PDA

View Full Version : Hitler Was Financed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England



mick silver
12th June 2016, 05:28 PM
Hitler Was Financed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England By Ian Greenhalgh (http://www.veteranstoday.com/author/iangreenhalgh/) on June 11, 2016 Slowly the myths of Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler and World War Two are being broken down and the real history of the 20th century is gradually being established
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/114313_800.jpg (http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/114313_800.jpg)
This article by Yuri Rubtsov was originally published in 2009 at ru-polit.livejournal. It was translated by Ollie Richardson for Fort Russ on 14th May, 2016
It is a truly excellent piece of writing and does a great job of drawing back the curtain to expose the truth behind Hitler’s rise to power and the creation of Nazi Germany. They were both the result of financing from Wall Street and the assistance of US big business. The history books printed in the West are all deeply wrong, and deliberately so I might add, about the rise of Hitler and the Nazis; there are great secrets to be kept hidden and many of them would have deep repercussions in the modern world, should they become widely known. Furthermore, if people were to learn how the tricks of the past had been pulled off, then they would be much harder to fool today; therefore this article is imbued with much relevance to today’s world where the same old trick of creating a dictator in order to profit from later crushing them has been repeated many times – Saddam, Gadaffi, they were all called ‘the new Hitler’ at some point, marking them out for death; same old tricks, just different names and faces.

