View Full Version : How did Jews get so smart?
Alex Drone
28th May 2016, 06:49 PM
Hello, I am new to this forum. I've always been puzzled by the high IQ levels of Ashkenazi Jews. Their IQ is 110-120, while all the other races are below 105. How did it get that way? Was it through eugenics or sheer luck? Their intelligence along with their tribalism certainly has propelled them to get to the top.
Cebu_4_2
28th May 2016, 06:54 PM
Hello, I am new to this forum. I've always been puzzled by the high IQ levels of Ashkenazi Jews. Their IQ is 110-120, while all the other races are below 105. How did it get that way? Was it through eugenics or sheer luck? Their intelligence along with their tribalism certainly has propelled them to get to the top.
The Jews put out the IQ test.
Joshua01
28th May 2016, 06:57 PM
The Jews put out the IQ test.
They run those machines like they run the voting machines
osoab
28th May 2016, 06:57 PM
Welcome. Learn fast.
hoarder
28th May 2016, 06:58 PM
Eugenics. Yes they are very clever.
Cebu_4_2
28th May 2016, 07:11 PM
They infiltrated by coercion against their own. A jew can go anywhere and be lifelong friends or cling ons until they get what they want. They have a force between them to support each other but will take each other out including their brother, sisters and family to reach the final goal.
Us lame goy wont do that because we have 'morals' and don't follow the talimud. This is the big difference between the races. If you are a goy and are willing to kill your brother and sister, your mom and dad, grandparents to get what you want you are getting close to qualifying as a jew.
I hope this helps your science project on infiltrating a non promotional anti jew site.
mick silver
28th May 2016, 07:16 PM
“Now remember, when things look bad and it looks like you’re not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean, mad-dog mean. ‘Cause if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live nor win. That’s just the way it is.” ~ Outlaw Josey Wales…
7th trump
28th May 2016, 07:33 PM
Any race that parasites another to survive is not intelligent.
What you are witnessing is the end times where the hand of God using his enemy to correct His chosen. And when He's finished He'll allow them to return to what they really are by virtue of exposing them....worthless parasites.
They will be begging you, at your feet, for forgiveness because their existence is hinged upon forgiveness.
As a note, we are all judged by the same scale whether you're a black, white, yellow or even His enemy the fake chosen. In the end the wicked are uncreated by destruction. They will not exist any longer and any memory of them will be erased.....this is referenced as "perished" any time you come across that word in the Bible.
Jewboo
28th May 2016, 07:42 PM
Any race that parasites another to survive is not intelligent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN2XMyxAs5o
Israel & America
:o
mick silver
28th May 2016, 07:55 PM
https://cdn.superstation95.com/cache/resized/ed7d67b870bcc2b0fbe630c372030159.jpg?1464481097Pop ulation Control is Working, or is It?Population control of the successful middle class was working. Now we (the elite) moved on to setting up more government regulations that could steal back the wealth of the middle class. We decided to also print dollars to steal their wealth with devaluation and give them easy-to-obtain debt. Without a good financial education, the middle class would crater under the ease in obtaining more debt. Now we can charge them fees for being overdrawn and overdue! They won’t and don’t know how to manage wealth. (Remember? We didn’t allow them any financial education.)
Well, that is an easy explanation of what happened since the 1999 Act that deregulated the ruling elite– the Glass-Stegall Act. If you are not familiar with this deregulation of the banks, please study and use a filter. In essence, it was the beginning of the end of our middle class wealth. It started slowly with overdraft fees, then ATM fees, and then moved to force the middle class into bankruptcy
mick silver
28th May 2016, 08:00 PM
https://cdn.superstation95.com/media/k2/items/cache/1162815ad9bf895f2061c0defe3b0cae_XL.jpg?1464319722
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:01 PM
Neanderthals Were Too Smart to Survive
Intelligence is nothing when communication is lacking
Dec 21, 2005 09:41 GMT · By Vlad Tarko (http://news.softpedia.com/editors/browse/vlad-tarko) · Share:
How can we account for the fact that Neanderthals had bigger cranial capacity than Homo Sapiens but nonetheless they were eventually eliminated? Bigger cranial capacity is correlated with higher mental abilities, thus we are led into believing the Neanderthals were, on the average, smarter than us. How it is than that our ancestors managed to gradually eliminate them?
Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens are two different species that both evolved from Homo Erectus. There was a long debate over the question whether Neanderthals were indeed a different species than Homo Sapiens. Some claimed that, in fact, Neanderthals could crossbreed with Homo Sapiens and that modern humans are the result of this interbreeding. However, tests comparing Neanderthal and modern human mitochondrial DNA show too great a dissimilarity for Neanderthals to have contributed to the human mitochondrial genome. Thus, it seems settled that Neanderthals were indeed wiped out by the arrival of Homo Sapiens in Europe.
But the story is more complicated. Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals appeared from different Homo Erectus populations and inherited different kinds of technological culture. As it happened, Neanderthals inherited the more advanced culture. By "technological culture" it is meant particular techniques of stone toolmaking. Neanderthals had better stone tools.
Neanderthals spread mostly to Europe and in some parts of Asia. When Homo Sapiens first spread from Africa, around 100 000 years ago, they did not manage to enter Europe, presumably because of Neanderthals, and spread to Asia. However, around 45 000 years ago, when Homo Sapiens had developed the Cro-Magnon type of stone tools, they returned to Europe. This time Neanderthals apparently didn't stand a chance. What happened during that period of around 55 000 years?
