PDA

View Full Version : Dakota Access Pipeline Protests



Shami-Amourae
28th October 2016, 12:24 AM
>In North Dakota, FeatherNigger leaders from the Standing Rock Nation are fighting the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). This pipeline will carry over a half a million barrels of oil per day from the Bakken Oil Shale Fields. The route the pipeline will take, if approved, will be laid under multiple bodies of water, to include the Missouri River located a half mile upstream from the Standing Rock reservation. This river not only supplies drinking water to the tribe but is a major tributary to the Mississippi River where more than 10 million people depend on it for both human consumption and irrigation for the nation’s “bread basket.” This pipeline when it fails – and it will fail – will destroy land and water with little, if any, chance of remediation / cleanup. We only need to look at the devastating Yellowstone River, Kalamazoo, and many others. Protesters have continued to resist construction peacefully, despite surveillance and intimidation from the state. Click here to learn more – find out how you can join them – support them – and spread the word of this historic coming together of many nations to protect our precious water for the next Seven Generations.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfPbIkJa4UI

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/94883218

Shami-Amourae
28th October 2016, 12:25 AM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1477/62/1477620681033.jpg

Environmentalists burning tires to protest the Dakota access pipeline

>Environmentalists burning tires


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cv0n-aEUAAE4Vjw.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cv0n-aDVYAA3LPS.jpg

Shami-Amourae
28th October 2016, 12:27 AM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1477/60/1477609370218.jpg



Check out the Twitter hashtag for all the updates. This is shockingly very big stuff like the Bundy Ranch, except they are actually violent, and getting away with it since Muh Beads.

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NoDAPL

Shami-Amourae
28th October 2016, 12:36 AM
http://oi64.tinypic.com/ace4cg.jpg

http://oi63.tinypic.com/316xfvc.jpg

Shami-Amourae
28th October 2016, 12:56 AM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cv1uD-3XYAE4svq.jpg:large

Tumbleweed
28th October 2016, 04:18 AM
I don't know much about the issues on this pipeline but have just started looking in to it a little. Sounds to me like trouble started when the white people in Bismarck got the route of the pipeline changed because they were afraid of an oil spill fucking up their drinking water supply.

They got the route changed so it would fuck up the indians water supply and not theirs if a spill were to happen. Good drinking water west of the Missouri River is always a concern.





http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/understanding-controversy-behind-dakota-access-pipeline-180960450/?no-ist (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/understanding-controversy-behind-dakota-access-pipeline-180960450/?no-ist)

The controversial Dakota Access Pipeline (http://www.daplpipelinefacts.com/resources/faq.html) continues to make headlines. Yesterday, Energy Transfer Partners (http://www.daplpipelinefacts.com/), the developer behind the $3.8 billion proposed project (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/the-latest-south-dakota-tribe-files-lawsuit-over-pipeline/2016/09/08/65f1b324-762c-11e6-9781-49e591781754_story.html) issued a memo to employees that the pipeline is nearly 60 percent complete, but did not respond to the Obama administration’s recent request for the company to voluntarily halt construction on the project on federal land. The memo did, however, say that the company's CEO plans to meet with federal officials and stated that the project would go forward.

Obama’s statement came after the U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg ruled (http://earthjustice.org/sites/default/files/files/order-denying-PI.pdf) on Friday that the Army Corps “likely complied” with its obligation to consult the Standing Rock Sioux (http://standingrock.org/).

The Standing Rock Sioux opposes the pipeline (http://sacredstonecamp.org/resolution/)'s construction near the Sioux reservation on the grounds that it threatens their public health and welfare, water supply and cultural resources. What began as a small protest camp in April on the Standing Rock reservation has since morphed into an encampment with over 1,000 people. Over the past few months, the Sacred Stone Camp (https://www.facebook.com/CampOfTheSacredStone/about/?entry_point=page_nav_about_item&tab=page_info), as it is now called, has been the site of a number of antagonistic face offs between protesters and the oil company.

