NARRATIVE FAIL: Orlando Islamic Terrorist Did NOT Use An AR-15

[Ares]

The anti-gun politimedia wasted no time at all demonizing the most common rifle in the United States as being the real villain of the Islamic terrorist attack on Pulse nightclub in Orlando.

Newsweek screamed, "ORLANDO SHOOTING PUTS SPOTLIGHT ON AR-15 RIFLE. (http://www.newsweek.com/orlando-shooting-puts-spotlight-ar-15-rifle-469906)”

Judd Legume of Think Progress squeaked, “The NRA’s Love Affair With The AR-15, Weapon Of Choice For Mass Murderers, In 22 Tweets. (http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/06/13/3787680/nra-ar15-tweets/)”

Always wrong Christopher Ingraham of the Washington Post whined, “The gun used in the Orlando shooting is becoming mass shooters’ weapon of choice. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/06/12/the-gun-used-in-the-orlando-shooting-is-becoming-mass-shooters-weapon-of-choice/)”

Here’s the thing.

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was not an AR-15.

http://cdn.bearingarms.com/uploads/2016/06/sig-suaer-mcx-e1465858567210.jpg

The rifle used by the Islamist terrorist in Orlando was instead a Sig Sauer MCX carbine, a modular, multi-caliber (able to swap to different calibers, including 5.56 NATO, 300 BLK, and 7.62×39) rifle system that sometimes utilizes STANAG magazines common to more than 60 different firearms, but otherwise has no major parts that interface with AR-15s in any way, shape or form.

This of course, will make no difference at all to the anti-gun politimedia, who don’t particularly care about factual accuracy and who likely wouldn’t be able to tell an AR-15 from a toaster oven if their lives depended on it.

http://cdn.bearingarms.com/uploads/2016/06/media-guide-firearms1-e1465859335250.jpg

All the media cares about is that they’ve wrapped their anti-gun dreams on demonizing the most popular rifle sold in the United States, and they’re going to keep attacking it, whether or not it was used in any particular incident or not.

http://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/06/13/narrative-fail-orlando-islamic-terrorist-use-ar-15/

[Dogman]

Apples vs oranges in the greater scheme of things.

Despite what was used in reality, even automatic vs semi auto, what counts is it happened and it was a gun.

Hell listen to the tapes/recordings of the firefight, which one hell of a bunch of rounds were fired by the cops, and to the trained ear non of the cops rounds fired were automatic, all semi auto..Automatic has a sound all of its own.

It is to the point it does not matter what type of gun, mistakes included by the media on what type gun it was.

What counted is it was a dam gun that could fire a huge bunch of rounds as seeing by the not knowing sheep

I still hold we are at the point or near it that nationally , the killings have crossed the point of one too many killed. And it doesn't matter whether it was kids or gays, but more of it was humans killed.

The writing is on the wall, ether this killing or the next, shit will change because the majority will demand it.

This comes from knowing that I can buy any dam gun I want, up to a full automatic it I wanted to pay the dam taxes and certificates, but as I said last night on another thread here, some people are a danger even using a screwdriver and god help us if they have any guns..

I love my freedoms and again I will repeat what I said last night, I do fear if you give the gov an inch they will want to take a mile, but the choice is mostly out of level headed gun owners hands now, fear and disgust of the general public will drive the change of gun laws I can see coming.

And that you can take to the bank. its just a matter of time. The wild west mentally in america will become more controlled, and more scrutiny will be given to any gun buy..which I really do not care about, other than it for me would take more time, maybe. I have nothing to fear, but some here might.

But it does suck being dagged into this what I am sure is coming because of idiots or not. All of this is mostly because of the internet and the connectivity we have today.

Welcome to modern and increasingly connected society, that with the good , u have to live with the bad.

One thing that is true in life, there is not a dam thing that stays the same, it is ether adapt of be left in the dust.

Did any of you know bunch of people in my past know me as "Dusty" which is my nickname?

