out of nowhere, threw my dog out of my vehicle, jumped out and ran to a random house screaming as if I was trying to rape her. This was right in the middle of a civil discussion, completely by surprise. The cops arrested me again for violating the protective order. Jail again. My state appointed attorney told me to accept the plea deal. 8 years probation, 250 hours of community service etc, and that I'd have 30 days to change my mind and think about it. He lied. I had 30 days to appeal and the judge has to decide if I can get my day in court. Hired good attorney for 7500 dollars to appeal. Judge takes it under consideration for 2 weeks and I get a call not 2 hours ago saying the motion is denied. I have a mountain of evidence showing I'm innocent. I am an army veteran with no prior criminal record from a good relatively wealthy family. I had a good future in front of me. I don't know where I am going with this. I just had to get this off of my heart. I have a felony on my record now and my future is ruined without ever even having a day in court. I don't know what to do.

[Hitch]

Forget marriage. You don't even want to date a woman who is past a certain age. Look at what happened to this guy. Got a felony for nothing.

Forgive me if this incoherent, I am weeping as I write this. I am a 24 year old man. I fell into dating an older single mother earlier this year. She cheated on me and when I tried to break up with her she called the cops and said I abused her. The cops arrested me without even asking me if it was true. I was bailed out and given a 60 day protective order to stay away from her. I ignored her countless text, emails, voicemails, handwritten letters left on my trucks windshield for 2 weeks. She told me if I met her she would tell the cops the truth that she made it up. I came over and she gave me to falsely dated letters of confession. We were driving down the road later that night almost to her house in a suburban neighborhood when she, out of nowhere, threw my dog out of my vehicle, jumped out and ran to a random house screaming as if I was trying to rape her. This was right in the middle of a civil discussion, completely by surprise. The cops arrested me again for violating the protective order. Jail again. My state appointed attorney told me to accept the plea deal. 8 years probation, 250 hours of community service etc, and that I'd have 30 days to change my mind and think about it. He lied. I had 30 days to appeal and the judge has to decide if I can get my day in court. Hired good attorney for 7500 dollars to appeal. Judge takes it under consideration for 2 weeks and I get a call not 2 hours ago saying the motion is denied. I have a mountain of evidence showing I'm innocent. I am an army veteran with no prior criminal record from a good relatively wealthy family. I had a good future in front of me. I don't know where I am going with this. I just had to get this off of my heart. I have a felony on my record now and my future is ruined without ever even having a day in court. I don't know what to do.

It's a choice now. Freedom, or women. I guess I'll be free and celibate. I don't like drama either, so the choice is pretty easy.

[Shami-Amourae]

It's a choice now. Freedom, or women. I guess I'll be free and celibate. I don't like drama either, so the choice is pretty easy.


I think this idiocy will die out, or civilization will end.

Either way women will have to get sane again, and THEN I might considering hooking up with a female.


Other than that I'm staying celibate and focusing on my happiness.

I do think there may be hope with Slavic women though who haven't been brainwashed by the West.

[Shami-Amourae]

Forget marriage. You don't even want to date a woman who is past a certain age. Look at what happened to this guy. Got a felony for nothing.

Forgive me if this incoherent, I am weeping as I write this. I am a 24 year old man. I fell into dating an older single mother earlier this year. She cheated on me and when I tried to break up with her she called the cops and said I abused her. The cops arrested me without even asking me if it was true. I was bailed out and given a 60 day protective order to stay away from her. I ignored her countless text, emails, voicemails, handwritten letters left on my trucks windshield for 2 weeks. She told me if I met her she would tell the cops the truth that she made it up. I came over and she gave me to falsely dated letters of confession. We were driving down the road later that night almost to her house in a suburban neighborhood when she, out of nowhere, threw my dog out of my vehicle, jumped out and ran to a random house screaming as if I was trying to rape her. This was right in the middle of a civil discussion, completely by surprise. The cops arrested me again for violating the protective order. Jail again. My state appointed attorney told me to accept the plea deal. 8 years probation, 250 hours of community service etc, and that I'd have 30 days to change my mind and think about it. He lied. I had 30 days to appeal and the judge has to decide if I can get my day in court. Hired good attorney for 7500 dollars to appeal. Judge takes it under consideration for 2 weeks and I get a call not 2 hours ago saying the motion is denied. I have a mountain of evidence showing I'm innocent. I am an army veteran with no prior criminal record from a good relatively wealthy family. I had a good future in front of me. I don't know where I am going with this. I just had to get this off of my heart. I have a felony on my record now and my future is ruined without ever even having a day in court. I don't know what to do.

