Genetically modified Baby born with DNA from three different people

[singular_me]

Well I guess anything is possible at this stage then. I question a lot more parents who would do **anything** to have their own child but in the process, the story below clearly shows that the perception of offspring is about to become obsolete. Who knows, maybe in 5 years from now, we'll be hearing about babies born from 4 or 5 different DNAs.

Forget about money: controlling the DNA is in fact controlling everything.

In the meantime, there are so many kids that are up for adoption, waiting.

=======================
Genetically modified children: Baby born with DNA from three different people
4 October 2016 GMT

‘U.S. scientists recently announced the birth of a baby containing DNA from three different people in an article in New Scientist. They will present the details of the new procedure they used at the October meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

The procedure, which is illegal in the United States, was performed in Mexico.

It is not the first time that scientists have used biotechnology to produce a child with DNA from three separate people, but the researchers claim that their new technique is significantly more precise, and has major implications for the prevention of genetic disease.’

Preventing genetic disease
The fertility procedure was performed on a couple in which the woman was a carrier for a fatal genetic disorder known as Leigh Syndrome. The syndrome is a progressive neurological disorder that produces loss of movement and mental function, ending with death by early childhood................


What does the technology really mean?
The announcement drew praise from proponents of the technology, but also concern from critics.

Many objections were the same as those cited by the FDA in 2002, when it banned a three-person DNA technique known as cytoplasmic transfer. That technique was successfully used to produce as many as 50 children before the FDA prohibited it, citing unaddressed concerns over side effects and ethical implications.

Some of the children produced using cytoplasmic transfer were born lacking an X chromosome, and at least one showed signs of cognitive impairment.

Animal studies on newer mitochondrial replacement techniques suggest that they may carry some of the same risks. Researchers have seen cognitive impairment in mice and changes in male fertility and ageing in insects.

"It is outrageous that they simply ignored the cautious approach of US regulators and went to Mexico, because they think they know better," said David King of the pro-choice group Human Genetics Alert.

Another concern raised with such techniques is that they consist of germline modification – that is, they make genetic changes that can be passed on to other generations. In a very real sense, the safety implications of such techniques are unknowable until several generations have passed.

Bioethics experts also warn that any germline modification can lead down the slippery slope to "designer babies" and other ethically murky areas.

"Germ line therapy ... is something defined by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as effectively constituting eugenics," says British MP Fiona Bruce, chair of the UK's All Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group.

The United Kingdom recently passed a law making it the only country on earth to explicitly permit three-person fertilization techniques.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/055512_germline_modification_biotech_three_parents .html#ixzz4M7OQhGmF


SOURCE
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-37485263

==================
2014
http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/media/images/77260000/jpg/_77260487_piaon.jpg

Alana Saarinen loves playing golf and the piano, listening to music and hanging out with friends. In those respects, she's like many teenagers around the world. Except she's not, because every cell in Alana's body isn't like mine and yours - Alana is one of a few people in the world who have DNA from three people.
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-28986843

[Cebu_4_2]

I'm fukt.

[crimethink]

In the meantime, there are so many kids that are up for adoption, waiting.

Most of them defective.

Very few healthy White babies are available for adoption. Most unwanted healthy White babies are aborted.

Most kids available for adoption are mixed breeds and/or those with severe issues, including drug damage/addiction. That's why they stay "in the system" instead of get adopted. It's sad, but no one can expect the majority to want those who are not their own kind and/or accept a lifetime of sorrows due to someone's "mistakes." Orphanages are the best option.

The fact of the matter is, most parents would love to have a child who looks like the girl in the OP. It's as simple as that, and there's nothing wrong with that instinct.

Anyone who shrieks about my comments here can post their adoption certificates for several of these unwanted kids.

[brosil]

Most of them defective.

Very few healthy White babies are available for adoption. Most unwanted healthy White babies are aborted.

Most kids available for adoption are mixed breeds and/or those with severe issues, including drug damage/addiction. That's why they stay "in the system" instead of get adopted. It's sad, but no one can expect the majority to want those who are not their own kind and/or accept a lifetime of sorrows due to someone's "mistakes." Orphanages are the best option.

The fact of the matter is, most parents would love to have a child who looks like the girl in the OP. It's as simple as that, and there's nothing wrong with that instinct.

Anyone who shrieks about my comments here can post their adoption certificates for several of these unwanted kids.

Unfortunately, I agree with you. If you own firearms, you can pretty well write off adoption as well. This is exactly what genetic modification should be used for. Not designing some perfect looking child but eliminating genetic faults like hemophilia and Huntington's Correa.

