PDA

View Full Version : Trump plan for child and elderly care



vacuum
13th September 2016, 07:15 PM
It's almost like....they are coming with policies to promote nuclear families.

The degenerates won't like this. Funny they never proposed this one.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/fact-sheet-donald-j.-trumps-new-child-care-plan


PROPOSAL: The Trump plan will rewrite the tax code to allow working parents to deduct from their income taxes child care expenses for up to four children and elderly dependents.


PROPOSAL: The Trump plan would create new Dependent Care Savings Accounts (DCSAs) so that families can set aside extra money to foster their children's development and offset elder care for their parents or adult dependents. These new accounts are available to everyone, and allow both tax-deductible contributions and tax-free appreciation year-to-year-unlike current law Dependent Care Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs), which are available only if it is offered by an employer and does not allow balances to accumulate.


PROPOSAL: Mr. Trump's plan will provide regulatory reform to promote new family-based and community-based solutions, and also add incentives for employers to provide child care at the workplace. The ability to set aside funds will be particularly helpful to women, low-income workers and minorities, who are statistically more likely to reduce time working outside the home in order to provide unpaid care.


PROPOSAL: The Trump plan will guarantee six weeks of paid maternity leave by amending the existing unemployment insurance (UI) that companies are required to carry. The benefit would apply only when employers don't offer paid maternity leave, and would be paid for by offsetting reductions in the program so that taxes are not raised. This enhancement will triple the average paid leave received by new mothers.

crimethink
13th September 2016, 07:34 PM
Free manure for your garden:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/09/13/clinton-campaign-slams-trumps-mad-men-era-maternity-leave-plan/

Top policy aides to Hillary Clinton's campaign dismissed Donald Trump's paid maternity leave proposal as "completely unserious" and out of touch with the needs of modern families.

Maya Harris, Clinton's senior adviser for policy, said that by focusing solely on leave policies that benefit women, Trump may actually be hurting their cause, contributing to the attrition of women from the workplace after childbirth and the gender pay gap.

"We’re not living in a 'Mad Men' era anymore, where only women are taking care of infants," Harris said. "It's just completely unserious.

"While his plan would undercut women in the workplace, it also provides no relief to working families," Harris added.

vacuum
13th September 2016, 07:50 PM
I want to point out that this will pretty much only increase the number of children from middle class families.

Certain groups of people who have many children will have them no matter what, whereas responsible people won't have children unless they can take care of them. These policies will get the responsible people to start having children.

crimethink
13th September 2016, 07:52 PM
I want to point out that this will pretty much only increase the number of children from middle class families.

Certain groups of people who have many children will have them no matter what, whereas responsible people won't have children unless they can take care of them. These policies will get the responsible people to start having children.

And that is exactly what we need: a counterbalance of social services to real Americans, since the degenerates, parasites, and invaders do their thang regardless of affordability.

EE_
13th September 2016, 07:53 PM
Edit:


I want to point out that this will pretty much only increase the number of children from middle class families.

Certain groups of people who have many children will have them no matter what, whereas responsible, smart people won't have children unless they can take care of them. These policies will get the responsible, smart people to start having children.

midnight rambler
13th September 2016, 07:54 PM
And that is exactly what we need: a counterbalance of social services to real Americans, since the degenerates, parasites, and invaders do their thang regardless of affordability.

IMO, it's far, far worse than simply that. 'Entitlements' enable and nurture a class of parasites/lowlifes/degenerates/sheboons/pavement apes/etc. who could NOT survive otherwise.

Twisted Titan
14th September 2016, 05:23 AM
Anything that can remotely benefit birth rates among white families will be throughly demonized


But is speaks to sheer insanity of these jackals because if white babies are not born who will support the welfare,warfare state?

Neuro
14th September 2016, 05:46 AM
Anything that can remotely benefit birth rates among white families will be throughly demonized


But is speaks to sheer insanity of these jackals because if white babies are not born who will support the welfare,warfare state?

Trump is the white Goy Milk Cow candidate. Hillary is the white Goy Beef cow candidate...

EE_
14th September 2016, 07:04 AM
Anything that can remotely benefit birth rates among white families will be throughly demonized


But is speaks to sheer insanity of these jackals because if white babies are not born who will support the welfare,warfare state?

Who will support these?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7DehoszZaw

Joshua01
14th September 2016, 07:29 AM
Who will support these?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7DehoszZaw

Did you pull this off the National Geographic website? Sheboons in their natural habitat.

ximmy
14th September 2016, 11:36 AM
Who will support these?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7DehoszZaw

Funny to watch that sprog get kicked across the floor like a hockey puck.

midnight rambler
14th September 2016, 11:38 AM
Sheboons in their natural habitat.

You beat me to the punch. lol

cheka.
14th September 2016, 11:50 AM
throwing a bone to the working women voters. the fsa gets same benefit FOR LIFE. of course all of the nevertrumps are howling how terrible it is. trump needs to say that we are going to pay for it by reducing benefits on the fsa -- so it nets out at zero