;D

[PatColo]

STATE OF EMERGENCY! 50 Dead In Orlando “Terror Attack” At LGBTQ Club (http://crazzfiles.com/state-of-emergency-50-dead-in-orlando-terror-attack-at-lgbtq-club/)

^ interesting graph in there about "mass shootings" by president; 6x increase under O'bummer vs Shrub & most prior presnits.

[Joshua01]

An excellent read, thank you
STATE OF EMERGENCY! 50 Dead In Orlando “Terror Attack” At LGBTQ Club (http://crazzfiles.com/state-of-emergency-50-dead-in-orlando-terror-attack-at-lgbtq-club/)

[PatColo]

6 mins

100% PROOF Orlando Shooting Was a STAGED HOAX...This Is All You Need To See

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc

[midnight rambler]

6 mins

100% PROOF Orlando Shooting Was a STAGED HOAX...This Is All You Need To See

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc

Google street view confirms info in video.

[ximmy]

STATE OF EMERGENCY! 50 Dead In Orlando “Terror Attack” At LGBTQ Club (http://crazzfiles.com/state-of-emergency-50-dead-in-orlando-terror-attack-at-lgbtq-club/)

^ interesting graph in there about "mass shootings" by president; 6x increase under O'bummer vs Shrub & most prior presnits.

When all incidents where four or more people were shot in a single event are broken out by president going back to Reagan (considering the database only stretches back to 1982), there just so happens to have been a startling increase in mass shootings since Obama, the most pro-gun control president America has had in modern history, took office.

Mass Shootings under the Last Five Presidents

Ronald Reagan: 1981-1989 (8 years) 11 mass shootings
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5
George H. W. Bush: 1989-1993 (4 years) 12 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 3

Bill Clinton: 1993-2001 (8 years) 23 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 4
George W. Bush: 2001-2009 (8 years) 20 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5

Barrack H. Obama: 2009-2015 (in 7th year) 162 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 18
(You can download the full list of names, dates, locations, and numbers of deaths per mass shooting by president prepared for this article here (http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Mass-Murders-1981-2015-under-5-presidents.pdf).)
Look at the difference between all other presidents and Barack Obama.
What that looks like on a chart:
http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/msbypres.jpg (http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/msbypres.jpg)
Notice anything here? We’re talking about a more than six-fold increase from the number of mass shootings in the eight years Bush Jr. was president compared to the last seven years under Obama, and his 2nd term isn’t even up yet!

[Ares]

LOL classic

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1465923748331.jpg

[Joshua01]

LOL classic

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1465923748331.jpg

If only Trump would put this in Shillary's face that would be pure gold

[JohnQPublic]

6 mins

100% PROOF Orlando Shooting Was a STAGED HOAX...This Is All You Need To See

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc

Only possibility is the emergency room was overfilled, and they were told to take them back to EMTs on scene?

[Shami-Amourae]

6 mins

100% PROOF Orlando Shooting Was a STAGED HOAX...This Is All You Need To See

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLk-V9DFpc

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1465/92/1465929423025.jpg



Fedora
Cargo Shorts
That Shirt


I thought gays were supposed to have a sense of fashion.

Worst False Flag to date guys.

[Cebu_4_2]

Only possibility is the emergency room was overfilled, and they were told to take them back to EMTs on scene?


There were no ambulances. The 'injured' were being carried towards the club. Just way too many things wrong.

[Alex Drone]

http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/msbypres.jpg (http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/msbypres.jpg)

What this graph really shows is that the shock of 9/11 was fading from the public mind. So in order justify the never-ending and fraudulent War on Terror the elites had to devise new strategies to maintain the fear among Americans. 20-year Marine Corps military intelligence and CIA officer David Steele said:

Most terrorists are false flag terrorists, or are created by our own security services. In the United States, every single terrorist incident we have had has been a false flag, or has been an informant pushed on by the FBI. In fact, we now have citizens taking out restraining orders against FBI informants that are trying to incite terrorism. We’ve become a lunatic asylum.