Neanderthals were the first humans who buried their dead and they developed better stone tools. It was recently discovered that they also created art figures. However, during the same period of time Homo Sapiens developed much further and faster. Relative to Homo Sapiens' advances in stone tool making Neanderthals look like stagnating. In other words, although Neanderthals were definitely a great advance compared to Homo Erectus, their inventiveness was no match for the Homo Sapiens. But how do we resolve this with the fact that the Neanderthals were probably more intelligent than us?
We can restate the question more precisely: "How do we resolve this with the fact that the Neanderthal individual was probably more intelligent than a modern human individual?" The cranial capacity tells us something about the individuals' mental abilities, but it tells us almost nothing about the social aspects of life.
Studying the inventiveness of Homo Sapiens scientists have found that literally all the major innovations that have changed the way we live, from the use of fire, to agriculture, to writing etc., have developed only in a few places. For example agriculture appeared independently only in around seven places on the entire planet. All the rest of human populations that engaged in farming did it because they had learned it from somebody. Therefore, the most important aspect of inventiveness is not the ability to invent, but the ability to transmit and to preserve innovations.
This gives us an important clue to why Neanderthals failed in the competition with Homo Sapiens. One of the most important means by which innovations are preserved and transmitted is language. Neanderthals had language themselves. This was proven in 1983 when a Neanderthal hyoid bone was found at the Kebara Cave in Israel. The hyoid is a small bone that holds the root of the tongue in place, a requirement to human speech and, therefore, its presence seems to imply some ability to speak. Recent studies found that due to the physical characteristics of Neanderthals' hyoid and the fact that their larynx was stouter than that of modern man, the average note emitted by Neanderthals were high pitched and sharper than that of modern man. This contradicts the stereotype of Neanderthals having ape-like grunts. However, the base of the Neanderthal tongue was positioned higher in the throat, crowding the mouth somewhat. As a result, Neanderthal speech would most likely have been slow-paced and nasalized.
The overall conclusion would be that, although Neanderthals did have the ability to speak, they were capable of articulating only a smaller number of phonemes. Jared Diamond described this limitation using the following example: imagine how many words you could say if the only sounds you were able to make were a, u, c, p. Imagine trying to say "Trinity College is a fine place to work." All you could say were something like "Capupa Cappap up a cap capupap."
This means that in order to transmit certain information much longer propositions are required.
(Apes like the chimpanzee also have the same type of problem. They are able to understand language and they can even be taught how to use the sign language, but they cannot actually speak due to their improper larynx. It is also interesting to remark that the shape of our larynx, a feature that enables us to speak, also has disadvantages: we can choke with food.)
Thus, it seems that the ultimate reason behind Neanderthals extinction was not due to their mental capacities but to the shape of their larynx.
Read more: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Neanderthals-were-too-smart-to-survive-15264.shtml#ixzz4A0RSLsnL
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:03 PM
Here's where wikipedia says the neanderthals were:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/25/Range_of_Homo_neanderthalensis.png
Here's kazaria:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a9/Chasaren.jpg
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:04 PM
More on the Neanderthal appearance 22 June 2008
Nobody alive today is a Neanderthal, but many prehistoric genetic traits are still in our gene pool, so prehistoric qualities can appear at random in the human population. People who believe that humans were created by God have to blame bad behavior on the devil or some intangible concept such as poverty or ignorance. But if you believe that humans evolved from monkeys, then the crude behavior we see in humans today can be explained as the result of people who are more like primitive savages.
Drawing of a Neanderthal
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Neanderthal-simulation.jpg
This particular skull did not have a protruding mouth, and the artist assumed the nose was small
The skeletons of prehistoric humans show sloping foreheads, brow ridges, and short, angled necks. A lot of modern men inherited some of those prehistoric physical traits.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Spike-Lee.jpg Spike Lee (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000490/)
Dov Zakheim, the Pentagon's comptroller and chief financial officer from May 2001 to May 2004. He was unable to account for $2.3 trillion in the Pentagon budget. Are slanted foreheads as common among respectable people as they are among criminals?
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Dov-Zakheim.jpg
The skeletons of prehistoric humans were slightly different from one another, but they all had a slanted forehead, large face, and short, angled neck.
When artists add flesh to a Neanderthal skull, some of them resemble people living today.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Neanderthal-2.jpg
It's easier to see the differences by looking at the skulls. Prehistoric humans had a sloping forehead and a larger face, nose, and mouth.
Neanderthal (left) | Cro-Magnon (right)
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Neanderthal-Cro-Magnon.jpg
In the very primitive skulls, their massive mouth protruded forward, and their chin receded.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Neanderthal-and-Cro-Magnon-skulls.jpg
Their brain was large, and they were probably very intelligent, but they certainly had slightly different personalities and abilities.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Neanderthal-and-Cro-Magnon-comparison.gif
This Russian boxer, Nikolay Valuev, looks normal in a photograph that shows him from the front, but he has an extremely slanted forehead.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Nikolay-Valuev-front.jpg
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Nikolai-Valuev-boxing.jpg
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Nikolai-Valuev.jpg
He has a massive skeleton, also. A normal man can't develop such a massive body simply by taking steroids or getting exercise. You have to inherit the prehistoric genetic traits.