__________Hitler Was Financed by the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England (http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/05/hitler-was-financed-by-federal-reserve.html)More than 70 years ago was the start of the greatest slaughter in history.
The recent resolution of the parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE fully equalizes the role of the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany at the outbreak of the Second World War, except that it had the purely pragmatic purpose of extorting money from Russia on the contents of some of the bankrupt economies, intended to demonize Russia as the successor state to the USSR, and to prepare the legal ground for the deprivation of her right to speak out against revision of results of war.
But if we approach the problem of responsibility for the war, then you first need to answer the key question: who helped the Nazis come to power? Who sent them on their way to world catastrophe? The entire pre-war history of Germany shows that the provision of the “necessary” policies were managed by the financial turmoil, in which, by the way, the world was plunged into.
The key structures that defined the post-war development strategy of the West were the Central financial institutions of Great Britain and the United States — the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve System (FRS) — and the associated financial and industrial organizations set out a target to establish absolute control over the financial system of Germany to control political processes in Central Europe. To implement this strategy it is possible to allocate the following stages:
1st: from 1919 to 1924 — to prepare the ground for massive American financial investment in the German economy;
2nd: from 1924 to 1929 — the establishment of control over the financial system of Germany and financial support for national socialism;
3rd: from 1929 to 1933 — provoking and unleashing a deep financial and economic crisis and ensuring the Nazis come to power;
4th: from 1933 to 1939 — financial cooperation with the Nazi government and support for its expansionist foreign policy, aimed at preparing and unleashing a new World War.
In the first stage, the main levers to ensure the penetration of American capital into Europe began with war debts and the closely related problem of German reparations. After the US’ formal entry into the first World War, they gave the allies (primarily England and France) loans to the amount of $8.8 billion. The total sum of war debts, including loans granted to the United States in 1919-1921, was more than $11 billion.
To solve this problem, debtor countries tried to impose a huge amount of extremely difficult conditions for the payment of reparations at the expense of Germany. This was caused by the flight of German capital abroad, and the refusal to pay taxes led to a state budget deficit that could be covered only through mass production of unsecured Marks. The result was the collapse of the German currency — the “great inflation” of 1923, which amounted to 578 (512%), when the dollar was worth 4.2 trillion Marks. German Industrialists began to openly sabotage all activities in the payment of reparation obligations, which eventually caused the famous “Ruhr crisis” — Franco-Belgian occupation of the Ruhr in January 1923.
The Anglo-American ruling circles, in order to take the initiative in their own hands, waited for France to get caught up in a venturing adventure and to prove its inability to solve the problem. US Secretary of State Hughes pointed out: “It is necessary to wait for Europe to mature in order to accept the American proposal.”
The new project was developed in the depths of “JP Morgan & Co.” under the instruction of the head of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman. At the core of his ideas was representative of the “Dresdner Bank” Hjalmar Schacht, who formulated it in March 1922 at the suggestion of John Foster Dulles (future Secretary of state in the Cabinet of President Eisenhower) and legal adviser to President W. Wilson at the Paris peace conference. Dulles gave this note to the chief Trustee “JP Morgan & Co.”, and then JP Morgan recommended that H. Schacht, M. Norman, and the last of the Weimar rulers. In December, 1923, H. Schacht would become Manager of the Reichsbank and was instrumental in bringing together the Anglo-American and German financial circles.
In the summer of 1924, the project known as the “Dawes plan” (named after the Chairman of the Committee of experts who created it – American banker and Director of one of the banks of the Morgan group), was adopted at the London conference. He called for halving the reparations and solved the question about the sources of their coverage. However, the main task was to ensure favorable conditions for US investment, which was only possible with stabilization of the German Mark.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/114574_800.jpg (http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/114574_800.jpg)
To this end, the plan gave Germany a large loan of $200 million, half of which was accounted for by JP Morgan. While the Anglo-American banks gained control not only over the transfer of German payments, but also for the budget, the system of monetary circulation and to a large extent the credit system of the country. By August 1924, the old German Mark was replaced by a new, stabilized financial situation in Germany, and, as the researcher G.D Preparta wrote, the Weimar Republic was prepared for “the most picturesque economic aid in history, followed by the most bitter harvest in world history” — “an unstoppable flood of American blood poured into the financial veins of Germany.”
The consequences of this were not slow to appear.
This was primarily due to the fact that the annual reparations were to cover the amount of debt paid by the allies, formed by the so-called “absurd Weimar circle”. The gold that Germany paid in the form of war reparations, was sold, pawned, and disappeared in the US, where it was returned to Germany in the form of an “aid” plan, who gave it to England and France, and they in turn were to pay the war debt of the United States. It was then overlayed with interest, and again sent to Germany. In the end, all in Germany lived in debt, and it was clear that should Wall Street withdraw their loans, the country will suffer complete bankruptcy.
Secondly, although formal credit was issued to secure payment, it was actually the restoration of the military-industrial potential of the country. The fact is that the Germans were paid in shares of companies for the loans so that American capital began to actively integrate into the German economy.
The total amount of foreign investments in German industry during 1924-1929 amounted to almost 63 billion gold Marks (30 billion was accounted for by loans), and the payment of reparations — 10 billion Marks. 70% of revenues were provided by bankers from the United States, and most of the banks were from JP Morgan. As a result, in 1929, German industry was in second place in the world, but it was largely in the hands of America’s leading financial-industrial groups.
“Interessen-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie”, the main supplier of the German war machine, financed 45% of the election campaign of Hitler in 1930, and was under the control of Rockefeller “Standard oil”. Morgan, through “General Electric”, controlled the German radio and electrical industry via AEG and Siemens (up to 1933, 30% of the shares of AEG owned “General Electric”) through the Telecom company ITT — 40% of the telephone network in Germany.
In addition, they owned a 30% stake in the aircraft manufacturing company “Focke-Wulf”. “General Motors”, belonging to the DuPont family, established control over “Opel”. Henry Ford controlled 100% of the shares of “Volkswagen”. In 1926, with the participation of the Rockefeller Bank “Dillon, Reed & Co.” the second largest industrial monopoly in Germany after “I.G Farben” emerged — metallurgical concern “Vereinigte Stahlwerke” (Steel trust) Thyssen, Flick, Wolff, Feglera etc.
American cooperation with the German military-industrial complex was so intense and pervasive that by 1933 the key sectors of German industry and large banks such as Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank, Donat Bank etc were under the control of American financial capital.
The political force that was intended to play a crucial role in the Anglo-American plans was being simultaneously prepared. We are talking about the funding of the Nazi party and A. Hitler personally.
As former German Chancellor Brüning wrote in his memoirs, since 1923, Hitler received large sums from abroad. Where they went is unknown, but they were received through Swiss and Swedish banks. It is also known that, in 1922 in Munich, a meeting took place between A. Hitler and the military attache of the US to Germany – Captain Truman Smith – who compiled a detailed report for his Washington superiors (in the office of military intelligence), in which he spoke highly of Hitler.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/114714_800.jpg (http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/114714_800.jpg)
It was through Smith’s circle of acquaintances Hitler was first introduced to Ernst Franz Sedgwick Hanfstaengl (Putzie), a graduate of Harvard University who played an important role in the formation of A. Hitler as a politician, rendered him significant financial support, and secured him the acquaintance and communication with senior British figures.
Hitler was prepared in politics, however, while Germany reigned in prosperity, his party remained on the periphery of public life. The situation changed dramatically with the beginning of the crisis.
Since the autumn of 1929 after the collapse of the American stock exchange was triggered by the Federal Reserve, the third stage of the strategy of Anglo-American financial circles started.
The Federal Reserve and JP Morgan decided to stop lending to Germany, inspired by the banking crisis and economic depression in Central Europe. In September 1931, England abandoned the gold standard, deliberately destroying the international system of payments and completely cutting off the financial oxygen to the Weimar Republic.
But a financial miracle occurred with the Nazi party: in September 1930, as a result of large donations from Thyssen, “I.G. Farben”, Kirdorf’s party got 6.4 million votes, and took second place in the Reichstag, after which generous investments from abroad were activated. The main link between the major German industrialists and foreign financiers became H. Schacht.
On January 4th, 1932, a meeting was held between the largest English financier M. Norman, A. Hitler, and von Papen, which concluded a secret agreement on the financing of the NSDAP. This meeting was also attended by US policymakers and the Dulles brothers, something which their biographers do not like to mention. On January 14th, 1933, a meeting between Hitler, Schroder, Papen and Kepler took place, where Hitler’s program was fully approved. It was here that they finally resolved the issue of the transfer of power to the Nazis, and on 30th January Hitler became Chancellor. The implementation of the fourth stage of the strategy thus begun.
The attitude of the Anglo-American ruling circles to the new government was very sympathetic. When Hitler refused to pay reparations, which, naturally, called into question the payment of war debts, neither Britain nor France showed him the claims of the payments. Moreover, after the visit in the United States in May 1933, H. Schacht was placed again as the head of Reichsbank, and after his meeting with the President and the biggest bankers on Wall Street, America allocated Germany new loans totalling $1 billion.
In June, during a trip to London and a meeting with M. Norman, Schacht also sought an English loan of $2 billion, and a reduction and then cessation of payments on old loans. Thus, the Nazis got what they could not achieve with the previous government.
In the summer of 1934, Britain signed the Anglo-German transfer agreement, which became one of the foundations of British policy towards the Third Reich, and at the end of the 30’s, Germany became the main trading partner of England. Schroeder Bank became the main agent of Germany in the UK, and in 1936 his office in New York teamed up with the Rockefellers to create the “Schroeder, Rockefeller & Co.” investment Bank, which “Times” magazine called the “economic propagandist axis of Berlin-Rome”. As Hitler himself admitted, he conceived his four-year plan on the basis of foreign financial loans, so it never inspired him with the slightest alarm.
In August 1934, American “Standard oil” in Germany acquired 730,000 acres of land and built large oil refineries that supplied the Nazis with oil. At the same time, Germany secretly took delivery of the most modern equipment for aircraft factories from the United States, which would begin the production of German planes.
Germany received a large number of military patents from American firms Pratt and Whitney”, “Douglas”, “Curtis Wright”, and American technology was building the “Junkers-87”. In 1941, when the Second world war was raging, American investments in the economy of Germany amounted to $475 million. “Standard oil” invested – 120 million, “General motors” – $35 million, ITT — $30 million, and “Ford” — $17.5 million.
The close financial and economic cooperation of Anglo-American and Nazi business circles was the background against which, in the 30’s, a policy of appeasement led to world war II.
Today, when the world’s financial elite began to implement the “Great depression — 2” plan, with the subsequent transition to the “new world order”, identifying its key role in the organization of crimes against humanity becomes a priority.
Yuri Rubtsov is a doctor of historical sciences, academician of the Academy of military sciences, and member of the International Association of historians of world war II

