Donald Trump and Jeremy Corbyn: Fighting the Jewish Establishment

[mick silver]

Donald Trump and Jeremy Corbyn: Fighting the Jewish Establishment (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/04/donald-trump-and-jeremy-corbyn-fighting-the-jewish-establishment/) April 4, 2016 |
Francis Carr Begbie (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/author/francis-carr-begbie/)
It is hard to think of two politicians further apart than Britain’s Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and Donald Trump. Corbyn is a Marxist class warrior steeped in identity politics while Trump is, well, Trump.
The similarity is in who they have managed to antagonise. For both have incurred the wrath of the media through the perception that they are not totally beholden to Jewish political priorities.
Since the moment Jeremy Corbyn became leader of the opposition in Britain in September, he has undergone a media demonization (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11879662/Why-Jeremy-Corbyns-rise-makes-British-Jews-afraid.html) that is surely unprecedented in its intensity and duration. Like phosphorous bombs on Gaza, the abuse rains down on him from all points on the compass, day after day (http://forward.com/news/320934/why-jeremy-corbyn-scares-so-many-british-jews/). It is hard to keep up with all the accusations but broadly, Corbyn is accused of harbouring or sympathising with “anti-semitism (http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/1.711484)” which is defined as previous association with Islamic preachers, sympathy with the Palestinian cause and his insistence that the Iraq war was a criminal mistake. It has now reached the stage where ‘anti-semitism in the Labour Party (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/mar/18/labour-antisemitism-jews-jeremy-corbyn)’ is a bigger daily story than the impending referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Union.
All the elements of Jewish communal defence have been mobilized in this campaign but it has been spearheaded by the British Board of Deputies and the main Jewish newspaper, the Jewish Chronicle. The Jewish vigilante group, the CST have weighed in (http://www.algemeiner.com/2016/03/24/antisemitism-jeremy-corbyn-and-the-uk-labour-party/).
How did this happen? Corbyn is probably the most left-wing leader Labour has ever had and a believer that borders are a thing of the past. He would flood Britain with refugees tomorrow, if he could. Read more » (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/04/donald-trump-and-jeremy-corbyn-fighting-the-jewish-establishment/#more-35252)

Posted in British politics (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/category/british-politics/) 13 Comments (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/04/donald-trump-and-jeremy-corbyn-fighting-the-jewish-establishment/#comments)

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/uploads/observations.jpg Comment on White genocide/White dispossession (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/04/comment-on-white-genocidewhite-dispossession/) April 5, 2016 | Author: Tom Sunic, Ph.D. (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/author/tomsunic/)
I am aware of the troubling issues surrounding the ongoing White dispossession in the USA and EU. I also understand Bob Whitaker’s concern about my/AFP suggestion to drop the expression “White genocide” and replace it with “White dispossession” instead. I am also saddened at Mr. Whitaker’s disapproval with our current support of Donald Trump’s campaign.
I did indicate to HuffPo (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-american-freedom-party-emails_us_5702b470e4b0a06d580659c7) that the expression “White genocide” sounds too strong. This is because for many people ‘genocide’ connotes an organized campaign of murder rather than the gradual replacement and disempowerment which is actually occurring. It is unquestionably true that the current process will indeed result in White genocide in the long run as Whites become an ever decreasing percentage of the population. This genocidal process is being facilitated by the fact that Whites are persecuted if they publicize any sense of White identity and interests. It is also true that miscegenation rates have risen in recent decades, and these trends will likely increase in the future if current trends continue and as Whites become an embattled, hated minority. This is genocide by any reasonable definition.
The prospect of White genocide is staring us in the face and motivates our actions, and this vision also motivates our enemies for whom a dwindling, disempowered White population holds infinite appeal. But as a political party, we have to sell our ideas to the public, and this is a non-starter for most people. They look around and see White politicians with great power (e.g., all of the current presidential candidates and very large majorities in both Houses of Congress), and they see that there are many Whites among corporate and professional leaders. Whites are still very much part of the establishment. We don’t see White people being marched off to concentration camps.

