PDA

View Full Version : 5 times Obama supported voter fraud



EE_
15th August 2016, 08:22 AM
5 times Obama supported voter fraud
AUGUST 13, 2016 159 Comments

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has done the nation a service by warning that the presidential election may be “rigged.”

What he didn’t say is that President Barack Obama has done everything in his power for eight years to make sure that American citizens have their votes canceled out by illegal aliens, dead people, and fraudulent voters across the country.

The Obama administration has stopped efforts to end voter fraud time and again. Here are a few of the most outrageous examples:

1. Suing North Carolina over voter ID

In 2013, North Carolina passed a new law that required voters to show a state ID, required citizens to vote in the district where they live, and made other anti-fraud reforms. President Obama joined the NAACP and other liberal activist groups in suing the state.

Last month, a three-judge panel struck down the law. The judges – two of whom were appointed by Obama – said they couldn’t point to any one part of the law that discriminated against anyone, but they felt that “in context” the bill was clearly racist.

Obama has reason to fight loose voter laws in that state. “There is reason to believe non-citizen voting changed one state’s Electoral College votes in 2008, delivering North Carolina to Obama,” according to a 2014 study from Old Dominion University. On Tuesday, an incensed Mr. Trump asked, “Why aren’t we having voter ID (laws)…as opposed to somebody coming up and voting 15 times for Hillary?”



2. Leaving illegal aliens and the dead on the rolls in Florida

Just ahead of the 2012 election, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit to stop the state of Florida from removing 53,000 dead people from the voting rolls and another 2,700 registered voters who were not even legal citizens.

Even though it’s a felony for non-citizens to vote, the “Justice” Department sued to protect the law-breakers and quash the law.



3. Obama sues his own government to let illegals vote

Sometimes an honest person gets a government job, even in an administration as corrupt as the Obama’s. An official on the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) approved a request that people registering to vote in Kansas, Alabama, and Georgia present proof they are actually American citizens before casting their ballots.

It’s as simple as bringing their birth certificate or passport – it’s only a problem if the person is here illegally. The Obama administration joined a group of left-wing activists in suing its own government official – something the federal judge overseeing the case called “unprecedented.”



4. Blatantly disregarding the law

Federal law requires states to check its list of registered voters and remove anyone who is dead or no longer a resident. But the Obama administration has defiantly thumbed its nose at the law. In November 2009, Julie Fernandes, who worked in the Justice Department’s civil rights office, said, “We have no interest in enforcing this provision of the law. It has nothing to do with increasing turnout, and we are just not going to do it.”

Fernandes now works as an “advocacy director” at the Open Society Foundations, the think tank founded and financed by shadowy internationalist billionaire George Soros. Soros has already spent $23 million to elect Hillary Clinton and other leftist Democrats to office this year.

Like so many other laws, the Obama administration has dared the American people to try to hold it accountable for its utter lawlessness.



5. Sending federal agents to prevent states from stopping illegals and Muslims from voting in 2012

The Obama administration may have made history as the only government that sent federal agents to stop the states from enforcing the law.

In 2012, Obama sent 780 federal observers to 51 jurisdictions in 23 states in order to make sure that state officials didn’t prevent illegals and other ineligible voters from voting in Obama’s re-election. Officially, the feds said they were only there to prevent “discrimination,” but CNN reported that the government helped those who spoke no English — including Detroit’s “growing Muslim population” — vote for president.



America desperately needs a real change – a president who will put American manufacturing, American jobs, American soldiers, and American voters first. But if Obama has his way, that president won’t take office in January, even if he wins.

– The Horn editorial staff.

https://thehornnews.com/5-times-obama-supported-voter-fraud/


Presidential election will be rigged?
AUGUST 11, 2016 189 Comments

By Stephen Dietrich, Managing Editor

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump warned supporters to be vigilant in November, suggesting in no uncertain terms that the general election could be rigged.

Trump is right — vote rigging is possible. Experts have warned about this for decades.

The statement caused an immediate media backlash, and liberal journalists in an uproar accused Trump of attacking the very foundation of democracy. And to these media talking heads’ credit, it does sound like a tale from the pages of a John Grisham novel.

A secret conspiracy to rig electronic voter machines and steal elections, put in place by establishment power brokers as a way to keep conservatives in line. It’s uncovered by a plucky mathematics wiz, who faces dangerous opposition at every turn. She races in time to get the word out… but no one would believe her?

It sounds too fantastic for most voters to believe. But it’s not.

The threat is very real. It could be happening in the United States right now.

That’s according to The Wichita Eagle, which recently reported on Wichita State University mathematician Dr. Beth Clarkson and her multi-year struggle to discover the truth behind suspected widespread voter fraud across Kansas — and possibly the entire United States.

And that very thought is unacceptable.

It all traces back to electronic voting machines, and Clarkson is on a mission to uncover the truth.

“Roughly 70 percent of states in the U.S. use some form of electronic voting,” according to CBS News reporter Mireya Villarreal, and hackers say the problems with electronic voting machines have been around for years. “The machines and the software are old and antiquated. But now with millions heading to the polls in three months, security experts are sounding the alarm.”

Clarkson, a certified quality engineer with a doctorate in statistics, has been sounding this same alarm for years. She says her calculations from the November 2014 election showed “inexplicable discrepancies” that suggested “some voting systems were being sabotaged.” After analyzing election returns at a precinct level, Clarkson found that candidate support was connected to the size of the precinct.

In Republican primaries specifically, she claims numbers indicate a bias against Tea Party conservatives in favor of Republican establishment candidates.

The problem isn’t limited to Kansas, either, and Clarkson wasn’t the first to note such U.S. election anomalies. Concerns over the integrity of U.S. elections have been widespread for years.

A 2012 paper found possible evidence that Mitt Romney’s primary win over more hardliner conservatives was aided by the same type of electronic voting patterns.

More recently, opponents of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton argued that election fraud was repeatedly committed throughout her 2016 primary win against Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. One Stanford research paper suggested the odds that Clinton did NOT commit widespread fraud in the primary to be 1 in 77 billion.

“For $15 and in-depth knowledge of the card, you could hack the vote,” Brian Varner, the principle researcher at software security company Symantec, told Villarreal during a demonstration.

So what can be done against this?

Authorities must implement a national audit system for electronic voting machines. To get them to comply, voters must demand it.

Clarkson went to court to get access to the paper audit trails from voting machines, but a district court ruled she couldn’t have access to those paper trails.

That is troublesome.

The very foundation of our American democracy is based on the integrity of our elections. The very notion that it is plausible that any of our elections could be rigged is totally and completely unacceptable.

So Trump is right. We need to be vigilant. We need to heed the warnings of experts.

It’s time we demand a national audit of these systems.

Our democracy depends upon it.

— Stephen Dietrich is the Managing Editor of The Horn News

https://thehornnews.com/presidential-election-will-rigged/

Joshua01
16th August 2016, 06:06 AM
We've known this all along, haven't we? Do we really need Trump to tell us what has been obvious for so long? Those who have been paying attention aren't surprised. Those who refuse to see will never get it