mick silver
12th June 2016, 05:28 PM
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/06/11/hitler-was-financed-by-the-federal-reserve-and-the-bank-of-england/

StreetsOfGold
13th June 2016, 06:54 AM
No mention of Jesuits?
The Vatican was the BIGGEST financial supporters!

Then you KNOW what this is? More Jesuit CRAP!

Norweger
13th June 2016, 07:09 AM
Michael Collins Piper Demolishes Kosher Anti-Hitler Myths

http://smoloko.com/?p=9156


Prolific writer and author, Michael Collins Piper, demolished the mindless myths perpetuated about Hitler being an agent of Zionism and “Jewish bankers” in his outstanding book The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme — A Panoramic Overview Of The Historical, Religious And Economic Origins Of The New World Order (pp. 88-90):

“For the moment however, we must make a critical digression, to explore the much-discussed relationship between Nazi Germany and the Zionist movement. This has been the subject of so much misinformation and deliberate disinformation, much of it spread by well-meaning folks who don’t understand the “big picture.”

Bigjon
13th June 2016, 08:21 AM
No mention of Jesuits?
The Vatican was the BIGGEST financial supporters!

Then you KNOW what this is? More Jesuit CRAP!

You keep hollering, but present NO evidence to back up your claim.

all your posts are crap.

Bigjon
13th June 2016, 08:27 AM
Michael Collins Piper Demolishes Kosher Anti-Hitler Myths

http://smoloko.com/?p=9156


Prolific writer and author, Michael Collins Piper, demolished the mindless myths perpetuated about Hitler being an agent of Zionism and “Jewish bankers” in his outstanding book The New Babylon: Those Who Reign Supreme — A Panoramic Overview Of The Historical, Religious And Economic Origins Of The New World Order (pp. 88-90):

“For the moment however, we must make a critical digression, to explore the much-discussed relationship between Nazi Germany and the Zionist movement. This has been the subject of so much misinformation and deliberate disinformation, much of it spread by well-meaning folks who don’t understand the “big picture.”

Keep trying to prop up this Jew Hitler as a true nordik and who does that benefit???

The end result and all of his actions point to double agent, so much so that the true Germans plotted to kill him, but were betrayed.

singular_me
13th June 2016, 01:12 PM
that hitler' supporters are so much in denial about the **end results** is beyond me.

The price tag for mass hypnosis: total obliteration of germany... lots of blonds and blue eyed.

Norweger
13th June 2016, 01:28 PM
Keep trying to prop up this Jew Hitler as a true nordik and who does that benefit???

The end result and all of his actions point to double agent, so much so that the true Germans plotted to kill him, but were betrayed.

The were betrayed because somebody didnt manage to kill him because the bomb was placed slightly off angle?

This Hitler was a jew nonsense is mostly beneficial for jews as it paints them as all powerful beings that there is no point in fighting.

The end result.. it would have been far worse had it not been for Hitler. Even Britain would have had the Soviet Flag swaying over Buckingham palace. The communists planned to use Germany as a springboard in order to spread communism into western Europe. Hitler put a stop to that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icebreaker_(Suvorov)

Norweger
13th June 2016, 01:32 PM
that hitler' supporters are so much in denial about the **end results** is beyond me.

The price tag for mass hypnosis: total obliteration of germany... lots of blonds and blue eyed.

The end results.. Germany is still the most powerful economy in the EU. Whoever controls Germany controls Europe. Hitler knew that and openly stated it. He knew what the war was about and made sure that it was as costly for the enemy as possible, which it was, so much so that the communists had to scrap their plans for further control over Europe.

Germanys victory is Western-Europes freedom from communism.

Jewboo
13th June 2016, 01:46 PM
This Hitler was a jew nonsense is mostly beneficial for jews as it paints them as all powerful beings that there is no point in fighting.



Exactly. That and he "intended" to lose WWII.

:)

singular_me
13th June 2016, 02:21 PM
The end result.. it would have been far worse had it not been for Hitler.

Hitler didnt stop agenda 21 that has been in place well before WW1, did he?

in my view, any valid assessment considers mankind's history as a whole and the progression of the NWO. Hitler comes out as a stooge. Compartmentalizing conflicts is a trap that got us here.

