PDA

View Full Version : Fox News, Trump unfavorability high - Hillary beats Trump



EE_
24th April 2016, 06:28 PM
Let me see if I have this straight...

Trump just beat out 16 of the best candidates the Republicans have to offer and Hillary can't put away a 75 yr old socialist/communist Jew kook...but Hillary beats Trump in a general election? Are they serious?

If Trump's unfavorability numbers are so high, what does that say for the 16 candidates Trump knocked out of the race?

The bigger the lie?...

Cebu_4_2
24th April 2016, 06:35 PM
Means nothing, just a piece to throw the towel over the sheeples heads. Absolutely zero.

Twisted Titan
25th April 2016, 04:27 AM
kinda like the politician who got caught by his wife in bed with another woman .....he says without missing a beat

Honey, are you going to believe me or your lying eyes??

Half Sense
25th April 2016, 07:21 AM
The media have been stridently shouting this for many months: Hillary beats Trump easily in the general election!!

But they behave as if the opposite is true, totally freaking out at the prospect of Trump getting the nomination, and cheerleading all the GOP efforts to steal the election from Trump. Methinks the real polling data will show at least 60% of voters will NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS VOTE FOR HILLARY, and that includes most Bernie supporters. Hillary is the most flawed candidate I've ever seen.

Joshua01
25th April 2016, 07:23 AM
Yep, MSM polls are all fabricated and lies. I mean really.....how gullible are we? Of course, now that electronic voting machines are becoming the norm the elections are no longer anything close to honest and objective. It's all a sham...like we thought about the Soviet elections back in the 50's and 60's

EE_
25th April 2016, 07:27 AM
The media have been stridently shouting this for many months: Hillary beats Trump easily in the general election!!

But they behave as if the opposite is true, totally freaking out at the prospect of Trump getting the nomination, and cheerleading all the GOP efforts to steal the election from Trump. Methinks the real polling data will show at least 60% of voters will NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS VOTE FOR HILLARY, and that includes most Bernie supporters. Hillary is the most flawed candidate I've ever seen.

If it's stolen from Trump, I'll be voting for Hillary! Anything to destroy the republican party for good.
If Trump is out, the elite will have both party candidates covered, they can no longer lose. At least with Crooked Hillary there's a better chance for a violent revolution by the people.

Half Sense
25th April 2016, 12:47 PM
If it's stolen from Trump you won't have to vote for Hillary. She'll be picking out new White House drapes in August.

Joshua01
25th April 2016, 12:50 PM
If it's stolen from Trump, I'll be voting for Hillary! Anything to destroy the republican party for good.
If Trump is out, the elite will have both party candidates covered, they can no longer lose. At least with Crooked Hillary there's a better chance for a violent revolution by the people.

Sorry, can't vote for the old cow under any circumstances

singular_me
25th April 2016, 12:52 PM
Yep, MSM polls are all fabricated and lies. I mean really.....how gullible are we?

that is what happens when competition/darwin is the model, a logical outcome

aeondaze
25th April 2016, 07:23 PM
When was the last time that either party governed for two consecutive terms under the one president but then got re-elected for a third under the next?

Didn't happen in 2000 with the dems after Bill completed his second term, didn't happen in 2008 after dubya's second term. Infact history tells us Hitlery has almost NO chance!


The Democrats have failed in four of their last five attempts to win three consecutive terms in office after taking two elections with the same candidate (or his legal successor), with just President Roosevelt winning in 1940 under very unusual circumstances.

Among the GOP candidates who were able to win that vital third election in a row for their party were Ulysses S. Grant (1868), Rutherford B. Hayes (1876), Theodore Roosevelt (1904), and George H.W. Bush (1988).

Republican candidates who lost in similar circumstances were Richard Nixon (1960), Gerald Ford (1976), and John McCain (2008).

Even with four defeats, the Republicans were batting .571 when it came to winning a third election, after the same president (or his legal successor) won two elections in a row.

And the thing is EVERYONE knows this but it isn't getting a run in the mainstream. This election is the most obviously corrupt and coersive I've ever seem.

No one likes Hillary! How can these lying sacks of shit even say this stuff with a stright face?

EE_
25th April 2016, 08:05 PM
Kashits is losing it, he's getting very testy with reporters. What a cranky old fucker.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNRRto7u2oc

Shami-Amourae
25th April 2016, 08:10 PM
If it's stolen from Trump, I'll be voting for Hillary! Anything to destroy the republican party for good.
If Trump is out, the elite will have both party candidates covered, they can no longer lose. At least with Crooked Hillary there's a better chance for a violent revolution by the people.

Vote for Idaho's Harley Brown.

He's the anti-PC candidate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k8P8-KViME