mick silver
4th June 2016, 02:29 PM
Rat Ryan Endorses The Leader Out of Fear, Immediately Attacks Him to Defend Terrorist Spic Judge .........Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 3, 2016
After his back was introduced to the wall, the stinking weasel and ISIS-supporter Paul Ryan, fearing for his career, has finally endorsed Glorious Leader.
CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/02/politics/paul-ryan-endorses-donald-trump/):
House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday said he’s voting for presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump.
In an op-ed for the Janesville Gazette of Janesville, Wisconsin, Ryan — who sparked a political firestorm last month when he told CNN’s Jake Tapper he was “just not ready” to back his party’s nominee — says he is now convinced Trump will advance the Republican agenda.
“I feel confident he would help us turn the ideas in this agenda into laws to help improve people’s lives. That’s why I’ll be voting for him this fall,” Ryan wrote.
He added, “It’s no secret that he and I have our differences. I won’t pretend otherwise. And when I feel the need to, I’ll continue to speak my mind. But the reality is, on the issues that make up our agenda, we have more common ground than disagreement.”
Late Thursday afternoon, Trump tweeted his appreciation for Ryan’s support.
“So great to have the endorsement and support of Paul Ryan. We will both be working very hard to Make America Great Again!” Trump said.
Less than 24 hours after the forced-endorsement however, the ISIS-backer Ryan attacked The Leader, coming to the defense of a terrorist spic judge.
Washington Examiner (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/paul-ryan-i-completely-disagree-with-trumps-attack-on-mexican-judges-heritage/article/2592946):
Less than 24 hours after endorsing Donald Trump, House Speaker Paul Ryan has returned to criticizing him. This time, Ryan “completely” disagrees with the presumptive Republican presidential nominee’s comments about the judge handling a fraud case against him.
“Look, the comment about the judge the other day just was out of left field for my mind,” the Wisconsin Republican told WISN radio Friday afternoon. “It’s reasoning I don’t relate to.”
Trump told the Wall Street Journal Thursday that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict of interest” and should recuse himself from the case against Trump University because he’s “Mexican.”
“I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Trump said in an interview.
“I completely disagree with the thinking behind that,” Ryan argued on Friday.
The House speaker, who declined to endorse Trump for months before claiming Thursday that “good conversations” with the billionaire led to his support, said Trump “clearly says and does things” he disagrees with that he’s “had to speak up from time to time when that has occurred.”
“And I’ll continue to do that if it’s necessary,” Ryan added. “I hope it’s not.”
Trump’s comments about Curiel have attracted criticism from a handful of Republican lawmakers and his very own surrogates.
CNN contributor Kayleigh McEnany, a Trump loyalist, said the candidate’s remark about Curiel’s heritage was “off-base” and does nothing to help him win much-needed minority voters in the general election.
Even though Ryan endorsed, I am still 100% against him, and will endorse any candidate that runs against him.
This is a guy we just simply don’t need around.
Daily Stormer
June 3, 2016
After his back was introduced to the wall, the stinking weasel and ISIS-supporter Paul Ryan, fearing for his career, has finally endorsed Glorious Leader.
CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/02/politics/paul-ryan-endorses-donald-trump/):
House Speaker Paul Ryan on Thursday said he’s voting for presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump.
In an op-ed for the Janesville Gazette of Janesville, Wisconsin, Ryan — who sparked a political firestorm last month when he told CNN’s Jake Tapper he was “just not ready” to back his party’s nominee — says he is now convinced Trump will advance the Republican agenda.
“I feel confident he would help us turn the ideas in this agenda into laws to help improve people’s lives. That’s why I’ll be voting for him this fall,” Ryan wrote.
He added, “It’s no secret that he and I have our differences. I won’t pretend otherwise. And when I feel the need to, I’ll continue to speak my mind. But the reality is, on the issues that make up our agenda, we have more common ground than disagreement.”
Late Thursday afternoon, Trump tweeted his appreciation for Ryan’s support.
“So great to have the endorsement and support of Paul Ryan. We will both be working very hard to Make America Great Again!” Trump said.
Less than 24 hours after the forced-endorsement however, the ISIS-backer Ryan attacked The Leader, coming to the defense of a terrorist spic judge.
Washington Examiner (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/paul-ryan-i-completely-disagree-with-trumps-attack-on-mexican-judges-heritage/article/2592946):
Less than 24 hours after endorsing Donald Trump, House Speaker Paul Ryan has returned to criticizing him. This time, Ryan “completely” disagrees with the presumptive Republican presidential nominee’s comments about the judge handling a fraud case against him.
“Look, the comment about the judge the other day just was out of left field for my mind,” the Wisconsin Republican told WISN radio Friday afternoon. “It’s reasoning I don’t relate to.”
Trump told the Wall Street Journal Thursday that U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict of interest” and should recuse himself from the case against Trump University because he’s “Mexican.”
“I’m building a wall. It’s an inherent conflict of interest,” Trump said in an interview.
“I completely disagree with the thinking behind that,” Ryan argued on Friday.
The House speaker, who declined to endorse Trump for months before claiming Thursday that “good conversations” with the billionaire led to his support, said Trump “clearly says and does things” he disagrees with that he’s “had to speak up from time to time when that has occurred.”
“And I’ll continue to do that if it’s necessary,” Ryan added. “I hope it’s not.”
Trump’s comments about Curiel have attracted criticism from a handful of Republican lawmakers and his very own surrogates.
CNN contributor Kayleigh McEnany, a Trump loyalist, said the candidate’s remark about Curiel’s heritage was “off-base” and does nothing to help him win much-needed minority voters in the general election.
Even though Ryan endorsed, I am still 100% against him, and will endorse any candidate that runs against him.
This is a guy we just simply don’t need around.