Election 2016 – Why Defeating Trump Won't Make Trump Go Away

[Ares]

In the wake of Trump’s recent hiring of Breitbart’s Stephen Bannon to campaign CEO, a June article published in Vanity Fair is now receiving a lot of attention.

Here are a few excerpts from the article, Is Donald Trump’s Endgame the Launch of Trump News?

The breakout media star of 2016 is, inarguably, Donald Trump, who has masterfully—and horrifyingly—demonstrated an aptitude for manipulating the news cycle, gaining billions of dollars worth of free airtime, and dominating coverage on every screen. Now, several people around him are looking for a way to leverage his supporters into a new media platform and cable channel.



Trump is indeed considering creating his own media business, built on the audience that has supported him thus far in his bid to become the next president of the United States. According to several people briefed on the discussions, the presumptive Republican nominee is examining the opportunity presented by the “audience” currently supporting him. He has also discussed the possibility of launching a “mini-media conglomerate” outside of his existing TV-production business, Trump Productions LLC. He has, according to one of these people, enlisted the consultation of his daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who owns the The New York Observer.



Trump’s rationale, according to this person, is that, “win or lose, we are onto something here. We’ve triggered a base of the population that hasn’t had a voice in a long time.” For his part, Kushner was heard at a New York dinner party saying that “the people here don’t understand what I’m seeing. You go to these arenas and people go crazy for him.” (Both Kushner and Ivanka Trump did not respond to a request for comment)…



Trump has proved that he no longer needs the platform that news outlets have traditionally provided for candidates. As my colleague Nick Bilton has noted, Trump has mastered the attention war on social media and discovered a preternatural ability to tap into his base directly. Love him or despise him, Trump indisputably has the finger on the pulse of his audience. And this connection could certainly facilitate such a hypothetical mini-media conglomerate. “Even old Fox News didn’t have the right read on what the base is,” one person briefed on the conversation told me. “And we do.”

So why am I highlighting this story? First, I think the analysis is correct, and I agree with the presumption that Donald Trump could very well launch a major media organization if he loses the election. There’s no way a man with the disposition and ego of Trump will fade away quietly from the public square. Furthermore, he’s now got tens of millions of supporters who will be looking for someone to give them direction. He’ll be more than happy to fulfill that role.

So if that’s right, why is it meaningful? It’s meaningful because Hillary Clinton and her supporters are making the case that Donald Trump in 2016 represents some sort of Hitlerian existential threat that much be defeated at all costs. They are desperately trying to sell to the public the notion that all concerns about her incredibly shady past can and should be set aside for the time being because keeping Trump out of the White House takes precedence over everything else. Of course, such an argument is easily dismissed by anyone who is aware enough to understand that Trump (like Sanders) merely serves as a vehicle for justified anger percolating across the land, and that defeating him as an individual accomplishes absolutely nothing in the long-term.

Indeed, a Donald Trump loss is likely to fan the flames of populist angst further, particularly if Hillary Clinton continues along with status quo business as usual as if nothing ever happened, which she undoubtably will. Ironically, many of these delusional “lesser of two evils” Hillary supporters may be unpleasantly surprised to discover that media mogul Trump could even more formidable (and dangerous) than President Trump. Which is precisely why merely fighting against symptoms of a rigged and unethical system solves absolutely nothing, and ultimately makes the underlying problem worse.

The bottom line. It doesn’t matter what happens in this election, Trump isn’t going anywhere because his supporters aren’t going anywhere.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-19/election-2016-%E2%80%93-why-defeating-trump-wont-make-trump-go-away

[Jerrylynnb]

This is really something to think about - and since he is jew-friendly (regrettably), he shouldn't have the kind of trouble getting advertisers on his news outlet that he would were he anti-jew and solidly pro-white.

I never thought of it that way.

Politics turns out to be too complicated with twisting trails and doudble-back scenarios - my mere mortal mind just can't keep up.