POWER = EVIL

Bigjon
13th June 2016, 03:08 PM
The end results.. Germany is still the most powerful economy in the EU. Whoever controls Germany controls Europe. Hitler knew that and openly stated it. He knew what the war was about and made sure that it was as costly for the enemy as possible, which it was, so much so that the communists had to scrap their plans for further control over Europe.

Germanys victory is Western-Europes freedom from communism.

All powerful my ass, that's not even logical. What they are is very deceptive to the trusting goyim. Once his generals figured out he was on the wrong side, they tried to kill him.

Bigjon
13th June 2016, 03:12 PM
The end results.. Germany is still the most powerful economy in the EU. Whoever controls Germany controls Europe. Hitler knew that and openly stated it. He knew what the war was about and made sure that it was as costly for the enemy as possible, which it was, so much so that the communists had to scrap their plans for further control over Europe.

Germanys victory is Western-Europes freedom from communism.

Germany was owned by Jews and now their power over Germany remains unchallenged and they have branched out to control most of Europe.

Where the hell do you get a German victory... what the hell are you smoking???

hoarder
13th June 2016, 06:24 PM
This Hitler was a jew nonsense is mostly beneficial for jews as it paints them as all powerful beings that there is no point in fighting.How do you arrive at this conclusion? Why would goyim suddenly decide to roll over and die because they discover Jews are good at playing controlled opposition? Playing controlled opposition only makes them powerful as long as the goyim don't understand that strategy. Most people on this forum and most people in general who are Jew-wise know about controlled opposition. Some just have a hard time recognizing when they do it.

World politics is just like a Hollywood movie. Jews write the scripts and provide the actors. The recognition of this reality empowers rather than weakens the goyim.

Jewboo
13th June 2016, 06:53 PM
Most people on this forum and most people in general who are Jew-wise know about controlled opposition. Some just have a hard time recognizing when they do it.



https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/13/57/b6/1357b6ba040063c4d237eb6b88ce142d.jpg https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/13/57/b6/1357b6ba040063c4d237eb6b88ce142d.jpg

After a decade of debate you and Bigjon still cling to the silly Hitler-Was-A-Jew-Who-Intended-To-Lose-WWII nonsense.

Take a sip please. Both of you...

:)

Neuro
13th June 2016, 07:13 PM
How do you arrive at this conclusion? Why would goyim suddenly decide to roll over and die because they discover Jews are good at playing controlled opposition? Playing controlled opposition only makes them powerful as long as the goyim don't understand that strategy. Most people on this forum and most people in general who are Jew-wise know about controlled opposition. Some just have a hard time recognizing when they do it.

World politics is just like a Hollywood movie. Jews write the scripts and provide the actors. The recognition of this reality empowers rather than weakens the goyim.

Ok I'll play. Has there ever been any real opposition in your opinion? Let's say since 1800...

hoarder
13th June 2016, 07:14 PM
That's kool-aid labeled as "coffee" you've been drinking.

woodman
13th June 2016, 07:16 PM
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/13/57/b6/1357b6ba040063c4d237eb6b88ce142d.jpg https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/13/57/b6/1357b6ba040063c4d237eb6b88ce142d.jpg

After a decade of debate you and Bigjon still cling to the silly Hitler-Was-A-Jew-Who-Intended-To-Lose-WWII nonsense.

Take a sip please. Both of you...

:)



Not this shit again. The German people are excellent people, they just happen to be somewhat gullible. The same can be said of those who worship Hitler and believe he was the real deal. I understand the desire to have an idol and someone to respect for their ability, and Hitler was certainly capable.

Because of his actions the German people suffered a horrible fate on a national scale. Who can possibly argue that he wasn't the worst enemy Germany has ever had?

Seriously, just look at the consequences of his actions. Chose your enemies carefully and choose your idols with even more care, lest they lead you to slaughter.

Hitler lived out his days in Argentina. The Jews would never have allowed this unless he was secretly their man and their ace-in-the-hole.

hoarder
13th June 2016, 07:16 PM
Ok I'll play. Has there ever been any real opposition in your opinion? Let's say since 1800...I'm no expert on written history, that being written by Jews of course. You're still grasping for information based arguments.

aeondaze
13th June 2016, 07:18 PM
After a decade of debate you and Bigjon still cling to the silly Hitler-Was-A-Jew-Who-Intended-To-Lose-WWII nonsense.

Honest question, what realities do you base this opinion on. I'm trying to have a meaningful discusion here; not trying to assert the oppposite or counter this, I'm just trying to understand your position, I value your opinion and would like to know how you came to this conclusion?

aeondaze
13th June 2016, 07:20 PM
Ok I'll play. Has there ever been any real opposition in your opinion? Let's say since 1800...


Maybe JFK...?? Other than that I got nothin'

Neuro
13th June 2016, 07:22 PM
I'm no expert on written history, that being written by Jews of course. You're still grasping for information based arguments.

Nope without any examples of real opposition, there really is no point in hope, we are hopelessly enslaved goyim.

Jewboo
13th June 2016, 07:27 PM
Honest question, what realities do you base this opinion on. I'm trying to have a meaningful discusion here; not trying to assert the oppposite or counter this, I'm just trying to understand your position, I value your opinion and would like to know how you came to this conclusion?

Good to see you again Aeondaze. Well...as I said...we have been debating this since the GIM1 days...a decade...and never seem to change any minds.

:D

aeondaze
13th June 2016, 07:32 PM
[SIZE=3]Good to see you again Aeondaze. Well...as I said...we have been debating this since the GIM1 days...a decade...and never seem to change any minds.

