Log in

View Full Version : Celeb Bono Partners with Monsanto, G8, to Biowreck Africa



mick silver
16th November 2015, 02:31 PM
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/celeb-bono-partners-monsanto-g8-biowreck-africa
Celeb Bono Partners with Monsanto, G8, to Biowreck Africa








StumbleUpon
95.5K









Posted on:
Friday, June 1st 2012 at 1:45 am
Written By:
Rady Ananda (http://gold-silver.us/gmi-blogs/drum4peace)

http://cdn.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/ckeditor/greenmedinfo/images/bono-monsanto-shill-300x197.jpg
Rady Ananda
Food Freedom News (http://foodfreedomgroup.com/2012/05/29/u2-bono-monsanto-africa/)
Last year, at the G8 Summit held at Camp David, President Obama met with private industry and African heads of state to launch the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/18/fact-sheet-g-8-action-food-security-and-nutrition), a euphemism for monocultured, genetically modified crops and toxic agrochemicals aimed at making poor farmers debt slaves to corporations, while destroying the ecosphere for profit.

And Bono, of the rock group U2, is out shilling for Monsanto (http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2012/05/bono-again.html) on this one.

It's phase 2 of the Green Revolution. Tanzania, Ghana, and Ethiopia are the first to fall for the deception, with Mozambique, Cote d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso and other African nations lining up for the "Grow Africa Partnership," under Obama's "Global Agricultural Development" plan.
In Obama Pitches India Model of GM Genocide to Africa (https://willyloman.wordpress.com/2012/05/20/president-obama-pitches-cfr-plan-looks-to-bring-the-india-model-of-gm-genocide-to-africa/), Scott Creighton writes:
But African civil society wants no part of this latest Monsanto aligned 'public private partnership.' Whatever will the progressives do now that their flawless hero has teamed up with their most hated nemesis to exploit an entire continent like they did to India not that long ago?

With a commitment of $3 billion, Obama plans to 'partner up' with mega-multinationals like Monsanto, Diageo, Dupont, Cargill, Vodafone, Walmart, Pepsico, Prudential, Syngenta International, and Swiss Re because, as one USAID representative says 'There are things that only companies can do, like building silos for storage and developing seeds and fertilizers.'
Of course, that's an outrageous lie. Private citizens have been building their own silos for centuries. But it's true that only the biowreck engineers will foist patented seeds and toxic chemicals on Africa.

Creighton continues:
Bono says that there has to be a 'public private partnership' in order to get this done and that they are going to be using the ideas of the African people and farmers. Really? This is what the African farmers say to that...

'We request that: – governments, FAO, the G8, the World Bank and the GAFSP reconsider their promotion of Public/Private Partnerships which, as they are now conceived, are not suitable instruments to support the family farms which are the very basis of African food security and sovereignty.' African Civil Society Organizations (http://kofic.s3.amazonaws.com/126/2251/African-Civil-Society-Declaration.pdf)

I wonder if that could be any clearer. They don't WANT the public private partnerships involved in this process.... It's not enough that huge mega-corporations are bleeding the nations of Africa dry by sucking the valuable mineral resources out of their hills. No. As Bono says (http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2012/05/bono-again.html) about the development in Africa:

'They're future consumers for the United States. The president is talking business. This is good. It's a whole new development paradigm today. The old donor/recipient relationship... it's over.'

Written By:
Rady Ananda (http://gold-silver.us/gmi-blogs/drum4peace)
http://cdn.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/ckeditor/greenmedinfo/images/bono-monsanto-shill-300x197.jpg
Volatility (https://attempter.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/african-wannsee-conference-or-bono-parties-with-monsanto/) chimed in:
The history of corporate agriculture and its 'Green Revolution' is a perfect example of the unfulfilled promises, and therefore proven lies, of corporatism. What was the Green Revolution? With a huge one-off injection of fossil fuels, and building upon ten thousand years of agronomy, corporate agriculture temporarily increased yields within the monoculture framework.
But, in the Green Revolution, writes Volatility:








