View Full Version : The Secret Cyberwar is Here
singular_me
11th July 2016, 04:07 PM
man is enslaved to a reptilian brain system (nothing to do with the reptilians here) , a system inducing Fear 24/7 to keep him in absolute survival mode. Anything he does follows this pattern and will push him over the edge eventually? This fear even turns him into an accomplice of his own demise. Human nature ??? Nope, thats a reptilian brain programming. Unlike animals, man can get rid of it... IF HE WANTS TO.
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dangerandplay.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2Freptillian-brain.jpg&f=1
-------------------------
The Secret Cyberwar is Here: Director Alex Gibney on 'Zero Days' Documentary, Stuxnet & Cyberweapons
"The potential for enormous destruction and loss of life is palpable when it comes to cyberweapons," says Alex Gibney, director of the new film Zero Days, which delves into the creation, deployment, and implications of the Stuxnet virus. Stuxnet, a self-replicating cyberweapon launched by the U.S. and Israel into the Natanz nuclear plant in Iran, was an effort to thwart Iran's nuclear progress by taking control of the plant's centrifuges, spinning them until they would explode. "The reason it is hugely significant is it is the first time a computer code has crossed the threshold from the realm of cyber to the realm of the physical. So it is blowing stuff up."
"It was a brilliant and elegant weapon which achieved a goal of slowing down Iran's path to being a nuclear power. However, as a precedent, it was extremely dangerous because it was an attack on critical infrastructure during peacetime. Had that been done to us we would have been within our rights to start a war."
http://reason.com/reasontv/2016/07/08/the-secret-cyberwar-is-here-director-ale
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh-er7BAqVA
https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/stux_dees.jpg
Dogman
11th July 2016, 04:14 PM
Most or nearly so men are programmed due to hormones with a intense desired to return to the womb!
Any way he can l
Never far from his thoughts, despite what he is currently doing at the moment!
Truth !
;D
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Forum runner
EE_
11th July 2016, 04:30 PM
http://blamodesigns.com/wordpress2012/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/male-brain.jpg http://www.warpedandtwisted.com/menwomen/womenbrain.bmp
singular_me
11th July 2016, 04:34 PM
war is immoral, period, along with its apologists
=============================
The New Immoral Age: How Technology Offers New Ways of Killing People and of Destroying the World
11 July 2016 GMT
According to basic humanitarian or humanist morality, as the Auberon Herbert’s quote above illustrates, what is immoral for one individual does not become moral because one million individuals do it, under the cloak of a government or any other umbrella organization. In other words, a head of state or a government cannot enjoy a wider choice of moral rules than the ones that apply to every individual. The agent (the public person) cannot have looser moral rules than the principal (the people). There cannot be one morality for an individual in private life, and another one for an individual acting within a government.
For example, it is widely accepted under basic moral rules that an individual may only use deadly force in self-defense, when his own life or the lives of his family are threatened. Therefore, the delegated morality to a state by its citizens to use deadly force cannot extend beyond the requirements of self-defense against actual or imminent attack, of the maintenance of order, and of the implementation of justice. Any unprovoked act of deadly aggression, resulting in the untimely and extrajudicial death of people, by a head of state, a government or its officials against other people becomes automatically immoral, if not illegal, notwithstanding in what legal mumbo jumbo such an aggression is couched.
It is true that the current chasm between individual and official morality has been long in developing. When the Roman Emperor Theodosius (347-395), in 380, adopted Christianity as its official state religion, it was difficult to apply Jesus Christ’s pacifist and non-violence admonition that “all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword”. Christian theologians such as Augustine of Hippo (354-430) were thus obliged to develop the argument that moral rules designed for individuals did not necessarily apply to an individual becoming an emperor, a king or a head of state who must administer justice or wage wars. In particular, the Commandment “Thou shall not kill” was redefined to exclude heads of state involved in so-called “just wars”, waged by a ‘legitimate authority’. It was spelled out, however, that such wars could not be pre-emptive, but strictly defensive to restore peace. Otherwise, such a war would become immoral.
