DoD Documents - Military Authorized to Quell Civil Unrest in the U.S.

[mick silver]

DoD Documents - Military Authorized to Quell Civil Unrest in the U.S| http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/user_thumb_submitted/pictures/picture-1.pngSCG (http://stormcloudsgathering.com/who-is-scg)

http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/full_page_image/uploads/npr_rifles.gif

What you may find particularly shocking is the conditions under which those forces can be deployed.


First of all, I would assert that it's never ok to use the military to crush internal unrest. Such measures are the hallmark of dictators and failed states. Some people however, might be inclined to justify the use of military force if the stakes are high enough. Trouble is once you open that door, who is to say where that line gets drawn?
Well, we don't actually have to ponder that question. The U.S. government has already given us their answer. Unfortunately according to a 2010 Department of Defense document entitled Directive 3025.18, the military is authorized to deploy within the U.S. to quell civil disturbances "when necessary to protect the Federal property or functions."
That's very broad, especially considering that the document discusses the conditions under which lethal force may be used. Soldiers are trained to kill. That's what they are good at.
You can download the document directly from the U.S. military's own website here. (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/302518p.pdf) You can also view an embedded version at the bottom of this page. Believe it or not, this document is not classified at all.
Federal military commanders are provided EMERGENCY AUTHORITY under this Directive. Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the President in accordance with applicable law (e.g., chapter 15 of Reference (d)) or permitted under emergency authority, as described below (see DoDD 3025.12 (Reference (j)) and DoDD 5525.5 (Reference (c))). In these circumstances, those Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances because:
(1) Such activities are necessary to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order; or,
(2) When duly constituted Federal, State, or local authorities are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for Federal property or Federal governmental functions. Federal action, including the use of Federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the Federal property or functions.
If you read through to the end of the document you will find that it states that unless this directive is revoked in 2015 it will remain in effect until 2020. Nice.
Seems like somebody's afraid that the peasants might get restless someday.


http://stormcloudsgathering.com/dod-documents-military-authorized-to-quell-civil-unrest-in-the-us click on link an you can see the dod report

[mick silver]

Why is the U.S. State Department Buying High Explosives? | http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/user_thumb_submitted/pictures/picture-1.pngSCG (http://stormcloudsgathering.com/who-is-scg)

http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/full_page_image/uploads/Victoria-Nuland-Weird.jpg

Apparently the U.S. State Department needs blasting caps, detonating cords and a variety of high explosives. If you think that sounds weird, wait till you read the purchase order yourself.


The U.S. State Department's job is to implement the foreign policy of the United States and U.S. diplomacy efforts. It is essentially the equivalent of a foreign ministry in other countries. It's not a branch of the military, and it's not a demolition company, so why on earth did they put in an order for blasting caps, detonating cords, and a variety of high explosives on fbo.gov? I'm not making this up. Click here (https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=b0a06189659221306176f41391c2fa33&_cview=0) to go look at the page yourself. Just in case they take the page down I've uploaded a screenshot here. (http://d56amtpp2y9sx.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/13--Explosives_-_Federal_Business_Opportunities_Opportunities_-_2014-05-13_15.14.08.png)
Below is the list of items they are currently accepting bids for:
The Department of State requires the following items, Meet or Exceed, to the following:
LI 001: 1.1 Comp C-4 M112, 1.25 lb Block w/Taggant, 360, EA;
LI 002: Detonating Cord - 50 Grains / Foot, 18000, FT;
LI 003: Detonating Cord - 25 Grains / Foot, 45000, FT;
LI 004: Cast Booster - 230 gram - (1/2 pound), 18000, EA;
LI 005: Sheet Exp - PETN based - C2 Thickness, 180, LB;
LI 006: LINEAR Shaped Charge, Copper, RDX, 400 Gr/ft, 144, FT;
LI 007: LINEAR Shaped Charge, Copper, RDX, 600 Gr/ft, 144, FT;
LI 008: Blasting Cap - Fuse Type #8- High Strength, 1350, EA;
LI 009: Blasting Caps, Elec., 12 ft., 250 ms del., 1800, EA;
LI 010: Blasting Caps, Elec., 12 ft., 500 ms del., 1800, EA;
LI 011: Blasting Caps, Elec., 12 ft. 750 ms del., 1800, EA;
LI 012: Blasting Caps, Elec., 12 ft. 1000 ms del., 1800, EA;
LI 013: Blasting Caps, Elec., 12 ft. instant, 1800, EA;
LI 014: Safety Fuse, Green - Military M700 type, 18000, FT;
LI 015: Electric Igniter, 6 ft. MJG, 12600, EA;
LI 016: Fuse igniter, pull string type, 9000, EA;
LI 017: Conical Shaped Charge 11 gram RDX, 900, EA;
LI 018: HELIX, (Liq & Activator) 1-3/8" x 8" (ALUMINUM POWDER), 1296, EA;
LI 019: HELIX LIQUID (NITROMETHANE), 1296, EA;
LI 020: Fuse Lighter, M81, 4050, EA;
LI 021: Red Dot Smokeless Powder Double Base, 180, LB;
Aren't these of things supposed to get routed through the CIA? Aren't they the ones in charge of covert mayhem and mischief?

