Republican debate on CBS

[vacuum]

It starts in less than 10 minutes.

Official cbs stream link: http://www.cbsnews.com/live/

Youtube live stream

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ua4LmOHGRL0

Another stream:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGXQcydM2aA

[midnight rambler]

What a show. Trump is kickin'. Jeb! is showing his desperation.

[midnight rambler]

Robo Rubio is such a whiny little bitch.

[EE_]

The audience is stacked with anti-Trump people, paid to boo Trump and cheer the others.

[Cebu_4_2]

I don't trust anyone but if Trump put out hookers I would have company right now.

[Joshua01]

I don't need no stickin MSM debate, I know who I'm voting for and it ain't a politician

[Cebu_4_2]

Holey fucking war zone!!!

[Cebu_4_2]

I don't need no stickin MSM debate, I know who I'm voting for and it ain't a politician

ouu are missing the biggest show of the century.
Y

[Joshua01]

It's all theatre. I'd watch it but I had already planned on driving nails through my penis this evening and don't see any reason to change those plans

[vacuum]

LOL at Ben Carson quoting Josef Stalin in his closing statement. I don't know where he comes up with this stuff but it's great.

[Cebu_4_2]

LOL at Ben Carson quoting Josef Stalin in his closing statement. I don't know where he comes up with this stuff but it's great. s Trump was on his own, didn't take anyone down with him.
I think Ben and Trump are colaborating. Trumps end was fantastic. You cant make thi shit up.

Nice formating This is so fucked up, just an update would fix it! Nomatter... pffft.

[Cebu_4_2]

Ban me, I would have much more time. LMAO the Vbul update that is FREE takes care of this issue.

I will take over this forum John since it seems to be such a huge issue.

Ban me.

[vacuum]

I feel like I'm seeing history unfold. I haven't seen very many presidencies as an adult, but I feel like what we're seeing has never happened before.

[Ponce]

They want anyone but Trump........

V

[midnight rambler]

I feel like I'm seeing history unfold. I haven't seen very many presidencies as an adult, but I feel like what we're seeing has never happened before.

Perot had critical mass by mid to late March and was unstoppable by late May of '92*, then he got neutralized when 'they' realized they had a real problem. IMO Trump isn't anywhere near critical mass at this point, which may actually work in his favor.

*based on extremely reliable inside info

[EE_]

I would have liked to see Trump call out Jeb during the heat of the debate, on why Jeb was ashamed of his family name during most of his election campaign, that he wouldn't use his last name. He could have told Jeb to explain to the audience why he's so proud now but wasn't then.

[Horn]

The Republican establishment packed the debate audience with Donald Trump haters

Something very peculiar happened at the Republican debate on Saturday night: When Donald Trump talked, the audience booed. Yet when Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and evenJohn Kasich talked, they got loud cheers and applause.

This happened again and again. It even led a spike in Google searches (https://twitter.com/GoogleTrends/status/698699868429295617) for "Why are people booing?"



Trump, at one point, scoffed that the audience was made up of "Jeb 's special interests and lobbyists."

It turns out this may not be that far-fetched. Prior to the debate, the Republican Party decided not to use a lottery system to decide who should be in the audience. Instead, most tickets went to elected Republican officials, donors, and other workers for the party picked by local, state, and national party officials. The result, it seems, is the room was packed with Republican voters who [B]overwhelmingly dislike Trump.

http://www.vox.com/2016/2/13/10987776/republican-debate-audience-booing

[EE_]

Sitting on his campaign bus — laptop, turkey jerky, and coffee all nearby — Jeb Bush was befuddled over his campaign’s failure to capture more attention from the news media.

“I could drop my pants,” he said in an interview. “Moon the whole crowd. Everybody would be aghast, except the press guys would never notice.”
http://downtrend.com/?p=40669

Now I ask ya, which would you be more repulsed by, Trump saying Damn, or Ass...or the thought of jeb with his pants down?

[vacuum]

Debate polls:



Drudge Report HERE (http://www.drudgereport.com/)
Right Scoop Poll HERE (http://therightscoop.com/debate-poll-who-do-you-think-won-the-cbs-news-south-carolina-debate/)
FOX5 Poll HERE (http://fox5sandiego.com/2016/02/13/poll-who-won-the-9th-gop-debate/)
BLAZE Poll HERE (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/02/13/blaze-poll-who-won-the-cbs-news-south-carolina-debate/)
Time Magazine Poll HERE (http://time.com/4220703/republican-debate-ninth-south-carolina-poll-survey/)
Syracuse Poll HERE (http://www.syracuse.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/02/poll_who_won_saturdays_republican_2016_presidentia l_debate.html)
Heavy.Com Poll HERE (http://heavy.com/news/2016/02/who-won-gop-republican-debate-poll-trump-cruz-rubio-carson-bush-kasich-south-carolina/) (scroll down)
The Street Poll HERE (http://www.thestreet.com/story/13458470/1/trump-cruz-and-more-who-won-tonight-s-gop-debate.html)
Conservative Firing Line Poll HERE (http://conservativefiringline.com/poll-who-do-you-think-won-the-cbs-gop-debate-in-south-carolina-and-why/)
PolitOpinion Poll HERE (http://politopinion.com/2016/02/410/?yop_poll_answer=204&yop_poll_other_answer=&yop_poll_tr_id=&yop-poll-nonce-46_yp56c001aed18e7=d097bb0f3a)
Wall Street Journal Poll HERE (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/02/13/saturdays-republican-presidential-debate-live-blog/?redirectUrl=http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/02/13/saturdays-republican-presidential-debate-live-blog/%3FwidgetVersion%3Dv1%23entry_155#entry_155)
Fox31 Poll HERE (http://kdvr.com/2016/02/13/who-is-winning-the-debate/)






