View Full Version : Almost half of all men are trimming or shaving their leg hair – why?
crimethink
18th October 2016, 02:10 AM
Damn, the only time I've been known to cut any limb hair is when I take a new knife to an arm to see just how sharp it is...
This is trannyism-light...eschewing their manhood in the physical realm.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/fashion/men-who-shave-legs-spornosexuals-mens-health-poll-a7365536.html
Almost half of men admit to trimming or shaving their leg hair - en eyebrow raising admission, even for a generation of spornosexual manscapers.
Male hair trimming that rarely concerns body hair south of the border, unless you’re a professional swimmer or cyclist - but these days average Joes everywhere are taking razors to their hairy pins.
Read more
Surveying their Facebook followers, Men’s Health found that while the majority of men are not completely shaving their legs, a surprising 15 per cent are, while a further 33 per cent admitted: “I don’t shave clean, but I do use a trimmer to cut it down”. That’s nearly half of the men polled that are tackling their leg hair in some way or form - but why?
osoab
18th October 2016, 02:32 AM
Damn, the only time I've been known to cut any limb hair is when I take a new knife to an arm to see just how sharp it is...
This is trannyism-light...eschewing their manhood in the physical realm.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/fashion/men-who-shave-legs-spornosexuals-mens-health-poll-a7365536.html
Almost half of men admit to trimming or shaving their leg hair - en eyebrow raising admission, even for a generation of spornosexual manscapers.
Male hair trimming that rarely concerns body hair south of the border, unless you’re a professional swimmer or cyclist - but these days average Joes everywhere are taking razors to their hairy pins.
Read more
Surveying their Facebook followers, Men’s Health found that while the majority of men are not completely shaving their legs, a surprising 15 per cent are, while a further 33 per cent admitted: “I don’t shave clean, but I do use a trimmer to cut it down”. That’s nearly half of the men polled that are tackling their leg hair in some way or form - but why?
was this pole only in NYC?
Hitch
18th October 2016, 05:02 AM
It is called manscaping. You guys don't manscaping?
Dogman
18th October 2016, 06:11 AM
It is called manscaping. You guys don't manscaping? Personally, not only NO but Hell NO !
I call all men worth their salt to protest the high cost of razors and having haircuts and let their freak flags grow ! ;D
Buzz cutting is for conformist !
Walk life without fear of conforming to anyone's expectations or standards other than your own !
I hope I live long enough to grow my mane past my knees and nary a sharp anything touches a hair on my head nor whisker harmed !
Hooting and hollering with joy in freedom !
;D
StreetsOfGold
18th October 2016, 06:34 AM
There should be DISTINCTION, between MEN and WOMAN!
Men should be easily recognized as such and so should woman.
A "THING" which appears as it could be EITHER is an abomination in the sight of God (and sane rational men/woman)
Dogman
18th October 2016, 06:42 AM
There should be DISTINCTION, between MEN and WOMAN!
Men should be easily recognized as such and so should woman.
A "THING" which appears as it could be EITHER is an abomination in the sight of God (and sane rational men/woman) There is a distinction men can grow beards ;D tho some woman try to but never make it, or spend countless hours in front of a mirror plucking their whiskers. Hoot ! ;D
But surly a truth !
May I respectively suggest that you take your head and do the impossible and stick your head up your ass and inhale deeply please ? Your idiotic bible thumping and world view does get tiring !
;D
StreetsOfGold
18th October 2016, 06:54 AM
There is a distinction men can grow beards ;D tho some woman try to but never make it, or spend countless hours in front of a mirror plucking their whiskers. Hoot ! ;D
But surly a truth !
May I respectively suggest that you take your head and do the impossible and stick your head up your ass and inhale deeply please ? Your idiotic bible thumping and world view does get tiring !
;D
My view on men and women with distinctions (which you seem to respect) CAME FROM THE BIBLE!!
Dogman
18th October 2016, 06:56 AM
My view on men and women with distinctions (which you seem to respect) CAME FROM THE BIBLE!! Written by man and driven at the time by mans (political driven by Constantine, the empire builder) need and desire to control and unify the masses and also conquer territory for power and wealth, for same said empire/emperor...
Along with the other asshats that followed his template, for power/prestige and wealth..
Are you inhaling yet ?
;D
Shami-Amourae
18th October 2016, 07:00 AM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1476/79/1476798230018.jpg
StreetsOfGold
18th October 2016, 08:15 AM
Written (PENNED not "written") by man and driven at the time by mans (political driven by Constantine, the empire builder)
Constantine? What does he have to do with the Bible?
ZERO!
Constantine? What does he have to do with Christianity?
ZERO!!
He WAS an important character in STARTING the Roman Catholic church, YES, true, but he had nothing whatsoever to do with the Bible OR Christianity!
