PDA

View Full Version : World War III? Pentagon Sends Troops to Libya



mick silver
17th May 2016, 07:29 AM
World War III? Pentagon Sends Troops to Libya
By Daily Bell Staff - May 16, 2016


http://sovman-w3tc-thedailybell.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/themes/profprojects/theme-files/printer.png (javascript:print();)
http://sovman-w3tc-thedailybell.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/themes/profprojects/theme-files/font-size.png (javascript:void(0))




U.S. military upping anti-ISIS activity in Libya … The Pentagon is slightly expanding its efforts to counter ISIS activity in Libya, sending in small teams of troops to try to establish relationships with groups that may be able to form a new nationwide government, according to a U.S. defense official familiar with the operation. -CNN
The US is sending troops into Libya.
Libya is seen as a dysfunctional state by Western powers that prefer a unified government that provides “civil order.” Now the US military is “upping” its presence
It is questionable as to whether order and civil society are the inevitable outcome of central government. But the Pentagon and State Dept. seem to believe that.
More:

U.S. troops, which the Pentagon is calling “contact teams,” are traveling into key areas and meeting with leaders from all groups to see about possible cooperation and eventually what assistance the U.S. could provide if a government can be formed.
Hillary Clinton famously said, “We came, we saw, he died,” referring to Muammar Gaddafi. But this didn’t turn out to be the last chapter.
It’s not just Libya. The US military just decided to put “boots on the ground” in Yemen.
Here from Infowars:

The war in Yemen was already being waged with US weapons, including mostly banned cluster bombs via Saudi Arabia, but now American special forces of an undisclosed number are going to participate in combat operations.
The Pentagon says the special forces in Yemen will serve in advisory capacity, but for how long is unknown. Department of Defense spokesman Peter Cook admitted there is no exit strategy: “It’s going to be a limited period of time, but I don’t have a particular deadline.”
The US is in Syria too. Global Research:

Syrians Burn American Flag, Protest against Illegal Presence of US Soldiers … A similar rally had earlier been held on Wednesday as local residents called for American Troops expulsion from their country.
… On April 28, US President Barack Obama announced that Washington would “deploy up to 250 additional US personnel in Syria including Special Forces.” They are reportedly expected to train the Syrian Democratic Forces. The US administration, however, argues that their move is not illegal and the US does not need the Syrian government’s approval.
Iraq and Afghanistan have US “boots on the ground” as well. US military presence is all over the Middle East.
This is how you build modern war. You create an “enemy,” Al Qaeda or ISIS, and then you supply and cultivate that enemy until you can send troops in to “oppose it.”

In the past several hundred years almost every major war has been artificial – arranged, in other words. But starting in the early 1700s after the terrible Napoleonic Wars, people became distrustful and resentful.
There is even speculation this was a reason for the United States: To create a non-European country that could prosecute ongoing military actions.
And it is true that the US has been engaged in one war or another on a an almost-continual basis since inception.
Of course, in the 20th century two major “world wars” were prosecuted along with a Cold War.
The world wars are presented as the result of German aggression, but closer study reveals that both wars were likely engineered by the Anglosphere.
Various international alliances were formed that almost guaranteed violence. And in the case of World War I, the two greatest opponents of impending war – Archduke Ferdinand and Rasputin – were attacked. Ferdinand was shot and Rasputin was stabbed but lived.
When it comes to World War II, there is plenty of evidence that the West funded Hitler and Germany to set off yet another war.
Part of the reason for these wars may have been to build international government. After World War I, the League of Nations was created but ultimately failed.
After World War II, the entire panoply of modern global governance was created: the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the United Nations. The Bank for International Settlements was updated and gradually various global trade agreements were implemented.
Globalization continues in spurts. Recently, the Panama Papers have been used to justify an international registry of private companies that will be available for anyone to look at. And tax enforcement is going to be extended internationally, supervised by the IMF.
Wars are started a little differently these days. First, a threat is manufactured and then Western troops are slowly injected into the conflict
Over time, the Western involvement becomes more and more significant. That is why the presence of troops in the Middle East is a harbinger of violence to come. The ground is being prepared for a major conflict.
In the past, various forms of “conspiratorial” literature have predicted three world wars. The first two have taken place and the third supposedly will be a religious war emanating, potentially, from the Middle East.
Such conspiracy theories are of course un-provable and perhaps erroneous. But the gradual expansion of Western – US – troops in the Middle East is not a good sign.
Conclusion: If properly planned, violence can expand anywhere. The question is, who’s doing the planning and do they have a timeline? Those are questions we’ll continue to try to answer. You should too.