Current results:
https://i.imgur.com/3ZnKeJX.jpg

[Joshua01]

These Republican morons are all taking each other down while the socialist and the felonyqueen yuck it up on the Dem side. The Republicants would fuck up a wet dream

[vacuum]

Post debate interview


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYrFXwkgfkU

[vacuum]

Here's what went down between Trump and Bush. Word is that Trump would not shake Bush's hand after the event


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9l6ouupdfI

[Shami-Amourae]

I already voted.

[Cebu_4_2]

I already voted.

Hillary?

[Shami-Amourae]

Hillary?

No. Hitler 2.0.

[midnight rambler]

Here's what went down between Trump and Bush. Word is that Trump would not shake Bush's hand after the event


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9l6ouupdfI

Jeb! stutters...sure indication of a bald-faced liar caught lying.

[midnight rambler]

Larry King interviews Trump at the '88 Republican convention -


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Usb0iE5WiZI

[mick silver]

http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/hammer-nails-vector-art-7667277.jpg
It's all theatre. I'd watch it but I had already planned on driving nails through my penis this evening and don't see any reason to change those plans

[EE_]

I added a poll


Debate polls:



Drudge Report HERE (http://www.drudgereport.com/)
Right Scoop Poll HERE (http://therightscoop.com/debate-poll-who-do-you-think-won-the-cbs-news-south-carolina-debate/)
FOX5 Poll HERE (http://fox5sandiego.com/2016/02/13/poll-who-won-the-9th-gop-debate/)
BLAZE Poll HERE (http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/02/13/blaze-poll-who-won-the-cbs-news-south-carolina-debate/)
Time Magazine Poll HERE (http://time.com/4220703/republican-debate-ninth-south-carolina-poll-survey/)
Syracuse Poll HERE (http://www.syracuse.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/02/poll_who_won_saturdays_republican_2016_presidentia l_debate.html)
Heavy.Com Poll HERE (http://heavy.com/news/2016/02/who-won-gop-republican-debate-poll-trump-cruz-rubio-carson-bush-kasich-south-carolina/) (scroll down)
The Street Poll HERE (http://www.thestreet.com/story/13458470/1/trump-cruz-and-more-who-won-tonight-s-gop-debate.html)
Conservative Firing Line Poll HERE (http://conservativefiringline.com/poll-who-do-you-think-won-the-cbs-gop-debate-in-south-carolina-and-why/)
PolitOpinion Poll HERE (http://politopinion.com/2016/02/410/?yop_poll_answer=204&yop_poll_other_answer=&yop_poll_tr_id=&yop-poll-nonce-46_yp56c001aed18e7=d097bb0f3a)
Wall Street Journal Poll HERE (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/02/13/saturdays-republican-presidential-debate-live-blog/?redirectUrl=http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/02/13/saturdays-republican-presidential-debate-live-blog/%3FwidgetVersion%3Dv1%23entry_155#entry_155)
Fox31 Poll HERE (http://kdvr.com/2016/02/13/who-is-winning-the-debate/)
http://crooksandliars.com/2016/02/snap-poll-who-won-south-carolina


Snap Poll: Who Won The South Carolina Republican Debate?





Current results:
https://i.imgur.com/3ZnKeJX.jpg

[mick silver]

Another Serious Debate Victory Against the Shills http://www.dailystormer.com/another-serious-debate-victory-against-the-shills/

[mick silver]

Neocon Jew John Podhoretz Says Trump is Too MeanAndrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 14, 2016
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/trump-ny-post-jew-618x576.jpg (http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/trump-ny-post-jew.jpg)
Leave it to Jews to produce ridiculous feminine arguments which defy basic sense.
The neocon Jew, John Podhoretz, writing for New York Post (http://nypost.com/2016/02/13/trump-was-out-of-control-in-south-carolina-debate/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter), has attacked The Donald for being a mean person.