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:04 PM
Rodney Rhines of Ohio doesn't have a sloping forehead, but he has the protruding mouth of a primitive human. This feature is not noticeable in a front view. Did he inherit prehistoric genetic traits? If so, that could explain why his behavior has been crude.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Rodney-Rhines.jpg
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Drawing-Neaderthal-Cro-Magnon.gif
Neanderthals and other primitive humans were shorter than modern Northern Europeans, and they had a stronger, more massive body. Their posture was different, also. They had a short neck that came out of their body at an angle, whereas modern man has a longer neck that is more vertical.
Below: Israeli Prime Minister Olmert and two security guards.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Olmert-after-Israeli-suicide.jpg
A lot of Jews have the physical qualities of prehistoric humans, such as a big face, big nose, short neck, and slanted forehead. Is this just a coincidence? Or are Jews more genetically similar to primitive savages than the rest of us?
Is there such a thing as a "Napoleon Complex"?
Some people have created the theory that short men are suffering from an "inferiority complex", and that they behave in an abnormally aggressive manner in order to prove something to us. Psychologists refer to this as a Napoleon Complex. But why do only some short men have this complex? And why do some tall men behave in the same manner?
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Napoleon_Bonapartes.jpg
Perhaps the men who are abnormally aggressive inherited a lot of primitive genetic qualities, thereby giving them a mind that is more similar to our prehistoric ancestors.
Richard Branson and many other successful business executives have aggressive personalities, and often a massive skeleton, and they seem to enjoy fighting for dominance, just like a dumb animal. Is this just a coincidence? Or do these men have a mind that is similar to our prehistoric ancestors?
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Richard-Branson.jpg
I was a teenager when I first noticed that many men in leadership positions have massive bodies, and that their primary interest in life seemes to be fighting to be the dominant male. They didn't seem to care about society, or pollution, or crime, or the cities they live in. Their only concern in life seemed to be acquiring material items and showing off so that they could feel important. Their behavior reminded me of male animals. As a teenager, the only explanation I could come up with was that their testicles were producing excessive amounts of male hormones. Today I wonder if their aggressive, animal-like behavior is because they inherited a lot of primitive genetic traits, resulting in a mind that is more like a primitive savage than a modern human.
Why do airline seats promote bad posture?
Years ago I noticed that lots of chairs, such as automobile and airline seats, assume your head is not vertical over your back. In the case of airline seats, they put a pad behind your head, which I found irritating.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/airline-seats-with-headrest.jpg
I assumed that chairs were designed for the majority of people, and that the majority had bad posture, but perhaps some of the people who were used as measurements for chairs had that primitive, Neanderthal quality of a short neck that comes out of their backbone at an angle rather than upright.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/primitive-human-sideview.jpg
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:05 PM
Below are more people with physical qualities of prehistoric humans
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Don-King.jpg
Don King (http://www.donking.com/Template_New.aspx?html=new_home.htm&left=1)
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/L-Ron-Hubbard.jpg
L. Ron Hubbard, who created Scientology and Dianetics. Some people think the tiny upper lip and large lower lip is most common with Jews.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Al-Sharpton.jpg
Al Sharpton (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Sharpton#2008_presidential_race), one of the men who has been approved of by the Jews to be a "leader of the black community".
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Ben-Stein.jpg
Ben Stein, a speechwriter for Presidents Nixon and Ford. He is currently struggling (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57840) to convince us (with his movie Expelled (http://expelledthemovie.com/)) that evolution is nonsense.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Sergey-Brin.jpg
Sergey Brin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Brin), a Russian Jew who helped create Google, has only a slightly sloping forehead, but he has the large nose, protruding mouth, and receding chin of a Neanderthal. His partner, Larry page, is similar.
Was Google wildly successful because these two men are incredibly talented? Or do they work with the global Jewish crime network?
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Ralph-Nader.jpg
Ralph Nader has a slightly sloping forehead and a short, angled neck. People assume that he is an honest, loving person who cares about society, but he blames the world's problems on corporations. The people he promotes are of no value, either. Example: he wrote the foreword for ex-Senator Mike Gravel's book (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKn618lGb74), Citizen Power, and he endorsed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLj9AFm0ODg) Gravel for president.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Amy-Winehouse.jpg
Amy Winehouse, a famous singer in Britain, seems to have a protruding mouth and receding chin.
The large face and protruding mouth can be seen in this artist reconstruction of a Neanderthal skull.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Neanderthal-drawing.jpg
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Sam-Newhouse.jpg
Sam Newhouse, one of the Jews in control of America's media, seems to have a protruding mouth and other primitive features.
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:06 PM
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Rick-Federman-in-Aimee-Ron-Paul-video.jpg
Rick Federman (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1168945/), an actor. The image is from the video (http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=7570) he appeared in to promote Congressman Ron Paul
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Peter-Paul.jpg
Peter Paul (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_F._Paul) has a slightly sloping forehead. He is a lawyer involved in the campaign fund-raising scandal of Hillary Clinton
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Ali-Larijani.jpg
Ali Larijani, Iran's negotiator for nuclear issues. He has meetings with other people (http://www.daylife.com/photo/0fqx1mZbid0BD) who also have slanted foreheads. The EU seems to be full of these people.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Tom-Daschle.jpg
Senator Tom Daschle
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Alex-Jones-at-Bilderberg.jpg
Alex Jones has a sloping forehead, a large body, and short, angled neck. I also have him on my page 5 here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/More-Neanderthals-5.html#Jones) about teeth, and on my main page here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Blame-the-Neanderthals.html#Jones). In case you didn't know, I have this (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/Alex-Jones-summary.html) page that explains how he and other "truth seekers" are trying to protect the Jewish crime network by deceiving us into thinking the world's problems are coming from a small group of "Globalists".
