The establishment is very worried about trump

[EE_]

Just saw a segment on Fox with Shepard (the faggot) Smith, angry, saying that all the establishment is against, attacking Trump on his comment on Muslims and want him to go away, because they are worried about their jobs and keeping the status quo. I think Shep didn't realize he was making a stronger case to vote Trump. What a faggot.

I'll post the video when it comes up

[StreetsOfGold]

He just might become our FIRST Jesuit (educated) President
I still think Hilary will be INSTALLED but a stinking JesuTWIT brainwashed tool like Trump might do as well


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJCG8JnKd-o

[JohnQPublic]

He just might become our FIRST Jesuit (educated) President...

Sorry to burst your bubble, but Bill Clinton, Trained by Jesuits at Georgetown University

[Shami-Amourae]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZV28mrQF9Y

[Cebu_4_2]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZV28mrQF9Y

Washington (CNN)Donald Trump's statement that Muslims should be banned from entering the United States "disqualifies" him from being president, the White House spokesman said Tuesday.

"The fact is what Donald Trump said yesterday disqualifies him from serving as president," White House press secretary Josh Earnest said in Tuesday's press briefing. For a White House administration to so heavily weigh in on an opposing party's nominating contest is a highly unusual step.

Earnest noted first that every president must take an oath to "preserve, protect and defend" the U.S. Constitution, and thus, he said, Trump would not qualify.

The GOP front-runner on Monday released a statement calling for the U.S. to refuse entry of foreign Muslims. His proposal was met with widespread criticism, including from several candidates in his own party.

But Earnest had harsh words for the GOP as a whole, too, saying all GOP presidential candidates have signed a pledge to support whoever is the eventual nominee.

"For Republican candidates for president to stand by their pledge to support Mr. Trump, that in and of itself is disqualifying," Earnest said. "The question now is about the rest of the Republican Party and whether or not they're going to be dragged into the dustbin of history with him. And right now the current trajectory is not very good."

Earnest cited the election of House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, who a reporter said (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/01/us/politics/much-of-david-dukes-91-campaign-is-now-in-louisiana-mainstream.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0) once joked he was like white supremacist David Duke "without the baggage," and a leaked Republican Senate campaign memo (http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/02/politics/donald-trump-senate-gop-memo/) instructing candidates how to ride voters' support for Trump.

He also noted that House Speaker Paul Ryan Tuesday said he would vote for Trump if he were the GOP nominee -- though he omitted the fact that Ryan unequivocally rebuked (http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/08/politics/paul-ryan-trump-comments-not-who-we-are-as-a-party/index.html) Trump's comments and said they were "not who we are as a party" and unconstitutional.

The White House spokesman on Tuesday also called Trump a "carnival barker."
"The Trump campaign for months now has had a dustbin of history-like quality to it," Earnest said.
Secretary of State John Kerry also rebuked Trump's comments.

"I would simply say that nondiscrimination and equal treatment are a pillar of not just American values but of our immigration and our admission policies in this country and the State Department remains totally committed to treating all religions with respect and without discrimination," Kerry said during a press briefing in Paris.

He added, "As I travel around the world, it is clear to me and how both our friends and our adversaries watch and listen to the discourse in the U.S., and I believe that comments such as those that we just heard are not constructive -- and I would say that is putting it diplomatically."

And Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook on Tuesday said -- without hitting the Republican front-runner by name -- that Trump's comments put U.S. national security at risk.

"Anything that bolsters ISIL's narrative and pits the United States against the Muslim faith is certainly not only contrary to our values but contrary to our national security," he said, using another name for ISIS.

He also said that there are "many men and women in uniform today of Muslim faith who are serving this country patriotically."
The U.S. is working with Muslim nations right now, Cook noted. "We want to, in essence, take the fight to ISIL with the help of Muslims around the world."

[Cebu_4_2]

Interesting game changer here, Lets go see what Trump is saying.

Looks like he is out, going to run as independant.

WASHINGTON — Donald Trump not only continues to lead the Republican presidential field in a new USA TODAY/Suffolk University Poll. The overwhelming majority of his supporters also say they would vote for him if he bolted the GOP and ran as an independent.

[Cebu_4_2]

Donald J. Trump (https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/?fref=nf)1 hr ·



A new poll indicates that 68% of my supporters would vote for me if I departed the GOP & ran as an independent http://www.usatoday.com/…/poll-trump-cruz-rubio-c…/76948760/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/12/08/poll-trump-cruz-rubio-clinton-sanders/76948760/)

[Shami-Amourae]

B-b-b-but elections don't matter.


I-I-I-I can't support Trump since his kids are married to Jews.


H-h-h-h-he's a Jesuit!

:rolleyes:

[Neuro]

Donald J. Trump (https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/?fref=nf)

1 hr ·



A new poll indicates that 68% of my supporters would vote for me if I departed the GOP & ran as an independent http://www.usatoday.com/…/poll-trump-cruz-rubio-c…/76948760/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/12/08/poll-trump-cruz-rubio-clinton-sanders/76948760/)
Nice! Perfect for Hillary. Just like Ross Perot was perfect for Bill...

[Shami-Amourae]

Front page:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1449/60/1449608236029.png

[Shami-Amourae]

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1422/93/1422939964936.png

[madfranks]

Donald J. Trump (https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/?fref=nf)

1 hr ·



A new poll indicates that 68% of my supporters would vote for me if I departed the GOP & ran as an independent http://www.usatoday.com/…/poll-trump-cruz-rubio-c…/76948760/ (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/12/08/poll-trump-cruz-rubio-clinton-sanders/76948760/)

68% of his current supporters means that 32% wouldn't support him anymore. That's not enough for him to win, but it's sure enough to make sure the repubs don't win.

[Shami-Amourae]

Anything that destroys the Republican party I'm all for.

[hoarder]

It's just a show for the goyim. Trump is a jew. Don't get addicted to hopium.

[Shami-Amourae]

You guys think to hard.

You don't realize how retarded the ruling class really are.

