View Full Version : What was found in Antarctica and concealed from us
midnight rambler
18th April 2016, 07:06 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x40A0sBL34
Glass
18th April 2016, 07:15 PM
need to see the full length version of that for sure.
Shhhhh, its a treasure trove.
I wonder where you would end up if you just kept flying on in the same direction?
midnight rambler
18th April 2016, 07:17 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0puAuM-vdK4
Cebu_4_2
18th April 2016, 07:19 PM
need to see the full length version of that for sure.
Shhhhh, its a treasure trove.
I wonder where you would end up if you just kept flying on in the same direction?
Over the edge and fall off.
midnight rambler
18th April 2016, 07:32 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0puAuM-vdK4
Perhaps this would explain why the effort to destroy Germany as a nation since at least WW2 to the present.
Glass
18th April 2016, 07:34 PM
Over the edge and fall off.
There might be just more and more of those pockets out to infinity. I've often wonder why this thing is called a Plane-T. does it mean the bit of the earth relative to me simply looks like a plane? Or is it always a plane and they just added a letter? or are we on plane number 20 designated by the letter T.
Todays plane is bought to you by the letter T.
you know I'm sure this discussion could go better with something.
'
But seriously the video said the water was 38f. I wonder what the ambient air temp was.
Was it antarctica or greenland? I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.
So the Byrd expedition was a military one and they lost more than half their carrier aircraft, a destroyer, dozens of soldiers and officers and they bailed out 2 months into a 6 month mission.
palani
18th April 2016, 07:51 PM
Was it antarctica or greenland? I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.
Here is what they spend in greenland.
http://www.coinfactswiki.com/w/images/thumb/3/3c/Greenland_1953_5_kroner_obv_Ponterio_150-8139.jpg/600px-Greenland_1953_5_kroner_obv_Ponterio_150-8139.jpg
Here is what they spend in antarctica.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTl2q-Jgd84TEwC5yiwlF24ugiUo5mhSOwtozRTN-RRR26l-JDc
7th trump
18th April 2016, 07:56 PM
Perhaps this would explain why the effort to destroy Germany as a nation since at least WW2 to the present.
Dont know because none of us Americans can understand communist russian language. Interesting you post a link thats in russian.
Joshua01
18th April 2016, 08:05 PM
Oh brother....what's next? Reptilian Nazis? I swear you guys will believe anything
midnight rambler
18th April 2016, 08:05 PM
Dont know because none of us Americans can understand communist russian language. Interesting you post a link thats in russian.
I gather you're illiterate and unable to read subtitles in plain English.
midnight rambler
18th April 2016, 08:07 PM
Oh brother....what's next? Reptilian Nazis? I swear you guys will believe anything
I take it you've never heard of Nazi Hell creatures from inside the hollow earth.
"With God all things are possible." --Jesus Christ
Allow for the possibility.
Joshua01
18th April 2016, 08:12 PM
I take it you've never heard of Nazi Hell creatures from inside the hollow earth.
"With God all things are possible." --Jesus Christ
I can't believe you typed both those things in the same post to make a point!
midnight rambler
18th April 2016, 08:17 PM
I can't believe you typed both those things in the same post to make a point!
The first is in jest...partially.
Seriously though, Nazi Hell creatures from inside the hollow earth is a thing*. I didn't come up with that on my own.
*I would suggest you read The Book of the Subgenius for more info on the subject
http://jmason.org/slack/S-or-D.gif
Joshua01
18th April 2016, 08:18 PM
The first is in jest...partially.
That makes me feel better then :)
Glass
18th April 2016, 09:14 PM
Here is what they spend in greenland.
http://www.coinfactswiki.com/w/images/thumb/3/3c/Greenland_1953_5_kroner_obv_Ponterio_150-8139.jpg/600px-Greenland_1953_5_kroner_obv_Ponterio_150-8139.jpg
Here is what they spend in antarctica.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTl2q-Jgd84TEwC5yiwlF24ugiUo5mhSOwtozRTN-RRR26l-JDc
I didn't see either of those in the video. Only some rocks and what look like lakes and some ice. No compass bearings or anything like that. And as I was not on the aircraft (plane) I can't be sure of where they are.
Those images sort of match descriptions Byrd apparently wrote of what he saw from the air but they may have been selected from other sources and used to dramatic affect.
Glass
18th April 2016, 09:17 PM
I gather you're illiterate and unable to read subtitles in plain English.
I thought that was an american thing. No sure what executive order it was but no subtitles to be shown in the US. I can't think of any other reason why someone would not recognize them. It's a shame because foreign films can be very good, enloightening, exciting, hillarious. romantic - proper romance not twerking n so on.
seems some people model their lives on such deep thought classics as Blast From the Past or similar.
cheka.
18th April 2016, 09:49 PM
what's the big deal? geothermal heat near the surface keeps it warmer in that little area?
Glass
18th April 2016, 10:06 PM
I think the deal is that it's there and not common knowledge. No mention of the research stations researching it. Only hear tales of how it gets 50 below and you can only go in there at certain times of the year because it's iced in etc.
