1,300 galaxies spoted in tiny corner of universe by new radio telescope

[midnight rambler]

Only 70 galaxies were thought to be in this tiny corner of the universe, and this radio telescope was only operating at 1/4 power -

https://www.yahoo.com/news/first-image-released-worlds-super-radio-telescope-175305457.html?ref=gs

http://www.ska.ac.za/media/visuals/2016/2016_meerkat_fli_01.png

[madfranks]

Incredible!

[mamboni]

Frickin' hologram

[Glass]

very very small or far far away?


When fully up and running in the 2020s, the SKA will comprise a forest of 3,000 dishes spread over an area of a square kilometre (0.4 square miles) across remote terrain around several countries to allow astronomers to peer deeper into space in unparallelled detail.


It will have a discovery potential 10,000 times greater than the most advanced modern instruments and will explore exploding stars, black holes, dark energy and traces of the universe's origins some 14 billion years ago.


Notice how it's called Dark Energy now and not dark matter? They are still having trouble tracking the orbit of an electron after all this time. And this inability to track it's orbit is what spawned the whole quantum mechanics field. And from that we get the widely misunderstood measurement and observation changes the outcome concept. I'm trying to find the names of the other two physicists that discussed this with Einstien. I am not sure if one was Shroedinger. The guy with the cat.

but the concept of measuring something changes the outcome is not quite right. What they are saying is that to measure an electron you have to get in very close and tight to it and the tighter you get the less likely you can determine it's path. Because you are grabbing an instant and the smaller the instant the smaller the movement and you need movement over time to determine direction. the problem with Electrons is that they don't go where you expect them to go, so when you look where they should be, they are not there. Hence, observation changes the outcome.

the real reason they are not where they are expected is because they are not traveling in our space at that instance. They have jumped into another space for that portion of the journey and then return to our space in a different (and to us) an unexpected position. A different dimension is the best description of it. for part of their orbit they are in a different dimension. Which is also why they appear to have about a 270 degree orbit with a jump that puts them past 360 degrees in rotation. I think the matter/energy is "dark" because it is not in this dimension all the time.

[mamboni]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgHLYHWGWPI

[palani]

They really should make their observations of remote galaxies when the shad flies aren't swarming.

[singular_me]

sacred geometry... tnx for bringing this up... I have had an EPIC thread on here about that, of course the topic was tagged as new age while it is "Godly Knowledge". Indeed, how did any low IQ bronze age civilization knew about get that *highly evolved knowledge* ???

we are in this impasse because most people cannot expand their understanding about reality, which is of course a cake walk for the NWO to manipulate.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgHLYHWGWPI

[StreetsOfGold]

NASA never fails to dazzle the dupes with BULLSHIT

[Horn]

that's the exact spot my brain got sucked into while on brown acid :cool:

[Cebu_4_2]

that's the exact spot my brain got sucked into while on brown acid :cool:


Did you meet the glub glub people?

[Horn]

Did you meet the glub glub people?

No, but it appeared exactly as that Vyger Orifice in Star Trek


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbHX160cgYo

[Horn]

Couldn't find the flat earth thread

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/epicmoon5jul2016.gif

Al Gore’s revamped “Triana” satellite catches the Moon photobombing Earth

From NASA Goddard:
NASA Camera Shows Moon Crossing Face of Earth for 2nd Time in a Year


For only the second time in a year, a NASA camera aboard the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite captured a view of the moon as it moved in front of the sunlit side of Earth.



https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/07/17/al-gores-revamped-triana-satellite-catches-the-moon-photobombing-earth/

[mamboni]

Couldn't find the flat earth thread

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/epicmoon5jul2016.gif

Al Gore’s revamped “Triana” satellite catches the Moon photobombing Earth

From NASA Goddard:
NASA Camera Shows Moon Crossing Face of Earth for 2nd Time in a Year


For only the second time in a year, a NASA camera aboard the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite captured a view of the moon as it moved in front of the sunlit side of Earth.



https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/07/17/al-gores-revamped-triana-satellite-catches-the-moon-photobombing-earth/The moons does not appear to be anywhere near 250,000 miles from earth in that animated image???

[Joshua01]

The moons does not appear to be anywhere near 250,000 miles from earth in that animated image???

That's exactly what I thought. This is an animation and of course, another lie

[Horn]

If u were looking at the back of my head while picturing also mamboni in Transylvania, it would appear huge.

[mamboni]

If u were looking at the back of my head while picturing also mamboni in Transylvania, it would appear huge.That's some good shit you're smoking bro.

[Horn]

http://m.imgur.com/gallery/wGNAa

[Glass]

and notice how much bigger the earth is to the moon compared to this old image apparently taken from the moon.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/image/planetary/earth/apollo08_earthrise.jpg

FE wga - Thread post # 226 (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?83953-Flat-Earthers-Won-t-Go-Away&p=832643&viewfull=1#post832643)

At least the ratios are more aligned with what they say the sizes of both are.

[vacuum]

and notice how much bigger the earth is to the moon compared to this old image apparently taken from the moon.

At least the ratios are more aligned with what they say the sizes of both are.

Perspective has a lot to do with it. You can't simply compare ratios of sizes on the screen.

For example, I could hold my finger up next to my eye, and it would appear to be the same size as the moon. You can't compare the ratio of my finger in the moon to determine the relative sizes them, unless you have additional information.

Here's a little more info:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Amj6RiGiTOE&t=3m32s
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Amj6RiGiTOE&t=3m32s)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2gTSjoEExc&t=7m21s

[Glass]

well you actually can and you can use some basic math and some time to ponder what you are "seeing" in those images.

In the FE thread I went through this using the numbers they give us for the size of moon and size of earth. Determining the circumference of both and then determining the "2D disk" area of both. The 2D disk is what you seen when you look at it. Because you are not seeing a globe or 3D image you are only seeing the circle portion facing you.

I think I concluded The Earth is something like 13 times the area of the moon. Maybe it was volume. I would need to go back and check. I did invite someone to check what I cam up with in case I made an error when I did it.

When you look at the image from the satellite of the moon passing in between the satellite and the earth you are seeing the earth to moon size comparison much more like it should be according to the math.

Given the size difference between the 2 objects and the proximity of them, the Earth should fill most of the moons "sky". Yet when you look at the image I posted which is a NASA image taken from the moon surface the earth looks perhaps 50% larger or maybe double the size the moon looks from earth. And you might even say that it doesn't look like there is any difference in size at some times of the month or year. And the reality is there should be a very big size difference between them.

In my opinion both of those images are fake but the satellite image has a more accurate ratio of Earth size to moon size than the NASA image from the moons surface.