These "terrorist" shootings are a drop in the bucket compared to how many civilians in the Middle East have been killed due to the War on Terror.

[PatColo]

DDuke enshrines official orlando story... the more he dishonestly "maintains cred" wrt dinjoo FFs/hoaxes/fake-reality like this & 911 & holohoax etc; the more irrelevant he becomes. 8 mins:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=6GPo64-G8Co

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GPo64-G8Co

[Joshua01]

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/firing-ar-15-horrifying-dangerous-loud-article-1.2673201

The recoil bruised my shoulder. The brass shell casings disoriented me as they flew past my face. The smell of sulfur and destruction made me sick. The explosions — loud like a bomb — gave me a temporary case of PTSD. For at least an hour after firing the gun just a few times, I was anxious and irritable. - Gersh Kuntzman, 2016

[Alex Drone]

DDuke enshrines official orlando story... the more he dishonesty "maintains cred" wrt dinjoo FFs/hoaxes/fake-reality like this & 911 & holohoax etc; the more irrelevant he becomes. 8 mins:

I generally like David Duke, but I have a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that he still buys the official stories to all these events. I don't know if Duke's doing this because he's been degenerated by the mainstream media so much that he has to relent on a few things. Maybe he is trying to attract those who's still on the fence when it comes to Jewish conspiracies, but would have been turned off if he talked about 9/11 and various shootings being a hoax.

[PatColo]

8 mins
Orlando Shooting HOAX: Crisis Actor Returns Gun BAN Agenda EXPOSED (Redsilverj)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3o_acLkn0I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3o_acLkn0I


4 mins
https://youtube.com/watch?v=bNe3-QmLXO0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNe3-QmLXO0


4 other RSJ Orlando vids at http://youtube.com/channel/UCqRScKbESN0th-TdlmaQ6oQ/videos

[Shami-Amourae]

BTFO by a (((Constitutional law professor)))....

How long will you continue to live in your murderous delusional world gun fags?

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1465/95/1465951763412.png (http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-its-time-to-repeal-the-second-amendment-right-bear-arms-20160613)

>Freedom is a threat to liberty
What did they mean by this?

[PatColo]

New meme: The Orlando HoloHoax HomoCaust HomoHoax. :D

[Alex Drone]

BTFO by a (((Constitutional law professor)))....

How long will you continue to live in your murderous delusional world gun fags?

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1465/95/1465951763412.png (http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-its-time-to-repeal-the-second-amendment-right-bear-arms-20160613)


Written by a Cohen ... surprise, surprise.

[Shami-Amourae]

Written by a (((Cohen))) ... surprise, surprise.

Listen to that echo.

Just a coincidence.

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1461/36/1461368981843.jpg

[monty]

BTFO by a (((Constitutional law professor)))....

How long will you continue to live in your murderous delusional world gun fags?

http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1465/95/1465951763412.png

>Freedom is a threat to liberty
What did they mean by this?


Another Constitutional expert's opinion; addresses Dogman's concern some are
not capable of handling a screwdriver:

yes, it is tl:dr . . . . .


A SERIOUS QUESTION FOR THE NRA
PART 1 of 2

By Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr., Ph.D., J.D. (http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin.htm)
June 14, 2016NewsWithViews.comAs regular readers of my commentaries know, from time to time I have written about the National Rifle Association’s curious misreading of the Second Amendment—to wit, that the Amendment’s first thirteen words (“[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State”) have no significance with respect to the interpretation and application of the Amendment’s last fourteen words (“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”). According to the NRA, the Second Amendment secures “the individual right to keep and bear arms”, to which “[a] well regulated Militia” is irrelevant.