[Jewboo]

Anything that destroys the Republican party I'm all for.



http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/8-25-2015/o7TOxn.gif

http://blogs.jwatch.org/hiv-id-observations/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/06/Republican-Presidential-Contenders.jpg

[Shami-Amourae]

http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/8-25-2015/o7TOxn.gif

http://blogs.jwatch.org/hiv-id-observations/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2015/06/Republican-Presidential-Contenders.jpg

They're gate keepers for a real Nationalist leader.

We may have one in Trump. Either way he's Triggering them all, so I can't help but support the guys.

[midnight rambler]

Sorry to burst your bubble, but Bill Clinton, Trained by Jesuits at Georgetown University

BJ was also a Rhodes Scholar as well.

[midnight rambler]

Nice! Perfect for Hillary. Just like Ross Perot was perfect for Bill...

You have NO idea what you're talking about. I was there.

[Shami-Amourae]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CVvBo0nUkAAdT_S.jpg

[Shami-Amourae]

BTW I was a Nigress today.

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1449/60/1449609628319.jpg

[Cebu_4_2]

How can they say he isn't qualified for a statement made while campaigning?

I call BS... but another good publicity stunt.

[Shami-Amourae]

How can they say he isn't qualified for a statement made while campaigning?

I call BS... but another good publicity stunt.


The Ruling Class are Leftists.

Leftists are children.

[Cebu_4_2]

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-unites-democrats-republicans-plan-bar-muslims/story?id=35632600

He is supposed to be live with Barbara Walters at 6:30 EST, haven't got the live link yet.

This could be it: http://abcnews.go.com/Live?stream=3

WTF? The forum is editable now?

High Fives for John!!! --H H--

[JohnQPublic]

Trump spoke as a candidate. Once elected (if elected) he would have to turn that into a policy. What Cruz is doing is making a lw (in Congress) that says that they will not take any refugees from and country that has significant influence form ISIS. Trump = rhetorical candidate; Cruz = legislative actor.

[Cebu_4_2]

Trump spoke as a candidate. Once elected (if elected) he would have to turn that into a policy. What Cruz is doing is making a lw (in Congress) that says that they will not take any refugees from and country that has significant influence form ISIS. Trump = rhetorical candidate; Cruz = legislative actor.

Trump can't legislate anything at the moment. Cruz is already on the inside. I do like Cruz and am glad he is rising in the polls but Trump would still be like a spider dropped into your ice cream cone.

PS the forum is still jacked up... dammit.

[EE_]

Watch this clip with Shep...does it make you want to vote against the "establishment"?
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4652114389001/donald-trump-rejects-criticism-of-proposal-to-ban-muslims/?playlist_id=2694949843001#sp=show-clips

Trump has beat them and has been vindicated for just about everything he's said. Watch a couple more incidents like in CA happen soon, where Muslims/ISIS are involved, and we'll see guys like Shep have his piecockhole shut.

[StreetsOfGold]

Sorry to burst your bubble, but Bill Clinton, Trained by Jesuits at Georgetown University

No bubble burst. I never researched this regarding former presidents but no surprise since the JesuTWITS have long since taken root in America for the NWO takeover.

[Cebu_4_2]

If anyone can get a link for the Barbara Walters interview it would be appreciated. Probably have to watch it after the fact. I don't like those cause they might be fvcked with but will settle with what I can get.

[Cebu_4_2]

No bubble burst. I never researched this regarding former presidents but no surprise since the JesuTWITS have long since taken root in America for the NWO takeover.


Is it possible for one to be a Jesuit AND a Jew?

[Shami-Amourae]

No bubble burst. I never researched this regarding former presidents but no surprise since the JesuTWITS have long since taken root in America for the NWO takeover.


Don't forget homo-capensis!

http://extraterrestrialcontact.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/1-mitres-coneheads-akhenaten.png

:rolleyes:

[midnight rambler]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17q4fZrsUGo

[Cebu_4_2]

7:40 minutes only?

Thanks BTW

[midnight rambler]

7:40 minutes only?

Thanks BTW

That video has glitches, it's outtakes from the source, ABC Evening Nooz. Waiting for another video to be posted to jootube.

[Cebu_4_2]

sound stops at 2:05 - 2:30, not sure if it's significant tho.

[midnight rambler]

This is strictly the Baba Wawa interview portion of the ABC Evening Nooz -


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJn2DH7r-oM

[Cebu_4_2]

He looks tired... I am surprized he continues. A few more blasts against him he might stand down. Sharp as a tack but the media beheading him is taking a quick toll. Hope he gets a good nights rest.

[EE_]

How Donald Trump Plays the Media
December 08, 2015

RUSH: Some days they just tee me up. Some days are just too easy. Question: Has Loretta Lynch arrested Trump yet? Well, isn't that the kind of stuff she said she's gonna start arresting people for? Why hasn't he been arrested? Greetings, my friends. Welcome. Rush Limbaugh, EIB Network. Great to have you here. Telephone number, if you want to be on the program today, 800-282-2882. E-mail address, ElRushbo@eibnet.com.

Everybody, everybody -- now Paul Ryan has joined in -- everybody condemning Donald Trump. The conventional wisdom is that Donald Trump's insane, he's a lunatic, crazy. This is dangerous. This is bad. It's un-American. It's unacceptable. He's gotta go.

originalExcept he's leading. A big problem. Even Dingy Harry -- and, by the way, for all of you Republicans getting on this gravy train condemning Trump, I want to show you what good it's doing you. Dingy Harry: "Donald Trump is standing on the platform of hate, and, I'm sorry to say, hate that the Republican Party has built for him."

You Republicans, you can denounce Trump all day, all week, all month, and the Democrat Party and the media are still gonna say you laid the table for it. You can condemn Trump all you want, but it is not going to buy you any love or respect or admiration from the Drive-By Media and the Democrats. Now, folks, the conventional wisdom is that Trump is scum, that Trump is a reprobate, that Trump is dangerous, that Trump is obscene, Trump's insane, Trump's a lunatic, Trump's dangerous, Trump's got to go. Why join in with that phrase? Why join that crowd? We never fall in with conventional wisdom here.

