View Full Version : Heated debate on gender pronouns and free speech in Toronto
Shami-Amourae
30th October 2016, 09:05 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiijS_9hPkM
The debate goes on. Here based Peterson is at CBC debating this nutcase of a SJW.
Can you watch this without raging?
http://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/image/1476/81/1476815241997.png
EE_
30th October 2016, 09:22 AM
The reporter and the professor are called 'semen swallowers'. http://f.jwwb.nl/public/r/r/d/temp-quuvcdlqyxxowlfokweb/smiley-blowjob.gif
JohnQPublic
30th October 2016, 09:36 AM
Oh my gosh, some of the students are verging on slight anger. This needs to be stopped immediately.
crimethink
30th October 2016, 10:37 AM
If you possess XX chromosomes, you are a girl.
If you possess XY chromosomes, you are a boy.
If you insist on something else, you are an it.
I will not - ever - use inaccurate pronouns. It's he, she, or it, per the above. Bruce Jenner is still Bruce Jenner, and he can be a he, or an it.
crimethink
30th October 2016, 10:47 AM
The reporter and the professor are called 'semen swallowers'. http://f.jwwb.nl/public/r/r/d/temp-quuvcdlqyxxowlfokweb/smiley-blowjob.gif
No shit. That nu-male talking head would "bristle" at being called "Oriental"? Why?
http://media.backtothefridge.com/images/oriental-flavor.jpg
Made by Japanese-owned Nissin Foods USA.
BTW, that emoticon of yours is utterly disgusting...especially the tongue at the end. LOL
singular_me
30th October 2016, 11:12 AM
GMO foods cause hormonal imbalances, so that is where we have to strike first before anything else.
the topic is well documented on the net, everything is interconnected
EDIT: today I just had to realize they also sell organic baby milk powder that is twice the price of the conventional one. WHO can afford $36/1lb for baby milk powder?
I watched the 5 first mins of that OP vid, just frightening, really
palani
30th October 2016, 11:19 AM
GMO foods cause hormonal imbalances
Food was re-defined in the 1906 Food and Drug Act. By food is meant
http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/ucm148690.htm#sec6
SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.
That the term "drug," as used in this Act, shall include all medicines and preparations recognized in the United States Pharmacopoeia or National Formulary for internal or external use, and any substance or mixture of substances intended to be used for the cure, mitigation, or prevention of disease of either man or other animals. The term "food," as used herein, shall include all articles used for food, drink, confectionery, or condiment by man or other animals, whether simple, mixed, or compound.
However man has been established as that entity who exercises dominion over animals. In other words all the drug laws and all food laws are intended for a man who chooses to be treated as an animal. There is a 1st amendment defense to violating such legislation. Only one man I have heard of has ever used that defense.
Joshua01
30th October 2016, 11:21 AM
I don't have time for this pansy shit! We're making America great again and the type of things will take care of themselves!
singular_me
31st October 2016, 11:03 AM
I watched it 2 times... every time shaking my head in disbelief and sometimes laughing cynically. anybody noticed that the TV anchor has tattooed eyebrows?
7th trump
31st October 2016, 11:52 AM
Food was re-defined in the 1906 Food and Drug Act. By food is meant
However man has been established as that entity who exercises dominion over animals. In other words all the drug laws and all food laws are intended for a man who chooses to be treated as an animal. There is a 1st amendment defense to violating such legislation. Only one man I have heard of has ever used that defense.
Just an Act of Congress.
Has no jurisdiction over "We the People".
All Acts of Congress are territorial in nature.
palani
31st October 2016, 03:08 PM
Just an Act of Congress.
Has no jurisdiction over "We the People".
All Acts of Congress are territorial in nature.
Just the basis for the WAR ON DRUGS!!! Do you realize how many lives have been lost and torn apart based upon this WAR? Far more than were lost in 100 Vietnam conflicts. And on the same topic do you realize how much MONEY changes hands based upon the WAR ON DRUGS? And how many prisons are funded on the SSNs of those incarcerated for drug related crimes?
7th trump
31st October 2016, 05:47 PM
Just the basis for the WAR ON DRUGS!!! Do you realize how many lives have been lost and torn apart based upon this WAR? Far more than were lost in 100 Vietnam conflicts. And on the same topic do you realize how much MONEY changes hands based upon the WAR ON DRUGS? And how many prisons are funded on the SSNs of those incarcerated for drug related crimes?
Money?
What money!?!
My how you change directions. as the wind changes.
FRN's are not money according to you. SSN's is not money either.
So just what are you saying here?
palani
31st October 2016, 06:08 PM
Money?
What money!?!
My how you change directions. as the wind changes.
FRN's are not money according to you. SSN's is not money either.
So just what are you saying here?
It's your fantasy. Why do you wake up and go to work every day?
Do you dream in black and white or color? If you dream in color would I be at fault if I bring up BLUE when my world is black and white?