Tagged with: STAFF NEWS & ANALYSIS (http://www.thedailybell.com/tag/staff-news-analysis/)

Joshua01
17th May 2016, 07:30 AM
Nothing new here. We send troops everywhere to die for freedom :o

mick silver
17th May 2016, 08:05 AM
Weapons Headed to Libya – Hillary Clinton’s Interventionist Disaster Continues to Spiral Out of ControlSource: Michael Krieger, Liberty Blitzkrieg (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/05/16/weapons-headed-to-libya-hillary-clintons-interventionist-disaster-continues-to-spiral-out-of-control/)

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Screen-Shot-2016-05-16-at-2.43.57-PM.jpg
In retrospect, Obama’s intervention in Libya was an abject failure, judged even by its own standards. Libya has not only failed to evolve into a democracy; it has devolved into a failed state. Violent deaths and other human rights abuses have increased severalfold. Rather than helping the United States combat terrorism, as Qaddafi did during his last decade in power, Libya now serves as a safe haven for militias affiliated with both al Qaeda and the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS). The Libya intervention has harmed other U.S. interests as well: undermining nuclear nonproliferation, chilling Russian cooperation at the UN, and fueling Syria’s civil war.

As bad as Libya’s human rights situation was under Qaddafi, it has gotten worse since NATO ousted him. Immediately after taking power, the rebels perpetrated scores of reprisal killings, in addition to torturing, beating, and arbitrarily detaining thousands of suspected Qaddafi supporters. The rebels also expelled 30,000 mostly black residents from the town of Tawergha and burned or looted their homes and shops, on the grounds that some of them supposedly had been mercenaries. Six months after the war, Human Rights Watch declared that the abuses “appear to be so widespread and systematic that they may amount to crimes against humanity.”

As a consequence of such pervasive violence, the UN estimates that roughly 400,000 Libyans have fled their homes, a quarter of whom have left the country altogether. 

– From the post: The Forgotten War – Understanding the Incredible Debacle Left Behind by NATO in Libya (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/02/23/the-forgotten-war-understanding-the-incredible-debacle-left-behind-by-natos-libya-intervention/)
Earlier today, The Guardian (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/16/libya-ministers-vienna-plan-help-government-gain-foothold?CMP=share_btn_tw) published an article detailing how foreign leaders were gathering in Vienna to discuss how to address the humanitarian disaster/ISIS haven they themselves created in Libya. As usual, the key agenda item revolved around whether the U.S. and its allies should ship weapons into the arena to inspire, you know, freedom and democracy.
Reading the piece leaves you with a clear sense of what a quagmire it really is. For example:

Leading foreign ministers from Europe and the Middle East are to meet in Vienna on Monday under the joint chairmanship of the US and Italy to discuss how to bolster support for the UN-backed Libyan government in the face of deepening splits in the country over political legitimacy, oil resources and Islamic State.
Special forces from the US, UK, France and Italy are operating in various parts of Libya, sometimes backing different military forces and hindering efforts to reunite Libyan politics (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/30/chief-libyas-un-backed-government-fayez-sarraj-arrives-tripoli) behind the UN government of Fayez al-Sarraj.
Remember this paragraph for later.

Sarraj has been trying to broaden his authority in Tripoli since he and his political allies arrived in late March, taking over key institutions such as the central bank and the National Oil Corporation, but he still faces a rival administration, and military power, in the east.Disputes between the factions are such that bankers on one side are depriving the other access to the code to a bank vault containing badly needed cash to pay staff. Different groups are also trying to export oil.
Officials say that at the Vienna meeting on Monday, which will be held under the joint chairmanship of the US and Italy, the fledgling Tripoli administration is likely to submit a list of requests for western partners to assist its forces with arms, training and intelligence. The meeting will be chaired by the US secretary of state, John Kerry, and the Italian foreign minister, Paolo Gentiloni.
The Libyan government – the putative Government of National Accord (GNA) – has struggled to take hold because a minority of the House of Representatives – the Libyan parliament – has refused to provide its backing, leaving the government without the majority required.
In a further complication some western-backed countries, notably the UAE and Egypt, are backing a bigger role for the rival forces of General Khalifa Haftar’s Libyan National Army based in the east.
In a new development the rival military factions from east and west claim to be gathering forces to take on Isis at its base in Sirte (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/10/isis-libya-united-nations-gaddafi-sirte-nationalistic-narrative) on the Libyan coast, but there are fears that they will end up fighting each other.
You really can’t make this stuff up.
Fortunately, a fleeting voice of sanity emerged from the wilderness.