Perhaps Victoria Nuland and company have gone off the reservation

[mick silver]

How Washington and its Allies Use Social Media to Topple Governments & Manipulate Public Opinion10.Apr.2014 | http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/user_thumb_submitted/pictures/picture-1.pngSCG (http://stormcloudsgathering.com/who-is-scg)




The U.S. government's latest attempt to topple Cuba using social media is just the tip of the iceberg, but what's really interesting is how connects to the Ukrainian crisis.


On April 2nd the Associated Press released an report exposing how the U.S. government recently attempted to topple the Cuban government yet again. This time the plot hinged on the creation of a communications network called "ZunZuneo" which was essentially a primitive version of Twitter. The plan, which was cooked up by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the U.S. State Department, was to build up a large following of users and then push them towards revolt. The network was built using shell companies and financed through a foreign bank to hide their connection to Washington. The Obama administration defended the program saying that it "had disclosed the initiative to Congress".
Of course we all know that attempting to topple a foreign government is perfectly fine as long as you let congress know a bit in advance.

As shocking and absurd as these revelations may be to the general public, the truth of the matter is that this is just the tip of the iceberg. The U.S. government and its allies have been using the internet as a covert weapon for some time now. Much of the evidence of these activities got mainstream coverage, but the corporate media is very careful not to refer to that evidence in the context of current events.
So let's connect a few dots here.
In 2011 it came to light that the U.S. military had developed a 'sock puppet' software for creating and managing fake online identities. These sock puppet accounts were to be used to spread propaganda on social media sites, forums and blogs. The software which was described as an "online persona management service" allows one soldier to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world. When this program was exposed the U.S. government claimed that the program was never used on English speaking audiences. Considering that these are the same people who swore up and down that the NSA surveillance program never targeted U.S. citizens, we can take that with a grain of salt, but it's worth noting that they explicitly acknowledged in their statement that the program was intended for covert operations in foreign countries.
A leaked document recently made public by Glenn Greenwald showed that the UK's GCHQ has been running a similar program through a unit called the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group (or JTRIG). You can download the file that Greenwald leaked here. (https://s3.amazonaws.com/scg_site_files/full-spectrum-cyber-effects-final.pdf)
According to the documents, JTRIG relies on two primary tactics: (1) the injection of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) the use of social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism towards desired outcomes.
Among the methods promoted in the document were "false flag operations" (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), posting “negative information” on various forums, luring targets into sexual encounters to destroy their reputations (honey-traps), sending emails and text messages to the target's friends, neighbors and coworkers, and “crafting messaging campaigns to go ‘viral’."
The documents placed an emphasis on using online techniques to trigger events in the real world.
http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/full_page_image/inline_image_uploads/GCHQ-JTRIG--Social-Media-Manipulation-Document-1.png
http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/full_page_image/inline_image_uploads/GCHQ-JTRIG--Social-Media-Manipulation-Document-2_0.png
http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/full_page_image/inline_image_uploads/GCHQ-JTRIG--Social-Media-Manipulation-Document-3_0.png
http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/full_page_image/inline_image_uploads/GCHQ-JTRIG--Social-Media-Manipulation-Document-4_0.png
Now remember the copy cat Twitter network designed to topple Cuba was put together by USAID. USAID maintains a public front of humanitarian aid and democracy promotion, but the Cuba scandal confirms what many geopolitical analysts have been saying for years: that USAID, like it's sibling The National Endowment for Democracy, is nothing more than a branch of the U.S. intelligence apparatus in disguise.
This confirmation also further exposes Washington's hand in toppling the Ukrainian government earlier this year.
Remember Victoria Nuland, the U.S. State Department diplomat who got caught in a leaked phone call discussing who should and should not be allowed into the new Ukrainian government?


In December of 2013 that same Victoria Nuland, made a speech at the U.S. - Ukraine Foundation in which she talked about how the U.S. government had invested over 5 billion dollars in Ukraine since 1991 to strengthen democracy.strengthen democracy.


