Log in

View Full Version : Rafael is not eligible to be prez



EE_
8th March 2016, 05:51 AM
Maybe why Trump wants to go one on one with the Canadian.

I have to laugh at all these ploys to stop Trump. Some of the republican establishment say they will support Hillary in a general election before Trump. They don't even care that Hillary will appoint a very liberal judge to supreme court justice, or that there will never be a republican president again, ever!. These people are not republicans, they don't care about the party, they only care about their jobs.

The Fox Democrap town hall was a joke yesterday. Not one question about the biggest campaign issue, immigration, why?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHWtCbvEptw

JohnQPublic
8th March 2016, 06:02 AM
Everyone is brain dead on this issue. I brought it up on the National Review website. I immediately was called out as a conspiracy theorist and tin hatter. I am having a little fun arguing it, but it is also sad that the constitution is so ignored. I am characterizing this as a choice between a crazy candidate (Trump) of shredding the constitution (Cruz or possibly Rubio). It is a forced dichotomy, and many republicans are choosing to shred the constitution.

midnight rambler
8th March 2016, 06:35 AM
a choice between a crazy candidate (Trump)

Exactly what is it that has you concluding that Trump is 'crazy'?

midnight rambler
8th March 2016, 06:56 AM
Not one question about the biggest campaign issue, immigration, why?

Actually, the biggest campaign issue for Killary is: When do you think you will be going to prison?

JohnQPublic
8th March 2016, 07:33 AM
Exactly what is it that has you concluding that Trump is 'crazy'?

I referred to him as a "crazy character" (on NR). I have not concluded he is "bad" or "evil", but he certainly comes across as a little crazy due to his outrageous personality. In the end I may support him in the primaries. I cannot support any Demon-crat, and will not support any candidate that disrespects the constitution, so my choices are limited. I do like some of what crazy Donald is doing for sure, and I do respect him for that- basically shaking up the corrupt political class. We are witnessing the collapse of the current war mongering establishment, and hopefully we can bring some good out of that.

Spectrism
8th March 2016, 09:54 AM
Everyone is brain dead on this issue. I brought it up on the National Review website. I immediately was called out as a conspiracy theorist and tin hatter. I am having a little fun arguing it, but it is also sad that the constitution is so ignored. I am characterizing this as a choice between a crazy candidate (Trump) of shredding the constitution (Cruz or possibly Rubio). It is a forced dichotomy, and many republicans are choosing to shred the constitution.


The people of this country- and most others... are just plain stupid. People don't care about laws. What matters is how they feel. We are damned.

collector
8th March 2016, 10:20 AM
Everyone is brain dead on this issue. I brought it up on the National Review website. I immediately was called out as a conspiracy theorist and tin hatter. I am having a little fun arguing it, but it is also sad that the constitution is so ignored. I am characterizing this as a choice between a crazy candidate (Trump) of shredding the constitution (Cruz or possibly Rubio). It is a forced dichotomy, and many republicans are choosing to shred the constitution.

Here too;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-95slpIMAE

madfranks
8th March 2016, 11:03 AM
The people of this country- and most others... are just plain stupid. People don't care about laws. What matters is how they feel. We are damned.

Yep. And I know this is off topic, but here in Colorado a bill to allow so-called "constitutional carry" that is, letting you carry a concealed gun without a license, just got shot down due to legislators' feelings. No discussion on the Constitution, no discussion of people's rights, just how they feel. This is definitely dangerous territory, and I fear for my kids' future for sure.

palani
8th March 2016, 12:27 PM
'bama is not eligible to be president without the intervention of the (un)civil war. As the restriction has (apparently) been eliminated for him (concerning birth location that is) why would anyone presume that this same restriction is in effect for anyone of the white persuasion?

When you throw the baby out with the bathwater whatever consequences resulting should have been carefully considered beforehand. Act in haste repent at leisure.