What are YOU sniffing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tMvcBukXL4
Dogman
18th October 2016, 09:03 AM
Constantine? What does he have to do with the Bible?
ZERO!
Constantine? What does he have to do with Christianity?
ZERO!!
He WAS an important character in STARTING the Roman Catholic church, YES, true, but he had nothing whatsoever to do with the Bible OR Christianity!
What are YOU sniffing?
YouTube Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tMvcBukXL4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tMvcBukXL4)
ROTFLMAO !
Pull your skirt down, you are flashing to the world, you're ignorance more so now than normally for you !
Hoot !
;D
Btw
Take deep breaths !
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Forum runner
PatColo
18th October 2016, 10:51 AM
It is called manscaping. You guys don't manscaping?
Queen Hellary replied to my manly/au natural dick pic, saying she couldn't see my frank & beans well enough in the tall grass; asked me to trim and send her another. So I did of course, and she replied she loves it and wanted to grab me by it, without my consent...?! :o
I took screen caps of all this as proof; but this was 11 years ago and many comp's ago; who knew what gold it would be TODAY?! :(
Hillary Clinton Asked for Dick Pic from Lenny Kravitz
Mark Dice 179,746 views
Subscribe
603,455
5K
380
Published on Oct 13, 2016Hillary Clinton caught on tape asking for a dick from of rocker Lenny Kravitz. During an interview with Lena Dunham, she brought up Lenny's wardrobe malfunction where his manhood fell out of his pants on stage, and Hillary Clinton asked if she could have a picture of Lenny's penis. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.
2.5 mins
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tOOc-toJkdE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOOc-toJkdE
ximmy
18th October 2016, 11:16 AM
Constantine? What does he have to do with the Bible?
ZERO!
Constantine? What does he have to do with Christianity?
ZERO!!
He WAS an important character in STARTING the Roman Catholic church, YES, true, but he had nothing whatsoever to do with the Bible OR Christianity!
What are YOU sniffing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tMvcBukXL4
The Bibles of Constantine
There is another piece of evidence that bears on the subject of the canon - even though we may not know how to interpret it. About the year 322 CE, the emperor Constantine, wishing to promote and organize Christian worship in the growing number of churches in Constantinople, directed Eusebius (http://www.ntcanon.org/Eusebius.shtml) to have 50 copies of the sacred Scriptures made by practiced scribes and written legibly on prepared parchment. At the same time the emperor informed him, in a letter still preserved to us, that everything necessary for doing this was placed at his command, among other things two public carriages for conveying the completed manuscripts to the emperor for his personal inspection. According to Eusebius:
Such were the emperor's commands, which were followed by the immediate execution of the work itself, which we sent him in magnificent and elaborately bound volumes of a threefold and fourfold form. (Vita Const. 4.36.37)
Some have suggested that the codex Sinaiticus (http://www.ntcanon.org/codex_Sinaiticus.shtml) is one of the 50 bibles commissioned by Constantine
The world’s oldest bible dates to the 4th century AD and has only been lent by the British Library once before, in 1990, again to the British Museum when the two shared the same building. The Codex is handwritten in Greek and contains the earliest complete manuscript of the New Testament.
http://www.ancientpages.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/oldestbiblelent3.jpg (http://www.ancientpages.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/oldestbiblelent3.jpg)The Codex Sinaiticus is one of the most important books in the world and has only been lent once, in 1990 – also to the British Museum – when both collections shared the same building.
It was bought from the Soviet Union in 1933 and an online version has been available since 2009 thanks to a collaboration between the four institutions that hold different parts of the manuscript, i.e. the British Library, the Monastery of St Catherine on Mount Sinai, the University Library of Leipzig and the National Library of Russia, St Petersburg.
http://www.ancientpages.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/oldestbiblelent2.jpg (http://www.ancientpages.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/oldestbiblelent2.jpg)A Codex Sinaiticus manuscript, right, the earliest complete New Testament, from 4th century Egypt or Judea on display in the ‘Sacred: Discover what we share’ exhibition at the British Library in London, Wednesday, April 25, 2007 (AP Photo/Sang Tan).
The Codex is thought to have been written by four different scribes and includes 27,000 corrections. Dr Scot McKendrick, head of western manuscripts at the Library, said: “This is a very beautiful and fine book, but it also has all this activity going on its margins and between lines, all over the place really”. The book has been the prototype for every subsequent Christian Bible.
singular_me
18th October 2016, 12:33 PM
dont see anything wrong with that, body waxing/shaving is a very ancient practice... in almost all cultures.
The problem is the agenda but doing it is not wrong in itself. It seems like body waxing and shaving have remained a homosexual underground trend for decades or even centuries but in the antiquity for example, it was a common practice among the middle and rich classes. There still are even some remote tribes doing this nowadays.