In July, they filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in federal district court asking for a preliminary injunction stopping construction of the pipeline. The lawsuit contends two broad issues, as described on the Standing Rock Sioux’s website (http://standingrock.org/data/upfiles/media/STANDING%20ROCK%20LITIGATION%20FAQ%20FINAL%20(1).p df):


“First, the pipeline would pass under the Missouri River (at Lake Oahe) just a half a mile upstream of the Tribe’s reservation boundary, where a spill would be culturally and economically catastrophic. Second, the pipeline would pass through areas of great cultural significance, such as sacred sites and burials that federal law seeks to protect.”


While the judge did not grant the injunction, a number of federal agencies, including the Justice Department, the Department of the Army and the Interior Department halted construction on all lands of significance to the Standing Rock Sioux following the decision.
As reported by NPR (http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/09/09/493280504/judge-rules-that-construction-can-proceed-on-dakota-access-pipeline), the agencies stated (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/joint-statement-department-justice-department-army-and-department-interior-regarding-standing):


“The Army will not authorize constructing the Dakota Access pipeline on Corps land bordering or under Lake Oahe until it can determine whether it will need to reconsider any of its previous decisions regarding the Lake Oahe site under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or other federal laws.”


As Bill McKibben explains for the New Yorker (http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/a-pipeline-fight-and-americas-dark-past), the pipeline was originally supposed to cross the Missouri River near Bismarck, but it was moved over concerns that an oil spill at that location would have wrecked the state capital’s drinking water. As a result, the pipeline was shifted to a crossing half a mile from the reservation.

The Standing Rock Sioux maintains that the government did not properly consult with them prior to shifting the pipeline’s route, and that the new crossing would entail destruction of sacred spots and old burial grounds. Dave Archambault II, chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux says they plan to appeal the judge's ruling, KFYR News reports (http://www.kfyrtv.com/content/news/Dakota-Access-Pipeline-Decision--392900931.html).

If completed, the pipeline will span nearly 1,200 miles, connecting the Bakken and Three Forks oil production areas in North Dakota to a river port in Patoka, Illinois. Developers say it would have the capability to “transport 470,000 barrels of crude oil per day (with a growth potential up to 570,000 barrels per day).”
As relayed in a memo to employees (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas-energy-transfer-partners-memo-dakota-access-pipeline/), the company insists that “concerns about the pipeline’s impact on the local water supply are unfounded.”


The contentious showdown has come to represent a battleground over larger philosophical and ideological issues. As one protester tells Jeff Brady for NPR (http://www.npr.org/2016/09/12/493532162/n-d-pipeline-protester-its-about-our-rights-as-native-people), “It's about our rights as native people to this land. It's about our rights to worship. It's about our rights to be able to call a place home, and it's our rights to water.”

The federal government, which has asked the pipeline company to voluntarily pause work for 20 miles on either side of Lake Oahe, has not said how long it plans to shutdown pipeline construction.

goldleaf
28th October 2016, 05:05 AM
There is some pretty good conversation about this on the AgTalk forum. Conversation from folks actually living in the area. Cattle being butchered and let out. Trespassing is rampant on private property, all the while claiming it's their land. They obviously don't understand adverse possession law.

I think that radio station out of Bismarck is the one I've been listening to online. There's a good program on daily at 9am with callers describing the situation.

Tumbleweed
28th October 2016, 05:17 AM
There is some pretty good conversation about this on the AgTalk forum. Conversation from folks actually living in the area. Cattle being butchered and let out. Trespassing is rampant on private property, all the while claiming it's their land. They obviously don't understand adverse possession law.

I think that radio station out of Bismarck is the one I've been listening to online. There's a good program on daily at 9am with callers describing the situation.

Have you got a link to that forum and the discussion?

goldleaf
28th October 2016, 05:34 AM
It's newagtalk.com. You have to be registered to see the political discussion, but well worth it, lots of farmers and ranchers with pretty good heads.

goldleaf
28th October 2016, 05:43 AM
The radio station is KFYR 550 am out of Bismarck. You can listen live on the internet. I've been listening in the morning at 9.

crimethink
28th October 2016, 07:02 AM
Firewater swillers fail to understand the oil is going to be transported whether they like it or not. Either by rail, where tank cars can end up in the river and/or burn/explode, or, via a pipeline that can be computer-managed (and shut-off), greatly reducing the risk to water sources.