Donald Trump was so awful, so horrible, so disgusting in the latest Republican debate — his lies, his distortions, his deceits, and his libels thicker and fouler than they’ve yet been—that he’s done us all a favor. If he wins easily in South Carolina after his monstrous turn, he’ll be going straight to the Republican nomination.
Such a victory in a classically conservative state like South Carolina after his romp in idiosyncratic New Hampshire will prove Trump’s repellent personality is the real key to his success. You want me to delineate his dishonesties? That would be like asking me to count how many breaths he took.
We will not be able to labor under any delusions after a win comparable to his triumph in New Hampshire. We will know for a certainty that the man Republicans want for their tribune in 2016 is a disgusting jerk they somehow believe will have their backs when the only back he’s ever had is his own.
…
He interrupts, he yells over them, he insults them, he goes over his allotted time, and the whirlwind he creates turns into a vacuum that sucks all the air out of the place and right into his attention-whore lungs.
They won’t do it back, and who can blame them. They’re hungry, ambitious, even desperate men—but they still operate according to basic rules of elementary human conduct.
Jeb Bush tussled with Trump, but at one point he said it was okay for Trump to denigrate him but he should leave Jeb’s family alone. And right there, he proved Trump right in the terms in which Trump sees the world—the Donald strong, the Jeb weak.
Alas, just as you don’t bring a knife to a gunfight, you can’t bring disapprobation to a showdown with Hannibal Lecter and hope to survive. You have to eat his liver with fava beans and a good chianti before he eats yours. How? How the hell do I know? But I’m not running for president. They are.
And the thing is, he might have eaten all their livers already.
Is name-calling really their only trick?
I thought they had more tricks than this?

[mick silver]

Britcuck Tim Stanley Responds to Our Mild Trolling, Must be Hit HarderBenjamin Garland
Daily Stormer
February 14, 2016

http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Tim-Stanley-CU-618x363.jpg (http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Tim-Stanley-CU.jpg)What kind of weird faggot intentionally brushes only half of his hair?Recently I wrote an article pointing out how a Britcuck named Timothy Stanley was whining about how he thought Trump’s candidacy was “wrong and damaging at a time when America is evolving towards a less-white society.” (http://www.dailystormer.com/britcuck-timothy-stanley-fears-that-donald-trump-will-slow-white-genocide-wants-him-stumped-pronto/) In it, I made a half-assed call for people to troll his Twitter account and ask why he is so eager to have his race gang-raped out of existence by Moslem terrorists.
Looking through his Twitter history later I saw that a few people had done this, and that some had already been calling him out for his anti-White rhetoric even prior to the publishing of my article.
The next day he wrote an article in response (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/donald-trump/12154115/Donald-Trump-is-not-a-conservative.-Neither-are-those-racists-who-support-him.html), wherein he cried about the “vile, unpleasant attacks” he was receiving.
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/timcuck.png (http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/timcuck.png)
No explanation anywhere in the article as to why he thinks White people should be raped and murdered en masse by hordes of Third World savages, or why he hates his own people so much, or why he thinks becoming “less-white” is a step in evolution despite the crime, disease, poverty, and general lowering of living standards that follows and increases in direct proportion to how “less-white” anywhere has ever become ever.
Rather, the piece is just typical perverted bull-prepping garbage, like all of his articles: Trump is not a conservative blahblah Trump supporters are racist blablablah Trump must be stopped blablablah Moslems are wonderful blah blah, whatever.
Nobody cares.
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ef455b97c1c90c949087489c2d576a9f26e83109_1_385x500 .jpg (http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ef455b97c1c90c949087489c2d576a9f26e83109_1_385x500 .jpg)
This just goes to show how easy it has become to get a reaction out of these bastards. These are wins, every time. When the mainstream Jewsmedia is reacting to us, even if they are attacking us (of course they’ll be attacking us), it is a victory.
Especially when they are talking about Jewish plots against the White race…
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/1719241-618x1193.png (http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/1719241.png)
The problem: this guy hasn’t been trolled nearly enough. He is obviously an actual cuck and has very low testosterone, as he seems to spend every waking moment flustered over the rise of The Donald, and he got extremely upset and emotional over just a handful of our righteous Hate Tweets. Perfect target (he is even a Hillary supporter, I think).
Why should his back not be put against the wall for calling for the death of the White race, repeatedly?
Strategy: go to his Twitter (@timothy_stanley (https://twitter.com/timothy_stanley)) and troll whatever is his most recent Tweet only. Well, not only, if you want to do more, but if you respond to one just make sure it is the most recent, and if you respond to two make sure at least one is the most recent, etc. Do this periodically at least once a day for at least a week, that way if there are enough of us, all of his Tweets will be hit, resulting in maximum jimmie rustling.
This will avoid all of the trolling being concentrated on only a few of his most offensive Tweets, which is what has happened so far. All of his Tweets are fair game: he wants to have all of your sisters and daughters gang-raped by brown people and then use his media power to cover for said brown people while calling you an evil racist for objecting – and so he must be called to account.