I don't think that the first video is related in anyway to the second video. I think the only similarity is the name of the Operation. Other than that there is no cross over. Oh secret nazi bases are in antarctica apparently. Thats the only similarity - the use of the word antarctica.
cheka.
18th April 2016, 10:20 PM
I think the deal is that it's there and not common knowledge. No mention of the research stations researching it. Only hear tales of how it gets 50 below and you can only go in there at certain times of the year because it's iced in etc.
I don't think that the first video is related in anyway to the second video. I think the only similarity is the name of the Operation. Other than that there is no cross over. Oh secret nazi bases are in antarctica apparently. Thats the only similarity - the use of the word antarctica.
playing along -- so the warm spot is being hidden...why would they do that?
the m-asses care nothing about VERY important issues...much less this yawner that is easily explained and difficult to dispute
Glass
19th April 2016, 01:04 AM
Had you heard of it before? Seen pictures of it? Heard it mentioned when talking of Antarctica?
I hadn't. Ask a school kid what is antarcitca and see if they mention lakes of unfrozen water and areas that are not covered in snow or ice.
And I'm sorry, I don't have answers, only questions.
No idea why other than the description in the video and in Byrds on accounts that the area is rich in mineral resources. The narrator said the shores were covered in coal. I don't know what that means specifically? lumps of it just laying around or did they dig a few holes. If there is coal then there were trees there in the past. If there is coal in seams then there will be gas.
Byrd said there were many other resources. Uranium. Some one credits him with saying precious things, I can't recall if gemstones or metals.
But we've spent 50 years there doing what? Looks a lot like the man going to the moon thing. No thing actually comes of it. Despite all those years. They just do research. Take ice cores and measure wind speed? Is that all there is to do there?
These days (last 100 years) science doesn't get done unless it can be commercialized.
vacuum
19th April 2016, 01:33 AM
It appears, looking at all the treaties, that anyone is free to enter the continent for peacful purposes and go to any area they want, except for scientific areas which in which case you have to notify the country in that location beforehand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System
Articles of the Antarctic Treaty
Article 1 – The area is to be used for peaceful purposes only; military activity, such as weapons testing, is prohibited but military personnel and equipment may be used for scientific research or any other peaceful purpose;
Article 2 – Freedom of scientific investigations and cooperation shall continue;
Article 3 – Free exchange of information and personnel in cooperation with the United Nations and other international agencies;
Article 4 – The treaty does not recognize, dispute, nor establish territorial sovereignty claims; no new claims shall be asserted while the treaty is in force;
Article 5 – The treaty prohibits nuclear explosions or disposal of radioactive wastes;
Article 6 – Includes under the treaty all land and ice shelves but not the surrounding waters south of 60 degrees 00 minutes south (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/60th_parallel_south);
Article 7 – Treaty-state observers have free access, including aerial observation, to any area and may inspect all stations, installations, and equipment; advance notice of all activities and of the introduction of military personnel must be given;
Article 8 – Allows for good jurisdiction over observers and scientists by their own states;
Article 9 – Frequent consultative meetings take place among member nations;
Article 10 – All treaty states will discourage activities by any country in Antarctica that are contrary to the treaty;
Article 11 – All disputes to be settled peacefully by the parties concerned or, ultimately, by the International Court of Justice (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Court_of_Justice);
Articles 12, 13, 14 – Deal with upholding, interpreting, and amending the treaty among involved nations.
Furthermore, the United States has additional laws and restrictions for it's citizens:
United States The law of the United States (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_the_United_States), including certain criminal offenses by or against U.S. nationals, such as murder, may apply to areas not under jurisdiction of other countries. To this end, the United States now stations special deputy U.S. Marshals (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Marshal) in Antarctica to provide a law enforcement presence.[21] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System#cite_note-21)
Some U.S. laws directly apply to Antarctica. For example, the Antarctic Conservation Act (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Conservation_Act), Public Law 95-541, 16 U.S.C. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_16_of_the_United_States_Code) § 2401 (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/16/2401) et seq., provides civil and criminal penalties for the following activities, unless authorized by regulation or statute (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute):
the taking of native Antarctic mammals or birds
the introduction into Antarctica of non-indigenous plants and animals
entry into specially protected or scientific areas
the discharge or disposal of pollutants into Antarctica or Antarctic waters
the importation into the U.S. of certain items from Antarctica
Violation of the Antarctic Conservation Act carries penalties of up to US$10,000 in fines and one year in prison.
palani
19th April 2016, 05:18 AM
I didn't see either of those in the video.
Just making the point that these fictional entities we create in the mind are made for one purpose and one purpose only:
TO CONVERT TO CURRENCY
palani
19th April 2016, 05:31 AM
criminal offenses by or against U.S. nationals
Wikipedia has a large amount of artistic license. There is a concept of a status called 'U.S. national' but the State Department doesn't appear to make the definition clear. From statute law as far as I can tell a U.S. national is one born on Guam, American Samoa, Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands.