[mick silver]

The term ‘genocide’ is therefore problematic in the current cultural context. I also note that in all European languages, the word “genocide” is a verbal construct that first appeared in the wake of World War II. It was coined by the Polish-Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphael_Lemkin) in 1944 and subsequently became an important pivot in UN legislation. As a result of its origins in Jewish ethnic activism, the word ‘genocide’ often has strong, subjective, ethnocentric and frequently self-serving goals. Over the last 70 years it has given birth to an array of numerous, often mutually competing (often exaggerated) victimhoods and commemorations.
Given these competing ethnic interests, it is not surprising that there is often little agreement on what genocide is. Legal quarrelling about the definition of ‘genocide’ seems endless. This can be seen in the decades-long Hague proceedings on the events following the break-up of ex-Yugoslavia in 1991 — the investigations into mass murder and the many trials and acquittals. The Hague Tribunal has had hard time defining/labeling as “genocide” a single large-scale mass murder that took place in Bosnia in 1993 — as the prosecution often demands — without however sounding partial in the eyes and the ears of the defence or the warring party that carried out a specific mass murder.
At this stage, I think it is more appropriate for the AFP, including friendly, patriotic- minded Americans of European heritage to use the locutions “White advocates” to describe ourselves and “White dispossession” to describe the process we are fighting against.
Share:

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/images/default/16/printfriendly.png (http://www.printfriendly.com/print/new?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoccidentalobserver.net %2F2016%2F04%2Fcomment-on-white-genocidewhite-dispossession%2F)
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/images/default/16/digg.png (http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoccidentalobserver.net%2F2 016%2F04%2Fcomment-on-white-genocidewhite-dispossession%2F&title=Comment%20on%20White%20genocide%2FWhite%20di spossession&bodytext=I%20am%20aware%20of%20the%20troubling%20i ssues%20surrounding%C2%A0the%20ongoing%20White%20d ispossession%20in%20the%20USA%20and%20EU.%20I%20al so%20understand%20Bob%C2%A0Whitaker%E2%80%99s%20co ncern%20about%20my%2FAFP%20suggestion%20to%20drop% 20the%20expression%20%E2%80%9CWhite%20genocide%E2% 80%9D%20and%20replace%20it%20with%20%E2%80%9CWhite %20dispossess)
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/images/default/16/facebook.png (http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoccidentalobserver .net%2F2016%2F04%2Fcomment-on-white-genocidewhite-dispossession%2F&t=Comment%20on%20White%20genocide%2FWhite%20dispos session)
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/images/default/16/twitter.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=Comment%20on%20White%20genocide%2FWhit e%20dispossession%20-%20http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoccidentalobserver.net%2F20 16%2F04%2Fcomment-on-white-genocidewhite-dispossession%2F)

[mick silver]

The Trump Effect March 31, 2016 — 56 Comments (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/03/the-trump-effect/#comments)
Richard McCulloch (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/author/richardmcculloch/)
What do the detestable George Will and Rich Lowry have in common with the execrable Tim Wise and Bill Ayers? Answer: fanatical opposition to Donald Trump, to the point of regarding Trump supporters as enemies. Why not? They all share something in common at the core of their beings: they are all anti-White.
Will held forth on the March 20 edition of Fox News Sunday:

The problem is this, not only are his [Trump’s] negatives — 61 percent, almost doubled his positives, 32 percent, but he’s appealing entirely to white people. Now, in 1988, George Herbert Walker Bush got 59 percent of the white vote which was high and that translated in 426 electorate votes. Mitt Romney in 2012 got 59 percent of the white vote, that translated into 206 electoral votes. Romney got 17 percent, that is all, of the non-white vote. Trump, by every measure, would do worse than that which means he would have to get not just the 65 percent of the white vote to win that Ronald Reagan got sweeping 49 states, he would have to get 70 percent of the white vote. A, it won’t happen and B, it would destroy the Republican Party by making it the party of white people.



Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/toq-ad-500x200.jpg (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/subscribe-to-toq/)
When host Chris Wallace noted that Trump was expanding the GOP by bringing in more independents and democrats and asked whether these new supporters could be accepted into a “big tent” Republican Party Will responded:
It cannot expand that far and remain a conservative party which means it would be — if he’s the nominee, there would be no conservative running in the race and the Vichy Republicans who are coming to terms with — as collaborators with the takeover of their party ought to understand that.
Will also called for a Will, Lowry & Co.-approved conservative candidate to run on a third party ticket. It’s too bad frequent panelist Laura Ingraham wasn’t there. No one does a better George Will smackdown than she does, and he really deserved the full Ingraham treatment this time.
So now for Will and his ilk, conservatives who support Trump are “Vichy Republicans” and “collaborators,” i.e., traitors and enemies. Purges to follow. Seems like Trump is really shaking the tree. I wonder who else will fall out.
Imagine the Republican Party getting 70 percent of the White vote and becoming the party of White people. For Will this would destroy the Republican Party. Maybe for him, but not for us. He might be homeless, but he should be able to find new digs, perhaps a cave, or a doghouse, or even some rock to crawl under. But Will’s nightmare is our dream come true, much better even than the creation of a new third party for White people. Let the anti-white Republicans form their own third party instead of us.
The detestable George Will’s condemnation of Trump supporters as his enemies is very similar to the execrable Tim Wise’s March 1 rant on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153338275145969&id=140254320968):