Thats nice to hear Book. I get that and I've followed it somewhat (within reason) I just wanted to understand your reasoning with a concise but short summary.

cheka.
13th June 2016, 07:39 PM
playing along with the he was controlled crowd...

they sure went to a lot of trouble to get palestine. was all that really necessary?

Jewboo
13th June 2016, 07:41 PM
Thats nice to hear Book. I get that and I've followed it somewhat (within reason) I just wanted to understand your reasoning with a concise but short summary.

http://www.truthinourtime.com/2015/12/03/adolf-hitler-the-greatest-story-never-told/

Well...if you have six and a half hours watch this video. About as concise and short a summary as there is.

:D

Jewboo
13th June 2016, 07:47 PM
Hitler lived out his days in Argentina.



Not this shit again. You never provide us with any proof of this.

:rolleyes: post your evidence so we can make up our mind on this amazing theory

aeondaze
13th June 2016, 07:47 PM
playing along with the he was controlled crowd...

they sure went to a lot of trouble to get palestine. was all that really necessary?

no.

Unless of course the goal was to utterly destroy Europe, making a shit load of money in the process and then making even more with the reconstruction whilst completely gutting any jewish opposition.

To me it sounds like a win-win for them, oh and lets not forget how this affected jewish oposition for the 70 years that followed. Almost sounds too good to be true :rolleyes:

Jewboo
13th June 2016, 07:56 PM
Maybe JFK...?? Other than that I got nothin'



http://media.philly.com/images/jfk-head-angles-400.jpg

You got nothing. According to Hoarder the end result reveals JFK's original intent. He WANTED to get his head blown off that day.

There is also a GSUS member here who's sig line is "You know Jackie did it". He actually believes Jackie was the real shooter.

I'm done wasting my time in these threads...lol.

:D

aeondaze
13th June 2016, 08:01 PM
http://media.philly.com/images/jfk-head-angles-400.jpg

You got nothing. According to Hoarder the end result reveals JFK's original intent. He WANTED to get his head blown off that day.

There is also a GSUS member here who's sig line is "You know Jackie did it". He actually believes Jackie was the real shooter.

I'm done wasting my time in these threads...lol.

:D


Truth is chased from many villages.

hoarder
14th June 2016, 02:23 AM
Nope without any examples of real opposition, there really is no point in hope, we are hopelessly enslaved goyim.LEADERLESS RESISTANCE



The concept of Leaderless Resistance was proposed by Col. Ulius Louis Amoss, who was the founder of International Service of Information Incorporated, located in Baltimore, Maryland. Col. Amoss died more than fifteen years ago, but during his life was a tireless opponent of communism, as well as a skilled Intelligence Officer. Col. Amoss first wrote of Leaderless Resistance on April 17, 1962. His theories of organization were primarily directed against the threat of eventual Communist take-over in the United States. The present writer, with the benefit of having lived many years beyond Col. Amoss, has taken his theories and expounded upon them. Col. Amoss feared the Communists. This author fears the federal government. Communism now represents a threat to no one in the United States, while federal tyranny represents a threat to everyone . The writer has joyfully lived long enough to see the dying breaths of communism, but may, unhappily, remain long enough to see the last grasps of freedom in America.

In the hope that, somehow, America can still produce the brave sons and daughters necessary to fight off ever increasing persecution and oppression, this essay is offered. Frankly, it is too close to call at this point. Those who love liberty, and believe in freedom enough to fight for it are rare today, but within the bosom of every once great nation, there remains secreted, the pearls of former greatness. They are there. I have looked into their sparking eyes; sharing a brief moment in time with them as I passed through this life. Relished their friendship, endured their pain, and they mine. We are a band of brothers, native to the soil gaining strength one from another as we have rushed head long into a battle that all the weaker, timid men, say we can not win. Perhaps...but then again, perhaps we can. It's not over till the last freedom fighter is buried or imprisoned, or the same happens to those who would destroy their freedom.

Barring any cataclysmic events, the struggle will yet go on for years. The passage of time will make it clear to even the more slow among us that the government is the foremost threat to the life, and liberty of the folk. The government will no doubt make today's oppressiveness look like grade school work compared to what they have planned in the future. Meanwhile, there are those of us who continue to hope that somehow the few can do what the many have not. We are cognizant that before things get better they will certainly get worse as government shows a willingness to use ever more severe police state measures against dissidents. This changing situation makes it clear that those who oppose state repression must be prepared to alter, adapt, and modify their behavior, strategy, and tactics as circumstances warrant. Failure to consider new methods and implement them as necessary will make the government's efforts at suppression uncomplicated. It is the duty of every patriot to make the tyrant's life miserable. When one fails to do so he not only fails himself, but his people.

With this in mind, current methods of resistance to tyranny employed by those who love our race, culture, and heritage must pass a litmus test of soundness. Methods must be objectively measured as to their effectiveness, as well as to whether they make the government's intention of repression more possible or more difficult. Those not working to aid our objectives must be discarded or the government benefits from our failure to do so.

As honest men who have banded together into groups or associations of a political or religious nature are falsely labeled "domestic terrorists" or "cultists" and suppressed, it will become necessary to consider other methods of organization--or as the case may very well call for: non-organization. One should keep in mind that it is not in the government's interest to eliminate all groups. Some few must remain in order to perpetuate the smoke and mirrors vision for the masses that America is a "free democratic country" where dissent is allowed. Most organizations, however, that possess the potential for effective resistance will not be allowed to continue. Anyone who is so naive as to believe the most powerful government on earth will not crush any who pose a real threat to that power, should not be active, but rather, at home studying political history.

