PDA

View Full Version : sovereign citizen gets 10 years for retaliating against judge, prosecutor



cheka.
6th December 2015, 12:12 PM
https://www.fbi.gov/sanantonio/press-releases/2015/sovereign-citizen-sentenced-to-10-years-in-federal-prison-for-retaliating-against-a-federal-judge-and-prosecutor

In Houston today, a federal judge sentenced 45–year-old Tyrone Eugene Jordan, a sovereign citizen residing in Houston, to ten years in federal prison for retaliating against a federal judge and prosecutor by filing false liens announced United States Attorney Richard L. Durbin, Jr., and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Special Agent in Charge Perrye K. Turner, Houston Division.

In addition to the prison term, United States District Judge Gray H. Miller ordered that Jordan be placed on supervised release for a period of three years after completing his prison term.

On July 15, 2015, a federal jury convicted Jordan of three counts of retaliation against a federal officer or employee by false claim. Evidence and trial testimony revealed that in October 2014, Jordan filed a fraudulent lien—a Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Financial Statement—with the Texas Secretary of State which claimed that a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of Texas owed the defendant $6,534,500.

Furthermore, in January 2015, the defendant knowingly filed two separate fraudulent documents (Affidavit of Obligation Commercial Lien) with the Harris County Clerk’s Office—Real Property Department claiming that the federal prosecutor mentioned above and a U.S. District Judge in the Southern District of Texas were Lien Debtors to the defendant. Testimony also revealed that the defendant filed the fraudulent documents against the victims in retaliation for their roles as prosecutor and sitting judge in a prior criminal case involving the defendant.

“Jordan’s sole purpose was to harass these public servants for having done their jobs. Such malicious harassment of public officials is unacceptable. Public officials should not have to suffer such harassment simply because they work to uphold the law,” stated United States Attorney Richard L. Durbin, Jr.

In April 2010, Jordan was convicted of conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to commit alien smuggling following a jury trial in Corpus Christi. He was subsequently sentenced to 63 months in federal prison followed by three years of supervised release. On March 9, 2015, Jordan was arrested by federal authorities for violating terms of his supervised release, namely, filing two false liens. In addition to the prison term assessed for retaliating against a federal judge and prosecutor, Judge Miller ordered that Jordan serve ten months in federal prison for violating his supervised release conditions stemming from his April 2010 federal conviction.

This case was investigated by the FBI together with the United States Marshals Service for the Southern District of Texas. Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Wannarka prosecuted this case on behalf of the Government.

palani
6th December 2015, 12:24 PM
To be considered a lien there must be a court action. This includes a docket, evidence of due process such as notice and opportunity to inquire followed by FAULT and DEFAULT.

This is ALL liens. Even the fake ones issued by the federal government that they choose to call NOTICE OF LIEN, a form of quasi-lien.

Ares
6th December 2015, 01:38 PM
He also involved the UCC in the claim process.

Claim = Common Law

Anything UCC = Commercial

You cannot mix the 2 or you will end up like this guy.

Glass
6th December 2015, 05:48 PM
yes a lot of people do this type of process, however it does need an actual judgement.

To do the process upto and including the "default" and then not seek a judgment could results in this situation. If the man had gone for a Default Judgment somewhere, he would not have been in that position IMO. You can get default judgements without even going in to a court room. You can get them done in chambers. I can't recall the term for that.

In aus you can get a JP to give you a default judgement, well, more correctly They have the authority to. Getting them to do it might be a different story. If they are unfamiliar, and many are they may not know they can do it or they may fear doing it, if it is against someone in their role such as a Judge. Better to go against the people rather than the job. Man to man.

I have done this process myself against business debtors. So it was commercial not private. Did not need to go into court. Stopped someone leaving the country while in debt. I've done it privately as well but did not pursue it to judgement.