Justice for Germans Documentary

[singular_me]

another hitler stooge side effect... if only germans had known about the big chess game

just never, ever follow orders when it is about killing or harming other people.
-----------------
Eisenhower's Rhine-Meadows Death Camps - Documentary
‘The untold story of Eisenhower’s Rhine Meadows Death Camps – A Deliberate Policy of Extermination of the Surrendered German forces by the Allies in post war Germany (Rheinwiesenlager). Full documentary, plus additional background information, and a memorial for the victims. A German language film, translated to English, re-edited, narrated, and published by Justice for Germans


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbp61fOVFaE

[Neuro]

another hitler stooge side effect... if only germans had known about the big chess game

just never, ever follow orders when it is about killing or harming other people.
-----------------
Eisenhower's Rhine-Meadows Death Camps - Documentary
‘The untold story of Eisenhower’s Rhine Meadows Death Camps – A Deliberate Policy of Extermination of the Surrendered German forces by the Allies in post war Germany (Rheinwiesenlager). Full documentary, plus additional background information, and a memorial for the victims. A German language film, translated to English, re-edited, narrated, and published by Justice for Germans


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbp61fOVFaE
I think it would have been more relevant if you pointed out the stooges Eisenhower and Rosewelt after seeing this video. But I guess you subscribe to the Zionist victors version of history instead...

[singular_me]

I think it would have been more relevant if you pointed out the stooges Eisenhower and Rosewelt after seeing this video. But I guess you subscribe to the Zionist victors version of history instead...

war is just immoral... whatever the side.

[Neuro]

war is just immoral... whatever the side.
The video talked about what happened AFTER Germany was defeated, iow after the war and the immoral behavior of the victors vs the defeated. Did you see it?

[Jerrylynnb]

I fail to relate to those who perpetually bad-mouth Germans for their going to war. The leader of Austria, along with his wife and several of his office, visited Serbia, which was part of the Austrian nation, and, after terrorists killed two of his troupe accompanying him, and after he defiantly choose to continue with his open-car parade, fell victim to another terrorist who not only shot him dead, but his wife also. Serbia REFUSED to prosecute the killer (a jew, of course, who later bragged about it), and, after all attempts at justice via civil processes, the Austrians mounted a military campaing to bring the killers, and their protectors, to justice. Now stop right there. If you think the Austrians were somehow *wrong*, under the childish notion that ANY WAR is immoral, then, I suppose you must subscribe to the idiotic philosophy that one is NEVER justified in seeking justice when murder, theft, torture, or any kind of assault is perpetrated against you.

No sir. I, along with the bulk of humanity, recognize that there is a time and circumstances when it is appropriate, and even CALLED FOR, to take up arms to seek justice for a blatant act of terrorism that results in brutal murder, especially as was committed in broad daylight in front of a parade crowd. The Austrians *HAD* to react, or resign to being slaves open to any assault anyone cared to visit upon them.

But, to all those who condemn the Germans (same-bloodedness as Austrians) for their campaign into Serbia, seeking justice, you are simply showing yourself to be prejudicially predisposed AGAINST the germanics of Europe, as nothing else makes sense.

That was 1914, and, it took 30 years of fighting between the Germanics against those prejudiced against them to finally succumb to total defeat.
Blaming those two wars (really ONE, with a 20 year nervous pause between them) on the germanics is coming straight from a prejudiced mindset.

I am NOT pro-german, but, I recognize the evil perpertrated against them, even when phoney historians try to cover the stench with lies and fairy tales - the stink fouls the nose.

[singular_me]

yes I watched the whole doc yesterday. Your point of view is one sided, mine is non-dualistic, about the half empty/full glass theory.

it is IMMORAL to obey order to go kill or harm people... as much for the germans as for the so called allies. this movie is **also** about the consequences of such immorality. I feel as much for the germans as anybody else caught in the immorality of war

Building a war machine is just wrong and immoral.

taking side = war is here to say = road to serfdom

I watched the other day a presentation explaining the evil of following orders that empowers the NWO. It is time to acknowledge this fact.

there has never been any good war, its all about money, and the germans are/were as much as ignorant than most people today. If they had known they would have given hitler the finger... any leader promoting war should be systematically impeached.

War manifests the ugliness of mankind's collective psyche and it must stop... it is because people dont dare face this ugliness within that we are now faced with depopulation.



The video talked about what happened AFTER Germany was defeated, iow after the war and the immoral behavior of the victors vs the defeated. Did you see it?