[crimethink]

No, Trump supporters and those who support American Populism (like me) aren't going away. Instead, we will be submerged underneath a flood of Turd World feces.

Demographics > money

Demographics > media

[Shami-Amourae]

No, Trump supporters and those who support American Populism (like me) aren't going away.

It's going to radicalize people on our side further. It may get to the point where Christians stop adopting Nigger kids from Africa to show what good people they are. Yeah, that bad.

https://s3.postimg.io/6otet6q83/1471526374731.jpg

[crimethink]

It's going to radicalize people on our side further. It may get to the point where Christians stop adopting Nigger kids from Africa to show what good people they are. Yeah, that bad.


I have to admire your optimism, but I can't share it. Save for a huge Black Swan, say, a pandemic with 90% kill rate, or Divine intervention, the White race is done for.

You and I have "fled to Switzerland," but the gates of the Camp will eventually open.

[Rubicon]

the white man will only revolt if niggerball is banned

otherwise, he'll just continue posting cathartic rants on the internet while going extinct

[Jewboo]

the white man will only revolt if niggerball is banned

otherwise, he'll just continue posting cathartic rants on the internet while going extinct

http://www.infostormer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Trump-Pepes-430x244.jpg

I'm saving our White Race by posting Pepe Trump memes on an internet forum that has twenty active members.

http://www.emoticonhq.com/images/ICQ/blush.jpg

[Cebu_4_2]

the white man will only revolt if niggerball is banned

otherwise, he'll just continue posting cathartic rants on the internet while going extinct

Fuck All you sterilized fucks, I am procreating with filipino bitches (ehh only 1 my wife) with my best genes. born blue eyes blond hair. Later does (unfortunately brown eyes) But brown curly hair just like my whisping strands that are left as an old man can tolerate. First fits good on the back of the bike but don't understand the leaning thing, could be a problem at a heavier weight but controlable now.

[Cebu_4_2]

on an internet forum that has twenty active members.


Quit running them off you fuck!

[Shami-Amourae]

We still haven't figured out how to deal with the Vaginal Jew.

https://s4.postimg.io/le6xhm6h7/1471595107731.jpg

https://s3.postimg.org/ayno2fr5f/1470178069821.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/4kykz6m9b/)

https://s3.postimg.org/y1isfci0j/1471043976730.png (https://postimg.org/image/q8s4ndc1b/)

[Cebu_4_2]

We still haven't figured out how to deal with the Vaginal Jew.


Punch them in the face, used to work well in the '80s and early '90s.

[cheka.]

that's exactly how the US got obomba...twiced

xx = welfare queen...whether on it now...or might need it in the future

[Jewboo]

Quit running them off you fuck!



http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/BN-CL899_PH_Int_G_20140422034034.jpg
Cebu's kids reading at GSUS about how their drunk daddy betrayed his own White People




Fuck All you sterilized fucks, I am procreating with filipino bitches (ehh only 1 my wife) with my best genes. born blue eyes blond hair.




:rolleyes:

[Cebu_4_2]

that's exactly how the US got obomba...twiced

xx = welfare queen...whether on it now...or might need it in the future

I am on medicaid you fuk, I can't afford affordible health care after they fucked me out of hundreds of thousands making my house affordable for the bankers to take from me! Left me bankrupt cause I can't afford to continue a war with the bankers. yeah whatever this place is scary, not like detroit, I can handle Detroit. Those hookers did look like something I could check out.

[Cebu_4_2]

Cebu's kids reading at GSUS about how their drunk daddy betrayed his own White People
:rolleyes:

I don't have parents in reality bro so bring it. I have 1 white one with a psycho american cunt and one with a stable God fearing Filipina, talk about my drunkeness and betrayal. I did good for human kind that wont resonate with the resonance bombs they placate.

If your trying to get under my skin I already asked to be a mod... lol.