The soil is stripped of all nutrition and zombified by ever-increasing applications of synthetic fertilizer. Monoculture is ever more dependent on the increasing application of ever more toxic herbicides and pesticides. Deployment of GMOs escalates these vulnerabilities. Factory farms can exist only with ever increasing use of antibiotics. All these systems are extremely tenuous, vulnerable, not robust, not resilient. They're all guaranteed to collapse. Hermetic monoculture, and industrial agriculture as such, is one big hothouse flower which requires perfect conditions to survive....
[T]he Green Revolution was a scam to use cheap fossil fuels to increase monocrop yield, drive tens of millions off the land, and use the stolen land and food to render food temporarily artificially cheap for Western consumerism.
Like with Monsanto's Bt cotton deployed in India, at first yields improved and farmers profited. Now, however, according to a leaked Advisory (http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/Business/Ministry-blames-Bt-cotton-for-farmer-suicides/Article1-830798.aspx) from the Minister of Agriculture obtained by the Hindustan Times last month:
Cotton farmers are in a deep crisis since shifting to Bt cotton.... In fact cost of cotton cultivation has jumped...due to rising costs of pesticides. Total Bt cotton production in the last five years has reduced.
The Advisory definitively links farmer suicides to debt-enslavement enabled by the synthetic food model spawned by Monsanto, Dupont and other ecocidal corporations: "The spate of farmer suicides in 2011-12 has been particularly severe among Bt cotton farmers."

That's not all the harm wrought by the petrochemical synthetic ag industry, as this 2012 superweed map by the University of Wisconsin shows:


http://cdn.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/ckeditor/greenmedinfo/images/monsanto-superweeds-map2012-xuw.jpg
Over half of US states are now plagued by agrochemically-induced superweeds (http://www.motherjones.com/tom-philpott/2011/07/monsanto-superweeds-roundup). An industry sponsored study (http://www.freedoniagroup.com/brochure/28xx/2877smwe.pdf) of pesticide use predicts that by 2016, nearly a billion pounds of these toxic chemicals will be poured on US soils

mick silver
16th November 2015, 02:33 PM
Bono ... again

For being a good little spokesman for the globalist thieves, Bono gets another payoff that maybe could make him the richest musician (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2012/05/bono-facebook-ipo.html) on the planet.


Not much new here (http://video.msnbc.msn.com/mitchell-reports/47478561/#47478561). Just another example of social engineering to get us to support the rape of Africa.....all for the children of course. Bono is now shilling for Monsanto (http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/05/18/private-companies-helping-to-front-funds-for-african-food-development) and friends and partners with Hillary (http://www.c-span.org/Events/C-SPAN-Event/10737430797/) and Obama (http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/25055/2012/05/18/g8_summit_obama_boosts_african_agriculture_6_billi on.html). He works the crowd and shows us how selling

mick silver
16th November 2015, 02:35 PM
Private Companies Helping to Front Funds For African Food DevelopmentFood security aid is uncertain amid Eurozone crisis, and private companies are stepping in.
By Danielle Kurtzleben (http://www.usnews.com/topics/author/danielle-kurtzleben) May 18, 2012 | 3:20 p.m. EDT + More

(https://twitter.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft.usnews.com%2Fa1E720%3Fsrc =usn_tw&via=usnews&text=Private%20Companies%20Helping%20to%20Front%20 Funds%20For%20African%20Food%20Development)
(https://plus.google.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft.usnews.com%2Fa1E720%3Fsrc =usn_gp)
(https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Ft.usnews.com%2Fa1E720%3F src=usn_fb)







(http://www.reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft.usnews.com%2Fa1E720%3Fsr c=usn_rd&title=Private%20Companies%20Helping%20to%20Front%2 0Funds%20For%20African%20Food%20Development)
(http://www.stumbleupon.com/badge/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft.usnews.com%2Fa1E720%3Fsrc=usn_ su)
(http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Ft.usnews.com%2Fa1E720%3Fsrc=usn_l i&title=Private%20Companies%20Helping%20to%20Front%2 0Funds%20For%20African%20Food%20Development&summary=Food%20security%20aid%20is%20uncertain%20a mid%20Eurozone%20crisis%2C%20and%20private%20compa nies%20are%20stepping%20in.%20&source=U.%20S.%20News)