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/fake-Paul-McCartney.jpg
The man who claims to be Paul McCartney. Take a look at the evidence (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Paul-McCartney.html) that the real McCartney died, or was murdered, in 1966.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Paul-Allen.jpg
Paul Allen of Microsoft
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Javier-Solana.jpg
Javier-Solana (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/cms3_applications/applications/solana/index.asp?lang=EN&cmsid=246), of the European Union
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Steve-Balmer.jpg
Steve Ballmer of Microsoft Corp. has a brow ridge and a short angled neck. He also seems to have a large face; look at the distance between his nose and mouth.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Philippe-Douste-Blazy.jpg
Philippe Douste Blazy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Douste-Blazy), of France, currently a UN special adviser
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:07 PM
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Larry-Flint.jpg
Larry Flynt, the publisher of Hustler magazine
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Walt-Disney.jpg
Walt Disney
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Jim-Hansen.jpg
Dr. James Hansen, Ph.D., the world expert on global warming, has a slightly slanted forehead and a short neck. Don't be impressed by Hanson's Ph.D. Judge him and other college graduates by what they actually do in their life.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Global-warming/James-Hansen.jpg
His college cap certainly does hide his slanted forehead, but it doesn't prove that he is intelligent or honest. I have several articles about global warming here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/philosophy.html#Global). To summarize them:
• The Earth's climate is always changing.
• Humans may have an influence over the climate.
• The scientists are not trying to understand what's happening or help us. Rather, the Jewish crime network is trying to use the issue to justify manipulating us with taxes and regulations.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Elton-John.jpg
Elton John seems to have a slightly sloping forehead.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Jerry-Springer-closeup.jpg
A close-up of Jerry Springer's nose is interesting. At my main page for Neanderthals, you can see that he also seems to have a slanted forehead (here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Blame-the-Neanderthals.html#Springer)).
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/New-Guinea-native.jpg
A native in New Guinea who is being taught about shaving his beard (the white material is shaving cream).
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Benji-Lovitt.jpg
Benji Lovitt, a comedian in Tel Aviv. Notice his lower eyelids. Some people wonder if the reason David Icke and others refer to Jews as reptilians is because some Jews have a large lower eyelid, which reminds people of reptiles. Has anybody actually studied eyelids to see if they differ between races?
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Vaclav_Klaus.jpg
Vaclav Klaus, President of the Czech Republic. Even when his head is tilted downward, his forehead is sloping backwards.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Jim-Murphy.jpg
Jim Murphy, the British minister for Europe, who complains (http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/newsroom/latest-news/?view=Speech&id=4142950) about anti-Semitism.
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:07 PM
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Ian-A-Worthington.jpg
Ian A. Worthington, British Ambassador in Santo Domingo
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Bob-Dewar.jpg
Bob Dewar, The British High Commissioner to Nigeria
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Robert-Zoellick.jpg
Robert Zoellick replaced Paul Wolfowitz as president of the World Bank
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Rahm-Emanuel.jpg
Rahm Emanuel, the congressman from Illinois, has only a slightly sloping forehead and brow ridge, but don't let that fool you; Christopher Bollyn shows that he is the son of a terrorist (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/Bollyn-Emanuel.html), a Zionist terrorist.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Neil-M-Cohen.jpg
Neil Cohen (http://www.wpix.com/landing/?NJ-Politician-Fesses-Up-To-Watching-Chil=1&blockID=235816&feedID=1404), a New Jersey government official who fought child pornography, is now accused of having it himself. As I've explained in several documents and audio files, the best way to get away with crimes is to be a crime fighter:
• Pedophile trick (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Pedophile-trick.html)
• Don't trust crime fighters (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/by_Hufschmid11Oct2005.htm)
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Mike-Reagan.jpg
Michael Reagan (http://www.reagan.com/), a radio host, was adopted by Ronald Reagan while he was married to Jane Wyman. A couple years later, they got divorced and Reagan started a new family. Wyman married a man named Fred Karger, who spent much more time as Michael's father. However, Michael refers to himself as the son of President Reagan, not the son of Wyman or Karger. I mentioned Mike Reagan here (http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Hufschmid-2July2008.html#Michael_Reagan) when I complained about orphans.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Dalai-Lama.jpg
The "Dalai Lama" is to the Tibetan people what the "Pope" is to be Catholics.