[Jewboo]

I am on medicaid you fuk, I can't afford affordable health care...



https://41dcdfcd4dea0e5aba20-931851ca4d0d7cdafe33022cf8264a37.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.c om/8553824_closing-the-medical-cannabis-education-gap_e7352a70_m.jpg?bg=A4A196
Cebu firing up his Medicaid medical marijuana and logging into GSUS for more stoned shitposting

:rolleyes:

[vacuum]

We still haven't figured out how to deal with the Vaginal Jew.

https://s4.postimg.io/le6xhm6h7/1471595107731.jpg

https://s3.postimg.org/ayno2fr5f/1470178069821.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/4kykz6m9b/)

https://s3.postimg.org/y1isfci0j/1471043976730.png (https://postimg.org/image/q8s4ndc1b/)

I believe you're getting very very close to the core issue here.

[Jewboo]

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7VHe-9GJV8o/UAHUGqLo-TI/AAAAAAAABaU/gex98a08_Ww/s640/pioneers.jpg

When our Federal Government collapses and goes bankrupt wimmin will submit for protection and a meal.

http://addictinginfo.addictinginfoent.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Pioneer-Woman-with-Gun-and-Mule-Deer.jpg
"I'll have this cooked and on the table in about an hour Sir."

[cheka.]

I am on medicaid you fuk, I can't afford affordible health care after they fucked me out of hundreds of thousands making my house affordable for the bankers to take from me! Left me bankrupt cause I can't afford to continue a war with the bankers. yeah whatever this place is scary, not like detroit, I can handle Detroit. Those hookers did look like something I could check out.

dude...wtf?

my comment translated: women elected obomba. the numbers are there for anyone to see..

what triggered you?

[crimethink]

We still haven't figured out how to deal with the Vaginal Jew.

This is such bullshit. "Women are the problem" is something said by a male unable to win the affection of a strong, decent woman.

America and Western civilization has collapsed not because of women's voting habits. They have collapsed because White males are pussies - not even men.

"Women were less likely to vote for left-wing parties than their menfolk...

(...)

"...in some of these by July 1932 the NSDAP was winning a higher percentage of the female to male vote...

"...the NSDAP was arguably most successful of all in picking up the votes of pensioners and the elderly. This group, especially the women, constituted the largest reservoir of previous non-voters in the early 1930s..."

http://www.johndclare.net/Weimar6_Geary.htm

The bottom line: when men lead, women follow.

[cheka.]

http://www.gallup.com/poll/158588/gender-gap-2012-vote-largest-gallup-history.aspx

Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

President Barack Obama won the two-party vote among female voters in the 2012 election by 12 points, 56% to 44%, over Republican challenger Mitt Romney. Meanwhile, Romney won among men by an eight-point margin, 54% to 46%. That total 20-point gender gap is the largest Gallup has measured in a presidential election since it began compiling the vote by major subgroups in 1952.

[crimethink]

Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

President Barack Obama won the two-party vote among female voters in the 2012 election by 12 points, 56% to 44%, over Republican challenger Mitt Romney. Meanwhile, Romney won among men by an eight-point margin, 54% to 46%. That total 20-point gender gap is the largest Gallup has measured in a presidential election since it began compiling the vote by major subgroups in 1952.

We have two factors in play:

1) the Jewsmedia has worked tirelessly to portray the Nigger as the epitome of manhood for decades; stronger, bigger dick, more uninhibited, etc. (White) women will naturally follow this, compared to:
2) the typical American male is a drunken fool who shrieks about Niggers yet watches Monday Night Football, and shouts vain encouragement to his favorite Africoon ball carrier, and then abuses his woman when she doesn't bring the cold one quickly enough.

You want women to follow you? Be a man!

NOT this:

https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/44577970.jpg


The reason many "feminists" are highly attracted to Islamic terrorists is because, despite their grave faults, they are men, willing to die for their beliefs. It's not a contradiction; it's a demonstration that primal instincts trump ideology, even for leftists.

