The last Independence Day celebration

[EE_]

If Hillary wins, we will soon be under UN rule. If there is a revolt, don't think for a second that Hillary won't bring in UN troops.

If you can't support Trump, you will get what you deserve, destruction of our country and an American Revolution fought for nothing.

Enjoy today, next year this holiday may be banned.

Today is a day commemorating the adoption of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, by the Continental Congress declaring that the thirteen American colonies regarded themselves as a new nation, the United States of America, and no longer part of the British Empire.

Happy Independence Day...the last one we'll celebrate?


THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION STATISTICS

Total American battle casualties in the Revolutionary War: 6,824 (estimates range between this figure and 4,435; some 90% of them came from the Continental Army)

Ratio of American deaths to the free white male population (aged sixteen to 45) who served in the war: 1 in 20 (this would be the equivalent of about 3 million people today)

Total Americans wounded in the Revolutionary War: 8,445

Total American deaths from disease in the Revolutionary War: 10,000 (approximation)

Total Americans who died in British prisons in the Revolutionary War: 8,500

Total Americans captured in the Revolutionary War: 18,152

[Joshua01]

If Hillary wins, we will soon be under UN rule. If there is a revolt, don't think for a second that Hillary won't bring in UN troops.

If you can't support Trump, you will get what you deserve, destruction of our country and an American Revolution fought for nothing.

Enjoy today, next year this holiday may be banned.

Today is a day commemorating the adoption of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, by the Continental Congress declaring that the thirteen American colonies regarded themselves as a new nation, the United States of America, and no longer part of the British Empire.

Happy Independence Day...the last one we'll celebrate!

I have no illusions. This is indeed a very important time in American history. If Hillary wins the progressives have won and will now own the country. Yes, ther will be riots, and blood and killing. Very soon it will be much different in American than it is now. Men will be armed in the streets, behind trees and buildings. The whole shitshow is beginning

[EE_]

I have no illusions. This is indeed a very important time in American history. If Hillary wins the progressives have won and will now own the country. Yes, ther will be riots, and blood and killing. Very soon it will be much different in American than it is now. Men will be armed in the streets, behind trees and buildings. The whole shitshow is beginning

Before the bloodfest can begin, a revolt must be started to bring about a crisis. How do you think it can begin? Run the banks, stop paying taxes?

With so many tough liberal feminist women today, won't they be armed in the streets, behind trees and buildings too?
I guess we'll see how feminism plays out in a revolution. My guess is these feminists won't be quick to step up and fight to their death.

[Joshua01]

My guess is these feminists won't be quick to step up and fight to their death.

We'll have to hunt them down like dogs, but we'll find them!

[Shami-Amourae]

If Hillary wins, we will soon be under UN rule. If there is a revolt, don't think for a second that Hillary won't bring in UN troops.

If you can't support Trump, you will get what you deserve, destruction of our country and an American Revolution fought for nothing.


People thought it was over when Obama was elected. What happened is more White people who were Leftists became Right-wing (myself included). I was a Leftist when Obama was elected, but it quickly turned me Right-wing.

Young White people who are SJWs right now do, and can wake up. When they do they are way more hardcore than anyone on this forum. They will make the White Nationalism of National Socialism look like childs play. They understand the lies of Cultural Marxism the best, and will fight harder than anyone else.

It's mostly White people who vote still, and the only reason Progressives have been winning is such a large chunk of our people are traitors against their own interests so they can status signal on Facebook what great people they are. Increasingly they can't do that because White people are hated all over now, even if they White Knight for shitskins. It's never enough. This increasingly is sinking in for Whites.

All I'm saying is if Hillary wins, don't lose hope. It does put us at a shorter time-scale for our ultimate demise, but it will also be an easier environment to red pill.

I think the next Hitler has already been born, but is too young to do anything yet. Your job is to do whatever you can to make White people more tribal and racial realist. That's the only way we can save ourselves, civilization, and ultimately get Libertarian ideals at the end of the day, since shitskins will always have their hand out for GibsMeDat, and demand a larger government to steal from White people.

[monty]

Happy Independence Day! Don't give up hope, continue with your battles to open peoples eyes . . . . . More and more people are beginning to see something is wrong

[Down1]

No need for the UN.
The US Tranny/Evangelicuck/mud army will do the job happily.

[EE_]

People thought it was over when Obama was elected. What happened is more White people who were Leftists became Right-wing (myself included). I was a Leftist when Obama was elected, but it quickly turned me Right-wing.

Young White people who are SJWs right now do, and can wake up. When they do they are way more hardcore than anyone on this forum. They will make the White Nationalism of National Socialism look like childs play. They understand the lies of Cultural Marxism the best, and will fight harder than anyone else.

It's mostly White people who vote still, and the only reason Progressives have been winning is such a large chunk of our people are traitors against their own interests so they can status signal on Facebook what great people they are. Increasingly they can't do that because White people are hated all over now, even if they White Knight for shitskins. It's never enough. This increasingly is sinking in for Whites.

All I'm saying is if Hillary wins, don't lose hope. It does put us at a shorter time-scale for our ultimate demise, but it will also be an easier environment to red pill.

I think the next Hitler has already been born, but is too young to do anything yet. Your job is to do whatever you can to make White people more tribal and racial realist. That's the only way we can save ourselves, civilization, and ultimately get Libertarian ideals at the end of the day, since shitskins will always have their hand out for GibsMeDat, and demand a larger government to steal from White people.

