Wikileaks Releases Another 1,150 Podesta Emails: 14OCT2016

[JohnQPublic]

Wikileaks Releases Another 1,150 Podesta Emails In Part 7 Of Data Dump: Total Is Now 10,169 (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-14/wikileaks-releases-another-1150-podesta-emails-part-7-data-dump-total-now-10169)

[JohnQPublic]

Interesting:

Where Is Sidney Blumenthal's 16th "Missing" Email? (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-14/where-sidney-blumenthals-16th-missing-email)


"...They do not plan to release anything publicly, so no posting online or anything public-facing, just to the committee. That said, they are considering placing a story with a friendly at the AP (Matt Lee or Bradley Klapper), that would lay this out before the majority on the committee has a chance to realize what they have and distort it."

"...WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department cannot find in its records all or part of 15 work-related emails from Hillary Rodham Clinton's private server that were released this week by a House panel investigating the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, officials said Thursday.

The emails all predate the Sept. 11 assault on the U.S. diplomatic facility and include scant words written by Clinton herself, the officials said. They consist of more in a series of would-be intelligence reports passed to her by longtime political confidant Sidney Blumenthal, the officials said.

Nevertheless, the fact that the State Department says it can't find them among emails she provided surely will raise new questions about Clinton's use of a personal email account and server while secretary of state and whether she has provided the agency all of her work-related correspondence, as she claims.

Here is CNN's take on the same issue (http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/25/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-benghazi-state-department/), in an article that came out virtually at the same time:
The State Department has not been able to find emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private server in its archives, State Department officials said Thursday.
The officials said the State Department is missing all or part of 15 emails from longtime confidant Sidney Blumenthal released this week by a House panel investigating the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. Blumenthal provided the Select Committee on Benghazi with the emails.

Here is NBC (http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/state-department-15-emails-missing-hillary-clinton-cache-n382151):
The State Department cannot find in its records all or part of 15 work-related emails from Hillary Rodham Clinton's private server that were released this week by a House panel investigating the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, officials said Thursday.

Here is NYT (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/26/us/state-dept-gets-libya-emails-that-clinton-didnt-hand-over.html?_r=0):
The State Department said on Thursday that 15 emails sent or received by Hillary Rodham Clinton were missing from records that she has turned over, raising new questions about whether she deleted work-related emails from the private account she used exclusively while in office.

And here is CBS (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/15-benghazi-emails-missing-from-clinton-cache-state-department-says/):
The State Department cannot find in its records all or part of 15 work-related emails from Hillary Rodham Clinton's private server that were released this week by a House panel investigating the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, officials said Thursday.

And so on..."

[vs., from the leaked email]:

"... the State Department may acknowledge as soon as today that there were 16 Sid emails missing from the 55k pages of material produced by HRC...
... none of these 16 emails are qualitatively different than the dozens of others that Hillary already produced to the State Department...

... The State Department says that at least 16 of the emails that Sid Blumenthal turned over to the Benghazi Select Committee were not included in the 55,000 pages of materials produced by Hillary Clinton..."

[16-15 = 1 Missing Email]

[Joshua01]

http://goldismoney2.com/attachments/14720472_1077303989057552_5303706033658932295_n-jpg.85570/

[monty]

WikiLeaks & HSBC Leaks Seal Google's Fate. Corruption revealed, lawsuits to be filed.


http://youtu.be/8FjUSciiEcA

https://youtu.be/8FjUSciiEcA

[monty]

Truth or Fiction?


WIKILEAKS AND HSBC LEAKS SEAL GOOGLE’S FATE. CORRUPTION REVEALED. LAWSUITS TO BE FILED.

http://www.londonworldwide.com/wikileaks-and-hsbc-leaks-seal-googles-fate-corruption-revealed-lawsuits-to-be-filed/

http://www.londonworldwide.com/wp-content/uploads/windbookfreebh0-930x450.jpg
WIKILEAKS AND HSBC LEAKS SEAL GOOGLE’S FATE. CORRUPTION REVEALED. LAWSUITS TO BE FILED.
– Multiple lawsuits, including a demand for a Special Prosecutor, may soon bring Google’s legal department to tears.
– Leaked documents show that Google coordinated with White House for favors, campaign rigging and political “hit-jobs”.
– Direct dirty deeds and government contract rigging between West Wing and Google executives revealed.
– Felony violations of the law exposed but will Obama FBI do anything?