She also specifically highlighted the important role the U.S. - Ukraine Foundation played in achieving their objectives.
Her statements taken on their own aren't incriminating, but if you go to the U.S. - Ukraine foundation's website you'll find that their programs are funded and run by the U.S. State Department and USAID. Remember this is the same USAID that just got caught attempting to topple Cuba.
USAID's connections to the Ukrainian coup don't end there.
It just so happens that Larry Diamond, the executive producer of the "I am Ukrainian" video that went viral at the height of the crisis in Kiev (http://stormcloudsgathering.com/washingtons-role-in-the-ukrainian-coup-how-it-may-spin-out-of-control), isn't just a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the National Endowment for Democracy (http://www.ned.org/about/staff/larry-diamond), and an advisor for the U.S. State Department, his public profile also mentions that he works for USAID.
That's interesting. Let's connect the dots a bit more shall we?
Remember that drama in March where Lis Wahl quit RT News on air in protest over their coverage of the events in Ukraine? It created quite the stir, even among activists that are usually critical of U.S. foreign policy.


That event was staged. A neo-con think tank called the Foreign Policy Initiative knew the stunt was about to happen and began tweeting out hints twenty minutes in advance.
The first tweet (https://twitter.com/ForeignPolicyI/status/441336436235587584):
“#WordOnTheStreet says that something big might happen on RT in about 20-25 minutes.”
Then, 10 minutes before Wahl would quit on air they tweeted (https://twitter.com/ForeignPolicyI/status/441336436235587584):
“#WordOnTheStreet says you’re really going to want to tune in to RT:http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/ #SomethinBigMayBeGoingDown”
And finally, at 5:26 p.m., at the very moment Wahl quit, the Foreign Policy Initiative's Twitter account broke the news (https://twitter.com/ForeignPolicyI/status/441338898375905280): "RT Anchor RESIGNS ON AIR. She ‘cannot be part of a network that whitewashes the actions of Putin.’ "
Remember our friend Victoria Nuland? It just so happens that her husband, Robert Kagan, sits on the board of directors for the Foreign Policy Initiative. Wow, what a coincidence. An organization that Victoria Nuland's husband controls launches a smear campaign against RT at a time when RT is one of the few major outlets broadcasting her leaked audio.
Robert Kagan also serves on the U.S. State Department's Foreign Affairs Policy Board and he co-founded the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) with William Kristol, who also sits on the board of the Foreign Policy Initiative. Do a little research into the Project For a New American Century if you want to really dig up some interesting connections.
All just coincidences.
I'm sure it's also just a coincidence that James Kirchick, who happens to be a member of the Foreign Policy Initiative, released an exclusive interview with Lis Wahl on the DailyBeast just one hour after her choreographed stunt.
Here's James and Lis posing together in a "freedom selfie". (https://twitter.com/jkirchick/status/441720034873081856)
http://d3cced9h6ghzi5.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/imagecache/full_page_image/inline_image_uploads/Liz-Wahl-James-Kirchick-Freedom-Selfie.jpg
The Liz Wahl stunt was a fairly benign example of social media being used to manipulate public opinion. To really understand how far these kinds of psychological operations are taken we need to step back to February 20th when a video went viral showing snipers shooting protesters in Kiev.
Almost everyone assumed that these were Ukrainian government forces firing the shots, but they weren't. The following phone conversation between EU foreign policy chief Cathy Ashton and Estonia's foreign minister Urmas Paet, which was leaked to the public on March 5th, makes this very clear.
The short version of the leaked call:
Urmas Paet: "All the evidence shows that the people who were killed by snipers from both sides, among police men and people in the street, that they were the same snipers killing people from both sides."

Cathy Ashton: "Well that's, yeah..."

Urmas Paet: "And she also showed me some photos and she said that has medical doctor, she can say that it is the same handwriting..."

Cathy Ashton: "Yeah..."

Urmas Paet: "Same type of bullets... and it's really disturbing that now the new coalition, that they don't want to investigate what exactly happened. So that there is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovich, but it was somebody from the new coalition."
The long version of the leaked call:
It doesn't a rocket scientist to figure out that the only parties who would benefit from shooting both police and protesters at the same time are those who were working to topple the Ukrainian government.
That much is obvious.
The only real question here is whether the footage of the shootings in Kiev was filmed and released by the perpetrators themselves. We'll never know for sure unless there's a real investigation, and no, having the primary suspect run an investigation doesn't count.
We saw this same tactic of killing civilians, and using a coordinated social media campaign to pin the blame on a government targeted for regime change, in Syria in 2013. (http://stormcloudsgathering.com/the-syrian-war-what-youre-not-being-told)


These were U.S. backed rebels that killed thousands of innocent civilians with nerve gas. Those that funded this atrocity are still walking free. Those who coordinated the sniper killings in Kiev are still walking free, and the mainstream media, and these so called world leaders don't even so much as call them out.
Think about that.




Front groups, sock puppets, public relations stunts, and outright murder. That's how Washington and its allies topple governments and manipulate public opinion in the age of the internet, but make no mistake this is not new.



Share to Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://stormcloudsgathering.com/how-washington-and-its-allies-use-social-media-to-topple-governments-manipulate-public-opinion?utm_source=share-fb)

[mick silver]

http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/dd395-Cop-s.jpg