7th trump
1st November 2016, 04:22 AM
It's your fantasy. Why do you wake up and go to work every day?
Do you dream in black and white or color? If you dream in color would I be at fault if I bring up BLUE when my world is black and white?
But But But.......you said frn's arent money. And you also said its debt, so why do you say "And how many prisons are funded on the SSNs of those incarcerated for drug related crimes?"
Do you even know what you're saying?
Nice how you throw in another internet conspiracy.... "ssn funding scam".
Bahahahahahahaha..............!
Thats what believing in so many conspiracies gets you palani!
They are like lies.....you cant remember all of them.
palani
1st November 2016, 05:11 AM
why do you say "And how many prisons are funded on the SSNs of those incarcerated for drug related crimes?"
YOUR fantasy. What is YOUR explanation?
Twisted Titan
1st November 2016, 06:04 AM
Ding!! Ding!!! Ding!!
Battle Royale!!@!
Dogman
1st November 2016, 06:12 AM
Ding!! Ding!!! Ding!!
Battle Royale!!@! Yes !
Watching these two go at it reminds me of this oldy moldy..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onR7PD3Grc0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onR7PD3Grc0
;D
7th trump
1st November 2016, 06:44 AM
YOUR fantasy. What is YOUR explanation?
Let me get this straight!
You say:
And how many prisons are funded on the SSNs of those incarcerated for drug related crimes?
I call your silly out because you are contradicting yourself from many many other threads on the subject matter of money. Which you reply saying its my fantasy of what you said and that I'm now to try and explain what you said?
Hmmmm.....you really a mentally fucked up piece of shit aren't you.
Heres an idea palani!
Try not believing in all these conspiracy theories. Take one at a time and try to find if it holds any water. This way you wont be confused by them all.
They really are like lies....you cant remember all of them. You get confused by them and you ramble them all together.
7th trump
1st November 2016, 06:46 AM
Ding!! Ding!!! Ding!!
Battle Royale!!@!
Glad you're getting a chuckle.
palani
1st November 2016, 07:00 AM
Let me get this straight!
Weren't you were going to get this straight?
Why do you insist upon getting it crooked?
cheka.
1st November 2016, 07:11 AM
prof needs his own pronoun....maybe gayssuck....or sjwslayer
singular_me
1st November 2016, 11:54 AM
all this because people are absolutely clueless that the left hemisphere of the brain is masculine, and the right one feminine... This is the immutable Law Of Gender....so all what the educational agenda has to do is to push the buttons, either right or left or both at once.
leave kids alone with minimal external influence about sexuality and they will find out by themselves
keehah
14th January 2021, 01:53 PM
...so all what the educational agenda has to do is to push the buttons...
This agenda be Democrat crazy making!
Charlotteobserver: No more ‘he’ or ‘she’. House approves gender-neutral terms in its official language (https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article248264460.html)
January 04, 2021
A code of conduct change in the U.S. House of Representatives swaps gendered language for gender-inclusive terms in its official language.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from California, and Rules Committee Chairman James McGovern, a Democrat from Massachusetts, outlined the proposal Friday. It’s included in a package of “sweeping” rule changes that, among other things, promote diversity and inclusion in the 117th Congress.
The House approved the package Monday in a 217-206 vote on party lines, The Hill reports.
The rule change does not ban the use of gendered language in the House. Instead, it renames specific, official language found in the House rules.
Here are the words found in various parts of the code will change:...
Breitbart: House Democrats Temporarily Changed Rules to Allow President to Be Called a Racist (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/01/13/house-democrats-temporarily-changed-rules-to-allow-president-to-be-called-a-racist/)
January 13, 2021
Democrats called President Donald Trump a racist several times during the House debate on impeachment Wednesday, taking advantage of a temporary rule change they passed earlier this week.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) also chimed in, calling Trump the “racist-in-chief.”
Normally, such language is prohibited by House rules. But House Democrats passed a temporary rule change on Tuesday that applies to debate on H. Res. 21 and H. Res. 24. The former urged Vice President Mike Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Trump (which he declined to do); the latter is the article of impeachment against President Trump.
The rule change “Provides that the prohibition against personality in debate with respect to references to the President shall not apply during consideration of H. Res. 21 or any special order of business providing for the consideration of H. Res. 24.”
The new rule passed the House Rules Committee along party lines.
NewsPunch: Pelosi Violated Her Own ‘Gender Language’ Rules During Impeachment Debate (https://newspunch.com/pelosi-violated-her-own-gender-language-rules-during-impeachment-debate/)
January 14, 2021
During the debate regarding the second impeachment of President Trump, Pelosi broke the rules on gendered language by referring to herself using words that she had banned
“I stand before you as a wife, a mother, a grandmother, a daughter, a daughter whose father proudly served in this Congress” Pelosi said….
But according to the congressional rules she should have said “I stand before you as a spouse, a parent, a grandparent, and a child.”
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.