[singular_me]

cognitive issues are rampant these days even in families that didnt adopt a child. One doesnt need to have parents who are addicts/pervs to have a son/daughter becoming one. The problem is not the family but social engineering damages most households. I firmly believe that epigenetics has much to offer, if the environment could change radically, it would heal spontaneously many people. If... if... so nothing is set in stone.

The death cult took everybody for a ride 25yrs or so ago, making us believe that genetics would never be used for humans... and now we all have to accept that a better species, homo sapiens 2.0, is in the making plus all other possible combinations. Just like in Star Trek but with no fairy tale attached. I will not oppose because it cannot be stopped, but if we really want gene editing to benefit mankind, masses need to know, otherwise we (most of humanity) are NEXT. Only when something is out fully in the open that it doesnt cause any harm.

[crimethink]

Unfortunately, I agree with you. If you own firearms, you can pretty well write off adoption as well. This is exactly what genetic modification should be used for. Not designing some perfect looking child but eliminating genetic faults like hemophilia and Huntington's Correa.

I have great fear of where genetic engineering of humans is going, but, I fully understand the appeal of it.

The transhumanists, most of whom are rich Jews, will not allow genetic engineering humans to end. What they want makes this look quite holy.

[crimethink]

cognitive issues are rampant these days even in families that didnt adopt a child. One doesnt need to have parents who are addicts/pervs to have a son/daughter becoming one. The problem is not the family but damages most households. I firmly believe that epigenetics has much to offer, if the environment could change radically, it would heal spontaneously many people. If... if... so nothing is set in stone.

The death cult took everybody for a ride 25yrs or so ago, making us believe that genetics would never be used for humans... and now we all have to accept that a better species, homo sapiens 2.0 is in the making plus all other possible combinations. Just like in Star Trek. I will not oppose because it cannot be stopped, but if we really that gene editing to benefit mankind, masses need to know, otherwise we (most of humanity) are NEXT. Only when something is out fully in the open that it doesnt cause any harm.

I'm referring to the "mothers" who insist on taking drugs or drinking or do both while pregnant, and cause permanent damage to their offspring. They don't really want the kid, and they guarantee the kid is unadoptable.

As for epigenetics, what you are describing is called a "miracle," not epigenetics. It requires God's personal intervention in His material design to effect. One does not simply "wish away" terrible afflictions, no matter how many movies claim so.

As for genetic engineering being used on humans, only a fool believed it would never come to pass. The power presented is way too intoxicating for it to be put in a box and forgotten. And the transhumanist, mostly rich Jews, plan to use GE on humans to effect their horrors, to make themselves "immortal."

[Jewboo]

http://arhivach.org/a_cimg/?h=42b46d38169f70e560f9635778884273

Once (((they))) identify the gene responsible for their hooked nose they can replace that gene with a goy gene and save themselves many shekels for an expensive nose job.

[singular_me]

any presidential campaign avoiding this subject is a deception and leads the populace to the slaughterhouse. A money-free society is also key because otherwise only the top 5-10% will be able to benefit from it. Darwin has to go otherwise like I said, you/we are next.

Darwinism for humans has always been a major satanic deception, and now we can see how it was designed to enhance depopulation in due time. The scientific community argues in favor of gene editing and its necessity to fight diseases but behind the scene operates against the gullible masses. That is how any power structure works whatsoever.

The topic is really dangerous in the sense that it would bring about the end of society as we know it since it even implies that all races can be improved.

However the other day I ran into the amazing story of George Washington Carver which I am posting to show that enslaving will forever remaining immoral. Talking in the broad sense here, and that is our duty to stand against any form of servitude. And DNA serfdom is right around the corner.

==================================
Genetically Modified Human Beings Could Exist By 2017, Researchers Raise Concerns
8 October 2016 GMT

Already, we know that a genetically modified organism is an organism that has had its DNA altered or modified in some way through genetic engineering. Mostly, the organism is altered with DNA from another organism, be it a bacterium, plant, virus or animal.

From animals and plants, the DNA altering has now caught up with human beings. Soon, we would see genetically modified human beings.

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) is a new genetic editing tool, which scientists claim could transform the field of biology. In fact, for many years now, scientists have been experimenting on gene editing techniques in order to find the best tool to alter the DNA of human beings. It is through this search that animal and plant genes were altered by scientists.’

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) is a new genetic editing tool, which scientists claim could transform the field of biology. In fact, for many years now, scientists have been experimenting on gene editing techniques in order to find the best tool to alter the DNA of human beings. It is through this search that animal and plant genes were altered by scientists.

With the discovery of CRISPR, it allows scientists to edit human genes with unprecedented precision, efficiency, and flexibility. So far, scientists claim to have successfully used CRISPR to create monkeys with targeted mutations to prevent HIV infection in human cells.