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Bill-Nye.jpg
Bill Nye (http://www.nyelabs.com/index.asp) "the Science Guy", one of Cornell University's notable people (http://www.cornell.edu/tours/tidbit_template7876.html), and a television host. He had a strange (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/12/04/earlyshow/leisure/celebspot/main3572152.shtml) marriage and divorce
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Bertie-Ahern.jpg
Patrick Ahern, an Irish politician
http://hugequestions.com/Eric/Neanderthals/Alex-Salmond.jpg
Alex Salmond, the First Minister of Scotland
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:13 PM
Neanderthals may have been wiped out due to INTERBREEDING and not because of a lack of intelligence
Two researchers have suggested that Neanderthals never went extinct
Instead, they say they vanished because they mated with early humans
They also say Neanderthals were not as dumb as we believed them to be
Their lack of intelligence is often cited as the reason they disappeared
They thrived in Eurasia for 300,000 years but vanished 40,000 years ago
By Jonathan O'Callaghan (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=&authornamef=Jonathan+O%27Callaghan)
Published: 21:22 GMT, 29 April 2014 | Updated: 21:22 GMT, 29 April 2014
213
View comments
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2616071/Neanderthals-wiped-INTERBREEDING-not-lack-intelligence.html#comments)
They are often depicted as dim-witted evolutionary losers, but Neanderthals were not driven to extinction by their lack of brains, a new study suggests.
Instead, it is more likely that they disappeared 40,000 years ago because of interbreeding and assimilation with our early modern human ancestors, scientists believe.
An analysis of archaeological evidence dating back 200,000 years strips away some of the myths surrounding Neanderthals and reveals they were more advanced and sophisticated than has widely been thought.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/29/article-2616071-1D73F1B500000578-889_634x423.jpg
+2
Why did Neanderthals go extinct? It's often thought their lack of intelligent ultimately led to their demise, but new research suggests it may instead have been due to interbreeding and assimilation with our early modern human ancestors
The differences between the two human sub-species are not enough on their own to account for the demise of the Neanderthals, say the two US and Dutch researchers.
Dr Paola Villa, from the University of Colorado Museum, and Professor Wil Roebroeks, from Leiden University, wrote in the online journal Public Library of Science ONE: 'Genetic studies now suggest that the debate on the demise of the Neanderthals needs to be reframed in terms of some degree of interbreeding.
'In that sense, Neanderthals did not go extinct, even though their distinctive morphology did disappear.
'We conclude that all the "archaeology-based" explanations for the demise of the Neanderthals... are flawed.'
Neanderthals thrived in Eurasia for 300,000 years but vanished around 40,000 years ago as early modern humans began to settle in Europe.
In the past, experts have theorised that Neanderthals died out because they were mentally, technologically and culturally inferior to the newcomers and unable to compete for limited resources.
But more recent evidence has shown that Neanderthals made effective tools and weapons, wore ornaments such as eagle claws, used ochre and pitch, ate plants and fish as well as big game and created organised living spaces in their caves.
In many cases this was happening before the arrival of modern humans, so the behaviours could not have been copied from them.
Reviewing the evidence, the scientists pointed out that 200,000 years ago Neanderthals were using fire to produce pitch from tree bark.
Experiments showed that the process required high temperatures and an oxygen-free environment such as an enclosed pot, suggesting a high level of technical knowledge.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/04/29/article-2616071-1D73F1C100000578-993_634x644.jpg
+2
Evidence of the Neanderthals and early humans mixing can be seen in the fossil record. Some human-like characteristics have been found in late Neanderthal fossils, and conversely, Neanderthal features have been seen in early specimens of modern humans in Europe
Neanderthal DNA, which was sequenced in 2010, shows clear evidence of interbreeding, the researchers add. Neanderthals and early modern humans are most likely to have interbred in Europe and the Middle East around 50,000 years ago.
Today Neanderthal inheritance is estimated to make up between 1% and 4% of the DNA of people outside Africa.
Interbreeding could be one reason why Neanderthals vanished, according to the scientists. They were not so much driven to extinction as assimilated.
Evidence of the two mixing can be seen in the fossil record. Some human-like characteristics have been found in late Neanderthal fossils, and conversely, Neanderthal features have been seen in early specimens of modern humans in Europe.
Neanderthals were more robust and much stronger than modern humans, with a backward sloping chin and forehead.
It is possible that interbreeding with Neanderthals may have helped our ancestors survive outside Africa, say the scientists. On the other hand some Neanderthal genes may have contributed to sterility, which is why so few remain.