I presume once you accept the slave status of U.S. citizen you can no longer claim the relatively less taxed status of U.S. national even if you could pin down government on what that status is.
monty
19th April 2016, 09:39 AM
I presume once you accept the slave status of U.S. citizen you can no longer claim the relatively less taxed status of U.S. national even if you could pin down government on what that status is.
Accepting the slave status of U. S. Citzen under fraud is immaterial in "their" eyes. There is no going back.
palani
19th April 2016, 10:56 AM
There is no going back.
Not quite so. I never try to deal in absolutes.
I was a U.S. citizen slave at one time but then suffered a bout with billious fever and as a result of the whiteness that resulted from this dread disease was emancipated. People who have not been exposed to billious fever now consider me to be a carrier.
7th trump
19th April 2016, 11:36 AM
You can go back to being a "state" citizen anytime you desire. The courts have said " no white man owes his allegiance to the recent amendment" (14th amendment). I do not know what Palani is talking about and I suspect neither does he.
7th trump
19th April 2016, 11:39 AM
Don't kid yourself people. If Palani said hes not a US citizen any longer......he's lying his ass off. The reason I know is because he hasn't yet discussed any revellent law or court cite relating to the topic.
He's a clown!!!!!
7th trump
19th April 2016, 11:44 AM
US national..........Palani doesn't even know who that is or what that is.
The courts have ruled that "WE THE PEOPLE" are state citizens.......not US nationals or us citizens.
Like I say.......Palani is a clown playing with your intelligence.
cheka.
19th April 2016, 11:57 AM
geothermal
https://cryopolitics.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/20141029_132755.jpg
http://imgc.allpostersimages.com/images/P-473-488-90/95/9526/HT54500Z/posters/arctic-images-boiling-mud-pots-in-geothermal-area-iceland.jpg
http://static2.imaggeo.egu.eu/media/uploads/2010/01/10/cdba1fc43d7149809d53bbfda69210e2.jpg
http://c8.alamy.com/comp/D9R03R/hardy-bathers-take-a-dip-in-the-sea-then-warm-up-in-a-trough-of-geothermal-D9R03R.jpg
palani
19th April 2016, 12:12 PM
You can go back to being a "state" citizen anytime you desire. The courts have said " no white man owes his allegiance to the recent amendment" (14th amendment). I do not know what Palani is talking about and I suspect neither does he.
Don't kid yourself people. If Palani said hes not a US citizen any longer......he's lying his ass off. The reason I know is because he hasn't yet discussed any revellent law or court cite relating to the topic.
He's a clown!!!!!
US national..........Palani doesn't even know who that is or what that is.
The courts have ruled that "WE THE PEOPLE" are state citizens.......not US nationals or us citizens.
Like I say.......Palani is a clown playing with your intelligence.
Tell me I don't know how to pull this guys chains. If he was a fish he would be HOOKED right up to the reel.
Fish fry tonite guys. Featuring filet of 7Tth_trump gumbo (Creole style).
Ponce
19th April 2016, 02:53 PM
What was (and will be) found in the poles?.......you have seen nothing yet, if they let you.
V
7th trump
19th April 2016, 04:36 PM
Just making the point that these fictional entities we create in the mind are made for one purpose and one purpose only:
TO CONVERT TO CURRENCY
You and your lawful money bullshit that you havent yet proven...just recite a code section so many times they will eventually believe you....sounds communist to me.
7th trump
19th April 2016, 04:38 PM
Tell me I don't know how to pull this guys chains. If he was a fish he would be HOOKED right up to the reel.
Fish fry tonite guys. Featuring filet of 7Tth_trump gumbo (Creole style).
No you dont moron. Its more like this ...I like to prove you wrong by providing intelligent reasoning and law. All you do is hook onto every damn conspiracy theory out there but cant prove any of them.
palani
19th April 2016, 04:52 PM
sounds communist to me.
Have you been hearing sounds lately?
palani
19th April 2016, 05:04 PM
I like to DREAM OF PROVING YOU wrong by providing intelligent reasoning and law
I corrected your statement for you.
You can thank me later.
ximmy
19th April 2016, 05:09 PM
No matter what profession 7th trump pretends to be proficient in, be it electrical engineering, law, theology, politics, diplomacy; he fails miserably.
Sucks to be him.
Glass
19th April 2016, 05:23 PM
You and your lawful money bullshit that you havent yet proven...just recite a code section so many times they will eventually believe you....sounds communist to me.
Really? You haven't heard of this thing called the constitution for the United States of America? Please tell me you've heard of it.
7th trump
19th April 2016, 06:56 PM
Really? You haven't heard of this thing called the constitution for the United States of America? Please tell me you've heard of it.
Ok...I'll bite. What does the Constitution have to do with lawful money?
7th trump
19th April 2016, 07:07 PM
No matter what profession 7th trump pretends to be proficient in, be it electrical engineering, law, theology, politics, diplomacy; he fails miserably.