I think this is the OP:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3rjch9/im_in_fucking_tears_right_now_a_woman_used_the/



I found this nugget:

babybopp (https://www.reddit.com/user/babybopp) 30 points 4 hours ago* This is my personal list of women I avoid


single moms: EDIT: here is why. IF it is not daddy issues it is either one of these. Alpha widow, crazy Ex boyfriend, the mom herself is the crazy one, kid problems, if she has daughters best stay the fuck away from them , if you break up with her she could easily accuse you of molesting her kids, there is no time for doing anything because kids, ex husband/boyfriend/ex in law issues, etc.. and always wear a rubber with them before you end up on an episode of maury and never be left alone with their kids.

Girls whose mom divorced their dad and she "raised" them.- They have no father figure in their lives. usually find all their sisters are single. they are raised to believe men are evil and commitment is a sign of weakness. When one gets a boyfriend they make it a "it is either him or us" thing. Same with the divorced mother, she guilt trips her daughters into you are having fun while she found happiness in being a spinster shit. These girls make the worst kind of girlfriends. They are conditioned not to respect men. Give your heart to a man and he will shit on it. If you find a single girl early to late 30's who spends an unusual amount of time talking to her mom on the phone about everything including your sexual escapades.. move on

control freaks- a woman who wants to control your every move. these women usually have anger issues. stay away. how to know you have bagged one, when she gets mad at you for following the GPS instructions to go somewhere, when she "knows" a better and faster route.

women who berate, insult or belittle people. it is just a matter of time before it is you. How to spot one. If you see her talk shit to her family member and treat him badly or gets mad at a stranger for a small reason, like a waiter.. one day it will be you she talks to like that. Her kindness and gentle nature towards you is just a facade to rope you in.

narcissists, it will never be about both of you. Selfies galore, move on..

Women who treat pets like children. Reality is her dog is more important than you.

loud violent and mean women. aka ratchets.

leeches and gold diggers. she never buys you anything, she never pays for anything, all her money somehow finds its way to her mom's account to "support" her...

women who think that the mere fact you are fucking them is a heavenly gift. Do not participate in mutual sex. Expect their pussy licked, never give blowjobs. use sex as a tool for manipulation in relationships. Lie like a fucking log when being fucked, DOESN'T do doggy and you can forget about anal...because her daddy raised her to be that special snowflake that is one of a kind.

and most importantly, never date a rebound. They are the most unstable and have psycho tendencies. They are extremely manipulative in grooming a man to think that he is the one. Slowly the psycho leaks out and the man realizes he is a shadow of what she wants. Her inner hamster has slowly raised the Ex who dumped her to godlike status. Every memory exaggerated and makes her heart flutter. Somehow, you keep bumping into her Ex when you are together, she takes you to places and do things she used to do with her ex. She is the worst kind of woman to date especially if she has been alpha widowed, she will drop you like a turd in water. And then you are left wondering.." didn't she constantly complain that her ex used to cheat and beat her up???"

and one last honorable mention. girls who only have guy friends. Those famous words, women are bitches, i dont get along with them and only have guy friends. Reality is that she like surrounding herself with men who lust over her. 90% of them being white knights. Women constantly judge each other and her avoidance of this is so that she can remain in her little bubble where she is not accountable to any female standards like working out to look good in a bikini or treat a man right. Any sign of problems in your relationship and she is out with her "friends". it is a female version of abundance mentality. You are lucky to have me. These women usually have beta boyfriends that think they are the lucky one who conquered her. Reality is that you are merely just a plate to her. if you are that guy that comes home to find your SO "chilling with a bunch of guys".. yes it is you i refer to. You are just like the ramen noodles broke college kids endure till they move up and eat sushi. Don't be ramen noodles guy..don't!