[Jewboo]

...abusing his woman when she doesn't bring the cold one quickly enough.

You want women to follow you? Be a man!



http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-QQ0v7ngu7eE/U4IoelMT_1I/AAAAAAAAAms/hdIjhykRMTc/s1600/domestic-violence-against-law.gif https://www.metrodenvercriminaldefense.com/images/shutterstock_17843134-300x200.jpg

Be a man but you can't "abuse" your woman.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/12/26/2443D62A00000578-0-image-m-5_1419588852422.jpg
"I'll call the cops again and tell them you hit me."




:D get real CT. You just posted this in another thread:


http://wp.production.patheos.com/blogs/thejesuitpost/files/2015/03/7xpxr.jpg

[Jewboo]

Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History



We should close that gap by abolishing "Voting" by women.

:)

[Neuro]

http://www.gallup.com/poll/158588/gender-gap-2012-vote-largest-gallup-history.aspx

Gender Gap in 2012 Vote Is Largest in Gallup's History

President Barack Obama won the two-party vote among female voters in the 2012 election by 12 points, 56% to 44%, over Republican challenger Mitt Romney. Meanwhile, Romney won among men by an eight-point margin, 54% to 46%. That total 20-point gender gap is the largest Gallup has measured in a presidential election since it began compiling the vote by major subgroups in 1952.

So women prefer to vote against a corporate money man who sold his soul for money and practices some weird Zionist religion, that allows men to marry several wives?

I will never understand women...

;D

[Shami-Amourae]

We should close that gap by abolishing "Voting" by women.

:)


https://s3.postimg.io/4ubsn8y6b/1401136735282.jpg

https://s3.postimg.io/ly0758mv7/1471146216356.jpg
https://s3.postimg.io/gkpq4mqyr/1471145989358.jpg

[crimethink]

Be a man but you can't "abuse" your woman.

Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it. (Ephesians 5:25)

Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them. (Colossians 3:19)

In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. (Ephesians 5:28)


I follow the Christian model of marriage. That involves sacrifice and service, not demand for respect. Respect is earned by example.

My model is not something a 501(c)(3) Babylon-licensed "church" teaches. My model is what God Himself revealed through His verified servants.

My model is not something that mentally and morally weak American "men" have taught their sons. Any "man" that has to appeal solely to his physical superiority over his woman is no man at all, but a mere beast.

[crimethink]

We should close that gap by abolishing "Voting" by women.


Adolf Hitler did not fear a good woman's vote. Why do you?

We need to abolish voting by the mentally and morally inferior. That does not include all women. There are tens of millions of "men" who vote with their dicks and never with their brains & spirits because their brains are woefully inadequate and their spirits are empty.

[crimethink]

Gallup and other polls deleted

Ah, so we're getting our "facts" from polls now?

You can give it up now, Clinton has it all locked up:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/189299/presidential-election-2016-key-indicators.aspx

https://www.dailywire.com/sites/default/files/uploads/2016/08/rcp_general_election_graph_8.18.2016.jpg


("Somehow" these pollsters that interview "random" women, alleging that "abortion" is the number one issue for women, never poll my wife, my daughter, my wife's mom, my mom, my wife's sisters, half the other women I know...all would quickly cite "jobs" or "the economy" as number one, and are appalled at "the 'right' to abortion"...)

[Shami-Amourae]

Adolf Hitler did not fear a good woman's vote. Why do you?

We need to abolish voting by the mentally and morally inferior. That does not include all women. There are tens of millions of "men" who vote with their dicks and never with their brains & spirits because their brains are woefully inadequate and their spirits are empty.

When the country was founded it was land owning White men only. That's a good basis I'd think.

[crimethink]

When the country was founded it was land owning White men only. That's a good basis I'd think.