White people: this is the moment of truth. Will we choose multiracial democracy or white nationalism? Know this: if you support Donald Trump or would even consider voting for him for president, you have chosen the latter. You are my enemy. I will not seek to co-exist with you. I will not make nice. I will not pretend we believe in the same things but merely have different opinions about how to get there. You are the enemy, plain and simple. And you must be stopped. You must lose and not just by a little. By a lot. A crushing defeat that leaves no doubt in your mind that the country you prefer is gone and is never coming back. … De-friend me now. You do not believe in decency or justice or democracy. And you are beyond reason.
Wise’s vitriolic rant (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/11/tim-wise-hates-white-people/)after the 2010 midterm elections was spiteful triumphalist gloating after what he claimed was a minor and temporary setback. His tone in this rant has changed. Now he is grim rather than triumphalist, and more threatening than gloating. He is going to war against anyone who supports Trump. What will this mean if Trump actually becomes president? Will this extremely biased anti-white activist still be a paid consultant on “hate groups” for police departments across the country, when he will have essentially defined the majority of voters, and the great majority of white voters, as haters by his standard?
And now we have the return of Bill Ayers, like it’s 1970 all over again, back to his old Racial Marxist Weatherman antics, involved with (http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2016/03/obama-buddy-bill-ayers-in-the-thick-of-friday-nights-trump-protest-in-chicago.html) a coalition of students and non-Whites to repress rebellion among the White masses, shutting down the Trump rally at the U of Illinois-Chicago where he teaches —are you ready for this? — education. It’s fitting that he’s sharing the same bed with Will, Lowry and Wise. Politics makes strange bedfellows, especially anti-White politics.
Ayers has more of a personal stake in this than the others. It was in his living room that Obama launched his political career. When Obama ran for president he was heralded as a transformative figure, both symbolizing and causing the transformation of America and the West away from Whiteness and toward a Brown future. So the anti-White elites in Europe hailed the dawning of the new non-White age and gave him the Nobel Peace Prize before he even had time to foul the Oval Office.
But then along comes Trump spoiling everything, the anti-Obama who represents the repudiation of Obama and everything he and his 2008 victory represented. A Trump victory would be a White victory, demonstrating to the world that we’re still here and haven’t been beaten yet. No wonder Ayers and Wise and the race traitors of Europe are in high dudgeon, while Will is apoplectic at the thought that the GOP might gain 70 percent of the White vote. That would really ruin his day.
Eleanor Clift says (http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/03/05/clift-trump-tapped-into-a-vein-of-misogyny-and-hate-and-white-supremacy/) “Trump is just doing explicitly what that — what the party has practiced implicitly, and now, it’s all coming apart.” Sounds like she’s been reading Kevin MacDonald on implicit Whiteness (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/category/implicit-whiteness/).
Trump’s first surge in the polls and the findings of a study (https://people.stanford.edu/dbroock/sites/default/files/ahler_broockman_ideological_innocence.pdf) by political scientists from UC-Berkeley and Stanford, Douglas Ahler and David Broockman, on attitudes toward immigration, which both occurred at almost the same time, greatly revised my measure of the state of the White race (also discussed here (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/08/donald-trumps-breakthrough-statement-on-immigration/)). With some adjustments for the racial composition of their sample, the Ahler and Broockman study suggests that around 55% of Whites supported the options of stopping illegal immigration, deporting illegal immigrants and greatly reducing or halting legal immigration. This compares to the 17% pf Whites who supported (open borders, amnesty, and unlimited immigration).
Trump is not engaging in any persuasion or argument to change people’s minds. He is not that type of leadership figure. It’s not about Trump. It’s about his positions. He is simply representing the positions White voters already have, or have wanted to have. He is thus a figure they can rally around and support as someone finally speaking for them, saying the things and taking the positions that no one else has dared to say or take. He’s bringing up issues no contender has brought up before, issues that most voters never expected to be brought up, thereby giving them a choice they never had before, that they had lost all hope for, with results that shocked and rocked the political world.
The establishment spins it all as anger, the emotional stage right before hate, which removes it from serious consideration, because they can’t admit the truth. A segment of the GOP party base that is too large to ignore, without which they can’t win and will cease to be competitive with the democrats, has woken up and will never be satisfied with the same old, same old politics as usual again. The traitors are lost in the woods. Their yellow brick road has disappeared. Their long-time status quo is falling apart and they’ll never be able to put it back together again. What good is a controlled opposition party that is unable to control the opposition, i.e., the White masses. Noel Ignatiev (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/?s=ignatiev&x=11&y=9) never taught the race traitors how to deal with this. Where’s Earl Raab (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/07/joe-klein-immigration-will-save-the-u-s-from-white-racism/) when they need him? Didn’t he say 23 years ago that they had already won, that the White peril was a thing of the past?
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Earl-Raab-1919-2015-speaking-at-the-1972-AFT-Los-Angeles-Civil-Rights-Conference-198x300.jpgEarl Raab