The BN line crosses the Missouri River at Mandan/Bismarck. A spill into the river there ends up in Lake Oahe.

www.bnsf.com/customers/pdf/maps/carload_map.pdf

The oil simply cannot get to market without crossing the Missouri River watershed, somewhere.

These fucks, especially the leftists like Shailene Woodley, are against anything that makes America strong. They spew endless bullshit about "protecting the Earth," yet have no problem using aircraft and road transportation. Just how did "African-American" Woodley get to North Dakota? Walking? And the Injuns don't consider the petroleum needed to produce the grain which made their liquor.

Tumbleweed
28th October 2016, 07:34 AM
I didn't sign up at that AgTalk forum but was able to see a couple of threads about the protest in North Dakota. No useful information in them though.

I've done some browsing looking for info and what it looks like to me is that the environmental, global warming crowd are using the indians to try and stop the development of all coal and oil use for energy. I believe the indians do have some legitimate concerns though when it comes to having access to clean water and not polluting it with oil. There are pipelines that provide water for small white and indian communities and the reservations west of the missouri river. Those pipelines not only supply water for the people living there but also water for livestock grazing the grasslands which is a big source of their income.

I don't know how big a problem an oil spill in the missouri river would be if it were to occur but the people in Bismarck were worried enough about it to get the route of the pipeline changed so it would be down stream from them. Communities and the reservation near where I live do depend on water from the missouri river for themselves and livestock. Maybe if they were to have a spill they could just dump some corexit in it to fix it like they did in the Gulf of Mexico a few years ago.

The route of the Dakota Access pipline isn't anywhere near where I live but the route chosen for the Keystone pipline is. It crosses the watershed that I depend on for livestock water. The water I depend on tends to be high in sulphates anyway and in dry years when there's not enough rain to dilute it can become poisonous enough to kill livestock. Add some oil to that and it will make it worse.

No one that I know of in the area where I live is really against building pipelines but they don't want there water sources destroyed because that will put them out of business. What I've heard in the past when these issues were coming up was that the company building the pipeline was going to build it lighter than the Alaskan pipeline. The pressure would be higher in this pipeline because the oil is thicker. The oil would have more sand in it and be more abrasive than the oil was in the Alaskan pipeline with more danger of it grinding away the inner surface of the pipe, thinning it and increasing the danger of a spill. The company that was building it wanted to walk away from it after they were done with no responsibility for spills or the damage they cause.

It sounds to me like there will be millions or billions of dollars made by bankers, corporations and politicians working for them. I'm ok with them building the pipelines but if they have a spill they better take responsibility for it and spend the money they plan on making to clean up their messes when they do instead of the workers and tax payers of this country doing it for them while the elite keep all their millions and billions.

Shami-Amourae
4th November 2016, 04:48 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1_UXEjiRjo

cheka.
4th November 2016, 04:54 PM
doesn't make sense when looking at this...something else is up. possible monied interests on both sides employing actors and dupes


http://www.sawyoo.com/postpic/2010/10/oil-and-gas-pipeline-map-united-states_414664.jpg

Tumbleweed
4th November 2016, 05:57 PM
^ cheka it does make sense when your livelihood depends on having a clean supply of water. When you cross the Missouri river the west begins on the west side of it. Good water west of the missuori is not easy to come by and the climate is drier with less rainfall. Mark Twain made the observation that in the west "whiskey is for drinkin and water is for fightin over".

From what I've heard in the past the fracking has caused a lot of problems for people living in the area of the Bakken oil field. It has polluted the ground water and streams. An oil spill from a pipeline has the potential to pollute the water in the missouri river and cause more problems not only for people in north dakata but south dakota as well. Generally the people living in the areas of the Bakken oil field and the areas crossed by a pipeline would not benefit from the pipeline monetarily but their drinking water for themselves and their livestock can or is being affected.


