PDA

View Full Version : White House tries to shift terrorism debate from refugees to guns



Cebu_4_2
24th November 2015, 08:37 AM
White House tries to shift terrorism debate from refugees to gunshttp://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/261123-white-house-tries-to-shift-terror-debate-from-refugees-to-guns

The White House on Monday opened up a new fight with Republicans in Congress, challenging them to pass laws to prevent suspected terrorists from purchasing firearms.

After suffering a defeat with a House vote to clamp down the flow of Syrian refugees, White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Congress’s response to the Paris terror attacks has been misguided.

“Members of Congress are prepared to allow those individuals who are already in the United States and are suspected of having links to terrorism of going and purchasing a firearm,” he told reporters.

“I think that is a pretty clear indication that Republicans in Congress are more interested in playing politics and more scared of the NRA than they are concerned about doing the right thing for our national security,” he said, referring to the National Rifle Association.

The White House is bolstering calls from Democrats to pass legislation aimed at blocking suspected terrorists from buying guns, including from Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

“As people are sitting around the Thanksgiving table, as I’m sure they will all across the country, I hope that is a question that will be raised,” Earnest said. “I’m not even sure why that’s even controversial.”

Past efforts to pass similar legislation have failed thanks to staunch opposition from gun-rights groups and GOP lawmakers.

Jennifer Baker, a spokeswoman for the NRA, last week said that it is "appalling that anti-gun politicians are exploiting the Paris terrorist attacks to push their gun-control agenda and distract from President Obama’s failed foreign policy."

"The NRA does not want terrorists or dangerous people to have firearms. Any suggestion otherwise is offensive and wrong," Baker said.

The gun proposal is unlikely to have legs in the GOP-controlled Congress. Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) demurred when asked about the issue last week.

"We are just beginning this process of reassessing all of our security stances,” he said.

The White House is also looking to shift attention away from the refugee issue, which has been a political albatross for President Obama.

The House voted in overwhelming, bipartisan fashion for the proposal to freeze the Syrian refugee program despite a last-minute lobbying push from top White House officials.

Earnest chided lawmakers who cited the White House’s flat sales pitch as their reason for voting for the bill.

“So, they took a vote on a significant national security issue that they didn’t understand?” he asked. “Is that right? I haven’t heard anybody say that, but that would be news.”

agnut
24th November 2015, 10:22 AM
So let me get this straight.

They welcome thousands of refugees among whom there may be terrorists, into our country whom we have been attacking and bombing for many years.

They give them tax free money to live on that came from our personal income without our consent.

And now they want gun control, aka taking away our Second Amendment rights, because these so called refugees might buy guns and terrorize us in our own homes.

Oh, and let me add that we are not to talk disparagingly toward these refugees. What happened to our First Amendment rights ?

Let me ask a few questions here that has been troubling me since this whole refugee situation began.

Why didn’t we have the refugees sent to other Muslim countries rather than to our own neighborhoods ? The Arab world is huge and they can afford to take care of their own, can’t they ? They refused to take their refugees in but rather send them all around the world.

Even if we did allow these refugees into our country, why didn’t we set them up in areas where they would not be mixing with our native citizens ?

Isn’t this just history repeating itself ? Remember the Trojan Horse ?



I don’t feel that I am being represented but rather am being resented.

It seems to me that democracy has become the tyranny of the majority by way of giving government aid to those whose vote cancels out my vote. The more aid given from our taxpayer dollars, the more my vote becomes irrelevant.

This may be yet another reason that Donald Trump is so popular. He is a problem solver rather than a problem creator. He has my vote, a vote of hope for the future in which I will be respected as an American citizen with all the protection that the US Constitution and Bill of Rights promise.

Best wishes,

Agnut

Frederick Douglas stated, "Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will. Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."
"On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and complete narcissistic moron."
-H.L. Mencken
Oppressing everyone to avoid oppressing anyone is the egalitarian ethos gone mad. - Daniel Greenfield

You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body. -C.S. Lewis