He must be destroyed, along with all of his cuck and kike allies.
The day of the cucks and kikes is coming to an end, as the dawn of the White Man returns.
He tweets multiple times daily, every couple of hours, on average (while he is active, at least).
gogogogogogogogogogogoogoogogogogoogogogogooogo

[EE_]

Best line of the night:

BUSH: "My mom is the strongest woman I know."
TRUMP: "She should be running."

Biggest ball sucking of the night
RUBIO: (closing statement) "We will be loyal to our allies like Israel"

https://youtu.be/IE8G3myg2Zk?t=1m

[Ponce]

Will the Donald become the dictator that we have been waiting for?...... welcome Castro jr.

V

[Cebu_4_2]

Best line of the night:

BUSH: "My mom is the strongest woman I know."
TRUMP: "She should be running."

https://youtu.be/IE8G3myg2Zk?t=1m

That one even made the wife LOL. He has quick wit.

[EE_]

RNC Under Fire Over Debate Audience Stacking–Local GOP Chairman Confirms Party Donors Get Debate Tickets
by MATTHEW BOYLE
14 Feb 2016 GREENVILLE, South Carolina

GREENVILLE, South Carolina — The chairman of the local Republican Party here confirmed to local television that 2016 frontrunner billionaire Donald Trump’s concerns—and those of his closest competitor Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)—with the Republican National Committee (RNC) allocation of debate audience tickets are well-placed.

Chad Groover, the chairman of the Greenville County Republican Party here, told WYFF—the local NBC News station—that party donors get tickets to the debate.

“You’ll have a good mix of people who are donors, people who are donors and workers, and people who are just workers,” Groover said, noting that he got “a couple of dozen” of tickets to hand out to the party’s faithful donors.

“I didn’t have hundreds of tickets. I had a couple of dozen tickets,” Groover said.

That means a significant proportion of his stack of approximately 24 tickets went to monied interests backing the GOP—not to actual voters in the upcoming election.

Sources close to the process who work for the RNC, but are not authorized to speak on the record, confirmed to Breitbart News throughout the evening on Saturday that that is standard operating procedure for the RNC and the party as a whole for all debates: Donors get tickets while voters have to watch on TV at home.

As such, the same appears to have been true party-wide. One well-placed source who works for one of the GOP presidential campaigns and was in attendance at the debate on Saturday evening here—but was not authorized to speak on record about the matter—told Breitbart News that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley were personally given scores of tickets to distribute. Both despise Trump and have said so publicly–Haley even using the platform of the official GOP response to the State of the Union to do so–and it would be no surprise if they did aim to stack the audience with anti-Trump sentiment.

“I’ve never seen anything like it,” said another source in the audience, someone who has attended several of the GOP debates. That source said the anti-Trump and anti-Cruz audience members—who were thoroughly cheering for Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and his mentor former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush when they made passionate cases for amnesty for illegal aliens, something entirely non-representative of South Carolina’s electorate—were behaving unlike any audience he’d ever seen in his lifetime of attending GOP presidential debates.

The Republican National Committee’s Sean Spicer confirmed to Breitbart News pre-debate that the RNC proper distributed 367 tickets while the state party and locally elected officials received 550 tickets. Meanwhile the debate partners—CBS News, the Peace Center, and Google—received another 100 tickets. That means more than 1000 tickets—1,017 by Spicer’s admission—went not to voters in the upcoming election and not to campaigns for equal distribution to their supporters but to special interest distribution of those connected to the party, mostly high dollar donors. Only 600 tickets were distributed equally among the six remaining GOP campaigns, which to be fair to the RNC is the highest number of tickets distributed as such so far this election cycle.

But Trump’s campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, is calling for the RNC to drop all donor tickets and stop handing them out to special and monied interests entirely. Lewandowski says at all the rest of the debates from here on out, Spicer and the RNC must equally allocate all tickets among the various campaigns so they can distribute them equally and fairly to their supporters—and cut out all the donors and special interests who get tickets.

“I think the RNC does a terrible job in allocating the tickets, to be honest with you, There’s an opportunity—there’s 2,000 seats out there, there’s six candidates on stage, they should just divide them evenly so everyone has them, but instead they just give them to the donor class, they give them to the lobbyists and to all the special interests,” Lewandowski said in the spin room. “It’s not fair, it’s not equitable. So I think what they should do moving forward is take the total number of seats available, allocate them across the board and let the candidates bring their people in, because that’s who should be here, not the donors.”

Spicer has refused repeatedly over the course of several emails on Saturday and Sunday morning to answer whether the RNC will comply with Lewandowski’s request to drop all RNC and state and local party ticket allocation and just allow the campaigns to equally distribute all debate tickets fairly to their supporters in the future.

