View Full Version : Flight of the A-10 Warthog
mick silver
22nd November 2015, 12:04 PM
http://www.military.com/video/aircraft/attack-and-fighter-aircraft/flight-of-the-a-10-warthog/4175012834001
midnight rambler
22nd November 2015, 01:31 PM
The A-10, the world's most efficient and prolific spreader of *depleted* uranium.
Jerrylynnb
22nd November 2015, 06:58 PM
My old win2k system won't play that video format - is there one in plain ole' ordinary youtube?
Glass
22nd November 2015, 07:29 PM
this might be it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0KY6MJ-dEQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0KY6MJ-dEQ
Jewboo
22nd November 2015, 07:39 PM
My old win2k system won't play that video format - is there one in plain ole' ordinary youtube?
Firefox with Adobe Flash Player works fine on both.
midnight rambler
22nd November 2015, 08:05 PM
Let's all celebrate the widespread broadcasting of TONS AND TONS of *depleted* uranium! YEA!!!
Glass
22nd November 2015, 08:10 PM
Let's all celebrate the widespread broadcasting of TONS AND TONS of *depleted* uranium! YEA!!!
heard you the first time. No one is celebrating, are they?
midnight rambler
22nd November 2015, 08:18 PM
heard you the first time. No one is celebrating, are they?
I love airplanes however the A-10 represents pure evil since all its cannon ammo is DU.
7th trump
22nd November 2015, 08:56 PM
Let's all celebrate the widespread broadcasting of TONS AND TONS of *depleted* uranium! YEA!!!
Mean while the soviets have polluted the oceans and ground with all their deserted bases leaving oil seeping in the oceans and radiation dumping into the atmosphere.
There a literally hundreds of military rotting ships littering the coasts. Not to mention thousands of aircraft. The scale of russia's military arms build up over several decades polluted the environment 100 fold more than the US.
And russia uses DU as well...so dont kid yourself. And they probably have stockpiles 50 times more than we do and use cheap labor to make it.
7th trump
22nd November 2015, 08:59 PM
I love airplanes however the A-10 represents pure evil since all its cannon ammo is DU.
You hate the A10 because russia doesnt have such an aircraft to do what the A10 can and does.
Anyone with half a brain knows its not the aircraft.
I love the A10 because it literally destroys anything in it path. No tank can withstand its firepower.
Love watching an A10 shred a soviet tank like a 223 go through warm butter.
Gee I wonder how midnight is going to put a jewish spin on this?
midnight rambler
23rd November 2015, 02:58 AM
a 223
Here we have the clueless moron who bought rifles chambered for .223 rather than 5.56 'cause he's a know-it-all and therefore doesn't have any need for researching anything. lol
Glass
23rd November 2015, 03:39 AM
US Army Admits Dumping Tons of Poisons, Nerve Gases, and Radioactive Waste in the Oceans for decades
In an alarming piece of news courtesy of the Newport News Daily Press, we find the Army dumped chemical weapons at sea for decades, and some of it is now a toxic sludge poisoning all of us in more ways than we can imagine. Even though a select few have known for years the Army was disposing of chemical weapons in ways not healthy for any of us, we are told "records obtained by the Daily Press show that the previously classified weapopns-dumping program was far more extensive than had been suspected."
The Army now admits it dumped 64 MILLION pounds of nerve and mustard gas agents, 400,000 chemical filled bombs, landmines, and rockets, and more than 500 TONS of radioactive waste into the seas. This is a disaster beyond description, and affects every living thing on Earth.
The original story only broke due to clam dredging off the NJ coast last summer that pulled up three WWI artillery shells filled with black sludge mustard gas which subsequently injured three bomb disposal technicians, one burned seriously. We are told:
These weapons virtually ring the country, concealed off the coast of at least 11 states -- 6 on the East coast, 2 on the Gulf coast, and California, Hawaii, and Alaska. Few, if any, state officials have been informed of their existence.
The chemical agents could pose a hazard for generations. The Army has examined a few of its 26 dump zones, but not in the last 30 years. The Army can't say exactly where all the weapons were dumped from WWII to 1970. Army records are sketchy or missing, or were destroyed. More dumpsites probably exist. The Army hasn't reviewed WWI-era records, when ocean dumping of chemical weapons was common,
From 2006. Daily KOs (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/2/183960/-)
I remembered AJ going on about 64 million somethings.
Glass
23rd November 2015, 03:42 AM
PigPen and Waldo
Shortly after the OP wrote GUTS N' GUNSHIPS, he inadvertently discovered an audio recording of his involvement in the extraction of American forces that were about to be overrun by thousands of enemy troops. The following is a small excerpt of the actual radio transmissions.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuuDWd8SL7A
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuuDWd8SL7A
Jerrylynnb
23rd November 2015, 04:03 AM
How does the A10 hold up against enemy fighter jets?
brosil
23rd November 2015, 07:15 AM
How does the A10 hold up against enemy fighter jets?
