PDA

View Full Version : Trump: Controlled Media is Finished!



mick silver
5th May 2016, 04:01 AM
Trump: Controlled Media is Finished!The New Observer (http://newobserveronline.com/trump-controlled-media-finished/)
May 5, 2016
Donald Trump’s victory in taking the Republican Party nomination from under the noses of the establishment has proved, above all else, that the Internet has finally broken the controlled media’s stranglehold on news and information.
Previously, a candidate like Trump would have been smeared out of the race by the controlled media, and also strangled by the campaign funding process which is under the Jewish lobby’s control.
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/packed-trump-rally-618x388.jpg (http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/packed-trump-rally.jpg)

Trump has however been able to punch through the controlled media because of his self-financed campaign, and his ability to use the Internet to speak directly to voters. The US elections of 2016 can in fact, be the first to have been fought and won on the Internet, rather than on the television.
Proof of this is the fact that the anti-Trump faction spent an astonishing $75,723,580 ($75.7 million) on attack TV advertising during the campaign so far, comprising nearly 64,000 ad spots.
That is the figure for broadcast television alone. Anti-Trump ads also ran on cable and satellite television, but the tracking data does not capture that.
A pro-Marco Rubio group spent the most against Trump. Conservative Solutions PAC spent more than one out of every four dollars against Trump—about $19.7 million. One of their spots, “Serious,” was the most-run anti-Trump ad. It ran 3,939 times.
A pro-Ted Cruz group aired the second-most run anti-Trump ad. “Day One” criticizes Trump among other candidates.
The pro-Jeb Bush super PAC Right to Rise USA spent nearly $10 million, the second-most of any group. Hillary Clinton’s campaign spent $5.2 million on ads with anti-Trump messages, the most of any presidential candidate on either side of the aisle.
Cruz’s campaign spent more than any other Republican against Trump, some $4.3 million.
All of this had no effect whatsoever, mainly because Trump supporters were drawing their information directly from the source, rather than—as was previously the case—having to rely on the controlled media’s manipulation and distortion of the “news” to form an opinion.
Trump, for example, has 7.92 million followers on Twitter, and 7.3 million followers on Facebook. There have been millions of views of his speeches in YouTube, and an unknown number of hits on his website, which has an astonishing Alexa ranking of 2,679 in the US.
All of this means an incredible reach, which has completely undone the controlled media’s usual tactics of smear or blackout.
Trump has however had one advantage: no one has ever questioned his loyalty to Israel, or his support for the Jewish lobby.
This fact has unquestionably led to him being “more” tolerated than he would otherwise have been by the media.
Of course, his ability to self-fund his campaign has also played a significant role. Anti-establishment candidates are generally not able to get out of the starting blocks without funding from the Jewish lobby.
Ted Cruz’s dropping out from the race has secured Trump the Republican Party’s nomination—now comes his most difficult task yet: winning the presidential election. (http://newobserveronline.com/can-trump-win-possible-but-unlikely/)

mick silver
5th May 2016, 04:58 AM
Majority Of Germans Think The Media Is Controlled By Political, Economic ElitesSource: Zero Hedge (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-04/majority-germans-think-media-controlled-political-economic-elites)

According to a recent survey (http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/medien-umfrage-des-bayerischen-rundfunks-das-unbehagen-gegenueber-eliten-waechst-a-1090417.html), the majority of people in Germany view the news media as simply a pillar of the government and the powerfully elite. Only one third of the respondents think that the German news media is truly independent,while the majority view the government and parties as having control over particular policies, and the lobbyists and advertisers having control over the economic news.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user51698/imageroot/2016/05/04/20160504_media_0.PNG (http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user51698/imageroot/2016/05/04/20160504_media_0.PNG)
More than half of the respondents viewed the news media as controlled by the "powerful" in the country, a view which manifested in recent years in the wake of going through crisis after crisis as the media began to be viewed simply as part of the system, or, the Fourth Estate.
Another major issue brought forth by the respondents is that the media reports only the problems, never presents any solutions, and when it came to consequences of political decisions very little reporting was done on the impacts those decisions had on the people.
It's apparent that the German people know their history (e.g. Joseph Goebbels), and have a healthy skepticism for the media. It would behoove everyone to have a bit (a lot) of skepticism about what the media tells them each day, as there are undoubtedly agendas that don't include simply reporting the truth.
Of course, when even the president of the European Union admits to lying (http://www.zerohedge.com/article/head-eurogroup-admits-lying-about-secret-greek-meeting-out-fears-market-collapse), what hope is there for ever discovering the facts?
Of course, telling the truth in a world hell-bent on papering over issues and serving as many agendas as possible is a very difficult and unpopular thing to do. Sadly, there are even media outlets out there who try to take out any of their competition trying to do so.
http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user3303/imageroot/20160504_state.png?1462408079



Share This Article...

mick silver
5th May 2016, 05:34 AM
http://dsbbsuploads.s3.amazonaws.com/original/3X/6/f/6f6907df9df96da5eeacd47071d2654d807774de.png

mick silver
5th May 2016, 05:44 AM
Trump’s Message to the DC Foreign-Policy Establishment: 'You’re Fired!'
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-skeptics/trumps-message-the-dc-foreign-policy-establishment-youre-15981

Twisted Titan
5th May 2016, 05:48 AM
The ability to send out a tweet or 2 minute youtube at any given moment is absolutely damaging who has to go through at least 15 channels and 12 meetings before something is done.