I must describe the NRA’s fixation as a most curious misreading of the Second Amendment because, if “the individual right to keep and bear arms” is irrelevant to “[a] well regulated Militia”, then by dint of the NRA’s own linguistic logic “the individual right to keep and bear arms” must be equally irrelevant to “the security of a free State” to which the Amendment declares that such a Militia is “necessary”. If so, then the NRA’s reading of the Amendment is at odds with its contention that “the individual right to keep and bear arms” guarantees Americans the wherewithal to preserve “the Blessings of Liberty” promised by the Constitution in its Preamble. For, if “the individual right to keep and bear arms” is as irrelevant to “the security of a free State” as it supposedly is to “[a] well regulated Militia”, it passes understanding that it could guarantee any aspect of “a free State”, including especially the “Liberty” of that State’s citizens.

This apparent conundrum is, of course, not the product of the Constitution. For, according to the most basic rules of constitutional interpretation, the NRA’s construction of the Second Amendment is impossible. In general, “t cannot be presumed, that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect”. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 174 (1803). And “n expounding the Constitution * * * , every word must have its due force, and appropriate meaning; for it is evident from the whole instrument, that no word was unnecessarily used, or needlessly added”. [I]Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 550, 570-571 (1840). Moreover, with respect in particular to the clause “[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State”, “t cannot be supposed that the framers of the Constitution did not use this expression with deliberation or failed to appreciate its plain significance”. [I]Wright v. United States, 302 U.S. 583, 587-588 (1938). See also, e.g., Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 151-152 (1926); Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U.S. 41, 87 (1900); Blake v. McClung, 172 U.S. 239, 260-261 (1898); Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 44 (1957) (opinion of Frankfurter, J.).

My emphasis on this peculiar situation is not simply a matter of constitutional pedantry devoid of practical consequences. For, by widely disseminating its misreading of the Second Amendment among the general public, the NRA lends credibility to a most dangerous misconception—to wit, that Americans can secure for themselves “the Blessings of Liberty” by purely individual actions alone, when every page in the book of American political and legal theory and history teaches that popular sovereignty, popular self-government, and the “Blessings of Liberty” that go with them necessarily entail, and can be achieved and maintained only through, collective endeavors by WE THE PEOPLE as a whole. No one who studies America’s Colonial Charters, the Declaration of Independence, the constitutions of the independent States, the Articles of Confederation, the original Constitution, and even the Second Amendment can come to any other conclusion.

I have tried, on more than one occasion, to call this matter to the attention of the NRA, for the purpose of encouraging the organization to reassess its position and become a proponent of revitalization of “the Militia of the several States”, as the only sure and certain means to provide for “the security of a free State” throughout this country. To date, however, these efforts have proven unsuccessful.Perhaps my failures are exclusively my fault. But, then again, perhaps not. Inasmuch as my own estimation of cause and effect might be considered biased, I shall put it to my readers to judge for themselves. Below, I reproduce (with some minor redactions) a letter which I wrote several months ago to certain members of the NRA’s Board of Directors, explaining why the NRA should promote revitalization of the Militia, and soliciting their support to that end. To date, I have received not a single response. The question which perplexes me is, “Why not?” Is revitalization of the Militia a matter which is not to be taken seriously? Or am I, personally, not to be taken seriously? Or is the NRA’s championship of the Second Amendment not to be taken seriously?

It may be that some of the readers of this commentary will conclude that what I have recommended in the letter reproduced below makes sense, and that the NRA should pay some little attention to it. If so, they might consider contacting the NRA, and asking “Why not?” At some point, an answer needs to be had.

[LETTER TO NRA DIRECTORS]
25 January 2016National Rifle Association Directors * * *
c/o NRA Office of the Secretary
11250 Waples Mill Road
Fairfax, Virginia 22030Re: The NRA’s necessary rôle in revitalization of “the Militia of the several States”

Dear NRA Directors * * * :

As a long-time member of the National Rifle Association * * * , I write in order to urge each of you, as members of the NRA’s Board of Directors, to bring to the Board’s attention the necessity for the NRA to recognize the urgency of the declaration in the Second Amendment that “[a] well regulated Militia” is “necessary to the security of a free State” at this critical juncture in the course of human events, and for that reason to become the leading participant in a nationwide movement to revitalize what the Constitution denotes as “the Militia of the several States”. I believe that it is particularly fitting for, as well as incumbent upon, me to make this request, as I have written several books on this subject—including Constitutional “Homeland Security”, Volume One, The Nation in Arms (2007); Constitutional “Homeland Security”, Volume Two, The Sword and Sovereignty (2012); Constitutional “Homeland Security”, Volume Three, By Tyranny Out of Necessity: The Bastardy of “Martial Law” (2014 and 2016); Three Rights(2013); and Thirteen Words (2013)—as well as numerous commentaries originally published at the website <www.newswithviews.com> since 2005 and now widely dispersed across the internet.