The question as to who is to be left alone and who is not, will be answered by how groups and individuals deal with several factors such as: avoidance of conspiracy plots, rejection of feeble minded malcontents, insistence upon quality of the participants, avoidance of all contact with the front men for the federals--the news media--and, finally, camouflage (which can be defined as the ability to blend in the public's eye the more committed groups of resistance with mainstream "kosher" associations that are generally seen as harmless.) Primarily though, whether any organization is allowed to continue in the future will be a matter of how big a threat a group represents. Not a threat in terms of armed might or political ability, for there is none of either for the present, but rather, threat in terms of potentiality. It is potential the federals fear most. Whether that potential exists in an individual or group is incidental. The federals measure potential threat in terms of what might happen given a situation conducive to action on the part of a restive organization or individual. Accurate intelligence gathering allows them to assess the potential. Showing one's hand before the bets are made, is a sure way to loose.

The movement for freedom is rapidly approaching the point where for many people, the option of belonging to a group will be nonexistent. For others, group membership will be a viable option for only the immediate future. Eventually, and perhaps much sooner than most believe possible, the price paid for membership will exceed any perceived benefit. But for now, some of the groups that do exist often serve a useful purpose either for the newcomer who can be indoctrinated into the ideology of the struggle, or for generating positive propaganda to reach potential freedom fighters. It is sure that, for the most part, this struggle is rapidly becoming a matter of individual action, each of its participants making a private decision in the quietness of his heart to resist: to resist by any means necessary. It is hard to know what others will do, for no man truly knows another man's heart. It is enough to know what one himself will do. A great teacher once said "know thyself." Few men really do, but let each of us, promise ourselves, not to go quietly to the fate our would-be masters have planned.

The concept of Leaderless Resistance is nothing less than a fundamental departure in theories of organization. The orthodox scheme of organization is diagrammatically represented by the pyramid, with the mass at the bottom and the leader at the top. This fundamental of organization is to be seen not only in armies, which are of course, the best illustration of the pyramid structure, with the mass of soldiery, the privates, at the bottom responsible to corporals who are in turn responsible to sergeants, and so on up the entire chain of command to the generals at the top. But the same structure is seen in corporations, ladies' garden clubs and in our political system itself. This orthodox "pyramid" scheme of organization is to be seen basically in all existing political, social and religious structures in the world today from the Federal government to the Roman Catholic Church. The Constitution of the United States, in the wisdom of the Founders, tried to sublimate the essential dictatorial nature of pyramidal organization by dividing authority into three: executive, legislative and judicial. But the pyramid remains essentially untouched.

This scheme of organization, the pyramid, is however, not only useless, but extremely dangerous for the participants when it is utilized in a resistance movement against state tyranny. Especially is this so in technologically advanced societies where electronic surveillance can often penetrate the structure revealing its chain of command. Experience has revealed over and over again that anti-state, political organizations utilizing this method of command and control are easy prey for government infiltration, entrapment, and destruction of the personnel involved. This has been seen repeatedly in the United States where pro-government infiltrators or agent provocateurs weasel their way into patriotic groups and destroy them from within.

In the pyramid type of organization, an infiltrator can destroy anything which is beneath his level of infiltration and often those above him as well. If the traitor has infiltrated at the top, then the entire organization from the top down is compromised and may be traduced at will.

An alternative to the pyramid type of organization is the cell system. In the past, many political groups (both right and left) have used the cell system to further their objectives. Two examples will suffice. During the American Revolution "committees of correspondence" were formed throughout the Thirteen colonies.

Their purpose was to subvert the government and thereby aid the cause of independence. The "Sons of Liberty", who made a name for themselves dumping government taxed tea into the harbor at Boston, were the action arm of the committees of correspondence. Each committee was a secret cell that operated totally independently of the other cells. Information on the government was passed from committee to committee, from colony to colony, and then acted upon on a local basis. Yet even in these bygone days of poor communication, of weeks to months for a letter to be delivered, the committees without any central direction whatsoever, were remarkable similar in tactics employed to resist government tyranny. It was, as the first American patriots knew, totally unnecessary for anyone to give an order for anything. Information was made available to each committee, and each committee acted as it saw fit. A recent example of the cell system taken from the left wing of politics are the Communists. The Communist, in order to get around the obvious problems involved in pyramidal organization, developed to an art the cell system. They had numerous independent cells which operated completely isolated from one another and particularly with no knowledge of each other, but were orchestrated together by a central headquarters. For instance, during World War II, in Washington, it is known that there were at least six secret Communist cells operating at high levels in the United States government (plus all the open Communists who were protected and promoted by President Roosevelt), however, only one of the cells was rooted out and destroyed. How many more actually were operating no one can say for sure.

The Communist cells which operated in the U.S until late 1991 under Soviet control could have at their command a leader, who held a social position which appeared to be very lowly. He could be, for example, a busboy in a restaurant, but in reality a colonel or a general in the Soviet Secret Service, the KGB. Under him could be a number of cells and a person active in one cell would almost never have knowledge of individuals who are active in another cell. The value of this is that while any one cell can be infiltrated, exposed or destroyed, such action will have no effect on the other cells; in fact, the members of the other cells will be supporting that cell which is under attack and ordinarily would lend very strong support to it in many ways. This is at least part of the reason, no doubt, that whenever in the past Communists were attacked in this country, support for them sprang up in many unexpected places.