Just like long hair for men, throughout history men have had more often long hair than short. I love long hair for men ;D
Neuro
18th October 2016, 12:45 PM
Constantine? What does he have to do with the Bible?
ZERO!
Constantine? What does he have to do with Christianity?
ZERO!!
He WAS an important character in STARTING the Roman Catholic church, YES, true, but he had nothing whatsoever to do with the Bible OR Christianity!
What are YOU sniffing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tMvcBukXL4
Why does that video cuts off in the middle of an argument, and why can't a continuation be found?
ximmy
18th October 2016, 12:49 PM
Kramer: Don't you know you're not supposed to poke around down there.
Jerry: Well women do it.
Kramer: (high pitched voice) "Well women do it." I'll tell you what. I'll pick you up a sundress and a parasol and you can just (high pitched voice) sashey your pretty little self around the town square.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuboJiAUMd8
StreetsOfGold
18th October 2016, 05:08 PM
Why does that video cuts off in the middle of an argument, and why can't a continuation be found?
You needed to know where to look
Here it is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_UCZf8pDZM
and for those who have the time and inclination to actually learn something, here is the FULL video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmXBj2N9fhY
crimethink
18th October 2016, 05:13 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_UCZf8pDZM
The Inquisition was created to deal with the Satanic influence of the Jews.
StreetsOfGold
18th October 2016, 05:29 PM
The book has been the prototype for every subsequent Christian Bible.
Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are the most FOUL UP Satanic pieces of garbage ever dumped upon the Christian world.
They are PURE, unadulterated Roman Catholic and have NOTHING whatsoever to do with THE Bible in English, which is the King James Bible. (Based on the MAJORITY of TEXT!!!!)
All others (hundreds of them) are ALL based, primarily, on these TWO manuscripts i.e. Bible counterfeits
The prime man responsible is Origen, the man who most likely WROTE Vaticanus and these men, Westcott and Hort who brought these two manuscripts BACK into the world of manuscript evidence (after having been rejected for hundreds of years) and FOOLED the public by NOT releasing the SOURCE of this TEXT (which was these two manuscripts) soon enough for a critical look before releasing the FIRST "Bible" BASED UPON THEM (revised version (RV) of 1880) which USED these and was SOLD AS a "protestant" Bible to FOOL the public (they removed the apocryphal books which ARE PART of the text!)
ximmy
18th October 2016, 05:50 PM
Umm.. wake up. king james comes from bishops and geneva, bishops and geneva come from great, matthew and coverdale. coverdale comes from tyndale
about 90 percent of king james is tyndale
Tyndale comes from Erasmus
A little bit on Erasmus greek testament:
The actual texts utilized by Erasmus for his Greek testament are a bit of a mystery. Different writers say different things. It is agreed that Erasmus had ten man scripts: four from England, five from Basle, and one borrowed from his friend John Reuchlin.10 (http://vintage.aomin.org/erasmus.html#1-20) Reuchlin’s codex seemed to Erasmus the oldest, though it is actually from the 10th or 12th century. It represented the best of the available codices, yet Erasmus distrusted it, and utilized it only for the book of Revelation. Erasmus wrote to Reuchlin in August of 1514 and said,
"It is also my intention to see to the printing of the New Testament in Greek, with my own annotations added. They say that you have an eminently correct copy of this [New Testament in Greek], and if you would lend it to John Froben you will do a favor not only to him and to me, but also to all the studious. Your copy, intact and unstained, will be returned to you."11 (http://vintage.aomin.org/erasmus.html#1-20)
Faludy states that this codex is still extant.12 (http://vintage.aomin.org/erasmus.html#1-20)
As to the identification of the other manuscripts used, opinions differ. Phillips says “which they were is now unknown."13 (http://vintage.aomin.org/erasmus.html#1-20) However, Allen identifies one of the four from England as “the Leicester Codex written by Emmanuel of Constantinople" and that it was with the Franciscans at Cambridge by the early sixteenth century.14 (http://vintage.aomin.org/erasmus.html#1-20) It was undoubtedly this and three others that Erasmus worked on while at Cambridge. Becoming unsettled in England in 1514, he packed up his belongings, (one square wooden box and three leather-covered trunks)15 (http://vintage.aomin.org/erasmus.html#1-20) including the work he had done on the New Testament, and headed for Basle, arriving in mid-August 1514. He hoped to find manuscripts at Basle that were nearly ready for publication.