Trump’s and Cruz’s concerns are even being confirmed by many across the political spectrum. In fact, even the left-of-center Huffington Post confirms that the RNC’s ticket allocation system seems to have been “behind” the excessive and unwarranted booing of Trump and Cruz—and cheering of the donor class supported Rubio and Bush.

“The audience at Saturday’s CBS News Republican presidential debate was more boisterous than unusual — booing, clapping and generally making its feelings known during several exchanges between candidates on stage in Greenville, South Carolina,” the Huffington Post’s Igor Bobic wrote. “At various points, attendees seemed to favor former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), and to be very much against Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and real estate mogul Donald Trump — the two candidates currently leading the race. The way the Republican National Committee distributed the tickets may have been behind the heightened reactions.”

Vox, another left-of-center outlet, ran a headline that made it even clearer: “The Republican establishment packed the debate audience with Donald Trump haters.” In the piece, author German Lopez noted that the audience’s pro-Rubio and pro-Bush cheering was “very peculiar” as was the booing of Trump and Cruz.

“Something very peculiar happened at the Republican debate on Saturday night: When Donald Trump talked, the audience booed. Yet when Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, and even John Kasich talked, they got loud cheers and applause,” Lopez wrote. “This happened again and again. It even led a spike in Google searches for ‘Why are people booing?’”

Vox even admits that Trump’s claim on stage that the odd—and unrepresentative of the party’s voting base—audience was made up of “Jeb’s special interests and lobbyists” was really not “that far-fetched.”

“Prior to the debate, the Republican Party decided not to use a lottery system to decide who should be in the audience,” Lopez wrote. “Instead, most tickets went to elected Republican officials, donors, and other workers for the party picked by local, state, and national party officials. The result, it seems, is the room was packed with Republican voters who overwhelmingly dislike Trump.”

That seems to be why Lewandowski is calling for a new system for fairness, one that cuts the RNC completely out of the process. It remains to be seen if other campaigns will get on board with this, but earlier in the cycle–due to the RNC’s ineffectiveness in dealing with biased moderators–the entire field of campaign managers met privately to cut the RNC out of the process of negotiating with the networks. It is only logical that the next step is that the campaigns work to ensure fairness in debate audience selection, something the RNC clearly failed at providing.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/14/rnc-under-fire-over-debate-audience-stacking-as-local-gop-chairman-confirms-party-donors-get-debate-tickets/

[Shami-Amourae]

Listen up Niggers, Trump will make anime REAL!
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1455/48/1455485645431.png

[midnight rambler]

That one even made the wife LOL. He has quick wit.

Yeah, he has snap. He's able to think on his feet. We need that rather than someone who has to check in with control regarding what to say or do.

[JohnQPublic]

Yeah, he has snap. He's able to think on his feet. We need that rather than someone who has to check in with control regarding what to say or do.

... Or check with their mommy.

[vacuum]

bump

[vacuum]

Look at this garbage. They had Donald Trump's mic turned down during the debate.






https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/675551828172492801/nrXyXuQN_bigger.jpg Daniel Scavino Jr. Verified account ‏@DanScavino (https://twitter.com/DanScavino)

Rumors flying @realDonaldTrump (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump)'s MIC was low 40's DSB- others mid/high 50's @ #GOPDebate (https://twitter.com/hashtag/GOPDebate?src=hash). Sadly, it wouldn't be a surprise. He still won.




Retweets 69
Likes 100


11:15 PM - 14 Feb 2016

[Cebu_4_2]

He spoke louder if you noticed.

[EE_]

More RNC Fraud! I hope the Trump people see this.

That Debate Moment When the Script Is Evidenced…
Posted on February 14, 2016 by sundance

No intellectually honest person can deny the Greenville South Carolina debate was constructed to provide maximum benefit for Marco Rubio. The structure was so brutally transparent even the customarily obtuse punditry are having a hard time obfuscating.

We have been pointing to the GOPe road-map for over two years. As each tripwire is crossed, the ridiculous justifications of those in denial necessarily increase; but that doesn’t mean we will stop pointing out the strings on the presidential marionette show. Cue yet another audio visual demonstration.

Do you see anything odd with this screen shot from the live CBS debate?

http://www.thenewscommenter.com/images/uploads/upload145548936366634_thumb.jpg

Perhaps you’ll note – that in order for the CBS production staff to put a Marco Rubio “immigration position” graphic on the screen, at the exact moment when he was questioned about it – there had to be a particular pre-planned intent.

And no other candidate had ANY similar graphic used, at any individual moment, on any individual topic, other than this one. This was the only time CBS put out a candidate position graphic during a candidate response. Are you more curious now?


The moment this took place was at 54:48 of the video below. However, I would suggest any interested observer to begin playing the video just prior to CBS News Major Garrett asking the question.

Cue the video to 54:07, pay close attention to the gently worded and intentionally open-ended question. “for the purposes of legislation, define amnesty“?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_i4Y9-WIXiQ

Don’t you just love those softball open-enders…. Especially when they are placed upon a tee with such diligence and care.

