Hillary, $87 Million Invested In Battleground State Ads Compared To Trump, $440,000

[ximmy]

What a waste... (can you imagine what she will spend on her friends if she becomes president?)

Clinton Has $87 Million Invested In Battleground State Ads Compared To Trump's $440,000
Regardless of whether the next U.S. president is Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, a handful of advertisers might look back on this election season as a huge disappointment.
Global Equities Research analyst Trip Chowdhry recently took a look at campaign ad spending on TV and radio by both of the leading candidates.
Battleground States Here’s a look at the total amount of booked presidential campaign ad spending by both candidates in several key swing states from July 14 to November 7:
Nevada:

Clinton: $9 million
Trump: $50 thousand

Iowa:

Clinton: $8 million
Trump: $0

Pennsylvania:

Clinton: $9 million
Trump: $129 thousand

New Hampshire:

Clinton: $7 million
Trump: $0

Virginia:

Clinton: $8 million
Trump: $58 thousand

Florida:

Clinton: $24 million
Trump: $0

North Carolina:

Clinton: $11 million
Trump: $146 thousand

Colorado:

Clinton: $11 million
Trump: $58 thousand

Clinton supporters may see these numbers as good news, but companies that depend on ad spending would prefer if the two candidates were slugging it out on ad spending cent-by-cent.
Related Link: 3 Unsettled Financial Planning Issues For Same-Sex Marriages (http://www.benzinga.com/news/16/07/8265345/3-unsettled-financial-planning-issues-for-same-sex-marriages)
Chowdhry said Trump’s relatively small ad spend will be bad news for social media stocks like Facebook Inc FB 1.35% (http://benzinga.com/stock/fb#NASDAQ) and Twitter Inc TWTR 3.42% (http://benzinga.com/stock/twtr#NYSE).
“The ad-spending gap between Trump and Clinton is just insane,” Chowdhry wrote. “If the above continues and Trump continues to remain frugal in ad-spend, then we think U.S. elections may not be a revenue catalyst for FB, TWTR and others.”
According to Bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-fec-filings/july/public/), Clinton’s campaign has raised $264.4 million and Trump’s campaign has raised $89.0 million to date.

http://www.benzinga.com/general/politics/16/07/8273175/clinton-has-87-million-invested-in-battleground-state-ads-compared-to

[Shami-Amourae]

Most of Trumps "advertising" comes from /pol/'s users. It's free and community driven content. We are trying to Meme Magic him into power.

https://s31.postimg.org/4u4j0e5yz/1466831547375.png

/pol/'s users also infiltrate different groups and cause infighting, whether we pose as Black Lives Matter activists, or Bernie supporters, who think it's now a "good idea" to support Jill Stein.

[Twisted Titan]

One thing is certain after going through bankruptcy several times. ....you are dam more frugal about how you spend your money.

[Shami-Amourae]

The Left is a mish-mash of different groups who normally would be wanting to kill one another. It doesn't take much to stir them up, and cause them to in fight within another. This is why trolling is such an effective tactic against the Left.

I'm also seeing larger support for 3rd Parties. A lot of my Facebook friends from high school who supported Bernie Sanders are now supporting Gary Johnson and Jill Stein. I only see one person on my entire feed actively promoting Hillary Clinton, and she's a raging fat feminist. They all seem low energy and unhappy with having to vote for Hillary Clinton.