I want to look at this in a little different way, as I'm wont to do, and I want to look at the politics of this. And I want to remind you late last week, middle part of last week and end of late last week, I started what I intended to be a pretty in-depth discussion of how it is that Donald Trump owns the media. I made the point to you last week that that is the one factor that has upset everything else in this presidential campaign, despite what you might think about the Republican Party being the opposition party to the Democrats, the Democrats being the opposition to the Republicans.

Inside the Beltway, the Washington establishment, the establishment is aligned and unified on a number of things, Republicans and Democrats alike. And one of those things on which they're aligned is that the Drive-By Media is an acceptable, coequal branch of what they do. They accept the media as, for lack of a better term, the great equalizer. The media is always the institution that makes or breaks people. If the media wants to make somebody, they can, and it's allowed. If the media wants to take somebody out, it's allowed, and they try and oftentimes get away with it.

You do not hear the Republican Party condemning the media much. And the reason for this is that inside the Beltway within the Washington establishment, the elite, the ruling class, whatever you want to call it, the media is a coequal member. And members of the media are coequal. That fact and the fact that Trump now owns the media -- and this episode is just more proof of it -- is one aspect that has everything else in this campaign turned upside down. The great equalizer, the media, the great level, the media, the institution relied on to keep things within the guardrails, as the establishment wants it, can't do it. And that's why there's panic, and that's why there's outrage, and that's why there is anger.

Evidence of what I'm saying is found here in the Washington Post: "Donald Trump Has Gotten More Nightly Network News Coverage Than the Entire Democratic Field Combined." Let me repeat that you to. "According to the Tyndall Report, which tracks the airtime that the various flagship news programs on NBC, CBS and ABC dedicate to a variety of stories, the 2016 election has received 857 minutes of combined coverage, through Nov. 30. With a month to go, that's already the second biggest total of any pre-election year in the last seven presidential cycles."

Donald Trump, Republican front-runner Donald Trump is the most covered candidate in the race. In fact, Donald Trump alone has gotten more airtime -- 234 minutes out of the 857 minutes are Trump's -- he has gotten more airtime than the entire Democrat field, the chosen field of the media. Trump has gotten more time combined than all the Democrats in the race. Hillary Clinton is the second most covered candidate at 113 minutes. Trump is twice the coverage that Hillary has gotten. Why? Why is Trump still in the race? This is not the first outrageous thing he said, by far. It's not even the most outrageous thing he said, depending on who you ask.

Why is Donald Trump still a candidate? Why hasn't anybody been able to force him out? Why hasn't anybody been able to humiliate him? Why hasn't anybody been able to destroy him? Why hasn't anybody -- and by anybody, I mean, the media, 'cause that's who both parties rely on to do this. Why can't the media touch the guy? He's given them all kinds of ammo. If anybody else says what Trump says, and they're history, they're shamed, they're humiliated, they are forever forgotten, and they have gotten so low they could never recover from it.

Trump is leading the Republican presidential primary. Why can't they touch him? Why do they keep covering him? Why don't they just ignore him? They can't. And that and therein lies something fascinating. Trump has direct access to his voters, his supporters, the American people. Trump has direct access to people around the world. I've got the Trump Stack of Outrage today. It's comical. It's predictable. It's sameness. Even I, El Rushbo, am blamed for it on t
he BBC, if you can believe that. Yeah. I'm responsible. You know why? Because I have been saying this kind of thing 25 years or more. Trump is just picking up where I left off, according to the BBC.

Meanwhile, I've never said anything like anything Trump says. But despite it all they can't take him out. They can't stop covering him. They can't humiliate him. They can't embarrass him. They can't diminish his support. They're powerless, and this has them in a panic. The media that can make-or-break anybody cannot touch Trump, and every time they try, all they do is make him bigger. They can't explain this. They are frustrated to no end, and so are both political parties who rely on the media to be the great equalizer in all of this.

Nothing's working. No matter what Trump says, the media is there, and every member of the media is there. Every network, every camera, every microphone is there. Last Friday night Trump was in Raleigh, North Carolina. Reuters lied. Reuters even tried lying to destroy Trump. They ran a story claiming that Trump's performance and his appearance were shut down by Black Lives Matter protesters. MSNBC ran with it.

I happened to see it, a little blurb on Apple news while I was sitting at home minding my own business, bothering nobody. I said, "Wait a minute. Why isn't this all over the place? This is what everybody been dreaming of: Trump humiliated, Trump shut down, Trump forced to leave the stage. Why haven't I heard this anywhere?" The reason: It didn't happen. Reuters made it up. People who were there have now testified to what happened. They can't even get rid of Trump by making up bad stuff about him.

But what really frustrates them, is they can't get rid of Trump by simply repeating what he says. Trump has direct access. Trump did not need the media in order to be heard, in order to have his message flavored and formed for proper receipt by the audience. He has direct access. He doesn't need them. He can go right over their heads. It may be true to say that the Drive-By Media has covered politics, for better or worse, in a predominant way for years and years and years -- and that's the horse-race aspect.

Who's leading? What do the polls say? Who's losing? Who's surprised by who's winning? Who's surprised by who's losing? But it's the horse-race angle. And that's completely backfired on 'em. Their primary technique, their primary way of reporting these campaigns and thereby shaping the outcome of them is backfiring totally on them. There is a deep panic, I believe, in the Drive-By Media. Because, in their world, in their mind, they control the horse race.

They are the ones that are the greatest factor in determining how people vote or what they say in polls. And the fact that they are having absolutely zero impact on Donald Trump is blowing their minds. Donald Trump has a more loyal audience than the media has at this point, which is also what this is showing. And it is causing a lot of people in the establishment -- the elites, the ruling class, whatever you call 'em both parties, the Washington crowd.

