PDA

View Full Version : Trump Already Surrounding Himself With Establishment Men



guess who
4th March 2016, 11:03 PM
Trump has named as top National Security Advisor, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Richard Haass.

For those who don't know, The Council on Foreign Relations literally is an establishment institution. You can't get more establishment than the CFR.

...Giuliani.....Christie....Haass....Sessions....

This is supposed to be anti-establishment?

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/trump-already-surrounding-himself-with-establishment-men

This is what happen when you are rich but alone with no party or movement of your own, no plan, no platform but you are ambitious then the system just swallows you.

midnight rambler
5th March 2016, 01:21 AM
Richard Haass, joo.

Shami-Amourae
5th March 2016, 01:32 AM
Trump has named as top National Security Advisor, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Richard Haass.

For those who don't know, The Council on Foreign Relations literally is an establishment institution. You can't get more establishment than the CFR.

...Giuliani.....Christie....Haass....Sessions....

This is supposed to be anti-establishment?

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/trump-already-surrounding-himself-with-establishment-men

This is what happen when you are rich but alone with no party or movement of your own, no plan, no platform but you are ambitious then the system just swallows you.

This:
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?88336-Ron-Paul-%93Absolutely-No-Meaningful-Difference-Between-Hillary-and-Trump%94&p=821323&viewfull=1#post821323

You're obviously a noob.

Trump is our only shot of getting someone right-wing (or perceived) in the White House. It pushes the overton window to the right. It also opens up Nationalism to the Republican party, that's why Jews are flipping their shit.

Nationalism is the opposite of Globalism. Ron Paul thinks we shouldn't have borders. He's just Globalism light.

hoarder
5th March 2016, 06:12 AM
Trump is our only shot of getting someone right-wing (or perceived) in the White House. Why do you think it would be any different than having GW Bush in the White House? If he got elected, the discourse would change to War! War! War! in the Middle East. All the "right wing" stuff would end election day.

Neuro
5th March 2016, 06:39 AM
Why do you think it would be any different than having GW Bush in the White House? If he got elected, the discourse would change to War! War! War! in the Middle East. All the "right wing" stuff would end election day.
He does seem to thrive on conflict! But it doesn't seem that any of the other candidates would be for less war...

vacuum
5th March 2016, 06:46 AM
Why do you think it would be any different than having GW Bush in the White House? If he got elected, the discourse would change to War! War! War! in the Middle East. All the "right wing" stuff would end election day.

He's been talking for 20 - 30 years about our trade deficits and fixing healthcare. Those are two things he really cares about. Immigration and bringing jobs back too.

Who knows if military conflicts will happen, but I guarantee you he is not looking for them. If anything it would be a cold-war type scenario because china would be pissed that we aren't giving them hundreds of billions of dollars and they may get aggressive towards us.

hoarder
5th March 2016, 06:59 AM
He does seem to thrive on conflict! Isn't that a Jewish trait?
But it doesn't seem that any of the other candidates would be for less war...You seem to be caught in the trap of thinking that what candidates say have anything to do with what they will do. The fact is, the masses will associate Trumpstein with blond haired-blue eyed White males and TPTB will take full advantage of that by having him play a demon role. The only reason they would put him in the White House is to make him the centerpiece of WW3.


He's been talking for 20 - 30 years about our trade deficits and fixing healthcare. Those are two things he really cares about. What a candidate says is words. What he cares about is entirely unknown.


Who knows if military conflicts will happen, but I guarantee you he is not looking for them. Is that guarantee worth any more than a politicians word?

EE_
5th March 2016, 07:13 AM
The numbers for all these nine states holding primaries from March 5 to March 15 all show Trump ahead of his rivals, based on individual polls or RealClearPolitics polling averages.

● On Saturday, March 5, Kansas will hold its Republican caucus where 40 delegates are at stake. Trump is up 12 points here.

● On the same day, Kentucky and Louisiana will hold their Republican primaries. Forty-five delegates are at stake in Kentucky where Trump is up 13 points.

● Forty-seven delegates are at stake in Louisiana where Trump is up 19 points.

● On Tuesday, March 8, Michigan and Mississippi will hold their Republican primaries. In Michigan, 59 delegates are at stake for the winner. Trump is up 15.4 points here.