The researchers wrote: 'The Neanderthal demise appears to have resulted from a complex and protracted process including multiple dynamic factors such as low population density, interbreeding with some cultural contact, possible male hybrid sterility and contraction in geographic distribution followed by genetic swamping and assimilation by the increasing numbers of modern immigrants.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2616071/Neanderthals-wiped-INTERBREEDING-not-lack-intelligence.html#ixzz4A0UkhEpx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=MailOnline) | DailyMail on Facebook (http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=bBOTTqvd0r3Pooab7jrHcU&u=DailyMail)
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:19 PM
A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages
Marta D. Costa (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-1), Joana B. Pereira (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-2),Maria Pala (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-3),Verónica Fernandes (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-4),Anna Olivieri (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-5),Alessandro Achilli (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-6),Ugo A. Perego (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-7),Sergei Rychkov (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-8),Oksana Naumova (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-9),Jiři Hatina (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-10),Scott R. Woodward (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-11),Ken Khong Eng (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-12),Vincent Macaulay (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-13),Martin Carr (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-14),Pedro Soares (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-15),Luísa Pereira (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-16)& Martin B. Richards (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#auth-17)
AffiliationsContributionsCorresponding author (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#corres-auth)
Nature Communications 4,Article number:2543doi:10.1038/ncomms3543 Received 11 July 2013 Accepted 04 September 2013 Published 08 October 2013 Article tools
PDF
Citation (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/ris/ncomms3543.ris)
Reprints (https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=NPGR&publication=Nature+Communications&title=A+substantial+prehistoric+European+ancestry+ amongst+Ashkenazi+maternal+lineages&contentID=10.1038%2Fncomms3543&volumeNum=4&issueNum=&numPages=&pageNumbers=pp%24%7BnPage.startPage%7D&orderBeanReset=true&publicationDate=2013-10-08&author=Marta+D.+Costa%2C+Joana+B.+Pereira%2C+Maria +Pala%2C+Ver%C3%B3nica+Fernandes%2C+Anna+Olivieri% 2C+Alessandro+Achilli)
Rights & permissions (https://s100.copyright.com/AppDispatchServlet?publisherName=NPG&publication=Nature+Communications&title=A+substantial+prehistoric+European+ancestry+ amongst+Ashkenazi+maternal+lineages&contentID=10.1038%2Fncomms3543&volumeNum=4&issueNum=&numPages=&pageNumbers=pp%24%7BnPage.startPage%7D&publicationDate=2013-10-08&cc=by&author=Marta+D.+Costa%2C+Joana+B.+Pereira%2C+Maria +Pala%2C+Ver%C3%B3nica+Fernandes%2C+Anna+Olivieri% 2C+Alessandro+Achilli)
Article metrics (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/metrics)
Abstract
Abstract•
Introduction (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#introduction)•
Results (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#results)•
Discussion (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#discussion)•
Methods (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#methods)•
Additional information (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#additional-information)•
Accession codes (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#accessions)•
References (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#references)•
Acknowledgements (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#acknowledgments)•
Author information (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#author-information)•
Supplementary information (http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html#supplementary-information)
The origins of Ashkenazi Jews remain highly controversial. Like Judaism, mitochondrial DNA is passed along the maternal line. Its variation in the Ashkenazim is highly distinctive, with four major and numerous minor founders. However, due to their rarity in the general population, these founders have been difficult to trace to a source. Here we show that all four major founders, ~40% of Ashkenazi mtDNA variation, have ancestry in prehistoric Europe, rather than the Near East or Caucasus. Furthermore, most of the remaining minor founders share a similar deep European ancestry. Thus the great majority of Ashkenazi maternal lineages were not brought from the Levant, as commonly supposed, nor recruited in the Caucasus, as sometimes suggested, but assimilated within Europe. These results point to a significant role for the conversion of women in the formation of Ashkenazi communities, and provide the foundation for a detailed reconstruction of Ashkenazi genealogical history.
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html
Ponce
28th May 2016, 08:33 PM
Hahahahahahahahahaa, you guys are funny........ with a 10th grade education my IQ is of 123...... are the Cubans getting ready to take over the world?........lol, what make the Jews (Zionist?) smart is that they work as a ant hill where everyone helps everyone as one, 100 heads think better than one head alone......... read and learn what THEY don't teach you for they only teach you what they know....like, black is black because that's the name that you were tough it was and a "black board" many times is only a chalk board that's green.
V
midnight rambler
28th May 2016, 08:41 PM
Hello, I am new to this forum. I've always been puzzled by the high IQ levels of Ashkenazi Jews. Their IQ is 110-120, while all the other races are below 105. How did it get that way? Was it through eugenics or sheer luck? Their intelligence along with their tribalism certainly has propelled them to get to the top.
They get supernatural help from their father Lucifer.
vacuum
28th May 2016, 08:51 PM
The only place on earth where people have 0% neanderthal dna is in Africa.
Cebu_4_2
28th May 2016, 09:46 PM
Most those pics depict Jews... so we all know Jews also take prehistoric features.. what is the point?
Santa
28th May 2016, 10:59 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yuq1gu2CEm8
Neuro
29th May 2016, 12:00 AM
Neanderthals Were Too Smart to Survive
This gives us an important clue to why Neanderthals failed in the competition with Homo Sapiens. One of the most important means by which innovations are preserved and transmitted is language. Neanderthals had language themselves. This was proven in 1983 when a Neanderthal hyoid bone was found at the Kebara Cave in Israel. The hyoid is a small bone that holds the root of the tongue in place, a requirement to human speech and, therefore, its presence seems to imply some ability to speak. Recent studies found that due to the physical characteristics of Neanderthals' hyoid and the fact that their larynx was stouter than that of modern man, the average note emitted by Neanderthals were high pitched and sharper than that of modern man. This contradicts the stereotype of Neanderthals having ape-like grunts. However, the base of the Neanderthal tongue was positioned higher in the throat, crowding the mouth somewhat. As a result, Neanderthal speech would most likely have been slow-paced and nasalized.
Ever heard the term whiny Jew? The anatomy of the throat is different, that is the reason, and the anatomy is genetically coded partially Neanderthal... They didn't go extinct. They control the world!
Neuro
29th May 2016, 12:13 AM
When will Kissinger go extinct?
http://217.218.67.233/photo/20150821/e0d96749-33b8-43fd-b144-ea960e9fea86.jpg
Shami-Amourae
29th May 2016, 12:39 AM
Start @6:05
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFA5n93DlP4
Jews don't win since they are intelligent. It's because they have extreme tenacity (they don't give up), and they work together/network another very well.
