Cebu_4_2
9th December 2015, 12:40 PM
Liberals say Trump’s plan for Muslims is ILLEGAL, but look what we just found…
While the president condemns Donald Trump for suggesting that maybe we might want to slow down the flow of potential Islamic terrorists into our nation by halting the influx of Muslims until we have better vetting systems in place, it turns out The Donald actually has the law on his side. (Of course I realize the irony of discussing “law” when we’re talking about Barack Obama, but bear with me…)
Tim Brown at Freedom Outpost astutely points out that we already have a law in place that bars the immigration of people who wish to overthrow our government, commit acts of sabotage – including murder – or teach or preach these ideas. Well isn’t THAT interesting? And it’s been around for more than 60 years.
The Immigration and Nationality Act, was passed June 27, 1952 and revised the United States’ laws regarding immigration, naturalization and nationality. It was originally passed to prevent Communists from entering the country, but check out the text and see if it doesn’t apply right now.
Section 313 states the following:
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(b) , no person shall hereafter be naturalized as a citizen of the United States-
(1) who advocates or teaches, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, opposition to all organized government; or
(3) who, although not within any of the other provisions of this section, advocates … the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, either through its own utterances or through any written or printed publications issued or published by or with the permission or consent of or under authority of such organizations or paid for by the funds of such organization; or
(4) who advocates or teaches or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches (A) the overthrow by force or violence or other unconstitutional means of the Government of the United States or of all forms of law; or (B) the duty, necessity, or propriety of the unlawful assaulting or killing of any officer or officers (either of specific individuals or of officers generally) of the Government of the United States or of any other organized government because of his or their official character; or (C) the unlawful damage, injury, or destruction of property; or (D) sabotage; or
(5) who writes or publishes or causes to be written or published, or who knowingly circulates, distributes, prints, or displays, or knowingly causes to be circulated, distributed, printed, published, or displayed or who knowingly has in his possession for the purpose of circulation, publication, distribution, or display, any written or printed matter, advocating or teaching opposition to all organized government, or advocating (A) the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the Government of the United States or of all forms of law; or (B) the duty, necessity, or propriety of the unlawful assaulting or killing of any officer or officers (either of specific individuals or of officers generally) of the Government of the United States or of any other organized government, because of his or their official character; or (C) the unlawful damage, injury, or destruction of property; or (D) sabotage; or (E) the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship; or
(6) who is a member of or affiliated with any organization, that writes, circulates, distributes, prints, publishes, or displays, or causes to be written, circulated, distributed, printed, published, or displayed, or that has in its possession for the purpose of circulation, distribution, publication, issue, or display, any written or printed matter of the character described in subparagraph (5).
Chapter 2, Section 212 says entry to the U.S. should be prohibited if the person belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the U.S. government by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
Well…as Brown points out, “The Koran and the Hadiths present Sharia and demand submission to Islam” which as we all know is antithetical to the foundation of our nation and the U.S. Constitution.
And Islamists have made it no secret they wish to expand their caliphate across the globe and enact strict Sharia Law.
Critics will call this a “religious test,” but if you pledge allegiance to a faith which demands you adhere to Sharia Law over and above the U.S. Constitution, why would you want to live here anyway?
It’s not a religious test; it’s a test of fealty to the laws of this land. This should be the measure of all who wish to immigrate to our shores.
And we’ve already passed a law to ensure it. But clearly under this administration, laws have little meaning unless they advance the progressive agenda.
http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/12/this-us-law-proves-trumps-plan-for-muslims-is-perfectly-legal/
While the president condemns Donald Trump for suggesting that maybe we might want to slow down the flow of potential Islamic terrorists into our nation by halting the influx of Muslims until we have better vetting systems in place, it turns out The Donald actually has the law on his side. (Of course I realize the irony of discussing “law” when we’re talking about Barack Obama, but bear with me…)
Tim Brown at Freedom Outpost astutely points out that we already have a law in place that bars the immigration of people who wish to overthrow our government, commit acts of sabotage – including murder – or teach or preach these ideas. Well isn’t THAT interesting? And it’s been around for more than 60 years.
The Immigration and Nationality Act, was passed June 27, 1952 and revised the United States’ laws regarding immigration, naturalization and nationality. It was originally passed to prevent Communists from entering the country, but check out the text and see if it doesn’t apply right now.
Section 313 states the following:
(a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 405(b) , no person shall hereafter be naturalized as a citizen of the United States-
(1) who advocates or teaches, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches, opposition to all organized government; or
(3) who, although not within any of the other provisions of this section, advocates … the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship, either through its own utterances or through any written or printed publications issued or published by or with the permission or consent of or under authority of such organizations or paid for by the funds of such organization; or
(4) who advocates or teaches or who is a member of or affiliated with any organization that advocates or teaches (A) the overthrow by force or violence or other unconstitutional means of the Government of the United States or of all forms of law; or (B) the duty, necessity, or propriety of the unlawful assaulting or killing of any officer or officers (either of specific individuals or of officers generally) of the Government of the United States or of any other organized government because of his or their official character; or (C) the unlawful damage, injury, or destruction of property; or (D) sabotage; or
(5) who writes or publishes or causes to be written or published, or who knowingly circulates, distributes, prints, or displays, or knowingly causes to be circulated, distributed, printed, published, or displayed or who knowingly has in his possession for the purpose of circulation, publication, distribution, or display, any written or printed matter, advocating or teaching opposition to all organized government, or advocating (A) the overthrow by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means of the Government of the United States or of all forms of law; or (B) the duty, necessity, or propriety of the unlawful assaulting or killing of any officer or officers (either of specific individuals or of officers generally) of the Government of the United States or of any other organized government, because of his or their official character; or (C) the unlawful damage, injury, or destruction of property; or (D) sabotage; or (E) the economic, international, and governmental doctrines of world communism or the establishment in the United States of a totalitarian dictatorship; or
(6) who is a member of or affiliated with any organization, that writes, circulates, distributes, prints, publishes, or displays, or causes to be written, circulated, distributed, printed, published, or displayed, or that has in its possession for the purpose of circulation, distribution, publication, issue, or display, any written or printed matter of the character described in subparagraph (5).
Chapter 2, Section 212 says entry to the U.S. should be prohibited if the person belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the U.S. government by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
Well…as Brown points out, “The Koran and the Hadiths present Sharia and demand submission to Islam” which as we all know is antithetical to the foundation of our nation and the U.S. Constitution.
And Islamists have made it no secret they wish to expand their caliphate across the globe and enact strict Sharia Law.
Critics will call this a “religious test,” but if you pledge allegiance to a faith which demands you adhere to Sharia Law over and above the U.S. Constitution, why would you want to live here anyway?
It’s not a religious test; it’s a test of fealty to the laws of this land. This should be the measure of all who wish to immigrate to our shores.
And we’ve already passed a law to ensure it. But clearly under this administration, laws have little meaning unless they advance the progressive agenda.
http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/12/this-us-law-proves-trumps-plan-for-muslims-is-perfectly-legal/