It's causing them to come unglued and unhinged, while they think it is Trump who is unhinged and coming unglued. Now, let's look at the politics of this. Take the events of the recent past, last week, last month, last six months. And then add the presidential to those events. Those events have been dominated by Islamic terrorism and illegal immigration and the failing US economy and the absolute disaster that is Obamacare. On the Democrat side, I don't have any recognition of any of that.

And on the Republican side, after Trump's statement here, there's only one guy. I'm just addressing the politics of this, folks. Forget substance, comments, whatever. It's the politics of this. There's only one guy in all of the presidential campaign occupying the position he occupies. Everybody else sounds the same. Everybody else... I don't care if it's Hillary or if it is Carly Fiorina. I don't care if it's Bernie Sanders or if it's John Kasich. They all sound the same. What do they all do? They are condemning Donald Trump.

Donald Trump is condemning ISIS. Donald Trump is condemning illegal immigration. Donald Trump is condemning a weak, stupid United States leadership. Over here, everybody else is not. They are condemning Donald Trump. In a political sense, Donald Trump, leading the presidential campaign, is the sole occupier of his position. He has no competition for it. Just in a political sense, that's pretty brilliant positioning to me. He owns the media. They can't stop talking about him.

And what's it costing him?

Zero.

He's not spending a dime.

What did we hear yesterday? The Jeb Bush super PAC, Rise to Rise or whatever it is that Murphy is running. They're preparing $75 million. To do what? Take out all the Republicans! Except Trump. They're not gonna attack Trump. I don't know if it's gonna happen, but it was a rumored strategy. Mike Murphy, well-known Republican consultant who loses more than he wins, said (summarized), "To get Jeb Bush back in the race we gotta take out every other Republican.

"So we're gonna take $75 million in our super PAC and we are going to destroy Rubio and Christie and Kasich. We're gonna destroy Fiorina. We're gonna destroy Carson. Everybody, except Trump. And when it's all over, we will have a two-man race, Jeb and Trump, and then it'll not be a contest." The theory says that when it's just Jeb and Trump, the vast majority of intelligent, reasonable, responsible Republican primary voters will choose -- dadelut dadelut dadelut -- Jeb. Now, if they try that... Big "if."

If they try that, and if they succeed, they have just destroyed, Rubio, Carson, Fiorina, the whole field. Not just for this campaign, for the future. 'Cause it's a negative campaign they're gonna run. And they're not gonna touch Trump. None of the $75 million will touch Trump. You would think all of it would be used to take out Trump. But none of it's gonna be. Why? It's not that they want the last two standing to be Jeb and Trump. It's that they know they can't.

They have listened to this program and they've heard Trump supporters call here and say, "There's nothing Trump can say that will make me abandon him." Now, about what Trump is saying, about these "outrageous, unacceptable comments for which he should be put in jail." I guess -- and again I ask -- Why is what's her name, Loretta Lynch, not pursuing him, investigating and arresting him? I mean, she just said, this is the kind of stuff, the DOJ is gonna go after people for.

RUSH: This latest Donald Trump episode is a glittering, glaring example of how he is playing the media like a Stradivarius. And I tell you, folks, for all of you people who have complained and whined and moaned about the media over the years, and how unfair they are to Republicans and how unfair that makes the whole process and, "What are we gonna do?" You need to be studying Donald Trump. I don't care whether you think what he says is outrageous or wrong or whatever. That's the wrong way to look at this right now.

This latest quote/unquote "outrage" from Trump is a perfect example of how he plays the media, how he knows exactly what to do and how to do it to own their attention and airtime. He says things that he knows will drive them crazy. He says things over and over that he knows will drive them insane, and then when they go insane, he doubles down on it and drives them even crazier. He also knows that his audience is in on what he is doing.

He knows that a lot of Americans agree, to a certain extent, with things that he says. He also knows he's the only one reaching those people. And then he sits back and watches (no doubt with a huge smile) the media cover what he says over and over and over and over again. Then they analyze it over and over and over, and they talk about it over and over and over again. He's confident that a lot of his voters are gonna be able to strip away the bombast and be able to get to the nuts and bolts of what he's saying, the kernel of truth of what he's saying.

In the meantime, he ends up occupying political positions exclusively that many support.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/12/08/how_donald_trump_plays_the_media

[EE_]

Hypocritical Jews Denounce American Patriot Donald Trump
December 8, 2015 Realist Report Leave a comment

The outrageous hypocrisy of the organized Jewish community knows no bounds, as regular readers here are well aware.

Immediately after American patriot and leading GOP presidential contender Donald Trump called for Muslims to be barred from entering the United States, an array of Jewish organizations and ethnic activists denounced the man as a “nativist” and a “racist,” calling his entirely rational proposal contrary to America’s “fundamental values.”

The Jewish Telegraph Agency recently reported:

Jewish groups blasted Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump for his proposal to block all Muslims from entering the United States.

“A plan that singles out Muslims and denies them entry to the U.S. based on their religion is deeply offensive and runs contrary to our nation’s deepest values,” the Anti-Defamation League said in a statement Monday evening hours after Trump, a real estate billionaire and reality TV star, issued his call.

“In the Jewish community, we know all too well what can happen when a particular religious group is singled out for stereotyping and scapegoating,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, ADL’s CEO. “We also know that this country must not give into fear by turning its back on its fundamental values, even at a time of great crisis.”

The American Jewish Committee’s director of policy, Jason Isaacson, noted the timing of Trump’s statement, which called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States,” coincident with the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah.

“As Jews who are now observing Hanukkah, a holiday that celebrates a small religious minority’s right to live unmolested, we are deeply disturbed by the nativist racism inherent in the candidate’s latest remarks,” Isaacson said. “You don’t need to go back to the Hanukkah story to see the horrific results of religious persecution; religious stereotyping of this sort has been tried often, inevitably with disastrous results.”