● In Mississippi, 40 delegates are up for grabs. Trump is up 24 points here.

● On March 15, four states—Florida, Illinois, North Carolina and Ohio—hold their Republican primaries. The biggest prize is in Florida where the winner will take all its 99 delegates. Trump is up 18.7 points—well ahead of Florida Sen. Marco Rubio.

● Illinois has 69 delegates up for grabs. Trump is up 15.5 points here.

● North Carolina offers 72 delegates. Trump is up 10.3 points here as well.

● Ohio has 66 delegates all going to the winner. Trump is up five points ahead of Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

collector
5th March 2016, 07:15 AM
Maybe he's cutting a deal with the GOP - they back off somewhat if he puts some of their NWO minions in place to bring him up to speed

Neuro
5th March 2016, 10:27 AM
Isn't that a Jewish trait? You seem to be caught in the trap of thinking that what candidates say have anything to do with what they will do. The fact is, the masses will associate Trumpstein with blond haired-blue eyed White males and TPTB will take full advantage of that by having him play a demon role. No I didn't fall into that trap. We don't know what Trump will do once in office. I suspect he may be controlled opposition, his role in birthergate would suggest so, but I am not sure. With HiLIARy we know that she will probably start a few wars, as she was the main factor in two already. NATO wars on Libya and Serbia and probably she also played a significant role in escalating the conflict in Syria to full civil war. She is a demon, with Trump we can't be sure, but he sure seem to thrive on conflict...

Joshua01
5th March 2016, 10:32 AM
Why do you think it would be any different than having GW Bush in the White House? If he got elected, the discourse would change to War! War! War! in the Middle East. All the "right wing" stuff would end election day.
You can say that about any of these guys. When was the last time we weren't fighting in a war? How many presidents have we gone through since then? The whole argument has not point to it. No one knows who the next president will be who actually rejects war as an option

hoarder
5th March 2016, 10:45 AM
Historically, wars are the realm of the right wing, especially in image. It has been the left who has preached pacifism and peace. In reality, we've had wars with both parties, the only difference is that the right has done most of the saber-rattling.
Our rulers want us to focus on left vs. right. They don't want us to realize they're the same. That said, all wars done while the left is in power are done more quietly.
Sure, we're going to have war no matter who gets elected. The issue is intensity. They have to make it look right. For an all out, no holds barred WW3, they need a fall guy on the inside. Someone for everyone to hate, and they will. The best candidate for such a position is an Aryan-looking Khazar, because the whole world will then hate blond-haired, blue-eyed men, thus manufacturing the consent to finish them off.

midnight rambler
5th March 2016, 10:52 AM
Trump has named as top National Security Advisor, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Richard Haass.

For those who don't know, The Council on Foreign Relations literally is an establishment institution. You can't get more establishment than the CFR.

...Giuliani.....Christie....Haass....Sessions....

This is supposed to be anti-establishment?

http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/trump-already-surrounding-himself-with-establishment-men

This is what happen when you are rich but alone with no party or movement of your own, no plan, no platform but you are ambitious then the system just swallows you.

I'm thinking that perhaps you missed the date of the article you posted. Yes, Trump met with Haass last August but when the inquiry was made recently to Haass the response was that he was not Trump's adviser.

I'm thinking that Trump is just being cagey.

Joshua01
5th March 2016, 10:57 AM
I'm thinking that perhaps you missed the date of the article you posted. Yes, Trump met with Haass last August but when the inquiry was made recently to Haass the response was that he was not Trump's adviser.

I'm thinking that Trump is just being cagey.

...or maybe the OP, being a new user, is simply working for the anti Trump crowd and wants to plant some shit out there

keehah
23rd April 2023, 08:27 AM
Warp Speed overtone window shift!

Two year old CNN/MSNBC Covid deaths fake news terrorism in support of the murder and maiming of Americans and to place blame on the right and 'muh freedoms' states is current year Trump MAGA:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XoQdR1zuK94

An0moly has a different clip at original speed that he starts this video with:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NFEl6UaPTbM

Additionally, starting at 32min An0moly has good comment on the pathetic state of much of current year right-wing content creators' embracing of cuckservatism, distraction, degeneracy and cowardice.