If the witch wins, I expect critical mass reached with illegal's/refugees (parasitic breeders), pretty quickly. They will be loyal democrats for life.

[EE_]

No need for the UN.
The US Tranny/Evangelicuck/mud army will do the job happily.

It's a damn disgrace to see our military subjected to gays and transgenders!

[monty]

Gotta love the First Lady !!

Michelle Obama reminded attendees of a Naturalization Ceremony Wednesday that the Founding Fathers weren't born in America. The ceremony for 50 new U.S. citizens was held at the National Archives in Washington , D.C.

She said during her speech, referring to the Declaration of Independence, "It's amazing that just a few feet from here where I'm standing are the signatures of the 56 Founders who put their names on a Declaration that changed the course of history, and like the 50 of you, none of them were born American - they became American."

Excuse me? Did she actually mean that those who signed the Declaration of Independence and participated in the drafting of the Constitution were not born in America?

Benjamin Franklin was born in Pennsylvania.
Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and James Madison were born in Virginia.
John Adams was born in Massachusetts.
Only eight of the 56 were not born in America. Surely she knew this.

But, then again, maybe not. After all, she is a Harvard graduate. Isn't she?

As John Wayne said .... "Life's tough. It's tougher when you're stupid."

And by the way, THE CONSTITUTION WAS NOT SIGNED IN WASHINGTON D.C.! It was signed in Philadelphia!

I guess it's true, you just can't fix stupid !!


\uu\

[Joshua01]

It doesn't matter what the truth is, the sheep believe what they're told

[singular_me]

sorry was there any independence day at all... ??? britain was never defeated

realistically, the founding fathers lost because they were unable to teach their people the masonic esoteric root of evil


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr5ZZj7mOQU

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iur/?f=1&image_host=http%3A%2F%2F2012patriot.files.wordpres s.com%2F2011%2F11%2F3-sister-cities-trinity.jpg&u=https://2012patriot.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/3-sister-cities-trinity.jpg

[EE_]

Gotta love the First Lady !!

Michelle Obama reminded attendees of a Naturalization Ceremony Wednesday that the Founding Fathers weren't born in America. The ceremony for 50 new U.S. citizens was held at the National Archives in Washington , D.C.

She said during her speech, referring to the Declaration of Independence, "It's amazing that just a few feet from here where I'm standing are the signatures of the 56 Founders who put their names on a Declaration that changed the course of history, and like the 50 of you, none of them were born American - they became American."

Excuse me? Did she actually mean that those who signed the Declaration of Independence and participated in the drafting of the Constitution were not born in America?

Benjamin Franklin was born in Pennsylvania.
Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and James Madison were born in Virginia.
John Adams was born in Massachusetts.
Only eight of the 56 were not born in America. Surely she knew this.

But, then again, maybe not. After all, she is a Harvard graduate. Isn't she?

As John Wayne said .... "Life's tough. It's tougher when you're stupid."

And by the way, THE CONSTITUTION WAS NOT SIGNED IN WASHINGTON D.C.! It was signed in Philadelphia!

I guess it's true, you just can't fix stupid !!


\uu\



I don't think it's a matter of being stupid...it's pushing a false narrative to keep the sheeple in the dark. I bet most millennials haven't a clue what Independence day is, or that there was an American Revolution. They think it's an alien movie staring Will Smith.

I've noticed the media stations stay away from talking about the American REVOLUTION and how so many Americans died to win our independence from England.

The problem imo, is the word REVOLUTION...the elite and the government do not want people to even have the thought of that in their minds.

Instead, I see military guys on the talmudvision being honored for fighting in Afghanistan. I guess to divert the real history from the ignorant.
I bet it's not taught in schools anymore either.

[Joshua01]

sorry was there any independence day at all... ??? britain was never defeated

realistically, the founding fathers lost because they were unable to teach their people the masonic esoteric root of evil


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr5ZZj7mOQU

https://images.duckduckgo.com/iur/?f=1&image_host=http%3A%2F%2F2012patriot.files.wordpres s.com%2F2011%2F11%2F3-sister-cities-trinity.jpg&u=https://2012patriot.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/3-sister-cities-trinity.jpg

I noticed it's been all the rage to trash on the founding fathers. Of course this is because the progressives and TPTB want to destroy history. The founding fathers weren't angels. They were slave owners, drunks and womanizers. All they really did was build a country based on freedom and rights for its citizens. But go ahead and keep trashing them. I'm sure a few of them slept with little boys. You should use that one....very effective

[monty]

I don't think it's a matter of being stupid...it's pushing a false narrative to keep the sheeple in the dark. I bet most millennials haven't a clue what Independence day is, or that there was an American Revolution. They think it's an alien movie staring Will Smith.

I've noticed the media stations stay away from talking about the American REVOLUTION and how so many Americans died to win our independence from England.

The problem imo, is the word REVOLUTION...the elite and the government do not want people to even have the thought of that in their minds.

Instead, I see military guys on the talmudvision being honored for fighting in Afghanistan. I guess to divert the real history from the ignorant.
I bet it's not taught in schools anymore either.

I believe you are correct in that she is pushing the false narrative. And your assumption it is not taught in schools anymore is probably 100% correct. The young people today have no idea what "Independence Day" is nor can they name any of the founders. The dumbing down is complete.

[Cebu_4_2]

I believe you are correct in that she is pushing the false narrative. And your assumption it is not taught in schools anymore is probably 100% correct. The young people today have no idea what "Independence Day" is nor can they name any of the founders. The dumbing down is complete.