Trump in his news release alluded to the massacre in San Bernardino, California, last week of 14 people by a couple apparently radicalized by the Islamic State terrorist group. […]

Other Jewish groups condemning the comments included J Street, Bend the Arc, the National Jewish Democratic Council, the Israel Policy Forum, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism and JAC, a Jewish political action committee.

Needless to say, the Jewish state of Israel, an explicitly Jewish state every single one of these Jewish organizations and ethnic activists totally support, will most certainly not be accepting Muslim “refugees” from the Middle East. Massive Third World immigration, “diversity,” and “multiculturalism” are public policies and concepts only enforced and sanctioned in the West (at the behest of Jews, of course).

Assuming the official narrative of the San Bernardino shooting is accurate, placing a moratorium on immigration from the Middle East is an entirely rational public policy to pursue. Such a policy would be contrary to the long-running Jewish agenda to flood America and Europe with millions of non-White hostile aliens, which is why the organized Jewish community is apoplectic after hearing Trump’s proposal.
http://therealistreport.com/hypocritical-jews-denounce-american-patriot-donald-trump/

[mick silver]

polls are for fools

[EE_]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq0YfUAoF7U

[EE_]

Trump has really ignited a firestorm with this one. I have the feeling he's going to be vindicated again and in the near future.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwbXIPl4cyM

[EE_]

All Rupert's employees denounce Trump and Rupert comes out and agrees with Trump?

Rupert Murdoch on Trump's Immigration Stance: "Complete Refugee Pause" Makes Sense
by THR Staff 12/8/2015 1:28pm PST

The GOP presidential candidate shared the media mogul remarks about Muslims to his more than five million followers.

Rupert Murdoch spoke out about Donald Trump's recent remarks calling for a "complete shutdown" of Muslims entering the United States.

"Has Trump gone too far?" tweeted Murdoch, without answering his own question. "Regardless, public is obsessed on radical Muslim dangers, Complete refugee pause to fix vetting makes sense."


The media mogul's implication that the U.S. should have a pause on allowing refugees into the country while it "fixes vetting" is not a new idea. The House of Representatives recently voted to ban Syrian and Iraqi refugees from entering the U.S., calling for tougher screening measures.

However, Trump's request to bar all Muslims from entering the country has been met with indignation and disdain.

Hours after his initial post, Murdoch said he was not endorsing Trump, just supporting his idea.


Murdoch backing Trump on Tuesday was somewhat unusual as the media mogul has been critical of the GOP candidate in the past, especially on his immigration views. In July, Murdoch said Trump was "wrong" about his outlook on undocumented immigrants.

"Mexican immigrants, as with all immigrants, have much lower crime rates than native born. Eg El Paso safest city in U.S. Trump wrong," Murdoch tweeted.


Murdoch's remarks were in response to Trump claiming undocumented immigrants from Mexico are mostly criminals. The mogul didn't stop there, he posted a second tweet further challenging Trump's assertions.

"So FBI says 267000 illegal aliens incarcerated. Who are the other two million presently incarcerated?" Murdoch tweeted.


Still, it appears Murdoch is in agreement with Trump on his recent ban proposal. About an hour after it was posted, Trump re-tweeted Murdoch's message to his more than five million followers.

Trump was blasted even more when he expanded on the ban proposal at a rally in South Carolina Monday night.

"We can be politically correct and be stupid, but it's going to get worse and worse," Trump said. Trump was interrupted at least twice by hecklers during the speech.

Meanwhile, the Philly Daily News likened Trump to Adolf Hitler on the publication's Tuesday cover for the ban announcement. The New York Times published an editorial titled "Bizarre Responses to a Plea for Reason," criticizing Trump for his call to ban Muslims from entering the U.S.

"Donald Trump, a bigot without foreign policy experience, showed that there is nothing he won’t say or support to sow hatred," the editorial board wrote.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rupert-murdoch-trumps-immigration-stance-846983

[Jewboo]

He looks tired...

69 year-old geezer.

[Cebu_4_2]

polls are for fools

ownes jews.
Trump

[Cebu_4_2]

Nice formatting.

[Neuro]

Is it possible for one to be a Jesuit AND a Jew?
You mean like Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit order?

[Neuro]

BTW I was a Nigress today.

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1449/60/1449609628319.jpg
Those racist whites! 69% will not approve of having their culture enriched by Moslems...

[Cebu_4_2]

Donald J. Trump (https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/?fref=nf)10 hrs ·


Prior to the end of the year, I will be traveling to Israel. I am very much looking forward to it!

[Neuro]

Donald J. Trump (https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/?fref=nf)

10 hrs ·


Prior to the end of the year, I will be traveling to Israel. I am very much looking forward to it!
Mazel Tov Trumpstein!

[hoarder]

You mean like Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit order?They started all the secret societies and orders that they hide behind. All those entities serve as blame absorbers.

[Neuro]

They started all the secret societies and orders that they hide behind. All those entities serve as blame absorbers.
Yes, we have noticed here. Further it is the perfect way to infiltrate the power structure of Goyim. Jesuit order for the Catholic Church. Masonry for industrialists, politicians and judicial system. Nowadays the NGO's full of bleeding heart liberals seems to be the preferred way! And anyone who isn't seems to flock around Trumpstein!

[Camp Bassfish]

68% of his current supporters means that 32% wouldn't support him anymore. That's not enough for him to win, but it's sure enough to make sure the repubs don't win.

And I have wondered all along if it's intentional. Go off the rails crazy so the democrats get in again.

[hoarder]

Voter support has nothing to do with winning. The majority of states have jew controlled electronic voting machines.

[Cebu_4_2]

Voter support has nothing to do with winning. The majority of states have jew controlled electronic voting machines.


Weren't the democraps swapping suitcases with votes in them when RP was running? I remember reading that repugnicans can't challange voter fraud, or even mention it.

Here it is...

In case you are wondering why Republicans never call Democrats on the flagrant voter fraud that appears to worsen with each presidential election, this (http://judicialview.com/Court-Cases/Civil-Procedure/Democratic-National-Committee-v-Republican-National-Committee/10/201975) could be one reason:


In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance.


