PDA

View Full Version : Fukushima Radiation Has Contaminated The Entire Pacific Ocean



EE_
2nd October 2016, 05:09 PM
Don't worry, we all know the Pacific ocean is way to large to be contaminated. It's all propaganda, I'm sure of it?

Fukushima Radiation Has Contaminated The Entire Pacific Ocean (And It's Going To Get Worse)
by Tyler Durden
Oct 2, 2016 12:19 PM

Submitted by Whitney Webb via TrueActivist.com,

http://ta1.universaltelegra.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/fukushima.jpg

The nuclear disaster has contaminated the world's largest ocean in only five years and it's still leaking 300 tons of radioactive waste every day.

An energy map provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows the intensity of the tsunami in the Pacific Ocean caused by the magnitude 8.9 earthquake which struck Japan on March 11, 2011. Thousands of people fled their homes along the Pacific coast of North and South America on Friday as a tsunami triggered by Japan's massive earthquake reached the region but appeared to spare it from major damage.

What was the most dangerous nuclear disaster in world history? Most people would say the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine, but they’d be wrong. In 2011, an earthquake, believed to be an aftershock of the 2010 earthquake in Chile, created a tsunami that caused a meltdown at the TEPCO nuclear power plant in Fukushima, Japan. Three nuclear reactors melted down and what happened next was the largest release of radiation into the water in the history of the world. Over the next three months, radioactive chemicals, some in even greater quantities than Chernobyl, leaked into the Pacific Ocean. However, the numbers may actually be much higher as Japanese official estimates have been proven by several scientists to be flawed in recent years.

fukushima-debris-island
Radioactive Debris from Fukushima approaching North America’s western coast Credit – RT

If that weren’t bad enough, Fukushima continues to leak an astounding 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day. It will continue do so indefinitely as the source of the leak cannot be sealed as it is inaccessible to both humans and robots due to extremely high temperatures.

It should come as no surprise, then, that Fukushima has contaminated the entire Pacific Ocean in just five years. This could easily be the worst environmental disaster in human history and it is almost never talked about by politicians, establishment scientists, or the news. It is interesting to note that TEPCO is a subsidiary partner with General Electric (also known as GE), one of the largest companies in the world, which has considerable control over numerous news corporations and politicians alike. Could this possibly explain the lack of news coverage Fukushima has received in the last five years? There is also evidence that GE knew about the poor condition of the Fukushima reactors for decades and did nothing. This led 1,400 Japanese citizens to sue GE for their role in the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

Even if we can’t see the radiation itself, some parts of North America’s western coast have been feeling the effects for years. Not long after Fukushima, fish in Canada began bleeding from their gills, mouths, and eyeballs. This “disease” has been ignored by the government and has decimated native fish populations, including the North Pacific herring. Elsewhere in Western Canada, independent scientists have measured a 300% increase in the level of radiation. According to them, the amount of radiation in the Pacific Ocean is increasing every year. Why is this being ignored by the mainstream media? It might have something to do with the fact that the US and Canadian governments have banned their citizens from talking about Fukushima so “people don’t panic.”

Further south in Oregon, USA, starfish began losing legs and then disintegrating entirely when Fukushima radiation arrived there in 2013. Now, they are dying in record amounts, putting the entire oceanic ecosystem in that area at risk. However, government officials say Fukushima is not to blame even though radiation in Oregon tuna tripled after Fukushima. In 2014, radiation on California beaches increased by 500 percent. In response, government officials said that the radiation was coming from a mysterious “unknown” source and was nothing to worry about.

However, Fukushima is having a bigger impact than just the West coast of North America. Scientists are now saying that the Pacific Ocean is already radioactive and is currently at least 5-10 times more radioactive than when the US government dropped numerous nuclear bombs in the Pacific during and after World War II. If we don’t start talking about Fukushima soon, we could all be in for a very unpleasant surprise.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-02/fukushima-radiation-has-contaminated-entire-pacific-ocean-and-its-going-get-worse

Glass
2nd October 2016, 05:38 PM
I'm not sure about that map's currency. I can't find a link to any source in the article. When I got to NOAA it's not clear where the map comes from. It doesn't appear to be any recent media release material.

It might be from 2011.

the ZH story was worded in a way that suggested it was a map of the intensity of the tsunami itself. I see a 2013 YT apparently debugging it but I haven't watched.

anyway, point is, the map might be 5 years old so it could be a worse picture.

