PDA

View Full Version : Latest Version of Monopoly is Called “Ultimate Banking” and is Completely Cashless



mick silver
16th February 2016, 09:44 AM
Latest Version of Monopoly is Called “Ultimate Banking” and is Completely CashlessSource: Liberty Blitzkrieg (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/02/16/latest-version-of-monopoly-is-called-ultimate-banking-and-is-completely-cashless/#more-31506)

The war on cash has been in the works for a very, very long time, but the propaganda campaign to convince an always gullible public to accept the scheme seems to have been hatched in earnest late last spring. For example, here are a few excerpts from the post, Martin Armstrong Reports on a Secret Meeting in London to Ban Cash (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/05/26/martin-armstrong-reports-on-a-secret-meeting-in-london-to-ban-cash/):

Martin Armstrong noted at the time:
I find it extremely perplexing that I have been the only one to report that there is a secret meeting (http://armstrongeconomics.com/archives/30145) in London where Kenneth Rogoff of Harvard University and Willem Butler the chief economist at Citigroup will address the central banks and advocate the elimination of all cash to bring to fruition the day when you cannot buy or sell anything without government approval. When I Googled the issue to see who has picked it up yet, to my surprise Armstrong Economics comes up first. Others (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/why-the-powers-that-be-are-pushing-a-cashless-society.html) are quoting me, and I even find it spreading as the Central Bank of Nigeria (http://www.cenbank.org/cashless/), but I have yet to find reports on the meeting taking place in London when my sources are direct.
Other newspapers who have covered my European tour have stated that the “crash” of which I speak is the typical stock market rather than in government. What is concerning me is the silence on this meeting where there are more and more reports about a cashless society would be better.
If we look at the the turning points on the ECM, yes they have been to the day when there has been a concentration of capital in a particular market. However, it has also picked the turning points in political decisions such as the formation of the G5 with 1985.65, the very day Greece asked for help from the IMF in 2010, to the day of 911. What we better keep one eye open for here at night is this birth of a cashless society coming in much faster than expected. Why the secret meeting? Something does not smell right here.
To which I added my own observation:

In the mind of an economic tyrant, banning cash represents the holy grail. Forcing the plebs onto a system of digital fiat currency transactions offers total control via a seamless tracking of all transactions in the economy, and the ability to block payments if an uppity citizen dares get out of line.
Moving along, today the world had the unfortunate experience of its attention being turned toward the malicious and authoritarian mindset of none other than Larry Summers. Bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-16/summers-calls-for-g-20-pact-on-banknote-limit-as-low-as-50) reports:

Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers urged countries around the world to agree to stop issuing high-denomination banknotes, adding his voice to intensifying criticism of a practice alleged by police to abet crime and corruption.
Summers’s call coincides with a review by the European Central Bank of its 500-euro ($558) note, whose future now looks increasingly uncertain. President Mario Draghi repeated this week that the institution was considering withdrawing the euro area’s most valuable bill to avoid aiding criminals.
“Even better than unilateral measures in Europe would be a global agreement to stop issuing notes worth more than say $50 or $100,” Summers said on his blog (http://larrysummers.com/2016/02/16/its-time-to-go-after-big-money/) on Tuesday. “Such an agreement would be as significant as anything else the G-7 or G-20 has done in years.”

For now, “I’d guess the idea of removing existing notes is a step too far,” Summers wrote. “But a moratorium on printing new high-denomination notes would make the world a better place.”
First of all, why is this discredited buffoon still paraded around everywhere as if he’s an authority on anything other than hubris and ineptitude? The fact that fossils like Larry Summers still have such a prevalent voice amongst world leaders is precisely what Americans are revolting against in their support of Trump and Sanders.
Second, the incredible irony in all of this is that while banning cash would merely make life inconvenient for petty criminals, it would making government economic tyranny and elitist theft exponentially easier. Crime agains average people would explode as a result. It reminds me of the quote attributed to Aesop:

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office.
Interestingly, it appears Monopoly is ahead of the curve on this one. Indeed, while I first saw Monopoly move to “electronic banking” over three years ago, the board game’s latest iteration which will be released this summer, takes it to a whole new level.
As Gizmodo (http://toyland.gizmodo.com/monopoly-ultimate-banking-eliminates-cash-with-a-tiny-a-1759240688?utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=Toyland_twitter) reports:

Is there anything worse in a game of Monopoly than thinking you’ve bankrupted another player only to discover they have a secret stash of cash hidden away? That’s no longer an option with the new Monopoly Ultimate Banking edition that uses a tiny ATM to keep track of every last financial transaction.
It’s not the first time that Hasbro Gaming has tried to speed up the game of Monopoly by replacing cash with credit cards and an electronic banking unit. But ironically the company’s past efforts actually slowed the game down because players had to manually type in dollar amounts on an awkward keypad.
But the compact banking unit in the Monopoly Ultimate Banking edition is able to quickly scan not only each player’s credit card, but all of the individual property and chance cards in the game which now include special bar codes on them.