In that time the video or tweet went viral and the RESPONDING rather then CONTROLING

monty
5th May 2016, 06:05 AM
Trump: Controlled Media is Finished!

The New Observer (http://newobserveronline.com/trump-controlled-media-finished/)

May 5, 2016

Donald Trump’s victory in taking the Republican Party nomination from under the noses of the establishment has proved, above all else, that the Internet has finally broken the controlled media’s stranglehold on news and information.
Previously, a candidate like Trump would have been smeared out of the race by the controlled media, and also strangled by the campaign funding process which is under the Jewish lobby’s control.

http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/packed-trump-rally-618x388.jpg (http://www.dailystormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/packed-trump-rally.jpg)

Trump has however been able to punch through the controlled media because of his self-financed campaign, and his ability to use the Internet to speak directly to voters. The US elections of 2016 can in fact, be the first to have been fought and won on the Internet, rather than on the television.

Proof of this is the fact that the anti-Trump faction spent an astonishing $75,723,580 ($75.7 million) on attack TV advertising during the campaign so far, comprising nearly 64,000 ad spots.

That is the figure for broadcast television alone. Anti-Trump ads also ran on cable and satellite television, but the tracking data does not capture that.

A pro-Marco Rubio group spent the most against Trump. Conservative Solutions PAC spent more than one out of every four dollars against Trump—about $19.7 million. One of their spots, “Serious,” was the most-run anti-Trump ad. It ran 3,939 times.

A pro-Ted Cruz group aired the second-most run anti-Trump ad. “Day One” criticizes Trump among other candidates.
The pro-Jeb Bush super PAC Right to Rise USA spent nearly $10 million, the second-most of any group. Hillary Clinton’s campaign spent $5.2 million on ads with anti-Trump messages, the most of any presidential candidate on either side of the aisle.

Cruz’s campaign spent more than any other Republican against Trump, some $4.3 million.

All of this had no effect whatsoever, mainly because Trump supporters were drawing their information directly from the source, rather than—as was previously the case—having to rely on the controlled media’s manipulation and distortion of the “news” to form an opinion.

Trump, for example, has 7.92 million followers on Twitter, and 7.3 million followers on Facebook. There have been millions of views of his speeches in YouTube, and an unknown number of hits on his website, which has an astonishing Alexa ranking of 2,679 in the US.

All of this means an incredible reach, which has completely undone the controlled media’s usual tactics of smear or blackout.

Trump has however had one advantage: no one has ever questioned his loyalty to Israel, or his support for the Jewish lobby.

This fact has unquestionably led to him being “more” tolerated than he would otherwise have been by the media.
Of course, his ability to self-fund his campaign has also played a significant role. Anti-establishment candidates are generally not able to get out of the starting blocks without funding from the Jewish lobby.

Ted Cruz’s dropping out from the race has secured Trump the Republican Party’s nomination—now comes his most difficult task yet: winning the presidential election. (http://newobserveronline.com/can-trump-win-possible-but-unlikely/)

midnight rambler
5th May 2016, 06:06 AM
Fake media never calls out fake actor CLEARLY faking. Who believes this shit??


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2ZynkD3N_k

Oh, it gets better, fake actor fakes a cough then fakes actually drinking water AGAIN -


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tBbfaMsZPo

mick silver
5th May 2016, 06:45 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChpvlFSUUAIizBu.jpg

mick silver
5th May 2016, 06:46 AM
did he drink the water are just act like he did ... seen it last night it look fake to me
Fake media never calls out fake actor CLEARLY faking. Who believes this shit??


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2ZynkD3N_k

Oh, it gets better, fake actor fakes a cough then fakes actually drinking water AGAIN -


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tBbfaMsZPo

boogietillyapuke
5th May 2016, 06:46 AM
Fake media never calls out fake actor CLEARLY faking. Who believes this shit?

Yeah I saw it almost first hand. Took long enough to get that glass, only way I believe that shit is if I see it come out of the tap. He was at a northern city high school, my mother and sister live on the south side.

I almost went went to the airport. I wanted to see that 747 land at Bishop Airport. I did see a C-17 take off just before full dark.

Empty water bottles all over my mothers house, good thing they instituted a recycle program and tonight I get to put out the trash. :cool:

Shami-Amourae
5th May 2016, 07:16 AM
http://dsbbsuploads.s3.amazonaws.com/original/3X/3/6/365afc77e12e65317b37e13db614084de76a3a7c.jpg

http://dsbbsuploads.s3.amazonaws.com/optimized/3X/1/e/1ebace5149d1a6887d2191d2544ed85b1570dc77_1_690x461 .jpg

Blink
5th May 2016, 07:44 AM
What a narrative around this guy. Controlled media? How about controlled candidates. What a gong show....

Shami-Amourae
5th May 2016, 07:54 AM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1462/40/1462400243996.png