Neuro
29th May 2016, 12:39 AM
Slanting forehead, brow ridge, short neck, massive body, extreme competitiveness...
http://www.commondreams.org/sites/default/files/styles/cd_large/public/views-article/trump_hair_getty.jpg?itok=lmQ8refg
midnight rambler
29th May 2016, 02:37 AM
When will Kissinger go extinct?
http://217.218.67.233/photo/20150821/e0d96749-33b8-43fd-b144-ea960e9fea86.jpg
Now there's a very good example of supernatural intervention by Lucifer.
Make the world lighter Dr. K, die already.
Shami-Amourae
29th May 2016, 04:36 AM
>Average IQ of Israelis is 94
>Ashkenazi Jews (a subset of all Jews) score 112 on average
>When taken as a whole, the average drops to 103
>"Whites" are never broken into subsets and scored this way
>Asians are never broken into subsets and scored this way
>Blacks are never broken down, despite differences
>Christians are never compared to Buddhists
>Catholics are never compared to Protestants
If Jews are "just a religion" and not a race, why do they study the IQs of each Jewish sub-group seperately? When you average a smaller group, you can get higher numbers. Does Jewish dominance of Universities produce pro-Jewish propaganda, just like Leftist dominance of universities does?
https://archive.is/8BqxX
PatColo
29th May 2016, 05:01 AM
The Jews put out the IQ test.
Also accounts for why dinjooz are over represented in nobel prizes, and ivy league uni admissions-- mostly political & ethno-nepotism decisions... their actual merit is dwarfed by their political power, which itself was accumulated mostly the same way!
But they preach to the goy that such biased machinations are wrong & evil. ;(
palani
29th May 2016, 05:03 AM
intelligence (n.)
late 14c., "the highest faculty of the mind, capacity for comprehending general truths;" c. 1400, "faculty of understanding, comprehension," from Old French intelligence (12c.) and directly from Latin intelligentia, intellegentia "understanding, knowledge, power of discerning; art, skill, taste," from intelligentem (nominative intelligens) "discerning, appreciative," present participle of intelligere "to understand, comprehend, come to know," from inter- "between" (see inter-) + legere "choose, pick out, read" (see lecture (n.)).
Meaning "superior understanding, sagacity, quality of being intelligent" is from early 15c. Sense of "information received or imparted, news" first recorded mid-15c., especially "secret information from spies" (1580s). Meaning "a being endowed with understanding or intelligence" is late 14c. Intelligence quotient first recorded 1921 (see I.Q.).
I.Q.
1922, abbreviation of intelligence quotient, a 1921 translation of German Intelligenz-quotient, coined 1912 by German psychologist William L. Stern (1871-1938).
Intelligence is a general capacity of an individual consciously to adjust his thinking to new requirements: it is general mental adaptability to new problems and conditions of life. [Stern, "The Psychological Methods of Testing Intelligence," 1914]
Earlier, i.q. was an abbreviation of Latin idem quod "the same as."
quotient (n.)
"number of times one quantity is contained in another," mid-15c., from Latin quotiens "how often? how many times?; as often as," pronominal adverb of time, from quot "how many?" (see quote (v.)). The Latin adverb quotiens was mistaken in Middle English for a present participle in -ens.
Does it not seem odd that the measure of your capacity to adjust your thinking consists of a test based upon things learned in a classroom?
Did you ever wonder why I.Q. is given in Arabic numbers? Ponces' I.Q. in the Arabic system is 123. In the Roman system it is CXXIII. See the difference?
Then too in the Roman system I.Q. is idem quod ... the same as. Now isn't that interesting?
aeondaze
29th May 2016, 05:15 AM
This thread is EVERYTHING I love about GSUS. :rolleyes:
Migration back to Africa took place during the Paleolithic (http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/spring-2016/article/migration-back-to-africa-took-place-during-the-paleolithic)
Shami-Amourae
29th May 2016, 07:40 AM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1454/89/1454898485379.png
Shami-Amourae
29th May 2016, 07:42 AM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1461/20/1461208854368.jpg
Shami-Amourae
29th May 2016, 07:44 AM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1464/52/1464528942937.png
hoarder
29th May 2016, 02:56 PM
Much is revealed in what Jews project on others. Jews are the Master Race and they attained that rank through eugenics.
palani
29th May 2016, 03:10 PM
they attained that rank through eugenics.
chutzpah (n.)
also hutzpah, 1892, from Yiddish khutspe "impudence, gall." from Hebrew hutspah. The classic definition is that given by Leo Rosten: "that quality enshrined in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan."
singular_me
29th May 2016, 04:13 PM
I personally think that the whole **judeo-roman church-muslim** triumvira incarnates the absolute evil and was planned since day 1
vacuum
31st July 2016, 10:27 PM
Interesting, it appears that nose jobs + chin extensions are commonly associated with each other.
http://www.drsimoni.com/nosejob-chin-implant-men.htm
Nose Job with Chin Implant for Men Nose job and chin implant (http://www.drsimoni.com/chin-implant-beverly-hills.htm) has become very popular in men for its ability to change the shape and contour of the nose which, for many men, has been a source of ongoing embarrassment and self-consciousness. For more information visit the rhinoplasty for men (http://www.drsimoni.com/rhinoplasty-for-men.htm) page.
https://i.sli.mg/crWA3s.jpg
Problems addressed:
poor nose-lip angle
Over-projected tip
nose hump
Weak chin
Thick skin
Procedure:Primary open Rhinoplasty
Chin Implant
About Payman Simoni, MDPayman Simoni, M.D. received his undergraduate degree from Yeshiva University and his M.D. degree from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. He then served as general surgical resident at University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital where he completed his Facial Plastic Surgery and Head & Neck surgery training. Dr Simoni has two board certifications in Facial Plastic Surgery by the American Board of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive surgery (www.abfprs.org) and the American Board of Head and Neck Surgery/Otolaryngology.
hoarder
31st July 2016, 10:29 PM
A convex facial profile looks Jewish. A straighter profile looks goyish.
vacuum
31st July 2016, 11:10 PM
A convex facial profile looks Jewish. A straighter profile looks goyish.