Here's the difference: you put up as the epitome of "good government" the system of 1789. I put up as the epitome of good government the Third Reich.

"Land-owning White men" who kept millions of Niggers in the country for their personal profit, and are now our great misfortune.


In the face of this fact, is there not some justification for the opinion that the United States owe their very existence to the Jews? And if this be so, how much more can it be asserted that Jewish influence made the United States just what they are—that is, American? For what we call Americanism is nothing else, if we may say so, than the Jewish spirit distilled.

Werner Sombart

[Jewboo]

Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it. (Ephesians 5:25)

Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them. (Colossians 3:19)

In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. (Ephesians 5:28)


I follow the Christian model of marriage. That involves sacrifice and service, not demand for respect. Respect is earned by example.

My model is not something a 501(c)(3) Babylon-licensed "church" teaches. My model is what God Himself revealed through His verified servants.

My model is not something that mentally and morally weak American "men" have taught their sons. Any "man" that has to appeal solely to his physical superiority over his woman is no man at all, but a mere beast.

http://www.chromemusic.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/giphy1.gif

Now quote all the verses about wives "obeying" their husbands.

:rolleyes:

[crimethink]

Now quote all the verses about wives "obeying" their husbands.


Like this one?

Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God....Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

Ephesians 5:21, 33

[crimethink]

All women are passive and brainless, and incapable of leading the way:

https://www.yahoo.com/sy/ny/api/res/1.2/pi9Xut5vC8rvWJrqB4LQQg--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9NDUwO2g9MzA3O2lsPX BsYW5l/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/Reuters/2016-08-20T101701Z_1_LYNXNPEC7J09U_RTROPTP_2_GERMANY-AFD.JPG.cf.jpg

"Many people are increasingly feeling unsafe. Every law-abiding citizen should be in a position to defend themselves, their family and their friends," Frauke Petry told the Funke Media Group in an interview published on Saturday.

"We all know how long it takes until the police can get to the scene, especially in sparsely populated places," she said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/german-wing-leader-backs-citizens-arm-themselves-101701905.html?ref=gs

[Jewboo]

We need to abolish voting by the mentally and morally inferior.



https://volkundvaterland.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/jewtv.jpg

Who might that be?

[Jewboo]

Like this one?

Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God....Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

Ephesians 5:21, 33

Nice try cherry-picking pal. Go back and find us (wives + obey) some of the many "wives obey your husband" verses.

:D

[crimethink]

Nice try cherry-picking pal. Go back and find us (wives + obey) some of the many "wives obey your husband" verses.


Present what you're thinking of in context, and we can discuss.

Clearly, "submission" to each other is required.

[crimethink]

https://volkundvaterland.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/jewtv.jpg

Who might that be?

Those with low IQs and/or low morality. Includes "men" and women, Whites and non-Whites. The latter, ideally, will not be in America, period.

[Jewboo]

Present what you're thinking of in context, and we can discuss.

Clearly, "submission" to each other is required.


http://images.slideplayer.com/18/6108828/slides/slide_5.jpg


Ximmy knows way more about this Bible stuff than me, but this image alone blows you out of the water. Scroll up. You tried to only sell us on #1 totally and intentionally hiding the #2 OBEY part. I directly asked you to quote some and you evaded the entire "obey" issue.

Let's return this Christian Hijacked thread back to the OP Trump topic and continue in PM if you want.

:)

[Jewboo]

In the wake of Trump’s recent hiring of Breitbart’s Stephen Bannon to campaign CEO, a June article published in Vanity Fair is now receiving a lot of attention.

Here are a few excerpts from the article, Is Donald Trump’s Endgame the Launch of Trump News?

The breakout media star of 2016 is, inarguably, Donald Trump, who has masterfully—and horrifyingly—demonstrated an aptitude for manipulating the news cycle, gaining billions of dollars worth of free airtime, and dominating coverage on every screen. Now, several people around him are looking for a way to leverage his supporters into a new media platform and cable channel.