One Plaintiff’s statement says:
“We would like to sue Google on behalf of ourselves and the hundreds of millions of American’s Google has lied to, manipulated, defrauded and cyber-stalked. Google is pulling strings to blockade our legal right to have our case heard in front of a jury. Over 400 Google employers were placed inside of state and federal offices in order to try to shut down any disclosure of Google’s corrupt and illicit actions. This is not theory. We have the names and HR data for each person and we will display it in the court room. Google has expended tens of millions of dollars to attack us and to try to intimidate law-firms in order to slow our effort towards justice.

“That is not how America works, Google. You do not get to commit these crimes and get away with it Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, Jared Cohen, John Doerr, David Drummond and your other corrupt billionaire buddies!”

We have two sources of proof of these criminal actions by Google owners, executives and investors.
1.) We have witnessed and experienced Google engaging in these crimes.

2.) Recent document leaks and whistle-blowers have confirmed these crimes by Google.

We have been advised by federal law enforcement, community legal groups and Constitutional law experts that we are entirely free to use any legally obtained evidence that we find in public view. It does not matter if it comes from DNC insiders, Wikileaks, Google’s own employees, or Russian diplomats. It is now entirely legal for us to use anything we legally find on the internet or in public statements. We will use such materials in this case.

In fact, though, we do not need any more evidence than what we already have from first-hand knowledge, to put Google senior staff in prison. We know what will be confirmed in some of the upcoming leaks. Those leaks will only serve to double-down on the criminal and civil charges we have already made against Google. We have filed thousands of pages of evidence with the FBI, GAO, FTC, SEC, FEC and other law enforcement and regulatory agencies.

Google, YouTube, Alphabet, Jigsaw, In-Q-Tel, and all of their various front organizations, are controlled by the same people with the same bizarre agenda operating under bribery and payola schemes with famous politicians. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Our state and federal confirmed filings, our U.S. Patent records, the published news items and hundreds of signatories on our NDA’s say that we built the first Google free-services-search website that the current Google copied. The people who launched the company you know as the current Google came to look at, and copy, our “original Google”. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google, and a company called Kleiner Perkins, have a campaign payola deal with White House executives. This deal trades search engine rigging for Cleantech “green money” handouts ordered up by White House staff from various state and federal agencies. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google has a contracted relationship with non-Congressionally approved rogue groups, like In-Q-Tel, Media Matters, Sid Blumenthal Group and New America Foundation; who use U.S. treasury funds to attack competitors. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Larry Page, Eric Schmidt, Ann Wojcicki and Sergey Brin did not build the first Google, they stole the technology from others, particularly us. Google, particularly the three founders, steal their technology. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

We are Google’s competitors that Google violated anti-monopoly and anti-trust laws against by operating Google as a “Cartel”. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google has paid money to Gawker Media and Gawker Media has paid money to Google. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it. Google and Gawker Media have a series of quid-pro-quo relationships which provide for the mutual deployment of character assassinations of their business and political enemies. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google’s lawyer, and other Google associates, work in and control the U.S. Patent Office for the protection of Google patent territory. Google’s patent staff took vendetta actions against us on orders from Google bosses. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google bosses have demonstrated a lack of morality by the vast number of sexual scandals they have been involved in. This indicates a higher-than-normal predilection, by Google bosses, to engage in criminal and illicit activity. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google has always had, and today fully has, total control over the text, links, results, adjacent results and all positioning of each and every Google search result and mnemonic impression and Google selectively adjusts those results in order to harm competitors and political adversaries and hype investor friends and partners like Elon Musk. Google lied to government regulators, in multiple nations, when Google stated that executives had no control over Google results. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

We, our legal representatives, and others, sent hundreds of communications to Google asking Google to stop harassing, cyber-stalking and search engine locking attacks against us. Google refused to comply with attack reduction and, in fact, increased the attacks against us mentioned herein. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google receives operational orders from White House campaign financiers and those communications are recorded in emails and phone calls. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google stated on the record that it’s search results change every few hours yet Google locked each attack they coordinated against us on the same top lines of the front page of Google, around the globe, for over five years without any shift in placement. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google meets the legal definition as an organized crime RICO-violation illicit “Cartel”. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google bribes politicians to get Google’s owned politicians to harm Google’s competitors. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