Are you able to read the key on the side? I can't make it out. I think the top number starts with 220 but not sure of what. Actually it might be greater than 240, then 220. Does the text at the top say "cm" or something else?

Cebu_4_2
2nd October 2016, 05:43 PM
May have dissipated and this is fear mongering. That is how they controll the goy.

EE_
2nd October 2016, 06:09 PM
I'm not sure about that map's currency. I can't find a link to any source in the article. When I got to NOAA it's not clear where the map comes from. It doesn't appear to be any recent media release material.

It might be from 2011.

the ZH story was worded in a way that suggested it was a map of the intensity of the tsunami itself. I see a 2013 YT apparently debugging it but I haven't watched.

anyway, point is, the map might be 5 years old so it could be a worse picture.

Are you able to read the key on the side? I can't make it out. I think the top number starts with 220 but not sure of what. Actually it might be greater than 240, then 220. Does the text at the top say "cm" or something else?

I'm not sure what kind of illustration/animated map you want? The map gives you a good enough idea...unless it's all propaganda.

Cebu_4_2
2nd October 2016, 06:19 PM
I'm not sure what kind of illustration/animated map you want? The map gives you a good enough idea...unless it's all propaganda.


I agree fear propaganda.

Hitch
2nd October 2016, 06:51 PM
I'm not sure what kind of illustration/animated map you want? The map gives you a good enough idea...unless it's all propaganda.

EE, that map is BS. It completely ignores any and all ocean currents. Radiation has to spread by the water, right? Ocean currents is the vessel that it will travel.

Joshua01
2nd October 2016, 06:57 PM
That map is bullshit in so many ways. The currents don't flow like that

crimethink
2nd October 2016, 07:45 PM
It's not covered in the (((mainstream media))), but commercial fishing has been seeing the effects of Fukushima.

The safe dose of artificial radiation is ZERO. And we don't really know how high it has to be to be actually deadly.

Glass
2nd October 2016, 08:05 PM
I'm not sure what kind of illustration/animated map you want? The map gives you a good enough idea...unless it's all propaganda.

No offence meant. It's ok I wasn't asking you to provide another map. I was picking up on the wording of the reference to the map. It read as if the map was showing the Tsunami event itself but the article talked about the radiation spread. Which on the face of it a map like that could be used how. But I wasn't sure it was showing radiation by ocean current. And I could not see the scale/key clearly. No way of zooming in at the time I posted.

I expected that the NOAA would have this story front and center on their site if it was new or an update but the didn't and to be honest I can't work their web site. Seems Government web sites are designed to give you nothing useful by default. I was hoping if I asked someone would have a direct line on that story at DOAA or somewhere.

Anyway aside from the map the gist of the story is still the main thing. And it's a bad situation that nothing is said about it. I find I can't even talk to people about it because they just don't realise it's still going on. It isn't in the news so it must be a non thing.

Then of course you have these people who say Radiation is not a thing. Or not a thing that will kill you. And the lack of response to this Fukishima event, you have to wonder. If it isn't a thing then maybe it would explain the lack of solutions. Don't get me wrong. There is a response which looks like it won't have an end. SO it is a planet killer or IS it just another scam to bilk the public purse by having to have a response funded by taxpayers and apparently never ending like Terrorism?

Are the mass sea life deaths a real thing? Are they related or caused by something else?

There are so many scams going on now, you can't be sure if it's real or if it's made up to get some $$ out of the taxpayer. And then there's psychopathy. You can't expect a psycho to clean up after themselves. Just not going to happen.

EE_
2nd October 2016, 08:09 PM
No offence meant. It's ok I wasn't asking you to provide another map. I was picking up on the wording of the reference to the map. It read as if the map was showing the Tsunami event itself but the article talked about the radiation spread. Which on the face of it a map like that could be used how. But I wasn't sure it was showing radiation by ocean current. And I could not see the scale/key clearly. No way of zooming in at the time I posted.

I expected that the NOAA would have this story front and center on their site if it was new or an update but the didn't and to be honest I can't work their web site. Seems Government web sites are designed to give you nothing useful by default. I was hoping if I asked someone would have a direct line on that story at DOAA or somewhere.