Section (e) of the decree clearly sets PC race privilege politics above the principle of one man, one vote. The RNC agreed to
refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose.


To translate into English, this means that fair elections shall be conducted only in districts without a substantial nonwhite population. This is why there were multiple districts in Cleveland and Philadelphia where not a single vote was recorded for Mitt Romney (http://moonbattery.com/?p=20985). In racially correct Democrat strongholds where whites have been largely displaced, our liberal rulers don’t even have to pretend that the results aren’t rigged.
We have abandoned our democratic republic in favor of a race-based banana republic.

[EE_]

Bloomberg Politics Poll: Nearly Two-Thirds of Likely GOP Primary Voters Back Trump's Muslim Ban
More than a third say it makes them more likely to vote for him, according to an online PulsePoll conducted by Purple Strategies on Tuesday.
John McCormick
December 9, 2015 — 1:02 PM EST

Almost two-thirds of likely 2016 Republican primary voters favor Donald Trump's call to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the U.S., while more than a third say it makes them more likely to vote for him.
Those are some of the findings from a Bloomberg Politics/Purple Strategies PulsePoll, an online survey conducted Tuesday, that shows support at 37 percent among all likely general-election voters for the controversial proposal put forward by the Republican front-runner.

“We believe these numbers are made up of some people who are truly expressing religious bigotry and others who are fearful about terrorism and are willing to do anything they think might make us safer,” Doug Usher, who runs polling for Washington-based Purple Strategies, said in his analysis of the findings. "This indicates that, despite some conventional wisdom expressed in the last 48 hours, this is unlikely to hurt Trump at least in the primary campaign."
Read the poll questions and methodology here.

Support for Trump's proposal remains virtually unchanged even after voters are told both sides of the argument. On one side, they were told that “leaders from across the political spectrum have condemned this policy” as one that will make the U.S. “less safe by alienating the allies we need to fight ISIS.” They were also told that Trump has said it is needed until more is known about the threat and that the nation "cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in jihad."
When voters were provided with this additional information, support for the proposal remains essentially unchanged, with 64 percent of likely Republican primary voters saying they favor the idea. That includes 52 percent who say they strongly support the proposal.

After being told about the idea, 37 percent of likely Republican primary voters say it makes them more likely to support the billionaire real estate mogul, while 16 percent say less and 46 percent say it has no impact.
Among all likely general-election voters, including Democrats and independents, 18 percent say it makes them more likely to back Trump, while 33 percent say less likely and 44 percent say it has no impact.
While Trump has considerable strength among likely Republican primary voters, the survey shows weakness for him in a general election. Including all likely voters, 33 percent view him favorably and 64 percent unfavorably.

That's a worse favorability rating than President Barack Obama, who was at 51 percent favorable and 47 percent unfavorable in this survey. It's also worse than Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton, who is seen favorably by 45 percent and unfavorably by 52 percent of likely general-election voters.
Those with less education are more likely to be strongly supportive of Trump's Muslim proposal, with 34 percent of those without a college education feeling that way compared to 22 percent of those who do have a college education. Older voters, evangelical Christians, and whites are also more likely than the overall general election population to favor Trump's plan.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-12-09/bloomberg-politics-poll-trump-muslim-ban-proposal

[hoarder]

Weren't the democraps swapping suitcases with votes in them when RP was running? I remember reading that repugnicans can't challange voter fraud, or even mention it.

Here it is...

In case you are wondering why Republicans never call Democrats on the flagrant voter fraud that appears to worsen with each presidential election, this (http://judicialview.com/Court-Cases/Civil-Procedure/Democratic-National-Committee-v-Republican-National-Committee/10/201975) could be one reason:


In 1982, the Republican National Committee (“RNC”) and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) entered into a consent decree (the “Decree” or “Consent Decree”), which is national in scope, limiting the RNC’s ability to engage or assist in voter fraud prevention unless the RNC obtains the court’s approval in advance.


Section (e) of the decree clearly sets PC race privilege politics above the principle of one man, one vote. The RNC agreed to
refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities in polling places or election districts where the racial or ethnic composition of such districts is a factor in the decision to conduct, or the actual conduct of, such activities there and where a purpose or significant effect of such activities is to deter qualified voters from voting; and the conduct of such activities disproportionately in or directed toward districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations shall be considered relevant evidence of the existence of such a factor and purpose.


To translate into English, this means that fair elections shall be conducted only in districts without a substantial nonwhite population. This is why there were multiple districts in Cleveland and Philadelphia where not a single vote was recorded for Mitt Romney (http://moonbattery.com/?p=20985). In racially correct Democrat strongholds where whites have been largely displaced, our liberal rulers don’t even have to pretend that the results aren’t rigged.
We have abandoned our democratic republic in favor of a race-based banana republic.They go to great lengths trying to hide the fact that they completely control the voting machines. There are some states that don't use them....yet.

[steyr_m]

He just might become our FIRST Jesuit (educated) President

I've been reading about the Jesuits and the Papacy having so much control over the world. I dunno, I'm just not seeing or buying it yet....

[Shami-Amourae]

I've been reading about the Jesuits and the Papacy having so much control over the world. I dunno, I'm just not seeing or buying it yet....

Look over here Goyim. It's actually Homo-Capensis! Loominaughty exposed!

Jewess Karen Hudes tells all to Gold/Silver community!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-TwoBPmJ3c

[Neuro]

I've been reading about the Jesuits and the Papacy having so much control over the world. I dunno, I'm just not seeing or buying it yet....
The only power the Jesuits have, belongs to those who delegated it. Loyola who founded the Jesuits was a Jew! Pope Francis, the first Jesuit pope seems particularly good at following Zionist agenda ...

[Neuro]

Look over here Goyim. It's actually Homo-Capensis! Loominaughty exposed!

Jewess Karen Hudes tells all to Gold/Silver community!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-TwoBPmJ3c
I stopped listening when she said Ferdinand Marco got 600,000 metric tons of gold from the Vatican...