A couple of videos here with some food for thought.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jN_YwQp4pzY





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ApZkNsXfJE

cheka.
4th November 2016, 09:36 PM
once they get enough easements they go to court and win imminent domain. never pays to be first to give easement....wait and double/quadruple your money

https://thinkprogress.org/for-profit-pipelines-are-growing-and-so-are-eminent-domain-battles-2b8beee7af3c#.sbqrl3ofo

For-Profit Pipelines Are Growing And So Are Eminent Domain Battles

Yet since the Bakken pipeline mostly avoids wildlife, it has become an example of how for-profit developers in need of private property ignite disputes when awarded the controversial use of eminent domain. Eminent domain is the governmental power to take private property for public use in return for fair-market compensation. The government usually uses eminent domain to build bridges or freeways, though oil and gas companies have often benefited from this power in the past, particularly during the first pipeline development surge of the 1950s.

No governmental agency gathers data on eminent domain permits given to corporations, but experts said a new wave of pipeline investment is pitting landowners against corporations and regulators in growing numbers, and the trend will likely continue. “The conventional wisdom is that we are having more [eminent domain controversies] in recent years because of the oil and natural gas boom,” Ilya Somin, professor at the George Mason University School of Law, told ThinkProgress. With that growing tension in hand, regulators, lawmakers, and courts in various states are being pushed to probe eminent domain requests for pipeline build out like never before; in some cases, like in South Carolina, bans are being approved.

In Iowa, however, there is no indications oil pipelines are falling out of favor with the government. Republican Governor Terry Branstad has long said he supports the use of eminent domain in some circumstances for pipeline projects. And on Monday, the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) — the last state agency to rule on the matter — gave Dakota Access a green light to begin construction where it has the necessary permits, although the developer is still waiting for a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit that’s been delayed over the project’s potential impact on a Sioux site in northwest Iowa. Meanwhile, construction of the 1,168-mile-long Bakken pipeline — a line comparable in length to the Keystone XL — has begun in North Dakota, South Dakota, and Illinois.

“We currently have 96 percent of the pipeline route across the four states secured with easements,” said Vicky Granado, spokeswoman for Dakota Access, in an email to ThinkProgress. Construction is expected to be completed later this year. “Our schedule has not changed,” she said.

Shami-Amourae
21st November 2016, 08:52 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ0nHQupv3c

Cebu_4_2
21st November 2016, 11:26 AM
Nothing better to do but rape the land and people.

Shami-Amourae
21st November 2016, 11:39 AM
Nothing better to do but rape the land and people.

>Implying PraireNiggers are people

https://s13.postimg.org/bfplo7vsn/1450583499480.jpg

Atocha
21st November 2016, 11:51 AM
Nothing better to do but rape the land and people.

Amen to that!

I live very close to the Trinity River in what is known as "Kaufman County".

In the last 2 years, Gravel and Sand pits have exploded in this area. There are expecting approx 700 trucks a day on a small highway running between Ennis And Kaufman. Highway 34 to be exact.

My wife looked at this one day and said we continue to Rape the land and never give back.

Many families such as mine, depend on the groundwater for our wells. We are constantly fighting them and we have kept them out of out town but they are always trying to circumvent laws with money and politicians.

These people in the Dakotas are fighting a losing battle. You can not stop Progress with Big Money Behind it.

They try but Big Money wins most of the time if not all the time.

A sad situation.

Atocha
21st November 2016, 12:01 PM
Firewater swillers fail to understand the oil is going to be transported whether they like it or not. Either by rail, where tank cars can end up in the river and/or burn/explode, or, via a pipeline that can be computer-managed (and shut-off), greatly reducing the risk to water sources.

The BN line crosses the Missouri River at Mandan/Bismarck. A spill into the river there ends up in Lake Oahe.

www.bnsf.com/customers/pdf/maps/carload_map.pdf

The oil simply cannot get to market without crossing the Missouri River watershed, somewhere.

These fucks, especially the leftists like Shailene Woodley, are against anything that makes America strong. They spew endless bullshit about "protecting the Earth," yet have no problem using aircraft and road transportation. Just how did "African-American" Woodley get to North Dakota? Walking? And the Injuns don't consider the petroleum needed to produce the grain which made their liquor.