While Germany is teaching (http://www.amren.com/news/2016/03/government-funded-website-teaches-migrants-how-to-have-sex-in-13-different-languages/)Middle-Eastern males the right way to have sex with German women, Trump is attacking (http://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2016/03/22/exclusive-donald-trump-on-brussels-attack-the-terrorists-are-totally-winning/) the race traitors in Europe much more explicitly than he is here, becoming not just the anti-Obama, but the anti-Merkel as well. Barbara Lerner Spectre (http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/09/kevin-macdonald-jews-play-a-leading-role-in-promoting-multiculturalism-in-europe/) might find herself in a neo-“monolithic” Europe.
We’ve already seen a number of wannabe anti-White leaders fall under Trump’s chariot wheels. Without Trump it wouldn’t have happened. But they made themselves vulnerable (http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/22/analysis-immigration-turned-rubio-campaign-national-embarrassment/) to someone like Trump, who wasn’t supposed to happen, and so have no one to blame but themselves. I join with the father of the murdered son who so eloquently expresses (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/13/father-son-murdered-illegal-pro-amnesty-john-kasich-marco-rubio-tried-treason/)why pro-amnesty Kasich and Rubio should be tried for treason.
Now, if we could only see Spectre’s, Ayers’, Will’s and Wise’s total discomfiture and undoing, these would be glorious days indeed!
Share:

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/images/default/16/printfriendly.png (http://www.printfriendly.com/print/new?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoccidentalobserver.net %2F2016%2F03%2Fthe-trump-effect%2F)
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/images/default/16/digg.png (http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoccidentalobserver.net%2F2 016%2F03%2Fthe-trump-effect%2F&title=The%20Trump%20Effect&bodytext=What%20do%20the%20detestable%20George%20W ill%20and%20Rich%20Lowry%20have%20in%20common%20wi th%20the%20execrable%20Tim%20Wise%20and%20Bill%20A yers%3F%20Answer%3A%20fanatical%20opposition%20to% 20Donald%20Trump%2C%20to%20the%20point%20of%20rega rding%20Trump%20supporters%20as%20enemies.%20Why%2 0not%3F%20They%20all%20share%20something%20in%20co m)
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/images/default/16/facebook.png (http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoccidentalobserver .net%2F2016%2F03%2Fthe-trump-effect%2F&t=The%20Trump%20Effect)
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/plugins/sociable-30/images/default/16/twitter.png (http://twitter.com/home?status=The%20Trump%20Effect%20-%20http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoccidentalobserver.net%2F20 16%2F03%2Fthe-trump-effect%2F)

[mick silver]

White people: this is the moment of truth. Will we choose multiracial democracy or white nationalism? Know this: if you support Donald Trump or would even consider voting for him for president, you have chosen the latter. You are my enemy. I will not seek to co-exist with you. I will not make nice. I will not pretend we believe in the same things but merely have different opinions about how to get there. You are the enemy, plain and simple. And you must be stopped. You must lose and not just by a little. By a lot. A crushing defeat that leaves no doubt in your mind that the country you prefer is gone and is never coming back. … De-friend me now. You do not believe in decency or justice or democracy. And you are beyond reason.