We placed thousands of server sensors in different ISP’s in different locations around the entire internet for extended periods of time in order to catch Google rigging the internet and did, in fact, catch Google rigging the internet. Others have emulated these tests and also caught Google rigging internet results. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google rigs the internet to hide misdeeds and company failures by Elon Musk while, concurrently, pumping up and hyping cover stories to hide those misdeeds because Larry Page and Elon Musk are best boyfriends and Google owns parts of Tesla and Tesla battery suppliers. We have an internet tracking record from 2007 to today, comparing the daily results for Tesla and Elon Musk, vs. the top 15 global search engines vs. pro and con news on each. The results on Google were rigged by Google. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.
Google has received billions and billions of U.S. Treasury money that were exclusively provided to Google on a quid-pro-quo basis by politicians that Google financed. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google owns corrupt lithium mining interests along with Elon Musk. That is why a common search engine company is also building electric cars. Google and their partner, Elon Musk, do this in order to scam tens of billions of taxpayer dollars from DOE and DOT exclusive White House ordered government hand-outs. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google pumps marketing hype for stock market pump-and-dumps which inure exclusively to Google investors and against Google enemies. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

Google sabotaged and circumvented our government funding and rerouted it to Google. We can prove it in court! News reports, Congressional and law enforcement reports already prove it.

There is much more factual data and evidence sets that, upon becoming public knowledge, will prove that White House staff and U.S. Senators are running cover-ups in order to protect their insider scam deal with Google, rig election perceptions and search results, and run Google as a “protection racket” using taxpayer resources.” The Tsunami of leaked documents are coming fast and furious and some of the biggest shockers are promised on the morning of November 8th!

See the evidence produced, by multiple Plaintiffs, for federal law enforcement officers at:


http://wp.me/P7j6BA-BUV


http://www.slush-fund.com (http://www.slush-fund.com/)


http://www.muckety.com/ (http://www.muckety.com/)


http://gizmodom.net///GALLERY2 (http://gizmodom.net///GALLERY2)


http://globalscoop.net/googleinvestigation (http://globalscoop.net/googleinvestigation)


https://vid.me/VIDME_GLOBAL_3 (https://vid.me/VIDME_GLOBAL_3)


http://xyzcase.xyz (http://xyzcase.xyz/)


http://xyzcase.xyz/files/data/public/4dd304 (http://xyzcase.xyz/files/data/public/4dd304)


https://mega.nz/#F!6Rk1hC7K!5FxlpPi_eG52GnYuN_JmeA (https://mega.nz/#F!6Rk1hC7K!5FxlpPi_eG52GnYuN_JmeA)


The Big Leak Repository (https://www.dropbox.com/sh/1uc1zyfmncjcup7/AABbLPzOjaX7DF-5loqMtQD_a?dl=0)



…and thousands more


Lawyers or litigation financiers, who wish to support these cases, should contact the Plaintiff groups at http://www.xyzcase.xyz (http://www.xyzcase.xyz/)
Related posts:

[EE_]

Wikileaks — Hillary Clinton Admits: Politcal System Designed to Protect Party Establishments; Suggests New Rules to Benefit Democrats

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2016/10/Goldman-Sachs-Groundbreaking-with-Hillary-Richard-DrewAP-640x480-420x315.jpg
Jew-Bags - Goldman Sachs Groundbreaking with Hillary

by KATIE MCHUGH15 Oct 20164258
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER


Some of the mysterious Hillary Clinton transcripts of speeches given to Goldman Sachs were released by Wikileaks in another document dump on Saturday, October 15. In the speeches, Mrs. Clinton admits that the current political system is designed to protect party establishments, she suggests reworking Senate rules to undercut opposition to Democrats, and states that incumbents tend to not have “the full interests of the people,” among other revelations.
At a private paid speech, Goldman Sachs CEO Llyod Blankfein asked now-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton if the American political system should be entirely scrapped and replaced with a parliamentary system.

“But just a general question to start you off on the domestic situation. Is the American political system just hopeless? Should we just throw it away, start over?” Goldman Sachs CEO Llyod Blankfein asked on October 29, 2013, during the “Builders and Innovators Summit.” He went on:

You know, go home. Get a parliamentary system. Is it—because I will tell you—I’m kidding. We—talking here, and I didn’t do this in a formal survey, but when we ask entrepreneurs, whether they were social entrepreneurs, the people who were talking represented the work they’re doing in the cities and the businesses represented here, every conversation referred to either what the government was doing or what the government wasn’t doing that it was obvious that they should be doing.

And then I guess a corollary question to my first approach, should we chuck it away, will the elections make a differences. The system so gummed up where a single senator can so gum up appointments and basically extort legislation or stop legislation, is the system so screwed up now that really that we just have to have some cataclysm that just gets everybody so frustrated that we de facto start over, you know, or practically start over?