Sucks to be him.
Ohhh look ximmy has a communist fool supporting her blathering.
As for you ximmy palani has failed in electronics. Hes tried, but failed to tell the RMS value of DC. The idiot didnt realize there is no RMS value of DC. RMS value is to accurately determine the dc POWER VALUE OF ac since AC fluctuates back and forth with "0" being the center.
I have proven Palani a fool in law also..Lawful money as far as the courts have deemed is also paper currency...but hes not going to tell you this, but the fool knows it. He also passes foreign law as US law....you cant do that!
I do not know what Palani's politics are and dont really care.
Diplomacy....you think citing latin phrases makes you intelligent in law or anything? Why not just translate it and apply it in your own language to be smart instead of looking smart.
As far as you go Ximmy. All you do is try stirring the pot but your not intelligent enough to make one for yourself. Besides you're not that good looking anyway. I prefer brunettes with blue eyes...you are not that!
midnight rambler
19th April 2016, 07:16 PM
Ohhh look ximmy has a communist fool supporting her blathering.
As for you ximmy palani has failed in electronics. Hes tried, but failed to tell the RMS value of DC. The idiot didnt realize there is no RMS value of DC. RMS value is to accurately determine the dc POWER VALUE OF ac since AC fluctuates back and forth with "0" being the center.
I have proven Palani a fool in law also..Lawful money as far as the courts have deemed is also paper currency...but hes not going to tell you this, but the fool knows it. He also passes foreign law as US law....you cant do that!
I do not know what Palani's politics are and dont really care.
Diplomacy....you think citing latin phrases makes you intelligent in law or anything? Why not just translate it and apply it in your own language to be smart instead of looking smart.
As far as you go Ximmy. All you do is try stirring the pot but your not intelligent enough to make one for yourself. Besides you're not that good looking anyway. I prefer brunettes with blue eyes...you are not that!
You've referred to this community as "...a cess pool (sic) of douche bags..." yet you continue to post your drivel here. One can only reasonably conclude by your own openly expressed perceptions that 1) you enjoy taking frequent dips in places you consider cesspools and 2) you enjoy the company of folks who in your own openly expressed opinion are douche bags. What does that say about you??
palani
19th April 2016, 07:20 PM
failed to tell the RMS value of DC
RMS is the DC equivalent of ANY waveform.
Doesn't DC have a DC equivalent? And wouldn't that DC equivalent be the same as the DC voltage level? So the RMS value of a 2 vdc source is 2 volts.
Q.E.D.
Quote of the day: Fools can be led to knowledge but that won't make them more intelligent.
7th trump
19th April 2016, 07:22 PM
RMS is the DC equivalent of ANY waveform.
Doesn't DC have a DC equivalent? And wouldn't that DC equivalent be the same as the DC voltage level? So the RMS value of a 2 vdc source is 2 volts.
Q.E.D.
Quote of the day: Fools can be led to knowledge but that won't make them more intelligent.
You're as sneaky and deceitful as ted Cruz.
Glass
19th April 2016, 09:54 PM
Ok...I'll bite. What does the Constitution have to do with lawful money?
The constitution stipulates what money is. Money is the thing that pays a debt. Either a Public or Private one. It states clearly that it must be Gold or Silver. No other thing is stipulated as acceptable to pay a debt.
The debts are not payable by any other thing. The current method, in lieu of money is something that discharges or sets the debt off for a future time. A Note, being a negotiable instrument by definition does not have the capacity to pay a debt. It merely enables the debt to be set off (deferred) until a later time. That later time is the time when lawful money once again comes into existence.
The tiime that lawful money makes its reappearance is soley up to the People. In the US of A, the people are described in the Constitution. The Constitution is waiting for the people to reappear. Lawful money is waiting for the people to reappear.
In the mean time, all debts Public and Private are accumulated by the Government calling itself the "United States". Even the debts you accumulate are transfered to this thing called United States because it is being set off with FED notes. That is what the FED notes are for, to transfer the debt you incurred to the entity in DC.
DC is then forced to extract energy from the citizens (no people around) by deducting some arbitary % from the citizens pool of Notes, thereby reducing their ability to set off their debts to the DC entity. This has the effect of drawing off energy (current) from those citizens. Hence the term currency. And when something draws current away and provides no motion or motive force/energy as a result it is considered parasitic. I'm fairly sure that is a priniciple in electronics/electric engineering. Parasitic drain.
This drain reduces the speed at which the DC organisations debt rises. Just as, reducing (parasitic) interest rates reduces the speed at which the debt must be paid to those who claim there is a debt.
palani
20th April 2016, 04:12 AM
You're as sneaky and deceitful as ted Cruz.
Does that mean you are planning on writing me in?
Glass
20th April 2016, 05:07 AM
I was going to add this as an edit but I thought it might get lost.
Edit: I might have that last paragraph back the front. Maybe someone can help me out there. Does reducing interest slow the payment of the debt or increase it. It reduces the parastic drain - the interest charges. Paying more of the interest with the fixed pool of notes would mean less notes to pay the principle. Paying less interest would mean more of the pool of notes could go to the principle.