Anyway aside from the map the gist of the story is still the main thing. And it's a bad situation that nothing is said about it. I find I can't even talk to people about it because they just don't realise it's still going on. It isn't in the news so it must be a non thing.

Then of course you have these people who say Radiation is not a thing. Or not a thing that will kill you. And the lack of response to this Fukishima event, you have to wonder. If it isn't a thing then maybe it would explain the lack of solutions. Don't get me wrong. There is a response which looks like it won't have an end. SO it is a planet killer or IS it just another scam to bilk the public purse by having to have a response funded by taxpayers and apparently never ending like Terrorism?

Are the mass sea life deaths a real thing? Are they related or caused by something else?

There are so many scams going on now, you can't be sure if it's real or if it's made up to get some $$ out of the taxpayer. And there's psychopathy. You can't expect a psycho to clean up after themselves. Just not going to happen.

I wasn't offended, I just didn't think any map could help find out anything. One thing for sure, every government in the world is completely silent on the matter. Do you think it was ever discussed at a G20, or UN meeting?

Joshua01
2nd October 2016, 08:10 PM
No offence meant. It's ok I wasn't asking you to provide another map. I was picking up on the wording of the reference to the map. It read as if the map was showing the Tsunami event itself but the article talked about the radiation spread. Which on the face of it a map like that could be used how. But I wasn't sure it was showing radiation by ocean current. And I could not see the scale/key clearly. No way of zooming in at the time I posted.

I expected that the NOAA would have this story front and center on their site if it was new or an update but the didn't and to be honest I can't work their web site. Seems Government web sites are designed to give you nothing useful by default. I was hoping if I asked someone would have a direct line on that story at DOAA or somewhere.

Anyway aside from the map the gist of the story is still the main thing. And it's a bad situation that nothing is said about it. I find I can't even talk to people about it because they just don't realise it's still going on. It isn't in the news so it must be a non thing.

Then of course you have these people who say Radiation is not a thing. Or not a thing that will kill you. And the lack of response to this Fukishima event, you have to wonder. If it isn't a thing then maybe it would explain the lack of solutions. Don't get me wrong. There is a response which looks like it won't have an end. SO it is a planet killer or IS it just another scam to bilk the public purse by having to have a response funded by taxpayers and apparently never ending like Terrorism?

Are the mass sea life deaths a real thing? Are they related or caused by something else?

There are so many scams going on now, you can't be sure if it's real or if it's made up to get some $$ out of the taxpayer. And then there's psychopathy. You can't expect a psycho to clean up after themselves. Just not going to happen.

Well said!

EE_
2nd October 2016, 08:13 PM
EE, that map is BS. It completely ignores any and all ocean currents. Radiation has to spread by the water, right? Ocean currents is the vessel that it will travel.

All the map says to me, is the shit has spread everywhere. Not hard to imagine after almost 6 years.

Glass
2nd October 2016, 10:47 PM
I don't think the map is showing radiation spread which is why I asked about the key. I thought it showed ocean level increases due to tsunami wave. The key says cm as in centimetres/centimeters so I wondered if it was change in water level or amount of radiation per centimetre?

The only link to a government site I can find so far is this one.

http://www.tsunami.gov/events/11Mar2011factsheet.php

Last modified 01 September 2011.

JohnQPublic
2nd October 2016, 11:09 PM
I don't think the map is showing radiation spread which is why I asked about the key. I thought it showed ocean level increases due to tsunami wave. The key says cm as in centimetres/centimeters so I wondered if it was change in water level or amount of radiation per centimetre?

The only link to a government site I can find so far is this one.

http://www.tsunami.gov/events/11Mar2011factsheet.php

Last modified 01 September 2011.

It is clearly tsunami intensity:

"The earthquake moved Honshu 8 feet (2.4 m) east ..."

2.4m =240 cm, the max reading on the chart, right next to Japan (I suppose at Honshu). It has nothing to do with the concentration of radioactive isotopes or radiation in general. Her is a better image:

(note the filename: http://geologycafe.com/oceans/images/tsunami_height_2011.jpg)

8520

read the article- it is all about waves: http://geologycafe.com/oceans/chapter10.html

JohnQPublic
2nd October 2016, 11:12 PM
Here is a similar illustration from the 2010 Chilean earthquake and tsunami. No nuclear power plants in this one (I do not think). Also had a max reading of 240 cm.

8521