I agree but then this happened to us.

Google Koch Pipeline, Lively, Texas, We lived through that... My friend's Daughter didn't nor did my son's friend.

The pipeline was and is still there. They were negligent in Maintenance.

Tumbleweed has great concerns. Sand is abrasive. This pipeline cutting through watershed and above aquifers is cause for alarm.

In reality, I moved completely away from pipelines whether they are LPG or oil. I do not want to go through that again.. Ever

Shami-Amourae
21st November 2016, 12:02 PM
Amen to that!

I live very close to the Trinity River in what is known as "Kaufman County".

In the last 2 years, Gravel and Sand pits have exploded in this area. There are expecting approx 700 trucks a day on a small highway running between Ennis And Kaufman. Highway 34 to be exact.

My wife looked at this one day and said we continue to Rape the land and never give back.

Many families such as mine, depend on the groundwater for our wells. We are constantly fighting them and we have kept them out of out town but they are always trying to circumvent laws with money and politicians.

These people in the Dakotas are fighting a losing battle. You can not stop Progress with Big Money Behind it.

They try but Big Money wins most of the time if not all the time.

A sad situation.


https://s22.postimg.org/r549u3r1t/1473547365801.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/s7egcn9v1/)

https://s22.postimg.org/6z0rv7ve9/oil_train_safety_9c4758dd4131c6fa.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/cafofxhgt/)

https://s22.postimg.org/w6bnvgyi9/warren_buffett_bnsf_rail_map.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/q5dyyebvx/)

>Big Money
:rolleyes:

crimethink
21st November 2016, 01:36 PM
https://s22.postimg.org/r549u3r1t/1473547365801.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/s7egcn9v1/)

Holy shit, I should have thought of that angle, being a lifelong railfan!

BN doesn't have exclusive connection to western Canada (e.g., Alberta), but it's close enough.

Tumbleweed
21st November 2016, 04:24 PM
I've been looking in to this fight a little and there is cause for concern about the water. The white people in Bismarck raised hell about the pipeline crossing at Bismarck because of their fear of an oil spill contaminating their water supply. When they raised hell it sounds like they got it moved near the Res a half mile above where the indians draw their water out of the Missouri river. The indians should have been paying attention and raised hell then about it but they didn't. I think it's to late to change much.

I've read some reports of engineers for the corps of engineers that say it's safe but other engineers who say it's not. One from Texas that works with companies building pipelines in Texas says it's not safe in the areas they're building it. There is a danger of landslides in the area going down to the river and the pipe isn't heavy enough to withstand one. Areas along the river do have landslides and I've seen them and they also occur where I live.

An engineer from Texas says they should build the pipe heavier and maybe encase it in cement if they can't move to a safer place to cross the river. I've also read that the monitoring is kind of hit and miss with the pipeline company using these pipelines. There have been oil spills in Canada and Minnesota or Wisconsin by the company operating these pipelines. One of them cost close to two billion to clean up.

I think the best bet for the indians is to negotiate a deal with the pipeline companies. Build it safe and take responsibility for all the costs of a spill and all the damage it might cause. Pay all damages out of the profits of the companies that built and operate the pipeline and the assets of the engineers that designed it. If it's really as safe as they claim I can't see why the companies and their engineers wouldn't want to take responsibility for it and guarantee it's safety with all of their company and personal assets.

The Keystone pipeline passes near my land and it was my neighbors who negotiated and signed easements for them to build the pipeline. I didn't have any say in it. I will be impacted though if there is a spill. Where the pipeline crosses Nebraska it crosses the Oglala aquifer in the sandhills. If there's a spill there it can't be cleaned up. That aquifer is like an under ground ocean of clean fresh water in an arid land.

Shami-Amourae
21st November 2016, 04:26 PM
Holy shit, I should have thought of that angle, being a lifelong railfan!

BN doesn't have exclusive connection to western Canada (e.g., Alberta), but it's close enough.

The entire anti-pipeline movement has been funded by Warren Buffet.

Horn
21st November 2016, 05:15 PM
The entire anti-pipeline movement has been funded by Warren Buffet.

And to end when enough position in pipeline shares have been added.