If the button pushers in the F-15s and such are doing their jobs, the A-10 should never have to worry about them. Much like the B-17s of WW2, you have to blow a lot of pieces/parts off an A-10 to bring it down.
7th trump
23rd November 2015, 08:11 AM
Here we have the clueless moron who bought rifles chambered for .223 rather than 5.56 'cause he's a know-it-all and therefore doesn't have any need for researching anything. lol
Says a lot about your jewish character trait doesn't it?
You have no clue about me, but your going to character assassinate anyway....how jewish of you. Did you learn that in the jewish russian public schools?
All my AR's chambered in 223 are built to fire 556 as well.
So when they eventually ban all 556 my AR's will not be useless.
In fact, I have Ar's chambered in other calibers just in case they ban other ammo but midnight knew this and yet continued with his jewish character assassination.
7th trump
23rd November 2015, 08:17 AM
If the button pushers in the F-15s and such are doing their jobs, the A-10 should never have to worry about them. Much like the B-17s of WW2, you have to blow a lot of pieces/parts off an A-10 to bring it down.
The A10 is one sonofabitch to bring down. This is why the commy obama has to use politics to bring it down (moth ball it). The A10 is a deadly flying titanium tank thats destroying the coward ISIS and gives the russians a brown streak in their shorts when they hear one coming. The russian tanks fear the A10. Theres not a tank the russians have that can take a hit from the A10 and survive.
monty
23rd November 2015, 09:34 AM
The A10 is a deadly flying titanium tank thats destroying the coward ISIS and gives . . .
Really? :{y
Do you have some proof?
midnight rambler
23rd November 2015, 01:18 PM
You CONTINUE to prove what a total moron you are! lol
All my AR's chambered in 223 are built to fire 556 as well.
Wrong. If the barrel is stamped ".223" then that barrel has a .223 chamber (SAAMI specs) one should only be firing .223 rounds in a barrel chambered for .223, 5.56 NATO is a NO GO in a .223 chamber. If a barrel is stamped "5.56" (NATO specs) then one can shoot either .223 Remington OR 5.56 NATO in a barrel chambered for 5.56 NATO. The .223 Wylde chambering was introduced as a 'compromise' chambering. If one is shooting 5.56 NATO in a barrel marked .223 then they are a complete dumb ass.
russia doesnt have such an aircraft to do what the A10 can and does.
This is truly hilarious. The Russians have something which performs far better than the A-10, the Su-25 which has been in service since '81. The Su-25 was designed from the ground up to operate on the front lines, which means it can operate from unimproved, improvised runways (read: dirt roads) unlike the A-10 DU spreader which needs a paved runway for it's delicate undercarriage. Additionally, the A-10 'hits the wall' at 400 knots and will NOT fly any faster while the Su-25 can fly at Mach speeds when without a load on dry power (no afterburner, it doesn't even have afterburners). Best of all, the Russians don't poison the environment with *depleted* uranium like spewed from the A-10.
Su-25 hit by a Stinger from Uncle Satan's Al-CIA-duh! makes it back to base -
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0803/sergey25/Su%2025/Image3.jpg
midnight rambler
23rd November 2015, 01:19 PM
Really? :{y
Do you have some proof?
Yes, whatever Uncle Satan's Pentagram propagates. Believe it. Dump does.
Horn
23rd November 2015, 01:27 PM
It was genius design for its time, if you'd ever seen them doing practice runs from a distance they are amazing creatures.
These days of handheld surface to air missile shields or TOW kinda scraps the idea of need for any air or tank power or maybe only to act as drone draw dummy fire until you can park a munitionized C-130 around them.
boogietillyapuke
23rd November 2015, 01:34 PM
Won't do anything any better than an old AH-1 or A-7. Want to kill tanks? Give me an Apache and I'll pop a Hellfire up your ass and won't even consider utilizing the chain gun, DU or not.
The purpose of any of this equipment is to "KILL PEOPLE and BREAK SHIT. They all work equally well.
The MIC needs to sell shit to make money. The only reason to even consider retiring the A-10 is to enhance the pockets of the MIC and the best politicians that your money can buy.
Speaking as an A&P Mechanic, they probably haven't even approached their allotted airframe lifetime.
7th trump
23rd November 2015, 03:13 PM
You CONTINUE to prove what a total moron you are! lol
Wrong. If the barrel is stamped ".223" then that barrel has a .223 chamber (SAAMI specs) one should only be firing .223 rounds in a barrel chambered for .223, 5.56 NATO is a NO GO in a .223 chamber. If a barrel is stamped "5.56" (NATO specs) then one can shoot either .223 Remington OR 5.56 NATO in a barrel chambered for 5.56 NATO. The .223 Wylde chambering was introduced as a 'compromise' chambering. If one is shooting 5.56 NATO in a barrel marked .223 then they are a complete dumb ass.