[Shami-Amourae]

I stopped listening when she said Ferdinand Marco got 600,000 metric tons of gold from the Vatican...

I didn't think you'd actually listen. LOL.

Yeah, there's a bunch of Jews doing Disinfo pointing at all this stupid crap, yet never naming the Jew. It's either the Jews themselves doing it or someone working for a Jew, like Alex Jones.

[mick silver]

Yep, you heard that right. Trump was attacked by the very symbol of the United States of America.

The real estate mogul turned TV personality turned presidential wannabe was posing with the bird (http://time.com/4141783/time-person-of-the-year-runner-up-donald-trump-eagle-gif/) for Time "Person of the Year" issue. The photographer, Martin Schoeller, thought that having Trump hold a 27-year-old bald eagle named "Uncle Sam" would make for a nice photo.
Uncle Sam did not agree.

[singular_me]

keeping an eye on the ball rolling is key
-------------------------
Hillary’s Secret Weapon: Donald Trump
December 9, 2015
Patrick Henningsen
‘Is Donald J. Trump running a false flag campaign to help Hillary? This idea was originally floated as a Republican Party conspiracy theory back in August, but failed to gain any traction by virtue of Donald Trump’s abrupt surge in national GOP polling. That’s changing now, as reality is starting to dawn on The Donald Show.

The GOP has got a fundamental problem now. Presently, the Republican Party has its own hands half-tied – unable to fully distance themselves or condemn Trump’s recent call to ban all Muslims from entering the US, or even Trump’s somewhat disturbing call on Monday to “close down parts of the internet.”

The reason the GOP’s hands are tied is because Trump isn’t the only candidate invested in this litany of reactionary policy rhetoric in the GOP’s now legendary race to the bottom – as a still bloated field of presidential candidates rush to gather all the lost political souls before February, by pandering to the radical right and the remnants of a scattered Tea Party base.’.........

Whether or not Trump’s comic book-style candidacy is contrived and calculated to divide the party base, or just the Real Donald – might be up for debate, but there can be no debate about the end result – should Trump choose to run a third-party ‘Independent’. A Trump third-party run will split the Republican vote enough to all but guarantee a comfortable Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party presidential victory in the general election.

Today, Trump raised his big, gold Atlantic City-style Sword of Damocles over the GOP’s neck again:

“The people, the Republican party has been — the people have been phenomenal, the party I’ll let you know about that. And if I don’t get treated fairly, I would consider that. In fact they did a poll… where 68% of the people that were Republicans would follow Trump if I went independent,” Trump touted.

Trump is making no secret of this reality either, constantly war-gaming his options on Twitter, much to the dismay of a paralyzed Republican establishment…

http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/12/09/hillarys-secret-weapon-donald-trump/

[Neuro]

If Trump wins the republican nomination, most likely Hillary will win, because enough republicans are disgusted with him not to vote or even vote for Hillary. If he doesn't win the republican nomination, but decides to go third party, Hillary will win, just like Bill won 1992 when Ross Perot ran third party. Hillary's best chance to win is Trump. Not that the other Republican candidates would be any different than Hillary in any practical sense.

[hoarder]

In recent decades, the left right swing cycle has been 8 years/double terms, with the exception of Bush Sr. taking over the Reagan legacy. Although another 4 years of Democrats is a possibility, I think there's a greater probability that the Jews will place Trump in office to once and for all, discredit the values of his followers. His cult of personality would be useful in staging an all out war White against Muslim, thus diminishing the populations of both and creating a great void for them to fill.

[EE_]

If Trump wins the republican nomination, most likely Hillary will win, because enough republicans are disgusted with him not to vote or even vote for Hillary. If he doesn't win the republican nomination, but decides to go third party, Hillary will win, just like Bill won 1992 when Ross Perot ran third party. Hillary's best chance to win is Trump. Not that the other Republican candidates would be any different than Hillary in any practical sense.

That would be perfect to see the 'establishment' help Hillary win the presidency. Maybe the real people of this country will revolt and the republican party will be no more.

Right now the establishment politicians have egg on their face for not acknowledging Trump is the people's choice and that things/people have changed in this country.

People no longer like the establishment policies and the 'status quo'.

The establishment is too proud to admit they are out of touch with their voting base, which imo says, they are only in it for themselves.

[Neuro]

In recent decades, the left right swing cycle has been 8 years/double terms, with the exception of Bush Sr. taking over the Reagan legacy. Although another 4 years of Democrats is a possibility, I think there's a greater probability that the Jews will place Trump in office to once and for all, discredit the values of his followers. His cult of personality would be useful in staging an all out war White against Muslim, thus diminishing the populations of both and creating a great void for them to fill.
I think the Jews prefer to discredit the value of his followers while he is running. Queen Jezebel is in line for succession, he was hired for that purpose!

[Shami-Amourae]

If Hillary wins Nationalism will only grow and get more radicalized.

Win-win no matter what unless Jeb or some other Cuckservative gets into power.

[EE_]

If Hillary wins Nationalism will only grow and get more radicalized.

Win-win no matter what unless Jeb or some other Cuckservative gets into power.

It's time for the Gay Old Pervert party to be shut down and for a new party to emerge...a peoples party. It's time to send the Karl Rove's and Jeb Bush types packing.

The liberal party of perverts and socialism will end itself, probably with many heads on pikes.

[EE_]

In recent decades, the left right swing cycle has been 8 years/double terms, with the exception of Bush Sr. taking over the Reagan legacy. Although another 4 years of Democrats is a possibility, I think there's a greater probability that the Jews will place Trump in office to once and for all, discredit the values of his followers. His cult of personality would be useful in staging an all out war White against Muslim, thus diminishing the populations of both and creating a great void for them to fill.

How diabolical and evil!...and believable!

[singular_me]

nothing can stop the radicalization of the west at this stage but possibly being on a brink of a all out war with the middle east/russia/china/iran, etc that might ring the alarm bell in everybody's mind.