I have undertaken these efforts neither for my own entertainment nor with any realistic hope of financial gain from a lucrative publishing enterprise. Instead, my goal has been simply to elucidate the truth of the matter, to educate my fellow countrymen about it, to encourage them to become personally involved in the revitalization of “the Militia of the several States”, and to effect as much political and legislative movement in that direction within the States as possible as soon as possible—or, as I like to put it, immediately, if not sooner. I realize, however, that I cannot accomplish this goal simply by disseminating my work in “the free marketplace of ideas” without a significant measure of assistance from others better situated than I am to reach large numbers of Americans with this message. Therefore, this letter.

A. The revitalization of “the Militia of the several States” is critical for our country’s survival.The first thirteen words of the Second Amendment—“[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State”—constitute more than a merely hortatory pronouncement, hoary with the dust of a bygone era, that today has no practical relevance to the Amendment’s last fourteen words. Rather, those words constitute: (i) a finding of historical fact—to wit, that Americans secured “a free State” for themselves by virtue of their organization in “well regulated Militia”; (ii) a conclusion of constitutional law—to wit, that such Militia must always exist within every State in the Union, just as Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 and 16 and Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution presume that they will; and (iii) an admonition which the Founders of this country drew from both political theory and their own experiences—to wit, that “a free State” cannot long exist anywhere within this country without “well regulated Militia” everywhere throughout this country.In the “well regulated” form which the Constitution requires, however, “the Militia of the several States” are nowhere to be found in America today:




• The National Guard and the Naval Militia in which some Americans are enrolled are not “militia” of any sort. Rather, they are the “Troops, or Ships of War” which the States may “keep * * * in time of Peace” “with[ ] the Consent of Congress”, pursuant to Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 of the Constitution. This (among other things) explains why they are not based upon near-universal compulsory membership, and why they can be called upon to perform services for the United States beyond the three specified in Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 for which alone Congress may “provide for calling forth the Militia”.

• The so-called “unorganized militia” to which most Americans are consigned by statute—in 10 U.S.C. § 311(b)(2) and, for example, Code of Virginia §§ 44-1 and 44-4—is no constitutionalMilitia, either. For no part of any constitutional Militia can be “unorganized”. Indeed, Article I, Section 8, Clause 16 of the Constitution of the United States empowers Congress “[t]o provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia”—notfor leaving the Militia “unorganiz[ed]”. And Article I, Section 13 of the Constitution of Virginia defines “a well regulated militia” as being “composed of the body of the people, trained to arms”—which, plainly enough, an “unorganized” Militia can never be, unless “the people” can somehow be “trained to arms” without being organized to that end.

• Finally, the various “private militia” which have sprung up across this country (including * * * in Virginia) in recent years are not constitutional Militia, because they are not “regulated” at all pursuant to statute, and therefore cannot claim (let alone assert) any specifically governmental authority. Under the First Amendment, they may adopt the title “militia” with as much freedom as they may style themselves “the Palace Guard of the Grand Duchess of Gerolstein”. But in either case the self-description is fanciful; and as far as the description “militia” is concerned, it is feckless for the purpose for which they put it forth.