Trump is indeed considering creating his own media business, built on the audience that has supported him thus far in his bid to become the next president of the United States. According to several people briefed on the discussions, the presumptive Republican nominee is examining the opportunity presented by the “audience” currently supporting him. He has also discussed the possibility of launching a “mini-media conglomerate” outside of his existing TV-production business, Trump Productions LLC. He has, according to one of these people, enlisted the consultation of his daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who owns the The New York Observer.



Trump’s rationale, according to this person, is that, “win or lose, we are onto something here. We’ve triggered a base of the population that hasn’t had a voice in a long time.” For his part, Kushner was heard at a New York dinner party saying that “the people here don’t understand what I’m seeing. You go to these arenas and people go crazy for him.” (Both Kushner and Ivanka Trump did not respond to a request for comment)…



Trump has proved that he no longer needs the platform that news outlets have traditionally provided for candidates. As my colleague Nick Bilton has noted, Trump has mastered the attention war on social media and discovered a preternatural ability to tap into his base directly. Love him or despise him, Trump indisputably has the finger on the pulse of his audience. And this connection could certainly facilitate such a hypothetical mini-media conglomerate. “Even old Fox News didn’t have the right read on what the base is,” one person briefed on the conversation told me. “And we do.”

So why am I highlighting this story? First, I think the analysis is correct, and I agree with the presumption that Donald Trump could very well launch a major media organization if he loses the election. There’s no way a man with the disposition and ego of Trump will fade away quietly from the public square. Furthermore, he’s now got tens of millions of supporters who will be looking for someone to give them direction. He’ll be more than happy to fulfill that role.

So if that’s right, why is it meaningful? It’s meaningful because Hillary Clinton and her supporters are making the case that Donald Trump in 2016 represents some sort of Hitlerian existential threat that much be defeated at all costs. They are desperately trying to sell to the public the notion that all concerns about her incredibly shady past can and should be set aside for the time being because keeping Trump out of the White House takes precedence over everything else. Of course, such an argument is easily dismissed by anyone who is aware enough to understand that Trump (like Sanders) merely serves as a vehicle for justified anger percolating across the land, and that defeating him as an individual accomplishes absolutely nothing in the long-term.

Indeed, a Donald Trump loss is likely to fan the flames of populist angst further, particularly if Hillary Clinton continues along with status quo business as usual as if nothing ever happened, which she undoubtably will. Ironically, many of these delusional “lesser of two evils” Hillary supporters may be unpleasantly surprised to discover that media mogul Trump could even more formidable (and dangerous) than President Trump. Which is precisely why merely fighting against symptoms of a rigged and unethical system solves absolutely nothing, and ultimately makes the underlying problem worse.

The bottom line. It doesn’t matter what happens in this election, Trump isn’t going anywhere because his supporters aren’t going anywhere.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-19/election-2016-%E2%80%93-why-defeating-trump-wont-make-trump-go-away

bump. Sorry for the hijack Ares.

:)

[crimethink]

this image alone blows you out of the water. Scroll up. You tried to only sell us on #1 totally and intentionally hiding the #2 OBEY part. I directly asked you to quote some and you evaded the entire "obey" issue.


You would like to paint the "obey" to mean "mindless obedience to" rather than recognize the man as head of household. You concur with the "feminists" on the former.

I have noted that mutual "submission" is required by St. Paul's words.

Curiously, you've completely avoided what I've pointed out to you about women not being the malevolent influence you want to imagine.





Let's return this Christian Hijacked thread back to the OP Trump topic and continue in PM if you want.

This thread quickly devolved (http://gold-silver.us/forum/showthread.php?92033-Election-2016-%96-Why-Defeating-Trump-Won-t-Make-Trump-Go-Away&p=850207&viewfull=1#post850207) into a "woman are a menace" thread, and I merely responded. If anyone "hijacked" it, it was those who despise half of our race. And, I make no idiotic, Judeo-Freemasonic-inspired distinction between "politics" and "religion." Mine is a unified worldview.

