View Full Version : Media RIGGING The Polls, Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is WINNING
EE_
8th August 2016, 08:06 AM
SPREAD THIS: Media RIGGING The Polls, Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is WINNING
August 4, 2016 The Truth Division Addison Riddleberger, Columns
Facebook
Twitter
There’s no doubt about it — the liberal media’s polls are rigged from the bottom up. How do we know this?
Simple — social media. Trump’s following on the major social media networks absolutely blow Clinton out of the water.
Allow me to prove it:
Facebook
Trump: 10,174,358 Likes
Clinton: 5,385,959 Likes
Trump nearly doubles the amount of Likes than Clinton Now — some people follow Trump who don’t like him, so let’s look at some posts. Here’s the stats for his latest Facebook live stream:
Trump Live Stream Post — 21 hours ago: 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views
Clinton Live Stream Post — 25 hours ago: 11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views
Since Clinton has zero shares, here’s the next best original post I could find from Clinton, albeit it’s not a live stream post:
Clinton post — 30 hours ago: 22,000 Likes, 7241 Shares, 773,000 views
Any way you slice it, Trump is crushing Clinton on Facebook interaction. One quick note regarding Facebook — you’ll find that on almost half of Clinton FB posts, the top comments are from Trump supporters, whereas the the top comments on Trump’s page are hardcore supporters only.
Twitter
Trump: 10.6 million followers
Hillary: 8.1 million followers
Trump has 30% more Twitter followers — and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history.
Hillary’s “twitter army” is likely made up of dead voters and illegals.
Youtube Live Stream
Trump: Averages 30,000 live viewers per stream
Clinton: Averages 500 live viewers per stream
Trump has 5900% more live viewers than Clinton.
Instagram
Trump: 2.2 million followers
Clinton: 1.8 million followers
Trump has 22% more Instagram followers — which is impressive considering it’s a liberal cesspool consisting of college hipsters who can’t seem to take enough selfies.
Reddit
Trump: 197,696 subscribers
Hillary: 24,429 subscribers
Hillary for Prison: 55,228 subscribers
Hillary for Prison’s Reddit feed has more than double subscribers of Hillary’s reddit page, equating to Trump having 700% more Reddit subscribers.
Don’t listen to the lying media — the only legitimate attack they have left is Trump’s poll numbers. Social media proves the GOP nominee has strong foundation and a firm backing.
http://thetruthdivision.com/2016/08/spread-this-media-rigging-the-polls-hiding-this-evidence-proving-trump-is-winning/
Ares
8th August 2016, 08:17 AM
Trump lit a fire a week or so ago when he said he feels the election will be rigged. If he losses to Hillary it will give his supporters enough ammunition to not live with the results and could result in wide spread civil unrest.
EE_
8th August 2016, 08:19 AM
Trump lit a fire a week or so ago when he said he feels the election will be rigged. If he losses to Hillary it will give his supporters enough ammunition to not live with the results and could result in wide spread civil unrest.
No matter who wins the election, this is going to end badly. We have 3 more months to prepare for civil unrest.
Joshua01
8th August 2016, 08:28 AM
Members of the MSM will be among those led out into the streets, along with the politicians, for tarring, feathering and riding a rail out of town
Joshua01
8th August 2016, 08:29 AM
Precisely. People who think it's going to be life as usual after this phony election will be in for an astounding surprise. That can't say we didn't warn them
Ares
8th August 2016, 08:34 AM
Trump wins BLM, and SJWs go full retard.
Hillary wins, conservatives go ape shit at having the election stolen.
Damned either way. This is the result of a 2 party monopoly and is exactly the reason our founders and first president said to stay away from political parties.
Jewboo
8th August 2016, 11:13 AM
Trump wins BLM, and SJWs go full retard.
Hillary wins, conservatives go ape shit at having the election stolen.
http://sliptalk.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/12162728/CleverProtestSign-IAmALittleUpset.jpg
http://us.acidcow.com/pics/20111010/classic_occupy_wall_street_protest_signs_09.jpg
Whitey Chimpout
:rolleyes:
Ares
8th August 2016, 11:20 AM
http://sliptalk.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/12162728/CleverProtestSign-IAmALittleUpset.jpg
http://us.acidcow.com/pics/20111010/classic_occupy_wall_street_protest_signs_09.jpg
Whitey Chimpout
:rolleyes:
Maybe, maybe not. Guess it would depend on how much Trump pushes the election was stolen narrative. It can go from signs of protest to armed conflict. America is a powder keg right now, all it will take is a spark to ignite it.
midnight rambler
8th August 2016, 11:23 AM
Maybe, maybe not. Guess it would depend on how much Trump pushes the election was stolen narrative. It can go from signs of protest to armed conflict. America is a powder keg right now, all it will take is a spark to ignite it.
Book views the world solely from his own perspective. He sees himself sitting on his own dead ass therefore he concludes everyone else will as well. lol
Ares
8th August 2016, 11:33 AM
Book views the world solely from his own perspective. He sees himself sitting on his own dead ass therefore he concludes everyone else will as well. lol
That may be, but more than half of America views Hillary as a crook and if Donald feels the election was stolen (by someone who has a long, long LONG history of theft and corruption) then I can see the situation spiraling out of hand pretty quickly.
ximmy
8th August 2016, 12:32 PM
That may be, but more than half of America views Hillary as a crook and if Donald feels the election was stolen (by someone who has a long, long LONG history of theft and corruption) then I can see the situation spiraling out of hand pretty quickly.
If almost half like Hilary something is very wrong with people...
Ares
8th August 2016, 12:34 PM
If almost half like Hilary something is very wrong with people...