I guess that assumes that the Debtor would use the notes not going to interest to pay principle and there is nothing to say they have to or do.
The other element is, can the notes pay the debt held by the Government (in DC). I think the doing of things (giving energy) for rich people (FED debt holders) satisfies their needs. Even though it might not reduce the oustanding Debt ledger.
Anyone?
7th trump
20th April 2016, 05:15 AM
The constitution stipulates what money is. Money is the thing that pays a debt. Either a Public or Private one. It states clearly that it must be Gold or Silver. No other thing is stipulated as acceptable to pay a debt.
The debts are not payable by any other thing. The current method, in lieu of money is something that discharges or sets the debt off for a future time. A Note, being a negotiable instrument by definition does not have the capacity to pay a debt. It merely enables the debt to be set off (deferred) until a later time. That later time is the time when lawful money once again comes into existence.
The tiime that lawful money makes its reappearance is soley up to the People. In the US of A, the people are described in the Constitution. The Constitution is waiting for the people to reappear. Lawful money is waiting for the people to reappear.
In the mean time, all debts Public and Private are accumulated by the Government calling itself the "United States". Even the debts you accumulate are transfered to this thing called United States because it is being set off with FED notes. That is what the FED notes are for, to transfer the debt you incurred to the entity in DC.
DC is then forced to extract energy from the citizens (no people around) by deducting some arbitary % from the citizens pool of Notes, thereby reducing their ability to set off their debts to the DC entity. This has the effect of drawing off energy (current) from those citizens. Hence the term currency. And when something draws current away and provides no motion or motive force/energy as a result it is considered parasitic. I'm fairly sure that is a priniciple in electronics/electric engineering. Parasitic drain.
This drain reduces the speed at which the DC organisations debt rises. Just as, reducing (parasitic) interest rates reduces the speed at which the debt must be paid to those who claim there is a debt.
I knew you were going to be wrong coming out the gate and looky there....in your the first paragraph. The Constitution says nothing at all that money must be gold or silver. Go back and reread that Constitution. This time maybe read it without any prejudice...read it for what it is and says.
Matter of fact moron, the Constitution doesnt even say all debts must be paid using US coin. Money back then was many different currencies and was used to pay debt. Think about it moron...back then America consisted of territories owned and claimed by other countries.
You arent too freaken intelligent are you.....but then again you have two of the dumbest people I know giving you "thank you's" for your not so intelligent opinion.
I didnt read past your first paragraph once I read your mistake. After that I knew it too was probably just stories you've read somewhere and regurgitated.
Amazes me that most people cant think for or by themselves and take other opinions as truth.......your response is a perfect example.
Maybe get with the Lord and ask for intelligence and insight.
palani
20th April 2016, 05:34 AM
ask for intelligence and insight.
Why? You have not shown much success in this field.
palani
20th April 2016, 05:42 AM
it might not reduce the oustanding Debt ledger.
Anyone?
The debt load of the federal government is limited by congress to $346,681,016. It hasn't changed since 1878. This for some odd reason is precisely 10 years after the federal government abdicated to the national government by the mechanism of the 14th amendment. This amendment provides that insurgent debt (future debt ... not past debt) shall not be paid. Insurgent debt is now considered to be in the trillions. Insurgent debt is national debt. Insurgent debt is not federal debt.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Quite unique really. The drafters wanted to emancipate the new government but didn't want to be responsible for the debts of their creation so they cut the national government lose. It is responsible for its own actions. By the same token the national government is not going to be saddled with all kinds of constitutional restrictions that by right only applies to the now defunct (in 1868) federal government.
The 14th amendment is called by some the red amendment. Perhaps you have to take the red pill to see things clearly. 7th_trump is a blue pill kinda guy.
7th trump
20th April 2016, 06:40 AM
The debt load of the federal government is limited by congress to $346,681,016. It hasn't changed since 1878. This for some odd reason is precisely 10 years after the federal government abdicated to the national government by the mechanism of the 14th amendment. This amendment provides that insurgent debt (future debt ... not past debt) shall not be paid. Insurgent debt is now considered to be in the trillions. Insurgent debt is national debt. Insurgent debt is not federal debt.
Quite unique really. The drafters wanted to emancipate the new government but didn't want to be responsible for the debts of their creation so they cut the national government lose. It is responsible for its own actions. By the same token the national government is not going to be saddled with all kinds of constitutional restrictions that by right only applies to the now defunct (in 1868) federal government.
The 14th amendment is called by some the red amendment. Perhaps you have to take the red pill to see things clearly. 7th_trump is a blue pill kinda guy.
Wow you can really fubar things completely out of context cant you palani.
BTW, you forgot to add your disclaimer on each of your post.
It should read something like this:
My post are just an opinion to entertain far fetched idea's that pop into my head because I'm actually too lazy to do any real investigation to determine facts.