[vacuum]

There is ignorance present which created the original flaws between men and women which are maliciously being exploited by the chosen ones, though they did not create it.

The ignorance is of the nature of the relationship between men and women. There are two underlying and opposing dynamics present in such a relationship. First is the mating dynamic which drives reproduction. Our DNA only cares about it's own propagation. We as individuals are only vehicles for the DNA to perfect itself over time. It doesn't care about our feelings. Men and women have different sexual strategies based on this programming. For men, it is to mate with as many females as possible. For women, its to mate with the dominate male while obtaining beta provider to pay for everything. She will only provide the absolute minimum amount of sex that the beta provider will accept in return for taking care of her. Even if she locks down the dominate man all to herself, over time she will break him down into a beta provider if he doesn't constantly prove his dominance. For our DNA to get the best possible traits, it fights monogamy. Once a child is old enough to be somewhat autonomous, about 4 years old, couples (usually women) are programmed to end the relationship and seek another. So this is all just classic optimal mating behavior/game theory. Emotions and feelings aren't a factor here, because they don't matter to your DNA.

The second dynamic is that of bonding, which, unlike mating, is designed to be permanent. This usually happens between parents and children, and among family members. Unlike the inherently selfish mating program, the bonding program is unselfish. Usually the bonding program runs earlier to bring couples together for a few years, and then the mating program wins out and breaks them apart.

Long-term married couples are sometimes able to defy this and have a good relationship for a long time. What this generally means is that sex isn't happening. Either one of the partners is always making excuses or one is always working or traveling or whatever, conveniently it stops.

In other words, orgasm triggers the mating behavior and associated conflict. Which is normal. In a situation where you're having kids a lot of natural mechanisms kick in to make sure things don't go wrong. You have inherent conflict which drives you forward, you have established religions to guide you down the known path to make sure your kids become productive.

Chastity is what avoids the problems associated with mating. This is why it is the path to higher spiritual traditions and teachings, because it does away with all the effort and struggle and resulting arms buildup between sexes.

Some religious traditions therefore say that certain people can't take a wife. But then another issue arises, and that is that men and women who are separate have overall less potential than those who are together. The reason for this is simple. The polarization of masculine and feminine functions is what drives consciousness to grow. Here, I definite masculine and feminine in abstract ways. Masculine is anything that interacts with the outside world. Feminine is anything that maintains or handles the inside world. For an individual for example, the masculine components would be the left brain and body parts adapted to interact with the outside world, whereas the feminine components would handle internal bodily functions and creativity. An individual is a conscious entity, and like any conscious entity, needs both masculine and feminine parts. Well a man and woman together as a couple can form a conscious entity which is not human per se, but a notch higher. That's what a "marriage" is supposed to be, from a spiritual perspective. But that only happens if they polarize masculine and feminine functions between them, and don't destroy it through orgasm. This is where the whole chivalry/chastity/purity ideas from the holy grail came from.

[crimethink]

There is ignorance present which created the original flaws between men and women which are maliciously being exploited by the chosen ones, though they did not create it....Our DNA only cares about it's own propagation....Men and women have different sexual strategies based on this programming.

The anti-human materialism you describe is, indeed, the product of "the chosen ones."

DNA does not "think." Men think. And spirit guides that thinking.

The Jews and Goyish Bolshevists (aka "nihilists") have worked for nearly two centuries to utterly destroy the truth of the Divine Design of mankind.

We have been reduced to animals with a certain degree of "self-awareness."

The self-chosen Master Race has been pushing the "humans are just another form of animal" meme for a long time, especially "academics." And the Goyim have followed right along! The Goyim have declared to the world, we are, indeed, "Goyim" (cattle)!! The "different reproductive strategies" are the product of Talmudvision and perverted mis-education. They are not natural, not inherent, not instinctive. Most of the religions of the world, not just Christianity, have put forth children as the most important purpose in this world, and both father & mother shared that equally & identically.