My son graduated skool a few years back and I just asked him what Independance day was and also about the revolutionary war was about... big blank. So yes it's not taught any longer and we are in the south.

Edit: He did not know that Independance day was the 4th of July! I asked what is the 4th of July celebrated for, again a big blank.

[Horn]

My last Independence Day was somewhere in the early 90's.

I realized then I was tied in someway or other to a lifetime lifeline of FRNs or any debt/bill to society's cultura would never receive a PAID stamp.

It were just fireworks from China or Mexico Day from there forward.

[EE_]

AWR Hawkins: Without Armed Militia Members, No Victory in American Revolution
by BREITBART NEWS3 Jul 2016111

During Breitbart News Daily’s Fourth of July Special, Breitbart’s Dr. AWR Hawkins discussed the indispensability of armed militia members, coupled with the irregular tactics of theirs militias, in regards to victory in the American Revolution.
He also described the way the militia complimented George Washington’s Continental Army and the important lessons the militia has to offer on gun ownership.

Host Stephen K. Bannon directed the conversation toward how the American Revolution was fought “and the concept of militias.” He pointed out that militias were popular in the minds of some 18th century military leaders, not popular in the minds of others. Yet it is inarguable that the militias won the war as it “turned down to the South.”

He then asked Hawkins to explain the difference between “what the militia was and what the Continental Army was.”

Hawkins responded:

Regarding the difference between the Continental Army and the militia we just need to remember that the militia is a very local organization from its start; it goes through various cycles from the 1600s to the time of the revolutionary war–the American Revolution. It was local throughout its history while the Continental Army was, as it sounds, national.

The Continental Army was under George Washington and was more organized–I should say, more militarized, by which I mean better disciplined in the type of military tactics they used.

In the militia you’re going to have a lot of hit and run tactics, a lot of what we refer to as guerrilla warfare. So the militia gave the British fits. Instead of lining up against them as a regular army–like the Continental Army would–you have the militia coming in behind, coming in beside, taking a hit then running. Ambushes and different things. Shooting at officers instead of shooting at rank and file. In short, doing what they had to do to win.

Audio: The American Revolution Special - Dr. AWR Hawkins - July 3, 2016 http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/03/militias-american-revolution/

Bannon referenced asymmetric warfare–the type of warfare evidenced by militia methodology–emphasizing too how that type of warfare presented the British with something other than what they expected.

Hawkins observed:

It is important to note as well that Washington used this type of warfare when advantageous. Whether he learned it from the militias I cannot say. But in the North, when the battles in New York were taking place, he would use that type of warfare too: a quick hit, then back up, while they’re not ready, another quick hit, back up. Not with his full army, but only with this detachment or that one.

So he was successful with that tactic too, but that was an exception to his rule. For the militia, that was the overarching rule.

And the militia was hard to spot. The way they dressed meant a member of the militia looked just the farmer who wasn’t a member of the militia. A member of the militia looked just like the Loyalist who wasn’t a member of the militia. A member of the militia was not someone that the British could spot when they rolled into a town, so they never knew who’d they had angered and who they hadn’t. They never knew who was fighting for independence and who wasn’t. And this gave the militia the upper hand.

Bannon then pointed to the “grit” and fortitude of the citizen soldiers; of the members of the militias who fought the British in the South. Hawkins responded by pointing to David Hackett Fischer’s book Albion’s Seed–particularly Fischer’s overview of the types of people that settled the southern colonies, their origins on the edges of society in Europe.

Hawkins stressed that these were people who came from parts of Europe where they had to defend themselves and their families–they had to administer justice or justice would not be administered. As the British moved through the South they trampled the crops of these people, burned the homes of these people, and drew the indignation of these people as well.

Bannon then asked Hawkins if there is a direct connection between the where we are today–regarding the focus on the importance on gun rights–and where the colonists were in 1776, 1777, 1778, etc.

Hawkins said:

There such is a connection. If those militia members had not had weapons, if an individual militia member had not had his weapon to come together with other militia members, then what good would they have been?

George Washington put his finger on this after his success at the end of 1776, and he basically became successful only at the very end of 1776. Even after that he pointed out that the British ultimately didn’t have to defeat colonists. Rather, they had to defeat the colonists’ arms. And that’s what stood in the way of the British in the late 1700s and that’s what stands in the way of tyrants here, in the 21st century. That connection is unbreakable.

It is easy to see. It’s a consistent thread to through American history. And our Founders hedged in gun rights for that reason.

As long as the tyrants have to overcome not simply the people, but the people’s arms, then freedom is safe.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/03/militias-american-revolution/

[EE_]

End of Independence Day

The 4th of July should be a day of historic retrospection. For a proper understanding into the significance of the birth of the nation, start with an examination of the perennial

BREAKING ALL THE RULES essay, The Meaning of Independence Day. Then contrast our circumstances and heritage in the article - Independence Day for Whom? Both of these columns are essential. If one forgets from where, how and why our country was created, it is impossible to appreciate the uniqueness of the American Revolution and the meaning of the "shot heard ‘round the world".