Look who support her. SJW's, wall street, and clueless morons who only vote because she's a Woman and has a "D" next to her name. I wish we'd go back to the way the founders voting method. If you do not own property, you do not get to vote.
ximmy
8th August 2016, 12:50 PM
Look who support her. SJW's, wall street, and clueless morons who only vote because she's a Woman and has a "D" next to her name. I wish we'd go back to the way the founders voting method. If you do not own property, you do not get to vote.
Then these same elite would be voting... because they own most of the homes now.
The homeownership rate continued to decline in the second quarter of 2015, hitting a 48-year low.
The seasonally adjusted homeownership rate declined to 63.5%, down from 64.7% in the second quarter of 2014, according to estimates published by the Commerce Department on Tuesday. (The homeownership rate, not seasonally adjusted, hit 63.4%.) That is the country’s lowest homeownership rate since 1967.
In the first quarter of 2015 the homeownership rate hit its lowest level since 1989 (http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2015/04/28/the-homeownership-rate-is-now-the-lowest-since-1989-but-theres-a-silver-lining/).
http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-JP173_homeow_G_20150728120359.jpg
------
When the neighborhood is owned by billion-dollar companies
APOPKA, Florida (AP) — Many of the single-family homes in the Piedmont Park neighborhood of Apopka, Florida, used to be owned by families — the Vargases and the Townes, the Pierces and the Riddles. Now, they're owned by Blackstone, American Homes 4 Rent and Colony Starwood Homes, companies associated with big real estate investment firms.
And the occupants are tenants, not owners.
In the decade since the housing boom deflated into a bust, financial firms recognized an investment opportunity in hard-hit areas like this Orlando suburb. Single-family homes lost to foreclosure could be bought cheaply and transformed into rent-generating income streams.
The corporate purchases have spread through Piedmont Park and surrounding neighborhoods, where the percentage of renters rose from a bit over 10 percent to more than 35 percent within a decade. Piedmont Park homeowners complain that the result is more transient neighbors, less engagement at homeowners' meetings and difficulties reaching absentee corporate landlords.
------
How much house do Americans actually own?
Bob Sullivan, Credit.com 6:03 a.m. EDT July 24, 2016
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/dba00a21f9448dcbdf124b912df7088dcabcc972/c=120-0-2001-1414&r=x404&c=534x401/local/-/media/2016/07/22/USATODAY/USATODAY/636047921598407170-ThinkstockPhotos-179692092.jpg
(Photo: Thinkstock)
When people say they own their home, it’s usually a half-truth at best. Often, a bank owns the home they live in — most of it, anyway.
Still, Americans have a lot of real money tied up in their homes — on average, $150,506, according to a new report (http://www.urban.org/research/publication/how-much-house-do-americans-really-own-measuring-americas-accessible-housing-wealth-geography-and-age) by the Urban Institute called “How Much House Do Americans Really own? Measuring America’s Accessible Housing Wealth by Geography and Age.”
Homeownership Rates Are Falling, And It's Not Just A Millennial Problem
Shreya Agarwal (http://www.forbes.com/sites/shreyaagarwal/)
More people are renting than buying these days and they’re not just millennials.
Renters occupied about 36.3% of households last year, the highest figure in a decade, according to a new Census Bureau report out last week. At the same time, homeownership dropped to 63.6% compared to 69% ten years ago.
This uptick in rentals (and drop in homeownership) is often attributed to millennials who are putting off life’s big milestones. The data, however, paints a slightly different picture: Individuals in their mid-30′s to mid-40′s are more likely to be living in rentals today than they were a decade ago.
Homeownership has declined among those aged 35 to 44 from 67% in 2007 to 58% in 2015. That’s the largest decline among all age groups. According to Susan Wachter, Professor of Real Estate (http://www.forbes.com/real-estate/) and Finance at The Wharton School (http://www.forbes.com/colleges/university-of-pennsylvania/wharton-school/) of the University of Pennsylvania (http://www.forbes.com/colleges/university-of-pennsylvania/), this group was hit the hardest due to slowing wage growth and foreclosures.
crimethink
8th August 2016, 04:31 PM
That may be, but more than half of America views Hillary as a crook and if Donald feels the election was stolen (by someone who has a long, long LONG history of theft and corruption) then I can see the situation spiraling out of hand pretty quickly.
1860 2.0.
Hitch
8th August 2016, 05:18 PM
More people are renting than buying these days and they’re not just millennials.
Renters occupied about 36.3% of households last year, the highest figure in a decade, according to a new Census Bureau report out last week. At the same time, homeownership dropped to 63.6% compared to 69% ten years ago.
This uptick in rentals (and drop in homeownership) is often attributed to millennials who are putting off life’s big milestones. The data, however, paints a slightly different picture: Individuals in their mid-30′s to mid-40′s are more likely to be living in rentals today than they were a decade ago.
Homeownership has declined among those aged 35 to 44 from 67% in 2007 to 58% in 2015. That’s the largest decline among all age groups.
This part of the article may be by choice, not necessity. People in that age group don't want to buy homes because of what they saw during the 2008 crash...homed prices plummeting to an all time low. Now, home prices are super high propped up by these investment firms, low interest rates, and QE.
Renting, is the way to go right now. No way is now a good time to buy a home, at least out here. They want 800,000 for a 1000 foot apartment. Rent, save, let housing bubble 2.0 burst...then look to buy. I am not surprised home ownership is on the decline currently.
Cebu_4_2
8th August 2016, 05:23 PM
Look who support her. SJW's, wall street, and clueless morons who only vote because she's a Woman and has a "D" next to her name. I wish we'd go back to the way the founders voting method. If you do not own property, you do not get to vote.
If she don't get in, the whole world is in trouble. The veils come down, you cant bribe the leader. WTF can they do since the leader is bulletproof and can't be taken out? Is there any type of movie in these regards out?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.