Music star Bono, representatives from big agribusiness, and the leaders of developing countries gathered in Washington Friday for the announcement of a new agreement, under which private companies will contribute $3 billion toward food security in Africa. The aid has the potential to ease some of the suffering of continent's poorest people. But the agreement is a small fix for a sizable problem that is increasingly difficult for G8 countries to solve.
[Read about a video game that lets you take on unemployment.] (http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/2012/05/17/new-video-game-takes-on-the-challenge-of-being-unemployed.html)
"A lot of governments are looking at their domestic fiscal challenges and are reluctant to renew their commitments" to food security aid, says Gregory Adams, spokesperson for international aid organization Oxfam. While G8 countries work to solve their budgetary problems, private companies including Monsanto, Dupont, Cargill, and Vodafone have agreed to contribute $3 billion toward the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, in an effort to lift 50 million people out of poverty over the next 10 years. The initiative is largely aimed at helping African farmers produce and sell their crops.
The agreement comes in advance of the G8 summit at Camp David, where President Obama and other global leaders will meet to discuss both food security and the Eurozone crisis. The economic turmoil in Europe could hinder some countries from further contributing toward food security. Some European nations contributed toward the three-year, $22 billion commitment made after the 2009 G8 summit in L'Aquila, Italy.

President Obama alluded to this difficulty Friday in his remarks announcing the agreement.
"I know some have asked, in a time of austerity, whether this New Alliance is just a way for governments to shift the burden onto somebody else. I want to be clear: The answer is no," Obama said. "As President, I can assure you that the United States will continue to meet our responsibilities, so that even in these tough fiscal times, we will continue to make historic investments in development."
[See why economists still don't understand the causes behind persistent unemployment.] (http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/2012/05/15/even-economists-cant-decide-the-cause-of-high-unemployment.html)
"We give President Obama credit for indicating this morning that the U.S. is going to sustain its commitment," says Adams. "The U.S. has a leadership role to play in that regard, and we're very supportive of the U.S. for doing that, but we need to hear the rest of the G8 stand up."
Three billion dollars over 10 years may help, but the scale of that giving is "completely different" from what G8 countries contributed in the past, says John Ruthrauff, director of international advocacy at InterAction, an alliance of organizations that works in international development.
To make that $3 billion investment worthwhile, he says, it will take plenty of work and expertise to back it up.
"It's not just money. It's help with infrastructure. marketing, housing, a whole lot of things that have to be done for small holder farmers to up their productivity and availability of markets." says Ruthrauff. "The question is: Can they be creative enough to actually go do that?"
Ruthrauff is confident that the potential is there if there is enough will to accompany it.
"Certainly the companies can do it, I believe, if they put in the resources of person power to actually get the work done and not just write a check and say 'that's all we have to do this year.' it needs to be both," says Ruthrauff. "If solving hunger was easy we would have done it a long time ago," he adds.
Danielle Kurtzleben is a business and economics reporter for U.S. News & World Report. Connect with her on Twitter at @titonka or via E-mail at dkurtzleben@usnews.com.

Cebu_4_2
16th November 2015, 03:10 PM
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fl.yimg.com%2Fea%2Fimg%2F-%2F140115%2Fsonny_bono_politician_19dbkds-19dbkgh.jpg%3Fx%3D450%26q%3D80%26n%3D1%26sig%3D33V I53q4wmVAZOqqvZVBQw--&f=1

Shami-Amourae
16th November 2015, 03:19 PM
I support this.


Africa needs more vaccines too.


...For humanitarian reasons.
LOL

singular_me
16th November 2015, 05:59 PM
shami, the same is being done to the whole planet

there is'nt ANY difference between races on that level

immutable Natural Law of Correspondence at work

when one allows others being harmed, and dont stand up, it is like neglecting that one's whatever limb in injured, as a result the gangrene spreads.

mick silver
17th November 2015, 03:18 PM
make him eat the shit , I bet he would stop taking money for nothing

Shami-Amourae
17th November 2015, 03:22 PM
there is'nt ANY difference between races on that level


Eugenics is good.

Dysgenics is bad.


If you feed 1 million hungry African kids you create 10 million starving African kids.

Africa was much better with stoneage tech. White civilization was the worst thing that ever happened to Africans.


Before
http://jonssonjourney.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IMGL09272.jpg

After
http://www.africanstarvingchildren.org/mm5/graphics/00000001/img_poverty-children.jpg