As for me, I remain a spiritualist and an idealist. There is more, much more, to what can be seen and perceived with senses that work only in the material world. The Devil is the god of this world, and that's why the Jew is a materialist who focuses only on this world. The original Talmudic conception was that there was no afterlife; this world of matter was the only thing.

[Hitch]

There is ignorance present which created the original flaws between men and women which are maliciously being exploited by the chosen ones, though they did not create it.

The ignorance is of the nature of the relationship between men and women. There are two underlying and opposing dynamics present in such a relationship. First is the mating dynamic which drives reproduction. Our DNA only cares about it's own propagation. We as individuals are only vehicles for the DNA to perfect itself over time. It doesn't care about our feelings. Men and women have different sexual strategies based on this programming. For men, it is to mate with as many females as possible. For women, its to mate with the dominate male while obtaining beta provider to pay for everything. She will only provide the absolute minimum amount of sex that the beta provider will accept in return for taking care of her. Even if she locks down the dominate man all to herself, over time she will break him down into a beta provider if he doesn't constantly prove his dominance. For our DNA to get the best possible traits, it fights monogamy. Once a child is old enough to be somewhat autonomous, about 4 years old, couples (usually women) are programmed to end the relationship and seek another. So this is all just classic optimal mating behavior/game theory. Emotions and feelings aren't a factor here, because they don't matter to your DNA.

The second dynamic is that of bonding, which, unlike mating, is designed to be permanent. This usually happens between parents and children, and among family members. Unlike the inherently selfish mating program, the bonding program is unselfish. Usually the bonding program runs earlier to bring couples together for a few years, and then the mating program wins out and breaks them apart.

Long-term married couples are sometimes able to defy this and have a good relationship for a long time. What this generally means is that sex isn't happening. Either one of the partners is always making excuses or one is always working or traveling or whatever, conveniently it stops.

In other words, orgasm triggers the mating behavior and associated conflict. Which is normal. In a situation where you're having kids a lot of natural mechanisms kick in to make sure things don't go wrong. You have inherent conflict which drives you forward, you have established religions to guide you down the known path to make sure your kids become productive.

Chastity is what avoids the problems associated with mating. This is why it is the path to higher spiritual traditions and teachings, because it does away with all the effort and struggle and resulting arms buildup between sexes.

Some religious traditions therefore say that certain people can't take a wife. But then another issue arises, and that is that men and women who are separate have overall less potential than those who are together. The reason for this is simple. The polarization of masculine and feminine functions is what drives consciousness to grow. Here, I definite masculine and feminine in abstract ways. Masculine is anything that interacts with the outside world. Feminine is anything that maintains or handles the inside world. For an individual for example, the masculine components would be the left brain and body parts adapted to interact with the outside world, whereas the feminine components would handle internal bodily functions and creativity. An individual is a conscious entity, and like any conscious entity, needs both masculine and feminine parts. Well a man and woman together as a couple can form a conscious entity which is not human per se, but a notch higher. That's what a "marriage" is supposed to be, from a spiritual perspective. But that only happens if they polarize masculine and feminine functions between them, and don't destroy it through orgasm. This is where the whole chivalry/chastity/purity ideas from the holy grail came from.

Vacuum, did you write this? This could be published it's so well written. To add, and what I think Crimethink and others whom have healthy marriages, is that religious beliefs, and why following God, and the Bible, is important. It keeps the "mating" game, both men and women, from causing the destruction of our societies. Look at any ghetto as an example. Men thinking with their dicks (DNA), women sleeping with the biggest assholes getting pregnant by them (again DNA) as you have written, and then kids running around, raised by single parents supported by taxpayers, without being raised with morals = a crime ridden shithole