Clinton replied that the politics in Washington, D.C. were “dysfunctional” during Obama’s second term, especially regarding the government shutdown. She said:

Well, look, I—I think that everyone agrees that we’re in a bad patch in our political system and in Washington. It’s—you know, there’s a lot of good things happening elsewhere in the country. There are a lot of mayors, you had Mitch Landrieu here, I was with Rahm Emanuel yesterday. There’s a lot of innovative, interesting, new ideas being put into practice by mayors, by some governors. So I think when we talk about our political system, we’re really focusing more on what’s happening in Washington. And it is dysfunctional right now. And it is for a variety of reasons, some of them systemic, as you suggested.

Clinton endorsed changing the rules of the Senate so a determined group of Republicans couldn’t hold up the confirmation of presidential appointees. She said:

You know, I really have come to believe that we need to change the rules in the Senate, having served there for eight years. It’s only gotten more difficult to do anything. And I think nominees deserve a vote up or down. Policies deserve a vote up or down. And I don’t think that a small handful of senators should stand in the way of that, because, you know, a lot of those senators are really obstructionist. They should get out. They should make their case. They should go ahead and debate. But they shouldn’t be able to stop the action of the United States Senate. So I think there does have to be some reworking of the rules, particularly in the Senate.

I think that, as has been discussed many times, the partisan drawing of lines in Congressional districts gives people — gives incumbents certainly a lot more protection than an election should offer. And then they’re only concerned about getting a challenge from the left of the Democratic Party or a challenge from the right in the Republican Party. And they’re not representing really the full interests of the people in the area that they’re supposed to be.

California moved toward this non-partisan board, and I think there should be more efforts in states to do that and get out of the ridiculous gerrymandering that has given us so many members who don’t really care what is happening in the country, don’t really care what the facts are. They just care whether they get a primary opponent.

And then it comes down to who we vote for and what kind of expectations we set and who we give money to. Those who help to fund elections, I think it’s important that business leaders make it clear, why would you give money to somebody who was willing to wreck the full faith and credit of the United States. I mean, that just makes no sense at all because the economic repercussions would have been very bad, and the long-term consequences with, you know, the Chinese saying, let’s de-Americanize the world and eventually move to a different reserve currency wouldn’t be, you know, beneficial, either. So I think there are steps that citizens have to take. It’s not just about how we rearrange the levers of power and the institutions in Washington.

“But there has to be a new ethos,” Clinton added. “I mean, we can’t let people, as you say, be extortionists. And the President was absolutely right not to negotiate with people who were acting the way that the minority of the minority was acting on the shutdown and the debt limit issue.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/15/goldman-sachs-ceo-asks-hillary-clinton-should-we-throw-away-the-american-political-system-and-start-over/

[Shami-Amourae]

Media collusion with Podesta getting drafts of NYT articles before they're published
>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/844

More media collusion with Podesta being aware of media preparations before they break
>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1216

More pre-published NYT articles being passed along for review
>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1106

Vice does what Soros tells them
>https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/910

Vice looking to help Podesta In any way they can
>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4316

Head of Yahoo news planning pro-Hillary pieces with Podesta
>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4836

Scripted MSNBC interview
>https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4274

Colluding with CNBC
>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5142

H receives questions before debate
>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205

[Joshua01]

Looks like I'll have to find another search engine

Here's a glimpse of the future:

www.google.com

http://ecommerceblog.mightymerchant.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/404-image.jpg

[vacuum]

PART 10 JUST DROPPED

800 new emails

[Joshua01]

PART 10 JUST DROPPED

800 new emails

Got a link?

[vacuum]

Got a link?

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57ykjs/new_wikileaks_podesta_emails_part_10_800_more/

[Joshua01]

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/57ykjs/new_wikileaks_podesta_emails_part_10_800_more/

Thank you! :)

[JohnQPublic]

Is this for real?

BREAKING BOMBSHELL : WIKILEAKS JUST EXPOSED THE FAKE “TRUMP GROPING” PLOT (http://truthfeed.com/breaking-bombshell-wikileaks-just-exposed-the-fake-trump-groping-plot/29565/)
"Back in May 2016, Democrats prepared a FAKE Craigslist “Trump employment ad,” using the word “grope,” which as we now know is a common term among these fake Trump accusers.How “coincidental” that Democrats were play-acting out a scenario with Trump “groping” and a “kiss on the lips.”
Why would they do this when there was never any accusations of his GROPING prior to week three of the presidential election?
The Democrats have been plotting and planning the GROP SLANDER for a long time now."

8567