This is a truly impossible situation for a country which, in its fundamental law, holds up “[a] well regulated Militia” as “being necessary to the security of a free State”. The notion that “private militia” could provide “the security of a free State” is delusive, because “private militia” can exist only in, and themselves require protection by, “a free State”. The notion that the States’ “Troops, or Ships of War” could provide “the security of a free State” is dangerous, because “a free State” must always closely control a “standing army”, which it can hardly expect to do if “the standing army” is the sole source of its “security”. And the notion that an “unorganized militia” could provide “the security of a free State” is disastrous, because an “unorganized militia” is effectively not in existence at all, and therefore cannot possibly supply what is “necessary” for anyone’s “security”. So, confronted by numerous dire threats, from international “terrorism” to domestic economic collapse, our country risks not simply a nationwide crisis, but even a national débâcle, should this situation fail to be corrected immediately, if not sooner.B. For this country to survive in its traditional form, Americans must revitalize their Militia, because “well regulated Militia” are the “necessary”—indeed, the natural, the inevitable, and the indispensable—institutions through which the Power of the Sword is organized and employed for “the security of a free State”.



http://www.newswithviews.com/images/boxes/shop-btn-anim.gif (http://www.newswithviewsstore.com/mm5/merchant.mvc)



In any truly “free State”—that is, in any polity in which the people have absorbed the political principles of popular sovereignty, and therefore desire and strive to govern themselves—the people will instinctually, intuitively, and eventually intellectually recognize the importance of the Militia to that end. If incompetent or disloyal political leaders fail, neglect, or refuse to provide a program for establishment of the Militia according to law, patriots will undertake to make up for that deficiency on their own.



Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name



*[I]required field






Unfortunately, just because the Militia are inevitable in principle does not guarantee that their advent will be timely in practice. Patriotic Americans may finally attempt to revitalize the Militia only when their efforts prove to be too little and too late. After all (as I can testify from personal experience), in the contemporary United States the few private individuals who and ad hoc groups which openly favor revitalization of the Militia along constitutional lines lack the numbers, the influence among the general public, and especially the financial wherewithal to hope to be successful in the very near term in even a single State. For part two click below.Click here for part -----> 1 (http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin287.htm), 2 (http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin288.htm),



© 2016 Edwin Vieira, Jr. - All Rights Reserved


http://w.sharethis.com/chicklets/email.gif http://w.sharethis.com/chicklets/facebook.gif http://w.sharethis.com/chicklets/twitter.gif http://w.sharethis.com/chicklets/sharethis.gifShare This Article
Click Here For Mass E-mailing


Edwin Vieira, Jr., holds four degrees from Harvard: A.B. (Harvard College), A.M. and Ph.D. (Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences), and J.D. (Harvard Law School).


For more than thirty years he has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment.



He has written numerous monographs and articles in scholarly journals, and lectured throughout the county. His most recent work on money and banking is the two-volume Pieces of Eight (http://www.piecesofeight.us/): The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution (2002), the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective. www.piecesofeight.us (http://www.piecesofeight.us/)



He is also the co-author (under a nom de plume) of the political novel CRA$HMAKER (http://www.crashmaker.com/): A Federal Affaire (2000), a not-so-fictional story of an engineered crash of the Federal Reserve System, and the political upheaval it causes. www.crashmaker.com (http://www.crashmaker.com/)



His latest book is: "How To Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary (http://www.newswithviews.com/HNB/Hot_New_Books20.htm)" ... and Constitutional "Homeland Security, (http://www.amazon.com/Constitutional-Homeland-Security-Americans-Revitalize/dp/0967175925/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2/002-8740607-9708809?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1177038725&sr=1-2)" Volume One, The Nation in Arms...



He can be reached at his new address:
52 Stonegate Court
Front Royal, VA 22630.

E-Mail: Not available


http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin287.htm

[collector]

It's a "threat to liberty " LOL - define liberty rabii Cohen ....

[Horn]

Only possibility is the emergency room was overfilled, and they were told to take them back to EMTs on scene?

I dont see any sane official telling a bunch of hooligans to carry injured toward ambulances. Those guys seeing ambulances on the scene after they ran some blocks away while injured then having their friends carry them back there afterwards is very possible.