My opinions are not based on any real facts but just more idea's that pop into my head.
My opinions in law are for entertainment purposes ONLY as I occasionally insert foreign law where I cant mentally grasp US law.
palani
20th April 2016, 06:50 AM
you forgot to add your disclaimer on each of your post
Correct. Here it is
DC IS A WAVEFORM
BITE ME
Glass
20th April 2016, 06:52 AM
anyway I guess things are interpreted according to frame of view or reference. The right to bear arms is regularly mis interpreted toward an end but it's the sleight of tongue as often used by an attorney.
Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
When I look at a tree and know that I have been told it is green, I can assume that the colour green is the same for everyone or I could consider that the colour I see as green may not be the same colour that others see as green, even though we agree that trees are green.
The same could apply to the colour of pils or the colour of a political affiliation. What is blue and what is red. I think we can agree that communism is red just as we can agree that trees are green. Question is does this affect the true colour of the pill?
midnight rambler
20th April 2016, 06:55 AM
The Constitution says nothing at all that money must be gold or silver...the Constitution doesnt (sic) even say all debts must be paid using US coin.
You've established that you FAIL at reading comprehension so there's little surprise in this asinine statement of yours.
palani
20th April 2016, 07:11 AM
does this affect the true colour of the pill
The U.S. started out with the Federalist Papers. These papers presented a positive view of a national form of government yet proponents took the name FEDERALISTS. This left the opponents to the nationalist view (aka 'the true Federalists') without a proper name so since they were in opposition to the FEDERALISTS they took the name Anti-Federalists. They were for states (countries) that could determine their own future. The Anti-Federalists were actually for a federal arrangement but here is the key point. Anytime you are AGAINST something then this is your platform. The very action of opposing gives power to that which you are opposing. You knock hell out of the opponent by agreeing with him at all times and then work to undermine him (show him the consequences of his irrational approach). I equate this with planting a seed. You might never see it germinate but that is all you can do without giving your power to an opponent.
Power is transferred by the direction of the eyes.
7th trump
20th April 2016, 08:48 AM
anyway I guess things are interpreted according to frame of view or reference. The right to bear arms is regularly mis interpreted toward an end but it's the sleight of tongue as often used by an attorney.
When I look at a tree and know that I have been told it is green, I can assume that the colour green is the same for everyone or I could consider that the colour I see as green may not be the same colour that others see as green, even though we agree that trees are green.
The same could apply to the colour of pils or the colour of a political affiliation. What is blue and what is red. I think we can agree that communism is red just as we can agree that trees are green. Question is does this affect the true colour of the pill?
Read that again!
But this time take in consideration the title.......
Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States
This not referencing what the federal government can or cannot do at all.
Nothing in there does it say the federal government must coin gold and silver. All has to do with the states accepting gold and silver as payment of debt. Nothing in the Constitution that says the government cant out source the responsibilities of the Treasury either.
You can see the what ever shade of green the tree is but don't ever question or argue with what actual green the tree is. That's what Palani does and it reflects your intelligence.....don't be like palani!
Be honest and truthful even if it hurts accepting the truth. Furthermore don't inject lies into anything to interpret the law....Palani does this all the time and if you notice I call the dumb ass out for doing this time and time again. He loses every time with me.
PS......after reading this post don't you believe without a doubt Midnight ramble ass is one dumb douche bag.
I mean come on he steps in like hes any authority by yapping his smart ass mouth off and I shovel his own shit down his throat.
If I were you I'd try and block any fool like him from thanking your posts....its embarrassing is it not?
7th trump
20th April 2016, 08:58 AM
The U.S. started out with the Federalist Papers. These papers presented a positive view of a national form of government yet proponents took the name FEDERALISTS. This left the opponents to the nationalist view (aka 'the true Federalists') without a proper name so since they were in opposition to the FEDERALISTS they took the name Anti-Federalists. They were for states (countries) that could determine their own future. The Anti-Federalists were actually for a federal arrangement but here is the key point. Anytime you are AGAINST something then this is your platform. The very action of opposing gives power to that which you are opposing. You knock hell out of the opponent by agreeing with him at all times and then work to undermine him (show him the consequences of his irrational approach). I equate this with planting a seed. You might never see it germinate but that is all you can do without giving your power to an opponent.
Power is transferred by the direction of the eyes.
disclaimer
My post are just an opinion to entertain far fetched idea's that pop into my head because I'm actually too lazy to do any real investigation to determine facts.
My opinions are not based on any real facts but just more idea's that pop into my head.
My opinions in law are for entertainment purposes ONLY as I occasionally insert foreign law where I cant mentally grasp US law.
Fixed it for you Palani....your welcome
Glass
20th April 2016, 11:11 AM
Er, a common mis interpretation presented by a sleight of tongue. As I said in my post
Nothing in there does it say the federal government must coin gold and silver.
We are not talking about what the federal government must do. We are talking about what is to be used to pay a debt. Gold and Silver are the only things allowed to pay a debt.
