PDA

View Full Version : The Trump Trap TRAP Theory



Dachsie
1st October 2016, 05:21 PM
The Trump Trap TRAP Theory

DachsieLady

October 1 2016

_______
Today several top-billed stories linked on Rense.com with the following titles.



Rigged Podium Electronics, Hand Signals & More - Click Here

Clinton Caught Cheating Again With Another Ear Piece - Click Here

What Did Clinton Aide Remove From Her Podium? - Click Here

Another Clinton Mini-Seizure During Debate...Watch Closely - Click Here


Hillary's Teleprompter Inside Podium & Cleanup Man - Click Here



The item that first peaked my interest and my suspecting Sunsteinian tricks by THEM was...

Clinton Caught Cheating Again With Another Ear Piece - Click Here

http://www.charismanews.com/politics/events/60186-has-hillary-been-caught-cheating-again



Thank website shows a large photo of Hillary front and center. This close up of the side of Hillary's head with the ear piece initially struck me as way too too obvious, way too in your face, way too blatant.

Inordinate blatancy is a big tool and clue in trying to understand some of the Sunsteinian manipulations. (Note that when I used the terms THEY and THEM I am referring to TeamHillary Sunsteinian arrangers, fixers and tricksters.)

Keep in mind that TeamHillary was well aware of the many "gone viral" stories about the doubles and body doubles being used for Hillary Clinton in her recent appearances. TeamHillary was acutely aware that all eyes, eyes with magnifying glasses, would be intensely fixed upon the entity that took the podium on the first national debate with Donald Trump. Now would seem to NOT be the time to be careless and not carefully and thoroughly conceal the ear piece and the other tricks at the podium that important night, and yet THEY not only failed to conceal what so needed to be concealed,THEY blatantly took several tricky steps to reveal the ear piece.


First, the ear piece was very large, in fact it was the largest ear piece, ear bud, or hearing aid of recent models, that I have ever seen. The ear peice looked to be about on inch long from top to bottom and about one half inch across. It was clearly noticeable and its size did not come across as a real attempt to have it be not noticed.

Second, the ear piece was flesh colored. Yes, that is how modern hearing aid ear buds are concealed but this flesh coloring was not a genuine attempt to conceal, It was supposed to impress us a genuine attempt to conceal but this was negated by the very large size of the ear piece.

Third, her hair was worn so as to leave her ear about 99 percent uncovered by hair. This hair style was obviously not meant to conceal the ear piece but rather to to reveal it.

_____

There was also a Rense.com linked FoxNews.com video with the Rense caption...

Krauthammer - Trump Must Stop Falling For Traps

I did not watch the Krauthammer video but I know Fox News is full of tricks and traps THEMselves and I doubt that they are really starting to be truly supportive of Donald Trump, but rather to only play more Sunsteinian tricks to make us think their viewing audience think so. The Fox foxes have been gaming the Right, the conservatives, for decades. We need to keep that in mind. The Right is the same as the Left. Old boss same as the new boss.

I am suggesting that Krauthammer's saying Trump should not fall for "traps" is a Trap itself, hence my title "The Trump Trap TRAP Theory."

____

Here is part 2 of my analysis of this little bit of TeamHillary's debate production.

My theory is based on the old Problem - Reaction - Solution, Hegelian dialectic. Thesis - Antithesis - Synthesis.

I believe this whole matter of Hillary body doubles and fake Hillary faces and treasonous criminal physical electronics debate tricks is something that THEY, TeamHillary, are running with. They were initially caught with the fake Hillary's so THEY now are doing something like...

OK, you wanna see fake evil Hillary and all the tricks done right in your face? Then just watch US closely, or even watch US not so closely, on debate night. Now what is the Donald going to do? Ping!

They produced a new PROBLEM for us, and Trump is in the trapped position of having to REACT, the Reaction part of Problem/Reaction/Solution, to the blatant tricks and games played on him in Debate Number 1. Trump must make a move. He has to do something. He has to look presidential and take decisive action in the face of this blantant attack on him.

Trump can't be unpresidential and just lay down and take it. The blatant wrongdoing has been fully verified and widely published all over the web. Trump is being forced, trapped, to take strong action specifically about the fully revealed ear piece and hand signalling and other tricks during the debate. Ping! They have put the ball in Trump's court.


I do not know much about deep politics but I strongly suspect that there are "forces" and realities of the game that makes it not such a simple thing for the Donald to just strongly speak out against TeamHillary's tricks and blatantly breaking all the rules of the debate.

Even if the Donald sincerely wants to take strong clear action now, before the second upcomping debate, he has to hesitate and he needs very high powered strategizing to not fall for the Krauthhammer trap.

The way Trump Reacts to this contrived Problem will gain him or lose him a whole lot of votes at this crucial time. TeamTrump knows that. So they need to React in a brilliant way. Game Match Set.

Many of us out here were not going to even vote for President but we think since immediately worldwide nuclear war is what we would definitely get with Hillary, we feel we must vote for Donald Trump. We are not part of the "right" or "Alt Right" or whatever labels people are wont to pin on us.

So we get emails from Donald J. Trump like the one I received today titled "Next debate is in 8 days."

"Friend,

The next debate against Hillary Clinton is just 8 days away. I need your immediate feedback from the first debate in order to win the second one.

Please take the TRUMP Debate Preparation Survey now. >>

Friend, this election is too important to leave anything up to chance...."