In 2015, Chinese scientists announced they successfully used CRISPR to create a genetically modified human embryo. In April 2016, the same Chinese researchers announced they have genetically modified another human embryo.

But even before the Chinese announcement of the second modified embryo, in February 2016, British scientists were given permission by the country’s regulators to genetically modify human embryos by using CRISPR-Cas9 and related techniques. The embryos were to be destroyed after seven days due to ethical and legal restrictions.

These developments showed clearly that soon, scientists will start editing the human gene, if permitted by governments.

A private biotechnology company in the United States called Editas Medicine, has announced that by 2017, it will produce the first genetically modified human beings on Earth. The company plans to start the first trials soon.

According to Editas Medicine, it is poised to become the first lab in the world to ‘genetically edit’ the DNA of patients suffering from a genetic condition. Specifically, the company is concentrating on a blinding disorder known as ‘leber congenital amaurosis’. The disorder prevents normal function of the retina; the light-sensitive layer of cells at the back of the eye. It appears at birth or in the first months of life and eventually, sufferers can go completely blind.

MORE
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/10/genetically-modified-human-beings-exist-2017-researchers-raise-concerns.html

====================

George Washington Carver Biography
Botanist, Chemist, Scientist, Inventor (c. 1864–1943)
Synopsis

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d0/George_Washington_Carver_c1910_-_Restoration.jpg/330px-George_Washington_Carver_c1910_-_Restoration.jpg

George Washington Carver was born into slavery in Diamond, Missouri, around 1864. The exact year and date of his birth are unknown. Carver went on to become one of the most prominent scientists and inventors of his time, as well as a teacher at the Tuskegee Institute. Carver devised over 100 products using one major crop—the peanut—including dyes, plastics and gasoline. He died in 1943.


Carver's work at Tuskegee included groundbreaking research on plant biology that brought him to national prominence. Many of these early experiments focused on the development of new uses for crops such as peanuts, sweet potatoes, soybeans and pecans. The hundreds of products he invented included plastics, paints, dyes and even a kind of gasoline. In 1920, Carver delivered a speech before the Peanut Growers Association, attesting to the wide potential of peanuts. The following year, he testified before Congress in support of a tariff on imported peanuts. With the help of Carver's testimony, Congress passed the tariff in 1922.

long
http://www.biography.com/people/george-washington-carver-9240299

[Neuro]

I firmly believe that epigenetics has much to offer, if the environment could change radically, it would heal spontaneously many people.

Wrong. The lesson from the past is, if the environment radically changes, most will die. Those who manage to survive epigenetics works on to change their particular gene expression according to the new conditions!

[singular_me]

keep supporting the current system neuro, to death, people are going to die due to their environment nonetheless.

you are a statist (pro-power structures) with it comes down to science and politics and therefore cannot be in support of bruce Lipton who established the link between emotions (what you get from the environment) and health. So I sustain that a free society would heal people from any cartel induced traumas, radically.

but you also take my words too extremely : any change that is pro-freedom influencing the RNA will need at least 1 generation to become noticeable. But it is radical compared to what we have had so far (much of the same for about 4000 years).

Do you want me to post this article that they introduced pets and plants into an elderly care facility and the death rate went down by much?

You dont think you ever will agree with epigentics at all since it recognizes paranormal factors, like mind control and beliefs, as explained by Lipton. You look at epigentics with a darwinian mindset, so there is no room for a debate.


here it is
The change was dramatic, reports Good News Network: There was a 50% drop in medical prescriptions along with a dramatic decrease in death rates – but most importantly, the residents were simply happier.

Even though animals in nursing homes were illegal at the time, Dr. Thomas brought in two dogs, four cats, hens, rabbits, 100 parakeets, a multitude of plants, a flower garden, and vegetable patch.
The Washington Post reported that the illegal act was a resounding success:

http://daisyluther.com/when-a-doctor-illegally-put-the-home-back-into-nursing-homes-death-rates-plummeted/



Wrong. The lesson from the past is, if the environment radically changes, most will die. Those who manage to survive epigenetics works on to change their particular gene expression according to the new conditions!

[Neuro]

keep supporting the current system neuro, to death, people are going to die due to their environment nonetheless.

you are a statist (pro-power structures) with it comes down to science and politics and therefore cannot be in support of bruce Lipton who established the link between emotions (what you get from the environment) and health. So I sustain that a free society would heal people from any cartel induced traumas, radically.

but you also take my words too extremely : any change that is pro-freedom influencing the RNA will need at least 1 generation to become noticeable. But it is radical compared to what we have had so far (much of the same for about 4000 years).