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10153338275145969&id=140254320968

[Down1]

They are going after Corbyn very hard this week.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/07/28/labours-gas-chamber-blues-pink-berets-vs-fing-anti-semites/

https://diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com/2018/07/26/jews-furious-as-goy-cling-to-last-remnants-of-free-speech/

[Cebu_4_2]

They are going after Corbyn very hard this week.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2018/07/28/labours-gas-chamber-blues-pink-berets-vs-fing-anti-semites/

https://diversitymachtfrei.wordpress.com/2018/07/26/jews-furious-as-goy-cling-to-last-remnants-of-free-speech/



Jews furious as goy cling to last remnants of free speech
Jews furious as goy cling to last remnants of free speech

[Cebu_4_2]

It wont even past a copy past thing!

Jews furious as goy cling to last remnants of free speech

[SockPuppet]

Bloodbath over free speach.

[Cebu_4_2]

https://diversitymachtfrei.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/unitedwestand.png?w=900
Today Jews continue their campaign of orchestrated hysteria against Jeremy Corbyn, accusing a lifelong leftist of being an anti-Semite because he has accepted their absurd “Working Definition of Anti-Semitism” but rejected a few of the examples it contains. These examples classify criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism. Since suppressing criticism of Israel was the Jews’ entire purpose in pushing this definition in the first place, that naturally drives them to fury.
Thanks to the Jews’ vast over-representation in the media, talk of anti-Semitism now occupies a significant proportion of British political discussion. There is never any pushback against the Jewish position. The whole tenour of the discussion is “What is wrong with Labour? Why don’t they just agree to the Jewish demands?”
But what is the underlying problem here? Are Jews being firebombed in their homes? Sent to camps and exterminated? No. There’s hasn’t been a single physical anti-Semitic attack on a Jew that would merit charges of Grievous Bodily Harm in the last 2 years, and this is according to their own biased CST reports. If they are not threatened physically, perhaps Jews are being discriminated against in some other walks of life, then? Well, no. Jews have the highest average income of any ethnic group. They are 20% of the top 100 richest people in Britain, despite being 0.5% of the population. They have the highest representation in Parliament of any ethnic group in Britain. They have the highest representation in journalism of any ethnic group – by far.
By every metric, they are the most pampered, privileged and objectively well-off group in Britain. Yet instead of expressing gratitude to the British people for allowing them to have such safe and comfortable lives, Jews subject their hosts to an endless chorus of narcissistic whining. They demand that the goyim suppress their own freedom to make the Jews feel better. The Jews draw up an elaborate charter prescribing what the goyim should be allowed to say about them and anything they feel strongly about. This in itself is a curious illustration of the Jewish domination of our societies. In the old days, Jews would be given Charters of Privileges by the local ruler who wanted them to settle in his territory. In the modern world, Jews create and impose what are in effect Charters of Disabilities on the Gentiles, defining what they are not allowed to do or say, on pain of prosecution, employment termination and other forms of personal destruction.
As ever, Jews act as a vanguard for the armies of Diversity. Whatever special privileges Jews obtain this year, other minority groups will demand a few years later. Muslims, no doubt, are busily drawing up their “Working Definition of Islamophobia” which they will seek to impose on the rest of us before long. Gays, blacks, trannies, fat people, every conceivable identity or interest group, will soon demand the right to prescribe what everyone else is allowed to say about them. And what will the defence against those claims be? Once you have surrendered this privilege to the Jews, there is no principled ground left on which to defend free speech.
It would be a great thing if Jeremy Corbyn genuinely was what the Jews accuse him of being. Unfortunately, he is a caricature leftist who, if he achieved power, would throw open the borders and do everything he could to fulfil the Jewish agenda of Genocide by Diversity. Only his critique of Israel sets him apart from them.
You genuinely have to marvel at the kind of apocalyptic hysteria Jews are capable of putting out. All of this because some goy only agree to a 95% suppression of their own free speech, not the full 100%? Do they really feel this way? Are their expressions of emotion sincere? If so, you would have to conclude that they are so detached from reality as to be almost deranged. If not, you would have to conclude that they are cynically deceitful to an almost inhuman degree. Either way it leads to the same conclusion: these people cannot be taken seriously as interlocutors. They simply have to be disempowered and defeated.

[Neuro]

They always overplay their hand due to being prone to extremism, and that will be their downfall. I think one problem they have with Jeremy Corbyn is that he is not in their pocket, they can’t bribe him, and he is generally clean too so they can’t extort him, and thus he is unreliable, in their minds, even though he subscribes to most of their current agendas. But they can’t get him to play along in their wars. If he gets into power he most likely will be assassinated. Olof Palme (prime minister) and Anna Lind (foreign minister) of Sweden where similar outspoken socialist critics of Israel, murdered in 1986 and 2002 respectively.