It most likely comes down to engineering money spent to secure the line, of which the privateers in the end can pass off to some .gov supplement tax (ie: taxpayers not Indians) the more Indians revolt the better the chance .gov or investor settlement flips the bill to improve.

JohnQPublic
21st November 2016, 06:07 PM
https://s22.postimg.org/r549u3r1t/1473547365801.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/s7egcn9v1/)



I've seen these long lines of oil cars coming through Houston (2014/2015 time frame). It is quite amazing, They seem to never stop.

JohnQPublic
21st November 2016, 06:09 PM
Officers douse North Dakota pipeline protesters in subfreezing weather (http://kpic.com/news/nation-world/officers-douse-north-dakota-pipeline-protesters-in-subfreezing-weather)


Authorities on Monday defended their decision to douse protesters with water during a skirmish in subfreezing weather near the Dakota Access oil pipeline, and organizers said at least 17 protesters were taken to the hospital — including some who were treated for hypothermia.

Atocha
21st November 2016, 06:40 PM
Officers douse North Dakota pipeline protesters in subfreezing weather (http://kpic.com/news/nation-world/officers-douse-north-dakota-pipeline-protesters-in-subfreezing-weather)


Authorities on Monday defended their decision to douse protesters with water during a skirmish in subfreezing weather near the Dakota Access oil pipeline, and organizers said at least 17 protesters were taken to the hospital — including some who were treated for hypothermia.

They always defend their position because it needs defence. They are assholes.

crimethink
21st November 2016, 10:55 PM
Officers douse North Dakota pipeline protesters in subfreezing weather (http://kpic.com/news/nation-world/officers-douse-north-dakota-pipeline-protesters-in-subfreezing-weather)


Authorities on Monday defended their decision to douse protesters with water during a skirmish in subfreezing weather near the Dakota Access oil pipeline, and organizers said at least 17 protesters were taken to the hospital — including some who were treated for hypothermia.


Although (Dallas Goldtooth, an organizer with the Indigenous Environmental Network) said a water cannon was used to douse the protesters, Morton County Sheriff's spokesman Rob Keller denied that. Keller said a tactical vehicle spraying tear gas has been mistaken by some people as a water cannon.

Keller did confirm that water hoses owned by the Mandan Rural Fire Department were used to put out fires set by protesters and to turn back protesters during a violent clash that was "rapidly unfolding."

"Water hoses were used to keep distance between officers and criminal agitators and also to put out fires set by those agitators," he said.


So, it appears the (all-volunteer) firemen were there to stop Bolshevik tactics, and the firemen got fed up with the dangerous behavior, and used them for the secondary purpose, as well.

http://usfiredept.com/mandan-rural-fire-department-13974.html


The "Indigenous Environmental Network" is funded by fine folks like the (((Max & Anna Levinson Foundation))):

http://www.levinsonfoundation.org/

Shami-Amourae
23rd November 2016, 05:07 PM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1479/94/1479944895029.jpg
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/99954708#p99954708

Cebu_4_2
23rd November 2016, 07:46 PM
http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/99954708#p99954708

The unreported war on the american people.

Shami-Amourae
6th December 2016, 08:28 PM
KNEEL WHITE BOI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtvZXvDN03w
>man apologizes for something he didn't do to someone it didn't happen to


http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1400/98/1400988369865.jpg

Tumbleweed
6th December 2016, 08:53 PM
I couldn't watch that video of a guy down on his knees apologizing for the past fights between the whites and indians. I don't know anyone around here that would do something like that. I can't believe the indians would have any respect for someone that would do that either.

Shami-Amourae
6th December 2016, 09:03 PM
I couldn't watch that video of a guy down on his knees apologizing for the past fights between the whites and indians. I don't know anyone around here that would do something like that. I can't believe the indians would have any respect for someone that would do that either.

The comment section is scarier. It's White people trying to out-virtue signal another at how sorry they are, and how brave these men are for cucking to the Listerine drinkers.

Tumbleweed
6th December 2016, 09:20 PM
The comment section is scarier. It's White people trying to out-virtue signal another at how sorry they are and how brave these men are for cucking to the Listerine drinkers.