The efficient and effective operation of a cell system after the Communist model, is of course, dependent upon central direction, which means impressive organization, funding from the top, and outside support, all of which the Communists had. Obviously, American patriots have none of these things at the top or anywhere else, and so an effective cell organization based upon the Soviet system of operation is impossible.

Two things become clear from the above discussion. First, that the pyramid type of organization can be penetrated quite easily and it thus is not a sound method of organization in situations where the government has the resources and desire to penetrate the structure; which is the situation in this country. Secondly, that the normal qualifications for the cell structure based upon the Red model does not exist in the U.S. for patriots. This understood, the question arises "What method is left for those resisting state tyranny?" The answer comes from Col. Amoss who proposed the "Phantom Cell" mode of organization. Which he described as Leaderless Resistance. A system of organization that is based upon the cell organization, but does not have any central control or direction, that is in fact almost identical to the methods used by the Committees of Correspondence during the American Revolution. Utilizing the Leaderless Resistance concept, all individuals and groups operate independently of each other, and never report to a central headquarters or single leader for direction or instruction, as would those who belong to a typical pyramid organization.

At first glance, such a type of organization seems unrealistic, primarily because there appears to be no organization. The natural question thus arises as to how are the "Phantom cells" and individuals to cooperate with each other when there is no intercommunication or central direction? The answer to this question is that participants in a program of Leaderless Resistance through phantom cell or individual action must know exactly what they are doing, and how to do it. It becomes the responsibility of the individual to acquire the necessary skills and information as to what is to be done. This is by no means as impractical as it appears, because it is certainly true that in any movement, all persons involved have the same general outlook, are acquainted with the same philosophy, and generally react to given situations in similar ways. The pervious history of the committees of correspondence during the American Revolution show this to be true.

Since the entire purpose of Leaderless Resistance is to defeat state tyranny (at least insofar as this essay is concerned), all members of phantom cells or individuals will tend to react to objective events in the same way through usual tactics of resistance. Organs of information distribution such as newspapers, leaflets, computers, etc., which are widely available to all, keep each person informed of events, allowing for a planned response that will take many variations. No one need issue an order to anyone. Those idealist truly committed to the cause of freedom will act when they feel the time is ripe, or will take their cue from others who precede them. While it is true that much could be said against this type of structure as a method of resistance, it must be kept in mind that Leaderless Resistance is a child of necessity. The alternatives to it have been show to be unworkable or impractical. Leaderless Resistance has worked before in the American Revolution, and if the truly committed put it to use for themselves, it will work now.

It goes almost without saying that Leaderless Resistance leads to very small or even one man cells of resistance. Those who join organizations to play "let's pretend" or who are "groupies" will quickly be weeded out. While for those who are serious about their opposition to federal despotism, this is exactly what is desired.

From the point of view of tyrants and would be potentates in the federal bureaucracy and police agencies, nothing is more desirable than that those who oppose them be UNIFIED in their command structure, and that every person who opposes them belong to a pyramid type group. Such groups and organizations are an easy kill. Especially in light of the fact that the Justice (sic) Department promised in 1987 that there would never be another group that opposed them that they did not have at least one informer in. These federal "friends of government" are intelligence agents. They gather information that can be used at the whim of a federal D.A. to prosecute. The line of battle has been drawn. Patriots are required therefore, to make a conscious decision to either aid the government in its illegal spying, by continuing with old methods of organization and resistance, or to make the enemie's job more difficult by implementing effective countermeasures.

Now there will, no doubt, be mentally handicapped people out there who, while standing at a podium with an American flag draped in the background, and a lone eagle soaring in the sky above, will state emphatically in their best sounding red, white, and blue voice, "So what if the government is spying? We are not violating any laws." Such crippled thinking by any serious person is the best example that there is a need for special education classes. The person making such a statement is totally out of contact with political reality in this country, and unfit for leadership of any thing more than a dog sleigh in the Alaskan wilderness. The old "Born on the fourth of July" mentality that has influenced so much of the American patriot's thinking in the past will not save him from the government in the future. "Reeducation" for non-thinkers of this type will take place in the federal prison system where there are no flags or eagles, but abundance of men who were "not violating any law."

Most groups who "unify" their disparate associates into a single structure have short political lives. Therefore, those movement leaders constantly calling for unity of organization rather than the desirable unity of purpose, usually fall into one of three categories.

They may not be sound political tacticians, but rather, just committed men who feel unity would help their cause, while not realizing that the government would greatly benefit from such efforts. The Federal objective, to imprison or destroy all who oppose them, is made easier in pyramid organizations. Or perhaps, they do not fully understand the struggle they are involved in and that the government they oppose has declared a state of war against those fighting for faith, folk, freedom and constitutional liberty. Those in power will use any means to rid themselves of opposition. The third class calling for unity and let us hope this is the minority of the three, are men more desirous of the supposed power that a large organization would bestow, than of actually achieving their stated purpose.

Conversely, the last thing Federal snoops would have, if they had any choice in the matter, is a thousand different small phantom cells opposing them. It is easy to see why. Such a situation is an intelligence nightmare for a government intent upon knowing everything they possibly can about those who oppose them. The Federals, able to amass overwhelming strength of numbers, manpower, resources, intelligence gathering, and capability at any given time, need only a focal point to direct their anger. A single penetration of a pyramid type of organization can lead to the destruction of the whole. Whereas, Leaderless Resistance presents no single opportunity for the Federals to destroy a significant portion of the Resistance.