Now go back and watch the video again. Even more closely this time. Look at Rubio, watch his eyes and body language – apply your own common sense to what you are witnessing.

Not only did Rubio know the topic question was coming. Not only did the CBS live broadcast production team know the question was coming (hence the graphic), but Rubio had topic notes (on the podium) for reference during his response.

Again, for emphasis: ♦ The professional Republican party insiders want Marco Rubio to win the nomination; they have been open with their advocacy. ♦ The Greenville audience was pro-Rubio, even admitted by the republican insiders who were participating. ♦ The media noted during the debate, the audience seemed structurally designed. ♦ Rubio was tee’d up with a strategic softball. ♦ And the “live” CBS production staff knew to have a graphic ready at a specific moment. ♦ A broadcast enhancement exclusive for Senator Marco Rubio.

….Once you see the strings on the marionettes you cannot watch the pantomime the same way again; because you can never return that moment when you did not know they existed….

The Republican National Committee (RNC), in coordination with the DC beltway, GOPe establishment, insider and party donor class, are “Grubering” us!
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/02/14/that-debate-moment-when-the-script-is-evidenced/

[vacuum]

More RNC Fraud! I hope the Trump people see this.

That Debate Moment When the Script Is Evidenced…
http://www.thenewscommenter.com/images/uploads/upload145548936366634_thumb.jpg


Why. WHY would you literally provide a script to the one candidate people are accusing of being a robot. How could they possibly think this would help him? It's incredible.

[Cebu_4_2]

More RNC Fraud! I hope the Trump people see this.

That Debate Moment When the Script Is Evidenced…
Posted on February 14, 2016 by sundance


Think I read it here os GSUS Rubios ?(daughter) or someone was the lead question writer for FOX or the GNC in general. Would tie right into this rigged gray area on CBS.

[EE_]

Why. WHY would you literally provide a script to the one candidate people are accusing of being a robot. How could they possibly think this would help him? It's incredible.

Because he is the easiest of the establishment's picks to control.
Who knows what the Jewish elite have planned next? Murder?


CBS dummied their poll too. Rubio didn't win shit!

A week after a poor debate performance, Rubio wins one
Feb 14th 2016 2:29PM

Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio won the poll he may have needed most right now.
Thirty-two percent of participants in a CBS poll said he was the winner of Saturday night's GOP debate. Donald Trump took second with 24 percent and John Kasich third with 19 percent.

Rubio's win follows a fifth-place loss in the New Hampshire primary days before. He attributed the lack of votes to a poor debate performance leading up to the primary.

Only time will tell if his debate win will help him catch up to Trump, who leads him by almost 23 percent in the upcoming South Carolina primary.
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/02/14/80378060/

Look how many websites the scammers got this article out to http://search.aol.com/aol/search?q=A%20week%20after%20a%20poor%20debate%20pe rformance%2C%20Rubio%20wins%20one&s_it=keyword_rollover&ie=UTF-8&VR=3430

[vacuum]

Google Trends also deleted a trending tweet people were asking about Jeb.

They're supposed to simply present what data is trending, but in this case they censored the data. Absolutely disgusting.

The highest trending tweet for Jeb Bush which they deleted was "When will Jeb Bush drop out?"

[EE_]

The whole political process is corrupt and needs to be called out!

Interview Transcript Proves Rubio Promised Hispanics en Español He’d Keep Executive Amnesty in Place
by JULIA HAHN14 Feb 2016Washington D.C.745

In what could arguably be seen as another debate debacle for Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), the Florida Senator seemed to confirm Phyllis Schlafly’s assertion that he is “back to his old ways” of deceiving conservatives on immigration.

In response to attacks leveled against him by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), Rubio made a demonstrably and provably false declaration about his position on President Obama’s executive amnesty. Rubio even accused Cruz of “telling lies” about his position on executive amnesty– even though nationally-televised video footage of Marco Rubio confirms Cruz’s allegation, and reveals that Rubio lied in front of a nation-wide viewing audience during tonight’s debate.

Cruz said: “Marco right now supports citizenship for 12 million people here illegally. I oppose citizenship… Marco has a long record when it comes to amnesty. In the state of Florida, as Speaker of the House, he supported in-state tuition for illegal immigrants. In addition to that, Marco went on Univision in Spanish and said he would not rescind President Obama’s illegal executive amnesty on his first day in office. I have promised to rescind every single illegal executive action, including that one.”

Cruz was referring specifically to President Obama’s 2012 executive amnesty for illegal immigrants who allegedly came to the country as minors. The unconstitutional amnesty known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals– or DACA– remains fully operational to this day. DACA not only gives illegal immigrants immunity from deportation, but also grants them work permits and access to federal benefits.