A provoking account of The Original and Real Cause of the American Revolution - What They Really Fought For, presents the following historical story, taken from a radio address given by Congressman Charles G. Binderup of Nebraska, some 50 years ago and reprinted in Unrobing the Ghosts of Wall Street:　

Before the American War for Independence in 1776, the colonized part of what is today the United States of America was a possession of England. It was called New England, and was made up of 13 colonies, which became the first 13 states of the great Republic. Around 1750, this New England was very prosperous. Benjamin Franklin was able to write:

"There was abundance in the Colonies, and peace was reigning on every border. It was difficult, and even impossible, to find a happier and more prosperous nation on all the surface of the globe. Comfort was prevailing in every home. The people, in general, kept the highest moral standards, and education was widely spread."　

When Benjamin Franklin went over to England to represent the interests of the Colonies, he saw a completely different situation: the working population of this country was gnawed by hunger and poverty. "The streets are covered with beggars and tramps," he wrote. He asked his English friends how England, with all its wealth, could have so much poverty among its working classes.

His friends replied that England was a prey to a terrible condition: it had too many workers! The rich said they were already overburdened with taxes, and could not pay more to relieve the needs and poverty of this mass of workers. Several rich Englishmen of that time actually believed, along with Mathus, that wars and plague were necessary to rid the country from man-power surpluses.

Franklin's friends then asked him how the American Colonies managed to collect enough money to support their poor houses, and how they could overcome this plague of pauperism. Franklin replied:

"We have no poor houses in the Colonies; and if we had some, there would be nobody to put in them, since there is, in the Colonies, not a single unemployed person, neither beggars nor tramps."　

His friends could not believe their ears, and even less understand this fact, since when the English poor houses and jails became too cluttered, England shipped these poor wretches and down-and- outs, like cattle, and discharged, on the quays of the Colonies, those who had survived the poverty, dirtiness and privations of the journey. At that time, England was throwing into jail those who could not pay their debts. They therefore asked Franklin how he could explain the remarkable prosperity of the New England Colonies. Franklin replied:

"That is simple. In the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. It is called 'Colonial Scrip.' We issue it in proper proportion to make the goods pass easily from the producers to the consumers. 　 In this manner, creating ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power and we have no interest to pay to no one."　

The central struggle that has plagued the fledgling country between true independence and a spin off version of British mercantilism has persisted since 1776. In the beginning: Let there be the Articles of Confederation presents the background on the fundamental reason for fighting the American Revolution; namely, independence - the essence of Inherent Autonomy. The Articles of Confederation was Preferable argues, "Only a systemic dismantling of that central government, returning primacy back to individual states will restore the vision of the American Revolution".

The conflict between the Federalists supremacy of Alexander Hamilton and the vision of Thomas Jefferson’s Revolution, has continued to this day. "Jefferson’s passion for a restrained central government was a core principle foreseen as a primary reason for separation from England. His concept of an independent and self-reliant society was abandoned with the rush to regiment a flawed national identity".

Deplorably, the Federalists took control and forced their replica model of central government despotism upon a disjointed society. Andrew Jackson is an America hero because he opposed a fiat currency, issued by a National Bank, and an all-powerful central government. Compare his legacy to the archetype tyrant Abraham Lincoln.

The brilliant thinker, Thomas DiLorenzo in his account, Why Neocons Are Freaking Out Over Lincoln, makes a contemporary analogy that illustrates the betrayal of the spirit of the American Revolution. The conquest of vicious tyranny, institutionalized with the union victory in the "War of Northern Aggression", has ruled ever since.

"One of the clearest examples of the importance the neocons assign to the Lincoln legend in supporting never-ending war is a small book by an American Enterprise Institute neocon named Walter Berns. His book is entitled Making Patriots. In an important chapter on Lincoln mythology Berns bemoans the fact that too many of today’s youth are too hesitant to join in the neocons’ crusades to overthrow governments in place like Syria, Lebanon, Iran, North Korea, and elsewhere. They are too selfish and self-centered, says Berns, being so preoccupied with their own education, careers, and families. They must be mesmerized into the fascist/neocon militaristic mindset by some kind of "national poet," says Walter Berns. "Fortunately," he says, we already have such a "poet" in the political rhetoric of Abraham Lincoln. "Making Cannon Fodder" would thus be a more appropriate title for Berns’ book."

The egomaniacal presidencies of Theodore Roosevelt, Woodward Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt, all fermented an internationalist empire, is the antithesis of the original purpose of the founding of the country.

Independence is dead, because the nation is no longer a republic of sovereign states. Even those who dismiss the superiority of the Articles of Confederation and proclaim primary allegiance to the U.S. Constitution must concede that the "Bill of Rights" no longer exists.

In its place is a system of bureaucratic treason dominated by the power of fiat debt money. That "happier and more prosperous nation on all the surface of the globe" now reduced to a society where "The streets are covered with beggars and tramps", has no sensible reason to celebrate the imperium regime.

The End of Independence Day is upon us. However, our solemnization of the American Revolution remains.

The traditional conservative America First populism that is our heritage goes unheeded by most citizenry. It seems illogical that people will continually endorse or even give rudimentary support to a system that is lethally hostile to individual liberty. Nonetheless, that is exactly the state of affairs that we live underneath, with no reasonable expectation of altering constitutionally.

Independence, both personal and juristically are tagged as terrorist defiance. Accountability of arrogant autocrats goes unpunished.

An American Renaissance Revolution is the solution. "In order to fulfill the objectives of 1776, the original conflict must finish the task that was never completed. Western Civilization is worth saving. Our true cultural heritage must survive. And secular humanism needs to be cast into the pit of hell fire."
Can you afford many more years of betrayal? The 1776 declaration stands for liberty.