If the states are not permitted to coin such a thing and the federal government doesn't want to or chooses not to coin gold or silver, the outcome becomes that a debt cannot be paid for want of the thing.
You are falling for the same decietful type of interpretation that is used to say the 2nd ammendment is not a right for Americans to bear arms because it says militia in the same sentence. It's no wonder. You appear to be heavily influenced by the evangelicals. An extremely decietful movement.
7th trump
20th April 2016, 11:30 AM
Er, a common mis interpretation presented by a sleight of tongue. As I said in my post
We are not talking about what the federal government must do. We are talking about what is to be used to pay a debt. Gold and Silver are the only things allowed to pay a debt.
If the states are not permitted to coin such a thing and the federal government doesn't want to or chooses not to coin gold or silver, the outcome becomes that a debt cannot be paid for want of the thing.
You are falling for the same decietful type of interpretation that is used to say the 2nd ammendment is not a right for Americans to bear arms because it says militia in the same sentence. It's no wonder. You appear to be heavily influenced by the evangelicals. An extremely decietful movement.
Bullshit!!
I asked you where in the Constitution it said that money can only be gold and silver coins. You came back with a provision relating to the "states" and the states only. I even went to the length of stating that nowhere in the Constitution does it say the government couldn't outsource the responsibilities of the Treasury by hiring the fed to print reserve notes.
A simple question you are now trying to skirt.
This is what I meant by not being honest.....................with yourself or anyone.....you're busted with your hands in the cookie jar.
So I bust your balls and now you're trying to link me with evangelicals who in your opinion are deceitful?
News flash for you Glass....I don't know what an evangelical is or what they represent and your opinion about them I could give a shit less.
I believe I know who the deceitful one is between the two of us.
You're such a fool that you even fool yourself into believing your own lies.
One more time asshole.......where in the Constitution does it state that the federal government can only coin silver and gold?
Show me one debt paid in cash that's still on the books and the creditors are still trying to collect?
Keep on believing that nut case palani and you'll be just as lost and confused as that dipshit is.
Palani is a lot like the devil....he knows hes a dead man walking but wants to take as many as he can to his death in the lake of fire.
Palani wants you to believe in his lies....makes him feel better.
mick silver
20th April 2016, 12:15 PM
oh hell what was this thread about again done forgot
Neuro
21st April 2016, 06:58 AM
oh hell what was this thread about again done forgot
I think it became a platform for pottymouth trump to stand and hurl insults at the membership! Again, I may add.
Joshua01
21st April 2016, 08:27 AM
Not much of a thread anymore
7th trump
21st April 2016, 08:34 AM
I think it became a platform for pottymouth trump to stand and hurl insults at the membership! Again, I may add.
The membership likes to fool itself so why not call them what they are.
I call you what you are and you have no problem hurling insults yourself.
Truth is a bitch isn't it....you should know.
collector
21st April 2016, 08:50 AM
I think it became a platform for pottymouth trump to stand and hurl insults at the membership! Again, I may add.
Must be 5:00 where he lives...or maybe 10 am and the bar is already open
Neuro
21st April 2016, 09:37 AM
The membership likes to fool itself so why not call them what they are.
I call you what you are and you have no problem hurling insults yourself.
Truth is a bitch isn't it....you should know.
No problem with truth! Attack me I'll attack back! You on the other hand has this propensity to start the insults. Anyhow continue as you do you'll soon have a very special place in limbo, where you'll have ample time to regret your spewing of profanities.
7th trump
21st April 2016, 09:45 AM
No problem with truth! Attack me I'll attack back! You on the other hand has this propensity to start the insults. Anyhow continue as you do you'll soon have a very special place in limbo, where you'll have ample time to regret your spewing of profanities.
You stupid fucking asshole liar.
I never attacked you....it was you who popped in attacking me over that twit Ximmy popping into a thread where Palani and myself were going at it over me calling his conspiracy ass out on a bullshit theory. I called her bullshit out as well and then you came in thinking you were coming to the rescue.
Wow you're a whiney cry baby little bitch aren't you.
Does this forum notice theres only a few that I call out and leave the rest alone? Theres a reason for it.
Glass
21st April 2016, 09:48 AM
yes I think its a thread diversion tactic. Anyway, cognitive dissonance runs thick with some. I often suspect that more than one person is running that account.
I would really like to know if that region does exist in the antarctic and if researchers have reached it and are investigating it.
Neuro
21st April 2016, 09:55 AM
You stupid fucking asshole liar.
I never attacked you....it was you who popped in attacking me over that twit Ximmy popping into a thread where Palani and myself were going at it over me calling his conspiracy ass out on a bullshit theory. I called her bullshit out as well and then you came in thinking you were coming to the rescue.
Wow you're a whiney cry baby little bitch aren't you.
Does this forum notice theres only a few that I call out and leave the rest alone? Theres a reason for it.
You don't call out anyone, you don't have the skill to rationally debate anything, probably the main reason for your pottymouth. You are a waste of bandwidth.
