PDA

View Full Version : Non-Aggression Principle is Bullshit



Shami-Amourae
20th November 2015, 05:33 AM
Exactly, non-aggression is not an option when you are actively guilt-tripped into suicide of your own race...

The non-aggression principle is a LARPy belief that's not possible in a world dominated by Jews, Muslims, and various Shitskin flavors who wants GibsMeDat. It's a belief that only works if everyone follows it in a perfect world. It sounds good on paper just like Communism.

Communism works
People just need to stop being greedy


Anarchism works
People just need to stop being violent





You can't do it when the White race has been trained from birth to be suicidal and take it up the ass from anyone outside of their group because Muh Feels.

No shocker that the non-aggression principle was formulated by two Merchants: Ayn Rand and Murray Rothbard. Goyim eat this shit us.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle

"Yes goy. Don't be aggressive and wipe out the ones who will destroy you if you don't destroy them first."

That's seriously fucking gay. When you say it, Merchants rub their hands and Muslims scream "Allah Snackbar!" Enemies of the White race know there's no consequences for them fucking us up, so they do it with impunity.

Everyone takes what they want by force but you. Your interests, and then your race's interests should come first. That's just fucking nature.



How is the “right” to property that the libertarian axiom depends on established?
How could hierarchy in human relationships ever be prevented without resorting to a hierarchical anti-hierarchy police agency of some sort?
How does pollution work in a world with the NAP?
How does over fishing/hunting work in a world with the NAP?
The Amerindians followed the NAP. How did that work out for them?

Shami-Amourae
20th November 2015, 01:48 PM
Related:
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?84461-The-Sick-Glorification-of-Non-violence

Shami-Amourae
11th February 2016, 02:57 PM
What do?
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1453/15/1453159808567.jpg

Shami-Amourae
11th February 2016, 03:03 PM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1438/03/1438032668806.jpg

Shami-Amourae
20th March 2016, 08:51 PM
Recent discussion thread:
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/68186558 (http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/68186558)

palani
21st March 2016, 04:03 AM
The invader comes in offering peace. It is the invaded that resorts to war.

I expect the U.S. invaded Iraq and Afghanistan offering the natives peace and they were intelligent enough to not want any part of it.

International Law is Law between Christian nations. This is not U.N. law as that is styled 'private international law' or law agreed to between member nations. But then wars between so-called Christian nations have been pretty brutal too under International Law. Throwing other religions into the mix just complicates matters exponentially.