The commentary, No Despotism - Only Independence espouses the case for self-rule.
"The answer to defeat despotism is found in the revelation of INDEPENDENCE. While not a perfect guarantee for victory or a formula to replace a fallen human nature; autonomy among your own similar kind, is the inherent right for governance. Independence is the antidote to despotic corruption. Relief from mob lunacy, under the domination of gangster direction, is found in the model of an authentic Republic."

Regular readers are familiar with numerous examples of government subversion. Any bystander intuitively knows that the system no longer works for the average American. However, countless citizens still want to cheer for a government that long ago forfeited any legitimacy. How strange a society that champions wars and plague as necessary to rid the country from man-power surpluses. What has changed among the Lordly elites from the colonial era?

It is ironic that Congressman Charles G. Binderup emigrated with his parents from Denmark, understood the nature of the American experience, while legions of government-schooled clones are so clueless.
The globalists that control the political apparatus are dedicated anti-liberty fascists. The corporatists of today are English Crown Tory descendants, no matter their origin. The death lyric of independence is the choir in the requiem hymn of the Republic. Ben Franklin’s jubilate assessment, has witnessed the methodical destruction of the spirit of Independence Day with each succeeding year.

SARTRE – June 30, 2013

http://batr.org/reactionary/063013.html

[monty]

My son graduated skool a few years back and I just asked him what Independance day was and also about the revolutionary war was about... big blank. So yes it's not taught any longer and we are in the south.

Edit: He did not know that Independance day was the 4th of July! I asked what is the 4th of July celebrated for, again a big blank.

Watch this video, there will be little doubt about them teaching the current generation about the Revolutionary War, Independence Day or anything connected. .


http://youtu.be/2-Be9f7Ovgg

https://youtu.be/2-Be9f7Ovgg

[monty]

Happy Independence Day

http://www.sonofthesouth.net/revolutionary-war/documents/declaration-of-independence.jpg

[crimethink]

Happy Independence Day



Sorry to be the party pooper, but I wish there was something to celebrate.

We are an occupied country.

[monty]

Sorry to be the party pooper, but I wish there was something to celebrate.

We are an occupied country.

How many of you had to memorize the Preamble to the Constitution when you were in school like I did?

Teach your kids and grand kids. The communist schools aren't going to.

[Ares]

Sorry to be the party pooper, but I wish there was something to celebrate.

We are an occupied country.

My neighbor who is still an active Marine asked why I didn't have a flag or bought any fireworks to celebrate. (He knows I'm also former military). I said because I refuse to celebrate something that I do not have. I am taxed, regulated, free speech prohibited and shunned for my skin color. (I'm a white male).

I said why would I celebrate my "freedom" when I do not have any? I have no freedom of association, no freedom of speech, and I'm only as free as the government and courts say that I am. If I stop paying my property taxes because I don't agree with how the county uses them I'll be evicted from my home by the courts, ruined due to the costs, and have my property seized to pay any back taxes.

I said America is a lot of things to a lot of people, but unfortunately freedom isn't one of them and hasn't been since the civil war.

He turned around and walked away without a word to say.

[monty]

My neighbor who is still an active Marine asked why I didn't have a flag or bought any fireworks to celebrate. (He knows I'm also former military). I said because I refuse to celebrate something that I do not have. I am taxed, regulated, free speech prohibited and shunned for my skin color. (I'm a white male).

I said why would I celebrate my "freedom" when I do not have any? I have no freedom of association, no freedom of speech, and I'm only as free as the government and courts say that I am. If I stop paying my property taxes because I don't agree with how the county uses them I'll be evicted from my home by the courts, ruined due to the costs, and have my property seized to pay any back taxes.

I said America is a lot of things to a lot of people, but unfortunately freedom isn't one of them and hasn't been since the civil war.

He turned around and walked away without a word to say.

What you say is true. If the younger generation is not taught our history and that the founding documents are the law they will be worse off than you are.

How many people realize the ABC agencies get their power from treaties that are supposedly the 'supreme law of the land'?

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding."

"and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; What is this stating? Who or what is the Authority of the United States?

The 'Authority of the United States' is not the three branches of government nor is it the President who signed the treaty or the Senators who ratified the treaty.

The 'Authority of the United States' is the Constitution that created the United States. Therefore, any treaty must conform to the limits of the Constitution. Any part of a treaty that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void. Any President who signs or Senator who votes to ratify such a treaty is guilty of violating his oath of office.

if the general populace was educatated and understood the Constitution the EPA would not be running around the country imprisoning men for building ponds on their private property. The FBI wouldn't be ambushing and killing innocent Americans.

That is my 4th of July message. But I am only one small voice in a sea of socialism.

[Ares]

What you say is true. If the younger generation is not taught our history and that the founding documents are the law they will be worse off than you are.

How many people realize the ABC agencies get their power from treaties that are supposedly the 'supreme law of the land'?

"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding."

"and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; What is this stating? Who or what is the Authority of the United States?

The 'Authority of the United States' is not the three branches of government nor is it the President who signed the treaty or the Senators who ratified the treaty.

The 'Authority of the United States' is the Constitution that created the United States. Therefore, any treaty must conform to the limits of the Constitution. Any part of a treaty that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void. Any President who signs or Senator who votes to ratify such a treaty is guilty of violating his oath of office.

if the general populace was educatated and understood the Constitution the EPA would not be running around the country imprisoning men for building ponds on their private property. The FBI wouldn't be ambushing and killing innocent Americans.