7th trump
21st April 2016, 11:18 AM
You don't call out anyone, you don't have the skill to rationally debate anything, probably the main reason for your pottymouth. You are a waste of bandwidth.
What ever you slimy liar....meassage for at the thunder dome.
Joshua01
21st April 2016, 11:30 AM
/thread
Pleeeeeeze!!!!
JohnQPublic
21st April 2016, 12:09 PM
7th- can you try and keep on topic, please? Otherwise start a new thread (the Thunderdome does appear appropriate).
7th trump
21st April 2016, 12:38 PM
7th- can you try and keep on topic, please? Otherwise start a new thread (the Thunderdome does appear appropriate).
Already have a thread started at the TD.
Neuro
22nd April 2016, 12:45 AM
7th- can you try and keep on topic, please? Otherwise start a new thread (the Thunderdome does appear appropriate).
How about you reducing his posting privileges for constantly breaking the forum rules instead? Or is there no consequences for that?
7th trump
22nd April 2016, 05:00 AM
How about you reducing his posting privileges for constantly breaking the forum rules instead? Or is there no consequences for that?
Ohhhhh....look at the cry baby.
He gets caught playing his game of popping in and attacking a poster and then wants that poster gone.
Neuro
22nd April 2016, 05:11 AM
Ohhhhh....look at the cry baby.
He gets caught playing his game of popping in and attacking a poster and then wants that poster gone.
No I just want you gone. You are a shit poster that contribute nothing to this site. You are the one playing games. It is pretty obvious to anyone who has the slightest interest in this site, that it works better when you scurry off with the tail between the legs, until you have collected enough courage (burp!) to come back and continue your insult fest! A better option would be to have you perm and ip-banned. I am not sure JQP have that interest in this site though...
7th trump
22nd April 2016, 06:56 AM
No I just want you gone. You are a shit poster that contribute nothing to this site. You are the one playing games. It is pretty obvious to anyone who has the slightest interest in this site, that it works better when you scurry off with the tail between the legs, until you have collected enough courage (burp!) to come back and continue your insult fest! A better option would be to have you perm and ip-banned. I am not sure JQP have that interest in this site though...
Ohhh really?
Then lets perma ban your ass as well.
By your own standard...you are guilty of.
You jumped into a conversation you had nothing at all to do with ...as if you thought you were above everyone to jump in and spout your mouth off and claim judge and executioner of me calling out Palani for his bullshit...all while breaking forum rules. You are nobody Neuro...absolutely a NOBODY to do what you did and continue to do.
All hail to dictator Neuro!!!!
Hahahahahaha..........got your moderator privileges revoked....bet your ass you wish you had them now...hahahahahaha....
7th trump
22nd April 2016, 07:00 AM
No I just want you gone. You are a shit poster that contribute nothing to this site. You are the one playing games. It is pretty obvious to anyone who has the slightest interest in this site, that it works better when you scurry off with the tail between the legs, until you have collected enough courage (burp!) to come back and continue your insult fest! A better option would be to have you perm and ip-banned. I am not sure JQP have that interest in this site though...
I only keep two idiots in check and that's Palani and Midnight...all this hype about me being a bad person is a result of you, Ximmy and Midnight jumping in throwing rocks when ever I check Palani or midnight.
My little outbursts are minute to the combined efforts of you three clowns to ridicule me.
You guys are such jokes.
You forget Neuro.....you don't own this place as much as you'd like to....so cry me a river.
Joshua01
22nd April 2016, 07:23 AM
I only keep two idiots in check and that's Palani and Midnight...all this hype about me being a bad person is a result of you, Ximmy and Midnight jumping in throwing rocks when ever I check Palani or midnight.
My little outbursts are minute to the combined efforts of you three clowns to ridicule me.
You guys are such jokes.
You forget Neuro.....you don't own this place as much as you'd like to....so cry me a river.
You were the guy who was picked on in grade school, huh?
7th trump
22nd April 2016, 08:55 AM
You were the guy who was picked on in grade school, huh?
I didn't take shit then either and swung back. They finally got the idea they weren't walking away without a bruise or their ego smashed.
ximmy
22nd April 2016, 11:38 AM
I only keep two idiots in check and that's Palani and Midnight...all this hype about me being a bad person is a result of you, Ximmy and Midnight jumping in throwing rocks when ever I check Palani or midnight.
My little outbursts are minute to the combined efforts of you three clowns to ridicule me.
You guys are such jokes.
You forget Neuro.....you don't own this place as much as you'd like to....so cry me a river.
7th dump, poor victim of ridicule and rejection... a fellow just trying to exist with a hard life. It just brings a tear to your eye.
http://cdn.makeagif.com/media/9-11-2015/E98TrP.gif
mick silver
22nd April 2016, 11:41 AM
again what was found in Antarctica
woodman
22nd April 2016, 08:03 PM
again what was found in Antarctica
Probably a lot there to find. http://www.ancientdestructions.com/piri-reis-map-of-antarctica/
They say man is responsible for the ice caps melting. Doubt'er.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.