This is truly hilarious. The Russians have something which performs far better than the A-10, the Su-25 which has been in service since '81. The Su-25 was designed from the ground up to operate on the front lines, which means it can operate from unimproved, improvised runways (read: dirt roads) unlike the A-10 DU spreader which needs a paved runway for it's delicate undercarriage. Additionally, the A-10 'hits the wall' at 400 knots and will NOT fly any faster while the Su-25 can fly at Mach speeds when without a load on dry power (no afterburner, it doesn't even have afterburners). Best of all, the Russians don't poison the environment with *depleted* uranium like spewed from the A-10.
Su-25 hit by a Stinger from Uncle Satan's Al-CIA-duh! makes it back to base -
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0803/sergey25/Su%2025/Image3.jpg
Guess thats why my AR's are stamped 556.
also why is it that you only show damage to russian aircraft that WWII aircraft can withstand?
Are you scared of something comrade rusky?
Not one russian aircraft can fly on one wing and make it home like the F15 has.
midnight rambler
23rd November 2015, 04:02 PM
Guess thats why my AR's are stamped 556.
Like we can believe anything you say, right? YOU are the one who initially stated you had "two .223s". You also said the Russians had nothing comparable to the A-10 and I proved you wrong - the Russians have the Su-25 which can operate IN THE DIRT and in extreme conditions at the front with the foot soldiers.
The Russians have the Su-34 fighter-bomber (can stay on station for TWELVE hours, can act as a mini-AWACS platform, has assysmetrical 3D thrust vector control [only the Russians have aircraft with 3D TVC]) which the west has NOTHING comparable. And BTW, the Russians have the only interceptor that can shoot down cruise missiles (the MiG-31BM, top speed 2.83 Mach).
http://i.imgur.com/bMP6G16.jpg
fly on one wing and make it home like the F15 has.
lol Only your beloved Zionist faggot pals are incompetent enough to fly into each other.
mick silver
23rd November 2015, 04:10 PM
a 10 one bad tools for troops on the ground in a fight for life , you know they are there
midnight rambler
23rd November 2015, 05:00 PM
The cannon fodder strictly serving the interests of IsraHell gets the DU rained down upon them. Nice. How loving.
7th trump
23rd November 2015, 07:01 PM
The cannon fodder strictly serving the interests of IsraHell gets the DU rained down upon them. Nice. How loving.
Just watched a video of the russian airforce dropping phosphorous on ISIS......seems your beloved communist dictator isnt all what hes cracked up to be.
Hes a criminal in your own words you used against Israel when they used it against the Palestinians.
You keep inserting your foot in your mouth everytime.....like the old saying goes. Feed them enough rope to hang himself....and thats you midnight!
So far everything you said against the US and Israel is slowly proving your a liar and commy propagandist.
7th trump
23rd November 2015, 07:18 PM
Like we can believe anything you say, right? YOU are the one who initially stated you had "two .223s". You also said the Russians had nothing comparable to the A-10 and I proved you wrong - the Russians have the Su-25 which can operate IN THE DIRT and in extreme conditions at the front with the foot soldiers.
The Russians have the Su-34 fighter-bomber (can stay on station for TWELVE hours, can act as a mini-AWACS platform, has assysmetrical 3D thrust vector control [only the Russians have aircraft with 3D TVC]) which the west has NOTHING comparable. And BTW, the Russians have the only interceptor that can shoot down cruise missiles (the MiG-31BM, top speed 2.83 Mach).
http://i.imgur.com/bMP6G16.jpg
lol Only your beloved Zionist faggot pals are incompetent enough to fly into each other.
Hahaha...your Su-25 doesnt do what the A10 can do. Going mach speed isnt a factor in what the A10 can do. You cant do what the A10 can do going mach speed.
The A10 isnt swept wing and why would you need an A10 to be front line when you have f117's, F18's and F22's dropping guided munitions to take out targets before the A10 gets there. The A10 is a ground troop support and its world known for it job. The Su-25......who heard of this plane before?....nobody has!
That two seater fighter.....why?
Guess you need two people to fly it......electronics must be third world and human error is now twice the risk.
What ever commy...........the US is decades ahead of russia and always will be playing catch up.
midnight rambler
24th November 2015, 03:49 AM
Just watched a video of the russian airforce dropping phosphorous on ISIS
So you're unhappy your fellow Satan worshiping, Zio-cock-sucking shitbirds are getting a willy pete treatment? I always suspected you were an IS supporter.
boogietillyapuke
16th January 2016, 03:30 PM
Not going anywhere after all: http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/news/a18985/a-10-warthog-retirement-plans-stalled/
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.