That is my 4th of July message. But I am only one small voice in a sea of socialism.

Agreed 100%, my oldest daughter will be starting 1st grade. She's already extremely inquisitive (I hope she got that from me. ), and I'll be doing what I can to supplement her education and have her question authority, and to instill in her that governments any government for that matter is not to be trusted.

[EE_]

Agreed 100%, my oldest daughter will be starting 1st grade. She's already extremely inquisitive (I hope she got that from me. ), and I'll be doing what I can to supplement her education and have her question authority, and to instill in her that governments any government for that matter is not to be trusted.

I see problems coming for your daughters school when you get involved with her education. They're not going to like you!

Ares at the principals office
https://michaelhyatt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/iStock_000011854358Small.jpg

[crimethink]

How many of you had to memorize the Preamble to the Constitution when you were in school like I did?

Teach your kids and grand kids. The communist schools aren't going to.

I taught my kids about the Declaration and the Bill of Rights. The Constitution, not so much.

[crimethink]

He turned around and walked away without a word to say.

You got lucky, or, he's really a decent, but naive, man. I've had veteran worshipers get ready to assault me for telling them the truth.

[crimethink]

if the general populace was educatated and understood the Constitution the EPA would not be running around the country imprisoning men for building ponds on their private property. The FBI wouldn't be ambushing and killing innocent Americans.


Of course they would be! "Education" is not the problem. Again, education is NOT the problem.

Lack of will is the problem. Most people know that much or most of what the government does is immoral if not unlawful and anti-constitutional.

The Founders took up arms and used deadly force on "the authorities" for much, much less than we are subjected to.



But I am only one small voice in a sea of socialism.

And there's another problem, stupidity, drawing from the "conservative" Jewsmedia and Kosher agit-prop entities like the (((Austrian))) school. "Socialism." Bullshit. The problem was, is, and will remain Jewish Capitalism. The mission of amassing maximized wealth by whatever means are necessary. "Capitalism" means what it says: the amassing of capital (property). The Constitution was steamrolled over the Articles because of Capitalism, and, the imperial powers of the Federal regime go back to the idolized Constitution. The Bill of Rights slowed down empire, but couldn't stop it (largely because the dear Constitution gave virtually unchecked power to the SCROTUS).

The Armed Forces don't protect "socialism."

"Law enforcement" doesn't protect "socialism."

They protect property, and, specifically, of wealthy individuals and wealthy corporations. Your life and your property? LOL - "no obligation" to do that, per the SCROTUS.

[crimethink]

I see problems coming for your daughters school when you get involved with her education. They're not going to like you!

Ares at the principals office
https://michaelhyatt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/iStock_000011854358Small.jpg

Doing the right thing is not always easy, and often, is very hard or even dangerous.

The administration didn't like us, and was glad when our kids graduated. Whenever my wife showed up at the office, it was "oh, shit, not her again." My most enjoyable moment was invoking the personal beliefs exemption for vaccinations. The tool school nurse tried to tell me we "had to" use their form, which was a legal admission to child abuse, to invoke it. I told her, "uh, no, that's not what the law says." The principal didn't want a legal fight and ordered her to back down.

[monty]

Of course they would be! "Education" is not the problem. Again, education is NOT the problem.

Lack of will is the problem. Most people know that much or most of what the government does is immoral if not unlawful and anti-constitutional.

The Founders took up arms and used deadly force on "the authorities" for much, much less than we are subjected to.




And there's another problem, stupidity, drawing from the "conservative" Jewsmedia and Kosher agit-prop entities like the (((Austrian))) school. "Socialism." Bullshit. The problem was, is, and will remain Jewish Capitalism. The mission of amassing maximized wealth by whatever means are necessary. "Capitalism" means what it says: the amassing of capital (property). The Constitution was steamrolled over the Articles because of Capitalism, and, the imperial powers of the Federal regime go back to the idolized Constitution. The Bill of Rights slowed down empire, but couldn't stop it (largely because the dear Constitution gave virtually unchecked power to the SCROTUS).

The Armed Forces don't protect "socialism."

"Law enforcement" doesn't protect "socialism."

They protect property, and, specifically, of wealthy individuals and wealthy corporations. Your life and your property? LOL - "no obligation" to do that, per the SCROTUS.

What is socialism if it is not Marxist Communism, Jewish Capitalism? Who is defending the armed forces and law enforcement? I am not. The government pushes socialistic welfare because it is easier to control people.

Maybe I am confusing the terms.

One reason people don't have the will is because they get their living from the federal government either by employment or in the form of gib me dats. They don't want to rock the boat.

[Ares]

You got lucky, or, he's really a decent, but naive, man. I've had veteran worshipers get ready to assault me for telling them the truth.

I've got a pretty good neighbor relationship with him. But I think it may of opened an eye or 2, as he kind of sat on his porch for a while after that. I'm sure thinking about what he was just told. Maybe it will start his search towards the truth. Who knows?

[Cebu_4_2]

Doing the right thing is not always easy, and often, is very hard or even dangerous.

The administration didn't like us, and was glad when our kids graduated. Whenever my wife showed up at the office, it was "oh, shit, not her again." My most enjoyable moment was invoking the personal beliefs exemption for vaccinations. The tool school nurse tried to tell me we "had to" use their form, which was a legal admission to child abuse, to invoke it. I told her, "uh, no, that's not what the law says." The principal didn't want a legal fight and ordered her to back down.