Check out the pictures of facial profiles I posted on page 2 of this thread. Spread across multiple posts.
Neuro
1st August 2016, 02:08 AM
A convex facial profile looks Jewish. A straighter profile looks goyish.
The Semitic-Neanderthal look! Middle East, where Cro Magnon and Neanderthal co-habited for 50-100,000 years...
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRJaEdFTaMM9DS3GYpmFNRGRP1UwFVE3 YIJ9etX0auDnjcnV3ZWUw
Cebu_4_2
1st August 2016, 03:51 AM
The Semitic-Neanderthal look! Middle East, where Cro Magnon and Neanderthal co-habited for 50-100,000 years...
https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRJaEdFTaMM9DS3GYpmFNRGRP1UwFVE3 YIJ9etX0auDnjcnV3ZWUw
Possibly but not in the same cave structure.
Neuro
1st August 2016, 04:58 AM
Possibly but not in the same cave structure.
Obviously some entered each others caves! Shalom!
Alex Drone
2nd August 2016, 04:30 PM
Another intelligence-enhancing process occurred with the Jews. In Biblical times they were often the losers in tribal battles for territory, forcing them to migrate constantly, which selected for verbal skills. Later prohibitions against farming, but not commerce and finance, continued the selection for verbal and mathematical intelligence, as did other factors. See (“Jewish Genius,” by Charles Murray, Commentary, Apr., 2007). The Jews are not unique, however, and any population will increase its intelligence if selection for it is strong, though it may require thousands of years.
http://erectuswalksamongst.us/SecIV.html
ximmy
2nd August 2016, 04:37 PM
Another intelligence-enhancing process occurred with the Jews. In Biblical times they were often the losers in tribal battles for territory, forcing them to migrate constantly, which selected for verbal skills. Later prohibitions against farming, but not commerce and finance, continued the selection for verbal and mathematical intelligence, as did other factors. See (“Jewish Genius,” by Charles Murray, Commentary, Apr., 2007). The Jews are not unique, however, and any population will increase its intelligence if selection for it is strong, though it may require thousands of years.
http://erectuswalksamongst.us/SecIV.html
Alex, please see this post:
http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?84226-White-people-have-many-things-to-be-ashamed-about-List-below
White races dominate the planet with their inventions and accomplishments,
In the 2003 book Human Accomplishment (http://www.amazon.com/Human-Accomplishment-Pursuit-Excellence-Sciences/dp/006019247X/): The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950, the American political scientist Charles Murray attempts to quantify the accomplishments of individuals worldwide in arts and sciences by calculating and ranking the space allocated to them in important reference works.
Murray finds (http://www.amconmag.com/article/2003/nov/17/00024/) that almost all important scientific and technological advances in the modern world until the mid-twentieth century were made by Europeans or their descendants overseas. The most prominent city figuring in the lists of achievers is Paris. France is tied with Britain and Germany as the leading nations in producing major figures in the arts and sciences, with Italy fourth and other European nations such as Austria, Russia, the Netherlands, Belgium, the Scandinavian countries, Switzerland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Spain or Ireland trailing behind.
http://www.unz.com/akarlin/human-accomplishment-goes-public/
hoarder
2nd August 2016, 05:26 PM
It all depends on how you define accomplishment. Whites have accomplished a lot in the way of inventions in the last 300 years, but historically, human accomplishment was measured by conquest in most cultures.
What good does it do to invent something when Jews pry the patent from your fingers and have the Chinese make it cheap and then sell it to you at a high price?
ximmy
2nd August 2016, 05:34 PM
It all depends on how you define accomplishment. Whites have accomplished a lot in the way of inventions in the last 300 years, but historically, human accomplishment was measured by conquest in most cultures.
What good does it do to invent something when Jews pry the patent from your fingers and have the Chinese make it cheap and then sell it to you at a high price?
The answer is separation of the races.. Closed borders, nationalism.... then you will see who wins. European-Americans invent and prosper, no joo to steal the idea, no chinese to copy and resell.
hoarder
2nd August 2016, 09:03 PM
The answer is separation of the races.. Closed borders, nationalism.... then you will see who wins. European-Americans invent and prosper, no joo to steal the idea, no chinese to copy and resell.Wins what? If there is a competition between the races, borders have to be open. If the races are isolated, each one will say they won, which is perfectly OK with me.
Cebu_4_2
2nd August 2016, 11:48 PM
I am perfectly fine with isolationist borders.
Cebu_4_2
3rd August 2016, 12:07 AM
Slanting forehead, brow ridge, short neck, massive body, extreme competitiveness...
http://www.commondreams.org/sites/default/files/styles/cd_large/public/views-article/trump_hair_getty.jpg?itok=lmQ8refg
Id still vote for him. Jews will take out other jews to win even if it was their own family. This guy is huge, lets watch him take others out.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.