It is exponential, my dear watson

anybody aware of the exponential factor will think a 1000 times before engaging in any war, or even starting it. Once the trends take off, consequences are dire. The trend is approaching a a 2000 year old threshold.

[midnight rambler]

A Trump third-party run will split the Republican vote

That's just impossible to tell at this point. What if there's no 'Republican vote' to split?

[EE_]

They even rolled out Mohammad Ali to drool out a statement...

I'm not sure he was talking about Trump...he could have meant Israel? No one has used Islam to advance their own personal agenda, more then Israel.

Muhammad Ali Hits at Trump and 'Misguided Murderers' Sabotaging Islam
by M. ALEX JOHNSON

http://i.usatoday.net/communitymanager/_photos/game-on/2011/12/02/alix-inset-community.jpg
Like the champion fighter he is, Muhammad Ali took jabs Wednesday at "so called Islamic Jihadists" and those who would "use Islam to advance their own personal agenda."

"I am a Muslim and there is nothing Islamic about killing innocent people in Paris, San Bernardino, or anywhere else in the world," the former heavyweight champion of the world and peace activist declared in a statement to NBC News. "True Muslims know that the ruthless violence of so called Islamic Jihadists goes against the very tenets of our religion."

But the real target of Ali's roundhouse was Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump Israel.

The statement never mentions Trump by name — but its headline is "Presidential Candidates Proposing to Ban Muslim Immigration to the United States."

"We as Muslims have to stand up to those who use Islam to advance their own personal agenda," Ali said. "They have alienated many from learning about Islam. True Muslims know or should know that it goes against our religion to try and force Islam on anybody."

Ali's punch came just three days after Trump said on Twitter that he couldn't recall any great American Muslim athletes — even though he's met Ali several times.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/muhammad-ali-hits-trump-misguided-murderers-sabotaging-islam-n477351

[EE_]

Tell me again, who's using Islam to advance their own personal agenda?

1,000 US Rabbis sign letter to “welcome” Syrian Muslims to America

Posted by Ann Corcoran on December 4, 2015

The Washington Post is reporting the story here. The letter was gotten together by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (one of nine federal contractors which benefit financially from the resettlement of refugees to your towns and cities). We told you here and here that HIAS is pulling out all the stops to pressure Congress right now.

One of the 1,000 Rabbis signing the letter seeking more Syrian Muslim refugees for the US is Rabbi David L. Abramson. I was looking for someone from Maryland (Bethesda) and he was near the top of the list and that is the only reason I chose him to illustrate my post. Photo and bio here: http://shoreshhebrewhigh.org/faculty.html
HIAS has said it wants 100,000 Syrians to be admitted to the US before Obama leaves office, and we know that as of a few days ago 99% of the Syrians admitted in this fiscal year are Sunni Muslims.

The greater the number of Muslim immigrants admitted to the US the greater chance that someone like this poor Messianic Jew*** murdered in San Bernardino two days ago will die. (His wife says he died a martyr for his religion.)

Get this through your heads! Muslims are not going to love you more if you help them to migrate to the West!

Did HIAS tell the Rabbis the truth?

Before they signed, did HIAS tell the rabbis that 99% of those HIAS is resettling from Syria are Muslims?

Did HIAS tell them that the UNHCR is NOT focusing on religious minorities, but almost exclusively on Sunni Muslims for America?

Brigitte Gabriel at ACT for America is famous for saying that “moderate Muslims are irrelevant” because they don’t stand up to the extremists. This is going to sound harsh, but if you are a Jew who disagrees with HIAS and yet don’t stand up to them (or your rabbi who might be on this list), you are irrelevant too!

And to make it fair! As we pointed out here on Sunday, if your church is on this list and you don’t say anything, you aren’t only irrelevant, but complicit!

***See this whole article about those slaughtered at their annual Christmas party. I was struck by the diversity of the victims of the devout Islamic killers—many races, religions, sexes, are represented, no one was spared! They, and you, have one thing in common—you are all infidels!
https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2015/12/04/1000-us-rabbis-sign-letter-to-welcome-syrian-muslims-to-america/

[Neuro]

They even rolled out Mohammad Ali to drool out a statement...

I'm not sure he was talking about Trump...he could have meant Israel? No one has used Islam to advance their own personal agenda, more then Israel.

Muhammad Ali Hits at Trump and 'Misguided Murderers' Sabotaging Islam
by M. ALEX JOHNSON

http://i.usatoday.net/communitymanager/_photos/game-on/2011/12/02/alix-inset-community.jpg
Like the champion fighter he is, Muhammad Ali took jabs Wednesday at "so called Islamic Jihadists" and those who would "use Islam to advance their own personal agenda."

"I am a Muslim and there is nothing Islamic about killing innocent people in Paris, San Bernardino, or anywhere else in the world," the former heavyweight champion of the world and peace activist declared in a statement to NBC News. "True Muslims know that the ruthless violence of so called Islamic Jihadists goes against the very tenets of our religion."

But the real target of Ali's roundhouse was Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump Israel.

The statement never mentions Trump by name — but its headline is "Presidential Candidates Proposing to Ban Muslim Immigration to the United States."

"We as Muslims have to stand up to those who use Islam to advance their own personal agenda," Ali said. "They have alienated many from learning about Islam. True Muslims know or should know that it goes against our religion to try and force Islam on anybody."

Ali's punch came just three days after Trump said on Twitter that he couldn't recall any great American Muslim athletes — even though he's met Ali several times.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/muhammad-ali-hits-trump-misguided-murderers-sabotaging-islam-n477351
Are we supposed to believe that Muhamed Ali wrote that, or told someone to write that in his name?

[brosil]

Did anyone mention that what Trump proposed is completely legal under U.S. law and that law was used by Jimmy Carter to throw out Iranians in 1979?

[madfranks]

Did anyone mention that what Trump proposed is completely legal under U.S. law and that law was used by Jimmy Carter to throw out Iranians in 1979?

No, because emotional feelings crying racism trump sound logic and law.