Only option here is religious exemption. Take the kid in for a physical before school and tell the doc, they check a box and that's it. The school can bitch all they want but that little box checked is all that's needed.

[Ares]

Only option here is religious exemption. Take the kid in for a physical before school and tell the doc, they check a box and that's it. The school can bitch all they want but that little box checked is all that's needed.

In the state I live in, you go down to the Health and Human Services department. Read the form about "The Risks of not vaccinating" sign it, and they give you the exemption forms. That's it.

[crimethink]

What is socialism if it is not Marxist Communism, Jewish Capitalism?


"Socialism" is a canard used by Capitalists to imply the little people are the fault of the world's sorrows. "Socialized medicine," "welfare burden," blah, buh, blah, buh, blah. Never mind the usurious, debt-based, sorcery-driven "financial system" is the root cause of the vast majority of the world's problems, including unpayable debt.

Socialism, a society where all of the people of the nation are considered valuable and all the resources of the nation used solely for their benefit, has not been achieved. The Third Reich came close prior to the outbreak of the war.

The only true socialist society would/will be one based on Christian principles; some of the Christian socialist parties have advocated workable systems (as has Social Credit).

All of the Marxist "socialist" societies were/are state Capitalist societies, created, funded, and sustained by their supposed "enemies" of the Capitalist "free world."




Who is defending the armed forces and law enforcement? I am not.


I didn't say you were, and I'm sorry it may have seemed I was. I was only pointing out that the "security" apparatus of these "free societies" do not protect the little folks ("socialism"), but solely the property of the wealthy, including artificial "persons" (corporations).

We never hear about "socialized military" or "socialized police services," even though they are morally identical to any other "socialist" (e.g., welfare) enterprise of the ruling system. The reason? The rich depend upon those "socialized" systems. Warmonger and bankster stooge Thatcher's cute little maxim is something I love to turn around: "endless warfare and 'security' is great until you run out of other peoples' money."




The government pushes socialistic welfare because it is easier to control people.


Rosenfeld's Social Security Act of 1935 was a copy of the National Socialist German welfare system (which was built atop Bismarck's own welfare system), and was created solely to stave off the threat of possible nationalist-populist revolution in America. The SSA is the beginning of not only Social Security (Title II), but unemployment benefits (Title III), TANF (previously, AFDC; Title IV), and SNAP (previously Food Stamps; the name comes from that era; Title IV-VI). These are highly-beneficial services to anyone who needs to use them, and they work just fine in a society where garbage is not allowed to build up (Niggers, Wiggers, and similar).




One reason people don't have the will is because they get their living from the federal government either by employment or in the form of gib me dats. They don't want to rock the boat.

The vast majority of people who have the means to bring down the system are either government employees, were government employees, or are dependent upon governments (all three categories include all veterans who receive even a penny of benefit from the DOD or VA). As for people loving the government because they're on welfare, that's generally not the case. We know a large percentage of welfare dependents are criminals, who have no problem shooting their own kind, but are generally afraid of the police and other "authorities" (yet they hate them, and join in BLM bullshit and similar). The issue is lack of will again, or, explicitly, cowardice.

[crimethink]

Only option here is religious exemption. Take the kid in for a physical before school and tell the doc, they check a box and that's it. The school can bitch all they want but that little box checked is all that's needed.

The Excremento Criminals took away the exemption about a year ago. Thank God our kids are beyond this crap. But I'm waiting for the needle to be made mandatory for anyone using "health insurance" or the "health care system" in general, no matter if private or public benefit. All it will take is one "epidemic" that takes out a million or so people, and then the vast majority will shriek for "the authorities" to "save" them. Just like the TSA and USA "PATRIOT" Act after 9/11.

In fact, the "legal" mechanism already exists for the Federal regime to force adults to take the needle.

[crimethink]

In the state I live in, you go down to the Health and Human Services department. Read the form about "The Risks of not vaccinating" sign it, and they give you the exemption forms. That's it.

That form is similar to the California State form I refused to sign. Signing it is an admission of child abuse (their definition). I imagine it's written just like the one here, with absolutist terminology, not "most experts believe" but "experts have proven not taking the needle is dangerous for your child." And the nurse wouldn't let me cross anything off (I could, but she wouldn't accept it), which is why it escalated as it did for us.

[Ares]

That form is similar to the California State form I refused to sign. Signing it is an admission of child abuse (their definition). I imagine it's written just like the one here, with absolutist terminology, not "most experts believe" but "experts have proven not taking the needle is dangerous for your child." And the nurse wouldn't let me cross anything off (I could, but she wouldn't accept it), which is why it escalated as it did for us.

It may of been, from what I can remember it was something along the lines of you've been informed of the risks involved in not vaccinating, but are declaring and requesting a religious exemption. I'll have to sign one again as I have a 3rd on the way (finally getting a boy. :) ) I'll take a picture of the form next time.

[crimethink]

It may of been, from what I can remember it was something along the lines of you've been informed of the risks involved in not vaccinating, but are declaring and requesting a religious exemption. I'll have to sign one again as I have a 3rd on the way (finally getting a boy. :) ) I'll take a picture of the form next time.

I hope to God it's never used against you. But on a happier note, congratulations, Daddy!