But in a country overflowing with arms, some argue that lifting an embargo is unwise.
Before the summit, Mattia Toaldo, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, urged the west to hold back from focussing on military solutions. He said: “Europeans now have what they asked for, namely a unity government ruling from the capital. They should take care not to burden it with unrealistic demands, from ending the migrant crisis to defeating Isis. Instead, the west should work to strengthen the government’s political control over the country.”
Good suggestion, but I think we’ll pass. As Bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-16/libya-request-for-arms-to-fight-islamic-state-wins-kerry-support) reports, prepare to open the weapons floodgates…

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry backed providing weapons to Libya’s unity government to assist in the fight against Islamic State and other jihadist groups, a move endorsed (http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2016/05/257236.htm) at a meeting of top diplomats of nations from Italy and the U.K. to Russia and Saudi Arabia.
The idea “makes sense,” Kerry said after talks in Vienna with the head of the unity administration, Fayez al-Sarraj, and representatives of more than 20 nations. Sarraj said his Government of National Accord would supply the United Nations with a list of weapons it needs “as soon as possible.” The UN would have to provide exemptions to an arms embargo before weapons could be shipped.

The envoys met in the Austrian capital to discuss ways to bolster Sarraj’s UN-backed government, the most significant attempt so far to end the violence that has fractured Libya since the ouster of former leader Muammar Qaddafi in 2011. But Sarraj has yet to win the support of powerful armed factions based in Libya’s east, which are contesting control of the crucial oil industry.
Gotta love the media. They make is sound as if Libya just stumbled into its current situation via some freak historical accident. In reality, we know the whole thing is essentially the handiwork of Presidential candidate, and neocon warmonger extraordinaire, Hillary Clinton.
For more, see: “We Came, We Saw, He Died” – Revisiting the Incredible Disaster That Is Libya (https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/01/07/we-came-we-saw-he-died-revisiting-the-incredible-disaster-that-is-libya/)

“It is imperative to put the international community’s full weight behind the Government of National Accord,” Kerry said. “It is the only way to ensure that vital institutions such as the central bank and the national oil company, that they fall under representative and acknowledged authority.”
The central bank and Libyan oil. At least he’s honest about what matters.

The unity government was formed under a UN-mediated peace deal last year. The agreement is backed by Western allies as the only way to stem spiraling unrest that has plagued the North African nation and enabled Islamic State to expand along the southern Mediterranean coast.
Once again, Bloomberg acts as if this unrest just spontaneously erupted out of nowhere.

Italian Foreign Minister Paolo Gentiloni, who joined the gathering of diplomats at the roughly three-hour meeting in Vienna, ruled out a wholesale lifting of the UN arms embargo but said humanitarian aid and weapons could help Sarraj’s government bring stability to the country.
Speaking at the briefing with Kerry and Sarraj, Gentiloni also ruled out putting “boots on the ground” in Libya, while pledging support in “several security dimensions.”
“The international community stands ready and the U.S. stands ready to provide humanitarian, economic and security support,” said Kerry, who added that nobody is talking about inserting troops into the conflict.
What a relief. At least Kerry and Gentiloni are promising no boots on the ground! There’s just one minor problem. Recall what we learned from The Guardian article earlier. Yeah that’s right, this…
Special forces from the US, UK, France and Italy are operating in various parts of Libya, sometimes backing different military forces and hindering efforts to reunite Libyan politics (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/30/chief-libyas-un-backed-government-fayez-sarraj-arrives-tripoli) behind the UN government of Fayez al-Sarraj.
So not only are there already Western boots on the ground, but these boots are fighting each other.
The whole affair is reminiscent of a similar promise I heard once before: Obama Announces “Boots on the Ground” in Syria, Despite Promising “No Boots on the Ground” 16 Times (https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/10/30/obama-announces-boots-on-the-ground-in-syria-despite-promising-no-boots-on-the-ground-16-times/)
Even better, we don’t have to go back to The Guardian article to point out the obvious Kerry “no boots” lie. It’s right there in next paragraph of the same Bloomberg article…

Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook told reporters in Washington on Monday that “small teams of U.S. forces” already have gone into Libya to gather intelligence on the ground about Islamic State forces expanding their foothold in the country.
“If Syria and Iraq would end tomorrow, then Libya would definitely be No. 1” for Islamic State, he said. “Libya is very much already a hub.”
Yes, America, they really do think you’re that stupid. They think you’re such schmucks, you’ll still vote for Hillary despite the fact that she was the driving force behind the Libya intervention while Secretary of State.
If you want to know what a Hillary presidency will look like, just take a look at Libya.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is a sociopath in action:

For more on Libya, see:
“We Came, We Saw, He Died” – Revisiting the Incredible Disaster That Is Libya (https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2016/01/07/we-came-we-saw-he-died-revisiting-the-incredible-disaster-that-is-libya/)
The Forgotten War – Understanding the Incredible Debacle Left Behind by NATO in Libya (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/02/23/the-forgotten-war-understanding-the-incredible-debacle-left-behind-by-natos-libya-intervention/)
Before We Bomb Syria, What’s Happening in Libya? (https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/09/04/before-we-bomb-syria-whats-happening-in-libya/)
Tunisian Terror Attack Suspects Trained in U.S. “Liberated” Libya (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/03/24/tunisian-terror-attack-suspects-trained-in-u-s-liberated-libya/)
Incredible Tweets from John McCain on Libya and Syria from 2009 and 2011 (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2013/09/03/incredible-tweets-from-john-mccain-on-libya-and-syria-from-2009-and-2011/)
How the Clinton Foundation Paid Sidney Blumenthal $10K per Month as He Gave Horrible Libya Advice to the State Dept. (http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/05/28/how-the-clinton-foundation-paid-sidney-blumenthal-10k-per-month-as-he-gave-horrible-libya-advice-to-the-state-dept/)
In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Share This Article...

Jewboo
10th October 2016, 07:22 PM
http://bbs.dailystormer.com/uploads/default/original/3X/b/b/bbf08838d8375c879280a2fa18b5853241642351.jpg

JohnQPublic
10th October 2016, 07:48 PM
Nothing new here. We send troops everywhere to die for freedom Israel :o

Fixed it for ya.

Jerrylynnb
10th October 2016, 09:22 PM
Daily Bell Staff says (above - post #1):

"When it comes to World War II, there is plenty of evidence that the West funded Hitler and Germany to set off yet another war."

Bullshit.

This is a popular singsong by idiots who swallow post WW2 propaganda without bothering to educate themselves as a true scholar would.

What guaranteed the war was when Roosevelt sent his guy to Warsaw to incite the Poles (that is, the jews running Poland) to increase their violence and tyranny against the 3-4 million German nationals who suffered under Polish occupation, set up by the heinous Treaty of Versailles. These Germans (such as the ones living in Danzig) had to endure the unendurable as the damnable Polish jews subjected them to horrifying treatment. Finally, in the fall of 1939, every night hordes of West Prussian Germans came running over the German border, fleeing from the Polish forces and running for their lives. The stories they told left Germany with NO OPTION but to send in their troops to protect the German nationals still living in West Prussia (under Polish Occupation) from disregard for life and limb by the Poles (as per memo's from Roosevelt).

Very similar to what General Pershing did, invading northern Mexico a mere 34 years earlier to protect Americans from the tyranny they were suffering at the hands of Pancho Villa and his great following of "bandidos". Nobody ever charged the US with starting a world war, even though what Germany did in Poland was based on the same principle - to protect a nation's citizens from threats to life and limb.

It was Roosevelt, with his assurances to the Poles, as revealed in the documents captured by the fast advancing Germans so that they stormed the US embassy in Warsaw and read for themselves Roosevelt's assurances that the Poles needn't take care for the rights of Germans under their occupation.

The folks at the Daily Bell just need to take the post-ww2-propaganda-ear-wax out of their heads and get a little TRUE education before assuming all the nonsense strewn around (like cow manure on a weed field) about Hitler and Germany. It is not only irritating when so-called journalists, or pundits in the public eye, hang onto phoney baloney propaganda way past it "use by" date, but downright silly, like a 3rd rate carnival clown who just isn't ready for the stage.