WHY IS THERE NOW A BLACK PROBLEM IN AMERICA

When You Kill Ten Million Africans You Aren’t Called ‘Hitler’
11th November 2015

10af4fbf-16e8-4d01-8a9d-86b7754193d8

‘Take a look at this picture. Do you know who it is?

Most people haven’t heard of him.

But you should have. When you see his face or hear his name you should get as sick in your stomach as when you read about Mussolini or Hitler or see one of their pictures. You see, he killed over 10 million people in the Congo.

His name is King Leopold II of Belgium.

He “owned” the Congo during his reign as the constitutional monarch of Belgium. After several failed colonial attempts in Asia and Africa, he settled on the Congo. He “bought” it and enslaved its people, turning the entire country into his own personal slave plantation. He disguised his business transactions as “philanthropic” and “scientific” efforts under the banner of the International African Society. He used their enslaved labor to extract Congolese resources and services. His reign was enforced through work camps, body mutilations, executions, torture, and his private army.’
http://www.filmsforaction.org/news/when_you_kill_ten_million_africans_you_arent_calle d_hitler/

[singular_me]

the edit function isnt working, so I am clarifying.


by WHY IS THERE NOW A BLACK PROBLEM IN AMERICA, I am referring to the same mindset that that brought upon today race war.

Not derailing just showing similarities in ideologies and consequences

here is another example

King Edward VII of Great Britain: Evil Demiurge of the Triple Entente and World War 1
http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/king-edward-vii-of-great-britain-evil-demiurge-of-the-triple-entente-and-world-war-1/


blaming each other for a situation is typically freudian... there is no difference between blaming the parents and whatever power that be. Yet many on here would say its all about the jews... wasnt freud a jew?

good job sigmund, your thinking is pervasive throughout the west now... you were smart enough to understand how to frame psyches though by just exploiting man's inherent inner fears to no end.

[Neuro]

That's a clarification? It is totally incomprehensible! And there appear to be no relation to anything in the thread...

[Jerrylynnb]

I still hope to have an expanding effect on Singular_me.

Is it only the military you object to? Or do you object to any maintenance of deadly force, such as firearms? If you acquiesce to the possession, and expertise with, firearms by individuals, then, how does that differ from a community organizing a militia, a police force, or, dare I say it, an ARMY?

The organization of a group of armed men, in uniform, is a mere extension of an individual, or a family, arming themselves as a precaution against armed criminal groups who would abuse, and even kill, them if they remained unarmed and helpless.

Surely, Singular_me, you do not insist that pacifism is to be practiced by honest, peace-loving persons FIRST, even before you can claim, with confidence and assurance, that all criminal groups have been disarmed and there is NO THREAT to peace-loving groups of any harm that would argue for these peace-loving groups to arm themselves as a precaution?

Once you allow that peace-loving folks can arm themselves, and practice in the use of deadly force, as a precaution, then, you have no choice, logically, than to allow that, should they be assaulted by criminals, they must be authorized, even by your own philosophy, to USE those arms in self-defense. War between nations is a mere extension of that notion - one group violates individuals of another group, refuses to negotiate justice for this abuse, and, the abused group takes up arms in the pursuit of justice.

Unless you have it all worked out to where peace-lovers can actually live without any need for self-defense, then you are not making logical sense, but, are just stamping your feet like a small child who is upset because he has to "eat his veggies", or "take a switching".

I won't press this any further, Singular_me, unless you stop, take a serious look at the plenitude of criminals and criminal groups running wild in the world (throughout ALL HISTORY), and face the harsh facts that living in peace sometimes requires hunting down and dealing with criminals using DEADLY FORCE.

To reduce this question to actual harsh historical facts, ponder the predicament the Austrians were in after a Serbian jew murdered thier visiting leader AND HIS WIFE in broad daylight and walked around free to brag about it, under the protection of the Serbian authorities who themselves maintained an army prepared to use deadly force against ANY AUSTRIAN who attempted to make an arrest for this murder? How were the Austrians to react to the support, both in material AND armed men, the Serbians recieved from the Russians, who were more aligned by blood to Serbians (both of slavic origins) than to the germanics? Are you actually claiming that the Austrians were supposed to just forget about the multiple murders? Take a moment to ponder this question, both in this particular instance, and in GENERAL for any situation where a crime has been committed with defiance for any notion of justice, and, deal with it like an adult who thinks things through, and, doesn't just continue blindly promoting pacifism. OK?