[Neuro]

The Excremento Criminals took away the exemption about a year ago. Thank God our kids are beyond this crap. But I'm waiting for the needle to be made mandatory for anyone using "health insurance" or the "health care system" in general, no matter if private or public benefit. All it will take is one "epidemic" that takes out a million or so people, and then the vast majority will shriek for "the authorities" to "save" them. Just like the TSA and USA "PATRIOT" Act after 9/11.

In fact, the "legal" mechanism already exists for the Federal regime to force adults to take the needle.

It will happen, the unvaxed will be blamed, it will be the next witch hunt. Already the zombies are screaming bloody murder for putting their immunocompromized children's life at risk for not vaccinating, though the only reason they got there was because they had every recommended shot, had been on multiple antibiotic treatments before the age of two, and they fed them crap and they were never outside playing. But it was actually your fault his child became sick and died, because you made active decisions to keep your children healthy!

Witch!

[Neuro]

It may of been, from what I can remember it was something along the lines of you've been informed of the risks involved in not vaccinating, but are declaring and requesting a religious exemption. I'll have to sign one again as I have a 3rd on the way (finally getting a boy. :) ) I'll take a picture of the form next time.

Congratulations Ares!

[Ares]

I hope to God it's never used against you. But on a happier note, congratulations, Daddy!

Same here, which is why I've been extensively researching the Commercial Lien process. I've come to realize it's an extremely potent weapon in legal land.

Thanks for the congrats!

[Ares]

Congratulations Ares!

Thanks, was a little unplanned, but definitely not unwanted. Just unexpected. But all test have come back that he's going to be a healthy baby boy when he arrives and that was the most I was concerned about. :)

[Neuro]

Here a mom with a son, who got autism from a vaccine, puts a medical dr in her place...

https://www.facebook.com/RevolutionForChoice/videos/271389993268594/

[Neuro]

This is what my daughter wrote today in response to this subject.


this is absolutely sick, but isnt this the way we get to any "progress" as a society, or in the form of a societal reform. in this case, just as many others it would be called going backwards instead- but still. to strip people of their daily necessities unless they follow a certain rule. could be applied to for example micro chips placed into everyone. you cant take the bus, you cant go to the dentist, you cant enter your job unless you get this thing that eventually tracks your every movement planted in your body- so what could you possibly do? even if you're a smart, thinking individual you're pushed to do as everyone else. yet i wouldnt know if the question of vaccines actually takes this one step ahead on a scale of bad to horrible- since we're involving parenting and the responsibility of a child handed over to the state. its a simple step taken towards stripping society of its core, the family. several dystopic novels touch the subject of families, and the main thing brought up is often the fact that in such dystopies there in fact are none because the upbringing of children is left to the state. there can't be much variety of thought and intellect if everyone is brought up the same way by the same entity. killing the formation of families is the first and main step to eliminate original (and thus threatening) thoughts.

I am SO proud and happy of what she has become! And she is not even 18 yet.

[monty]

1954 8th grade civics test

http://rense.com/general75/pass.htm

1895 Kansas 8th grade exam

http://grandfather-economic-report.com/1895-test.htm


Questions: What percentage of this year's seniors and last year's high school graduates could pass the following 8th grade test required in 1895, even if the few outdated questions were modernized? How many college students could pass it? For that matter, what percentage of high school teachers could pass it? And - - what percentage of today's schools have standards for promotion from 8th grade equal to or tougher than those required in 1895?
8th Grade Final Exam: Salina, Kansas - 1895

This is the eighth-grade final exam* from 1895 from Salina, Kansas. It was taken
from the original document on file at the Smoky Valley Genealogical Society
and Library in Salina, Kansas and reprinted by the Salina Journal.


edit:
"Someone has attempted to answer the questions on the 1895 school test, and they are posted on the internet at http://www.barefootsworld.net/1895examcomp.html There is an error on the answers. In the math portion of the test. The answer to question number 9 should be 160 acres with a value of $2,400." Shirley George Towner SVGS Salina, KS

[monty]

The Unanimous Declaration of the thirteen States of America ~ From and read by the Florida Convention of States ~ uploaded by J Grady


http://youtu.be/g-SK6OeAe1g

https://youtu.be/g-SK6OeAe1g

[Ares]

1954 8th grade civics test

http://rense.com/general75/pass.htm

1895 Kansas 8th grade exam

http://grandfather-economic-report.com/1895-test.htm



edit: Someone has attempted to answer the questions on the 1895 school test, and they are posted on the internet at http://www.barefootsworld.net/1895examcomp.html There is an error on the answers. In the math portion of the test. The answer to question number 9 should be 160 acres with a value of $2,400." Shirley George Towner SVGS Salina, KS

The moment we let government get involved in educating our children you see the decline of knowledge.

What the government pays for it gets.

[monty]

The moment we let government get involved in educating our children you see the decline of knowledge.

What the government pays for it gets.

Quoted for truth.

[PatColo]

Daaayum! Now I get where the expression "John Hancock" meaning "signature" came from... look at that elegant shite!! :o



Happy Independence Day

http://www.sonofthesouth.net/revolutionary-war/documents/declaration-of-independence.jpg

[monty]

Daaayum! Now I get where the expression "John Hancock" meaning "signature" came from... look at that elegant shite!! :o

in the late 1950's when I took American government in high shool we learned that the colonists referred to King George and/or England as John Bull.

John Hancock was President of the Continental Congress. He was the first to sign the Declaration. When he had signed he proclaimed:

"There! John Bull can read my name without spectacles and may now double his reward of £500 for my head. That is my defiance.”