The latest version of the game, which will be available in the fall for $25, also mixes things up with new chance cards called Life events that can cause rents across the board to fluctuate, or other sudden financial changes that are really only easy to implement thanks to the game’s much-improved electronic ultimate banking unit.
Take note of the line “or other sudden financial changes that are really only easy to implement thanks to the game’s much-improved electronic ultimate banking unit.”
You know, like negative interest rates and deleting your entire bank account without warning, for example.
“Ultimate” banking indeed. As the game’s cover suggests, the idea is to “own it all,” and they aren’t talking about you.
Oh, and don’t think they aren’t coming for Bitcoin too. As Andreas Antonopoulos noted:

Government say they are worried that criminals will use bitcoin.
In truth, they are terrified that all the rest of us will.
— AndreasMAntonopoulos (@aantonop) February 16, 2016 (https://twitter.com/aantonop/status/699610460279197697)

Share This Article...

mick silver
16th February 2016, 10:13 AM
Navigate to ... Home About Audio– Podcasts– Interviews– Film, Literature & The New World Order– Questions For Corbett– The Well-Read Anarchist– Radio Videos Articles– Newsletter Membership DVDs Contact Login RSS Cash Wars: The People Strike Back? (https://www.corbettreport.com/cash-wars-the-people-strike-back/)Corbett (https://www.corbettreport.com/author/admin/) • 02/17/2016 • 1 Comment (https://www.corbettreport.com/cash-wars-the-people-strike-back/#comments)
https://www.corbettreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/500-note-draghi-780x439-300x169.jpg (https://www.corbettreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/500-note-draghi-780x439.jpg)by James Corbett
TheInternationalForecaster.com
February 16, 2016
You might remember that a couple of weeks ago we launched an open source investigation (https://www.corbettreport.com/the-war-on-cash-a-country-by-country-guide/) into the war on cash. As I noted at the time, the investigation was spurred by an uptick in anti-cash rhetoric over the last few months from the media, from central bankers and from politicians. Since that investigation took place, however, things have gotten even more in-your-face.
Just four days after we started the investigation Bloomberg came out with an op-ed urging the banksters to “Bring On the Cashless Future (http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2016-01-31/bring-on-the-cashless-future).”
Four days after that PayPal kicked off their anti-cash, “PayPal is New Money (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dF9t_xQGks)” advertising campaign at the Super Bowl.
And in the latest move the ECB is now officially considering scrapping the 500 euro note (http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/15/news/500-euro-bill-banknote/), a move that some worry is just the first step toward limiting cash purchases or eliminating it all together.
“There is a pervasive and increasing conviction in the world of public opinion that high denomination banknotes are used for criminal purposes … It’s in this context that we are considering action,” ECB President Mario Draghi told a journalist in response to a question about the European Council’s recent resolution (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/02/12-conclusions-terrorism-financing/) to “consider appropriate measures” regarding the future of the 500 euro note.
https://www.corbettreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/mahrer.jpg (https://www.corbettreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/mahrer.jpg)Harald Mahrer is one of the people warning about the move, and he’s not just your average Joe. He’s a Deputy in the Economic Ministry of the Austrian government. “We don’t want someone to be able to track digitally what we buy, eat and drink, what books we read and what movies we watch,” he told (http://oe1.orf.at/artikel/431967) Austrian public radio station Oe1 last week. He argues that the ability to use cash should be a constitutional right for Austrians.
Mahrer is just reflecting what an increasing number of people are beginning to realize: that cash transactions are a key to maintaining anonymity. Heck, when even mainstream propaganda outlets like Slate.com are running pieces making the case that “cash is a classic privacy protection (http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2016/02/15/austrian_deputy_economy_minister_harald_mahrer_say s_people_should_have_right.html)” (in direct contradiction to their earlier anti-cash propaganda (http://www.slate.com/articles/business/cashless_society/2012/03/living_without_cash_does_it_lead_you_to_spend_more _or_less_.html)) you know the would-be Gods of Money still have a way to go to convince the public to part ways with paper.
But more than just privacy protection, the true importance of cash becomes apparent in times of banking crisis. Just witness when Greece started clamping down (http://www.wsj.com/articles/greek-banks-reopen-their-doors-1437376273) on cash withdrawals during their banking panic and people began literally stuffing it under the mattress (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-20/it-really-looks-like-greeks-are-hiding-cash-under-the-mattress). It is no coincidence that we are moving into a time of global economic uncertainty being frontrun by (what else?) a banking crisis in Europe (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-02-16/european-bank-nightmare-far-from-over-as-fines-and-fintech-loom).
https://www.corbettreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/500euro-300x169.jpg (https://www.corbettreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/500euro.jpg)On this front, at least, it seems like Mahrer and the forces of common sense might actually be beating back the banksters. Draghi for his part had to almost immediately back off of his cash demonizing comments. He came out on Monday (http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/draghi-denies-ecb-waging-war-on-cash-with-big-banknote-review/41962370) to clarify that the potential scrapping of the 500 euro bill is only about cracking down on money laundering and has nothing to do with an attempt to limit cash transactions.
Trust him as far as you can throw him, but at the very least his backpedaling shows that the banksters have not yet got public opinion on their side on the war on cash. For the time being, anyway