I did not open or look at the survey but I did send a reply to the email that allowed me to express my input to him in prose, not box checking. Here it is...

"Dear Mr. Trump:

You should refuse to participate in another debate until you can arrange some honest third parties to manage the debate. If you participate in a debate managed by the same kind of people who managed the last one, you are knowingly cooperating with evil, and this is a big dissapointment and insult to those of us who see you as our only hope.

Shine the light on, blow the whistle on all of the gross miserable deceptions that were part of the Hillary gang at the last debate. Just say no.

What you do in this matter will either win you many more votes or cause you to lose a large numbers who are planning to vote for you."

I post this to show you the how Trump supporters are viewing the trap situation TeamHillary has hit him with.

____

There are many ways to analyze this presidential election. I am not a strong Trump supporter but I know it is important for all the people of the world, and maybe even survival of the planet, that Hillary not win. The games being played on us are way way too sophisticated for me. My analysis may already be planned for and taken into account by TeamHillary. I do not have the Solution to the dialectic delivered to Mr. Trump but I know I will view him as trapped and his campaign mortally wounded if he does not spring the trap back on THEM.

Shami-Amourae
1st October 2016, 06:01 PM
Many Traps do support Trump though.

https://s12.postimg.org/ekvpa7ipp/1471700454350.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/qzihaja7t/)

https://s12.postimg.org/hua4go6t9/1474360917438.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/oxhzwac8p/)

singular_me
1st October 2016, 06:15 PM
"Dear Mr. Trump:

You should refuse to participate in another debate until you can arrange some honest third parties to manage the debate

elementary, my dear watson.

Politics will forever mean to give away one's consent in this environment.

Jerrylynnb
1st October 2016, 06:34 PM
I recall how tricky the Clintons were back in the 90's, and how Larry Nichols described the tricks they pulled way back when he was Lt. Governer, then Governer. Hillary is well practiced in feigning weakness and then coming on strong finally in the ring.

I fell for it when she collapsed waiting for that Van. I couldn't believe she could possibly be walking so spry an hour later and acting like a spring chicken. Her episodes of left eye twitching, head bobbing, seemingly dazed before an audience, et al, could easily be deeper and more sinister Clinton tricks that they are probably the world's expert at. You can't believe a damn thing they do or say, especially if it seems to paint them as weak and nearly out of it. Don't fall for it.

I agree with the essay that Trump should just refuse to enter into the next debate if they insist on having dedicated podiums, and the spic bitch to moderate, and he should insist that his own technicians be allowed to inspect all the supporting devices and wiring moments before the debate should start. Just inform his supporters that his request is reasonable after the admitted (belatedly) degrading of his microphone for the hall only, and Holt's excessive interruptions and passing to the ball to Hillary, making him, Holt, seem like another member of Hillary's debate team, instead of a true neutral moderator. He should insist on having veto powers over who the moderator will be and participate in the selection.

I agree with this essay - Trump doesn't need to accept a rigged meet so full of tricks for the purpose of making him look inept. He doesn't need it, and, his message of jobs, border-security, and reasonable, but tough, international dealings is enough for a large majority of americans to stay in his camp, and for fence-sitters to jump on his bandwagon - most of us probably know someone close who lost their job and can't find another one - that is enough to win on all by itself.

singular_me
2nd October 2016, 06:42 AM
I personally think that taking on the races/cultures in this environment is either completely unwise or playing by the rules of divide and conquer.

There are so many other issues that would help people open their eyes, such as big pharma, biotech, massive and criminal pollution, DARPA, WW3 escalation and how to stop it, etc... so sorry, I cannot believe Trump is genuine. He just is the lesser of two evils.


The Lesser Of Two Evils Paradigm
2 October 2016 GMT
‘Most Americans dislike both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

But due to the corporate media, the two-sided one political class party, and the marginalization of third party (actually second party) candidates, the lesser of two evils paradigm rules.

This has basically replaced the left-right paradigm. There is very little difference between Democrats and Republicans, even with Trump turning over the Republican party apple cart. Both favor endless war and the dominance of the corporate-bankster economic system, albeit with stylistic differences.’
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/10/lesser-two-evils-paradigm.html

singular_me
2nd October 2016, 06:45 AM
I personally think that taking on the races/cultures in this environment is either completely unwise or playing by the rules of divide and conquer, all of which fuels civil unrest. Races/Cultures is only a surface issue and consequence of something so much deeper: a generational trauma, PTSD, caused by millennia of war (mutual invasion and destruction). Pushing the buttons of everybody is thus so easy, a very cheap formula. I will not fall for that.

There are so many other issues that would help people open their eyes very quickly, such as big pharma, biotech, massive and criminal pollution, apocalyptic food waste, DARPA, WW3 escalation and how to stop it, etc... so sorry, I cannot believe Trump is genuine. He just is the lesser of two evils.


The Lesser Of Two Evils Paradigm
2 October 2016 GMT
‘Most Americans dislike both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

But due to the corporate media, the two-sided one political class party, and the marginalization of third party (actually second party) candidates, the lesser of two evils paradigm rules.

This has basically replaced the left-right paradigm. There is very little difference between Democrats and Republicans, even with Trump turning over the Republican party apple cart. Both favor endless war and the dominance of the corporate-bankster economic system, albeit with stylistic differences.’
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/10/lesser-two-evils-paradigm.html