Indeed, video footage of Sen. Rubio confirms Cruz’s assertion. In an April Spanish-language interview, Rubio told Univision’s Jorge Ramos: “I wouldn’t undo it [DACA] immediately.” Rubio elaborated in English, telling Ramos: “I don’t think we can immediately revoke that [DACA]… I’m not calling for it to be revoked tomorrow, or this week, or right away.”

Yet Rubio– seemingly comfortable in the knowledge that the debate moderators would not be presenting any actual information on Rubio’s immigration record– simply denied Cruz’s charge, despite the existence of a readily available transcript which confirms Cruz’s claim. Rubio argued that Cruz didn’t know what he was talking about because– unlike Rubio– Cruz is not fluent in Spanish.

“First of all, I don’t know how he knows what I said on Univision because he doesn’t speak Spanish,” Rubio said in response to Cruz’s accusation.

Asserting that non-Spanish speakers will never find out what you promise Spanish-speaking voters so long as you promise it in Spanish, is a curious tactic for someone who has been accused of telling voters one thing in English and another thing in Spanish. Rubio is essentially acknowledging that if he delivers a message in Spanish, English speakers won’t be able to catch on to what he’s saying.

Rubio then accused Cruz of fabricating the entire account: “Look, this is a disturbing pattern now, because for a number of weeks now, Ted Cruz has just been telling lies. He lied about Ben Carson in Iowa. He lies about Planned Parenthood. He lies about marriage. He’s lying about all sorts of things. And now he makes things up.”

However, video footage confirms Cruz’s accusation– and suggests that it is Rubio who is “telling lies” about his record.

Indeed, in both Spanish and English language interviews, Rubio said that he would not “immediately” rescind Obama’s unconstitutional 2012 executive amnesty. Rubio even said that his “ideal” plan would be to leave Obama’s unconstitutional amnesty in place until Rubio’s long-sought after legislative amnesty can replace it– i.e. Rubio has the same position on DREAMer amnesty as does President Obama.



RUBIO’S SPANISH-LANGUAGE UNIVISION INTERVIEW

In April of last year, Rubio appeared on a Spanish-language interview with Jorge Ramos and said that he would not “undo” Obama’s unconstitutional amnesty “immediately”.

It is perhaps bizarre that Rubio would now try to deny the existence of this exchange, since Rubio’s campaign– in an on-the-record interview with Breitbart News — confirmed the Univision translation of Rubio’s comments.

According to the Univision transcript, Rubio said in Spanish:

Well, DACA is going to have to end at some point. I wouldn’t undo it immediately. The reason is that there are already people who have that permission, who are working, who are studying, and I don’t think it would be fair to cancel it suddenly. But I do think it is going to have to end. And, God willing, it’s going to end because immigration reform is going to pass.

This is not the first time Rubio has been caught in linguistic amnesty games before. As Phyllis Schlafly has pointed out, in 2013 Rubio told Rush Limbaugh that, under the Gang of Eight bill, border enforcement would precede amnesty. However, “Rubio had a different message in Spanish media. As Byron York reported: ‘Let’s be clear,’ Rubio said. ‘Nobody is talking about preventing the legalization. The legalization is going to happen. That means the following will happen: First comes the legalization. Then come the measures to secure the border. And then comes the process of permanent residence.’”

In April of 2015, following the Senator’s Univision interview, Rubio’s campaign suggested that a President Rubio’s DREAMer amnesty would precede border security. As Breitbart News previously reported: “The chief spokesman for the presidential campaign of Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said in an on-record interview with Breitbart News that the senator, if elected president, would not require a secured border before he gives legislative and permanent amnesty to recipients of President Barack Obama’s first executive amnesty, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program… ‘I mean when we were working on the 2012 bill, that was independent of the border,’ [Alex] Conant said. ‘These are the kids that already — I mean, the kids are in a very unique situation because they didn’t willingly break the law.’”



RUBIO’S ENGLISH-LANGUAGE UNIVISION INTERVIEW

Rubio reiterated his desire not to rescind DACA immediately in an English-language interview with Jorge Ramos in April. Rubio said “DACA… applies to young people that arrived in this country at a very young age before they were adults and I don’t think we can immediately revoke that… I’m not calling for it to be revoked tomorrow, or this week, or right away.”

“I think it will have to end at some point and I hope it will end because of some reform to the immigration laws,” Rubio said in English.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T77sLD1pei4

As Breitbart News has previously explained, this is the same policy supported by Barack Obama: namely that the President ought to leave the executive amnesty for DREAMers in place until Congress submits to the order by legislatively ratifying amnesty. After a legislatively ratified DREAM Act, illegal aliens would be able to vote in U.S. elections and bring their relatives to work and collect entitlements in the United States.

Indeed, even the similarity of Rubio’s rhetoric to that of President Obama’s is striking. President Obama told Congress: “if folks are serious about getting immigration reform done [they should be] passing a bill and getting it to my desk. And then the executive actions that I take go away.”