[Shami-Amourae]

A Dallas County grand jury declined to indict a Dallas County State District Judge on Thursday who was accused of assaulting his girlfriend.

Judge Carlos Cortez was arrested in December after his 26-year-old girlfriend, Maggie Strother, told officers that Cortez choked her and bent her over the railing of his 20th floor balcony at the Le Tour Condominium building in Dallas.

Cortez was arrested and charged with family violence assault.

Cortez's attorneys, however, said that Cortez was trying to save his girlfriend from killing herself, and that Strother was suicidal and had mixed prescription drugs with alcohol.

Cortez defended himself Thursday night in an exclusive interview with FOX 4, and he and his attorneys, Kevin Brooks and Pete Schulte, said there was surveillance video taken from the building where Strother said she was assaulted.

In that footage, Cortez can be seen talking to Strother the night of his arrest.

Their conversation can't be heard, but Cortez told FOX 4 that in the video, he had asked Strother to leave after she tried to throw herself off the balcony, and she pleaded with him to let her come back to Cortez's apartment.

In another video Cortez recorded in his car while he was driving, Strother can be seen getting out of the car while it was moving. She lands on the ground and asks afterward why Cortez pushed her out.

Cortez told FOX 4 he shot that video because it was not the first time Strother was drunk and acting out, and said he recorded her to show her how she was acting when she sobered up.

Brooks and Schulte also say a rookie Dallas police officer did not fully investigate the situation.

Shortly after Cortez was cleared, Strother's attorney released a statement saying, "We are disappointed with the grand jury's decision, but Maggie stands by her statements, and nothing that happened today changes that one bit. I am proud of Maggie for having the courage to stand up to someone in such a powerful position. And there is a lesson to be learned here: It is important for all abuse victims to stand up to their abusers, even at the risk of being told there is not enough evidence to prosecute."

Cortez said that he's a different man after the experience.

"This has touched every aspect of my life," said Cortez. "Not only my professional career, which has been under attack, but also my personal life. It has affected my family, my friends, but also it is an eye-opening experience. This can be something others can learn from. I would never want this to happen to anyone else, to be falsely accused of something so horrific."

Cortez was elected to the 44th State Civil District Court in 2006 and is up for re-election this year.

His opponent, Bonnie Goldstein, sent FOX 4 a statement reading, "I launched my campaign for this office before this episode occurred. I stand by my strong belief that the citizens of Dallas will be better served by someone who is both qualified and conducts herself with dignity. When I am elected, I will be in the news for the right reasons."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op4scME3Ym4

[singular_me]

It is always the same however. everything has been corrupted Horn, even the gaia concept. Gaia followers are merely suffering from a right brain imbalance causing extreme naivete, just like any other fundamentalists.

according to gnosticism and hermeticism, matter is feminine (nurturing element, she feeds every living thing) and light, masculine (fathering element, sustains earth's life) . It is considered as an alchemic union.

On a cosmic scale, Matter (atoms) is compressed Light. All is ONE. Walter Russell explains this in his book, The Universal One ... its available for free on the net. First part is a very easy read... the math part a little complex.

when the bible says, in the beginning was the Word, it merely means the division of the One into Two caused by a Vibration FIRST







Science and Technology are being reverted.

Gaia and climate change Earth worship is the new religion setup to replace Science and Philosophy

you will be made to tithe to by State Empowered Inquisitors because you (man) are inherently evil.

Science and technology are relegated to Sony Bono copyright laws, CERN communal type loser experiences and SAMSUCK robot experiments.

http://www.crystalinks.com/gaia.html

[Horn]

It is considered as an alchemic union.

Humans aren't permitted to touch this.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buvtE4tNShU