Generally indians and white ranchers get along pretty well where I live. Ranchers pay them to graze their cattle on the reservation. The indians like the money and it's a lot easier for them not to have to take care of cattle. I can't even imagine anyone in this area who has been around the reservations and indians most of their lives getting down on there knees and apologizing for past conflicts. It ain't going to happen anytime soon either.

One of my uncles gave some indians a ride home trying to help them out. When they got to the reservation they almost beat him to death then stole his money and car and left him for dead. SOB's

Around here instead of listerine they mix Lysol with water and drink it or put fly spray in a paper bag and breath it.

Shami-Amourae
6th December 2016, 09:33 PM
Generally indians and white ranchers get along pretty well where I live. Ranchers pay them to graze their cattle on the reservation. The indians like the money and it's a lot easier for them not to have to take care of cattle. I can't even imagine anyone in this area who has been around the reservations and indians most of their lives getting down on there knees and apologizing for past conflicts. It ain't going to happen anytime soon either.

One of my uncles gave some indians a ride home trying to help them out. When they got to the reservation they almost beat him to death then stole his money and car and left him for dead. SOB's

Around here instead of listerine they mix Lysol with water and drink it or put fly spray in a paper bag and breath it.
We call them Listerine drinkers on 4chan as a joke since they are so addicted to alcohol, that they'll drink anything, even Listerine for a buzz.


https://s15.postimg.org/yi0n4g4kb/180px_Pocahontas_stereotype.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/wq7o9jl7b/)

https://s15.postimg.org/jaknk3cpn/1450583499480.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/c7cs4h79z/)

https://s15.postimg.org/pcsaal15n/1450583588039.jpg (https://postimg.org/image/ppjogrjfb/)

Tumbleweed
6th December 2016, 10:32 PM
The concerns about the dakota access pipeline in North Dakota are similar to the concerns about the Keystone XL pipeline in South Dakota. I'm looking in to it when I have the chance. There may end up being a protest near where I live by indians because the Keystone XL crosses the cheyenne river a little way up river from the cheyenne river reservation.

The route that I travel and the route the indians travel to town is the same and it crosses the cheyenne river. About a year and a half ago there was a land slide and part of the road we travel fell away. It had to be moved and rebuilt. Landslides are common in the areas near the rivers. The concern about landslides causing spills is for real and could cause lots of problems for the locals.

I've found a report by the south dakota public utilities commission that addresses some of these issues about the keystone XL and is probably pretty similar to the concerns of those near the dakota access pipeline.


https://puc.sd.gov/commission/dockets/HydrocarbonPipeline/2014/HP14-001/rstexhibit3060215.pdf

goldleaf
7th December 2016, 02:54 AM
http://talk.newagtalk.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=672917&mid=5677041#M5677041

Shami-Amourae
7th December 2016, 08:24 AM
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1481/12/1481126256233.png

"Today hundreds of veterans from all across the United States, led by Wesley Clark Jr. took a knee and begged for forgiveness for crimes committed toward indigenous people in the name of the United States military. In a moving ceremony led by Arvol Looking Horse, Faith Spotted Eagle, Leonard Crow Dog, Phyllis Young, Ivan Looking Horse and many other natives of Turtle Island, the veterans were forgiven for actions taken to dehumanize the indigenous of this country, and a step towards solidarity has been made.

We stand together as one to defend indigenous rights and Mother Earth. Our journey of solidarity has just begun."

http://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/101914884#p101914884

Cebu_4_2
7th December 2016, 11:33 AM
http://talk.newagtalk.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=672917&mid=5677041#M5677041

Very informative! Like an inside look into how they build the pipeline. Seems pretty secure on land, don't really understand the under the road part. Curious how this works when crossing the river.

crimethink
7th February 2017, 08:45 PM
Sanitation crews work to remove massive amounts of garbage from DAPL protest camp before spring thaw

http://www.kfyrtv.com/content/news/Sanitation-crews-work-to-remove-massive-amounts-of-garbage-from-DAPL-protest-camp-before-spring-thaw-412954433.html