Another striking feature of Rubio’s declarations regarding DACA is that, like much of Rubio’s rhetoric, he relies on repeat verbal constructions that have the effect of sounding highly rehearsed.

In November of last year, Rubio elaborated on his support for DREAMer amnesty. Rubio told reporters at Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire that his “ideal way” of transitioning out of Obama’s amnesty would be for it to be “replaced by a reform system that creates an alternative.”

“The ideal way for it to end is that it’s replaced by a reform system that creates an alternative,” Rubio said.

In other words, Rubio is saying that there is no situation in which illegal aliens are not authorized to fill American jobs. In Rubio’s mind, it is just a question of when the legalization transitions from an executive amnesty to a legislative amnesty.



—

While Rubio dismissed Cruz’s assertion as “lies,” Rubio noticeably declined to say whether he would immediately terminate Obama’s DREAMer amnesty. Rubio also avoided addressing Cruz’s correct assertion that Rubio “right now supports citizenship for 12 million people here illegally.”

Similarly, none of the debate moderators challenged Rubio on the substance of Cruz’s claim– nor anything else of substantive on the subject of immigration. Neither John Dickerson, Major Garrett nor Kimberley Strassel of the open borders Wall Street Journal editorial board asked Rubio whether he would rescind DACA immediately.

Instead, Major Garrett asked Rubio if he could “define amnesty.” However, in his questioning, Garrett failed to note that Rubio had offered an amnesty bill in 2013– in essence, Garrett gave pro-amnesty Rubio a free opportunity to explain how he is allegedly not for amnesty—just as he did throughout his Gang of Eight push.

John Dickerson asked Rubio: “Is it the case that in your list of accomplishments you can’t mention that [i.e. the Gang of Eight’s immigration reform]?” Rubio replied by saying that the Gang of Eight’s so-called “immigration reform” was not an accomplishment because “it didn’t pass.”

Dickerson did not follow up with his question to explain that the Gang of Eight did pass the Senate and would have passed the House if not but for a grassroots rebellion against the plan. Dickerson similarly failed to point out that Rubio still supports all of the substantive policies outlined in the Gang of Eight bill.

As Trump’s Senior Policy Adviser Stephen Miller has explained, there are “three core provisions to the Gang of Eight bill: (1) citizenship for illegal aliens, (2) massive expansions of foreign guest worker programs, and (3) large expansions to the rate of permanent annual immigration. He [Rubio] is in favor of and is campaigning in favor… of all three of those provisions. Everything else is just details. That’s the core essence of the Gang of Eight bill, that’s the core essence of Rubio’s immigration platform today, that is the core essence of what he’ll do as President.”

“The one consistent through line of his [Rubio’s] career, it is that every decision appears to be perfectly calculated to try and open America’s borders,” Miller has said. He is the “front man for the open borders syndicate… Rubio is determined to finish what he started with the Gang of Eight bill and to be President Obama’s third term on immigration.”



Miller explained that the reason Rubio can’t apologize for his role in pushing Obama’s immigration agenda through the Senate is because “he believes to this day in everything that’s in the Gang of 8 bill and wants to be in the Oval Office so that he can implement everything in the Gang of 8 bill… The reality is that Rubio is proud of the Gang of 8 bill. And his pride for the product, for the contents of the product, is so intense that he can’t bring himself to even pretend to be remorseful about it.”

Phyllis Schlafly has pointed out that “Rubio’s entire career rests on the fact that no one will question his syrupy scripted bites and homeroom-president style rehearsed speeches… Rubio would have a much, much better chance than Obama of getting an open borders bill through Congress — while Boehner could refuse to bring up Obama’s mass immigration/amnesty bill for vote in 2014, Ryan would never refuse Rubio’s bill. Rubio’s presence, as it did with the Gang of Eight, would create the cover for both certain Republicans and all Democrats to get behind a far more open borders plan… There is likely no person in the United States of America in a better position to enact mass immigration legislation than a President Rubio.”

Rubio’s demonstrably false declaration tonight regarding his record on executive amnesty could arguably be a campaign-ending misstep. However, Fox News’ enthusiastic reception of another Rubio debate performance in which he concealed his immigration record suggests that corporate media will be able to paint over the remarkable moment and can continue to boost Rubio’s floundering campaign.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/14/interview-transcript-proves-rubio-promised-hispanics-en-espanol-hed-keep-executive-amnesty-place/

[Joshua01]

The whole political process is corrupt and needs to be called out!



Called out by whom?....to whom???

[mick silver]

I have a thread about how all this shit is rigged ,if you have time go read it you may learn somethinghttp://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/10982796_888298131234345_6454458795617355746_n4-320x215.jpg (http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/10982796_888298131234345_6454458795617355746_n4.jp g)

[EE_]

Called out by whom?....to whom???

There's only one person right now that has the media's ear and the balls to call them out, Trump!