Do you want me to post this article that they introduced pets and plants into an elderly care facility and the death rate went down by much?

You dont think you ever will agree with epigentics at all since it recognizes paranormal factors, like mind control and beliefs, as explained by Lipton. You look at epigentics with a darwinian mindset, so there is no room for a debate.


here it is
The change was dramatic, reports Good News Network: There was a 50% drop in medical prescriptions along with a dramatic decrease in death rates – but most importantly, the residents were simply happier.

Even though animals in nursing homes were illegal at the time, Dr. Thomas brought in two dogs, four cats, hens, rabbits, 100 parakeets, a multitude of plants, a flower garden, and vegetable patch.
The Washington Post reported that the illegal act was a resounding success:

http://daisyluther.com/when-a-doctor-illegally-put-the-home-back-into-nursing-homes-death-rates-plummeted/

You idiot, I agree with epigenetics, but with a radical environmental change let's say a temperature drop of 5°C following a major volcano, a really big meteor or a nuclear war, with dust in the atmosphere covering the sun for a decade , you'll have a 90% die off. This has nothing at all to do with ideology, which you btw consistently perceive erroneously you twit. This is the reality!

Go ahead change the subject now, you always do when you lose an argument!

[crimethink]

Carver devised over 100 products using one major crop—the peanut—including dyes, plastics and gasoline.

http://tightrope.cc/Black-Invention-Myths.htm#carver

[singular_me]

me an idiot, you see you didnt even get what I was saying.... you are speaking of temperature while I am speaking of emotions making people sick

like I said, you look at epigentics with a darwinian mindset. Case proven.

I am talking of the work of Bruce Lipton. You lose because I stated that if the death cult could be terminated, many people would heal spontaneously. And their emotions would contribute to their healing. And you objected. Obviously you dont read me.




You idiot, I agree with epigenetics, but with a radical environmental change let's say a temperature drop of 5°C following a major volcano, a really big meteor or a nuclear war, with dust in the atmosphere covering the sun for a decade , you'll have a 90% die off. This has nothing at all to do with ideology, which you btw consistently perceive erroneously you twit. This is the reality!

Go ahead change the subject now, you always do when you lose an argument!

[singular_me]

this supremacist site only shows 10 lines of bashing without supporting evidence, and mainly go after the peanuts and potatoes but doesnt say anything about the rest, all of which can be read at the biography.com site. He seems to have done a lot more. Your site nonetheless lacks to offer a documented analysis.

so why am I supposed to believe a debunker omitting or ignoring 3/4 of the story?

I have no problem to conceive that some of the facts may have been embellished for political purposes at the time though.


Actually this the Achilles's heel of trains of thoughts such as yours: darwinism will always condone or legitimate any aggression and dumbing down. Regardless on the side of the fence one sits on. Chinese also think they are better than caucasians, for example. Same of Indians toward pakistanis. Etc.

So yes, we are not out of the woods just yet, meaning that the NWO still has bright days ahead.

[Neuro]

me an idiot, you see you didnt even get what I was saying.... you are speaking of temperature while I am speaking of emotions making people sick

like I said, you look at epigentics with a darwinian mindset. Case proven.

I am talking of the work of Bruce Lipton. You lose because I stated that if the death cult could be terminated, many people would heal spontaneously. And their emotions would contribute to their healing. And you objected. Obviously you dont read me.

I see, so you decided to re-interpret "radical change of environment", into something related to your own mental health, something you "feel".

You really are a mentally deranged SJW. Good luck with that, you and your ilk will be on the losing end for centuries to come... ;D

[singular_me]

go back to the original posting to which you responded, I clearly state that if civilization ever changed radically, people would heal spontaneously (emotionally), then I even posted this article to illustrate my stance about an elderly care facility which introduced plants and pets and that drug prescriptions and the death rate decreased dramatically.

yeah call me mentally deranged because you fail to understand bruce lipton's work about beliefs (and perceptions of the environment) that make people sick - and which I am referring to.

Sure Bruce Lipton and anybody supporting his findings are on the losing end... You lose again

Additionally, how many times have I mentioned that the NWO control social perceptions on here?

(his lectures are on utube)
The Biology of Belief will forever change how you think about your own thinking. Stunning new scientific discoveries about the biochemical effects of the brain’s functioning show that all the cells of your body are affected by your thoughts
https://www.brucelipton.com/books/biology-of-belief

But that you may not get because your blind support of darwinian oriented science made you misinterpret what I was actually saying.





I see, so you decided to re-interpret "radical change of environment", into something related to your own mental health, something you "feel".

You really are a mentally deranged SJW. Good luck with that, you and your ilk will be on the losing end for centuries to come... ;D