Nowadays, there is a basic public morality inscribed in the United Nations Charter and in the Nuremberg Charter. The latter clearly prohibits crimes against peace, defined as referring to the “planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression”… A war of aggression is defined as is a military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense, usually for territorial gain and subjugation. The U.N. General Assembly adopted these definitions, on December 11, 1946, as part of customary international law. Such was the core of public morality after World War II.
MORE
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-new-immoral-age-how-technology-offers-new-ways-of-killing-people-and-of-destroying-the-world/5535168
singular_me
11th July 2016, 04:37 PM
the birth trauma is real but I would call this the Fear of Being, metaphysics derived from self responsibility..
willing to go back to the womb is an Freudian and obsolete interpretation.
Most or nearly so men are programmed due to hormones with a intense desired to return to the womb!
Any way he can l
Never far from his thoughts, despite what he is currently doing at the moment!
Truth !
;D
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Forum runner
Dogman
11th July 2016, 04:45 PM
understand, most moms remember some of the pain, but not all of it, the kid not so much other that it got suddenly bright and cold..But at the time newborns did not understand cold or bright, just feelings But for dam sure for some
Some can remember their first personal world shakeups that for most will be forgotten, but for a few dark to light, and warm to cold with a tad of ? only later words are learned to describe very first memorys.
Birth !
singular_me
11th July 2016, 04:50 PM
I stick to what I was explaining: birth trauma = Fear of Being or Cosmic Abandonment ;D
from the mother's womb to the Cosmic and Earth Womb, man belongs to the Universe and because he cannot sense of it, this terrifying thought is so unbearable that he spends his time projecting his own fear around him.
case closed
understand, most moms remember some of the pain, the kid not so much other that it got suddenly bright and cold..But at the time newborns did not understand cold or bright. But for dam sure for some
Some can remember their first personal world shakeups that for most will be forgotten, but for a few dark to light, and warm to cold with a tad of ? only later words are learned to describe very first memorys.
Birth !
Dogman
11th July 2016, 04:54 PM
Maybe for the mom, not so much for the kid, tho most do scream their ass off because screaming is a discovered thing that seems to work, and they screamed their ass of but not a sound was produced before birth with lungs full of amniotic fluid screaming was not an option
But in air screaming was something that seemed to work, so run with it..
;D
Neuro
11th July 2016, 05:24 PM
Fascinating that someone who rejects evolution can post an article about the reptilian brain within humans (and apparently supports it too). You don't really use your neo-cortex much do you Goldie? ;D
singular_me
12th July 2016, 12:22 PM
you will never get it Neuro, I am in between creationism and evolution.... evolution is being stuck at the reptilian thinking level (survival justifies everything), while creationism could/will help overcome darwin. Thats the purpose of being born/meaning of life: to reconcile with the cosmic womb, whatever your race/culture, the journeys are all alike
Fascinating that someone who rejects evolution can post an article about the reptilian brain within humans (and apparently supports it too). You don't really use your neo-cortex much do you Goldie? ;D
singular_me
12th July 2016, 12:25 PM
human systems are all flawed, because the bottom line is: freedom and awareness
---------------------
Antivirus software is 'increasingly useless' and may make your computer less safe
12 July 2016 GMT
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/antivirus-software-1.3668746
Welcoming Our New Algorithmic Overlords?
Algocracy and the moral and political legitimacy of government decision-making
http://reason.com/archives/2016/07/08/welcoming-our-new-algorithmic-overlords
Neuro
12th July 2016, 01:45 PM
you will never get it Neuro, I am in between creationism and evolution.... evolution is being stuck at the reptilian thinking level (survival justifies everything), while creationism could/will help overcome darwin So you are stuck somewhere between reptilian thinking and anti-Darwinism? Doesn't sound very constructive. Maybe that's why you're such a miserable animal?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.