Would think these details of the shooter frequenting the club a dozen times were pretty key to the fact that this gay wannabe bum weren't any "Islamic Terrorist" either.

Witness: Omar Mateen had been at Orlando gay nightclub many times

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/pulse-orlando-nightclub-shooting/os-orlando-nightclub-omar-mateen-profile-20160613-story.html

[PatColo]

I generally like David Duke, but I have a hard time wrapping my head around the fact that he still buys the official stories to all these events. I don't know if Duke's doing this because he's been degenerated by the mainstream media so much that he has to relent on a few things. Maybe he is trying to attract those who's still on the fence when it comes to Jewish conspiracies, but would have been turned off if he talked about 9/11 and various shootings being a hoax.

I see what u're saying; but DD is damagingly propping up, enshrining the dinjooz' Big-Lie-Pretext narratives for their total tyranny rollout. He tries to "sell" this to his base, wrapped in addressing their valid concerns over the (dinjoo-orchestrated) culture-destroying im/migration problem; but DD doesn't even bang on the "dinjoo-orchestrated" part of that much that I've heard.

In this DD show he touts that latest vid, then has on a UK guest to talk about our mutual dinjoo-orchestrated fake "scary moozlemismist terrorism problem." /face-palm :(

David Duke Show 2016.06.14
Dr. Duke has special guest Mark Collet of the UK on Brexit & The Orlando Terror & The Dark Side of Diversity video is now out!
http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2016/06/david-duke-show-20160614.html

[Alex Drone]

It is bothersome that DD pins the Orlando event on lax immigration laws when in fact immigration has little to nothing to do with what happened this past weekend regardless of whether it was false flag or not. DD may in fact be controlled, which wouldn't be surprising considering his high popularity. But I dunno, perhaps Duke had his life threatened. Anyway, thanks for pointing this out. It gives me some ideas for my blog.

[PatColo]

Find all the following threads at http://memoryholeblog.com,

Orlando Nightclub Shooting: Questions and Anomalies Surround ‘Worst Mass Shooting in U.S. History’
By Vivian Lee The “worst mass shooting in U.S. history” is reported to have occurred between 2 am and 5 am on Sunday morning, June 12, at Pulse, a nightclub in Orlando, Florida. The “act of terror” is said to have produced 49 dead and 53 injured. A 50th death was that of the … Continue reading →
June 14, 2016 45 Replies

Orlando via Paris – ‘Covering 11/13: The Stagecraft of “Reliable” Sources’
The last academic project I developed before being removed from my tenured associate professor position at Florida Atlantic University was titled, "Covering 11/13: The Stagecraft of Reliable Sources," an invited contribution to Dr. Kevin Barrett's 2016 edited volume, Another French False Flag? … Continue reading →
June 13, 2016 27 Replies

Orlando Mass-Casualty Drill: Emergency Nurses Association Used Central Florida as Training Ground in Late 2015
Lori Price legitgov.org Below is a screenshot taken today of the Orlando Sentinel. The story, entitled "Drill prepares emergency nurses for mass casualties," was published 02 October 2015. Above that article is an alert banner, featuring today's news: "Live updates: Mass shooting at Pulse … Continue reading →
June 13, 2016 18 Replies

Open Thread – Orlando 6/12/16 – ‘Worst Mass Shooting in US History’
Gov. Scott: 'We Will Devote Every Resource Available to Assist with Orlando Shooting' FLGov TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – Today, Governor Rick Scott released the following statement on this morning’s shooting in Orlando. https://twitter.com/FLGovScott/status/742024637190537216 Governor Scott … Continue reading →
June 12, 2016 181 Replies

[Joshua01]

There was no shooting, there are no dead, there is no blood. This was all a big lie...like our government....a big lie

[PatColo]

and then the “victims” are dropped once they think they are out of camera range, WTF???

30 secs
https://youtube.com/watch?v=IaNewsknuBw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaNewsknuBw

[Joshua01]

This does NOT look like what a gunshot wound should look like


https://youtu.be/IaNewsknuBw?t=10