With the announcement by the Department of Justice (sic) that 300 FBI agents formerly assigned to watching Soviet spies in the US (domestic counter intelligence) are now to be used to "combat crime", the federal government is preparing the way for a major assault upon those persons opposed to their policies. Many anti-government groups dedicated to the preservation of the America of our forefathers can expect shortly to feel the brunt of a new federal assault upon liberty.

It is clear, therefore, that it is time to rethink traditional strategy and tactics when it comes to opposing a modern police state. America is quickly moving into a long dark night of police state tyranny, where the rights now accepted by most as being inalienable will disappear. Let the coming night be filled with a thousand points of resistance. Like the fog which forms when conditions are right and disappears when they are not, so must the resistance to tyranny be.

Louis Beam

Neuro
14th June 2016, 03:49 AM
LEADERLESS RESISTANCE is a fantasy it isn't real opposition. I give you that at certain times of complete economic, cultural and political collapse of a corrupt system, you may have what is called leaderless resistance in that people stop obeying the old corrupt leadership. However pretty soon new leaders start emerging, some from the old nomenclature (Jeltsin, Putin), some from the opposition/resistance (Lech Walesa, Wachlaw Havel), some from criminal gangs (Jew Oligarchs). 90% of the population wants to be told what they should do, thus leaderless resistance can only exist for a very short time when the old leadership system collapses under the weight of its own corruption, and a new hasn't been emerging.

hoarder
14th June 2016, 06:50 AM
Regardless of whether Hitler was a Khazar or not, most of you are aware that controlled opposition is a tactic Jews commonly use. Some of you may think that you can be certain whether or not such a person is a crypto, but you have to realize that they have been fooling gentiles this way for thousands of years, have taken notes on what works and what doesn't and groomed such spies from childhood. This is simply the nature of the beast and the sooner we realize it the better.
Understanding this, we realize it's foolish to wait for our Ron Paul or Donald Trump to save us or wake up the masses. YOU are the leadership and YOU must save us and wake up the masses.

Jewboo
14th June 2016, 07:28 AM
Regardless of whether Hitler was a Khazar or not, most of you are aware that controlled opposition is a tactic Jews commonly use. Some of you may think that you can be certain whether or not such a person is a crypto, but you have to realize that they have been fooling gentiles this way for thousands of years, have taken notes on what works and what doesn't and groomed such spies from childhood. This is simply the nature of the beast and the sooner we realize it the better.
Understanding this, we realize it's foolish to wait for our Ron Paul or Donald Trump to save us or wake up the masses. YOU are the leadership and YOU must save us and wake up the masses.


http://www.ingannati.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/titanic.jpg


(AFTER I TOSS TROUBLEMAKER HOARDER OVERBOARD)

Anybody else got something to say? No? Good. Now start rowing bitches!

http://gotmobile.freeforums.org/images/smilies/Search.gif

Neuro
14th June 2016, 07:34 AM
Regardless of whether Hitler was a Khazar or not, most of you are aware that controlled opposition is a tactic Jews commonly use. Some of you may think that you can be certain whether or not such a person is a crypto, but you have to realize that they have been fooling gentiles this way for thousands of years, have taken notes on what works and what doesn't and groomed such spies from childhood. This is simply the nature of the beast and the sooner we realize it the better.
Understanding this, we realize it's foolish to wait for our Ron Paul or Donald Trump to save us or wake up the masses. YOU are the leadership and YOU must save us and wake up the masses.

The problem with becoming the leadership is that YOU will call us controlled opposition whatever we do... :)

StreetsOfGold
14th June 2016, 07:43 AM
Still promoting the LYING Jesuit narrative "it's da joos"??

The Vatican HAS THE MONEY! Not "da joos"
The land and buildings from just a few countries the Vatican has "satellite" "offices" in (pagan temples, schools, colleges, universities, etc) could pay off the national debt of every nation on earth and it has offices, lands and buildings in every nation on earth, the wealth of this OLDEST and RICHEST country on earth (Vatican city) is so immense it cannot be properly measured and you idiots are squabbling about "da joos"

How incredible PITIFUL and idiotic!!

http://gold-silver.us/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=8132&d=1458143499

hoarder
14th June 2016, 08:23 AM
The problem with becoming the leadership is that YOU will call us controlled opposition whatever we do... :)Controlled opposition is the Jewish modus operandi. You know it and I know it. If you or I ever have any significant amount of influence, we understand that such accusations go with the territory. I don't know about you, but I welcome such suspicion. Any "leader" who punishes suspicion is controlled opposition.

singular_me
14th June 2016, 08:51 AM
insightful to see neuro (and others) again to embrace statism, which is precisely why we are in this mega mess, because people would rather die that think for themselves, hence expect leaders to represent them. LOL

spreading the word to save oneself is the only solution. The One and the Whole are same. Separateness (divide and rule) is a scheme that is as old as mankind therefore, and which the talmudists and freemasons have very well understood and manipulate at will. They are merely using and corrupting a Natural Law (macro is micro and otherwise) to enslave us all.

the 7 Natural Laws are immutable, stop fighting and embrace them. They are God's Laws.

Jewboo
14th June 2016, 09:00 AM
http://starwrecked.com/contents/other-parts/Deep-Space-Nine-Louise-Fletcher-Kai-Winn/One-Flew-Over-The-Cuckoos-Nest-Nurse-Mildred-Ratched-11.jpg

insightful to see neuro (and others) again to embrace statism, which is precisely why we are in this mega mess, because people would rather die that think for themselves, hence expect leaders to represent them. LOL





Neuro is one of the few sane people still here.

:rolleyes: ...but thanks for your "insightful" observation Goldi