Instead, he found five manuscripts. He was disappointed with their quality, especially since this would require him to do more work than he planned. The second best codex available to him he found at Basle - but again, Erasmus used it little, for he felt it had been tampered with and brought into conformity with the Vulgate text (which was not true). Hence the two best sources in his hands went predominately unused. He knew of the great Vaticanus manuscript, but it was at Rome and out of reach. As for the other manuscripts at Basle, he used two inferior manuscripts from the monastic library at Basle. One was of the Gospels, and still today has Erasmus’s corrections visible and the other of Acts and the Epistles. Metzger dates them as from the twelfth century.16 (http://vintage.aomin.org/erasmus.html#1-20) He compared these with a few others. Only Reuchlin’s text contained the book of Revelation, and he was forced to utilize it at that point.
Hence, Erasmus’s first edition was based on ten manuscripts, none of which could be called exceedingly “ancient,” and even at that he basically ignored the two best exemplars before him. That despite this his text was relatively good is more a witness to the preservation of the Scriptures over time than the (admittedly) great scholarship of Erasmus.
Doesn't sound too divine or miraculous does it?
midnight rambler
18th October 2016, 06:20 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cms9LQLUcAA-tzH.jpg
midnight rambler
18th October 2016, 06:22 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8HrMhvG_10
midnight rambler
18th October 2016, 06:23 PM
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/10/19/arts/19BEAUTYBOYS2-1476815156922/19BEAUTYBOYS2-1476815156922-master315.jpg
EE_
18th October 2016, 06:26 PM
Kramer: Don't you know you're not supposed to poke around down there.
Jerry: Well women do it.
Kramer: (high pitched voice) "Well women do it." I'll tell you what. I'll pick you up a sundress and a parasol and you can just (high pitched voice) sashey your pretty little self around the town square.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuboJiAUMd8
Classic Kramer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoLPLsQbdt0
Cebu_4_2
18th October 2016, 06:46 PM
Remove your leg, chest and pubic hair the manly way, use a propane torch 5-6 inches away as you look in a mirror (not too close or you could stop the flame). If you flinch you are not a man, if you don't flinch you are a hairless blistered irredemable man. Please record your results and post the video for professional reaction.
Joshua01
19th October 2016, 08:07 AM
This whole thread are chock full of examples as to why the world is a fucked up place and how much work it will take to cleanse the mess
crimethink
19th October 2016, 08:32 AM
Remove your leg, chest and pubic hair the manly way, use a propane torch 5-6 inches away as you look in a mirror (not too close or you could stop the flame). If you flinch you are not a man, if you don't flinch you are a hairless blistered irredemable man. Please record your results and post the video for professional reaction.
This guy would:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWvBVXpIqo
Cebu_4_2
19th October 2016, 10:36 AM
This guy would:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWvBVXpIqo
Did you listen to this guy talking? LOL
feels better than her blowjobs
Neuro
19th October 2016, 11:03 PM
This guy would:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cWvBVXpIqo
I think the guy doing the tattoo removal may also be his dental surgeon and anesthesiologist apart from a car mechanic, a true renaissance man...
Cebu_4_2
20th October 2016, 06:00 AM
I think the guy doing the tattoo removal may also be his dental surgeon and anesthesiologist apart from a car mechanic, a true renaissance man...
He kept asking for them to pour alcohol on it between bouts...
Hitch
21st October 2016, 08:38 PM
I've got a funny story, thought I'd bump this thread. I was getting ready for work a few days ago, night shift, 6 pm to 6 am. I put my left leg into my work pants...and I felt it. A thread in my workpants caught a toenail just right, and rip. I felt the toenail rip out. I thought, this isn't good. Pulled my leg out, and saw a toenail sticking straight up with blood pouring out. The whole nail was gone, I had to cut it off with a knife, then bandage it up. I was surprised at the amount of blood. But, I wasn't late for work.
So, I've got one toe that's a mess, with no nail. I'm surprised this doesn't bother me. I think that would bother a lot of people. The people I've told that to, all cringe in disgust. Except my coworkers, they laughed their ass off.
Cebu_4_2
21st October 2016, 10:05 PM
How the fuck, can a toenail be just hanging by a thread? Must have been 100% non functional in the first place.
Hitch
21st October 2016, 10:28 PM
How the fuck, can a toenail be just hanging by a thread? Must have been 100% non functional in the first place.
The toenail was normal. The 'thread' was the part of the pants that lifted the nail completely off. It got under the nail and just ripped her off...
Cebu_4_2
21st October 2016, 10:43 PM
The toenail was normal. The 'thread' was the part of the pants that lifted the nail completely off. It got under the nail and just ripped her off...
Idono man, you could probably put a rope under my toenail and I could walk up from it. My shit is somehow part of my toe.
Hitch
21st October 2016, 10:56 PM
Idono man, you could probably put a rope under my toenail and I could walk up from it. My shit is somehow part of my toe.
The nail takes part of your toe when it rips off. It ain't pretty. It's a bloody mess, tbh.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.